OTHERS' VIEWS

OTHERS' VIEWS

I will begin this week's edition of what is becoming our regular weekly discourse — Civic Insights with an anonymous quote: "Policy is the pen of governance; the ink is the will of the people." This was why it is a common consensus among developed countries that public leadership must evolve with the needs of the people.

Leadership, in its truest sense, is not just about the exercise of power but about creating a meaningful connection between those who lead and those who are led. In the context of Nigeria, this principle is particularly relevant as we enter the second year of the current administration, with tough decisions like Local Government autonomy being ordered, awaiting appropriate enforcement and/or implemention. Bridging the gap between leaders and the people is not only a moral imperative but also a practical necessity for sustainable governance and development. In this piece, I intend to offer my two kobo on how leadership can move from mere rhetoric to effective representation through empathy, accessibility, and accountability.

Empathy is the cornerstone of effective leadership. Leaders must place themselves in the shoes of their constituents, understanding their struggles, dreams, and aspirations. Incidentally, Nigeria has homogeneous socioeconomic problems. Across the length and breathe of the country, the challenges of the citizenry range from inadequate infrastructure to youth unemployment, a leader must prioritize these pressing issues.

As Mahatma Gandhi aptly said, "The best way to find yourself is to lose it in the service of others." This means leaders must actively listen to the people, engaging with them through town hall meetings, grassroots campaigns, and direct community interactions. Empathy fosters trust, and trust is the foundation of any meaningful relationship between leaders and the people.

Of note is the fact that leadership is not about residing in an ivory tower; it is about being accessible to the people. The perennial physical and psychological distance between Leaders and constituents, which we notice in Nigeria, often creates a vacuum filled with mistrust and apathy. A Councilorship aspirant for Garki Ward must be readily available to address grievances and offer homegrown solutions to the palpable needs and challenges of Garki people; same goes to the Chairmen, Governors etc.

As John Maxwell observed, "People don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care." Accessibility means breaking barriers through open-door policies and leveraging technology. For instance, setting up a digital platform for residents of a particular Ward to submit their complaints and suggestions can make governance more inclusive and responsive.

These are the areas in which Nigerians have felt void since the return of democracy.

Another instrument of connectivity between the people and their representatives in Government that is still elusive is Transparency and accountability. These are non-negotiable elements of good governance. Without them, the gap between Leaders and the Led widens, breeding corruption and disenfranchisement. Leaders must be transparent about how resources are allocated and decisions are made. Regular updates and community reports can help keep the people informed and involved.

Thomas Jefferson once remarked, "When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." This perspective underscores the need for leaders to be accountable to the people they serve. Establishing mechanisms for feedback and oversight, such as Independent Advisory Committee or Community audits, ensures that leaders remain answerable to their constituents.

Education and empowerment are vital tools for bridging this yawning gap. An informed electorate is more likely to hold leaders accountable and actively participate in governance. Political office holders should invest in civic education programs, teaching residents about their rights and responsibilities in a democratic system.

Nelson Mandela encapsulated this idea when he said, "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." By empowering the people with knowledge, leaders create a partnership where governance becomes a shared responsibility rather than a top-down imposition.

Endearing oneself to ones Constituents also requires fostering collaboration between one and the community. Leadership should not be a one-way street but a partnership where ideas flow freely, and solutions are co-created. This is particularly important in a diverse Community like my Ward — Garki in FCT, where inclusive decision-making can address the needs of all groups.

In the words of Helen Keller: "Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much." Leaders should actively engage community-based organizations, religious groups, and youth associations to ensure that governance reflects the collective will of the people.

Finally, closing the gap between our Leaders and our people is a journey, not a destination. It requires continuous effort, sincerity, and a commitment to serve. As noted above, for diverse and dynamic Communities like Abuja, Area Councils this means embodying the principles of empathy, accessibility, accountability, education, and collaboration. Leadership is not about titles or positions; it is about making a difference in the lives of others.

Lao Tzu, put it more succinctly: "A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves." We must urgently envision a future where the gap between leaders and the people is not just bridged but transformed into a bond of mutual respect and shared purpose, in a 21st century Nigeria.

© Dr. Okechukwu Chuks Ironkwe (Dan Maliki Takunshara), a Community Leader writes from Garki Abuja and can be reached 

 

 

 

I knew Peter Obi in the university, although we were in different faculties. He came from a rich family, drove a new Peugeot car and always turned out like a ‘bourgeoisie’ as we mockingly referred to kids from privileged backgrounds. The civil war had ended a few years earlier and there were scars of the fight on the walls of some buildings in the campus. Alexandra Building, where we had our General Studies, stood with blown out roof and darkened walls. Many of the students, like my roommate in the first year, were former Biafran soldiers, while others came from very humble backgrounds. The emotional toll of the war was still evident in their young lives. In this crowd, Obi and other few fortunate students who were born into wealth easily stood out. Since his graduation in 1983, Peter Obi has gone on to achieve a lot: he’s made a lot of money from importation of foods and drinks; became a bank owner (or part owner, to be precise); won election as governor and recently contested the presidential election. But what strikes me most in his trajectory is his gradual transformation into Nigeria’s main opposition leader since he lost the election eleven months ago. Can he stay the course and is he ready for the bruises that come with such struggles? Frankly, I am worried for Mr. Obi.

Last week, Obi addressed an early morning press conference in which he spoke about the challenges of the Nigerian economy; the deprivations of the Nigerian people and his avowed commitment to continue to speak on these and other governance issues. He challenged President Tinubu to bring down the costs of governance; travel across the country by road and visit a public hospital for his routine medical examinations just to experience what ordinary people are suffering. He concluded his remarks rather ominously: ‘’It is difficult to be in opposition in this country – extremely difficult because everything is against you. Your businesses and everything you’re involved in is being dismantled. What I have faced, what I go through; what my family goes through; you won’t even believe I could still be standing and going around this country. I see colleagues at the airport, and greet them. But they don’t even want to reply because they don’t want the government of the day to see them talking to you’’. He added, in a deadpan voice: ‘’for me, I have decided that I will continue to stand by the Nigerian people and if this is the end, so be it’’.

These are typically words associated with fiery, radical and left-leaning labour leaders or opposition figures under dictatorships, but coming from a member of the propertied class, it’s quite perplexing. The elite class has been so unconcerned with the Nigerian conditions that they’ve never contemplated its end. They have answers to every problem. For poor roads, they buy cyber trucks; for poor electricity, they acquire generators and inverters; for kidnappers on the highways, they fly commercial or private and for noisome street urchins, they are protected by the police, who also carry their wives’ handbags and umbrellas. Obi can afford all these, but since has chosen to stand by the downtrodden; he should be told of the dangers that lurk ahead. Is he ready for the bruises? Africa is replete with many opposition leaders, freedom fighters and activits who have faced grave dangers for their convictions.

In the Second Republic, Chief Obafemi Awolowo easily emerged as the main opposition leader, having lost the two presidential elections in 1979 and 1983. He was backed up by the other presidential also-rans: Dr. NnamDi Azikiwe; Alhaji Waziri Ibrahim; Mallam Aminu Kano and Mr. Tunji Braithwaite, and together, they created a redoubtable hostility to the administration of Shehu Shagari. The young Sokoto prince was under constant barrage of criticisms from these old men for all of the four years he was in office. I pitied him sometimes. But to his credit, Shagari never for once took any unconstitutional action against any of them. Even when Braithwaite’s son was arrested by the police for possession of hemp, the authorities remained nice and polite to the firebrand lawyer. It was in 1985, during the regime of Gen. Buhari who toppled Shagari in a coup, that Chief Awolowo was harassed. His Apapa home was ransacked and his passport seized.

