•We may not be able to pay salaries if bills are passed
•Says some southwest, southeast states may also have problems

Governor Babagana Umara Zulum of Borno State has rejected the tax reform bills, sponsored by President Bola Tinubu’s administration, saying the bills will destroy the north.

The bills which seek to prioritize the location of consumption as the basis for sharing Value Added Tax, have faced stiff opposition, especially from the north, with stakeholders calling for its withdrawal.

Northern governors, traditional rulers, and Northern Elders Forum have rejected the proposed bills, saying they were not in the interest of the nation. However, despite protests and rejections of the pieces of the legislation, the Senate passed the bills for second reading on Thursday despite rowdiness at plenary.

Speaking on the development in an interview with BBC Hausa service, the governor expressed displeasure over how the bills enjoyed speedy and smooth passage to the current phase when other bills had spent several years to scale through.

He said, “We condemn these bills transmitted to the National Assembly. They will drag the north backward, and not only the north, South East, South West and some states in the South West such as Oyo, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, will have problem with these bills.

“It is not opposition. This, based on our understanding, is something that will destroy the north in its entirety. Therefore, we call on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and others to review this decision. He secured 60% of his votes in the north. He should not listen to those telling him that northerners are not supporting him.

If our interest is served, that is all. What we need now is the withdrawal of the tax bills.
“Why all the rush! There’s a petroleum bill that was presented but it took almost 20 years before it was finally passed. But this one was transmitted and now receiving legislative attention within a week. What we are saying is that, let it be treated carefully and with caution so that even after our exit, our children would reap the benefits.

“How we see it is, if these bills scale through, we will not be able to even pay salaries. And if we paid, it won’t be sustainable the following year.”

Asked whether the bills would further exacerbate hunger and poverty in the north, Zulum answered in the affirmative, adding, “Including security. But they’re saying otherwise. We are against it, Lagos is against it; that it will drag it backwards. If this is the situation, then why won’t they rescind it? Our National Assembly members and even some from the Southern region are not in support of these bills.”
The governor, however, clarified that his objection of the bills was not a pointer of any opposition against the government, maintaining that it was only a call to reverse the decision.

“This is our stand and doesn’t mean that we are against the government. We supported and voted for him (President Tinubu). But these bills will not mean good for us.”

Asked to comment on whether the lawmakers would pass the bills when lobbied and given kickbacks, Zulum said, “There are rumours around but we are not certain. But you know we are in Nigeria! What I am saying is that let us all be patriotic. We have children, grandchildren and relatives who are in villages, therefore, we should be careful not to endorse anything that would impede the progress of the north and other regions. We are appealing to the President to listen to us and address our concerns.”

[Vanguard]

Your Chief of Staff, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila was my colleague during my time in the House. He knows me well and can confirm to you that I’m not given to frivolities. I write to you as a concerned Nigerian citizen praying for your success in tackling our country’s myriad problems. I have followed your journey closely – from your days as a democracy advocate with NADECO, through your involuntary exile to the UK; your return to Nigeria and subsequent emergence as Governor of Lagos State, and now, by the Grace of God, the President and Commander-in- Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. I am glad to have witnessed your leadership style and do believe that you possess both the capacity and the will to transform our beloved country if you so desire.

“O God of all creation; Grant this our one request; Help us to build a nation; Where no man is oppressed, and so with peace and plenty Nigeria may be blessed.”

This final stanza of our reintroduced national anthem aligns with the sentiments of many Nigerians, who, despite facing numerous challenges, remain resilient and optimistic about the future. Your administration’s decision to reinstate the original anthem at the beginning of your tenure in office appeared to signal some hope for good governance and nation-building.

You recognised that after more than sixty years of independence from colonialism, Nigeria is still far from nationhood and remains a country of diverse peoples in search of shared goals. Your implied vision of nation building resonated deeply with Nigerians, particularly those of us from the Niger Delta and other minority groups who continually face systemic marginalisation. If this prayer is indeed your vision for our country – then there is hope for light at the end of the tunnel!

Effective nation-building, however, demands strong and accountable leaders who demonstrate commitment not only through their reforms and actions, but by their body language as well. Please remember Mr. President as you embark on building a nation “not to speak is to speak, not to act is to act”

Having been born before the country’s independence from the colonial masters, I have had the privilege of living in a Nigeria that was once a land flowing with milk and honey, led by people with a conscience.

Between 1954 and 1964, Eastern Nigeria boasted the fastest-growing economy in the world. Up until 1980 the Naira exchanged for approximately $1.50 in international markets. Over the years, I have also witnessed the gradual and painful decline of our economy and core values. Political office is now perceived as an opportunity for personal gain rather than as a responsibility to serve the public. Those entrusted with overseeing public assets often brazenly convert them for personal enrichment, seemingly without repercussions.

Political power has become an instrument wielded, without remorse, for the benefit of office holders and their cronies. Public officials ignore the concerns of the people, confident of their immunity from consequences. I’m sure you will agree that this troubling trend, if allowed to continue, risks normalising unethical behavior among future leaders with dire and predictable implications for our grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Eighteen months after it has become your turn, I am hopeful that you will begin to address some of our major concerns moving forward. Recent nationwide protests underscored the fact that bad governance is viewed as our greatest obstacle to sustainable development.  The protests also presented an ongoing opportunity for you to change our narrative and inspire a renaissance of values and morality. A simple gesture such as committing to a zero-tolerance policy toward bad behavior can catalyze significant change, and many Nigerians stand ready to support any leader who embraces this ideal.

With the removal of fuel subsidies, you have already demonstrated the resolve to make the tough but inevitable decisions.  You have also for the most part surrounded yourself with people who hopefully share your vision for Nigeria. However, the growing perception of a dysfunctional judiciary, more interested in pursuing everything but true justice, raises alarms and could pose an insurmountable obstacle to your wonderful vision of nation-building.

 A Chatham House survey conducted in 2022, revealed that an astounding 61 percent of respondents anticipate bribery in court judgments. Many judgments, particularly in cases involving elections and political figures, appear to defy both logic and justice, fueling suspicions that they are influenced by external pressures rather than being grounded in the law. This erosion of public trust undermines the foundations that must be laid for us to even begin to dream of a functional society.

