Balthazar Ebang Engonga, the nephew of Equatorial Guinea’s long-serving President Teodoro Obiang, has been acquitted by the country’s Supreme Court after facing a high-profile case involving intimate videos that made waves, both locally and internationally. The court’s ruling, which dismissed all charges against Mr. Engonga, was grounded on the lack of evidence to support the allegations, as well as the assertion that all parties involved in the videos were consenting adults.

This case first attracted attention after compromising footage of Mr. Engonga surfaced online, sparking a media frenzy. The court’s ruling brought clarity to the situation, stating that medical tests confirmed there was no transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, further cementing Engonga’s claim of innocence. However, beyond the acquittal, the case has brought to light broader issues surrounding privacy, consent, accountability, and the implications of the digital era on personal and professional lives.

The release of intimate videos of public figures is a frequent topic of discussion in today’s digital world, where personal lives are often exposed without permission. The leak of videos involving Mr. Engonga was no different, attracting significant media coverage and public attention. The nature of the videos was compromising, and the shockwaves reverberated far beyond Equatorial Guinea, drawing international scrutiny. As the videos spread on various platforms, they became a spectacle, fueling gossip and speculation about the private lives of the individuals involved.

Despite the sensationalism of the situation, Mr. Engonga has maintained that the individuals shown in the videos were consenting adults. The Supreme Court, in its judgment, supported this assertion, and the ruling emphasized the lack of any evidence to suggest non-consensual behavior. Medical tests were also conducted, which proved that there were no sexually transmitted diseases involved in the case, further supporting Mr. Engonga’s defense.

However, the public’s reaction to the videos did not stop at the question of consent. In an unexpected twist, several married men whose wives appeared in the footage expressed gratitude to Mr. Engonga. These men explained that the videos had revealed hidden aspects of their marital lives, prompting some to seek divorce. This development is a stark reflection of the complexities of modern relationships and the role that privacy, trust, and transparency play in marriage.

For many, the case became more than just a scandal involving a public figure, it became a symbol of the digital age’s power to expose even the most intimate corners of our lives. The internet, which has the potential to connect and inform, can also serve as a tool for destruction, often without regard for the emotional consequences.

In response to the leak, Mr. Engonga has vowed to take legal action against those responsible for disseminating the videos. He described the leak as a serious violation of his privacy, one that has caused significant emotional distress to his family. His wife, in particular, was deeply affected by the ordeal, as were many of the other people featured in the footage. The emotional toll that such an invasion of privacy takes on individuals is often underestimated. In Mr. Engonga’s case, it not only impacted his personal life but also his professional reputation and the public’s perception of him.

The issue of privacy in the digital age is complex, as the boundaries between public and private life are increasingly blurred. While public figures often have their personal lives scrutinized, the leak of private content without consent raises ethical questions. Who owns the right to one’s personal data, and what happens when that data is shared without permission? The actions of those who leaked the videos, and the subsequent viral spread of the footage, pose critical questions about accountability and the ethics of digital content sharing.

In many ways, this case highlights the difficulty of navigating the online space, where personal information is often treated as currency and privacy is viewed as a luxury. As social media platforms and online spaces become more pervasive, the consequences of sharing intimate content without consent are far-reaching. The damage done to individuals’ lives is not just legal but deeply personal, affecting their families, relationships, and mental well-being.

Before the scandal, Mr. Engonga was known for his role as the head of the National Financial Investigation Agency (ANIF) in Equatorial Guinea. In this capacity, he worked to combat financial crimes such as money laundering and illicit financial flows. He was seen as a key figure in the fight against corruption, particularly in a country where transparency and accountability in government finances have long been concerns.

However, after his arrest on October 25, 2024, allegations surfaced that he had embezzled substantial amounts of state funds, hiding them in offshore accounts. These allegations added an additional layer of complexity to an already controversial case. Despite being publicly accused of financial crimes, Mr. Engonga has not yet addressed these charges in public, leaving much to be speculated about the true nature of the case. His arrest brought him into the crosshairs of both his critics and supporters, leading to questions about his professional conduct and the personal scandal that followed.

The combination of his work in law enforcement and his personal indiscretions has raised eyebrows, particularly given the increasing attention on corruption within the government. His arrest and the subsequent revelations about his private life have cast a shadow on his professional reputation, forcing people to question the integrity of individuals in positions of power.

After his arrest, Mr. Engonga was imprisoned in Malabo’s infamous Black Beach prison, a facility notorious for its harsh conditions and its treatment of political opponents. Black Beach prison has long been associated with human rights abuses, with numerous reports documenting the mistreatment of detainees, particularly those viewed as enemies of the government. The prison has become a symbol of the oppressive nature of the country’s justice system, which has drawn international condemnation over the years.

For Mr. Engonga, his imprisonment in Malabo’s infamous Black Beach prison was a traumatic experience that only added to the already complicated nature of his case. The brutal conditions of the prison have been documented in multiple reports, with former detainees recounting instances of physical abuse, torture, and inadequate medical care. The prison has become a focal point in discussions about the government’s treatment of those it deems a threat, further fueling skepticism about the fairness of the country’s legal system.

One of the most striking aspects of this case is how technology, particularly the internet and social media, has played a central role in the unfolding drama. The leak of the intimate videos and their subsequent virality on social platforms demonstrated the immense power that digital content holds. While technology has made information more accessible and communication more instantaneous, it has also raised ethical questions about the sharing of private content without consent.

The ease with which personal videos and photos can be shared in the digital era has led to an explosion of online content, much of which is not intended for public consumption. The unintended consequences of this are vast, and they often include emotional distress, reputational damage, and legal ramifications for those involved. The sharing of intimate content, whether for revenge, profit, or entertainment, has become an all-too-common occurrence, and the impact it has on the lives of those affected cannot be underestimated.

As a society, we must reckon with the ethics of digital content sharing and its consequences. While freedom of speech and access to information are fundamental rights, they should not come at the expense of an individual’s right to privacy and dignity. The case of Balthazar Ebang Engonga serves as a stark reminder of how quickly personal information can be weaponized, and how the digital world can invade our private spaces in ways that are both harmful and irreversible.

