The National Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture (NACCIMA) has urged President Bola Tinubu’s administration to prioritise tax reforms, including reducing corporate tax rates to 19% and maintaining Value Added Tax (VAT) at 7.5%.

This was disclosed in a statement signed by Dele Kelvin Oye, the association’s national president. NACCIMA argued that these adjustments would stimulate economic growth and lead to increased tax revenues for the government.

“We believe corporate taxes should be further reduced to 19% and VAT pegged at 7.5%. We believe this will grow the economy and result in higher tax revenues for the government. As a caveat to protect government revenues, each taxpayer must not pay less than the preceding tax year,” the statement read.

The current tax reform bills before the National Assembly propose a gradual increase in VAT rates, starting from 10% in 2025 to 12.5% (2026–2029) and reaching 15% by 2030. NACCIMA has expressed concerns over these plans, suggesting that maintaining the current VAT rate would better serve economic and fiscal stability.

Oye also criticised the public disputes between federal and state governments over revenue sharing, noting that these disagreements often ignore the fundamental interests of taxpayers.

“The current media engagement between federal and state governments in newspaper and press releases only further confirms the disconnect described above,” Oye said. “The beneficiary parties receiving taxpayer funds engage each other on how to secure a larger portion of taxpayer funds without consideration for the public or taxpayer interest.”

Highlighting the contributions of sectors like telecommunications to government revenues, Oye called for targeted reforms to unlock their growth and revenue potential.

“Significant taxpayers like the telecommunications sector, who require reforms that will result in increased tax revenues, should not be ignored,” he said.

NACCIMA also called for meaningful private sector inclusion in tax reform discussions, encompassing aviation, telecommunications, manufacturing, and operators in Free Trade Zones. The association criticized the current approach of relying on committees that merely “lecture taxpayers” without yielding actionable results.

“There must be real dialogue with genuine concessions to be made by all parties. The private sector—aviation, telecommunications, manufacturers, Free Trade Zones, and other stakeholders—must be engaged in written communication. Committees that come to lecture taxpayers are not giving positive outcomes,” the statement added.

NACCIMA suggested forwarding the outcomes of such engagements to the National Assembly through the office of the Attorney General, as directed by the President, for better coordination.

[Businessday]

Governor Makinde disclosed that bandits had already set their camps Fashola area of the state. He, however, assured that his administration would ensure all criminal elements are made to face the law.

He stated this while speaking at 2025 Annual Inter-faith Service for State Workers. The Inter-faith Service was attended by Labour leaders, workers, political appointees, community leaders, members of the judiciary and traditional rulers.

“The year 2024 has been a challenging year, even in terms of safety and security. We had a few fire incidents, armed robberies, and kidnappings, but what I would say is that we will redouble our efforts in 2025. Some of these issues, we will tackle squarely.

“Even just this morning, during the security briefing, we received updates about a special operation currently underway. Quite a number of the wrongdoers from the major northwestern zone are relocating here. But we will locate them, and we will deal with them.

“Because of the stampede last year, I chose to go to Fashola, just to lay low for my birthday, and I can tell you that within less than perhaps one and a half kilometres from where I was sleeping, there were bandits with camps established there,” he said.

The Oyo State Governor commended security agencies for their efforts in fighting crimes and criminality in the state.

While commending traditional rulers and community leaders for their support to his government, Makinde charged them to report every suspicious movement to security agencies and the government.

“So I would like to take this opportunity to thank our service commanders. You have been doing your part, and you have done very well for us in Oyo State. Nothing meaningful can occur in an atmosphere of insecurity. All the laudable things that we wish to achieve will not be possible if we don’t have a safe and secure environment.

“I want to encourage all of us; we come from different locations, we are from various zones, and our traditional rulers, you are the custodians of the environment within your domain. This is no joke; it’s a serious issue, and for us in Oyo State, they will never gain a foothold here. I will not rest until every inch of Oyo State is free of bandits and wrongdoers.