In 1993, Chief MKO Abiola, a wealthy businessman, emerged as a formidable opposition figure after the military had annulled the presidential election of that year which he won. Abiola put up a commendable fight to reclaim his mandate, but unfortunately, a large section of the political class, led by the very person who was his running mate in that election, Babagana Kingibe, was not ready for the struggle. I will recommend the book, ‘’The Struggle for June 12’’, by Frank Kokori for a good account of what it takes to be in opposition. Unfortunately, Abiola lost his life in that struggle. In the Fourth Republic, another rich businessman, Bola Ahmed Tinubu emerged, first as the leader of one of the opposition parties, and later as main opposition figure. In January 2012, Tinubu led massive protests in Lagos and other South West States against President Goodluck Jonathan’s decision to eliminate fuel subsidies. Weakened and embarrassed, Jonathan backtracked. Tinubu and his tribe (I don’t mean ethnic identity) continued to pummel Jonathan, calling him names and attacking his person till he lost the presidential election three years later. To his credit, Jonathan never ordered the arrest of Tinubu or plotted harm against him. But is it poetic justice that another section of the country is rising against Tinubu’s major policy reforms?

 There was no clear opposition leader throughout the eight years of President Buhari. In fact, Atiku Abubarkar who was expected to play that role had retreated into his cocoon in Dubai soon after the 2015 elections. Obi’s emergence as the new opposition leader therefore is essentially filling a void left by Atiku. But will the Tinubu administration tolerant and accommodating? Although Obi is already hinting that his businesses and family are affected, he should bear in mind that the road ahead could be very rough. In a continent rife with human rights abuses, being in opposition is no walk in the park. Kenyan opposition leader, Raila Amolo Odinga was a visible opposition figure in the continent for a long time. In 1982, President Arap Moi threw him into detention for six years. Zimbawe’s Morgan Tsvangirai was routinely beaten during the regime of Robert Mugabe until he nearly lost an eye several years ago. South Africa’s Julius Malema has been charged with hate speech and expelled from ANC. Kizza Besigye of Uganda has suffered untold torture in the hands of strongman Yoweri Museveni. He has been subjected to numerous house arrests and made to face treason charges.

As Peter Obi enters the new phase of his life, I pray for his life and wellbeing and I hope that he, unlike Awolowo; Azikiwe; Kano; Waziri and MKO Abiola, will live to see a Nigeria of his dream.

December 8, 2024: Professor Nuhu Yaqub was with us in Abuja, in the company of great minds—Jibrin Ibrahim, Yakubu Ochefu, Chris Ogbogbo, Aisha Maikudi, Chido Onuma, Tunji Olaopa, Paul and Paula Edeh, Adagio, Okello Oculi, John Odah and many more. We did a mini-seminar on Jibrin Ibrahim. I invited Nuhu Yaqub to speak, and he gave a great speech, starting with his introduction to Marxism. Days after, we spoke twice on the phone. An active and healthy man was gone within three days of sickness, leaving us and the world on Saturday, January 4. I was hit by his departure with an emotional anguish that is taking a longer time to heal.

I have known him for decades. As the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Abuja, he invited me twice to give two Keynote Addresses. As the pioneer Vice-Chancellor of Sokoto State University, he and Professor Malami Buba, his Deputy, invited me to give the University’s first Distinguished Lecture. We exchanged family visits in Austin and Abuja. A candid man, he did not require efforts for him to stay in mind on all aspects of national issues.

The phenomenon of death remains one mystery that humans, and maybe all living creatures, may not understand for its strange nature. At the superficial level, death signifies the finitude to everything living, and it is in this category of interpretation that we humans lurk ourselves, not because we are sometimes not inclined to see beyond the anguish that is brought when we lose people who are dear to us, but because the human mind is not conditioned to process the shock, the urgency, and the forever delinking which occurs when we lose individuals or cherished pets.

Death is a leveller, for it takes the lives of everything without concerns about the irreparable damage that it does to the people behind it. Losing a giant intellectual and humanitarian energy such as Professor Yaqub has dug yet another deep hole in our national heart and left a hollow space that may be difficult to fill. We feel this way because we consider his demise not as a transition into another phase of human existence, which it originally signifies, but as a finitude to the material importance for which the man is known to his immediate family, academic family and national brotherhood.

To say that I am overwhelmed is to mildly describe my emotional state at the breaking of the news that the selfless individual has passed on. It is such a case for me because, in academic brotherhood, it is not only difficult to come across people genuinely committed to a lifelong philosophy, but it is almost impossible to come across individuals who have the mental energy or the political goodwill to effect changes when they could walk their talk.

But then I am only consoled by the understanding that although Professor Yaqub’s transition might have done unprintable damage to our emotional health because of the various shared ideas, values and virtues, his passing on has foregrounded the irreplaceable importance of committing oneself to a meaningful philosophy. It is on this basis that I highlight the exceptional contributions that this individual made to the human world before his transition.

As a political scientist, it has been established that Nuhu Yaqub devoted his intellectual ambition towards the actualization of better national conditions by facilitating a radical evolution of Nigeria’s political system in ways that address its specific and unique peculiarities. Aware of its diversity, the outstanding Professor had campaigned for inclusive leadership to be embraced by the political players in the country in the spirit of creating a haven for the citizens and forging a country that is capable of answering to the wishes and aspirations of everyone.

To become a national hero in my book, what matters is to demonstrate some consistency in one’s philosophical conviction as long as it does not endanger the human family. I can say confidently that this man was not only consistent about his conviction but also invested in it in every sense. I remember clearly how he staunchly argued and equally supported courses of action that would see to the rapid departure from the colonially imposed political culture in exchange for one that would fix the country and free people from the shackles of ideological suppression.

Unlike many other academics, Yaqub was very practical with his solutions, especially because he understood that the possibility of achieving greatness lies especially in the ability to be deliberate and disciplined. Perhaps this would explain why he irrevocably supported the idea of clinical scholarship, research, and intellectual engagements that would lead to the enthronement of an academic culture that is both vibrant and resilient. He has never refused to educate anyone who cares to listen that research engagement is at the centre of Nigeria’s and Africa’s political transformation, revealing why it is dangerous to compromise on such a commitment.

Would it not be surprising that such a man was foresighted in his examination of our basic sociological and sociopolitical fate, so much so that he campaigned that education was a necessity for everyone if the country would evolve to become a force in the global society? He was motivated to say this because he understood the underlying potential that is lurking in the human and natural resources that the country is blessed with. To become an important force in the world, people have always been required to evaluate events from an impartial angle, and that can only be possible on the occasion that people are given a solid education. It is understandable because many issues that are causing problems in the country are founded on the beliefs that are imposed by individuals who constantly take away the right to education of their citizens.

You would begin to understand and not underestimate his position when you appreciate the place of education in the formulation of policies that are needed for the transformation of a country. I have held numerous dialogues with him, and at every opportunity, no matter how little, he would strike up conversations about national issues that are pivotal to the country’s civilizational advancement. In any case, what dominates such conversations is that education is needed in policy formulation because it is through policies that humans transfer their refined ideas to organized guidelines to be used in guiding the decisions of the government to achieve great outcomes. If people are uneducated, there is a possibility that they will be micromanaged by others who have that advantage. This is the fear of the righteous man who committed to such a just course. He has maintained over time that when people are intellectually refined enough to contribute to the debate of welfare improvement, especially as it relates to them, they would, therefore, be encouraged to participate in the affairs of the country if they are given the fair atmosphere where they can thrive without any external threat.

Away from the strictly professional life that this successful man lived, it would be strange that people of his educational and administrative stature still maintained a life of humility and embrace, as he did not consider himself as being superior to people on account of his giant strides in life. Evidence of his selflessness and humility abounds as people with whom he shared one thing or the other have attested to how he opened his space to anyone who wants to experience it.

For a man who was erstwhile Vice Chancellor of the University of Abuja, the information about how to manage opposing opinions to drive the monumental changes that are recorded in the academic institution today cannot cease to amaze people. More than anything, they are indicators that he was professionally inclined and discharged his very responsibility with a great sense of commitment and demeanour. It cannot be overemphasized how his simple nature infected many of the people who have come across the man in different spheres of existence. I cannot stress enough how his sudden demise has brought some hard reality that is difficult to swallow.

How else can we describe the individual as great, especially in the course of academic liberation, if not through a series of great initiatives he made to improve the conditions of things? It was under him as a Vice Chancellor that the University moved out from their temporary site to the permanent one, which required a great deal of sacrifice from members of staff, and he championed it. Not minding the personal and professional costs that this demanded, Professor Yaqub became an important figure in shaping the university. It is no coincidence that his death has sparked a national reflection as people who have either benefited from the largesse of his professional responsibilities or those who had personal relationships with him continue to reveal how his demise has become a national melancholy.

