Over two million smallholder Nigerian farmers have accessed about $40.8 million in credit facilities through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s ‘Innovative Market-led Extension Delivery’ project in three years.

Mr Jean-Pierre Rousseau, Project Director, Winrock International, USAID, stated this on Monday at a media briefing ahead of the national impact summit on the project scheduled to be held on Wednesday in Abuja.

He said the project has exposed 2.021 million smallholder farmers to new information, technologies and services in Benue, Cross River, Delta, Ebonyi, Kaduna, Kebbi and Niger states, with greater access to improved agricultural technologies and financial access working with micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) on alternative models of extension delivery.

Mr Rousseau said the summit becomes necessary to share the project’s impact with other key stakeholders within and outside Nigeria to catalyse adoption and sustainability across the 36 states and the FCT.

Dr Ben Odoemena, Chief of Party, USAID Feed the Future Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services Activity in Nigeria, said the project has identified 39 most impactful practices (MIPs) as key extension innovation messages or business solutions that MSMEs need to reach smallholder farmers to enhance their capacity.

He said about 70% of the improved agricultural practices are climate smart to help farmers adapt or build resilience to climate change.

“A total of 1,088 gainful jobs were created by the MSMEs, mainly youths, to cope with increasing demand for agricultural inputs and extension by the expanding number of farmers in their business networks,” he added.

[DailyTrust]

The 2023 presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo, has accused the President Bola Tinubu-led government of worsening Nigeria’s economic woes.

Adebayo likened the government’s policies, including the removal of petrol subsidies and the floatation of the naira, to squeezing Nigerians “like oranges,” leaving them to bear the brunt of escalating hardship across the nation.

In this interview with the DAILY POST, he shared his alternative ideas that would have made life better and easier for Nigerians instead of the petrol subsidy removal and floating of the Naira by the current administration, which have brought untold hardship to Nigerians and brought the economy to its knees with the Naira falling to its lowest ebb in the international money market.

He spoke on a wide range of other issues, including the politics of oil refineries in Nigeria and the issue of tax incentives, among others.

Nigerians are currently going through hard times as a result of the poor economy; are people like you also affected by the harsh economy?

As leaders, whatever our people are going through, we are also going through it. The pain began to affect me even before the election because I already saw what was coming. So, it’s a case of a doctor who can see that the patient has cancer even though the patient is not aware.

Are you saying you saw this coming?

Not only did I see it coming, I also said that it was coming, and I said it everywhere. Nigeria has only one problem. All the problems they are telling you about Nigeria are just symptoms of one problem and that is bad governance. Like Mrs Oluremi Tinubu said, her husband is not the cause of the problem; he is only the symptom of the problem.

Talking about alternatives, the three major candidates of the APC, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and the Labour Party, LP, during the 2023 electioneering campaigns, all promised they would remove subsidy and float the currency. You didn’t go that route in your campaign, instead, you presented other alternatives. How do you think your alternatives would have had positive impacts on the economy if you had won the election?

The first thing to do in an economy is to realise that there is a lot of wealth trapped in the talent and energy of the people such that the first thing you need to do is to target the reduction of unemployment. The reason monetary economics is allowed is because the fundamental objective of monetary economics is to achieve good employment, not only of labour but also on all factors of production, so that you have allocative efficiencies that clearly want to make you want to invest your money in the economy and get people employed.

There are five areas you can look into. Agriculture is number one because it employs the highest number of people. It is also a low hanging fruit because it is easy to start. Anybody with a tractor and bucket can get started. It is scalable, so you cannot go into producing raw materials and other things that are additives. It will also make sure you govern your territory such that you are now in full control of your land, where a large portion of it are being shared with bandits since some of them are not in the control by the government. With agriculture, you will create employment and solve the problems of food as well. If you look at the incidence of food prices in the entire aggregation of inflation, it will come down.

Also, you have to invest in infrastructure. Investing in infrastructure means that you don’t allow people to do for themselves as individuals, things that we can all do collectively. That means you want to make sure that people travelling from one end of the country to the other don’t have to travel in their own vehicles because you have public transport. You need to give people good health. You need to build rural health facilities, as this will employ people and even keep people healthy and more productive. You need to make social investment in education. Many of the cases of unemployment which we are dealing with in our time will be rapidly dealt with, recruiting teachers. But the problems of the governors, even with all the money they are making now is that they don’t want to employ people because when they employ, there is less discretionary spending. This is because if you employ, you must pay as you are bound by contract. Some states, rather than increase compensation for their staff, tell their staff to come to work twice a week.

If you had won, you would not have removed subsidy on petrol and you would also not have floated the currency. What would you have done differently?

Look at the costing. I am taking their numbers so that they won’t say I’m second-guessing. When the noise first came out, it was under former President Goodluck Jonathan. At that time, it was travelling towards N1 trillion. At a time, it was over N1 trillion. When President Muhammadu Buhari came, it travelled all the way to N4 trillion in the budget, but there was some transparency in the lies such that you had to budget it in the books; it was there in the books. When we were campaigning, some were saying that if we were not careful, it would come to about N8 trillion.

For me, if we audit our consumption, definitely we don’t consume up to N2 trillion at the old price. Secondly, if we get our refineries to work, it will be less. And Nigerians need to know the reason our refineries are not working.

Can you explain further?

Let me give you a simple explanation. When you are trying to repair an existing refinery, and you have not finished repairing it and somebody gets an architect to draw a map of a refinery, you went to negotiate lands in many places, got lands, started construction, finished constructing, and now selling; you haven’t finished repairing the one already in existence. What does that tell you? It tells you that the priority is to make sure that those things don’t work.

What do you think is the problem? Is it interest within the government that doesn’t want the refineries to work or interest within the Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPCL?

The NNPCL is part of the government, and nobody gets appointed without the government’s approval. The idea is that they don’t want to run the government. They don’t want to run the economy. They are fighting to take control of the petroleum market. They see you as a customer, not as citizens. They don’t want to be responsible for ensuring you have a good life of training your children, you can go to work with seven percent of your salary to pay for transportation.

How did the government refuse to make the refineries work?

They need to create scarcity of work. These refineries were built years ago. The first one was part of our first development plan, the Port Harcourt Refinery, which was done during the Abubakar Tafawa Balewa era. Then, General Yakubu Gowon came and started building that of Warri. By that time, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo had taken over, and built Kaduna. The idea was that we would be building more because we are an energy-rich country, and we were not supposed to be worried about the small quantity being consumed in Nigeria. If we are productive, we should be consuming one million barrels a day. We were supposed to be exporting so that even the little part we are consuming locally will not be the essence of government. How many refineries are in Singapore? Go to the refinery market, with $2 billion to $3 billion you will build a good refinery. People call bogus figures here because the government is involved and they try to siphon the money. The refinery is an old technology distillation. The refinery in the Gulf of Beirut has been there since 1900. The one in Pennsylvania in was built in 1903, and they are still working. So, what is new about refinery? Talk to chemical engineers and ask them about the largest and most complex catalytic cracking unit. How much would it cost, even if they have to get it designed from the beginning? So, don’t let us pretend that we don’t know that we have been captured and our brothers and sisters in government who captured us want to squeeze us like oranges and squeeze the juice out of us, and probably, discard us when there is nothing more. They want to remove economic participation.

Perhaps you are right; that’s why they said recently that the rich may pay as much 25 percent on personal income tax…

I, Adewole Adebayo, government, come and tax me. I am ready to pay 50 percent of my income in taxes. I don’t mind, after all, in Norway, it is higher than that. I am spending billion, literally, to power my productive enterprises. But, you cannot pauperise us, take all the taxes and still not be responsible for anything.

Anybody who tells you that we should remove subsidy from an underdeveloped economy where productivity is low had F9 in economics. In China, with $10000, you can have a factory. All you need to do is to demonstrate to the city or the government there that you are producing this particular product. If they see the production plan, they will give you a factory on credit, and you start paying back. That is not available here in Nigeria. China is the largest producer of finished goods because of the subsidy. And you don’t have to be in China. If it’s the US, the first thing they welcome you with is a letter to come and borrow money. Sometimes, the Federal Reserve gives money to banks at negative interest to force them to lend money to people. During COVID 19, I was here in Nigeria. When I went to the US, I got stack of letters, awarding me money, wanting to give money to my law firm. They are subsidizing with credit.