In such a society, the judiciary serves as a beacon of hope for ordinary citizens, ensuring justice and fairness. Its role in fostering accountability, promoting good governance, and advancing social progress cannot be overstated. If any meaningful progress is to be achieved toward this dream, it is essential for your administration – and indeed all Nigerians – to hold the judiciary to the highest standards of integrity ensuring it embodies the ideals of our national anthem. It must not be allowed to become a tool for anyone. “Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done.”

The hope for our nation lies in our collective ability to demand accountability and uphold the rule of law. As Desmond Tutu famously noted, “If you are silent in the face of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” In an ocean of chaos and confusion, it is imperative that the judiciary remains an island of sanity, stability and clarity.  This, unfortunately, appears very far from being the current reality.

 Of great concern also is the ongoing divestments of oil and gas assets by multinational companies in the Niger Delta. I hope that these activities are being conducted in a manner that ensures proper representation of the local inhabitants who will bear the consequences of the devastation left behind once the oil is exhausted and the companies have departed.

Additionally, the recent dissolution of a Niger Delta Ministry that was established with a clear mandate is also very troubling. I am uncertain how the newly formed Ministry of Regional Development will encompass this mandate and whether it can deliver on it more effectively.

I will withhold further comments until there is greater clarity on these developments. It might be quite revealing, however, if a searchlight was to be beamed on the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) but I will save that discussion for another time.

In closing, I share the hope of all patriotic Nigerians.

 “When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous and terror to evildoers.” (Proverbs 21:15)

 Long live Federal Republic of Nigeria!

Long live the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria!

With Senate Clearance yesterday, Lt Gen Oluyede has become the substantive Chief of Army Staff (COAS). He is, by all accounts, a thoroughbred professional soldier with no political flavorings. Confident in a very unobtrusive sort of way, sober, focused, methodical and not given to undue ceremonies and fripperies, the new COAS was once described by a peer of his to my hearing, years back, as someone who does not get involved in anything that is unnecessary. He is completely beholden to his professional calling and ocupies himself with it.

He is now heading an army that is overstretched and taking on what should ordinarily not be its business – such as deradicalization programmes and much more.  The soldiers we see on the road all over the country today have no business being there. The longer they are out there, performing policing duties and without strict professional military drills and supervision, the more “demobilized” they would be; from the standpoint of military discipline, grooming and readiness for combat.

The implication of the foregoing is that the new COAS is walking into an environment that is roundly beset with many asymmetrical security challenges that are partly contrived and partly avoidable. Imagine what the nation would have been like today if we had consistently enjoyed effective and responsible civilian leadership over the decay. The bulk of what our men in uniform are facing today simply won’t be there.

The more we look at some of the security problems facing many states of the federation today, the more we feel constrained to say that they are traceable to the antics of an out-of-touch leadership elite. The notion of leadership elite meant here goes beyond the purely political. It cuts across the political, business, traditional and religious leaders. They all seem to be working together, but apparently without intending it, to create an environment with unprecedented records of grinding poverty and unemployment.

The twin facts of poverty and unemployment have poured unto the national political and sociocultural landscape a massive population of unemployed, underemployed and also “unemployable” people. Many in the latter category are not unemployable by choice, no! They are unemployable either because they hold certificates they cannot defend, are morally so damaged that they cannot be trusted with responsibility or they simply have no skills and must be “retooled’ for them to be useful either to themselves or to the wider society.

Just think of the collapse of the educational system, particularly the dearth of vocational education for those who are not interested in pursuing an academic life and career. One of the questions we may wish to ask here today is this: “Would we be where we are today, in terms of national security challenges, if there had been serious and well thought out National Planning that is guided by strategic National Development Plans?

We have had, and still do have, “Episodic and Regime self-flagellation Plans and Programmes”. With these have come the reprehensible personalization of national resources by those charged with managing the resources on behalf of the people. Ethnic chauvinism and religious bigotry are easily recruited as major drivers of all the wrong things that are fueling insecurity in the country. And it would seem that the right lessons are still not being learnt

We see this every day and everywhere.  We have also had more than enough retreats, and summits, wherein we have wasted much of our time and national resources talking about the causes of insecurity, as if we do not know where it is all coming from. Conveners of the summits, conferences and retreats will always go out of their way to quote various authorities on the subject and then tell us about the effects of insecurity on the economy or the welfare of the people.

Well, we are the people. We know the effects. We cannot safely walk the streets without fear of one misfortune or the other. So, we know. So does the military and sundry security agencies. Yet, the business of talking takes over from the business of problem solving and some people even brag that they have been talking.

That’s why the Sultan of Sokoto said, at one such event about two years ago, that we had had enough of conferences and retreats on national security. Part of what could be inferred from the Sultan’s statement was that the Nigerian public is yet to fully apprise itself of the need for a holistic understanding of national security, as well as the specific roles assigned in principle and in fact to the military, particularly the Nigerian army, and the citizenry.

We can all see that, today, the Nigerian Army is the public scapegoat in all matters of national security, simply because it is the most visible symbol of the state wherever you look. That is why Oluyede needs, and must work with, a comprehensive facts-based overview of all dimensions of the current asymmetrical security challenges facing the Nigerian Army and as an Institution of State.

Banditry and insurgency are not inventions from outer space. Every bandit or insurgent has a local address. Intelligence about such an address can only mostly come from a cooperative civilian population.

That is why holistic perspective on the imperatives of a “whole of society approach to national security” demands of everyone a sense of responsibility towards those professionally charged with protecting the nation and the rest of us. We need informed linkages between political decisions and actions, the reflexes of the various strata of the elite and other less obtrusive stakeholders, in order to really address the security challenges in different parts of the country.

The people must fully appreciate the issues at the core of our national security challenges. This includes a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the key actors, as well as the dysfunctionalities that would inevitably arise whenever there is lack of synergy in the national security activity chain.

Intelligence gathering at community and other levels rests more on the willingness of the communities concerned to cooperate and collaborate, than it does on the military and security professionals deployed to various localities. Some of the challenges with tracing the whereabouts, and hideouts, of bandits and insurgents lies in the fact that this role of intelligence support from various localities is being observed in the breach.