“But you must also do your part. If you see any suspicious movement, please report it to the authorities, and we will take action. It is in our collective interest,” the Governor added.

Recall that Naija News reported that Makinde at the event, also vowed to prosecute people involved in the Ibadan stampede. He said no amount of appeal would make him bow down from following the rule of law.

[NaijaNews]

Airtel Nigeria has added its voice to the industry-wide call for an upward review of tariffs in the telecom sector, saying the costs of operation have gone up by over 300%.

The Chief Executive Officer of the company, Mr. Dinesh Balsingh, who stated this in an op-ed, said the adjustments are critical for maintaining high-quality services and enabling further advancements in Nigeria’s digital transformation journey.

“For over a decade, tariffs have remained static despite the dramatic increase in operating expenses, which have surged by over 300% in the last 18 to 24 months alone.  

“To continue providing high-quality services and meeting the growing demand for digital connectivity, it has become essential to realign our pricing structure with economic realities,” Balsingh said.

The need for more investments 

The Airtel CEO also underscored the significant investments required to maintain and expand telecom infrastructure, which is pivotal to supporting Nigeria’s digital economy.

“The increasing demand for digital services across sectors such as education, banking, and healthcare requires us to continually upgrade our networks to deliver more capacity and improve service quality.  

“These investments come at a cost, one that must be shared proportionally to guarantee long-term viability,” he said.

• The proposed tariff adjustments, Balsingh argued, will not only ensure the sustainability of the telecom sector but also improve service delivery.
• He added that by enabling the telecom operators to expand coverage, strengthen network security, and introduce cutting-edge technologies, the adjustments would directly enhance the quality of connectivity for Nigerians.
• According to him, the telcos’ priority is to ensure that no one is left behind in the country’s digital transformation journey.

What you should know 

Last week, the Chief Executive Officer of MTN Nigeria, Mr. Karl Toriola, said telecom operators in the country had requested an approximately 100% increase to ensure the industry’s sustainability rather than boost short-term profitability.

• Sharing the same sentiment as Airtel’s CEO, Toriola said the telecom industry is now facing a sustainability threat that must be addressed through a tariff review.
• He, however, noted that the telecom regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), may not approve the 100% increase requested.

“We’ve put forward a request of approximately 100% tariff increases to the regulators. I doubt they’re going to approve that quantum of increases because they’re very sensitive to the current economic situation in the country,” he said.

The two telecom industry associations in Nigeria, the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) and The Association of Telecommunication Companies of Nigeria (ATCON) have also been at the forefront of advocacy for tariff review in the industry for over two years, citing increase in costs of operations.

[Nairametrics]

Sam Altman, the chief executive officer (CEO) of OpenAI, says the company is incurring losses on its ChatGPT Pro product.

The product, introduced in late 2024 at a subscription rate of $200 per month, offers users access to the upgraded o1 Pro model and removes usage limits across other OpenAI tools.

However, in a recent post on X, Altman said the plan has been less profitable than anticipated.

“Insane thing: we are currently losing money on openai pro subscriptions! people use it much more than we expected,” he wrote.

Responding to comments, Alman said the pricing was designed to generate profits.

“I personally chose the price and thought we would make some money,” the CEO added.

Despite its valuation of over $80 billion, OpenAI reported a $5 billion loss in 2024 — with revenues reaching $3.7 billion.

On October 2, 2024, the company said it raised $6.6 billion in funding, attracting significant investment from firms like Thrive Capital, Khosla Ventures, Nvidia, and its largest corporate backer, Microsoft.

Since its inception in 2015, OpenAI’s journey has been marked by growth intertwined with controversy.

In November 2023, Altman was abruptly removed as CEO by OpenAI’s board for not being “candid in his communications”.

He was reinstated shortly after the board reached an agreement.

Also, Elon Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who later parted ways with the organisation, has openly criticised its transition to a “for-profit model”.

In December 2024, Musk, who leads his own AI startup, xAI, filed a court injunction against OpenAI.