It is understandable for them to feel this way. I have become so engrossed in his scholarly interests and contributions that his sudden departure to the great beyond has dug a hole in my heart.

اللَّهُمَّ اغْفِرْ لَهُ وَارْحَمْهُ وَأَدْخِلْهُ فِي جَنَّتِكَ

Allahummaghfir lahu warhamhu wa adkhilhu fee jannatika.

Translation: O Allah, forgive him, have mercy on him, and admit him into Your Paradise.

Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, has recently been embroiled in political disputes, frequently invoking President Bola Tinubu’s name in his conflicts with political opponents. Wike accused former Rivers State Governor Peter Odili of encouraging Governor Siminalayi Fubara to disobey Tinubu, blaming Odili for the breakdown of a peace agreement brokered by Tinubu in 2023. The peace deal was aimed at resolving political tensions in Rivers State but fell apart, with Wike claiming that Odili influenced Fubara against the President’s directives.

The rift between Wike and Fubara has grown over time, with Wike alleging that he has been wrongly accused of attempting to convert Rivers State into his personal estate. Wike defended his legacy, stating that his administration transformed Rivers State into a medical hub for the South-South region and emphasized that he remains the best governor the state has ever had. He accused Odili of misleading people for personal interests and stated that he would not apologize for his comments.

Wike’s habit of bringing Tinubu into his political battles has become a recurring and concerning pattern. He often invokes the President’s name to justify his actions, claiming loyalty to Tinubu as a shield for his political maneuverings. Wike openly admitted to working against the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) during the 2023 elections, opposing the party’s presidential candidate, to support Tinubu. While Wike argued that his decision was driven by the need to support a Southern president, the reality is that this rationale has since been overshadowed by his ongoing personal vendettas. Wike, wait for the next election to test your political relevance. Leave Tinubu out of your pains, grievances, and self-inflicted fights. Instead, he continues to seek validation through relentless, and often petty, political confrontations. His actions suggest a deeper issue—an inability to let go and accept the reality of governance shifting away from his influence in Rivers State especially.

 

Wike’s confrontations extend beyond his conflict with Governor Fubara. He is also fighting some governors who support Fubara, a female senator representing the FCT, prominent PDP stakeholders, and respected elders in his state. Wike has been known to oppose anyone who tells him he cannot control everything. His persistent attempts to maintain control over Fubara, even after leaving office as governor, reflect his desire to wield influence indefinitely. Despite his departure from office, Wike continues to assert dominance, often bringing Tinubu’s name into his disputes.

For far too long, public perception has been that Wike was using the police and the judiciary to fight Governor Fubara. However, as of today, both institutions have decided to follow the rule of law, shifting the balance of power in the ongoing conflict. This development highlights the importance of adhering to lawful processes in resolving political disputes.

As a psychologist, I cannot diagnose Wike without a formal assessment, but from media observations, he appears to be a man who is angry, jealous, and possibly obsessed. His actions raise significant concerns, as he consistently reacts to Governor Fubara’s movements across Rivers State. Whenever Fubara addresses state matters, celebrates a project, visits an elder, or even attends a church service to thank the people for their ongoing support, Wike follows up with a similar action. He leaves Abuja, where he resides and works, to counter Fubara’s engagements in Rivers State. This disturbing pattern could suggest a deep-seated need for control and validation. It raises the question: what is driving Wike’s behavior? Is he threatened by Fubara’s growing influence or simply unable to relinquish his grip on power in Rivers State? This obsessive pattern cannot be dismissed lightly.

 

What makes this behavior even more alarming is Wike’s tendency to drag President Tinubu into these petty battles. He seems to wield Tinubu’s name as a shield and a weapon in his quest to undermine Fubara. It’s a classic case of using higher authority to mask personal insecurity. Wike fails to see that Tinubu is preoccupied with addressing Nigeria’s pressing challenges—economic recovery, national unity, and infrastructural development. Tinubu does not have time for Wike’s personal vendettas, yet Wike continuously forces the President’s name into irrelevant conflicts, distorting the focus of governance.

Wike’s fixation on undermining Fubara has reached embarrassing levels. Even routine events such as Fubara’s church visits or interactions with local communities seem to provoke a competitive response from Wike. He cannot seem to bear the idea of Fubara receiving praise or support without immediately attempting to overshadow him. It appears Wike cannot tolerate being out of the spotlight for even a moment.

The public has grown weary of these antics. Nigerians are facing serious hardships—rising inflation, unemployment, insecurity, and economic instability. Tinubu is navigating these challenges by working across regions, party lines, and religious divides to foster unity and development. In contrast, Wike’s behavior is self-serving, driven by an inflated ego and a desire to control Rivers State from the shadows. His actions serve no one but himself and are increasingly viewed as a distraction from the real issues affecting ordinary citizens.

 

It is important to note that Tinubu appointed Wike as FCT Minister after reports that Wike helped Tinubu secure electoral victory in Rivers State by any means necessary. However, Nigeria is now grappling with significant economic challenges, and the President is focused on addressing these issues. Tinubu is working tirelessly across regions, party lines, and religious divides to bring about positive change and improve the lives of Nigerians.

Wike’s behavior also reveals a man who is trapped in the past, still viewing governance through the lens of his own tenure. He refuses to accept that Rivers State has moved on under Fubara’s leadership. His inability to relinquish control signifies a deeper problem of entitlement, where he believes that his influence must remain unchallenged. This obsession with power blinds him to the real needs of the people he once governed, reducing his legacy to one of constant disruption and political sabotage.

While Tinubu remains committed to national development, Wike, even in 2025, appears to be more focused on promoting his own agenda. His actions are still sentimentally centered around himself, rather than the broader needs of the country. Wike must recognize that Nigeria is dealing with critical issues, and the President is making efforts to unify the nation and foster growth across all sectors and regions. It is imperative for political leaders to support these efforts and move beyond personal interests for the greater good of the country.

 

Wike’s repeated attempts to overshadow Fubara point to a fragile ego that cannot stand seeing others succeed. It’s a classic case of political insecurity, where one man’s inability to relinquish power is threatening the stability of an entire state. Wike needs to understand that leadership is not about perpetual control but about nurturing growth and progress for future generations. His ongoing interference is not only detrimental to Rivers State but also diminishes his standing on the national stage.

While Wike continues to bring Tinubu’s name into his political fights, the President remains focused on national development and promoting progress across all regions of Nigeria. Tinubu recently visited Enugu State, marking his first official trip to the state since assuming office in May 2023. During his visit, he commissioned several key projects initiated by the Governor Peter Mbah-led administration, aimed at improving infrastructure, education, healthcare, and security in the state.

The projects inaugurated by Tinubu included 30 completed smart green schools out of 260 under construction across the state’s wards, as well as 60 fully equipped Type 2 Primary Healthcare Centres. Additionally, he commissioned 90 urban roads in Enugu City, a multi-functional Enugu International Conference Centre, and a state-of-the-art Command and Control Centre to bolster security efforts. The President also launched 150 patrol vehicles fitted with AI-embedded surveillance cameras to enhance security across the state.

 

Tinubu was accompanied by high-profile dignitaries, including Abia State Governor Alex Otti, National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu, Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Benjamin Kalu, and Minister of Works Dave Umahi. However, notable absentees included Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, Anambra State Governor Charles Soludo, and Ebonyi State Governor Francis Nwifiru. It remains unclear if these governors sent representatives to the event.

Tinubu’s commitment to development and national unity is evident through his actions. By commissioning projects across different regions, he is encouraging growth and progress irrespective of regional or political affiliations. His focus remains on addressing Nigeria’s economic challenges and improving the quality of life for its citizens.

It is crucial for Wike to stop using Tinubu’s name as leverage in his political battles. Tinubu has enough pressing national economic issues to address, and his focus should remain on fostering development across the country. Political leaders like Wike should engage in constructive governance and avoid dragging the President into personal conflicts. Tinubu’s actions, such as his visit to Enugu and the commissioning of significant projects, demonstrate his dedication to promoting development in all parts of Nigeria, regardless of regional differences.