If you go to Europe, they are subsidizing with social services. You the employer of labour, when your worker is sick, you are not the one to pay because every worker, every citizen has life insurance and other social services, so it is cheaper to hire labour there.

Come back to my beloved Nigeria. What is the incentive for productivity? Nothing, so you cannot compete. And the little that people are enjoying because we are petroleum rich country, we should now have low energy cost. That is what will drive you to say, let me go to Nigeria to take advantage of the low energy cost for my production.

How about offering a tax holiday?

Tax holiday is one of the ways through which they steal our money. Somebody will do 100 kilometres of poorly done cement road, very narrow and not standardised, and they will give the person billions of Naira for the same road that can be done by local government. Just collect your taxes.

Are you saying that it is the mindset of the people emerging as leaders that determines the level of productivity in government and governance?

These people don’t want to emerge as leaders. They want to take control of the tap of money. They don’t want to lead you because if you are leading, you look back sometimes to see whether your people are following you. This is a case of doing to you what the colonial master was planning to do when Jaja of Opobo, Nana of Itshekiri, Ovonranmwen Nogbaisi of Benin Empire, and everybody was fighting that the colonialists that they cannot come to our place and exploit us. That is why you have the statue of Madam Tinubu in Lagos. Now, you are not being exploited by these people, you are now being exploited by your own people who are exporting your own money overseas because they want their names to appear as one of the richest persons in town. We need to stop that because we are growing a large population that needs to be productive, and that needs to express their talents. We need to form a government that gives support services. The essence of government is to back you up.

I hope there won’t be a tipping point to all these, what do you think?

I don’t want us to reach a tipping point because the tipping point is a mirage. You would think people will never accept N500 per litre of fuel. They accepted over N1,000 and they are going towards N2,000 without anybody stopping them. We need to govern. That is the summary.

Any government that cannot help you to find your missing cat or dog after a while won’t be able to find a missing child. After a while, they won’t be able to find a missing town and after a while, a community will go. Going to the Eagle’s Square to hold the Bible or Quran and say a few words, salute the police and then disappear into the shadows, doesn’t make you a government. The people must feel your presence if truly you are governing.

Renowned economist, Prof Pat Utomi, has claimed that the nation is presently a failure, made worse by the lack of alternative thinking to turn things around.

According to Utomi, the lack of alternative thinking was worsened by a total capture of the legislature and the judiciary, as he described the present National Assembly as the worst thing that happened to the country.

He argued that the National Assembly, which should be the platform for robust debates to turn around the nation’s fortunes, had been captured.

Speaking with The PUNCH, the economist said Nigeria was a tragic failure because the political class and the elites, particularly the legal elite, are self-centred rather than thinking of the common good of the nation.

He stressed that there was a need for the leadership to sincerely lead by example, particularly cutting down on its lavish lifestyle, rather than calling on Nigerians to sacrifice.

“Nigeria is a failure right now; democracy is not working. We all know that; anybody who does not know that is fooling himself. We have total judicial capture; we have legislative capture, so there is no alternative thinking in the country.

“For me, the worst thing that has happened to the country is the National Assembly because that is where you should have the kind of debates that will lead you to options, but you can’t because the whole place is captured.

“These guys are just hustlers trying to get what they can out of the system without asking what will make the country work.

“When you have that kind of problem, you come to the point that James Robinson was making when he says a classic example is Nigeria which knows what to do but cannot seem to do it. You need, in a time like this, a certain kind of mindset.

“A local example is Olusegun Obasanjo in 1976/1977 when the oil crisis began to slide. He decided that we would go to low-profile mode. As head of state, his car was a Peugeot 504; he cut his travels.

“Anybody who watches the way people in power spend public resources cannot take seriously any statement that this is a time of sacrifice. So, the problem begins with them. Intense political commitment is not there,” he said.

The economist added, “You cannot save an economy when the political actors are on a binge and you will not have the kind of consequences that you have today for the economy.

“It is an intensely political process to turn around the economy. The Nigerian political class needs to recognise that we are in a moral equivalence of a war. And when a country is at war, it pulls together. Nigerian politicians still think they are on a binge.

“So, they are all running in different directions, and nobody is sitting down to forge a national consensus on how to solve this problem. When you have the moral equivalence of war, what you need is to set up a war room, and war cabinet and bring everybody together to say, how do we fix these problems.”

He stressed the need for intense political will to forge a national consensus to solve the nation’s problems, as against politicians stockpiling money to prosecute their next electioneering quest.

Asked if the adherence of Nigeria to policies of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank was a bane of Nigeria’s economic challenges, Utomi said the world bodies would usually provide templates, but it was up to nations to analyse such templates in line with their local peculiarities.

He said the challenge was whether Nigeria deployed the requisite local, intellectual knowledge to evaluate IMF templates in the interest of the common good.

“IMF can have a template, but what is responsible for the outcome is not their template; it is how local actors politically live their way through doing the right things for growth and development for their country. IMF and World Bank have got it wrong many times; it does not mean that their intention is not right.

“It means that they just have formulas and it is not an exact science. So what is desperately needed is for there to be a local, intellectual capacity to evaluate those templates and act in the interest and good of the local environment.

“This is where Nigeria has been a tragic failure because the political class and its elites, particularly the legal elite, have not acted as patriots either because they are ignorant or because they are too pathologically self-centred to think of the common good.”

[Punch]

The national insult and danger Libya subjected Nigeria and the Super Eagles recently was hard to explain. The account of the Tunisian pilot who flew the Nigerian team to Libya on the circumstances that led to the unexpected diversion of their flight to a remote airport, Al-Abraq, instead of their intended destination, Benghazi, was eye-opening and shocking.

While most Nigerians focused on the insult the Libyan action meant to Nigeria and the footballers, few people focused on the danger and the close shave with death that diversion was. What if that plane had crashed during landing and killed all the Nigerian players?

In a video interview the pilot posted online, he exonerated himself from the decision and said that the decision to divert the plane came from Libyan authorities. He said: “The flight plan was to land at Benghazi, Benina, and we had the approval from the Libyan Civil Aviation Authority to do so. However, when we began our descent, they instructed us to divert to Al-Abraq, almost 150 miles away, around 300 kilometres east. It wasn’t even (listed as) our alternate airport, something which is not good.”

According to the report made by The PUNCH on the video, the pilot described the diversion as potentially risky, citing the fuel calculations made for the initial destination. Imagine if the aviation fuel was not enough to take the plane to an unplanned destination 300 kilometres away. But that was not all.

The pilot said he repeatedly questioned the directive because of the inherent dangers in it. “In aviation, we have our flight plan. We calculate the fuel to our destination; so we have to avoid this kind of thing because it may make a breach to safety,” he said.

“When I asked to land in Benghazi according to my flight plan and according to my authorisation, they said no, it’s from the highest authority, you have to land in Al-Abraq.”

“Everything is registered in aviation, we cannot hide anything, so I asked them several times, at least eight times, and I warned them, probably I will be in trouble for fuel; they said it’s from highest authority, you cannot land in Benghazi, you have to divert immediately to Al-Abraq.”

The pilot described at Al-Abraq airport as a poorly equipped domestic airport.

“There is no ILS (Instrument Landing System), no air navigation approach, no VHR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range). We had to make a visual landing, which is particularly difficult by night with marginal weather.”

He explained that the airport’s lack of facilities left them with “no second chances” if something had gone wrong with the landing. Thankfully, the pilot was familiar with the region, having worked there for two years with a Tunisian company, which helped him to land safely.

Just think for a moment what could have happened if that plane had crashed with the full Nigerian team aboard. What would have been the explanation from Libya? That they wanted to frustrate the Nigerian team and make it easier to beat them in their return leg for the 2025 AFCON?

Why go to the extreme of placing lives in danger over a football match? It is even worse that football has never been the forte of Libya as it is rare to hear the name Libya in any football competition in Africa at whatever level or gender.

But Libya was not done. They technically placed the Super Eagles team under house arrest at the airport for over 20 hours. Members of the team were not allowed to step out of the airport. They were provided with no food or water. They slept in the airport lounge. The NFF eventually had to withdraw from the match and return home.