He claimed the company’s shift betrayed its nonprofit roots, straying from its original mission and creating unfair competition for rivals like xAI.

I knew Peter Obi in the university, although we were in different faculties. He came from a rich family, drove a new Peugeot car and always turned out like a ‘bourgeoisie’ as we mockingly referred to kids from privileged backgrounds. The civil war had ended a few years earlier and there were scars of the fight on the walls of some buildings in the campus. Alexandra Building, where we had our General Studies, stood with blown out roof and darkened walls. Many of the students, like my roommate in the first year, were former Biafran soldiers, while others came from very humble backgrounds. The emotional toll of the war was still evident in their young lives. In this crowd, Obi and other few fortunate students who were born into wealth easily stood out. Since his graduation in 1983, Peter Obi has gone on to achieve a lot: he’s made a lot of money from importation of foods and drinks; became a bank owner (or part owner, to be precise); won election as governor and recently contested the presidential election. But what strikes me most in his trajectory is his gradual transformation into Nigeria’s main opposition leader since he lost the election eleven months ago. Can he stay the course and is he ready for the bruises that come with such struggles? Frankly, I am worried for Mr. Obi.

Last week, Obi addressed an early morning press conference in which he spoke about the challenges of the Nigerian economy; the deprivations of the Nigerian people and his avowed commitment to continue to speak on these and other governance issues. He challenged President Tinubu to bring down the costs of governance; travel across the country by road and visit a public hospital for his routine medical examinations just to experience what ordinary people are suffering. He concluded his remarks rather ominously: ‘’It is difficult to be in opposition in this country – extremely difficult because everything is against you. Your businesses and everything you’re involved in is being dismantled. What I have faced, what I go through; what my family goes through; you won’t even believe I could still be standing and going around this country. I see colleagues at the airport, and greet them. But they don’t even want to reply because they don’t want the government of the day to see them talking to you’’. He added, in a deadpan voice: ‘’for me, I have decided that I will continue to stand by the Nigerian people and if this is the end, so be it’’.

These are typically words associated with fiery, radical and left-leaning labour leaders or opposition figures under dictatorships, but coming from a member of the propertied class, it’s quite perplexing. The elite class has been so unconcerned with the Nigerian conditions that they’ve never contemplated its end. They have answers to every problem. For poor roads, they buy cyber trucks; for poor electricity, they acquire generators and inverters; for kidnappers on the highways, they fly commercial or private and for noisome street urchins, they are protected by the police, who also carry their wives’ handbags and umbrellas. Obi can afford all these, but since has chosen to stand by the downtrodden; he should be told of the dangers that lurk ahead. Is he ready for the bruises? Africa is replete with many opposition leaders, freedom fighters and activits who have faced grave dangers for their convictions.

In the Second Republic, Chief Obafemi Awolowo easily emerged as the main opposition leader, having lost the two presidential elections in 1979 and 1983. He was backed up by the other presidential also-rans: Dr. NnamDi Azikiwe; Alhaji Waziri Ibrahim; Mallam Aminu Kano and Mr. Tunji Braithwaite, and together, they created a redoubtable hostility to the administration of Shehu Shagari. The young Sokoto prince was under constant barrage of criticisms from these old men for all of the four years he was in office. I pitied him sometimes. But to his credit, Shagari never for once took any unconstitutional action against any of them. Even when Braithwaite’s son was arrested by the police for possession of hemp, the authorities remained nice and polite to the firebrand lawyer. It was in 1985, during the regime of Gen. Buhari who toppled Shagari in a coup, that Chief Awolowo was harassed. His Apapa home was ransacked and his passport seized.

