OTHERS' VIEWS

OTHERS' VIEWS

 

In every democratic dispensation, power is held in trust by those elected or appointed, not possessed as a divine right. It is this sacred understanding of representative leadership that makes the idea of being “power drunk” so distasteful and dangerous. When one considers the trajectory of leadership in Nigeria, particularly in moments when power is temporarily transferred or delegated, the metaphor of intoxication becomes apt as those entrusted with temporary authority often lose grip of reality and begin to behave as though they are the anointed sovereigns. That is why the situation currently playing out in Rivers State, where the newly appointed Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.), who is temporarily acting on behalf of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, raises deep concerns.

This article is not intended to impugn the administrator’s actions and statements made in the last few days nor an attempt to undermine the leadership of Ibas, but rather, it is a cautionary commentary borne out of Nigeria’s political experience where those given the chance to “hold brief” for democratically elected political leaders often end up believing the briefcase belongs to them. It is a reminder that being an acting leader is not the same as being the elected one, and that wielding delegated power must be approached with humility, loyalty, and an unshakable understanding of its transient nature.

The phrase “power drunk” is not mere hyperbole. It is a vivid metaphor drawn from the human tendency to become intoxicated, literally or figuratively, when given more than they can handle. The word “drunk” has its roots in the Old English druncen, descending from Proto-Germanic drunkanaz, and signifying a state of losing control due to alcohol. When paired with “power,” it describes a mental and emotional derailment triggered not by substance but by a surge of influence and authority. It is this heady influence that leads temporary officeholders to act rashly, arrogantly, or autocratically, often forgetting the mandate, loyalty, and structure that brought them to power in the first place.

Unfortunately, Nigeria has seen this play out countless times, be it in caretaker governors, acting chairpersons, or interim ministers who mistake their temporary elevation for a coronation. Rivers State should not be another case study of this familiar Nigerian tragedy.

Let’s be clear: Fubara's Mandate Belongs to the People.  Siminalayi Fubara was elected by the people of Rivers State. The votes cast during the gubernatorial election were in his name, under his manifesto, and rooted in the people's belief in his leadership. If, for any reason, the machinery of governance demands that he steps aside temporarily or delegates’ responsibility, it does not confer full political authority to any acting figure. It only signals continuity, nothing more, nothing less.

Therefore, Ibas must not fall into the tempting trap of seeing himself as more than a steward of Fubara’s administration during his absence. His role is to uphold and implement the agenda already set by Fubara, not to begin rewriting the playbook or initiating actions that might imply a divergence from the elected vision.

We have seen how friction between governors and their deputies can destabilize the peace and development of a state. Even in recent history, many deputy governors have capitalized on moments of temporary leadership to pursue their own interests, align with political enemies of their principals, or openly challenge the authority of the governors they were elected to serve alongside. This isn’t just disloyal, it’s a betrayal of democratic ethics.

Rivers State, as strategic as it is in Nigeria’s political and economic space, has endured more than its fair share of political drama. From the days of Rotimi Amaechi to the thunderous tenure of Nyesom Wike, the state's political terrain has never been short of fireworks. It has now entered a more delicate phase under Fubara, who, despite resistance from political godfathers, is navigating the terrain with restraint and a sense of focus.

Injecting any more instability into the system, particularly through the actions or inactions of an overambitious acting deputy, would only inflame tensions. Rivers State doesn’t need a show of ego. It needs service, maturity, and alignment.

Being in charge temporarily is like standing in the spotlight on stage, it might feel warm, it might be bright, and it might draw attention. But it is not the sun. The spotlight can be turned off at any moment. And when it does, all that matters is how gracefully the actor played their part. Ibas should understand that her current status is a chapter, not the whole book. And when this chapter closes, she will be judged not by how loudly she roared, but how well she served the interests of the people and remained loyal to the governor.

The wise ones who have held power, even temporarily, often describe it as a burden rather than a trophy. They know it is not a license to lord over others but an obligation to serve. Power in its best form is silent, effective, and humble. The moment it becomes noisy, arrogant, and self-serving, it loses legitimacy, no matter how constitutionally backed it may seem.

We must not forget the political implosions that were caused by acting leaders who allowed temporary power to get to their heads. From the days of regional politics to the current Fourth Republic, many political careers were shortened or permanently stained because individuals failed to draw the line between opportunity and overreach.

The late Chief Obafemi Awolowo once noted, “The worst form of leadership is to lead people without their consent.” Acting leaders must remember this, because when the people did not vote for you, your role is service, not control.

At a time when citizens are increasingly distrustful of politicians and impatient with misgovernance, any sign of deviation from democratic order is not just frowned upon, it is resisted, both online and on the streets. Ibas must tread with caution. His every action, body language, and directive are under scrutiny. The people are watching. Civil society is watching. And history is watching.

Even a whiff of disloyalty to Governor Fubara will not only harm his political credibility but could open him to public criticism that may not be easily erased. Political ambition must never override public duty. And no temporary title is worth the reputation it could destroy.

To Ibas, this is your moment to prove that leadership can still be dignified. Show Nigerians, especially Rivers people, that not every acting leader loses the plot. Let humility guide you, let loyalty ground you, and let wisdom lead you.

Act with the awareness that you are standing in for a man with a democratic mandate, not replacing him. Understand that power is a loan, not a crown. And when the curtain falls, may you be remembered as a loyal steward, not a power-drunk usurper.

Without a doubt, the fear of seeing Ibas becoming power drunk might had inspired the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas to remind the Sole Administrator that by the provision of the 1999 Constitution (As amended), he must report to the National Assembly in running the affairs of the oil-rich state.

The Speaker gave the charge in Abuja on Tuesday, April 14, 2025, while inaugurating the House of Representatives Ad-Hoc Committee on Rivers State.

The time to act with maturity is now.

 

“Why has Nigeria, with all its natural wealth and human potential, continued to struggle while other equally endowed nations have advanced and prospered?”
 
The room was charged with curiosity, frustration, and disbelief. How could a nation so richly endowed with natural resources, blessed with a youthful and talented population, and strategically located on the global map, stagnate—or worse, regress—for over six decades since independence? How could a country with such immense promise and a diaspora of highly skilled professionals devolve into a nation crippled by poverty, injustice, corruption, insecurity, and chronic underdevelopment?
 
Following from the above experience at an international 'fora'. A compass guides and gives direction. Morality is how we differentiate good from evil (conscience). Doesn't seem like our beloved country, Nigeria, has a working moral compass anymore, or the current moral compass is extremely unstable and broken. Understandably, we all have consciences. It is a link directly from our spirit to God and the help he makes available to us all. Every time we feel and follow its promptings, we gain light in our minds and souls. Every time we ignore or reject the counsel from our conscience, it darkens our minds and souls. Hence, to have a strong moral compass or values means we think of our actions, consequences, and how they will affect others.
 
In the words of Dr Sam Amadi, a policy strategist, law and governance expert, "Nigeria’s leadership failures are glaring. What is not very evident is how to end the run of failure. How do we get a leadership that is fit for purpose? Every new administration is an opportunity to begin afresh the quest for good and effective leadership. But sadly, it is easily lost because the pressing urgency of politics as usual prevents the beginning of a different leadership journey."
 
As argued by Dr. Amadi, the government can play both good and bad. Nonetheless, our collective silence can embolden bad government. Generally speaking, functional governments survive and non-functional ones collapse. So the question of whether a government does more harm than good is meaningless, because some governments can be very effective, and others are complete failures. Sustainable governments tend to both survive and thrive.
 