Curiously, Libya claimed that what happened to the Nigerian team is not unusual in aviation. It noted that something similar happened to its team a week earlier in Nigeria. The Libyan Football Federation condemned Nigeria’s decision to withdraw from the planned 2025 Africa Cup of Nations qualifier in Libya, threatening to take legal action to protect its national team’s interests.

Ironically, some Nigerians – perhaps because of a desire to be non-parochial online or as a result of lack of information – made posts saying that Nigeria had been paid in its own coin. They shared photos of Libyans at Port Harcourt airport when they visited Nigeria for the first leg of the AFCON match. But that was gross misrepresentation of facts.

The first point was that it was not Nigeria that diverted the aeroplane of the Libyan national team to Port Harcourt, which is about 150 kilometres to Uyo Township Stadium, the venue of the match. The Nigerian Football Federation communicated the venue of the match to its Libyan counterpart. Uyo has an international airport which all foreign teams coming to play use.

Perhaps in its desire not to allow Nigeria to affect its team with juju, the Libyan FA did not disclose to its Nigerian counterpart its itinerary. Libyans made their planned visit to Nigeria without involving Nigeria. They were informed of the venue of the match. But they chose to fly to Port Harcourt instead of Uyo, the venue of the match. According to the NFF, the Libyan Football Federation informed the NFF that their contingent would be landing in Port Harcourt instead of Uyo merely two hours before the team arrived in Nigeria.

In spite of that, the NFF still quickly got the authorities to grant their aircraft movement permit from Port Harcourt to Uyo. However, the LFF rejected the charter flight arrangement from Port Harcourt to Uyo obviously because of the fee and chose to travel by road. The LFF rejected the buses hired by the NFF and chose to hire theirs. Furthermore, the LFF discountenanced the NFF’s advice not to travel by night due to insecurity. Because of their insistence to travel by night, the NFF provided security, knowing that if any harm came upon them, Nigeria would bear the bad name.

It is unfair for some Nigerians to try to rationalise what happened to the Super Eagles in Libya with what happened to Libyans in Nigeria. There are many things wrong with Nigerian leadership or sports management, but one thing nobody can ever accuse Nigerians of is trying to use underhand tactics to frustrate visiting sports teams.

Nigeria is the only country I have seen where the home fans can start booing the home team if it is not playing well while supporting the visiting team. I have never seen it anywhere else. If the Nigerian team does not play well and gets defeated, the fans will take their anger on their team and never on the visiting team. No visiting team has ever been attacked in Nigeria. But that is not the case with some other countries that Nigerian teams have visited.

But what happened to the Super Eagles in Libya was purely orchestrated by the Libyans. It was deliberate. It was shameful, disrespectful and hostile. But most importantly, it was dangerous. It could have ended tragically with the loss of the Nigerian contingent.

What Libya did was an embarrassment to Africa and African football. The Confederation of African Football gave the Libyan and Nigerian federations until October 20 to submit all necessary documentation concerning the incident. All eyes are on CAF to announce its ruling. But whatever CAF does, it should not treat this matter with levity. CAF needs to descend hard on Libya to send a warning to other countries which may be thinking of doing something similar to a visiting team with the hope of wearing them out and beating them easily.

A bill for the establishment of Bola Ahmed Tinubu Federal University of Languages has reportedly passed the first reading at the House of Representatives.  Section 2 part I of the bill,  which is sponsored by the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, and eight others, provides that the university, when established, shall encourage “the advancement of learning and to hold out to all persons without distinction of race, creed, sex or political conviction, the opportunity of acquiring a higher education in Nigerian languages and cultures”. It further claims that the university is aimed at: “Producing socially mature persons with capacity to communicate, understand, and use Nigerian languages for national development.”

There are several questions begging for answers with respect to the proposed university: One, is the question of whether there is really any need for a University of Languages considering that many of the 62 Federal and 63 State Universities in the country have departments of Languages or Institutes of African Studies that are already providing the services that the proposed new university will purportedly offer. What is even more ridiculous is that there is also a federally owned National Institute for Nigerian Languages, NINLAN, which was set up in Aba, Abia State, via Decree 117 of December 30, 1993.

The Institute was aimed at being the “apex institution for research, teaching, documentation, and coordination of studies in Nigerian languages”, according to NINLAN’s website. Following from this, it is obvious that the promoters of the Tinubu University of Languages are either unaware of the existence of NINLAN, or if they did, failed to clearly establish the value addition of the proposed Tinubu University of Languages to both the mandate of NINLAN and the various institutes and departments that offer similar services in the country’s institutions of higher learning.  

Two, in terms of value addition, the promoters of the proposed university  also seem unsure of what they really want to accomplish – besides the obvious facts that they want to set up a Federal University, which will be sited in Abia State, the home state of the Deputy Speaker, and which will be named after the President.  For instance, the promoters claimed that the university, when established, will act “as agents and catalysts, through postgraduate training, research and innovation for the effective and economic utilization, exploitation and conservation of Nigeria’s natural, economic and human resources”.

How studying indigenous languages will lead to the “effective and economic utilization, exploitation and conservation of Nigeria’s natural, economic and human resources”, remains unclear. It is equally unclear how training in Nigerian languages will lead to “producing socially mature persons”.  There are several other bogus claims about what the proposed university could achieve that one gets the impression that whoever wrote the concept paper merely worked from answers to questions, and had very little knowledge of what a university education, or research in indigenous languages, is all about.

Three, a related question is whether establishing a University of Languages is really the best way to promote interest in local languages. If the aim of the proposed university is to encourage people to learn how to speak local languages, then a university education is not required for this. If this was really the aim, the sponsors could achieve the aim better by setting up, or encouraging the setting up of centres in local communities where local languages of interest could be learnt. The sponsors could also invest in the development of apps for teaching local languages or promote a number of existing apps that provide such services.  If, on the other hand, research in indigenous Nigerian languages is their main objective, then endowing chairs in various Departments of Languages or Institutes of African Studies in our existing institutions of higher learning could do the job better and cheaper. 

Four, how many Nigerian languages could realistically be taught in the proposed university?  Or will it be just the usual case of the dominant languages in the country (WAZOBIA)getting disproportionate attention? If that becomes the case,  as it is likely to be,  given that it will not be feasible to offer courses in the country’s over 500 indigenous languages and dialects, then the proposed university, rather than facilitating cultural awareness and unity – as claimed by the sponsors of the bill – will unwittingly become a tool of disunity because speakers of the languages left out are not likely to have any emotional buy-in to the university. 

Five, is the moral issue of naming institutions or monuments after a sitting President or Governor. In most climes, monuments are named after leaders have left office – not when they are in office. Even worse is to name an institution after a President who is still less than two years in office, and who is yet to find his bearing in the office, and who is generally  mocked as “T-Pain” for the unprecedented hardship his government has brought to Nigerians. If I were President Tinubu, I would distance myself from any effort to name institutions or monuments after me or even give me awards, including by the Bretton Woods institutions. Such honours are best savoured if done when the person is not in a position to extend favours.

Generally, monuments should be built to immortalise an idea not to humour those in power. In this connection, one may want to know what Tinubu has done in the area of promoting local languages that should warrant a University of Languages being named after him. The whole bill therefore oozes of sycophancy taken to a ridiculous level. I know that some Nigerian Governors have named institutions and monuments after themselves. But that is pure narcissism, and if people do not resist such, it is because they have either been cowed or simply do not care. 

Six, it may also not be out of place to interrogate the possible motives of the sponsors of the bill. Since the said university is to be sited in Abia State where the Deputy Speaker comes from, it may be safe to assume that he is the arrowhead of the bill, and consequently speculate on his possible motives: Is the Deputy Speaker following the path of some Governors who wrongly believe  that their legacies will be measured only by building enduring physical structures that will outlive them, often  white elephant projects such  as airports  that are hardly viable  and universities that are not properly funded?

Does the Deputy Speaker hope that by naming the proposed university after President Tinubu, he would tickle his ego, and buy the President’s support for the project? Is the Deputy Speaker hoping that by ingratiating himself to the president he would secure his position in the event of the president being re-elected in 2027? Is the Deputy Speaker eyeing a governorship seat in Abia State, and believes that the Ahmed Bola Tinubu University of Languages would be his evidence of ‘concrete achievement’ while in office?  And what, if one may ask, has become of the Deputy Speaker’s Peace in the South East Project, PISE-P, which he launched with fanfare in the ancient town of Bende, Abia State on December 29, 2023?