 

Wike must understand that governance is about progress, not obsession. His actions are eroding his legacy and sowing seeds of division in Rivers State. It is time for him to step back, accept the reality of Fubara’s leadership, and focus on constructive contributions to national development.

Nigeria needs leaders who can inspire progress and foster cooperation, not distractions driven by personal vendettas. True leadership is about empowering others and recognizing when it is time to let go of the reins of power. It is not about clinging to influence through relentless, petty confrontations. Wike must make a choice: does he want to be remembered as a statesman who contributed to national progress, or as a disruptor who couldn’t let go of personal grudges? The choice is his, and history will judge him accordingly.

As we enter 2025, the message is clear: Nigeria needs healing and forward movement. Wike must leave Tinubu out of his grievances and recognize that the President is focused on addressing the country’s economic challenges. This is not the time for endless battles over personal relevance. It is a time for unity, progress, and a collective effort to move the nation forward. For God’s sake, it’s time to let go of the past and build a better future.

African proverbs often carry timeless wisdom, guiding us through the complexities of life and leadership. One such saying reminds us, “When a child is helped to ascend the hilly road from the river, he gets home and tells his parents that his helper merely held one of his hands, claiming he did the rest.” This proverb cautions against the dangers of ingratitude, which diminishes the collective effort behind any success.

The recent comments by Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and former Governor of Rivers State, bring this proverb to life. Speaking at a civic reception for loyal politicians in Port Harcourt, Wike dismissed claims that he was made governor by others, insisting he fought his way to power. While he acknowledged receiving support, he made it clear that nobody handed him the governorship, contrasting his rise to power with that of his successor, Governor Siminalayi Fubara, whom Wike claims he personally installed.

This article delves into the implications of Wike’s remarks, which reflect a troubling trend of self-aggrandizement in leadership, disregard for gratitude, and a failure to embrace the communal essence of governance.

 

Leadership, especially in a democracy, is rarely a one-man show. It is a collective effort fueled by the support of voters, party structures, allies, and mentors. Wike’s rise to power is no exception. While he may have demonstrated personal grit, it is undeniable that key figures, including former President Goodluck Jonathan, his wife, Patience Jonathan, and Peter Odili, played pivotal roles in his emergence as Rivers State Governor in 2015.

At the time, Rotimi Amaechi, the then-governor, had fallen out with the Jonathans, prompting them to back Wike, who was a trusted ally. Videos circulating on social media even show Patience Jonathan presenting Wike as the preferred successor to Amaechi. These contributions were not mere formalities, they were instrumental to his emergence as the governor of Rivers State at the time. 

By downplaying the roles these figures played, Wike not only rewrites history but also diminishes the value of collective effort in leadership. His statement risks alienating those who contributed to his success, reinforcing the notion that he views governance as a solitary conquest rather than a communal responsibility.

 

The African saying, “The River that forgets its source will dry up,” underscores the consequences of ingratitude. Leaders who fail to acknowledge the contributions of others risk eroding trust and goodwill, which are essential for sustaining leadership. Wike’s remarks come across as dismissive, if not outright ungrateful, towards those who supported him in his political journey.

Acknowledging the contributions of others does not diminish one’s achievements; rather, it enhances credibility and fosters unity. Wike’s failure to do so sends a demoralizing message to his supporters and aspiring leaders, undermining the very essence of democracy.

Wike’s insistence that he fought his way to power, while perhaps partly true, feeds into a broader issue of self-adulation that has no place in democratic leadership. Democracy is built on the principle that leaders are stewards of the people’s trust, not self-made monarchs.

 

When leaders begin to view themselves as the sole architects of their success, it fosters arrogance and a lack of accountability. Such attitudes can alienate allies, discourage collaboration, and ultimately weaken democratic institutions. Wike’s contrasting narrative, asserting that he made himself governor while he made Fubara governor, further complicates matters. It not only trivializes the people’s role in electing leaders but also sets a dangerous precedent for how power is perceived and wielded.

Gratitude is not just an ethical obligation; it is a practical necessity for good leadership. The African proverb, “The one who climbs a good tree is helped by many hands,” reminds us that success is rarely achieved in isolation. Leaders who recognize and honor the contributions of others strengthen their moral authority and foster a culture of respect and collaboration.

Wike’s remarks, if delivered with humility, could have conveyed a different message. Acknowledging that he fought for his political survival while also expressing deep gratitude for the support he received would have painted him as both strong and humble, a rare but powerful combination in leadership.

 

Wike’s statement offers a cautionary tale for aspiring leaders about the dangers of ingratitude and self-aggrandizement. Leadership is not just about achieving power; it is about serving others and building bridges. The African proverb, “A tree does not make a forest,” underscores the importance of collective effort.

Aspiring leaders must learn that acknowledging the roles others play in their journey does not make them weak, rather, it makes them relatable and credible. Gratitude builds trust, strengthens alliances, and inspires the next generation of leaders to embrace humility and service.

As a seasoned politician, Wike has the opportunity to reshape his narrative. Gratitude, even when belated, has the power to mend relationships and rebuild trust. By openly acknowledging the contributions of those who supported him, Wike can demonstrate that he values collaboration and respects the democratic process.

 

Furthermore, as a minister and elder statesman, Wike should strive to be a unifying figure rather than a polarizing one. His current position offers him a platform to mentor aspiring leaders and reinforce the principles of humility, gratitude, and service.

Wike’s assertion that he made himself governor, while perhaps a reflection of his political resilience, misses a critical point about leadership: no one succeeds alone. The African proverb warns us that “The hand that gives is never forgotten.” Leaders who embrace gratitude not only honor their supporters but also lay the groundwork for enduring legacies.

Wike’s comments serve as a reminder of the importance of humility and gratitude in leadership. By acknowledging the collective effort behind his success, he can set a positive example for the next generation and reinforce the democratic values that underpin governance. In the end, true leadership is not about claiming credit but about serving others and celebrating the communal journey that makes success possible.

Economic, social, and political conditions influence healthcare, a reflection of societal advancement. From ancient civilisations to modern nations, the development of healthcare systems has been a testament to societal priorities and quality of  governance. The ability to deliver healthcare services reflects the state’s commitment to its citizens’ welfare and fosters long-term national growth by improving human capital and productivity. A nation’s healthcare infrastructure plays a vital role in shaping economic output, as healthier populations are more likely to contribute effectively to the workforce, innovate, and drive forward a country’s social and economic engine.  

Moreover, healthcare advancements can serve as a unifying factor, bridging gaps in inequality and reinforcing trust in governance. The evolution of healthcare over the centuries reflects the continuous journey of societies striving for better living standards. From rudimentary herbal remedies to sophisticated surgeries and digital health solutions, healthcare advancements mirror human resilience and ingenuity. Societies prioritising health have often experienced more excellent political stability, longer life expectancies, and accelerated economic growth. 

Ancient Egypt stands out as a prime example of a society that understood the importance of healthcare. In Deir el-Medina, a village housing workers was constructing royal tombs, and organised medical care was provided, highlighting the existence of one of the earliest governmental healthcare systems. Egyptian medicine was advanced, incorporating surgical skills, specialisation, and formal training. Physicians such as Imhotep revered as the first recorded physician, set foundational practices for the medical profession. 

Modern parallels can be drawn to nations like Germany and Japan, whose healthcare systems are ranked among the best globally. Germany’s universal healthcare system, dating back to the 1880s under Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, covers over 90% of its population. The German system comprises comprehensive services, including maternity care, preventive medicine, and mental health support. Japan’s focus on preventive care has contributed to one of the highest life expectancy rates in the world, with average life expectancy reaching 84.6 years by 2023. This is primarily attributed to regular health check-ups, early disease detection, and an emphasis on diet and exercise.