This case highlights several critical issues surrounding consent, privacy, and accountability in the digital age. It also underscores the need for stronger legal frameworks to protect individuals in an era where the boundaries between the private and public spheres are increasingly difficult to define. In particular, it calls attention to the dangers of sharing intimate content online and the emotional toll that such invasions of privacy can have on those involved.

The actions of those responsible for leaking the videos, coupled with the wider public reaction, show how digital media can reshape our understanding of consent and accountability. As the world becomes more connected through the internet, it is essential that we address the ethical and legal implications of digital content sharing. The case of Mr. Engonga is a poignant reminder of the power of technology in modern society, and the importance of respecting privacy in an increasingly transparent world.

This incident may have concluded with an acquittal, but the broader questions it raises about consent, privacy, and accountability in the digital age are far from settled. As we continue to navigate the complexities of the online world, it is vital that we remain vigilant in safeguarding the rights and dignity of individuals, both in their personal and professional lives.

When news broke that the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) had published a list of 9,532 alleged land title defaulters, including heavyweights like former Nigerian Head of State Ibrahim Babangida (IBB), it did not take long for discussions to circle around the interplay of power, influence, and the game of land politics in Nigeria. The inclusion of IBB, one of Nigeria’s most astute political figures, in a list of debtors owing ₦152 million for a plot in Asokoro, sent shockwaves through the political corridors of Abuja, raising one intriguing question: “Shey Wike think say e go fit dribble Maradona?”

This line of inquiry, coming from a colleague in the office, plays on a larger political conversation, whether Barrister Nyesom Wike, former Governor of Rivers State, and currently the minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), known for his political sharpness, could truly outmaneuver IBB, who, in his heyday, earned the moniker “Maradona” for his political sagacity. IBB’s deft maneuvers on the political field were legendary, and as the news of his alleged debt circulated, it was easy to see how the dynamics of power and influence in Nigeria’s political landscape could be at play in this seemingly mundane land dispute.

Ibrahim Babangida, Nigeria’s military ruler from 1985 to 1993, is no stranger to political intrigue. His tenure, marked by both controversy and skillful maneuvering, set the stage for him to be a political kingmaker long after his time in office. Known for his ability to play rival factions against each other, IBB’s name has remained synonymous with political power broking in Nigeria. It is not an overstatement to suggest that IBB’s influence still looms large, especially in the corridors of power where alliances and rivalries are constantly shifting.

So, when the FCTA named IBB among the defaulters for a ₦152 million debt on land in Asokoro, the first thought might be: Is this an attempt to bring down a figure as influential as Maradona? The FCTA’s move to expose such a prominent figure is unusual, considering the history of political protection and patronage that surrounds Nigeria’s elite. Land, particularly in Abuja, is not just a matter of real estate; it is a symbol of power, status, and influence.

What makes this more interesting is the timing. Governor Wike, a man known for his combative political style and ability to challenge the status quo, has been rising in political prominence. His recent activities, especially his push for reforms and changes in political alignments, seem to coincide with this new wave of land titling scrutiny. Could this be a subtle way for Wike to assert his dominance over Nigeria’s power structures? Could he be trying to check Maradona’s seemingly untouchable status, leveraging this land debt to his advantage?

Governor Nyesom Wike is a seasoned political player, particularly in the volatile world of Nigerian state politics. His reputation for being direct, tough, and unyielding in his approach has earned him both admirers and enemies. Wike’s penchant for challenging entrenched political interests has made him a figure to watch, especially as he moves into the national political stage with an eye on greater influence.

The ongoing tussle between Wike and some political elites has been brewing for some time. Wike’s influence is undeniable, particularly in the Niger Delta region, but his recent moves show a man eager to expand his national reach. His confrontations with federal government policies, his vocal support for opposition parties, and his strategic positioning in the aftermath of the 2023 elections all point to his desire to reshape the political order. In that light, the question of whether Wike could “dribble” IBB, who is, after all, the man who has maneuvered around Nigeria’s political landscape for decades, is both timely and intriguing.

Wike’s confrontational style may suggest that he is testing the waters with his political rivals. The publication of IBB’s alleged land debt could be part of a larger strategy of political positioning, one where Wike seeks to challenge the perceived invincibility of the old guard. By targeting landholders like IBB, Wike might be sending a subtle message that no one is above scrutiny, not even Nigeria’s most seasoned political players.

Land in Nigeria is more than just property, it is a symbol of wealth, power, and influence. The recent naming of top political figures as defaulters by the FCTA signals that land title disputes, especially in the capital, are closely tied to the intricate webs of Nigerian politics. As Abuja has grown into the heart of Nigeria’s political and administrative activities, land ownership in the city has become a marker of one’s proximity to power. A plot of land in Asokoro, for example, is not just real estate; it is literarily a seat at the table of political elites.

For IBB, who once held absolute power in Nigeria, land ownership in Abuja is a status symbol, something that reflects both his past political dominance and ongoing influence. However, the fact that his name appeared on the list of defaulters raises questions. Could it be that there is a larger political maneuver behind it? Perhaps the timing is not coincidental; perhaps it is an attempt to chip away at his legacy and influence.

The question that lingers is whether Wike, with his recent political endeavors, can truly outplay IBB in this game of political chess. IBB’s reputation as a master of realpolitik suggests that any move against him is unlikely to go unnoticed. Maradona’s ability to navigate Nigeria’s complex political terrain is well-documented; his alliances and machinations are often subtle, yet highly effective.

If  Wike indeed sees this as an opportunity to undermine IBB’s influence, it would not be the first time he has taken on formidable political figures. Wike has consistently demonstrated an ability to rally public opinion and apply pressure in ways that force even the most established players to reconsider their strategies. However, challenging IBB is no small feat. The former Head of State is known for his networks, his ability to play the long game, and his capacity to keep his political cards close to his chest.

The fact that prominent figures like IBB are part of the FCTA’s land defaulter list suggests that no one is immune from scrutiny, no matter how powerful. But whether this move will diminish IBB’s stature or simply fuel his political survival instincts remains to be seen.