Nigeria is a multi-ethnic and culturally diverse federation of 36 autonomous states and the Federal Capital Territory. Despite having the largest economy and population in Africa, Nigeria offers limited opportunities to most of its citizens. This is a result of a failure of leadership and poor management of resources. Sadly, the disillusionment is not just palpable—it is overwhelming. Nigerians were promised a break from the failures of the past, but what we are witnessing is a deepening of the very rot we hoped to escape.
 
Under Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s watch, inflation has skyrocketed, the naira has crumbled, and insecurity has become a terrifying norm. From the streets of Zamfara to the villages of Benue, Plateau, Bornu and Uromi blood flows unchecked while leadership remains disturbingly silent. 
 
The loud promises of change have turned into a deafening silence in the face of suffering. If this is the 'renewed hope' that was promised, then it has only renewed the pain and despair of the average Nigerian. Oh God, Nigeria and Nigerians are in your Unfailing, Ever-Faithful, and steady Hands. PLEASE HELP US
 
Statistically speaking, Nigeria has consistently ranked low in the World Governance Index in areas such as government effectiveness, political stability,, and the presence of violence and terrorism, rule of law, and control of corruption. Let me say categorically that the foundation of Nigeria’s problems is rooted in her flawed political and economic system. 
 
Sadly, NIGERIA is gasping for breath under the weight of corruption. In TI’s report on 2024, Nigeria was ranked the 36th most corrupt country in the corruption perceptions index. Nigeria scored 26 points, one point better than 2023, TI said. But this is no reason to celebrate. 26 points is a lamentable score and does not prove Nigeria is on the mend.
 
In conclusion, it is posited, that a moral renaissance will demand for a renewed focus on ethical behavior, accountability, and a commitment to social responsibility, aiming to foster a society grounded in values and principles.
 
Finally, we need to take action to remedy our society. We need a moral and social renaissance. In the intricate tapestry of human society, leadership is a cornerstone that shapes the trajectory of our shared journey.
 
Richard Odusanya
odusanyagold@gmail.com

Perhaps the most telling moment in the National Broadcasting Commission’s ban of rapper Eedris Abdulkareem’s track, “Tell Your Papa” is its acknowledgement that the song was already trending on social media. If they knew that many of us had already listened to the song, and we have almost endless means to access the track anytime we wanted, why did they impose a ban on it? Of what use is such a ban in a country where the reach of social media surpasses that of broadcast media houses? How many people get their news from the traditional media compared to those who rely on ubiquitous social media apps where materials like “Tell Your Papa” freely circulate?

As much as I agree with observers who have challenged NBC on free speech, there is also more than a violation of democratic rights at work here. The NBC’s banning of a protest song they consider “objectionable” (to whom, anyway?) is telling of the analogue intelligence that runs this country, a realisation as frightening as the loss of fundamental human rights. This lack of organisational reflexivity and stimulation towards continuous self-reinvention explains why our society always seems to be stuck in the same spot.

This is, of course, not to dismiss the aspect of fundamental rights. The ban is one of the countless instances of the assault on free speech under the present administration, a government ironically peopled by men who boast about their record of once “fighting for democracy”. Yet, nobody has done more to diminish democratic freedoms in Nigeria than these so-called activists. One of the instruments of their insidious warfare is, of course, the police. Currently, the police have made it their job to subvert free speech by elevating what should otherwise be inconsequential social exchanges to the level of “threat to public peace” and proceeding to act on it with unwarranted violence. This has become so recurrent that we are as good as inured to their excesses.

The other weapon through which free speech is being corrupted is the activities of public administrations like the NBC. Several times in this column, I have raised issues with the NBC and its obsequious tendency to court the favour of the government in power by punishing media houses that give a voice to a dissenting part of the populace. There was a time the NBC would release a bulletin listing the names of electronic broadcast stations that said one or two things they found “objectionable” and fine them heavily. Once, Bayo Onanuga cried wolf because a broadcast on one of the television stations had gotten his feelings hurt and the next thing the NBC did was slam a fine on the media house. They are that openly partisan. Even basing its objection to “Tell Your Papa” on its supposed objectionable contents would have been entirely hilarious if this were a satire. How is a song composed to protest an oppressive government expected to be inoffensive? Funny, but only in the way a tragedy makes you laugh to keep from crying.

 

What is really infuriating is that NBC is run by civil servants who probably have no serious idea what it takes to maintain a business in an economically hostile society like Nigeria. If they manage a backyard poultry, you can bet they will run it down. Those lacking an idea of what it takes to build an enterprise are more inclined to pursue aggressive tactics that threaten the survival of businesses. The NBC slams heavy fines on media houses that refuse to grovel before the powers that be, while conveniently forgetting that broadcast media are economic enterprises that must not only cater to an audience but must also make enough money to keep afloat. The civil servants in NBC have no such insights. Its job is to listen to the radio and television day and night, nitpick a few sentences they deem anti-government, and chase down the business with a fine. Thankfully, the court reined in its excesses by ruling on its fine as an administrative overstep. Now they are back in the public eye, seeking relevance by banning a song that gives voice to the many dissensions roiling contemporary Nigeria.

 

Yet, one cannot help but wonder what relevance organisations like the NBC have in the digital age. Why does it still exist? First, we live in a world where communication can be said to be out of control. Global media systems have empowered us to act outside the limits of the nation-state, and those of us in underdeveloped countries under repressive governments have been prime beneficiaries of this technological advancement. There are no borders on the internet, thankfully. The capitalist forces that control the algorithms (the technology that determines the range of what we see on our social media pages) have no use for our petty Nigerian issues; they will not shut down social media because a Tinubu does not like a song.

When I say the NBC ban on “Tell Your Papa” goes beyond the very vital matter of free speech, it is because I am sincerely perplexed by the failure of the NBC—and by extension, the Federal Government that funds it—to reinvent itself for a digital age. It is stubbornly stuck to the analogue means of managing the parameters of public discourse. While the world has changed significantly, it holds on to the illusions of a glorious past where it controlled the electronic media and, consequently, the range of public speech. NBC’s ineffective bans also reflect other larger systemic issues: the people running this country demonstrably lack the dynamism and flexibility to continuously reinvent and (re-) organise their administrative mandate to match social reality. This is a story of underdevelopment sponsored by the leaden-footedness of a leadership class that cannot cultivate its instincts to adjust to a world where the ground beneath its feet has long shifted.

This failure to reposition themselves to confront the dictates of the new world speaks to the broader issues of leadership and management, a crisis of imagination that haunts us at many levels. Its effects are reflected in the recrudescence of our national crises, to which we respond by marshalling the same old arguments as we did the last time. Hardly anything ever changes, and when all we do is relive the former moments, we appear to be stuck in history. Things have gotten so repetitive that you know the best even the Presidency will do to address the recurring spate of killing orgies under his watch is to “condemn” the violence and then deflect the responsibility just like he did the last time and as his predecessor also did. There are no solutions, not because our problems are irresolvable, but because our leaders are bored and can no longer stimulate themselves to fresh, vivacious thinking. When the leadership fails to reinvent itself and falls back on the same old methods that once worked, they also lose the opportunity to infuse vitality into the polity. Everything will appear to be dead still.

Finally, I do not know the extent to which Seyi Tinubu— the President’s son at whom the song was directed—influenced the media ban, but the NBC did him no favour. Even if the ogas at the top had pressured it to ban the song as a gesture of loyalty to Tinubu, there are more than enough contemporary experiences to which they could have referred to their paymasters to warn them that banning a song in the age of Twitter was a bad idea. What exactly did the song say that we do not say every day? Seyi, too, is not exactly a private citizen. He has been all over the place, ostentatiously lapping up the privileges that come with being the President’s son. So, why is someone like that beyond criticism? Does he have two heads, or why exactly does he deserve a pass? Even if this bad was a self-directed organisational decision by the NBC, the ban is still an imprudent one. Someone at NBC must really hate Seyi to have done this.