Just as Ancient Egypt’s healthcare advancements reflected societal values, modern nations viewed healthcare improvements as essential progress indicators. Healthcare systems today drive societal growth by reducing mortality, enhancing quality of life, and enabling greater productivity and participation. However, a  2022 Lancet report ranking health systems performance using healthcare access and quality placed Nigeria at 142 out of 195 countries, right in the basement. The maternal mortality rate remains high, at 512 deaths per 100,000 live births as of 2023, the third highest globally. Only 39% of children were fully immunised, compared to the global average of 85, reflecting systemic challenges in healthcare delivery. High out-of-pocket expenses, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a shortage of medical personnel contributed to these statistics. However, countries like South Africa have an immunisation coverage rate of 82%, and Rwanda boasts a 95% immunisation rate, showcasing the potential for improvement through targeted healthcare policies and community engagement programs.

At the start of 2024, there was a palpable sense that healthcare was returning as a national priority in Nigeria. This renewed focus came after the appointment of Professor Muhammad Ali Pate as Coordinating Minister of Health in 2023. Last year witnessed a pivotal change in Nigeria’s health sector. Public intellectuals must objectively criticise government policies and officials because that forms the basis for improvement and growth. This critique often highlights areas of concern and challenges and calls for action by government officials and institutions responsible for them. However, recognising achievements and encouraging and praising where necessary are essential. Recognising achievements in the health sector boosts public morale, reinforces trust, and fosters innovation.

Under Professor Pate’s leadership, the Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative (NHSRII) was introduced to overhaul the health sector by addressing systemic issues and driving sustainable improvements. The initiative is anchored on four critical pillars: strengthening leadership, policy development, and accountability; enhancing infrastructure, training, and healthcare delivery; encouraging private sector investment and local manufacturing; and focusing on preparedness and response to health emergencies. NHSRII aims to reduce healthcare inequalities, promote gender equity in access to services, and ensure the sustainability of health reforms.

NHSRII is implemented through a Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp), which ensures coordinated action across all levels of government, aligns donor efforts with national policies, and fosters collaboration among stakeholders to drive meaningful progress. This integrated approach draws inspiration from successful models in countries like Ghana and Tanzania, where SWAp has been used to streamline donor funding and align development assistance with national healthcare strategies.

One of the most notable achievements in the past year in the health sector is the reduction in under-five mortality by 16.7%. This decline, from 132 per 1,000 live births in 2018 to 110 per 1,000 live births in 2023, marks significant progress in child health. The reduction highlights improvements in prenatal care, better nutrition programmes, and expanded vaccination campaigns. This significant reduction in under-five mortality should reassure the audience about the effectiveness and progress of the Healthcare system, instilling a sense of confidence and trust.

In 2024, Nigeria achieved a milestone in HPV vaccination, with 12.3 million girls aged 9-14 years vaccinated across all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), representing 96% of the target population. This achievement is the highest global coverage for HPV vaccination, providing a critical defence against cervical cancer. Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths among Nigerian women, making this effort pivotal in reducing long-term mortality rates. The initiative also underscores the importance of community engagement, school-based vaccination programs, and public awareness campaigns. By involving the community, these initiatives make every individual feel integral to the process, fostering a sense of involvement and responsibility.

In November 2024, Nigeria launched a malaria vaccine pilot program in Bayelsa and Kebbi states. Currently, 41,145 children have been vaccinated, reflecting the government’s commitment to addressing endemic diseases. Malaria accounts for 23% of child mortality in Nigeria, and the successful pilot paves the way for nationwide expansion, potentially saving thousands of lives annually.

Health insurance expansion is another critical area of progress. By 2024, all states had functional State Health Insurance Agencies (SSHIAs). Over NGN 12 billion has been disbursed, covering 1.7 million lives. The National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) surpassed its 2024 target by enrolling 2 million Nigerians, representing a 14% increase from the previous year. Currently, 19.4 million individuals are insured, marking an essential step towards universal health coverage and reducing the financial burden of healthcare.

The healthcare sector is experiencing increased investment, with 74 pipeline companies actively discussing 22 significant projects. Most initiatives involve foreign manufacturers deploying funding to establish or support local manufacturing operations in Nigeria. This effort, amounting to over $2 billion, highlights the importance of regulatory support and market-shaping strategies. 

Human resources for health have also been prioritised, with 53,732 health workers retrained across 32 states, contributing to improved service delivery. This retraining programme equips frontline health workers with updated maternal and child health skills, disease prevention, and emergency response. The curriculum integrates the latest medical advancements and emphasises hands-on training, ensuring healthcare workers are prepared to manage various health conditions. This investment in human capital is expected to enhance healthcare outcomes, reduce medical errors, and increase patient satisfaction. 

One of the critical challenges facing Nigeria’s healthcare system is workforce migration. The exodus of skilled healthcare professionals seeking better opportunities abroad has led to a shortage of qualified personnel, straining the capacity of health facilities across the country. The National Policy on Health Workforce Migration was introduced in August 2024 to address this. This policy focuses on improving working conditions, offering better incentives, and providing career development opportunities to retain healthcare professionals. Salary increments, improved job security, and enhanced welfare packages are among the measures implemented to curb migration. Additionally, the initiative seeks to attract Nigerian healthcare workers from the diaspora, encouraging them to return and contribute to the local system by providing reintegration programs, competitive salaries, and grants for healthcare entrepreneurship.

Despite the  modest progress, Nigeria faces budgetary constraints that threaten the sustainability of these reforms. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s proposed 2025 budget allocates only 5.18% (2.48 trillion naira) to healthcare, falling short of the 15% target set by the Abuja Declaration. This underscores the need for more effective use of available resources. The Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) will be instrumental in ensuring that limited funds are maximised. By aligning donor contributions with national policies and creating a unified framework, Nigeria can enhance the efficiency and impact of health spending. Increasing domestic investment, fostering public-private partnerships, and expanding tax revenue allocated to healthcare will be crucial for sustaining progress and driving economic growth.

In conclusion, Nigeria’s renewed focus on healthcare signals a critical turning point in the nation’s development. The progress achieved through initiatives like NHSRII, immunisation programmes , and workforce retention strategies reflects a broader commitment to improving public health. Recognising achievements in the health sector energises the sector. By celebrating milestones and addressing challenges proactively, Nigeria can build a resilient healthcare system capable of meeting future needs and improving overall societal well-being. Sustained investment, collaboration, and accountability will be essential in ensuring the longevity and impact of these reforms.

The Left Movement in Nigeria gained two of its best known leaders in 1973. Edwin ‘Eddie’ Ikechukwu Madunagu was a 27-year-old postgraduate student of Mathematics, specifically Differential Equations and Functions of a Complex Variable. He was in the University of Lagos, UNILAG, and had joined the Nigerian Youth Action Committee, NYAC.

In UNILAG, that same year, he met a 26-year-old postgraduate student of Botany, Benedicta ‘Bene’ Michael Afangide and immediately drew her into the movement. The following year, they were with the Society for Progress, a radical youth organisation led by high school teacher, Olu Adebayo.

That same 1974, Bene and Eddie were with the Anti-Poverty Movement of Nigeria, APMON. It was the period of the Public Service Review Commission headed by Jerome Udoji, hence it became known as Udoji Award. APMON got information that, under it, the military regime led by General Yakubu Jack Gowon had approved humongous salary increases for members of the armed forces. It published the new military salary, and members of APMON, including Eddie, were in January 1975, clamped into detention without trial. Students in campuses across the country went on nationwide demonstrations to protest Eddie’s arrest and demanded that the regime stepped down. One of the student leaders, Najeem Jimoh, wrote that: “The mobilisation of the leadership of the student unions nationwide to join our cause was easy because the couple (Bene and Eddie) had always identified with us students…Bene was the great inspiration of our efforts.” Eddie was released in the fifth month and reinstated to his UNILAG teaching job.

 
 

In 1976, they joined the Revolutionary Movement for the Liberation of Nigeria, REMLON. This was also the year they got married and undertook one of the most dangerous tasks in their lives: a plot to overthrow the Nigerian state. For this, Eddie resigned from UNILAG and went underground with others. As they planned an armed struggle to carry out a socialist revolution, the revolutionaries were embedded amongst the peasantry in Ode-Omu, now in Osun State. Eddie, to the peasants, was an Ijesha man. You can imagine their reaction when they later found out that he was not even Yoruba.