Once this role is observed in the breach, with some communities and community leaders even nurturing, and facilitating, the very security threat the army is trying to deal with, the problems will only fester and get worse. As it stands today, the Nigerian Army is the public face of the war against banditry and insecurity. It has also become the people’s “Whipping Boy” for everything wrong with the safety of lives and property in Nigeria today.

We need to think seriously about some overlooked aspects of the security challenges facing the nation. They include the wrong attitudes of the civil populace towards the military and security agencies, conspiracy with embedded targets in communities, refusal to support security operations with local intelligence, the targeting of military personnel for hostile civilian attention, deliberate misrepresentation of the activities and achievements of the Nigerian Army through fake news, misinformation and disinformation, among others.

The new COAS is coming on board at a time that the nation desperately needs simple and implementable solutions, around the deeper motions of personal, community and environmental security that we have since abandoned. He is also coming on board to sustain the gains made by his predecessor, to ensure that the wrong idea that it is purely the job of the military, and the security agencies, to secure us, is summarily retired.

The civilian populace is not meant to just sit down and do nothing but watch the military “doing their job of securing us”. Communities which do not report the presence of strangers, suspicious characters, or even suspicious activities, to Institutions of State that exist to protect them only further endanger themselves and complicate our national security challenges.  

Undermining the nation’s efforts at improving security comes in the form of Attitudinal, or Orientational Asymmetry. It is a distortion, and disruption, of the right attitude every citizen should adopt in his response to the nation’s security personnel and problems. It is also one of the greatest asymmetrical security challenges facing Nigeria today.

Unless we approach national security issues with a proper sense of history, we might end up mistaking hysteria for substance. The citizen’s duty in the national security ecosystem must be reaffirmed, for everyone to identify with, understand and carry out his role in the national security ecosystem.

The new COAS is familiar with retreats, conferences and summits. He does not need to organize another one now, since these often offer mostly descriptive, and sometimes purely “lamentational”, submissions. Their detailed descriptions of the problems and the generalized recommendations without any clear implementation strategies are all too familiar.

The solutions to our current national security problems do not lie in the declaration of a State of emergency on national security, either. No verbal declaration of a state of emergency can make uncooperative communities to suddenly become cooperative. To urge anyone to declare a state of emergency will not dramatically raise the morale of officers and soldiers who are overstretched. Neither will it remove the fact that the job of our men in uniform is further complicated by the missteps of a civilian ruling elite that has created a massive pool of impoverished, unemployed, underemployed and unemployable youths with the wrong social skills.

The ongoing civil/military relations efforts should be ramped up, because the military needs the independent perspectives that would arise from such engagement. Ditto for the new programs for middle level officers and soldiers. It will all help improve the quality of soldiering, as well as public understanding of the roles, and achievements, of the Nigerian Army in the ongoing efforts to protect and secure the Nigerian State.

For this to happen, we need an overarching perspective that is focused on a “whole of society approach”. This is a critical success factor that we should focus on and press for, as Lt Gen Oluyede comes on board.

Pacts include diverse financial, technical assistance programmes worth over €300m 

•President upbeat Nigeria’s economic reform’ll impact Africa positively 

•Macron optimistic Tinubu will transform Nigeria’s economy like he did as Lagos Gov

President Bola Tinubu and his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron have signed two agreements that will ensure a partnership on the development of critical infrastructure and the long-term sustenance of agriculture and food security.

The partnership agreements, according to a statement by the Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, were signed at an economic forum attended by businessmen, captains of industry, governors, and some top government officials of both countries at the Palais des Elysée in Paris, France, during President Tinubu’s state visit.

Nigeria’s Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Wale Edun, and Mr. Armand signed the Letter of Intent.

According to the document: “The two countries affirmed their commitment to work together on investment and development of critical infrastructure, healthcare transportation, agricultural value chain, renewable energy, and human capital development, through diverse financial and technical assistance programmes, of over Euros 300m spread across all geopolitical zones in the country.

“The two countries committed to forge a strategic relationship in project implementation and enhance mutual trade and cross border services by removing fiscal barriers while protecting labour rights.” 

Minister of Finance, Edun, and Chief Executive Officer of the French Development Agency (AFD), Mr. Remi Rioux, signed another Letter of Intent to support the Renewed Hope Agenda reforms designed to stimulate and strengthen the economy.

“The Declaration”, the document stated, “ set out the enduring relationship between the AFD and the FRN, and the AFD’s continuing commitment to support the socio-economic growth of Nigeria through financing sustainable projects in urban infrastructure development, transportation network, housing infrastructure, human capital development through improved education specifically in STEM, agriculture, food security and healthcare.

“The AFD reaffirmed its commitment to long-term support of the Renewed Hope Agenda of Mr. President on energy access and transition, sustainable agriculture and food security by financing the improvement of agro-logistic hubs. Importantly, the AFD committed to supporting the real sector by providing capital from MSME in high-impact sectors.

“The Federal Republic of Nigeria also affirmed its support for the projects financed by the AFD and committed to ensure that the implementation of the projects are expedited efficiently.”

The two Presidents had earlier in Paris, the French capital witnessed the signing of the agreement by the United Bank for Africa (UBA) Group Chairman Tony Elumelu and  Mr. Antoine Armand, the French Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry for the bank to commence operations in Paris.

Zenith Bank also inaugurated its services in the country during the visit.

Meanwhile, Tinubu once more assured Nigerians that the ongoing reforms in Nigeria would improve Africa’s economic prospects.

Speaking Thursday night at the State Dinner organised by the French government for him at Palais des Elysée in Paris, the President said: “Regarding Nigeria’s economy, as you have said, we have embarked on a very strong reform, and there is no looking back. It is in the interest of the entire continent that we don’t continue in the past. We must brace up for the future with commitment and optimism. And with the courage of our founding fathers.

“President Macron, all your efforts about Africa, I promise you shall not be in vain,” he stated.

President Tinubu while noting that the future remained bright for better relations with France emphasised that he was glad to be leading Nigeria during the trying times of the nation.

His words: “It is a good time for all of us. I cannot be prouder than I am to be President of Nigeria at this challenging time. I have people who are very clearly inspired, who are determined to change the course of Africa by changing the rot of the past, blending a future that our children and grandchildren can hold, and be open, and be proud.”