The unfolding land title dispute in the Federal Capital Territory is more than just a case of defaulters and overdue payments. It is a reflection of the larger struggle for power in Nigerian politics. Wike, known for his combative and strategic nature, may very well be attempting to make a move against one of Nigeria’s most skilled powerbrokers. However, IBB’s decades of political experience, combined with his vast network, suggest that he will not go down without a fight.

As the FCTA’s ultimatum looms, the game of political maneuvering continues, and the outcome remains uncertain. One thing is clear: in Nigerian politics, nothing is as it seems, and every move is part of a larger chess game where only the most astute players can survive. Will Wike be able to outmaneuver Maradona? Time will tell. But in Nigerian politics, as in the world of football, anything is possible.

Journalism holds a powerful position in society. It informs, educates, and serves as a vital check on power. Yet, despite its role as a cornerstone of democracy, journalism is not without its ethical dilemmas, especially for those who seek to balance their faith with their professional responsibilities. At the heart of this conflict lies the tension between two distinct approaches to journalism: developmental journalism and adversarial journalism. Each has its own set of challenges, and each places journalists at a crossroads, forcing them to choose between truth and duty.

For Christians, the call to truth is non-negotiable. Scripture teaches that truth is central to faith and practice (Exodus 20:16), a principle that all Christians strive to uphold. But for journalists, truth becomes entangled in a web of professional pressures, editorial choices, and expectations from both the public and government. While journalists are tasked with reporting the truth, the realities of the profession, just like that of lawyers, often compel them to compromise, creating a tension that many find difficult to navigate.

Developmental journalism, a model that seeks to highlight national achievements and foster growth, demands a specific narrative. Practitioners of developmental journalism are often asked to paint a rosier picture than reality might suggest, sometimes even portraying the nation’s economy as thriving despite evidence to the contrary. In a country grappling with economic challenges, for instance, journalists who adopt this model might be expected to emphasize growth and stability, even when the facts tell a different story.

This expectation is not limited to journalists alone. Just as Davido, a popular Nigerian singer, has recently been labeled for his comments during an interview in America, the pressure to present a certain narrative can transcend professions. During his interview, Davido was seemingly accused of not portraying Nigeria to be in state of Eldorado. Some critics suggested that his global platform should have been used to speak more glowingly about the state of the nation. Similarly, journalists following the developmental model are sometimes expected to echo a version of national success, even when such a narrative risks obscuring pressing social and economic issues. The case of Davido highlights a broader tendency to demand loyalty to a polished, often idealized portrayal of national progress, at the cost of confronting uncomfortable truths.

But this model comes with ethical implications. For journalists of faith, presenting misleading or partial truths raises difficult moral questions. Can one genuinely say the economy is thriving when so many are struggling? Can a journalist faithfully report on the benefits of government policies when the public is not experiencing those benefits?

In this context, journalists are often caught in a dilemma: do they fulfill their duty to support national development, or do they uphold their ethical commitment to truth? When speaking the truth might harm national pride or image, the answer is not always clear.

On the other hand, there are adversarial journalists, those who view their role as standing apart from the powers that be and holding them to account. These journalists are willing to expose the truth, even when it risks damaging the reputation of government officials, powerful corporations, or society as a whole. Their job is to uncover corruption, report on injustice, and speak out when the system fails.

From an ethical standpoint, adversarial journalism aligns more closely with Christian principles. The Bible calls for justice and righteousness (Isaiah 1:17), and many adversarial journalists see their work as fulfilling this divine mandate. They understand that sometimes, exposing uncomfortable truths is necessary for the greater good. By reporting on societal wrongs, they hope to provoke change and bring about accountability.

However, the path of the adversarial journalist is fraught with danger. Adversarial journalism can cost a reporter his or her career, freedom, or even his or her life. In authoritarian regimes or politically charged environments, journalists who refuse to tow the official line often face retaliation. In less extreme cases, journalists working for media outlets owned by the government, or sympathetic to it, may find their careers stifled or their jobs at risk.

For those in government-controlled media, taking an adversarial stance can be akin to professional suicide. The pressure to conform to the government’s narrative can be overwhelming, and any journalist who dares to speak out may find himself or herself marginalized or fired. In this environment, speaking the truth becomes a dangerous game, where the stakes are higher than simply reporting facts.

The dilemma faced by journalists is not unique to the media industry. In many professions, individuals are often forced to balance personal values with professional requirements. But in journalism, this conflict is particularly acute. Journalists must decide whether to prioritize their professional duty to inform the public or adhere to the ethical principles of honesty and integrity. For instance, what kind of reportage is expected from a journalist who has been promised an advertisement space?

The cost of this compromise can be steep. Journalists who choose developmental journalism over adversarial reporting may find themselves compromised by a system that encourages the distortion of facts for the sake of national unity or pecuniary gain. Those who opt for the adversarial path may risk their careers, reputation, or even personal safety.

For Christian journalists, the decision is even more profound. Their faith calls them to truthfulness and integrity in all aspects of life. But the very nature of journalism often forces them to choose between doing what is right and doing what is professionally expedient.

The dilemma is not just about ethics but about survival. Can one remain faithful to Christian principles in a profession that sometimes rewards deceit or silence? Can a journalist navigate the tension between personal integrity and professional duty without losing his or her soul?

Be that as it may, the expediency of striking a balance between faith and professionalism is not negotiable.

In fact, the key to navigating this dilemma lies in balance. Journalists can, and should, adhere to ethical guidelines that prioritize truthfulness, fairness, and transparency. The practice of journalism must always be rooted in integrity, even if it means going against the grain. But journalists also need to be strategic in their approach, especially when dealing with powerful interests.

Adversarial journalism, while important, should be practiced with care. While it is crucial to hold power to account, it is also important to provide context, avoid sensationalism, and seek constructive solutions. Likewise, developmental journalism can be a powerful tool for promoting national growth, or protecting the interest of an organization where a media house has a pecuniary interest, but it must not be used as an excuse to ignore systemic issues or suppress critical voices.