 While being part of the plan for an insurrection, Bene, that year, transferred her services from UNILAG to the University of Calabar, UNICAL. When the insurrection plan fell through, Eddie joined Bene in UNICAL. That 1977, they jointly founded a revolutionary students movement on campus called the Movement for Progressive Nigeria, MPN. One of their protégées, a then 21-year-old student, Offiong Offiong Aqua, emerged the pioneer President of the UNICAL Students Union.

In the April 1978 ‘Ali-Must-Go’ national students protests against the commercialisation of tertiary education, Aqua was fingered as one of the five ring leaders. He was detained without trial for months and expelled. Bene and Eddie were identified as the mentors of Aqua and providing inspiration for the protests. They were both dismissed from their jobs along with nine other lecturers and administrators in other tertiary institutions. Also dismissed was Bassey Ekpo Bassey, Editor of ‘Chronicle Newspapers’ and a close comrade of Bene and Eddie in Calabar.

It must have been quite tasking for a couple with Ph.Ds to be out of work and be unemployable for three years because the state so dictated.

In 1981, the year they were reinstated, Bene and Eddie participated in founding the National Democratic Movement Against Fascism, NDM, to tackle the growing fascism under the Shehu Shagari government. That administration had fallen on campuses like a hurricane, sweeping dozens of student leaders out of schools like the Bayero University, BUK, and the Ahmadu Bello University, ABU, while also smashing the leadership of the newly established National Association of Nigerian Students, NANS.

It was part of the efforts to stem this tide and resuscitate the NANS that led the radical national student movement, the Patriotic Youth Movement of Nigeria, PYMN, to send a two-person delegation round some campuses. Comprising then University of Ife Technology student, Femi Fatonode and I, our mission to UNICAL was to meet Bene and Eddie and ask them to link us with members of the MPN. It was on that mission we established contacts with the MPN leader, Kayode Komolafe, known on campus as Komo. Subsequently, the MPN sent two of their cadres, Chris Mammah and Eddie Igharo to the 1981 NANS Convention in the University of Benin, and they emerged respectively as the President and Secretary General of NANS. Those protégées of Bene and Eddie established the radical foundations of NANS which sustained the student movement through the Shagari administration and the brutal military regimes of Buhari, Babangida and Abacha.

The Marxism of Bene and Eddie is centred on social justice, humanism, freedom, internationalism and anti-sexism. In 1981, fierce debates on the rights of the woman boiled over in ABU leading to a national conference in that university from May 27-28, 1982. Two of the papers accepted at that heated conference were by Bene and Eddie. They made a joint presentation on “Conceptual Framework and Methodology: Marxism and the Question of Women’s Liberation.” They posited that the oppression of the woman in the nuclei family is located, first in her role as housewife performing socially necessary, but unpaid, labour. Secondly, as a mother, in which her role “as child bearer is exploited to perpetuate her social inequality with men.”

A socialist revolution, they argued, would not necessarily lead to women emancipation, so women liberation must be integrated into the struggle for socialism.

In a separate paper: “Contemporary Positions and Experiences of Women”, Bene argued that women oppression is in addition to the oppression of the mass, and neither can be liberated without the other. One salutary outcome of that conference was the establishment of a radical women movement called the Women In Nigeria, WIN. In a joint 1986 paper with great women champion, Altine Mohammed, Bene theorised that the strength of WIN is in straddling the class and gender fields, and accepting both males and females as members.

Bene with Grace Osakue in 1993, founded the Girls’ Power Initiative, GPI. Ten years later, she became the General Coordinator of the Development Alternatives With Women for a New Era, DAWN, a network of women from the global South working for democracy, gender and economic justice.

On April 30, 2021, Bene and Eddie ahead of the latter’s 75th birthday on May 15, jointly renewed their vows to socialist revolution in Nigeria and worldwide, and transferred their combined archives to the Nigerian Left.

On November 26, 2024, Bene joined the pantheon of international revolutionaries. The Left, her family and other lovers of humanity will gather in Calabar on Friday, January 17, 2025 to give Bene a final Red Salute.

 

Nigeria’s telecoms industry, and the digital economy that has developed around it, are at a fundamental inflection point. The decisions that we make now will determine whether the growth and development of our digital economy continues on a sustainable trajectory, or whether the connectivity infrastructure that drives it begins to degrade.

The scope, breadth and sophistication of Nigeria’s telecoms industry today is a shining example of what can happen when a country combines the right policy and regulatory environment, with the right market opportunity. Since the first call was made in 2001, Nigeria’s telecoms sector has evolved into one of the largest and most sophisticated in the world, meeting the growing needs of Nigerian consumers and employing millions of people. Today, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) statistics show that there are now more than 157 million active connections, and that number is growing every month.

As the telecoms industry has expanded connectivity, it has enabled the emergence and rapid growth of the digital economy. In 2024, ICT contributed nearly 20% to Nigeria’s GDP, more than twice the contribution of oil and gas, and it continues to grow. As Nigeria transitions to the non-oil based economy that will enable more inclusive growth, connectivity is becoming more and more important. It is the foundation on which our future economy will be built. Whether it is your digital banking solution, social media and marketing, your mobile-based agricultural extension services, your e-government portal or the telemedicine and edtech solutions that are enabling broader access to healthcare and education, the impact of improved connectivity is universal.

That is why we must act now to ensure that we have a sustainable platform for the connectivity needs of the future. The NCC and the Federal Government are quite rightly-focused on ensuring Nigerians have the service levels that they deserve, but they also recognise that the industry needs the help and support of the government. The administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and the ministry of digital economy and communications under the able minister, Bosun Tijani, should be commended for their recognition of the need to support the industry, and the actions that they have taken to do so. For instance, legislation like the critical national infrastructure bill is vital to the maintenance of service quality levels, and systemic debt issues in the sector – both of which have now been comprehensively addressed. These all help establish the foundations for the future.

 

It is also commendable the other generic, giant strides the minister and the government as a collective, are taking to promote the nation’s digital economy. For instance, the ‘Three Million Technical Talents’ (3MTT) programme, which is a critical part of the Renewed Hope Agenda, is aimed at building Nigeria’s technical talent backbone to power our digital economy and position Nigeria as a net talent exporter. Put this side by side with the same government’s planned 90,000km terrestrial fibre roll-out, it becomes glaring that we now have a more forward-looking policy formulators at the helm of affairs. When completed, the fibre optics network will move the nation’s capacity from 35,000 to 125,000, making it one of the longest in Africa.

Ensuring service quality and reliability is at the heart of our mission as telecom operators, but achieving this requires a delicate balance between the cost of a product, and the investment that is made to maintain or enhance it.

Over the last decade, the tariffs that you pay for telecom services have not changed, yet over that time, operating expenses in the sector have increased by more than 300%. That equation is simply unsustainable for any industry, but even more so for a capital-intensive sector like telecoms. If you look closely at the financials of a telecoms company you will see that in order to maintain standards, delivery service quality and invest in new technology operators have to make continued and significant capital investments. The simple reality for our industry is that investment drives growth. If costs exceed revenue generation, then it becomes questionable whether the funds that need to be reinvested into the network every year will continue to be available. When that happens, growth stops and the service quality that our customers rely on suffers.

 

The consequences of this would go far beyond the telecoms industry. The digital services that we have all become reliant on could begin to suffer. Millions of jobs would be lost and Nigeria’s economic development would be set back by decades. This is not just a threat to our company and our industry. It is a threat to the nation, and every one of its citizens.

At the same time, the industry and the government recognise that Nigerian consumers have faced a range of significant cost of living challenges over recent years, and the transition to market pricing in the fuel and electricity sectors have driven up prices across the board. We know that we have to find the right balance between the increases that the industry wants, and the prices that Nigerians can afford to pay.

It is also important to assess the cost of Nigeria’s telecoms services compared to our contemporaries in Africa. Recent studies have shown that the average cost of 1GB of data in Nigeria is $0.38. That compares to $0.59 in Kenya, $0.68 in Ethiopia, $1.77 in South Africa and $6 in the USA. Today, Nigeria has some of the cheapest data prices for its citizens anywhere in the world.