Seven, Shakespeare was right that there is no art to find the mind’s construction on the face, so I admit that all the above possible motives are mere speculations. But whatever the Deputy Speaker hopes to achieve by the Ahmed Bola Tinubu Federal University of Languages, he should take lessons from other Nigerian politicians whose sycophancy cut short their own career. A typical example is Ibrahim Mantu, the former Deputy President of the Senate (2001-2007). During Obasanjo’s alleged third term plot, Mantu was thought to be the arrowhead, and he boldly claimed that he would give his life for Obasanjo.

However, no sooner did Obasanjo leave office than Mantu, eager to rehabilitate himself politically from the damage his championing the hugely unpopular tenure elongation plot had done to his image and career, turned against Obasanjo. Nigeria’s political ecosystem is unfortunately littered with several Mantus. And this should forewarn both the sycophant and the leader being humoured. Given the transient nature of power, sycophancy, beyond a certain octave, is a sure career killer. 

*Jideofor Adibe is Professor of Political Science at Nasarawa State University, Keffi.

…Asks court order to void import licenses
…Demands N100bn damages for alleged sabotage

Dangote Refinery and Petrochemicals said yesterday it was settling out of court with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPCL, and six others over import licences granted them by the Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, NMDPRA, to import petrol into the country.

Recall that the company had approached a Federal High Court in Abuja, praying it to nullify the licenses and also award it N100billion damages against the 1st defendant which is the NNPCL
However, in a statement last night, Dangote said it was ready to settle the case amicably with NNPCL and other defendants in what it described as an old case filed in June.

The statement, signed by the Group Chief Branding and Communications Officer, Anthony Chiejine, read: ‘’This is an old issue that started in June and culminated in a matter filed on Sept 6, 2024.

‘’Currently, the parties are in discussion since President Bola Tinubu’s directive on crude oil and refined product sales in naira initiative, which the Federal Executive Council, FEC, approved.
‘’We have made tremendous progress in that regard and events have overtaken this development. No party has been served with court processes and there is no intention of doing so. We have agreed to put a halt to the proceedings.

‘’It is important to stress that no orders have been made and there are no adverse effects on any party. We understand that once the matter comes up in January 2025, we will be in a position to formally withdraw the matter in court.’’

Dangote had in the suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, queried the propriety of the licence issued to the defendants to bring refined petroleum products into the country when there is no shortfall in its production.

Other defendants in the suit are the Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, NMDPRA, AYM Shafa Limited, A.A. Rano Limited, T. Time Petroleum Limited, 2015 Petroleum Limited as well as Matrix Petroleum Services Limited.

The plaintiff is equally praying the court to award N100 billion in damages against the NMDPRA for allegedly continuing to issue import licenses to NNPCL and the other defendants for the import of petroleum products such as Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) and Jet Fuel (aviation turbine fuel) into Nigeria.

It told the court that the licences were issued to the defendants, “despite the production of AGO and Jet-A1 that exceeds the current daily consumption of petroleum products in Nigeria by the Dangote Refinery.”

Specifically, Dangote Refinery, among other things, applied for an order of injunction, restraining the 1st defendant (NMDPRA) from further issuing and/or renewing import licenses to the 2nd to 7th defendants or other companies to import petroleum products.

It further sought general damages in the sum of N100 billion against the 1st defendant, as well as an order of the court directing the 1st defendant to seal off all tank farms, storage facilities, warehouses, and stations used by the defendants for the storage of all refined petroleum products imported into Nigeria.

Other reliefs the plaintiff prayed for, included, “a declaration that by the provisions of Section 8(1) of the Nigerian Export Processing Zone Act (NEPZA), Sections 23(h) and 55(1) of the Companies Income Tax Act (CIT Act), Paragraph 6 of the Second Schedule to the CIT Act, Regulation 54(2)(a)(i) of the Dangote Industries Free Zone Regulation 2020, and the Finance Act, the plaintiff, being an entity duly registered as a Free-Zone Enterprise, is exempted from all federal, state, and local government taxes, levies, and other rates.

“A declaration that it is against the NEPZA Act, CIT Act, Finance Act, and Dangote Industries Free Zone Regulation 2020, as well as legislative intent, for the 1st Defendant to impose or threaten to impose on the plaintiff an additional financial obligation of a 0.5% levy meant for off-takers of petroleum products directly and an additional 0.5% wholesale levy in favour of the Midstream Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund, MDGIF.

“An order of mandatory injunction directing the 1st Defendant to withdraw immediately all import licenses issued to the 2nd-7th defendants and other companies other than the plaintiff and other local refineries for the purpose of importing refined petroleum products into Nigeria.”

“An order of injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from imposing and demanding a 0.5% levy meant for off-takers of petroleum products directly and an additional 0.5% wholesale levy in favour of MDGIF or any other levy or sum against the plaintiff.”

According to the plaintiff, NMDPRA acted in breach of Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act by issuing licenses for the importation of petroleum products to the defendants.

In the processes filed through a team of lawyers led by Mr Ogwu Onoja, SAN, the plaintiff, such licenses ought to be issued only when there is a shortfall of petroleum products in the country.

It urged the court to declare that NMDPRA violates its statutory responsibilities under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) for not encouraging local refineries such as the one owned by the plaintiff.

In an affidavit deposed to by the Group General Manager of Government and Strategic Relations at Dangote Refinery, Ahmed Hashem, he told the court that import licenses granted to other companies by NMDPRA for the importation of AGO and Jet-A1 are crippling the plaintiff’s business which it committed substantial financial resources in billions of US dollars.

He averred that the plaintiff’s products are largely left unpatronized due to the actions of NMDPRA.
More so, the deponent told the court that NMDPRA has threatened to impose and demand a 0.5% levy on the plaintiff on wholesales and off-takers, as well as another 0.5% levy on wholesales to the Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund (MDGIF) via a letter dated June 10, 2024, contrary to statutory provisions that limit the implementation of levies on transactions within Free Zones.

He alleged a grand conspiracy and concerted effort by International Oil Companies and interests, in conjunction with the defendants, who are unhappy that Nigeria has an indigenous refinery ready to solve the lingering energy crisis and save the economy.

“The intervention of the honourable court has become necessary to stem the incessant violation of statutory provisions by the 1st Defendant in favour of other entities such as the 2nd to 7th defendants,” the plaintiff added.

Meanwhile, there were indications that the matter may not be heard by the court as a member of the plaintiff’s legal team, Mr George Ibrahim, SAN, notified the court yesterday that efforts to amicably resolve the issue were afoot.

He said the defendants had indicated their intention to explore an out-of-court settlement.
Consequently, Justice Inyang Ekwo adjourned the matter till January 20, 2025, for a report of settlement.

[Vanguard]

Nyesom Wike, the minister of the federal capital territory (FCT), says he revoked the title of an abandoned land allocated to Julius Berger Nigeria Plc to construct quarters for judges in Abuja.

Wike spoke in Abuja on Monday at the official flag-off ceremony of the design and construction of judges’ quarters.

In September, the federal executive council (FEC) approved the construction of 40 houses in Abuja for judges in the country.

Wike had told journalists that the judges’ quarters would be sited in the Kantampe district of Abuja, noting that 20 units would be allocated to judges of the FCT high court, 10 to those of the federal high court, and 10 to the judges of court of appeal.

The FCT minister said the project is expected to be completed in 15 months.

Wike said he was driving around the FCT to find suitable land space for the judges’ housing project and sighted the plot allocated to the construction company about 20 years ago, which was yet to be developed.

“When we were looking for land to build, I was driving around looking for empty land. And I got here; I saw this big land, and I saw the big post, ‘Julius Berger’,” he said.

“I didn’t talk. I called the director of lands and asked, ‘who owns that land?’ he said, Julius Berger. When was it allocated? He said about 15 to 20 years ago. 15, 20 years ago? Nothing has been done? I didn’t bother.

“So, I invited the MD Julius Berger to come. He came, and we had dinner. I didn’t talk about the land. The next day, he was in the office, and he saw the revocation letter as a matter of public interest.

“He called me and said, ‘but I had dinner with you.’ I said, ‘Yes; we had dinner, but we didn’t discuss the land’.

“The point is that—how will the government allocate land for more than 20 years for organisations to develop and they did not develop it? Thank God, they did not develop it, and now we can have it.”