In 1993, Chief MKO Abiola, a wealthy businessman, emerged as a formidable opposition figure after the military had annulled the presidential election of that year which he won. Abiola put up a commendable fight to reclaim his mandate, but unfortunately, a large section of the political class, led by the very person who was his running mate in that election, Babagana Kingibe, was not ready for the struggle. I will recommend the book, ‘’The Struggle for June 12’’, by Frank Kokori for a good account of what it takes to be in opposition. Unfortunately, Abiola lost his life in that struggle. In the Fourth Republic, another rich businessman, Bola Ahmed Tinubu emerged, first as the leader of one of the opposition parties, and later as main opposition figure. In January 2012, Tinubu led massive protests in Lagos and other South West States against President Goodluck Jonathan’s decision to eliminate fuel subsidies. Weakened and embarrassed, Jonathan backtracked. Tinubu and his tribe (I don’t mean ethnic identity) continued to pummel Jonathan, calling him names and attacking his person till he lost the presidential election three years later. To his credit, Jonathan never ordered the arrest of Tinubu or plotted harm against him. But is it poetic justice that another section of the country is rising against Tinubu’s major policy reforms?

 There was no clear opposition leader throughout the eight years of President Buhari. In fact, Atiku Abubarkar who was expected to play that role had retreated into his cocoon in Dubai soon after the 2015 elections. Obi’s emergence as the new opposition leader therefore is essentially filling a void left by Atiku. But will the Tinubu administration tolerant and accommodating? Although Obi is already hinting that his businesses and family are affected, he should bear in mind that the road ahead could be very rough. In a continent rife with human rights abuses, being in opposition is no walk in the park. Kenyan opposition leader, Raila Amolo Odinga was a visible opposition figure in the continent for a long time. In 1982, President Arap Moi threw him into detention for six years. Zimbawe’s Morgan Tsvangirai was routinely beaten during the regime of Robert Mugabe until he nearly lost an eye several years ago. South Africa’s Julius Malema has been charged with hate speech and expelled from ANC. Kizza Besigye of Uganda has suffered untold torture in the hands of strongman Yoweri Museveni. He has been subjected to numerous house arrests and made to face treason charges.

As Peter Obi enters the new phase of his life, I pray for his life and wellbeing and I hope that he, unlike Awolowo; Azikiwe; Kano; Waziri and MKO Abiola, will live to see a Nigeria of his dream.

December 8, 2024: Professor Nuhu Yaqub was with us in Abuja, in the company of great minds—Jibrin Ibrahim, Yakubu Ochefu, Chris Ogbogbo, Aisha Maikudi, Chido Onuma, Tunji Olaopa, Paul and Paula Edeh, Adagio, Okello Oculi, John Odah and many more. We did a mini-seminar on Jibrin Ibrahim. I invited Nuhu Yaqub to speak, and he gave a great speech, starting with his introduction to Marxism. Days after, we spoke twice on the phone. An active and healthy man was gone within three days of sickness, leaving us and the world on Saturday, January 4. I was hit by his departure with an emotional anguish that is taking a longer time to heal.

I have known him for decades. As the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Abuja, he invited me twice to give two Keynote Addresses. As the pioneer Vice-Chancellor of Sokoto State University, he and Professor Malami Buba, his Deputy, invited me to give the University’s first Distinguished Lecture. We exchanged family visits in Austin and Abuja. A candid man, he did not require efforts for him to stay in mind on all aspects of national issues.

The phenomenon of death remains one mystery that humans, and maybe all living creatures, may not understand for its strange nature. At the superficial level, death signifies the finitude to everything living, and it is in this category of interpretation that we humans lurk ourselves, not because we are sometimes not inclined to see beyond the anguish that is brought when we lose people who are dear to us, but because the human mind is not conditioned to process the shock, the urgency, and the forever delinking which occurs when we lose individuals or cherished pets.

Death is a leveller, for it takes the lives of everything without concerns about the irreparable damage that it does to the people behind it. Losing a giant intellectual and humanitarian energy such as Professor Yaqub has dug yet another deep hole in our national heart and left a hollow space that may be difficult to fill. We feel this way because we consider his demise not as a transition into another phase of human existence, which it originally signifies, but as a finitude to the material importance for which the man is known to his immediate family, academic family and national brotherhood.