In the wake of the disappearance, on Monday, of Crypto Bridge Exchange Smart-Treasures, widely known as CBEX, a digital asset platform, grief and regret have enveloped the land and understandably so. In the coming days, some will commit suicide, having watched, in some cases, entire life savings, pensions and hope for a more secured financial future evaporate like morning dew.

This latest Ponzi scheme, experts say, may have cost the victims an estimated N1.4 trillion. Such colossal sum will, no doubt, have dire consequences, including the disappearance of the sanguinity of the unfortunate investors.

The CBEX swindle, now Nigeria’s biggest Ponzi scam, when added to an estimated N300 billion lost since 2016 gives an estimated N1.7 trillion lost by Nigerians in sundry Ponzi schemes in nine years.

 
 

Because CBEX, believed to be a Chinese-owned digital trading company, with no verifiable physical presence in Nigeria, lured its hapless clients with promise of high returns, some Nigerians have uncharitably labelled them greedy people, victims of their own gluttony. Though not pronounced loudly, it is hard to miss the “it serves them right” sneer in most of the ongoing conversations.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, said that much on Wednesday when its spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, claimed that the anti-graft agency has, for the umpteenth time, warned Nigerians against falling for Ponzi schemes.

Exonerating the EFCC from blame, Oyewale said: “In March 2024, the EFCC Chairman, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, directed us to publish a list of 58 Ponzi scheme operators to warn the public. That shows we’ve been proactive. We had already been monitoring CBEX, and we’ve continuously advised Nigerians to stay away from such deceptive platforms. We have empowered, enlightened and informed the public. Nigerians must take responsibility for safeguarding their investments by verifying compliance with relevant laws.”

Weighing in on the matter same day, The Guardian newspaper, in its lead story, “Desperate Nigerians lose over N1.7tr to Ponzi schemes in nine years,” listed five ways to spot such a scam, including high returns with no risk, pressure to reinvest and recruit new investors, guaranteed return on investment, unknown owners/corporate offices and unregistered and unregulated business.

While these tips may come in handy, they are not sufficient.

Why? Like most things here, there is neither a pattern in the country’s Ponzi madness. Financial institutions such as banks, insurance and stock market companies, duly registered and regulated are known to have disappeared with investors funds.

Truth be told, these scams have persisted not because the victims are greedy or not discerning enough but because nobody is held accountable for such frauds. There are no consequences for bad conduct in the financial sector despite the fact of regulatory agencies such as SEC.

I know this for a fact because I am a victim. And I am a victim not because I am greedy or not discerning enough to differentiate Ponzi schemes from genuine investment channels. No! I am a victim because the line that differentiates both is too tenuous, neither firmly established nor well-defined. I am an investment enthusiast because I believe that it is as important to an individual as it is to an organisation and a state. Investment is a powerful tool for wealth accumulation and financial security. Because it helps in generating passive income, it is the primary way people save for retirement. Simply put, people invest to meet obligations in the future. I also grew up believing that the more diversified the investment portfolio, the better, hence my foray into insurance, stocks and bonds.

Three years ago, I lamented my experience in the insurance world with an article, “Industrial and General Insurance Plc. as a Ponzi scheme.”

I wrote: “Is Nigeria’s insurance industry now a glorified Ponzi scheme? This is the question concentrating the minds of investors right now… The reason is simple. When an insurance company defaults in paying the claims of clients at the maturity of a policy, it is not better than a Ponzi scheme, an unconscionable pyramid investment that lures investors solely to defraud them. An insurance firm that conjures all manner of policies to entice clients without intention of meeting obligations is a pyramid investment. Simple!”

I got paid eventually though I was shortchanged, courtesy of this article. But till date, hundreds, if not thousands of IGI clients, are yet to be paid many years after the maturity of their policies.

Right now, I am a victim of another Ponzi scheme, this time by Cashcraft Asset Management Limited.

For those who may not know, the company, a dealing member of the Nigerian Stock Exchange, which registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, as a broker and fund manager, was incorporated in 1991 with an authorised capital of N3 billion, and shareholders’ funds of over N1.5 billion. As at the time I invested, it had physical offices all over the country, with a proclamation that: “Cashcraft is one of the leading Asset Management firms in Nigeria and is positioned to build enduring wealth for you.”

One of their products was the Personal Earning Annuity Scheme, P.E.A.S, which was designed, according to them and with the permission of SEC, to meet the long term investment needs of self-employed people, business owners and individuals both in public and private sectors.

“The scheme is a disciplined and consistent investment plan which could be used to store and create wealth for the future which makes the retirement period a season of relaxation and happy memories, and not of financial worries,” the company boasted.

The scheme, they insisted, was managed in such a way that it guaranteed gradual increase in capital and adequate securities for a client’s future needs after active working life, in addition to affording a unique opportunity to take care of dependants in the event of premature death.

“Take your destiny into your hands, subscribe to P.E.A.S plan now!! And take care of your retirement period!” they ululated.

I believed them. In September 2006, I took a 15-year PEAS Investment Plan worth N500,000. On maturity in September 2021, I was supposed to be paid N6,289,988. In December 2016, I invested another N3 million under the PEAS Education Plan for my children, with a maturity date of December 10, 2026.

When the N500,000 investment matured, Cashcraft, like IGI Insurance, refused to pay. Alarmed, I complained to the SEC management in a meeting in Lagos. They literally threw their hands in the air. I then got my lawyers to write the company not only to demand payment for the investment that has already matured but a termination of my childrens’ education policy and refund of my capital.

As I write, Cashcraft Asset Management Limited, just like CBEX, has vanished, literally, into thin air.

In September 2024, some Nigerians, fellow victims of the Cashcraft Ponzi scheme, petitioned the House of Representatives over their failed investments totaling more than N8 billion. The group, in the petition sponsored by a member representing Awka North/South Federal Constituency of Anambra State,  Professor Obiageli Lilian Orogbu, demanded the intervention of NASS to help it recover the trapped funds.

Unfortunately, almost eight months thence, that has not happened. The 9,326 hapless Nigerians, including my humble self, scammed by this soulless company of their hard-earn money are yet to get justice even as the promoters of the Ponzi scheme live large with their stolen wealth.

As Orogbu told her colleagues last year, Cashcraft Asset Management Limited is duly licensed by the Nigerian Stock Exchange, NSE. So, Nigerians who invested with them are not financial illiterates. It is not their fault that the company went rogue. They are also entitled to protection as citizens. It, therefore, behoves the Nigerian state to ensure that Cashcraft fulfills its obligations to them.

On the face value, the amended Investment and Securities Act, ISA, 2025, which was signed into law in March by President Bola Tinubu is a step in the right direction because it is not only a sweeping reform aimed at strengthening investor protection and tightening oversight of Nigeria’s capital market, it explicitly criminalises the operation and promotion of Ponzi schemes, empowering the SEC to prosecute offenders with penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

But while the amended Act is a significant step forward, legislation alone is not enough to stem the wave of financial scams. Enforcement is the elephant in the room. It is good that the EFCC has assured CBEX investors of getting back their funds even when CBEX is a foreign company that operated online without legal status in Nigeria. The anti-graft agency should also make the same commitment to victims of Cashcraft Asset Management Limited because both companies are two of a kind, agents of financial darkness in the Ponzi netherworld.

The pain from the death of my friend lingers. It weighs me down. I hardly sleep through the night with a headache.

I am thinking of the meaninglessness of life, of human mortality, and the inevitability of death that ‘will come, when it will come’.

I wake early. My heart is pounding with grief. I head to the airport for my early morning flight to Abuja.