The President also lauded the amicable relations with French President Emmanuel Macron, appreciating his interest in Africa.

He also expressed confidence that Macron’s goodwill would foster stronger bilateral ties, benefiting the entire continent.

The Nigerian leader encouraged both Nigerian and French citizens to uphold the cordial relationship shared by their nations.

First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu accompanied the President to the dinner, along with top Nigerian government officials, businessmen, and the Director-General of the World Trade Organisation, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

“It is a great honour for me to be here. And it’s been a great day because you have arranged a great reception.

“Appreciating that you have a good knowledge of Nigeria is not enough. Your warmth, your commitment, and your foresight in Africa are remarkable.

“You stirred my excitement and caught my attention as a leader. Thank you.

“France went through a lot to put freedom, democracy and commitment together. Your effort is very inspiring for us to work together. We have no choice but to build a continent that connects, resonates for its people, and cares about the people and development,” President Tinubu said.

He thanked the French leader and his wife, Brigitte, for the State Visit and the three-day reception.

“In addition to the economic prospects and what you mean to Europe, to America and the African continent, there is a good prospect that you will not forget who we are. You open your doors for investment for our friends and brothers here. I could see Aliko Dangote, Aig Imoukhuede, and Tony Elumelu here. You have memories of your friends in Nigeria.  You asked for Mike Adenuga earlier today. Thank you,” he added.

In his remarks, President Macron acknowledged Nigeria’s leadership in Africa, recognising its role as a ‘big brother’ to the continent.

He praised Nigerians for their resilience and intellect, mentioning Nobel Laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka and musician Femi Kuti as global figures.

“Nigeria is a formidable country with talented young people. Many Nigerians are exceptional in their chosen careers.

“You conquered military rule and took your liberty. President Tinubu transformed the economy in Lagos, and now you are on a mission to transform the country,” he stressed.

Macron noted that French investors have long been active in Nigeria, particularly in oil, gas, construction, and food security.

[Thisday]

THIS week, as I refueled my car, I couldn’t help but be struck by the sharp contrast between petrol prices here in Metro Atlanta and in Nigeria.

In Metro Atlanta, fuel prices hover at $2.70 per gallon, which is equivalent to around 67 cents per liter.  (Four liters make up a gallon.) Translating this into naira reveals a stark discrepancy. At the current exchange rate of 1,647 naira to the dollar, a gallon of petrol in Atlanta equates to approximately 5,200 naira or 1,102 naira per liter. That’s astonishingly cheaper than Nigeria’s prevailing rate of around 1,300 naira per liter.

This disparity grows even more troubling in light of the wildly differential minimum wage standards between Nigeria and the United States. In the United States, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, which amounts to roughly $1,200 a month. Converted into naira, this comes to nearly 1,974,000 (one million, nine hundred and seventy-four thousand) naira.

Note that almost no one earns the minimum wage. Even the lowest remunerated workers here earn above the minimum wage. For example, my 16-year-old daughter who works at an entertainment restaurant chain on weekends earns $13 an hour.

Meanwhile, the federal minimum wage in Nigeria is a piddling 70,000 naira, or around $42.55. In other words, Nigerians with a minimum wage of 70,000 per month pay a higher rate at the pump than Atlantans with a minimum wage of 1.9 million naira per month.

When one presents these figures, defenders of past and present Nigerian regimes— and clueless, stonyhearted neoliberal evangelists— often argue that it’s fruitless to compare Nigeria with the United States, the world’s largest economy.

Yet, it’s worth noting that the U.S. does not indulge in the luxuries afforded to Nigeria’s ruling political elites. For instance, while American presidents pay for their own meals, including the meals of their guests, Nigeria allocates billions for the upkeep of its first families.

Such contrasts illustrate not merely economic differences but also the broader question of public accountability and fiscal priorities.

In much of the developed world, government subsidies for fuel are deemed vital, particularly where public transport systems are not robust. In the U.S., for example, state governments sometimes provide targeted subsidies to cushion residents from high fuel prices.

The lower fuel prices in America are facilitated by state subsidies aimed at counterbalancing a lack of comprehensive public transit options, as is the case in Western Europe.

For instance, the governor of Georgia, Governor Brian Kemp, recently decided to suspend fuel taxes in Georgia following Hurricane Helene, which temporarily reduced petrol prices to around $2.50 per gallon. This is typical all over the United States.

The Center for Investigative Reporting found that the true cost of petrol in the United States is $15 per gallon, that is, $3.75 per liter. Converted into naira, that would amount to 24,648.90 naira per gallon or 6,162.23 naira per liter. But the average pump price of petrol in the United States is $3.16 per gallon.

(Gas prices can vary greatly within each state, with Texas having the lowest price of $2.669 per gallon and California the highest price at $4.68 per gallon. Note that California’s minimum wage is almost twice the federal minimum wage at $16.00 an hour.)

Americans don’t pay the actual cost of petrol because their state governments spend billions to subsidize their petrol consumption. According to the IMF, which has demonized fuel subsidies in the developing world, compelled governments to remove subsidies, and recruited scorn-worthy traitors to brainwash poor people into accepting that subsidies are bad for them, the United States spent $757 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in 2022 alone.

Globally, the IMF said, “subsidies surged to a record $7 trillion [in 2022] as governments supported consumers and businesses during the global spike in energy prices caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the economic recovery from the pandemic.” That represents 7 percent of global GDP.

U.S. state governments spent a significant sum on fuel subsidies, largely as part of measures to alleviate the impact of elevated energy costs. These measures included gas tax holidays, direct consumer grants, and discounts, aiming to shield residents from the global surge in fuel prices following supply disruptions caused by international events like the Ukraine crisis.

These interventions illustrate the fiscal lengths governments are willing to go to stabilize fuel costs for their citizens amid economic challenges.

Countries as diverse as Egypt and Indonesia have similarly leveraged fuel subsidies to maintain price stability, alleviate poverty, and stimulate their economies. These examples illuminate a fundamental principle that subsidies, when properly managed, can serve as powerful tools to bridge income disparities and invigorate economic growth.