The discussions between the industry and government have been deliberate and focused on finding the right balance, while aligning with pricing in other markets. It is why the proposed tariff increases will surely be capped, and definitely much lower than the price increases that have been imposed in other sectors like power/energy and oil; and ensuring that prices remain below our contemporaries. So not only will increases be capped well below the levels the industry has requested, but they are linked to a requirement to invest in network upgrades and service improvements, which will be overseen by the NCC to ensure compliance.

 

This balance of tariff increases, alongside investment commitments means that not only will the telecoms industry have the confidence to invest, and a clear pathway back to sustainability – but the higher prices will lead to better networks, more relevant services and so the better customer experience that enables growth.

Nigeria’s digital economy has shown its potential in the last decade, but the journey we are on to develop and grow it is still in its very early stages. The decision that the government has taken to ensure a sustainable tariff regime is brave, necessary and must be commended. It will ensure that our digital economy can remain on its growth path.

At MTN Nigeria we have demonstrated our long-term commitment to Nigeria many times. We believed when no one else did. We continue to believe, and we are committed to partnering with Nigeria and Nigerians to continue to invest based on that belief.

Dr Karl Toriola is the CEO of MTN Nigeria.

When Rotary started in 1905, it was just an idea and the vision of one man: Paul Percy Harris. The Chicago, Illinois-based attorney formed the Rotary Club of Chicago on February 23, 1905 (the first Rotary Club in the world with his three friends), so that professionals with diverse backgrounds could exchange ideas and form meaningful lifelong friendships. Over time, Rotary’s reach and vision gradually extended to humanitarian service.

By next month, Rotary International would be 120 years old – the fellowship and humanitarian service organisation that you will find in over 200 countries and geographical regions, including some of the world’s most remote locations.

Paul Harris died a long time ago on January 27, 1947 when he was 78 years old. But Rotary – his dream and idea – has continued to thrive and endure and waxing stronger each day with 1.4 million members in over 46,000 Rotary and Rotaract Clubs worldwide.

In 1917, something remarkable happened during the Rotary International Convention in Atlanta, Georgia. It was a life-changing initiative that would ensure that the Rotary vision of serving humanity did not die. It simply means Rotary would be with us forever; the idea would be sustained in perpetuity.

 

Arch Klumph, the sixth President of Rotary International, came up with the idea of setting up an endowment fund at the convention that became known as The Rotary Foundation (TRF) “for the purpose of doing good in the world.” It was previously called the Permanent Fund. That idea, with an initial contribution of US$26.50, “set in motion a powerful force that has transformed millions of lives around the world.”

The mission of The Rotary Foundation is to enable Rotarians to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace by improving health, providing quality education, improving the environment and alleviating poverty.

The Rotary Foundation is the non-profit arm of Rotary International. A Board of Trustees manages the business of the Foundation, led by the trustee chair. The Rotary International president-elect nominates the trustees, who are elected by the Rotary International Board of Directors.

 

The trustee chair serves for one year and trustees serve for four years. One of the trustees is our own Pearl Ijeoma Okoro, a Nigerian, who is currently serving on the board. Ijeoma is a Past District Governor of District 9141, and her tenure as TRF trustee would lapse on June 30, 2028.

The current trustee chair is Mark Daniel Maloney, who was Rotary International President in 2019-20 when the Covid-19 pandemic turned the world upside down. It was during his term that Rotary held its first-ever virtual convention from June 20 – 26, 2020 that was originally planned to be a physical event in Honolulu, Hawaii.

The seed money of US$26.50 has continued to grow and the value this year is expected to reach US$2.025 billion.  All the monies donated to the foundation are invested in various high-yielding ventures like stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. as advised by the trustees for a period of three years.

After three years, the funds – only the interest is touched – become available to be disbursed as grants. The Rotary Foundation offers grants that support humanitarian projects, scholarships, and vocational learning teams. We have: a) district grants, b) global grants, c) disaster response grants and d) program of scale grants.

 

District grants fund smaller-scale, short-term projects that address immediate needs in our communities or abroad; global grants support large international projects with long-term, sustainable outcomes in one or more of Rotary’s areas of focus. They range from US$30,000 to US$400,000.

The disaster response grants support disaster relief and recovery efforts in areas that have been affected by natural disasters through grants from the Rotary Disaster Response Fund, while the program of scale grants benefit a large number of people or a significant geographical area. The grant supports Rotary member-led, evidence-based programs that have already demonstrated success.

The program of scale grant is worth US$2 million and three have been issued to date. The first grant was given to Zambia to fight malaria (Malaria-Free Zambia project); the second grant was given to Nigeria for maternal and child health while the third was given to Egypt for cervical cancer.

Rotarians and non-Rotarians are encouraged to contribute to foundation. The three types of funds available in the foundation are: a) the Annual Program Fund, b) the PolioPlus Fund and c) the Endowment Fund.

 

Under the Endowment Fund, we have the Arch Klumph Society (named after the sixth President of Rotary International) which recognises The Rotary Foundation’s highest tier donors – those who have contributed US$250,000 or more during their lifetime. Some Nigerian Rotarians are Arch Klumph Society members.

Under this fund, we also have Bequest Society members (those who make a commitment for future gifts of US$10,000 or more to the fund that is redeemed after their death), and Benefactors (those who contribute US$1,000 or more to the fund outright, or when they include the fund as a beneficiary of US$1,000 or more in their estate plans).

 

Now, let’s talk about Polio and the fund being used for the eradication of the wild-polio virus. “Polio, or poliomyelitis,” according to a statement on Rotary International’s website, “is a paralysing and potentially deadly disease that most commonly affect children under the age of five. The virus spreads from person to person, typically through contaminated water. It can attack the nervous system.

“Rotary has been working to eradicate polio for more than 35 years. As a founding partner of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), Rotary’s commitment has seen polio cases reduced by 99.9 per cent since the first project to vaccinate children in the Philippines in 1979.

 

“Rotary members have contributed US$2.1 billion and countless volunteer hours to protect nearly three billion children in 122 countries from this paralysing disease. Rotary advocacy efforts have played a role in decisions by governments to contribute more than US$10 billion to the effort.”

Today, polio remains endemic only in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “Until the polio virus transmission is interrupted in these two countries,” says GPEI, “all countries remain at risk of importation of polio, especially vulnerable countries with weak public health and immunization services and travel or trade links to endemic countries.”

 

Nigeria used to be listed alongside Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and Nigeria (PAIN, what an acronym!) as the remaining countries in the world where the polio virus was endemic. However, Nigeria was certified polio-free on August 24, 2020 by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Before then, Nigeria’s last case of indigenous wild-polio virus was in 2016, whereas in 2006, Nigeria had the highest number of polio cases in the world.

More than US$300 million was spent by Rotary to kick out the polio virus from Nigeria. Last year, The Rotary Foundation donated another US$14 million to strengthen polio surveillance in the country which was facilitated by the Nigeria National PolioPlus Committee chaired by Past District Governor Joshua Hassan.

The eradication of the wild polio virus was successful because community health workers and volunteer community mobilisers built effective community engagement; regions of high risk were targeted; missed children were tracked, and community-based surveillance and independent monitoring were improved.

However, information on the current status as of December 2022, revealed that there were 168 cases of vaccine-derived variant of polio (a circulating type 2 transmission strain), in the country. To maintain the polio-free status, Nigeria administers over 270 million vaccines each year.

In 2024, Nigeria recorded around 50 polio cases between January and May, despite vaccination campaigns and monitoring efforts. The polio virus that was discovered in Nigeria in 2021 continues to circulate, particularly in high risk areas. This variant often affects communities that are under-immunised, where routine vaccine coverage is low.

Every Rotarian is required to support the PolioPlus Fund by contributing a minimum of US$10, while the contribution by each Rotary Club is US$1,500. Each Rotary District is expected to apply 20 per cent of their District Designated Funds (DDF) to support the fund which is matched with an additional 50 per cent by Rotary’s World Fund.

By the way, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation doubles contributions to the polio fund in the ratio of 2:1 matching grant.