What happens next is fortuitous, a divine script. At the airport, I am allocated seat number 1C. We soon start to board. I take my front row seat. Others follow.

Then he embarks. His small retinue of aides indicate his status. He is wearing a simple traditional Igbo attire - a red cap on a red Isiagu and white trousers. This is not a small man. I recognize him immediately.

His seat is 1A, right next to mine.

I salute him. The broad smile on his face is no more than his usual dispensation of courtesies to everyone around him. He is a very friendly political leader. He takes the seat next to me.

I don’t waste any time at all.

‘Accept my sincere condolences, Your Excellency’.

He looks at me with some measure of surprise. Obviously, he does not know what I am talking about. It also confirms he does not recognize me.

‘The passage of Christian Chukwu’, I guide him. ‘I am Segun Odegbami’.

It adds up quickly in his head.

‘Ah, the Mathematical’. Recognition comes and lights up his face.

‘Thank you very much’, he says. ‘What a sad situation to lose one of the greatest heroes of this country, a legendary football player’.

He talks more about Christian Chukwu glowingly. He promises to support a befitting burial by the country for the born-leader and illustrious patriot. He recalls that Chairman Chukwu led a great generation of players in Rangers FC, IICC, Bendel Insurance and others, teams that played a big role in uniting the country in the years following the Civil War.

I tell him about Chukwu’s role, through his exemplary leadership of both Rangers International and the Green Eagles, of helping to heal the wounds inflicted on the psyche of Nigerians by the Nigerian Civil War.

Then he surprises me. He goes back in time to rekindle the magic of radio commentating: ‘Mathematical. He dribbles one, he dribbles two, he sprints down the touch line, he passes to Chukwu, he moves, oh, oh , oh……’.

He is actually running a commentary of an imaginary football match. Some of the passengers by our seats enjoy his sonorous rumbling voice, mimicking late Ernest Okonkwo.

He is obviously very happy to meet me. He says more than once as we settle down to a conversation that covers several subjects. It is as if we are long-separated friends running out on time to catch up.

We race through different subject matters until the plane taxis and lifts off into the darkening and pregnant clouds of Lagos at this time of the year.

Our conversation is like between two friends that have not seen each other for a long time, racing to catch up on things.

We talk about Christian Chukwu’s sad passage; his invitation to ex-Rangers players to the State House in Awka after he became governor; his support for the welfare of the Rangers players, a monthly stipend contributed by some of the South-East zone Governors. He desires that the stipend in increased. He tells me about his relationship with football. It is the only addiction he has.

He tells me he once cancelled an international trip whilst in transit in order to watch the Spanish El Classico on television between Real Madrid FC and FC Barca. Like me, he is a supporter of FC Barcelona. Up Barca!!

In his youth, he played football against his father’s wish, an old scar on his cheek-bone evidence of his defiance to play football on street pebbles.

He talks a little about his foray into politics, about Onitsha market and its poor reputation, plus the re-modeling of the city. There are steps to be taken to repair the image of the biggest public market in the whole of West Africa.

I ask him how he is able to run the State without borrowing a Kobo. That’s easy. He has prioritized his assignment to essential projects and has cut down on all waste.

He answers all my questions.

I am in his lecture-space.

He radiates confidence and happiness. His records of performance in almost 4 years will speak for him at the polls in his re-election bid.

The sound of the engines takes over. We go silent. By the time the plane gets to maximum height and starts to cruise comfortably, we are both taking a nap.

Abuja.

We resume our conversation as our plane lands in Abuja. Christian Chukwu is on our mind again. He led the Eagles at a glorious era in Nigeria, the 1970s and parts of the 1980s. He sees those years as half-filled, rather half-empty of opportunities to make Nigeria the greatest Black Nation on earth.

There is work to be done. Our responsibility is not to change the world but to play our parts in making a difference.

The only question he asks me is:’what do you do now?’.

I tell him - a little bit of this, a little bit of that.

I tell him about my only official portfolio is as Head of the Sports and Diplomacy Unit of the Nigeria Institute of International Affairs. I tell him about the ‘Wall of Fame’ and Allen Onyema’s role in that endeavour that makes me an Air Peace Ambassador.

We both wonder why we have never met before when we have several mutual friends.

We exchange numbers.

We take a picture as the plane stops finally.

We walk together from the plane to the arrival hall of the Airport where we part ways and promise to keep in touch.

Through all of this time he is greeting everyone around, sharing a few words here and there with even total strangers, a smile on his face always. He is a great man.

It is a great personal privilege and invaluable experience to have shared an entire 60 minutes, or so, with the former Governor of the Central Bank, and current Governor of Anambra State, PROFESSOR Chukwuma Soludo.

As I drive into Abuja, I am thinking.

3 members of the 1980 team have died in the past 3 months - Moses Effiong, Charles Bassey and ‘Chairman’ Christian Chukwu!

May they find absolutely peace with the Creator of the Universe! Amen.

Dr. Olusegun Odegbami, MON, OLY, AFNIIA, FNIS

 

One Nigerian businessman whose life exemplifies hard work, enthusiasm and resilience, is Mr. Tony Onyemaechi Elumelu CFR, fondly called TOE by friends and colleagues. Chairman of UBA Plc and Heirs Holdings, Elumelu sits on boards of several other conglomerates too numerous to mention.

Born on March 22, 1963, to parents from Onicha Ukwu in Aniocha North Local Government Area of Delta State, young Tony Onyemaechi had a modest upbringing but never looked back once he came of age.  At 62 he is not just a celebration of age but a celebration of purpose, persistence, and Pan-African impact.

Elumelu has proven that to build Africa’s future, we don’t need to look west—we need to look within. His journey is not just one of financial success, but of purposeful impact—a legacy that transcends numbers and speaks to the heart of a continent striving to overcome decades of stagnation and poverty.

As he marks another year, we look beyond his fortune to the deeper imprint he continues to leave: a legacy that breathes hope. At 62, Elumelu could have retired to enjoy the blessings that Almighty God has endowed him with but his passion and compassion for the African youth have been the adrenaline driving him.

He had earned the accolades: Forbes lists, global awards, honorary doctorates. But for him, legacy isn’t something you write in a will. It’s something you leave in people.

Tony Elumelu’s tenure as Group Managing Director of United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc, from 2005 to 2010, marked a transformational period that redefined the bank’s identity and elevated it to a Pan-African powerhouse.

Following the strategic merger between Standard Trust Bank (where Elumelu had served as CEO), and UBA in 2005, he led the combined entity with a bold vision: to build a world-class financial institution that would serve not just Nigeria, but the entire African continent and beyond.

Under his leadership UBA expanded from a single-country operation to a pan-African bank, establishing subsidiaries in over 20 African countries, as well as operations in New York, London, and Paris. The bank also introduced innovative digital banking platforms, improved customer experience, and modernized operations, setting new industry standards. UBA’s balance sheet and profitability saw consistent growth, and it became one of the largest and most respected banks in Africa.

This feat led to his recognition in 2008, as African Banker of the Year by the African Banker Awards. This award honored his transformational leadership at UBA, his role in championing cross-border banking in Africa, and his contributions to building a truly pan-African financial institution.

His win highlighted UBA’s growth under his stewardship and solidified his status as one of the most influential banking executives on the continent. Elumelu also championed strong corporate governance and transparency, which significantly boosted investor and public confidence.

He positioned UBA as a partner for development, aligning financial services with broader economic and social transformation across Africa. By the time he stepped down as GMD/CEO in 2010 due to the Central Bank of Nigeria's new policy,  Tony Elumelu had not only transformed UBA into a truly global bank, but had also laid a foundation of innovation, sustainability, and inclusive growth that continues to shape its legacy today.