[TheCable]

The Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation (IGET) is pleased to announce that its Founder, Professor Kingsley Moghalu, has been appointed as the inaugural President of the newly established African School of Governance (ASG). The ASG, launched today in Kigali, Rwanda, is a pan-African graduate institution designed to deliver world-class public policy education, research, and engagement programs aimed at transforming governance and leadership across the continent.

The initiative brings together visionaries committed to creating a sustainable governance model rooted in African realities. The ASG initiative was founded by H.E. Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda, H.E. Hailemariam Desalegn, former Prime Minister of Ethiopia (both co-founders of the ASG Foundation) in consultation with other African leaders, academicians and philanthropists.

ASG is supported by the Mastercard Foundation as part of its Young Africa Works strategy, which aims to enable 30 million young Africans, 70 percent of whom are women, to access dignified and fulfilling work opportunities by 2030.

Professor Moghalu’s appointment as President of the African School of Governance represents a significant milestone, not only for ASG but also for IGET. As the Founder of IGET, Professor Moghalu has long been at the forefront of promoting good governance, sustainable development, and economic transformation in Africa. His new role at ASG underscores his continued commitment to advancing these ideals on a larger scale, with a particular focus on equipping the next generation of African leaders with the knowledge, skills, and mindsets needed to address the continent's most pressing governance challenges.

Speaking on his appointment, Professor Moghalu said: “The establishment of ASG is a powerful expression of a clear vision on the part of the founding  leaders. I share this vision of a transformed Africa driven by competent leadership and  governance, and I am honored to have been tasked with leading ASG’s critical contribution to  making that vision a reality.”

A New Chapter for IGET

Professor Moghalu’s leadership at ASG marks an exciting new chapter for IGET, which will continue to focus on its core mission of driving policy innovation and economic transformation across Africa. With Professor Moghalu at the helm of affairs at ASG, IGET under a new management will yield to the powerful synergy of combining IGET’s deep expertise in governance and development research with ASG’s academic excellence and leadership training.

IGET will remain a key player in promoting governance reforms, policy research, and capacity building across the continent. The envisioned partnership between IGET and ASG opens up new opportunities for collaboration on research initiatives, policy engagement, and leadership programs aimed at tackling Africa’s governance challenges. This will enhance IGET’s impact and further its mission to transform governance and foster economic development across the continent.

About IGET

The Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation (IGET) is a leading think tank dedicated to promoting governance reforms, sustainable economic development, and policy innovation in Africa. Through its research, policy advocacy, and capacity-building programs, IGET aims to contribute to the transformation of African societies and economies.

About the African School of Governance (ASG)

ASG offers academic programs, including a Master of Public Administration (MPA) and Executive Master of Public Administration (EMPA), designed to equip emerging leaders with the skills and knowledge needed for effective leadership across Africa. In addition to its educational programs, ASG is committed to advancing governance through its research centers and policy engagement initiatives.

For more information, please contact:

Evelyn Dan Epelle, FMNES

MD/CEO

Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation (IGET)

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Chiemerie Ken-Ahukannah

Executive Officer (Administration)

Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation (IGET)

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A PAPER DELIVERED BY SONNY IROCHE, THE KEYNOTE LECTURER AT THE 64th FOUNDERS’ DAY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2024

Title: Resetting the Falling Standards of Education in Nigeria: Addressing the Challenges and Embracing the Future

Protocols:

• The Pro chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, General Ike Nwachukwu (Rtd)

• Professor Uche Azikiwe, the widow of Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, the first president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Founder, University of Nigeria.Ag. Vice-Chancellor, Professor Polycarp Chigbu

• Members
• Deputy Vice Chancellors
• Principal Officers of the university (the registrar, the bursar, librarian)
• Members of the Senate
• Deans, Directors, Professors, Lecturers
• Fellow Alumni
• All other Academic & Non - Academic Staff
• Our highly valued students (my fellow Lions & Lionesses)

Please pardon me, if I have inadvertently breached any protocols within the university system, despite my best efforts to adhere to the established norms in addressing this august occasion.

After a long journey from Oxford through Lagos, I have finally arrived in the beautiful city of Nsukka—my alma mater. Let me set the tone of this lecture and our discussion today, by referencing the second stanza of the university anthem that goes thus: Hail Varsity of Nigeria, my Alma Mater: Hail her and rejoice for her lofty plans: The Varsity that is sited on soft green hills. Hail her and rejoice for her beauty sake. Hail Varsity of our glory, the pride of our land: Hail her and rejoice for her light will shine: Hail Varsity per excellence our dream come true: Hail her and rejoice for the giant awakes.

Let me now pause at this moment to express my deepest gratitude to God Almighty for granting all those who have travelled to Nsukka this day journey mercies, and the opportunity to witness another day. For me , this moment is both nostalgic and humbling at the same time, as I cast my mind back to 1974, when as a 17-year old, I matriculated in this university, having just passed both my O’Level WASC from Government College Umuahia and the University entrance examination. Thereafter, for four uninterrupted years, I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Zoology, in 1978.

Before we dive deep into today’s discussions, I would like to share a brief overview of the contemporary history of the University of Nigeria. This is especially relevant for our young students and serves as a tribute to some of our past heroes, such as Dr Michael Okpara, Emir Ado Bayero, Igwe Vincent Ike, who served as the Sole Administrator of the university, Professor Echeruo, and Professor Gilbert Kodilinye, who in 1952, became the first Nigerian professor of Medicine at the University of London, among many others, who worked tirelessly to restore the university in the aftermath of the Nigeria-Biafra war.

Shortly after the war, the university had three campuses: Nsukka, Enugu, and Calabar. The period from 1967 to 1970, marked by the Nigeria-Biafra war, remains a dark chapter in our history. Many of those that were involved in the Biafra Research and Production (RAP) were scientists and professors from this institution, and a significant number of the officers in the Biafran army were also undergraduates. We take a moment to honor the memories of those who lost their lives during that conflict, and we pray that their souls may find eternal peace. Amen.

At the end of the Nigeria-Biafra war in 1970, it was alleged that the federal government was contemplating the closure of the University of Nigeria. It was the late Emir of Kano, Ado Bayero, who had earlier in 1967 been appointed as Chancellor by his close ally, Odimegwu Ojukwu, then governor of the Eastern Region, who intervened to prevent such drastic measures. Emir Ado Bayero, along with the governor of the former South Eastern State, Brigadier Eugene Esuene, staunchly advocated for the university’s continued operation. Esuene further insisted on the establishment of a campus of the university in Calabar, leading to the admission of the first cohort of students in the Calabar campus in 1973, with the last set of UNN students admitted in 1975. From 1976, with the introduction of the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) the University of Calabar as a separate entity, was established, marking a significant moment in our educational landscape. I was among the students admitted to the Calabar campus, as the second set in 1974.

As we convene today to honor the rich legacy of our university and look towards its promising future, I am overwhelmed with nostalgia and a sense of purpose. It is therefore a privilege to address you not only as an alumnus of this esteemed institution but also as a devoted advocate for the advancement of education in Nigeria. Over sixty years ago, our founding fathers, led by the visionary leader, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, envisioned the establishment of the University of Nigeria, drawing motivation from the Michigan State University, USA. The opening convocation, addresses were delivered by the Chairman of the Provincial Council, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, the first President of the Federation of Nigeria, and by John A. Hannah, President of Michigan State University. The motto of the university is "To Restore the Dignity of Man”, which is rooted in Count Giovani Pico Della Mirandola’s 15th century oration, ‘De Dignitate Hominis’ (‘On the Dignity of Man’). As we reflect on our journey thus far, we must ask ourselves, the question:

Have we truly answered the call? Today’s lecture will delve into significant insights from influential thinkers, like Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, Dr Nelson Mandela, and Alvin Toffler. Dr. Azikiwe famously stated, “Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today.” Hear Mandela on education: “ Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world “.

Complementing these sentiments, Toffler warned that “The illiterate of the twenty-first century will not be those who cannot read or write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” A central theme in Toffler’s work is the notion that knowledge serves as the cornerstone of powerful societies, surpassing even the significance of labor and resources. He argued that individuals, organizations, and civilizations that fail to adapt to the rapid influx of new information risk falling into decline.