But not Nigeria. Nigerians face relentless economic strain despite residing in an oil-producing nation. It’s a country where, somehow, people have been persuaded by a sophisticated mob of well-compensated spin doctors that exorbitant fuel prices are an unavoidable reality to which they must resign themselves.

For a resource-rich nation, which is also among the poorest globally, this is a bitter, disconcerting irony.

Those who denounce subsidies as inefficacious or detrimental often betray a limited understanding of their societal role, or worse, they may advocate for policies that consolidate wealth at the top.

In societies grappling with inequality, subsidies can mean the difference between bare survival and a modest but dignified life for millions.

To disparage such measures, particularly in a nation with profound economic inequalities, is to endorse a vision of society that is untenably divided—and to invite criticism that should rightly be directed not only toward them but, if you’ll pardon the expression, toward the legacy of those who espouse such values.

It is a grave irony, and a deeply unjust one, that the people of Nigeria — a nation abundantly blessed with oil wealth — must endure petrol prices that surpass those of Atlanta, a city in one of the world’s richest nations. This, while the average Nigerian subsists on a minimum wage of approximately $45 a month, a pittance that could scarcely fill a tank, let alone sustain a family.

The removal of petrol subsidies is not merely an economic policy; it is a sentence handed down to the already struggling, forcing countless Nigerians to choose between transportation, sustenance, and survival. The ripple effects are evident in unchecked inflation spirals, faltering businesses, and tragic loss of lives in the wake of avoidable hardship.

To govern is to protect, to prioritize the well-being of the many over the convenience of the few. To abandon subsidies under the guise of fiscal responsibility while the vulnerable teeter on the edge of despair is neither responsible nor just. It is, instead, an abdication of moral duty.

President Tinubu should restore the subsidies, not as a concession, but as an obligation to the people he is obligated to serve. To do so is not to admit defeat but to affirm humanity, to wield governance as a tool of compassion rather than austerity.

After all, what use is a nation’s wealth if it is not deployed in the service of its citizens? Let Nigeria’s oil be a blessing once more, not a bitter reminder of inequalities entrenched and lives disregarded.

A former Minister of Aviation, Osita Chidoka, has announced his resignation from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Chidoka, who was also the Corps Marshal of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), disclosed this during his appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Friday.

He said he is leaving politics to focus on his non-profitable organisation, Athena Centre to join hands with other Nigerians who are interested in reforming the political system in Nigeria.

“Earlier today, I sent a letter to my ward in Anambra State resigning officially from the PDP. I am leaving the PDP, I am leaving politic for some time, I am focusing on the Athena Centre,” Chidoka said on the programme.

“I will work in concert with other Nigerians who want us to reform the political system to bring evidence-based governance and to support it. So, effective today, I am no longer a member of the Peoples Democratic Party.”

‘Edo election compromised’

Athena Centre founded by Chidoka conducted a review of the recently concluded governorship election in Edo State where the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Monday Okpebholo, was declared winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), defeating closest challenger, Asue Ighodalo of the PDP.

The Athena Centre indicted INEC, stating that the election was compromised.

According to Chidoka, who presented the Centre’s findings on the Edo State election, there was substantial evidence of systemic rigging.

“The evidence of systemic rigging observed in this election is so substantial that we cannot call the results.

“The evidence of systemic rigging is so substantial that we think that this election should not be allowed to stand. If this stands, then there is no election in 2027.”

He said he is shocked that an institution like INEC will put its reputation at stake for the purpose of an election.

The former minister alleged that there was lack of transparency in the election and discrepancies in voter accreditation.

He also alleged incidences of overvoting, manipulation at ward collation centres and that the BVAS accreditation record was not transmitted to INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV).

He stated that 153 polling units were not accounted for which means there were no results from those polling units.

He concluded that the Edo State election cannot be deemed credible because it failed to meet basic integrity standard due to substantial interference in the electoral process by the umpire.

[Channels]

Barely weeks into his tenure as the governor of Edo State, Monday Okpebholo finds himself at the center of an unrelenting storm of political distractions. These challenges are primarily emanating from the camp of his predecessor, Godwin Obaseki, and his loyalists. While political transitions often involve disagreements, the incessant nature of these attacks risks undermining Okpebholo’s administration before it gains full momentum. For the sake of the people of Edo State, it is imperative that this trend ends so the new governor can focus on fulfilling his mandate.

For instance, the Edo State chapter of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) recently leveled serious allegations against Governor Okpebholo. At a press conference, Dr. Anthony Aziegbemi, the caretaker chairman of the PDP in Edo State, accused Okpebholo of squandering over ₦30 billion supposedly left behind by the Godwin Obaseki administration within 14 days of taking office. The funds, he claimed, were used to compensate political “godfathers” who facilitated Okpebholo’s electoral victory.

Additionally, Aziegbemi alleged that Okpebholo had procured ₦5 billion worth of vehicles without following due process and was attempting to justify ₦2 billion as inauguration costs. He also criticized the APC-led administration for failing to pay November salaries on time, a deviation from the prompt payments that characterized the Obaseki era.

While these accusations are concerning, they have not been substantiated with concrete evidence. The Edo State government, through Fred Itua, Chief Press Secretary to Governor Okpebholo, has strongly denied these claims, labeling them as baseless propaganda intended to tarnish the new administration. Itua also stated that the government was committed to exposing the alleged rot left behind by Obaseki’s administration, setting the stage for a clash of narratives.

In response to the allegations, Governor Okpebholo announced the formation of a 14-member State Assets Verification Committee. The committee was tasked with reviewing the handover process and ensuring transparency in the management of state resources. While this move might seem like a logical step toward accountability, it has been met with sharp criticism from Obaseki’s camp.

Crusoe Osagie, media aide to Godwin Obaseki, dismissed the probes as a “circus of meaningless theatrics,” accusing Okpebholo of using them as a smokescreen to distract from his lack of preparedness for governance. Osagie argued that Okpebholo’s focus on investigations rather than delivering tangible results was indicative of an administration that had no clear developmental agenda.

Osagie further touted Obaseki’s achievements, including the creation of Edo State’s first-ever asset register, and accused Okpebholo of attempting to rewrite the narrative surrounding the transition process. He went on to suggest that the probes were motivated by the interests of Okpebholo’s alleged political godfathers, who were seeking revenge for being denied access to state resources during Obaseki’s tenure.