Mark Maloney, the TRF chair and his spouse, Gay, are visiting Nigeria from January 15 – 20, 2025. The couple would be received by Pearl Ijeoma Okoro (member of The Rotary Foundation Board of Trustees) and other Rotary leaders in Abuja.

He is scheduled to meet President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in Aso Villa. Mark Maloney added Tunde to Mark as a mark of his engagements and recognition of his footprints in Nigeria. President Tinubu should call him Marktunde Maloney to confirm is Nigeria-ness and his relationship with Nigerians.

This would not his first visit to Nigeria. I recall that in September 2018, Maloney and Gay were in Nigeria. At that time, Maloney was the President-elect of Rotary International. We posed for photographs at Eko Hotel, in Lagos.

Maloney and Gay are billed to interact with Rotarians in Abuja (District 9126 and District 9127) before flying into Lagos on Saturday January 18, where he would be hosted by District Governors Oluwole Kukoyi and Femi Adenekan of District 9111 and District 9112 respectively.

His itinerary in Lagos includes a press conference, advocacy engagements, visit to the Polio House, funding raiser, symbolic polio immunisation, town hall meeting and gala dinner with Rotarians, partners as well as other stakeholders.

How are you doing good in your community? What are you doing to make a difference in other people’s lives? It is never too late; you can start today. You can become a goodwill ambassador, and you can also decide to join Rotary.

Braimah is a communications strategist and publisher/editor-in-chief of Naija Times (https://ntm.ng) and Lagos Post (https://lagospost.ng). He is also the Chair of Public Image Committee (2024-2025), Rotary International, District 9112, and can be reached at ehi.braimah@neomedia.com.ng.

The Nigeria’s mismanaged goal of penticostalism is evident in its origin, nature and teachings. Of great importance is the stark contradictions in word interpretation and character of some church leaders. Why is penticostalism still driven by religious deceit, greed, envy, jealousy, insatiable want and rebellion just like in the beginning? The origin of penticostalism could be traced to Martin Luther, a German Catholic Priest of the St. Augustinian Order and the most influential progenitor of global protestant reformation ordained in 1507. Even as a priest, his views audaciously differed from the overall teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. This eventually altered the world of Christianity and pitched Luther against the church. According to Wikipedia, “Luther became convinced that the church was corrupt in its ways and had lost sight of what he saw as several of the central truths of Christianity.” Among many challenges he posed to the Roman Catholic Church, “was his interest in the doctrine of justification which is God’s act of declaring a sinner righteous by faith alone through His grace.”  
 
His doctrine challenged the authority and office of the pope by insisting that “the Bible is the only source of heavenly revealed knowledge, and opposed sacerdotalism - religious belief emphasising the powers of priests as essential mediators between God and humankind and deeming all baptised Christians to be a holy priesthood.” Luther insisted that; Christians “must not slacken in following Christ on account of such false assurances.” 
 
His opinion, logic and position though reasonable to some extent angered the Catholic Church which brooks no dissenting views and tendencies contending with her position on any matter. The Catholic Church is a kingdom ruled in line with its age long unique structured tradition and peculiar systems. The church has lived and dealt with convergence of views contrary to what she practices and believes in.  It was unheard of to have such audacity of challenge emanating from within – from an ordained priest. Pope Leo X in 1520, ordered Luther to forsake all of his writings and new beliefs. But Luther refused to comply and in January 1521, he was excommunicated. In response, Luther proclaimed that, “I am bound by the scriptures I have quoted, and my conscience is captive to the word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything since it is neither safe nor right to go against my conscience. May God help me. Amen!” Even with Luther's acclaimed religiosity, his ignoble role in support of Jewish annihilation during Hitler-Nazi led world war I  was an irony of life led by a true Christian or reformist.
 
Luther’s theological experiences and belief system formed the basis of Lutheranism which birthed the proliferation of global penticostalism. The reformer taught his adherents that, “salvation and consequently, eternal life are not earned by good deeds; rather, they are received only as free gift of God’s grace through the believer’s faith in Jesus Christ, who is the sole redeemer from sin.” Almost all the global penticostal churches are known descendants of Lutheranism and since have adopted the above philosophy and approach as their guiding principle. However, instead of remaining one entity in the body of Christ, his followers found the doctrines they earlier believed in wanting and the Lutheran church began to disintegrate. The church as expected continued to transform and introduce reforms which was the idea in the first place by breaking away until we got this penticostal disaster in our hands. The idea assumed rightly to fire up the body of Christ was mismanaged. 
 
The confusion and disparity; the obvious desperation for church transformation created within itself and in the body of Christ will take ages to resolve. Penticostalism could be likened to the tower of Babel. Nobody hears or understands anybody. Cacophony of teachings, varying opinions on the same God and the Holy Bible have made it difficult for the sheep to understand which shepherd is leading the right way especially when all of them claim to be led by the same God and the Holy Spirit. Penticostalism has turned Christianity into a laughing stock and a full business enterprise. The use of psychology of theology to influence followers to act in a certain manner has become the order of the day.  
 
Almost every pastor wants to be seen and heard. They struggle for traditional and social media spaces for attention. Almost if not all pastors now perform miracles and healing to the point of even internally micro-managing some. They have forgotten to identify and utilise that special gifts God gave to each of them. They jump into predictions and prophesies of all ridiculous kinds including miracle money alert, winning of elections and football games. Some pray for con men to hit it big while voodoo chiefs have accused many of patronising them for potency. Tithing which is an old testament advice has been elevated to a high pedestal by many who insist is a way through which none can make heaven. They instill the fear of losing heaven if one does not pay tithe. One key element of penticostalism is that of rebellion. Rebellion begets rebellion and the trend has continued to befall its existence. 
 
Silent envy, jealousy and the love of money is one big problem of penticostalism. How to share proceeds accruable to the church has pitched junior pastor, members and the senior pastors against one another. A man will be serving in a certain church under a pastor only for him to claim hearing or called by God. In some instances the prodigal pastor incites members against his master and depart unceremoniously to establish his. That was why makeshift churches dot almost every street with four members of the pastor’s family singing and clapping in loneliness for God’s miracle and wonders. Why would you leave a church where you have served God for years for another new church to continue worshipping the same unchangeable God of miracles? They will tell you that if your church cannot change you, you should change your church.
 
Many church members have been battling with how to confront deceit on pulpit. Some have been duped of their hard earned resources by their General Overseers. Families and marriages have been broken as a result of pastor’s erroneous counsel. Many members have humbly obeyed the instructions of their pastors to sow a certain painful seed for God to bless them only for them to find out that they were influenced one way or the other when the said blessings never came. Many penticostal pastors who mounts the pulpit have created their own myths, doctrines and teachings referencing the Bible for validation. That was why recently one Abel will say something and another Suleman will disagree. Has God become an author of confusion?  Funds generated through crusades, payment of tithes and other subtle means has created multi-millionaires and azonto pastors. 
Pastors who sell wrist bands, handkerchiefs, soaps, holy water and anointing oils for protection cruise around town in private jets, amoured vehicle including security men wielding AK-47 riffles. 
 
Some were kidnapped and they willingly paid ransom instead of invoking the so called power of protection in their holy wares. The church should always be a shining example, a city built on the hill, and therefore, pastors should practice what they preach. Nigeria with the highest number of churches in Africa is the poverty capital of the world. China without the God of Israel leads in global development indices more than Nigeria said to have over 23, 000 churches according to reports. The former which buys and converts folded industry buildings and warehouses into churches goes cap in hand borrowing from the latter which paid attention to technology, good leadership, discipline and hard work. One had thought that prayers rendered daily in homes and offices; occasions and churches every week, at mid-week services and in crusades would have added value to lives and transformed the nation. However, the nation is rapidly-dangerously retrogressing. Prayer does not compensate for nepotism, laziness, bad leadership and incompetence. The goal of Christianity and penticostalism would only be achieved when Christ is seen to live and reflect in us while the scripture truly becomes our intention and only guiding light.
 
 
Sunday Onyemaechi Eze is a lecturer, Department of Mass Communication, Coal City University, Enugu