All these perspectives on education shed light on the stark contrast between knowledge-driven nations and the development disparities observed between the global north and the global south. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in a notable speech at a Labor Party gathering, underscored the critical importance of education by declaring that “education, education, and education” are the top three priorities for his nation. This prompts us to question why successive administrations in Nigeria have consistently overlooked the education sector.

Thankfully, the rise of private education—akin to the emergence of private banks and the privatization of certain public entities in the country, has stepped in to fill the gap. But the legacy government owned universities must not be allowed to die. Because not all who seek education can afford the fees of the private universities.

In recent years, the educational landscape, and indeed most sectors in Nigeria have faced several challenges that have hindered our progress and tarnished the legacy of excellence that we once prided ourselves on. Today, I want to discuss these issues candidly, and I urge each of you to join me in a clarion call for reform and revitalization of our universities, and the education

sector as a whole.

1. The Fall of Educational Standards

To begin, we must confront the undeniable reality: the standards of public sector-driven education in Nigeria are in decline. Successive governments have promised reforms, yet we find ourselves still grappling with low budgetary provisions, as a percentage of our annual budget, outdated curricula, overcrowded and sometimes dilapidated classrooms, and underqualified educators. The failure to implement sustainable policies has left our educational system in disarray, and it is time for us to demand accountability and action policies to address this unfortunate situation.

1. De-centralization of Admissions & the Quota System: A Double-Edged Sword One of the most pressing issues that has marred Nigeria’s educational system is the continued centralization of admissions through the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB). While this system was originally intended to streamline the admission process, it has inadvertently created bottlenecks and inequities. The situation is further exacerbated by the quota system, which lowers the admission threshold for applicants from some so-called educationally disadvantageous states, to the detriment of those that have been classified as educationally advantageous state, with much higher admission threshold. These have over the years denied deserving students from placements in federal educational institutions and such students find themselves trapped in a cycle of rejections, while the meritocracy we aspire to, remains elusive. We must advocate for a more equitable and transparent admission process that truly reflects the capabilities of our students, allowing them to thrive in an environment that nurtures their potential. I am therefore, calling on the federal government to democratize admissions into Federal colleges, Universities, and other tertiary institutions, to allow them set their own examinations, and choose their admission criteria, while reinforcing the educational regulatory framework and authorities.

The quota system in admissions to federal educational institutions and government departments has, in many ways, outlived its original intent and usefulness. What the policy makers thought at the time was necessary has over time now, not yielded the desired result but has stunted the quality of public education in Nigeria. Instead of fostering an equitable environment that allows the best talents in Nigeria to emerge and actualize their full potential, the system has inadvertently elevated mediocrity while undermining the principles of meritocracy. Furthermore, we must consider whether the states that were previously educationally disadvantaged have made sufficient strides to catch up. At the same time, we must ask if the states that have historically enjoyed educational advantages have contributed their fair share to our federation. A thoughtful review and potential reform of the quota system could help ensure that we prioritize excellence and merit, ultimately paving the way for a more

dynamic and competitive educational landscape in Nigeria.

For Nigeria to progress and effectively transition into the imminent Fourth Industrial Revolution, that will be catalyzed by advancements in Artificial Intelligence and STEM education, a review of the university curriculum and the 1999 Constitution (as amended) are imperative.

III. The Funding Crisis: A Budgetary Black Hole

Moreover, we must address the dearth of funding that has plagued our universities. The inadequate budgetary provisions for education have left institutions scrambling to provide basic amenities, let alone invest in innovative research and development. Our GDP to education ratio is alarmingly low, reflecting a disinterest in the future of our nation’s intellectual capital. We must mobilize resources and campaign for increased investment in education—because without funding, we cannot fuel the engines of growth and development.

The 2024 Nigeria budget allocated 7.9% of its total budget to education. While this was a slight improvement over precious years, it is still grossly inadequate. At $23 per capita, public expenditure on education in Nigeria, is inadequate by any standard. Of the $23 per capita spending on education, states spend $14, leaving the federal government with only $9 per capita. As a result, Nigeria’s public tertiary institutions educators are some of the least paid in the country.

1. The Dark Shadow of Misconduct in Academia Adding to the woes of our educational system are the allegations of "sex for marks" and/or “financial gratification for marks”, that tarnish the integrity of some Tertiary institutions. Such unethical practices undermine the very foundation of education and discourage talented students from pursuing their dreams. We must collectively reject these behaviors and advocate for stringent policies that promote transparency and accountability in our academic environments.

As an antidote for such malpractices, I would like to advocate the introduction of the use of anonymous marking of examination assessments in the mold of what is obtainable in universities in the western world with the Autonomous Students Assessment Management System (SAMS). This method uses anonymous numbers and not the student’s identity submitted through a laptop and other computer devices. That way the identities of students are protected from sexual predator or vindictive lecturers.

1. Incessant ASUU Strikes: The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) in Nigeria has been known for its frequent strikes, which are typically called to protest against various issues related

to funding, salary discrepancies, poor infrastructure, and other conditions affecting the quality of education in Nigerian universities. These strikes have become a persistent issue in the Nigerian educational landscape, often lasting for months and leading to significant disruptions in academic calendars.

Key Points on the Persistent ASUU Strikes:

• Historical Context: ASUU was established in 1978 to advocate for the rights of university lecturers. Over the decades, the union has launched numerous strikes, with the most significant ones occurring in the 1990s and 2000s.

• Reasons for Strikes:

- Funding Issues: ASUU often strikes when the government fails to meet funding agreements or allocate sufficient budgets for education.

- Salary and Benefits: Disputes over salaries, allowances, and benefits for lecturers are common triggers for strikes.

- Infrastructure: Poor facilities and inadequate resources in universities have led to calls for

better investment in the education sector.

• Impact on Education:

- Disruption of Academic Calendars: Strikes can lead to prolonged interruptions in academic sessions, causing delays in graduation and affecting students' overall educational progress.

- Quality of Education: Continuous strikes and disruptions can negatively impact the quality of education, as students may miss crucial learning opportunities and resources.

- Brain Drain: Prolonged strikes and poor working conditions have contributed to a brain drain, as many qualified lecturers seek opportunities abroad for better pay and working conditions.

- Student Frustration: Students often express frustration over the uncertainty and instability caused by strikes, which can lead to decreased morale and motivation.

.• Government Response: Over the years, the Nigerian government has made various attempts to negotiate with ASUU, including promises for increased funding and improved conditions.

However, these negotiations often lead to temporary resolutions rather than lasting solutions.

• Current Situation: The issue remains a significant challenge in Nigeria's education sector, with ASUU continuing to advocate for systemic reforms to address the root causes of the strikes.

THE JOURNEY TO RESET: A Vision for Today and Tomorrow

The journey to reset the standards of education in Nigeria is fraught with challenges. However, with collective effort, commitment, and the unwavering spirit of our alumni, we can overcome these obstacles. Let us unite in our mission to advocate for reforms, increase funding, uphold ethical standards, and embrace the future of education through research and technology.

Together, we can restore the pride and dignity of the University of Nigeria, ensuring that it remains a beacon of learning, research and knowledge for generations to come.

A CALL TO THE ALUMNI: Your Alma Mater Needs you Now:

You are who you are today, due partly to the University of Nigeria, but ultimately by the grace of God. And remember what the Bible tells us that the Lord, loves a cheerful giver. So it is not asking for too much for your university to make a clarion call to the alumni, to please come to Nsukka and save us.The university has a humongous number of alumni too numerous to mention. But please allow

just to mention a few.:

Many lions and lionesses at home and in the diaspora, too numerous to mention on this occasion.

In light of these several challenges facing the university, we call upon each one of you—alumni of the University, to come to the rescue of our Alma Mater. I’m aware that a few secondary schools and colleges, like Government College Umuahia, CIC Enugu and CKC Onitsha have restored and remodeled their Alma Mater

1. Establishment of a University Endowment Fund: Establishing a University of Nigeria Restoration Endowment Fund by the alumni of the University of Nigeria is paramount and long overdue and it involves several key steps and considerations to ensure its effectiveness and sustainability. Below is a structured outline of the setting up of such a fund:

Purpose and Objectives

- Define the Purpose: Clearly outline the goals of the endowment fund, such as supporting scholarships, faculty development, research initiatives, infrastructure improvements, or community engagement.