It is evident that the ongoing squabbles between the camps of Obaseki and Okpebholo are less about governance and more about political dominance. Obaseki, who defected to the PDP after a fallout with the All Progressives Congress (APC), spent much of his second term battling political adversaries. His administration, while praised in some quarters for reforms, was also criticized for alienating key stakeholders.

Okpebholo’s emergence as governor under the APC banner signaled a return to power for the party in Edo State. However, rather than accepting this reality, Obaseki’s loyalists seem intent on undermining the new administration. By focusing on unsubstantiated allegations and dismissing every move made by the governor, they risk creating an atmosphere of perpetual instability in the state.

Lost in this political tug-of-war are the people of Edo State, who stand to lose the most from these distractions. Edo citizens elected Okpebholo with the hope that he would address pressing issues such as unemployment, poor infrastructure, and economic stagnation. Every minute spent on political mudslinging and counter-allegations is a minute lost in addressing these challenges.

It is essential for both parties to remember that governance is about serving the people, not settling political scores. The PDP and Obaseki’s camp must understand that their time in power has ended and allow the new administration to focus on its agenda. Similarly, Governor Okpebholo must rise above the noise and concentrate on delivering the promises that got him elected.

While the probes initiated by Okpebholo’s administration are essential for ensuring accountability, they must not become the centerpiece of his tenure. Governance should prioritize development, not endless investigations. The governor must strike a balance between holding the previous administration accountable and driving forward his vision for Edo State.

If Obaseki’s administration was as transparent as it claims, then the probes should not pose a threat. Instead of resisting them, Obaseki’s loyalists should cooperate with the process to prove their innocence. At the same time, Okpebholo must ensure that the investigations are thorough, fair, and devoid of political vendettas.

For Edo State to move forward, both the ruling and opposition parties must prioritize the state’s development over their personal or political interests. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it must be based on facts and presented responsibly. Opposition for opposition’s sake benefits no one, least of all the citizens of Edo State.

Governor Okpebholo, on his part, must remain focused on governance. Key areas that require immediate attention include the prompt payment of salaries, improvement of public infrastructure, and creating a conducive environment for economic growth. By delivering tangible results, he can win the trust of Edo people and silence his critics.

Edo State cannot afford to be trapped in a cycle of political vendettas. The time has come for all stakeholders to set aside their differences and work toward a common goal: the progress and prosperity of Edo State. Obaseki’s loyalists must recognize that their time in power is over and allow the new administration to function without unnecessary interference.

As for Governor Okpebholo, his mandate is clear. The people of Edo State have placed their trust in him to deliver meaningful development and address the challenges facing the state. It is up to him to prove that their trust was not misplaced.

The distractions must end. Let Monday Okpebholo work.

It is not an exaggeration to opine that Senator Jimoh Ibrahim’s recent remarks on Nigeria’s borrowing strategy during an interview on Channels TV have sparked heated debate. The billionaire-turned-politician advocated for the country to take on substantial loans of at least $50 billion to address infrastructure deficits and economic stagnation. While he passionately defended his stance, likening it to Dubai’s $168 billion infrastructure-driven transformation, this proposal is worrisome for many Nigerians already grappling with the crushing effects of excessive borrowing.

Senator Ibrahim’s argument, though seemingly bold, raises critical questions about Nigeria’s debt culture, the track record of managing borrowed funds, and the implications for future generations. Before we plunge headlong into further debt, it is essential to critically analyze the senator’s suggestions and the broader implications of his proposals.

Comparing Nigeria’s borrowing needs to Dubai’s experience is flawed. Dubai’s debt-fueled development was guided by visionary leadership, meticulous planning, and stringent accountability. It was also supported by a relatively small population and a thriving tourism sector capable of generating substantial revenue to service its debts.

Nigeria, on the other hand, faces systemic challenges, including widespread corruption, lack of accountability, and a history of mismanaging borrowed funds. Despite decades of loans from institutions like the World Bank and IMF, critical sectors like health, education, and infrastructure remain in disarray. Senator Ibrahim’s suggestion of borrowing $50 billion is akin to pouring water into a leaking bucket unless these systemic issues are first addressed.

As of now, Nigeria’s debt profile is already staggering, with external debts exceeding $40 billion. Servicing this debt consumes a significant portion of the nation’s revenue, leaving little room for developmental projects. The recently approved $2.2 billion loan, which Ibrahim dismisses as “insignificant,” adds to this burden. If we were to follow his advice and borrow $50 billion or more, future generations would inherit a mountain of debt, with little guarantee of corresponding economic returns.

Senator Ibrahim’s assertion that loans will be used exclusively for transformative infrastructure projects is, unfortunately, hard to believe. Nigeria’s history is littered with instances of poorly executed or abandoned projects despite hefty loans. The Ajaokuta Steel Plant, for instance, consumed billions of dollars over decades but has yet to deliver on its promise.

Without stringent safeguards, transparency, and accountability, there is no assurance that new loans will be used effectively. The senator’s call for legislative oversight and penalties for fund mismanagement is laudable, but Nigeria’s weak institutions and the politicization of oversight functions make such measures difficult to implement in practice.

Given the foregoing backdrop, it is germane to opine in this context that Nigeria should begin to look towards alternatives to Borrowing.   Rather than saddling the nation with more debt, Nigeria should prioritize harnessing its vast resources to generate revenue. The country boasts abundant natural resources, a large and youthful population, and untapped sectors like agriculture, technology, and renewable energy.

In fact, there is the need to expand revenue generation. Therefore, the government should focus on diversifying its revenue streams beyond crude oil. By investing in agriculture, manufacturing, and technology, Nigeria can create jobs and boost exports.

In a similar vein, there is the need to cut wasteful spending. This is as a significant portion of the nation’s revenue is lost to corruption, inefficiency, and excessive government spending. Reducing wasteful expenditures and plugging revenue leaks can free up funds for critical projects.

Also, instead of borrowing, the government should explore Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to fund infrastructure projects. PPPs have proven effective in many countries and can provide the necessary expertise and funding without burdening the nation with debt.

Also in a similar vein, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) should be encouraged. In fact, creating a conducive business environment can attract foreign investors, who can fund infrastructure projects and drive economic growth.