His guiding philosophy—Africapitalism—defines this vision. Coined and championed by him, Africapitalism is the belief that the private sector, especially entrepreneurs, must play a central role in the development of the African continent. It argues that long-term investments in strategic sectors will not only yield profits but also create jobs, foster stability, and build inclusive prosperity.

At 62, Elumelu stands as a towering figure in the landscape of African entrepreneurship, finance, and philanthropy. A name that resonates across boardrooms, government halls, and startup hubs from Lagos to Accra, to Nairobi to Johannesburg,  Elumelu has become more than just a successful businessman—he is a symbol of what is possible on the continent.

His life’s work is a masterclass in purpose-driven leadership, and his mission is clear: to catalyze Africa’s economic transformation by empowering its entrepreneurs.

For Elumelu, success is not merely a personal triumph but a foreshadowing of a deeper vision. It isn’t just about profit. It is about people. It is about potential.

Perhaps the most transformative expression of Elumelu’s commitment to Africa is the Tony Elumelu Foundation (TEF). Launched in 2010, TEF has committed over $100 million to empower 10,000 African entrepreneurs over 10 years. As of 2025, it has already impacted thousands across 54 African countries, offering funding, training, and mentorship that many describe as life-changing.

These entrepreneurs are not just statistics; they are stories of transformation. Farmers in Malawi leveraging agri-tech; female founders in Ghana breaking into fintech; healthcare startups in Rwanda improving lives through innovation. Each story is a testament to Elumelu’s belief that Africa’s future lies in the hands of its people—not foreign aid, but local ideas and bold execution.

Entrepreneurs supported by the Tony Elumelu Foundation have generated over $4.2 billion in revenue across Africa and created more than 1.5 million jobs since the Foundation launched its flagship entrepreneurship programme in 2015.The impact of this initiative has extended to lifting over two million Africans out of poverty, making it one of the continent’s most significant privately-led economic empowerment programmes.

At 62, Tony Elumelu’s wealth and influence are undeniable. But what makes his legacy profound is not the size of his empire, but the scale of his impact. His life is a message that Africans can lead, build, and transform—on their own terms.

He has shown that philanthropy and capitalism are not mutually exclusive, and that profits and purpose can coexist. He has redefined success—not as personal gain, but as collective progress. As Tony Elumelu enters his 63rd year, the continent stands at a pivotal moment. With the largest youth population in the world, Africa holds immense untapped potential. But it also faces serious challenges—unemployment, inequality, and infrastructure gaps.

Elumelu’s work reminds us that the solutions are already here—in Africa’s young minds, waiting to be activated. If one man’s vision can ignite thousands of businesses, imagine what a continent of empowered, well-supported entrepreneurs could do. Elemelu is a firm believer that in the 21st century, what Africa needs is not aid but investment in infrastructure and investment in in the youths.  He was once quoted to have said: “supporting entrepreneurship is born out of a deep realisation that inaction could jeopardise the future of the continent, including that of those already considered successful”.

At 62, Tony O. Elumelu is more than a billionaire businessman—he is a movement. His name has become synonymous with transformational leadership, youth empowerment, and the bold reimagining of Africa’s economic narrative. While his wealth is substantial, it is his legacy beyond wealth that truly defines him.

In a world often obsessed with financial figures, Elumelu has redefined what it means to be successful. For him, it’s not about how much you have in your bank account—but how many lives you’ve touched, how many futures you’ve shaped, and how deeply you’ve inspired a continent to believe in itself. But what truly sets Elumelu apart is his commitment to using his influence to shift mindsets. He has made it fashionable to care, to give and to build.

Unlike many of his peers on the global billionaire stage, Elumelu’s wealth has always been tethered to purpose. He has consistently emphasized that profit without impact is hollow. Whether sitting on panels with world leaders or walking through rural communities, his message remains the same: Africa’s future is in the hands of its people, not in aids. As he celebrates another birthday, Elumelu’s legacy can be measured not just in years or dollar signs, but in hope restored, in jobs created and in ideas funded.

Among young Africans are those who now believe that they don’t have to leave the continent to live out their dreams. He represents the rare kind of leader who doesn’t just build companies—he builds people.

Tony Elumelu’s journey is far from over. As Africa navigates the complexities of a global economy, rising youth populations, and evolving digital landscapes, his voice and vision are needed more than ever. And if his past is any indication, the years ahead won’t just be about expanding empires—they’ll be about deepening impact.

Tony Elumelu is not defined by his fortune—but by the future he is helping shape. His wealth may open doors, but it is his wisdom, his will, and his unwavering belief in Africa that make him truly wealthy. His is a legacy not just of success—but of significance.

Kalu Okoronkwo, a former staff of UBA plc writes from Lagos Nigeria and can be reached via kalu.okoronkwo@gmail.com

Last modified on Wednesday, 16 April 2025 15:13

The Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, has seen the light, seemingly. He has been speaking about the readiness of the Nigerian government to transform the nation’s legacy broadcast outfits, NTA and Voice of Nigeria, into modern broadcast operations that will be reflective of the expectations of the people, especially government, and broadcast aficionados.

Idris spoke at the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, where he saw the real broadcast world that obviously sent him into delirium about what Nigeria can also do to fall in line with modern broadcasting. NAB combines state-of-the-art broadcast equipment exhibition with high-end conference and seminar presentations.

Last year on this column, we wrote: “If you are a regulator, like the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), which superintends the nation’s broadcast industry, Vegas is the place to be this April (2024) because at the NAB Show, there is so much knowledge available, so much expert information and master classes from the industry – manufacturers, vendors, software developers, programmers and even entertainers, that the regulator must soak itself in the midst without giving only the operators the opportunity for such knowledge. The regulator must be steps ahead if it is to provide proper regulatory direction and leadership for the industry.”

But knowing that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had placed a moratorium on official international travels at the time because of abuse in some quarters and the need to preserve much needed funds, we had argued: “But life doesn’t have to stop because of the stupidity and failing of others. This is why I want to make a case this morning. The broadcast regulator should be allowed to be in Vegas this April for the good of industry and country. A year out of Vegas by the regulator is like a year out of the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). It may take several decades to catch up, and the world and its inventions do not wait for the sluggardly.”

 

I am not sure Nigeria was officially represented at NAB last year. Such information was very painful to bear because such absence drains the industry of requisite knowledge.

This year the story is different as the Minister led a team to NAB, which includes: Charles Ebuebu, Director-General, National Broadcasting Commission (NBC); Salihu Dembos, Director-General, Nigerian Television Authority (NTA); Ali Muhammad Ali, Managing Director, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN); Lekan Fadolapo, Director-General, Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON); Jibril Ndace, Director-General, Voice of Nigeria (VON), among others.

Without doubt, the Minister was in good company as he took with him top officials of relevant government agencies who may be the ones to execute any plan put in place to revamp the industry. “Strategic communication is essential to ensuring that the policies of the Renewed Hope Agenda reach the Nigerian people effectively,” he said.

 

Idris, according to reports, had the listening ears of Thomas King, Chairman, KINTRONIC Laboratories; Khiran Keerodhur, Chief Operating Officer, Thompson Broadcast; and Gianluca Baccalini, Chief Operating Officer, Systems Engineering, and some others.

This year’s theme, The Tech, The Trend, The Future, captures every nuanced  reasoning and approximation of all-round development and growth of the broadcast  industry. The theme curates today’s industry happenings and contemplates a tomorrow that accommodates emerging broadcast trends and technologies no matter how expansive. It is hoped that the Minister can move beyond words to rescue the government stations from their antiquated state of being where they hibernate as industry dodos and dinosaurs, far beneath the private stations which have set the pace since broadcast deregulation in 1992.