- Long-term Vision: Establish a vision for how the fund will benefit the university over the long term.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

- Incorporation: Form a legal entity to manage the endowment, which may be a nonprofit organization or a foundation.

- Compliance: Ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations governing charitable organizations in the jurisdiction.

Governance Structure

- Board of Trustees: Establish a board to oversee the fund, comprising alumni, faculty, and possibly other stakeholders. Define roles, responsibilities, and terms of service.

- Advisory Committees: Form committees to address specific areas such as investment strategy, scholarship selection, and fundraising. Funding Mechanism

- Initial Capital: Determine the initial capital required to launch the endowment fund. This may involve contributions from alumni, businesses, NGOs, and other donors.

- Ongoing Contributions: Set up mechanisms for continuous contributions, including annual giving campaigns, planned giving, and major gifts.

Investment Strategy

- Asset Allocation: Develop an investment strategy that balances risk and return to preserve the fund’s capital while generating income.

- Professional Management: Consider hiring professional investment managers or advisors to oversee the fund’s investments. Fund Management Policies

- Spending Policy: Establish a spending policy that dictates how much of the fund’s earnings can be used annually for scholarships or other purposes.

- Reporting and Transparency: Implement transparent reporting practices to keep stakeholders informed about the fund’s performance and expenditures.

Scholarship and Grant Criteria

- Eligibility Criteria: Define the criteria for scholarships or grants, including academic performance, financial need, and other relevant factors.

- Application Process: Create a fair and transparent application process for students seeking support from the fund.

Marketing and Communication

- Awareness Campaigns: Develop strategies to raise awareness of the endowment fund among alumni, current students, and the community.

- Engagement Initiatives: Foster engagement through newsletters, social media, and alumni events to encourage ongoing support and participation.

Monitoring and Evaluation

- Performance Metrics: Establish metrics to evaluate the fund’s impact and effectiveness in meeting its goals.- Regular Reviews: Conduct regular reviews of the fund’s performance and strategies to ensure

alignment with the university’s mission and objectives.

Celebration and Recognition

- Donor Recognition: Create a system to recognize and honor donors, which can encourage further contributions and strengthen alumni relationships.

- Impact Reporting: Share stories and outcomes of how the fund has positively impacted students and the university community.

Setting up an Endowment Fund by the alumni of the University of Nigeria requires careful planning, collaboration, transparency, and commitment. By following these structured steps, alumni can create a sustainable fund that supports the university's mission and enhances educational opportunities for future generations.

III. Igbo Entrepreneurial Apprentice Studies

Let the word go out from this place today the leadership of the University, gathered here today, to consider the establishment of a formal education program to be known and called the School of Igbo Entrepreneurial Apprentice Studies. Which in keeping with its name, will embark on the research and take a long term and in-depth study of the age- long Igbo Apprentice program, with a view to taking it to the next level and incorporating technology and global financial dynamics into consideration.

• Collegiate System (Decentralized University System) UNN is hereby advised to consider the unique Collegiate education system of Oxford and Cambridge and some American universities.

The Governing Council and the university administration, should commit a study to study the nuances and implications, advantages and disadvantages of this system.

• Executive Education: The University of Nigeria can introduce Executive programs by leveraging its existing academic resources and expertise to develop specialized, short-term courses aimed at working professionals. This can be achieved through partnerships with industry leaders to ensure curriculum relevance, utilizing online platforms for accessibility, and offering flexible scheduling to accommodate busy professionals.

• Advantages of Executive Programs for the University of Nigeria:
• Revenue Generation: These programs can create a new income stream, enhancing the university's financial stability.

• Industry Collaboration: Strengthening ties with businesses can lead to research opportunities and internships for students.

• Enhanced Reputation: Offering high-quality executive education can elevate the university's profile and attract more students.• Lifelong Learning: Fostering a culture of continuous education can position the university as a leader in professional development

• Networking Opportunities: These programs can facilitate connections between students and influential industry professionals, enriching the university community.

 University of Nigeria Farm Ltd: To establish farms that produce food for students, the campus community, Nsukka and Enugu state. The farm would focus on sustainable practices, education, and providing fresh produce. Universities like Cornell, Ithaca, which operates a student-run farm and agricultural research facilities that contribute produce to the university’s dining services while also serving as a teaching and research platform.

Appalachian State University also has a student-run farm, known as the Goodnight Family Sustainable Development Farm, which produces food for the campus community.

National University of Singapore has a campus garden that produces fruits, and vegetables, promoting urban farming and sustainability among students.

Although the University of Oxford does not have a traditional farm in the sense of a large agricultural operations that produces food for the students. It however has a project, Oxford UnFarm, which is associated with the department of Zoology and focuses on research and education in sustainable agriculture and food systems.

Eastern Nigeria Regional integration: the fear of ethnic dominance which existed in the 1960-1970s no longer exists. Theresa is an urgent need for the old eastern region to form and economic and security bloc, for there is strength in unity. We share common beliefs in education, hardwork, sanctity of human life and rights, our region has many things that bind us together, such as marriage, culture, religion, values and the pursuit of progress and happiness.

We also share common borders and wealth. Let us pull our little patches together are firm one quilt. Because when we struggle and complain in our different silos and patches, as Efik, Ibibio, Ijaw, Igbo, Calabari, Ogoni, Ndoni, Okrika, Ikom and Ogoja our individual patch is not enough.

Let us all come together, like Joseph’s mother, to sow together, a coat of many colors that will shield us from the cold of retrogression, and give us a collective warmth of peace, justice and progress.

• High Electricity bill payments to EEDC. UNN incurs millions of Naira in electricity expenses. The university should explore the possibilities of an alternative source and solution to its energy needs, such as renewable energy in solar and wind. Drawing again from the university anthem: “…Hail Varsity that is planted on soft green hills: Hail her and rejoice for her beauty sake. The hills of Nsukka and not just beautiful, but when subjected to research on its wind flow, could serve as a site for wind mills generating electricity.

Renewables and generating UNN electricity, to prevent heavy dependence rid electricity derived from the weight huge electricity bills

1. The Enugu State government should now commission a feasibility study and an impact assessment study of developing a Light rail transport system linking Enugu and Nsukka

2. Eastern Nigeria Development Corporation (ENDC), for economic, educational, and cultural cooperation., reminiscing national and regional blocs such as BRICS, ECOWAS.

Some analysts query why Nigeria is not a member of BRICS. But i wish to recommend the establishment of an Eastern Nigeria Development Corporation ( ENDC) an economic, security and infrastructure cooperation between the states of the defunct

Eastern Region.

Rehabilitating and remodeling university education at a university like the University of Nigeria could involve several key initiatives to enhance the overall learning experience for students.

Some potential strategies for the future of revamping university education at UNN could

include:

. Enhancing student support services: Providing comprehensive support services for students, including academic advising, counseling, and career guidance, can help students navigate their academic journey more effectively and succeed in their studies.

. Fostering interdisciplinary collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between different academic departments and promoting interdisciplinary research can help students develop a well-rounded education and gain a broader perspective on complex issues.

. Promoting experience learning opportunities: Offering hands-on learning experiences, such as internships, research projects, and community service initiatives, can help students apply their

knowledge in real-world settings and develop practical skills that are relevant to their future

careers.

. Enhancing faculty development: Providing professional development opportunities for faculty members to stay current with the latest pedagogical approaches and research trends can help ensure that students receive high-quality instruction and mentorship. Restoring university education at any university will require a comprehensive and collaborative effort from faculty, administrators, and students to create a dynamic and innovative learning environment that prepares students for success in the rapidly changing global economy.

Rebuilding the broken infrastructure, facilities, and addressing issues such as anti-social behavior of some lecturers, vices in the university system, and the erosion of ethical values in a university like the University of Nigeria Nsukka is crucial for revitalizing the institution and fostering a culture of academic excellence and innovation. Here are some key insights into the importance of addressing these challenges:

. Infrastructure and facilities: Investing in modern infrastructure and facilities is essential for creating a conducive learning environment that inspires creativity and innovation. Upgrading classrooms, laboratories, libraries, and other facilities can enhance the overall student experience and improve academic outcomes.

. Addressing anti-social behavior of some lecturers: Addressing issues of misconduct, unethical behavior, and abuse of power among faculty members is crucial for maintaining a positive and supportive learning environment. Implementing clear policies and procedures for reporting and addressing misconduct can help promote accountability and professionalism among staff.