It is crucial to reflect on Nigeria’s borrowing history before embarking on another borrowing spree. The Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) of the 1980s, introduced under heavy borrowing conditions, left a legacy of economic hardship. The same pattern has repeated itself with recent loans, intended for development but diverted or mismanaged, leaving the masses worse off.

At this juncture, it is expedient to say a word to Senator Jimoh Ibrahim.  Oga Jimoh, while your intentions may be good, your proposal ignores the harsh realities of Nigeria’s economic and governance challenges. Borrowing “good money” is not a panacea; it is a recipe for chronic dependency if not paired with robust economic reforms and strict accountability measures.

Your comparison of Nigeria to Dubai overlooks the unique circumstances that made Dubai’s borrowing strategy successful. Nigeria cannot afford to gamble its future on a debt-driven model without first fixing its systemic issues.

Moreover, your suggestion that Nigeria negotiate debt forgiveness after accumulating more debt raises ethical and practical concerns. The global financial system is not a charity, and such an approach risks tarnishing the nation’s reputation and creditworthiness.

Nigeria’s path to economic prosperity lies not in reckless borrowing but in prudent financial management, strategic investments, and leveraging its immense human and natural resources. While infrastructure development is critical, it must be achieved sustainably without mortgaging the future.

Oga Jimoh, Nigeria does not need lessons in becoming a chronic debtor. What it needs are leaders who can think innovatively, act decisively, and prioritize the long-term well-being of the nation over short-term gains. The solutions to our economic challenges lie within us, not in the coffers of foreign creditors.

As Christmas 2024 approaches, many are filled with anxiety instead of anticipation. The economic challenges gripping the nation have left many wondering how they will celebrate the holiday. Rising prices, shrinking incomes, and increasing responsibilities create a perfect storm of worry. But in times like these, we are reminded of a profound truth: worrying achieves nothing.

Corrie ten Boom captured this beautifully when she said, “Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength.” Worry magnifies our challenges and blinds us to the blessings already at hand. For Christians, Christmas is more than a celebration; it is a reminder of God’s love and provision through the gift of Christ. This season, let us focus on faith, not fear, trusting in the One who has always been faithful.

Worry is as old as humanity, yet it remains as ineffective as ever. It thrives on uncertainty, exaggerating potential problems while robbing us of peace and joy. During the festive season, worry often centers on material needs: gifts, decorations, and elaborate meals.

However, worrying about what we cannot control serves no purpose. The Bible speaks clearly about the futility of worry. In Matthew 6:27, Jesus asks, “Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?” The answer is obvious. Worry changes nothing about tomorrow; it only steals the joy and strength needed for today.

This year has been marked by economic challenges, and the Christmas season may feel like an added burden rather than a time of celebration. Families are questioning how to afford the festivities, and the thought of disappointing loved ones is causing anxiety.

But Christmas is not about material abundance; it is about the abundance of God’s love. The story of Christ’s birth in a humble manger is a powerful reminder that simplicity and faith are at the heart of the season. When we strip away the commercial trappings, we find that the true essence of Christmas is peace, hope, and joy, gifts that cannot be purchased.

At this juncture, it is not out of place to recall what the Bible says about Worry.  In fact, the Bible offers timeless wisdom on dealing with anxiety, particularly during challenging times. Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount is a treasure trove of guidance. In Matthew 6:25–34, He instructs us not to worry about what we will eat, drink, or wear. Instead, He calls us to trust in God’s provision, pointing to the birds of the air and the lilies of the field as examples of His care.

Jesus’ message is simple yet profound: “Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own” (Matthew 6:34). This call to live one day at a time is especially relevant during the holiday season.

“Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.”

While it is wise to plan for Christmas and be mindful of our financial situation, there is a difference between realistic concern and restless anxiety. Concern is rooted in the present, prompting us to take practical steps. Anxiety, however, is fixated on the future, dwelling on uncertainties and worst-case scenarios.

This distinction is crucial. Concern leads to action, budgeting, simplifying plans, or seeking creative ways to celebrate. Anxiety, on the other hand, leads to paralysis, robbing us of joy and productivity.

The Bible calls us to focus on today. God has placed us in the present moment, with the resources and opportunities needed for this day. The past is closed, and the future is under God’s control. Our role is to trust Him and steward the present wisely.

As we prepare for Christmas 2024, let us anchor our hearts in God’s promises. He has assured us of His faithfulness, even in the hardest times.

Against the backdrop of the foregoing view, consider these verses:  “Call upon Me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you shall glorify Me” (Psalm 50:15), “Cast your burden on the Lord, and He shall sustain you; He shall never permit the righteous to be moved” (Psalm 55:22),   and “Casting all your care upon Him, for He cares for you” (1 Peter 5:7).

These words remind us that God is not indifferent to our struggles. He sees, He cares, and He provides.

At this juncture, it is expedient to in this context familiarize you with practical steps to celebrate the oncoming Christmas without worry.

The first step is to simplify your celebration. This can be achieved by focusing on the meaning of Christmas, rather than material expectations. This is as simple acts of love and togetherness often create the most memorable moments.

In a similar vein, it expedient to set a realistic budget.  Plan within your means. Homemade gifts, shared meals, and creative decorations can be just as meaningful as expensive alternatives.

Not to be neglected is to pray about your needs. This can always be done by bringing your concerns to God in prayer, as well as trusting Him to provide what you need, and be open to seeing His provision in unexpected ways.

In a similar vein, prayerfully cultivate the attitude of gratitude. Reflect on the blessings you already have, from family and friends to health and faith. The reason for adopting the attitude of gratitude cannot be farfetched as it shifts our focus from lack to abundance.

Another step to take is to focus on giving. This is as true joy comes from giving, not receiving. Look for ways to bless others, even if it is through small gestures like a heartfelt note or a simple meal shared.

In fact, the true essence of Christmas is not found in lavish feasts or expensive gifts. It is found in the celebration of God’s greatest gift: the birth of Jesus Christ. The angels who announced His birth did not proclaim wealth or prosperity; they proclaimed peace and goodwill to all.

This season, let us return to the simplicity and wonder of that first Christmas. Whether we have much or little, we can find joy in God’s presence and the love we share with others.