For Christian journalists, the answer is clear: Truth must always be the foundation of their work. However, they must also be mindful of the consequences of their reporting and the ethical dilemmas that arise. Journalism, like any other profession, particularly the law profession, is not without its compromises. But by adhering to a strong moral framework and seeking guidance from their faith, journalists can navigate the difficult terrain between truth and duty.

Journalism, in all its forms, demands that its practitioners confront ethical crossroads on a daily basis. The choice between developmental journalism and adversarial journalism represents a profound moral dilemma for those who seek to stay true to their profession while adhering to their faith. But the ethical challenge goes deeper than the question of which path to follow; it is about finding the courage to remain truthful, even when the consequences are steep.

For Christian journalists, the question is not just about what they report, but how they report it. Can they be faithful to their calling as truth-tellers, even when the truth is uncomfortable? Can they navigate the treacherous waters of professional compromise without sacrificing their integrity? In the end, the answer lies in their commitment to the principles of truth, justice, and righteousness, a commitment that must guide every decision they make, both as journalists and as people of faith.

President Bola Tinubu’s visit to France reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to deepening bilateral ties and attracting investment in critical economic sectors.

This high-profile visit comes as 2024 half-year foreign trade data highlights France as Nigeria’s sixth-largest trading partner, with total trade volumes at N4.4 trillion.

Notably, exports to France stood at N3.4 trillion, making it Nigeria’s largest single-country export destination and second only to Africa as a region.

In a high-profile meeting at the historic Palais des L’Elysée, President Tinubu and his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, explored avenues to strengthen their economic and diplomatic ties.

Tinubu outlined an ambitious agenda focusing on key areas of collaboration, aimed at unlocking Nigeria’s untapped potential and fostering mutual prosperity.

Nairametrics research highlights the ten key areas of economic partnership President Tinubu sought to strengthen during his visit to France, aimed at fostering mutual growth and unlocking Nigeria’s vast economic potential.

1. Agricultural Development and Food Security

President Tinubu called for French investment to bolster Nigeria’s agricultural productivity, emphasizing food security as a top priority. He noted:

“The French-Nigeria Business Forum is doing a lot already, but we need to do more on food security. We cannot help but invest in another’s country. It is our responsibility to put together a food security program for the private sector to come and invest in the country.”

Tinubu highlighted Nigeria’s flourishing financial sector as a catalyst for foreign investments in agriculture. He assured:

“Nigeria’s financial sector is evolving and flourishing. We are also creating grounds for investment in Nigeria’s economy for French nationals, especially in the area of food security.”

Nigeria’s financial services sector recorded a GDP growth rate of 30.83% in the third quarter of 2024 boosting overall GDP growth rate to 3.46%

2. Solid Minerals Exploration

The President invited French investors to explore opportunities in Nigeria’s underdeveloped solid minerals sector. He emphasized de-risking the sector for easier investment:

“We should de-risk the opportunities in the solid minerals. We have the potentials and we have agreed on a deeper and deeper relationship.”

An agreement was signed during the visit, signaling increased French commitment to the sector.

Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria’s mining sector is set to become a key driver of economic diversification and growth.

• The administration aims to modernize the Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act to attract global investors, ensure environmental sustainability, and improve community welfare.
• Key initiatives include developing infrastructure to support mining operations, combating illegal mining through a dedicated Mining Marshal Corps, and fostering human capital development through training and research programs.
• To boost foreign investment, incentives like tax waivers and security reforms have been introduced, alongside efforts to mandate local mineral processing and revoke dormant licenses.

3. Youth Development and Training

Tinubu stressed the importance of equipping Nigeria’s youthful population with skills through French-backed training initiatives. He stated:

“I can assure you that Nigeria is open for business. We have a vibrant youth population that is educated and ready to be trained in various areas of entrepreneurship and development.”

Tinubu requested specific programs aimed at building the entrepreneurial capacities of Nigerian youths.

4. Energy Transition

The President urged French companies to collaborate with Nigeria in its drive toward cleaner energy solutions while maximizing existing resources.

• While not directly quoted in this sector, Tinubu’s broader remarks about foreign investments in critical areas aligned with Nigeria’s energy priorities.
• Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria’s energy transition plan aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060 while ensuring economic growth and energy access.
• The strategy focuses on decarbonizing key sectors: power, cooking, oil and gas, transport, and industry.
• Initiatives include increasing renewable energy contributions, promoting clean cooking technologies, and adopting natural gas as a transitional fuel.

The government is also investing in infrastructure, such as compressed natural gas (CNG) stations, to provide affordable alternatives to petrol and reduce transportation costs. International partnerships, like the agreement with Germany on wind energy development, support these efforts.

5. Blue Economy and Fisheries

Tinubu highlighted the opportunities in Nigeria’s untapped blue economy, particularly in fisheries, citing Lagos as an example of effective resource management:

“In Lagos, we have tamed the Atlantic Ocean. For us, fishery is an important aspect of investment.”

He encouraged French investors to explore these prospects, assuring:

“We want to assure the French investment community that Nigeria is open for business. It shall be easy in, and easy out.”

Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria is prioritizing the development of its blue economy to stimulate economic growth and sustainability.

• The administration is focusing on enhancing maritime security through initiatives like the Deep Blue Project, which has significantly reduced piracy in Nigerian waters and the Gulf of Guinea.
• Collaborations with regional partners aim to address maritime insecurity comprehensively.

6. Security Cooperation

Acknowledging global security challenges, Tinubu called for collaborative measures to combat terrorism and reduce migration pressures. He stated:

“Nigeria is a partner in progress. We are ready to partner with France so that we can have security operations that will stop the challenge of migration.”

7. Education and Child Welfare

Tinubu emphasized the importance of child education and welfare as a cornerstone for national development. He noted:

“A starved nation will not care about weather or environment, and in the 21st century, no child should go to bed hungry.”

Proposing solutions, he said:

“If an African child is given a glass of milk in a class, there will be no problem in getting him to return and stay in school to learn. The more educated the children are, the better it is for us.”