Such as dedicated Whistleblowers telephone lines

. Tackling vices in the university system: Addressing vices such as corruption, nepotism, and academic dishonesty is essential for upholding the integrity of the academic institution.

Implementing transparent and fair evaluation processes, promoting ethical conduct, and fostering a culture of accountability can help deter vices and promote a culture of excellence.

. Rebuilding the value system, ethics, and ethos of the university: Restoring and reinforcing the core values of integrity, respect, excellence, and accountability is essential for fostering a culture of academic excellence and innovation. Promoting ethical conduct, diversity, and inclusivity can help create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that nurtures creativity and critical thinking.

. Fostering knowledge, research, innovation, and inventions: Cultivating a culture of knowledge creation, research excellence, innovation, and entrepreneurship is essential for positioning the university as a hub of academic excellence and a driver of economic development. Encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, supporting cutting-edge research initiatives, and fostering a spirit of creativity and innovation can help propel the institution to new heights of academic achievement. Addressing these challenges and rebuilding the infrastructure, facilities, and ethical values of a university like UNN is essential for revitalizing the institution, promoting a culture of academic excellence, and preparing students to thrive in a rapidly changing world. It will require a concerted effort from university leadership, faculty, students, and other stakeholders to create a vibrant and dynamic learning environment that fosters innovation, creativity, and positive social impact.

. Networking and collaboration: Alumni can facilitate networking opportunities and collaboration among students, faculty, industry partners, and other stakeholders, creating a vibrant ecosystem of knowledge sharing, innovation, and collaboration. By leveraging their connections and resources, alumni can help create opportunities for students to engage with real-world challenges and contribute to positive social change.

. Fundraising and philanthropy: Alumni can support the university through fundraising initiatives, donations, and philanthropic efforts to enhance infrastructure, facilities, scholarships, research programs, and other key initiatives. By giving back to their alma mater, alumni can help ensure that future generations of students have access to high-quality education and opportunities for personal and professional growth.

. Advocacy and public engagement: Alumni can serve as ambassadors for the university, advocating for its mission, values, and impact in the wider community. By promoting the university's achievements, values, and contributions to society, alumni can help raise awareness, build support, and attract resources to advance the institution's goals

The Advancement Board:

1. Reposition the Advancement Board:

- The Advancement Board plays a critical role in fundraising, alumni engagement, and strategic planning for the university. Repositioning the board can involve restructuring its composition, roles, and responsibilities to ensure effective leadership, governance, and oversight.

- The board can focus on expanding fundraising efforts, cultivating donor relationships, and securing financial support for key initiatives, such as infrastructure development, research programs, scholarships, and faculty development.

- By enhancing the board's capacity and effectiveness, the university can strengthen its resource mobilization efforts, promote sustainability, and advance its mission of academic excellence and social impact.2. Creating Centers of Excellence in Research in Medicine and Health Sciences:

- Establishing centers of excellence in research in medicine and health sciences can position UNN as a leader in cutting-edge research, innovation, and knowledge creation in these critical fields.

- These centers can facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, attract top talent, secure research funding, and drive impactful research projects that address pressing health challenges and contribute to scientific advancement.

- By fostering a culture of research excellence and innovation, the university can enhance its reputation, attract top students and faculty, and make meaningful contributions to healthcare delivery, public health, and societal well-being.

3. Providing Consulting Services to Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance Companies (BFS&I)

- Offering consulting services to banking, financial services, and insurance companies can leverage the university's expertise, knowledge, and resources to address industry challenges, provide strategic insights, and drive organizational performance.

- The University can establish partnerships and collaborations with industry stakeholders to offer specialized consulting services, training programs, and research projects that address emerging trends, regulatory requirements, and market dynamics.

- By engaging with the private sector, the university can enhance its relevance, build industry connections, and create opportunities for knowledge exchange, skill development, and mutual benefit.

Reestablishing the Advancement Board, creating centers of excellence in research in medicine and health sciences, and providing consulting services to industry MMC sectors can enhance the University of Nigeria Nsukka's impact, visibility, and reputation, while advancing its mission of academic excellence, innovation, and societal relevance. These initiatives can strengthen the university's capacity to address complex challenges, drive positive change, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge, research, and practice in key sectors of importance.

Embracing the Future: Research and AI Readiness

As we reflect on our university’s potential, we must also ask: Are our public universities equipped to carry out meaningful research and development in line with today’s global realities? The answer lies in our commitment to innovation and collaboration. We must foster partnerships with industries and governmental agencies to create a research ecosystem that addresses real-world challenges.Furthermore, as we stand on the precipice of a technological revolution, we must ask ourselves:

How AI-ready are our universities? The future of education and industry will undoubtedly be shaped by artificial intelligence. It is imperative that we incorporate AI into our curricula, train our faculty, and equip our students with the skills needed to thrive in this new era. Embracing the disruptive technologies will not only enhance our educational frameworks but also prepare our graduates for the complexities of the modern workforce. Now, let me sound a note of warning to both our students and faculties: “AI will not take your job. But the person who has learned to use AI will”.

The Landscape of Technology Disruption: Generative Artificial Intelligence Preparing current students at the University of Nigeria to navigate the landscape of technological disruption caused by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics is crucial for equipping them with the skills and knowledge needed to thrive in the digital age. Here are some potential plans and strategies that the university could consider in tweaking its curriculum to address the challenges and opportunities presented by AI and robotics:

• Integration of AI and Robotics Courses: The university can introduce specialized courses on AI, machine learning, robotics, and other related technologies to provide students with a foundational understanding of these concepts. These courses can cover topics such as data science, programming languages, AI algorithms, and ethical considerations in AI development.

• How would Universities deal with the use of Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT by students, teaching and research staff?. Will the use of Chatbot be viewed as academic dishonesty, and plagiarism?

• Interdisciplinary Approach: UNN can encourage interdisciplinary collaboration among different academic departments to foster a holistic understanding of AI and robotics. By incorporating perspectives from fields such as computer science, engineering, social sciences, and ethics, students can gain a broader appreciation of the implications and applications of AI technologies.

• Hands-on Learning Opportunities: Providing students with hands-on learning experiences, such as project-based assignments, research projects, and internships in AI-related industries, can help them apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios and develop practical skills in AI development and implementation.• Industry Partnerships and Guest Lectures: Collaborating with industry partners, AI experts, and professionals in the field of robotics can provide students with insights into industry trends, best practices, and career opportunities in the AI sector. Guest lectures, workshops, and industry visits can expose students to real-world applications of AI and robotics technologies.

• Emphasis on Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: The university can emphasize critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity in its curriculum to equip students with the skills needed to adapt to the evolving technological landscape. Encouraging students to think innovatively, experiment with new ideas, and collaborate on interdisciplinary projects can cultivate a mindset of lifelong learning and adaptability.

• Ethical and Social Implications: Incorporating discussions on the ethical, legal, and social implications of AI and robotics technologies can help students develop a well-rounded understanding of the broader impact of these technologies on society.

Addressing issues such as bias, privacy, accountability, and job displacement can foster a culture of responsible innovation and ethical decision-making.

By implementing these strategies and tweaking its curriculum to reflect the emerging trends in AI and robotics, the University of Nigeria can better prepare its current students to thrive in a rapidly changing technological landscape. By equipping students with the skills, knowledge, and mindset needed to harness the potential of AI and robotics technologies, UNN can empower its graduates to lead and contribute meaningfully to the digital transformation of society.

OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS

• Learn from the GCU experience
• BAFA donation of Books
• Rhodes Scholarship for Masters and Doctorate degrees Selection Committee (Age 18-24)

• African Leadership Institute (AFLI) Archbishop Desmond Tutu Fellowship (Age 30-40)
• Senior Academic Fellowship of UNN faculties with Foreign Universities WORDS OF PURPOSE FROM GARTNER RESEARCH: BY GARTNER

“The future doesn’t invent itself. It is created by today’s leaders, who know that the pace of change will never be this slow again. We must work together as leaders every day, to pursue our mission-critical priorities seize opportunities from disruption Cast a vision for the future and build it step by step

We must equip them with indispensable insights, advise and tools to confidently tackle today’s challenges and pursue tomorrow’s possibilities. Together we fuel the future of business. And a more successful world takes shape”.