Why worry about how 2024 Christmas will be celebrated when there is God? Worrying will not lower prices or increase income, but faith will sustain us through the challenges.  Remember the six words that can transform your mindset this season:  “Worry about nothing; pray about everything.”

As we prepare for the festivities, let us hold onto the peace that comes from trusting God. With Him, we have all we need to celebrate Christmas, not in material abundance, but in the richness of His love and grace.

It is no more news to announce that the Bola Tinubu-led Nigerian government recently sent a delegation to India to assess the safety and viability of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as an alternative fuel. However, this initiative has sparked controversy, not because of its purpose but due to the curious composition of the team sent for the task. Among those chosen were comedians and skit makers, including “Ola of Lagos” and Basketmouth. This decision has left not a few Nigerians questioning the seriousness of the government’s intentions and the direction of the country’s energy policy.

In a nation grappling with escalating transportation costs and the aftermath of subsidy removal, this choice of delegation has drawn ire across social media. Critics argue that by sidelining engineers, researchers, and experts in favor of entertainers, the government has undermined public trust in the credibility of its CNG policy.

India’s journey with CNG adoption offers a Masterclass in how to transition to alternative energy sources. Faced with alarming air pollution levels and an over-reliance on imported petroleum, India methodically introduced CNG as a sustainable alternative. This was achieved through a structured approach that cut across expert-driven implementation, infrastructure development, and public engagement.

To put explanatorily put the foregoing view, it is expedient to recall that India engaged engineers, environmental scientists, and energy policy specialists to spearhead its CNG rollout, even as research institutions conducted rigorous safety tests, ensuring public confidence in the new fuel.

Analyzed from the perspective of infrastructure development, before mandating CNG use, India invested heavily in pipelines, refueling stations, and vehicle conversion kits. This infrastructure minimized disruption for drivers and ensured accessibility.

Not only that, India embarked on robust and well-coordinated public engagement as all authorities in the country were compelled to conduct awareness campaigns, educating the populace on the benefits of CNG, even as incentives for vehicle conversions further boosted public acceptance.

Today, cities like Delhi boast extensive CNG networks that have reduced air pollution, saved costs, and set a benchmark for energy transitions.

Given the foregoing narrative, it is not out of place to opine that Nigeria’s CNG rollout: A Comedy of Errors?

In contrast, Nigeria’s approach has been marked by poor planning and, as critics argue, misplaced priorities. The decision to send comedians and skit makers to India for a safety assessment typifies a broader trend of trivializing critical policy issues.

As gathered from a news story titled, “Nigerians Kick As FG Sends Comedians, Skitmakers To India To Assess CNG Safety” dated, Thursday, 28 November 2024, and published on Reuben Abati news blog, social media erupted with reactions to the delegation, many of which were scathing. A user, @ourfavoriteonlinedoc, lamented, “They didn’t send professors of engineering. They didn’t send PhD researchers or MSc students from our best universities. They sent Ola of Lagos, who will come back just to roll on the floor and scream, ‘Put CNG in your car; you will love it.’ What a shame.”

Another user, @Arikeade, questioned the government’s preference for content creators over professionals, while @frankobaressi called the delegation emblematic of a leadership culture that defies logic. “This is what happens when touts handle the affairs of this nation,” he remarked.

In fact, the risks of neglecting expertise is costly. The uproar is not without basis. CNG, while celebrated for its affordability and environmental benefits, is not without risks. In Nigeria, concerns about the safety of CNG vehicles have grown following reported explosions. These incidents underscore the need for a meticulous safety assessment conducted by engineers and energy specialists, not entertainers.

Moreover, the optics of the government’s decision to send skit makers instead of technical experts weaken public confidence. Citizens question whether their leaders are genuinely committed to solving the country’s energy challenges or are merely staging another political performance.

However, irrespective of the uproar which the initiative has generated, particularly on social media platforms, the role of skit makers in national discourse cannot be pooh-poohed.

To be fair, skit makers and content creators hold significant influence in shaping public opinion, especially among younger demographics. Their inclusion in promotional campaigns could serve to popularize CNG adoption. However, sending them as the primary assessors of safety and quality raises serious questions about priorities and competence.

In fact, there is a clear distinction between leveraging influencers for public sensitization and tasking them with responsibilities that demand technical expertise. Nigeria’s decision to turn these roles into a show of comedy reflects a lack of strategic planning that could undermine the credibility of its CNG initiative.

Without a doubt, it is expedient we learn from India as it would unarguably serve as pathways for Nigeria.  In fact, if Nigeria hopes to replicate India’s success with CNG, it must prioritize expertise and infrastructure development, and it can be achieved by engaging professionals.

To the end of the foregoing, the government should involve engineers, energy specialists, and safety experts to conduct comprehensive assessments of CNG infrastructure and technology. Their findings will form the backbone of a credible rollout strategy.

In a similar vein, there is the need for Investment in Infrastructure. Without adequate pipelines, refueling stations, and conversion kits, the promise of affordable CNG will remain hollow. Nigeria must prioritize these investments to ensure accessibility for drivers nationwide.

Also, public awareness and incentives should not be ignored. Like India, Nigeria should conduct awareness campaigns highlighting the benefits and safety of CNG, even as offering subsidies for vehicle conversions could also encourage adoption.

Given the foregoing, it is expedient to note that skit makers and influencers can play a valuable role in educating the public, but their involvement should be limited to outreach efforts, not technical assessments.

In fact, the backlash against the government’s choice of delegation reflects broader frustrations with Nigeria’s governance. For many citizens, the decision symbolizes a pattern of misplaced priorities and disregard for expertise.

Also, the transition to CNG holds immense potential to reduce transportation costs, curb pollution, and diversify Nigeria’s energy portfolio. However, realizing this potential requires leadership that values competence over theatrics.

Without a doubt, Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The decision to send comedians and skit makers to assess CNG safety may be a moment of levity, but it also underscores the critical need for a paradigm shift in governance. To build a sustainable energy future, Nigeria must learn from India’s playbook: prioritize expertise, invest in infrastructure, and engage the public meaningfully.

Until then, the joke may very well be on us, a nation that has yet to decide whether it is serious about progress or content to laugh at its own missteps.