8. Defense and Technology

In discussions on defense, Tinubu sought advanced technology solutions to address security threats and enhance Nigeria’s defense capabilities. He emphasized the shared responsibility of governments to ensure regional stability.

9. Support for Creative Industries

President Macron praised Nigeria’s creative industries as a growth engine and pledged France’s support. Tinubu encouraged deeper collaboration in promoting Nigerian art, music, and film globally, as part of broader youth-focused initiatives.

10. Trade and Investment Ease

Tinubu reaffirmed Nigeria’s openness to business and reassured potential French investors of a friendly operating environment:

“We are working on stability and we are getting closer and closer, but we can do better and better.”

He emphasized ongoing reforms to simplify trade and encourage foreign direct investment, stating:

“I can assure you that Nigeria is open for business.”

Macron’s Commitment to Strengthened Ties

President Emmanuel Macron described Tinubu’s visit as a landmark in bilateral relations, applauding his leadership and vision:

“You are the great leader of the great country in Africa. We appreciate your visionary leadership and energy in transforming the economy of your country.”

Macron pledged to expand cooperation, especially in solid minerals and youth development, emphasizing that global challenges require collaborative solutions:

“We have confidence that you, Mr. President, will reinforce our relationship with Nigeria, and it will cover the West Coast region, with ECOWAS playing the leading role.”

 [Nairametrics]

The operational capacity of the recently rehabilitated Port Harcourt Refining Company faced significant scrutiny on Thursday.

Allegations surfaced that petroleum products loaded from the facility on Tuesday were not newly refined but were, instead, products stored in its tanks for over three years. 

This situation has reignited skepticism surrounding the refinery, which has experienced repeated delays and missed deadlines, with seven failed attempts to resume operations.

Timothy Mgbere, Secretary of the Alesa community stakeholders, claimed during a Thursday interview that the refinery’s 60,000 barrels per day capacity is far from being fully operational, contradicting the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s (NNPCL) assertions.

The Alesa community, located in Eleme, Rivers State, hosts the Port Harcourt refinery.

Mgbere alleged that only six trucks of petroleum products were loaded on Tuesday, despite NNPCL’s claim that 200 trucks would be dispatched daily.

He further highlighted that the ceremony marking the plant’s reopening was largely symbolic, stating that full operations had not commenced.

Industry experts have called on NNPCL to substantiate its claims by selling products directly to oil marketers. However, NNPCL spokesperson Femi Soneye declined to respond to inquiries on the matter.

The refinery resumed operations on Tuesday after years of inactivity. NNPCL stated that the revamped complex of the old refinery operates at 70% of its installed capacity, producing diesel, Pour Fuel Oil, and other petroleum products. According to NNPCL, the facility is expected to release 200 trucks of petrol daily into the Nigerian market.

However, Mgbere described the reopening event as a superficial showcase, adding that not all units of the old complex are functional. He insisted that what was presented to the public does not reflect the reality on the ground.

Mgbere further criticized the refinery’s automation claims, stating that inefficiencies remain evident.

He also accused the contractor of incompetence, pointing out that the project was heavily reliant on subcontractors, many of whom lacked the required equipment.

He said, “The Port Harcourt refinery, and by extension, the Port Harcourt depot, happens to be the mainstay of the Alesa community economy. The economic activities emanating from the operations of these depots mean a lot to us as a community people, but as it were, now, I don’t think it’s a cause for celebration yet because what we are having in the media space is different from what we have on the ground.

“I can tell you on authority as a community person, that what happened on Tuesday was just a mere show at the Port Harcourt depot. A mere show in the sense that the Port Harcourt refinery, we call it area five, that is the old refinery, is merely in skeletal operation. When I say skeletal, I mean that some units of the refinery were brought up and are running, but not the entire unit of the old refinery is functional, as we speak.

“I will give them the credit that at least they have started something, but not to say, according to the Head of Corporate Communication, Femi Soneye, like it is in the media that they are already producing 1.4m barrels per day. That’s not the case. That’s not true. I don’t want to use the word lie, but as an agency that is holding the oil industry in trust for Nigerians, they shouldn’t put out information that is not true.”

He argued that “the true picture of what happened on Tuesday is that the NNPC has been under pressure to televise to Nigerians that everything is okay and that the old refinery has started functioning.

“I can tell you that the MD or the CEO of the refinery, was in Port Harcourt since Monday; the other MDs were also in Port Harcourt. The MD of Port Harcourt refinery and those heading the operations department didn’t sleep through the night of Monday to Tuesday because of the whole event they had on Tuesday.

“What is the true picture? The Old Port Harcourt refinery is built with its utilities, different from the new complex. The tank farm that is servicing the Old Port Harcourt refinery has a different loading gantry at the depot.”

Continuing, he said, “The party they had on Tuesday was held at the new loading gantry that is directly connected to the new refinery. And so, how does that work? It is impossible. The feedstock storage facility for the old refinery had some stock, old stock that has been there for over three years.

“And so what they did was to release that stock, and then loaded six trucks and then televised it to Nigerians that it is the production from the old refinery. That’s not true. And so I like Nigerians to know the truth, but they don’t need to believe me, because Nigerians, no matter how you paint the true pictures to them, they get sentimental. They get tribalistic. They want to whip some sentiment and all that the product that was loaded. But let it be on record that it was only six trucks that they used to calibrate the new loading gantry. The product was not a new refined product from the old refinery.”

Energy experts echoed Mgbere’s concerns, urging NNPCL to disclose the source of its feedstock and the state of its distillation points.

Bala Zaka, an energy consultant, questioned why products were being stored rather than immediately released to the market, arguing that such practices increase costs unnecessarily.

He said in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, “Generally, when a company produces a product regardless of the type or time, whether it is biscuit or toilet rolls. The first thing you do immediately when products come out of production is to send them to the market. You send them out to customers.

Popular gospel musician, Osinachi Kalu, known professionally as Sinach has been dragged to the court by music producer, Michael Oluwole over alleged copyright infringement.