Also last week, there was another significant development. The NBC placed broadcast restrictions on “Tell Your Papa” by Rap musician, Eedris Abdulkareem, as content was “deemed inappropriate for broadcast due to its objectionable nature. It is therefore classified as Not To Be Broadcast (NTBB), as it violates Section 3.1.8 of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code.”

The copy of the Code I have states in Section 3.8.1a as follows: “The Broadcaster shall ensure that obscene, indecent, vulgar language, lewd and profane expression, presentation or representation are not allowed in a programme.”

 

There is almost a seismic outrage. Since the song has not been banned in our private devices or homes or even in the social media, a majority of the people who have listened to it can’t really see anything mendacious in Eedris message to the Nigerian President through his son, Seyi, who, himself has roiled public sensibilities with outlandish claims about his father’s performance in office.

Eedris has his commanding view of reality which is expressed in the lyrics of Tell  Your Papa, part of which is stated here. “Seyi, tell your papa country hard. Tell your papa people dey die. Tell your papa this one don pass jagajaga,” he said.

Can reality or the truth be outlawed from our public spaces? No one can stop the creative artist from enjoying  his creative juice even if that may be bitter to some people, which is unfortunate and patently insincere. Are there no killings around the country? What is happening on the Plateau currently? Can it be lobotomised out of reality?

Global literary icon and foremost Nobel Laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka, has ventilated his mind on the Eedris ban. In a statement he said: “Courtesy of an artist operating in a different genre – the cartoon – who sent me his recent graphic comment on the event, I learnt recently of a return to the culture of censorship with the banning of the product of a music artist, Eedris Abdulkareem…..

 

“We have been through this before, over and over again, ad nauseum. We know where it all ends. It is boring, time-wasting, diversionary but most essential of all, subversive of all seizures of the fundamental right of free expression,” he observed.

Prof Soyinka couldn’t miss the dose of irony as he pointed out that, “The ban is a boost to the artist’s nest egg. Mr Abdulkareem must be currently warbling his merry way all the way to the bank. I envy him.”

 

The Nobel Laureate understands what it is for the artist to be repressed by the state. His experiences during the Nigerian Civil War may be too remote for our social media generation who attack his pronouncements, although they hardly understand the language he speaks. Eedris, although much junior to Soyinka in every scale of societal ranking, encapsulates every aspect of the statement.

He had been there before. Protest music seems to be his forte. In the book, The Handkerchief – The Story of High Chief Raymond Anthony Aleogho Dokpesi, Eedris shared his experience under President Obasanjo. “Everybody knows that identity. The identity will give you who  I am and what I stand  for. In 2004, I dropped the song, Nigeria Jagajaga and President Obasanjo came to the national TV and said, “That boy wey sing Nigeria Jagajaga, na your papa and your mama Jagajaga. It was the best thing that ever happened to me. From a nobody, the President made me somebody,” Eedris recalled with some pride.

 

When President Obasanjo responded to Eedris in his characteristic acerbic humour, the matter was literally over. But times have changed, and the reading of signs and reality have been tainted by prejudiced views of patriotism and warped interpretation of official responsibilities.

By placing NTBB on Tell Your Papa, NBC has only achieved the opposite effect – drawing attention to a song people hardly knew was in existence. It is even worse now because Nigerians are angrier that the broadcast regulator is denying them necessary channels/opportunities of reaching the President with pressing legitimate complaints that may spur him into doing something about their desperate concerns and receding expectations. It was a wrong move by NBC from every interpretation; a ricochet of sorts.

Indeed, Falola’s towering global stature as a leading global scholar has been well documented. But not much is said about the life-touching things he does in the quiet, intimate corners of humanity.

There is no gainsaying that Professor Toyin Falola is Africa’s gift to the world of ideas, intellectualism, and advancement of the human civilisation. From Ibadan he stormed the World, leaving global footprints as a leading architect of the African intellectual renaissance. In many respects, he blazes the trail as a thought leader whose journey and impact cuts across continents, races, and generations.

As a child, I grew up in a premise made up of dual bungalows. A cemented play area separated the main bungalow from a smaller bungalow that had six rooms in what used to be referred to as a face-me-I-face-you dwelling, wherein my parents rented a room.

Many an evening, before bedtime, when it was not raining, all the children from their respective rooms in the compound came with their ‘apotis’ (stools) and a few mats and gathered in the cemented common area between the two bungalows. The gathering was to listen to fascinating stories from elderly residents, whether parents or relations of parents, who were in Ijebu-Ode from varying adjoining villages, as apprentices learning one trade or the other.

The stories provided great philosophical underpinnings of values of public-spiritedness, hard work, contentment, avoidance of avarice, etc. A lot of creativity was involved. The stories were often laced with insights from the Yoruba cosmology that included exposure to the world of spirits of all sorts that one finds in the first African novel published in English or Pidgin English outside of Africa, in 1952 in the UK and in 1953 in the US, Amos Tutuola’s The Palm-Wine Drinkard. Before Tutuola, though, DO Fagunwa had, in Yoruba, pioneered the creativity of taking people into the realms of spirits, demons, and the dead.

At an early age, children were socialised into many different worlds. These tales were by the moonlight or in almost total darkness, as there was no electricity but a flicker of light provided by kerosene lamps of all sorts. The lantern was popular in this regard. These formed my first conjectures about “iwin”,”ẹbọra”, àjẹ́, and even Fela Anikulapo Kuti’s adoption of “abamì èdá,” following being initially known as Omo ìyá àje. These older story-tellers never clarified how “iwin”, differed from “ẹbọra”. But we knew that àjẹ́ referred to an initiated human female, with supernatural powers, including powers to take life. But in these unisex days, I guess a human male can also be an ajẹ́.

Both “iwin” and “ẹbọra” as supernatural elements, we were told, were ghosts or ghost-like. They could be encountered in the deep forests or like the dead, only in dreams. We knew of older women suspected to be àjẹ́, but as kids, we could only imagine “iwin” and “ẹbọra”. After all, they were not of our world. But that was not until Chief Olusegun Obasanjo accepted being dubbed as “ẹbọra” Owu. Spirits can be malevolent or benevolent, depending on the circumstances and one’s beliefs.

Since Baba Obasanjo is a known “ẹbọra”, then it is possible for living beings to have supernatural capacities that earn them the appellations of “iwin” and “ẹbọra”. Or a unique superhuman persona like Fela could result in the acceptance that such a being is an “abami eda”. Of late, I have been wondering about which would be the correct appellation for Toyin Falola. For all he has achieved and continues to achieve, I asked him which would be the correct description for him from all or none of the above. Toyin Falola responded with a question: what of all the above?

There is no gainsaying that Professor Toyin Falola is Africa’s gift to the world of ideas, intellectualism, and advancement of the human civilisation. From Ibadan he stormed the World, leaving global footprints as a leading architect of the African intellectual renaissance. In many respects, he blazes the trail as a thought leader whose journey and impact cuts across continents, races, and generations.

A total of nine Festschrifts have been produced in his honour. Beyond the written word, Falola has been a formidable voice in shaping African studies, delivering keynote lectures across the globe, serving as president of the African Studies Association, and leading landmark academic and policy discussions on Africa’s place in the world. Mr Toyin Falola has granted so many interviews to many media platforms, not only on the state of African studies and scholarship, but also on critical issues to the society, economy, and politics of Africa and the world at large.

A recipient of numerous prestigious honours that affirm his unparalleled all-encompassing contributions to academia. Herein lies the most interesting part of Toyin Falola’s legacies. His fine capacity to achieve such an uncommon feat in academics, yet capable enough to attend to so many other areas of interest at the same period, over about seven decades of life. This is something many academics continue to find extremely difficult, if not nearly impossible. He has brought very significant contributions to the study of the Humanities, Social Sciences, Literature, and Jurisprudence.