Oluwole, better known as Maye, sued Sinach for N5 billion over ‘Way Maker’, her 2016 hit song.

In the suit numbered FHC/L/CS/402/2024, Maye is seeking a declaration that he is an author and co-owner of the song, demanding general damages of N5 billion for cumulative infringement of his rights.

While denying the producer’s claims, Sinach, who claimed the sole authorship of the song, noted that she has achieved global recognition before ‘Way Maker’ song.

The trial, which began at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday November 27, 2024, was adjourned until January 29 and 30, 2025.

[Leadership]

In the world of fencing, 16-year-old Inkosi Brou’s dream of becoming a professional athlete is gradually becoming a reality, as evident in previous performances in a sport he first encountered through a profound moment of inspiration and childhood imagination. 

Though his name might be new to many, his story is a reflection of passion, perseverance, and the dedicated journey of a young fencer whose dreams are as sharp as his blade.

Growing up in the USA with Nigerian roots, Inkosi’s love for swords began long before he even knew what fencing was.

As a young child, he could often be found in his backyard or living room, wielding makeshift swords fashioned from cardboard, plastic, and whatever materials he could scavenge. These homemade creations were his playthings, his companions in countless imaginary battles, and his earliest introduction to the art of swordsmanship.

It was not until he was eight years old that Inkosi’s playful fascination with swords found its true calling. The catalyst for this transformation was none other than Ibtihaj Muhammad, a trailblazing fencer who represented the USA in the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro. 

Watching Muhammad’s grace and skill on the international stage was a turning point for Inkosi. The young boy was captivated by the sport, its elegance, and the strategic precision it required. His admiration quickly turned into determination; he begged his mother to find a local fencing studio.

The search led to a studio where Inkosi borrowed his first saber and mask. The moment he donned the gear and felt the weight of the saber in his hand, it was clear: he had found his true passion. The studio became his sanctuary, and the sport, his new playground.

“I have always loved playing with swords. As a child I made swords out of cardboard, plastic, and anything I could find at home. I did not know anything about the sport of fencing until I watched Peter Westbrook Fencing alumna, Ibtihaj Muhammad, compete in the 2016 Olympic games in Rio De Janeiro. I was 8 years old and literally begged my mom to find the nearest fencing studio to our home. The day I stepped into that studio and borrowed my first saber and mask – I knew I had found home,” Inkosi recalled.

Today, Inkosi represents Nigeria on the fencing circuit, balancing his training and competitions with the demands of school and growing up. His journey from a young enthusiast crafting cardboard swords to a competitive fencer has been marked by dedication and hard work. 

He trains rigorously, honing his skills and strategy, with the goal of one day competing on the world stage and making his mark in the sport he loves.

Inkosi’s story is a testament to the power of inspiration and the transformative nature of pursuing one’s passions.

From the humble beginnings of homemade swords to the disciplined world of fencing, his journey embodies the spirit of determination and the pursuit of excellence. As he continues to sharpen his skills and chase his dreams, the fencing community watches with anticipation, eager to see where Inkosi’s remarkable journey will lead next.

However, Inkosi believes he has what it takes to make it to the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games.

“My goals are to qualify for the LA2028 Olympics for Nigeria, and fence at a division 1 level at an elite Ivy League University, studying engineering and business. I train intensively four times a week with two different Olympians at the Peter Westbrook Foundation. I incorporate mental and physical work into my training, as well as open bouting and conditioning. With my intensive training schedule, along with my study habits, I believe I can achieve all my goals,” he said.

The grandson of the former Director General of The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), late Prof. Dora Akunyili, added: “Personally, making the 2028 Olympics for Nigeria is my biggest goal. This season, I reached the quarter-finals of both the Zonal Olympic Qualifiers and Senior African Championships, a major milestone in my fencing career, as they were my first senior international tournaments ever. Despite losing to make the semi-finals of the Olympic Qualifiers by 1 point, 15-14, I think my accomplishment outlines a clear path to my goals in the next 4 years, which is to fence at a Division 1 level at an elite Ivy League University and compete at the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles for Nigeria. I also earned a silver medal at the FIE Satellite Senior World Cup, which was a major milestone for Nigerian fencing.”

[DailyTrust]

The Senator representing Borno South at the senate, Ali Ndume, has frowned at the rushed passage of the tax reform bills, saying that the hurry by the presidency and some lawmakers to pass the bills looks suspicious.

The tax reform bills which passed for second reading at the Senate on Thursday have triggered controversies since it was sent to the National Assembly by President Bola Tinubu, with Ndume maintaining strongest opposition against the bills.

The National Economic Council also advised President Tinubu to withdraw the bills, but the President said he preferred that they go through the processes.

The lawmaker, while speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Thursday, maintained his position and insisted that it is better for the Presidency to take the advice of the National Economic Council to withdraw the bill.

“It is not that I am totally saying that we should throw away the baby with the bath water, but since the governors who are our leaders, the National Economic Council and many individuals have said that it is not that we should throw away the bills, no.

“Withdraw the bill, do more consultations and then bring the bill again. Why are they in a hurry,” Ndume queried.

Backing up his claim that there is a rush to pass the tax reform bills, Ndume gave an instance of the Petrol Industry Bill which he said is more important than the tax bill, adding that it took years before it was passed.

He recalled that the PIB was introduced to the National Assembly when he was in the House of Representatives, but wasn’t passed until years later when he had moved to the Senate.

The Senator said one of his grouses with the tax reform bills is the timing, noting that such bills shouldn’t be introduced when Nigerians are struggling to survive.

According to him, the opposition to the bills by him and some others is not because people do not want to pay taxes, but the wrong timing.

“I disagree with the timing because Nigerians are struggling to survive. Our forefathers were paying tax, in the North we pay taxes.

“So, it is not like we are running away from tax, we pay taxes, every responsible Nigerian will want to pay tax, but the timing is wrong,” he said.

Ndume, who said the best time to present the bills is when there is no hunger, likened the bills to giving someone something with a right hand and taking it back with the left hand.

He added that his opposition of the bills is because he does not want Tinubu to fail contrary to some insinuations that it is to hurt the President.

[DailyPost]

• Tinubu pledges skills development for out-of-schoolchildren

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu yesterday affirmed Nigeria’s commitment to strengthening cooperation with France in key sectors such as food security, energy, solid minerals, education and security.

Tinubu made the pledgeduring a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris.

The two leaders later addressed a joint news conference. 

The President, according to a statement by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, also emphasised his administration’s commitment to skill acquisition training for Nigerians, especially children who have “been out of school for years”.  

Tinubu highlighted the vast and largely untapped potential within Nigeria’s agricultural sector.

He called on international investors to capitalise on opportunities in the sector.

“The French—Nigeria Business Forum is doing a lot already, but we need to do more on food security. We cannot help but invest in another country,” said the President.

Tinubu described Nigeria’s financial sector as a facilitator for foreign investment, particularly from French enterprises.

He said: “Nigeria’s financial sector is evolving and flourishing. We are also creating grounds for investment in Nigeria’s economy for French nationals, especially in food security.

“It is our responsibility to put together a food security programme for the private sector to come and invest in the country.

“We are working on stability and we are getting closer and closer, but we can do better and better.”

The President said Nigeria’s economy was being repositioned for more Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) that would directly impact Nigerians.

“I can assure you that Nigeria is open for business and close to this, we have a vibrant youth population that is educated, and ready to be trained in various areas of entrepreneurship and development,” Tinubu said.

He implored the French government to extend to Nigeria, trainings that would develop its youth population.

“Furthermore, we should de-risk the opportunities in the solid minerals. We have the potential and we have agreed on a deeper and deeper relationship,” the President added.

Tinubu noted that Nigeria, like most African nations, has been preoccupied with tackling food insecurity.

He said: “A starved nation will not care about weather or environment, and in the 21st century, no child should go to bed hungry.

“If an African child is given a glass of milk in a class, there will be no problem in getting him to return and stay in school to learn. The more educated the children are, the better it is for us.” 

President Tinubu said the blue economy in Nigeria also provides a huge opportunity for investment, with unexplored potential in fishery.

“In Lagos, we have tamed the Atlantic Ocean. For us, fishery is an important aspect of investment.

“We want to assure the French investment community that Nigeria is open for business. It shall be easy in and easy out,” he stated.

Tinubu outlined plans to significantly reduce the number of out-of-school children through innovative return-to-class initiatives and skills development programmes.

“To bridge the gap for some who are of age, and have been out of school for a while, we will encourage skills development,” he stated.

The President told Macron and his wife, Brigitte, that Nigeria’s developmental potential hinges on a well-educated populace.

He said although “insecurity in some parts of the country makes it hard for children to return to school, we are gradually re-populating the classrooms.”

“We need skills development to bridge the gaps,” the President added.

He also highlighted efforts by his administration to enhance security across the country.

“With some more efforts, we will be able to get some level of stability. We had a very good harvest this year and as soon as more farmers can go back to the farm, we will have more stability in harvest and supply,” Tinubu said.

On global security, the President noted that there was a need for collective responsibility to fight terrorism.

“Nigeria is a partner in progress. We are ready to partner with France so that we can have security operations that will stop the challenge of migration,” he said.

President Macron acknowledged the state visit by Tinubu, saying it will herald deeper bilateral relationships between the two countries.

He emphasised collaborative growth in creative industries and youth-focused initiatives.

Macron acknowledged Nigeria’s vast growth potential and the importance of investing in educational initiatives.

He reflected on his formative experiences during his six-month internship at the French Embassy in Nigeria.

Macron also noted that global humanitarian challenges could only be solved with governments working together.

He said: “We have confidence that you, Mr. President, will reinforce our relationship with Nigeria, and it will cover the West Coast region, with ECOWAS playing the leading role.

“I will seek your leadership to work as partners of progress. You are the great leader of the great country in Africa.

“We appreciate your visionary leadership and energy in transforming the economy of your country. We will work together for collective, global success,” he said.

The French leader assured that he would encourage more investments in Nigeria’s solid minerals sector. 

Both countries signed an agreement after Solid Minerals Development Minister Dele Alake made a presentation on the sector’s potential.

President Tinubu and First Lady Oluremi Tinubu were welcomed with full honours at Hotel Les Invalides and Palais De l’Élysée by Macron and his wife, Brigitte.

[TheNation]

The remaining states yet to implement the N70,000 minimum wage for workers are making last-minute moves to ensure the Nigeria Labour Congress does not embark on strike on Monday, December 1, The PUNCH has learnt.

The states yet to approve the monthly wage are Katsina, Cross River and Zamfara, after the Imo State Government sanctioned the implementation of the N70,000 wage on Tuesday.

It means 33 states and the Federal Capital Territory have now complied with the 2024 National Minimum Wage Act.

Many states agreed to pay above the N70,000 starting point with Lagos and Rivers offering the highest pay with N85,000.

Lagos also announced that its workers could smile to the bank with up to N100,000 monthly from the first quarter of 2025.

Workers in Akwa Ibom, Enugu, Oyo and Niger will earn N80,000 while Delta and Ogun states approved N77,000.

Ebonyi, Osun, Benue and Kebbi states approved N75,000; Ondo, N73,000; Kogi and Kaduna, N72,000; Kano and Gombe, N71,000.

Abia, Adamawa, Anambra, Jigawa, Borno, Edo, Kwara, Nasarawa, Taraba, Ekiti, Bauchi, Yobe, Imo and Plateau states, as well as the Federal Capital Territory, all settled for N70,000.

But despite the NLC’s warnings, trio Katsina, Zamfara and Cross River have yet to implement the new wage, which could lead to a shutdown of activities in the affected states from Monday.

On Monday, labour unions in Cross River, who are demanding a new wage of N70,000 from the state government, directed state civil servants to embark on a two-day warning strike over the non-implementation of the new minimum wage.

The warning strike was signed by the Nigerian Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress.