His various efforts over the past decades have reputedly resulted in the authorship, co-authorship, and editing of over 200 books, journals, and academic works on African History, Pan-Africanism, Anglo-African cultures, Latin America and Africa’s interaction with the outside world, to mention just a few. His seminal works, such as Key Events in African History: A Reference Guide, Nationalism and African Intellectuals, as well as Tradition and Change in Africa, have become indispensable in the study of African history and politics. Through many innovative platforms, such as the Toyin Falola Network, Falola Interviews, and Falola Media, he has continued to engage consistently, sharing his ideas, depths, and experiences.

A total of nine Festschrifts have been produced in his honour. Beyond the written word, Falola has been a formidable voice in shaping African studies, delivering keynote lectures across the globe, serving as president of the African Studies Association, and leading landmark academic and policy discussions on Africa’s place in the world. Mr Toyin Falola has granted so many interviews to many media platforms, not only on the state of African studies and scholarship, but also on critical issues to the society, economy, and politics of Africa and the world at large.

Indeed, Falola’s towering global stature as a leading global scholar has been well documented. But not much is said about the life-touching things he does in the quiet, intimate corners of humanity. Beyond academics, his compassion has often revealed itself in deeply personal and localised ways. On such occasions, he extends not only his voice but his hands and heart to friends in trouble.

Falola’s approach has often been to reach out, mobilise support, and restore hope and happiness. He does these by sometimes driving heartfelt fundraising campaigns to help colleagues in distress, to pushing for support for ailing and needy colleagues and friends. One such moment was his response to the tragic ordeal of Professor Adigun Agbaje, when the institution he worked for, while on leave of absence from the University of Ibadan, abandoned him in the hands of kidnappers, even though he was on an official assignment when he was abducted. Falola stood firm in amplifying voices, drawing attention, and catalysing moral and financial solidarity with Agbaje’s family and friends.

Similarly, when Professor Ayo Olukotun took ill and later passed on, Falola did not fold his arms. Twice, he used the trust of friends to raise funds for the period of sickness and subsequent burial, since the institution he also worked for would not do much. He went a step further in championing a foundation in Olukotun’s memory, as a tribute and a living commitment to their shared ideals: justice, knowledge, and a better Nigeria.

It is this same usual character that Falola came through, adorned in his surprising customised adirẹ fabric, as gifts shared at my 70th birthday celebration, with his rich, insightful lecture in my honour in March. That lecture titled, “Power, Privilege and Philosophy,” was delivered with an alluring charm and depth that left the audience at once chuckling and thinking. Anyone who has listened to Falola from the rostrum knows that he has a unique way of delivery, aesthetically wrapping sharp critiques in wit, using humour as both a shield and sword in the quest for truth. Toyin Falola is a master in the twin approaches of story-telling and real deep academic talk in his delivery of lectures and speeches.

His seven-decade life is filled with numerous awards, and various honorary Doctorates worldwide, the latest, being an honorary Doctor of Law from the University of the Free State in South Africa. In addition, he had been bestowed with several African titles and global acclaim. However, it is Falola’s localised empathy, large-heartedness and intellectual generosity that remains one of his most profound and enduring legacies. Toyin Falola is a towering figure with a tender spirit, full of grace and humility.

In an assessment of the Toyin Falola superhuman with a large heart, Professor Serges Kamga said: “…it should be stated clearly that this enigma of a human has given selfless service to humanity. He epitomises humaneness. Throughout the stages of his academic history and career progress, he has continuously advanced the courses of people through his philanthropic disposition to people with whom he has no genetic or communal ties. Falola believes tenaciously that the growth of another individual has never been an impediment to others, and for that reason, he is a committed investor in the progress of others in ways that cannot be overemphasised…”

His seven-decade life is filled with numerous awards, and various honorary Doctorates worldwide, the latest, being an honorary Doctor of Law from the University of the Free State in South Africa. In addition, he had been bestowed with several African titles and global acclaim. However, it is Falola’s localised empathy, large-heartedness and intellectual generosity that remains one of his most profound and enduring legacies. Toyin Falola is a towering figure with a tender spirit, full of grace and humility. He writes extolling and appreciating the efforts, progress, and achievements of others.

Falola’s firm grip on the ways of culture and religion of the African peoples may have been influenced by his background, growing up in a sprawling, polygamous household that practised Islam, Christianity, and ancient Yoruba spirituality. Falola can connect scriptures in the Bible with tenets from the Quran and yet relate with some deep spiritual chants of the Yoruba Ifa. This interesting mix of different worldviews and religions easily reflects in his thinking and the depth of the stories in his rich academic outputs in various areas of the human and social sciences.

During his address to the graduating students at the University of the Free State in South Africa, Falola, in quick succession, rendered three African folk tales to drive home the import of the rule of law in the organised non-anarchical society. He would have made the chief storyteller of my first decade in life – Buroda Bode – then a mechanic in training grin with envy.

Another round of lectures ended in South Africa and I realised that I should have directed my question on who is Toyin Falola to Dr Bisi Falola – his wife of about four-and-a-half decades. So, Doc, is Toyin an “iwin”,”ẹbọra”, “àjẹ́”, or “abàmì edà” or none or all of the above? To be married to an academic is a major challenge. To be side-by-side with an itinerant scholar always on the move and who reputedly can also remain indoors writing non-stop for five to seven days requires a hugely understanding superhuman of sort.

I salute Mrs Bisi Falola for being a supportively humble and tolerant superb human in her own right. She is ever ready to welcome Toyin’s many friends to sumptuous meals, and even offer professional advice on health, as I was once a beneficiary from her merely listening to my voice over the phone. She got it right that I was sick and needed medical attention. A few days later, she initiated the call to check if I sought medical attention and was improving.

 

Babafemi A. Badejo, author of a best-seller on politics in Kenya, was a former Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Somalia, and is currently a legal practitioner and consultant at Yintab Strategy Consults, as well as the African Annual Conference at the University of Texas at Austin’s 2025 Nelson Mandela Distinguished Africanist Awardee.

 

Rita, Bob Nesta Marley’s widow, says who feels it knows it but in Nigeria, the reverse is the case! Here, who feels it does not know it and who does not feel it knows it! The lyrics of “Who feels it (Knows it)”, recorded in 1980 but released in 1981 goes thus: “Every man thinks his burden is the heaviest/But, ooh, yea, come on, they know because they feel”. She adds: “I feel it and I know it/If you feel it, you will know it”

That being the case, we expect Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, governor of Borno state, to know the security situation of his state more than a Minister or presidential aide in far-away Abuja. Apart from the fact that Zulum is the man on ground, he is also, according to the Constitution, the chief security officer of his state. For him to come out to raise the alarm that Boko Haram terrorists were gaining ground in his state means he must have got it up to his throat.

The BBC reported Zulum’s security alert thus: “The governor of Nigeria’s Borno state has warned that jihadist group Boko Haram is making a comeback after its fighters staged a series of attacks and seized control of some parts of the northeastern state. Babagana Zulum called for more military assistance for soldiers fighting the insurgency.
The Nigerian government has down played the governor’s fears, saying security in the country has improved in the last 18 months. Borno state has been at the centre of a 15-year insurgency by Boko Haram, which has forced more than two million people to flee their homes and (has) killed more than 40,000 (people)”

Reuters reported the same story thus: “Nigeria’s Islamist group Boko Haram has renewed attacks and kidnappings in northeastern Borno state with little push-back from security forces, suggesting that authorities in the region were losing ground to insurgents, the state’s governor has said. Militants from Boko Haram and its offshoot Islamic State West Africa Province have mainly operated in the northeast region of NIgeria, attacking security forces and civilians and displacing tens of thousands of people. In the last few years, Nigeria’s military had managed to push back against Boko Haram while internal fights with ISWAP further weakened the group.