This followed a staged walkout from a scheduled meeting held on November 18 with state government officials, who formed members of the wage implementation committee at the office of the state’s Head of Service, Innocent Eteng, in Calabar, the state capital.

According to the labour leaders, last week, when the committee sat for the first time, the meeting ended in a stalemate when they perceived delayed tactics by the government to postpone the meeting to January.

The state’s civil servants said they were utterly disappointed when Governor Bassey Otu announced a new minimum wage of N40,000 on May 1, during the International Workers Day celebration at the U.J Essueine Stadium in Calabar.

Otu said that due to the state’s lean resources, caused by the statutory federal allocation aggravated by the unfavourable state Gross Domestic Product, the new minimum wage of N40,000 would be in line with realities rather than sentiments.

While giving instances of Edo, Lagos, Rivers and other governors, the workers said they were of high hope before the unexpected announcement of N40,000.

The strike action, which was signed by the Nigerian Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress, was set to commence from November 24 midnight to 26, 2024.

‘No going back’

The Cross River State Chairman, Nigeria Labour Congress, Gregory Ulayi, toild The PUNCH that the union would embark on an indefinite strike if the state government failed to implement the new minimum wage for the workers.

He noted that the two-day warning strike was embarked upon by workers in the state between Monday and Tuesday, which he described as a call to action to the government.

Ulayi said that after the two-day warning strike, all workers were mandated to return to work as they waited to hear from the state government.

“If the government does not negotiate and do the needful, we will embark on a total strike because it is a directive across the country,” Ulayi told The PUNCH

However, the Chief Press Secretary to Governor Otu, Nsa Gill, told our correspondent that the state government had set up a committee to negotiate with the labour leaders, as part of last-ditch efforts to prevent the looming strike on Monday.

He said that despite the nationwide deadline for the implementation of the minimum wage, the Otu-led government was working to ensure payment of a minimum wage of N70,000 or even above.

“The state government has a negotiating team and they are at work. Though, they are yet to reach an agreement as at today (Thursday). The government is ready to pay the N70,000 new minimum wage, if not beyond,” he stated.

“We recognise the fact that there is a national deadline from the labour union, which is slated for December 1, 2024, for all the states to pay the new minimum wage.

“We are trying to see how to build a stronger economic foundation that can make us pay a living wage to our civil servants. Until the team finishes the negotiation, the amount will not be announced. Right now, they are still on the negotiation table for an amicable resolution.”

Katsina State is also likely to face labour’s wrath after its failure to implement the compulsory new wage bill for the state workers.

Multiple sources in the NLC secretariat in Katsina, the state capital, told our correspondent on Thursday that the state was yet to approve the payment.

Last month, The PUNCH reported that the Katsina State Government inaugurated a 15-member committee to guide the implementation of a new minimum wage of N70,000.

Deputy Governor Faruk Lawal, while inaugurating the committee, said the government was aware of the hardship being faced by civil servants in the state.

“You are all aware that His Excellency, the Governor, Mallam Dikko Umar Radda, has set up a committee to implement the N70,000 minimum wage consequential adjustment to all categories of workers in the state.

“This includes the state civil servants, the Local Government employees and other categories of workers. The government is aware of the hardship being encountered by the civil servants,” he stated.

Led by Secretary to the State Government, Abdullahi Faskari, the committee was given three weeks to present strategies and recommendations, including the consequential adjustments for all categories of workers.

The committee includes prominent state officials such as the Head of Civil Service, Falalu Bawale; the state Commissioners for Finance, Budget and Economic Planning, and Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

Others are the Special Adviser to the Governor on Labor Matters; as well as representatives from the Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress, among others.

However, the latest reports suggest the committee has not been able to approve the wage.

“Katsina State is yet to implement the new minimum wage though the state has set up a committee in that regard,” a top NLC official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the matter, told The PUNCH.

“Negotiation between the labour unions and the government committee members are still ongoing. Anything can happen between now and in four days to come (as at Thursday), which is the December 1 deadline.”

Meanwhile, the Zamfara state Government says it has concluded arrangements for the implementation of the new minimum wage adding that it had been talking with the labour leaders in the state.

Speaking to The PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant to Governor Dauda Lawal on Media and Communications, Mustafa Jafaru Kaura, said the state government would implement the new wage as soon as possible.

He said, “The state government has already set up a committee to work out modalities for the implementation of the new minimum wage of N70,000.”

He stated that the state government wanted to know the exact number of its civil servants and the amount involved before settling the new wage.

Kaura added, “The committee has gone far in its assignment and I am telling you that as soon as the committee finishes its assignment, Governor Lawal will surely implement the new wage.”

Kaura stated that members of the committee included labour leaders and other stakeholders who were given the responsibility to work out the modalities on how best to implement the new wage.

He stressed that the state government would never fail the civil servants, adding that “Governor Dauda Lawal is one of the civil servants’ friendly governors in the country.”

“Zamfara workers will never be left out in terms of the new minimum wage,” he added.

“I want you to remember that when he assumed office as the Governor of the state, he met the state’s civil servants collecting  N18,000 as minimum wage.”

“He quickly directed the state’s ministry of finance to start implementing the N30,000 minimum wage which was done.’’

“So, I am assuring you that, the Governor will soon implement the new minimum wage for N70,000,” Kaura said.

Earlier in November, Governor Lawal reiterated his government’s resolve to pay the minimum wage after working out all necessary modalities.

He said, “We have to know what comes in, the number of our workforce, and what we will pay as minimum wage,” adding, “The welfare of my workforce has been my priority since I assumed office.”

 “When we came on board, for four months workers of the state had not been paid their salaries, and the first thing I did was to pay the workers.

“Today, as from the 25th of every month, I make sure that workers are paid. So, in other words, I spend about N5bn on wages every month. I paid my workers. I improved the salaries of local government staff as well as paid pensioners.

“So every month, I boost the state’s economy. If you go around, you will see how small traders are making brisk business from the goods they display in markets and streets.”

Commenting on the backlog of pension arrears he inherited from previous administrations, he said that out of the N13bn pension liabilities, he was able to settle over N11bn.

[Punch]