“Borno State governor Babagana Zulum said Boko Haram had recently upped attacks, dislodging some military formations in several districts and killing civilians and security forces. It is a setback in the fragile state of Borno and the northeast region, Zulum said during a meeting with security forces in Borno state capital, Maiduguri… Zulum added that the ‘renewed Boko Haram attacks and kidnappings in many communities, almost on a daily basis without confrontation, signalled that Borno state is losing ground’

“Nigeria’s military did not immediately respond to a request for comments. Boko Haram, which is based in Borno state, has adapted its tactics over time, including the use of drones for surveillance and attacks, the military said”.

Sahara Reporters relayed the Federal Government’s response to the Zulum alarm thus: “The President Bola Tinubu-led Nigerian Government has responded to comments made by the Borno state governor, Babagana Zulum, suggesting that the state may be losing control to Boko Haram insurgents. The government, through the Minister of Information, Mohammed Idris, disagreed with Zulum’s claim. The minister emphasized that the administration remains committed to combating terrorism and banditry across the nation. He stated: ‘The Tinubu administration is committed to eradicating acts of banditry and terrorism across the country. The success achieved by the security agencies in the last 18 months are an indication that, indeed, Nigeria is gradually returning to normalcy. Government calls on all, especially the sub-national governments, to join hands to ensure (the) rapid eradication of the remaining pockets of criminal elements wherever they may be’

“The Defence Headquarters also reacted, affirming that troops are making significant sacrifices and doing their best to restore peace in Borno and other troubled states. Director of Defence Media Operations… stressed the importance of recognizing the military’s efforts. He also said that the military is sacrificing a lot in the ongoing fight against terrorism.”

Now, let us attempt a content analysis of the various reports. Zulum kicked the ball rolling by raising the alarm. Obviously, both the government and military authorities did not take kindly to what he said. Did he speak in the open when they expected him to have spoken discreetly with the authorities, security being a very sensitive matter? From the tone of the military authorities, it is like their sacrifice in laying down their life fighting Boko Haram was not appreciated enough. Appreciation is good and it must be given so that the soldiers can be further encouraged to do more but having said that, what is their job if not to make sacrifices for the country? Didn’t they sign to lay down their life for their country? So, doing their job, they aren’t doing anyone a favour in the real sense of it.

But when the same military authorities say they are doing their best, that statement is loaded and must be interrogated. Are they getting the requisite arms and ammunitions? Do they have the numbers? Is motivation good? Is the budget committed to the war efforts adequate? Are the authorities putting square pegs in square holes or are we allowing the ubiquitous NIgerian system to undermine esprit in the military? Importantly, is the local population the military is fighting to protect cooperating with the same military or sabotaging their efforts by collaborating with the terrorists? We must also ask: What is the contribution of the state government to the war efforts? If Gov. Zulum is the chief security officer of his state, it should not only be in words but also in action.

I have gone to this length because, looking at the surface, there is absolutely nothing wrong with Zulum’s wake-up call. He made it at a Special Expanded Security Meeting attended by the appropriate military commands and top traditional rulers. Maybe the “offence” was that the media reported it! Maybe, they should have excused the media from the meeting. Seeing the way the military has taken exceptions to the report, it must have interpreted it as an indictment. But the governor did say there was an improvement; grounds were gained but, sadly, they were being lost again and in an alarming fashion. Some will say, when grounds were gained, did the governor call a press conference to salute the military? Is it only now that grounds were being lost that he must raise an alarm?

The Information minister’s response clearly shows that he sees Zulum’s statement as an attack on the “achievements” of the government in the area of pecking back Boko Haram. Yes, there might have been an improvement in the last 18 months in one theatre of the battle, which is Borno state or the northeast, but the situation is not the same in other parts of the country. My native Ondo State is one area where insecurity has reached an alarming stage in the past few months. Can it be true, then, the reports that terrorists fleeing the theatre of war in the North moved in droves southwards? It is trite that when you liberate a territory, you must hold it; otherwise, you may lose it again and be back to square one. And the latter state may be worse than the former because the enemy could come back better armed and more determined than before.

Jesus Christ illustrated this in Matthew 12: 43 - 45 thus: “ When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none. Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished. Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first…” Can this be what is happening in Borno state because Zulum reeled out names of locations where military formations had recently been dislodged by the terrorists?

As a peacemaker, hear my conclusion: The military have been heroic; let’s appreciate them. The Tinubu administration has recorded some successes; let’s encourage it to do more. Gov. Zulum was being alive to his responsibilities by raising the alarm; let’s not throw the baby away with the bathwater. We must quickly act to reverse any Boko Haram comeback.

This is one reason why the foot-dragging on state police must stop. With state police, Gov. Zulum will be able to raise his own forces to confront the terrorists and get the job done as he would want it; no longer will he rely solely on the military. Then, he will feel the heat that the military feel. And who feels it, says Rita Marley, knows it! The man who wears the shoe knows where it pinches!

Do you wonder what the future holds? Have you dreamed of being part of something bigger than yourself, something also rewarding beyond just buying and selling? Yes, have you considered a different path that offers you excellent career opportunities, future security, and the pride of representing the best interests of Anambra State and indeed the Southeast through strategic positioning in the national scheme of things? 

Some life-changing opportunities come once in a while that require smart decisions; otherwise, inaction today may lead to painful regrets tomorrow. For years now, our vibrant state, Anambra, has been unable to fill its quota in Nigeria's Armed Forces recruitment exercises due to abysmally low interest shown by our able youth. This means opportunities meant specifically for our young people are going unclaimed, while other regions in Nigeria eagerly step forward. Are we then going to keep beating the drums of marginalisation forever? 

Some analysts have often said that some of us have hesitated joining the Nigerian Armed Forces due to concerns about historical factors, ethnic prejudice, or other misconceptions bandied around. But our Armed Forces have always remained a truly national, progressive institution that values the contributions of every Nigerian, regardless of origin. By joining, Southeast youth not only secure their future but also ensure the region's voice and interests are represented and protected within this crucial national institution.

So, another golden opportunity is here and is within every Anambra youth’s grasp! The Nigerian Army has opened its doors once again, with the 89 Regular Recruiting Tech Recruitment Exercise commencing on March 31st and running until May 17th, 2025. This is not just another routine enlistment opportunity; it is a pathway to a dignified career filled with purpose and equal opportunity.

Consider all the real benefits that await you. A stable career with enhanced regular pay and allowances. Opportunities to further your education at no cost. The chance to build lifelong friendships with fellow Nigerians from diverse backgrounds. Comprehensive healthcare and insurance benefits. A clear path to homeownership in your desired location. And of course, pension and gratuity for your future security! 

If you are single, 18-22 years of age (or up to 26 years for those with technical skills), physically fit, and free of criminal convictions, this call is for you. Visit the Nigerian Army Recruitment website at https://recruitment.army.mil.ng to apply before May 17th. 

What is even more endearing is that the whole application and recruitment process is completely free! Shortlisted candidates will participate in the screening exercise in Anambra State from June 2nd to June 16th, 2025.

Ndi Anambra, our state needs you to encourage our youth to step forward and take their future by the uniform. Our country needs them. According to a Nigerian adage, if you are not present at a meeting of your people sharing some benefits, you can't complain about how the sharing is done! Let our youth step forward and claim their rightful place in Nigeria's future!