To say that I am overwhelmed is to mildly describe my emotional state at the breaking of the news that the selfless individual has passed on. It is such a case for me because, in academic brotherhood, it is not only difficult to come across people genuinely committed to a lifelong philosophy, but it is almost impossible to come across individuals who have the mental energy or the political goodwill to effect changes when they could walk their talk.

But then I am only consoled by the understanding that although Professor Yaqub’s transition might have done unprintable damage to our emotional health because of the various shared ideas, values and virtues, his passing on has foregrounded the irreplaceable importance of committing oneself to a meaningful philosophy. It is on this basis that I highlight the exceptional contributions that this individual made to the human world before his transition.

As a political scientist, it has been established that Nuhu Yaqub devoted his intellectual ambition towards the actualization of better national conditions by facilitating a radical evolution of Nigeria’s political system in ways that address its specific and unique peculiarities. Aware of its diversity, the outstanding Professor had campaigned for inclusive leadership to be embraced by the political players in the country in the spirit of creating a haven for the citizens and forging a country that is capable of answering to the wishes and aspirations of everyone.

To become a national hero in my book, what matters is to demonstrate some consistency in one’s philosophical conviction as long as it does not endanger the human family. I can say confidently that this man was not only consistent about his conviction but also invested in it in every sense. I remember clearly how he staunchly argued and equally supported courses of action that would see to the rapid departure from the colonially imposed political culture in exchange for one that would fix the country and free people from the shackles of ideological suppression.

Unlike many other academics, Yaqub was very practical with his solutions, especially because he understood that the possibility of achieving greatness lies especially in the ability to be deliberate and disciplined. Perhaps this would explain why he irrevocably supported the idea of clinical scholarship, research, and intellectual engagements that would lead to the enthronement of an academic culture that is both vibrant and resilient. He has never refused to educate anyone who cares to listen that research engagement is at the centre of Nigeria’s and Africa’s political transformation, revealing why it is dangerous to compromise on such a commitment.

Would it not be surprising that such a man was foresighted in his examination of our basic sociological and sociopolitical fate, so much so that he campaigned that education was a necessity for everyone if the country would evolve to become a force in the global society? He was motivated to say this because he understood the underlying potential that is lurking in the human and natural resources that the country is blessed with. To become an important force in the world, people have always been required to evaluate events from an impartial angle, and that can only be possible on the occasion that people are given a solid education. It is understandable because many issues that are causing problems in the country are founded on the beliefs that are imposed by individuals who constantly take away the right to education of their citizens.

You would begin to understand and not underestimate his position when you appreciate the place of education in the formulation of policies that are needed for the transformation of a country. I have held numerous dialogues with him, and at every opportunity, no matter how little, he would strike up conversations about national issues that are pivotal to the country’s civilizational advancement. In any case, what dominates such conversations is that education is needed in policy formulation because it is through policies that humans transfer their refined ideas to organized guidelines to be used in guiding the decisions of the government to achieve great outcomes. If people are uneducated, there is a possibility that they will be micromanaged by others who have that advantage. This is the fear of the righteous man who committed to such a just course. He has maintained over time that when people are intellectually refined enough to contribute to the debate of welfare improvement, especially as it relates to them, they would, therefore, be encouraged to participate in the affairs of the country if they are given the fair atmosphere where they can thrive without any external threat.

Away from the strictly professional life that this successful man lived, it would be strange that people of his educational and administrative stature still maintained a life of humility and embrace, as he did not consider himself as being superior to people on account of his giant strides in life. Evidence of his selflessness and humility abounds as people with whom he shared one thing or the other have attested to how he opened his space to anyone who wants to experience it.

For a man who was erstwhile Vice Chancellor of the University of Abuja, the information about how to manage opposing opinions to drive the monumental changes that are recorded in the academic institution today cannot cease to amaze people. More than anything, they are indicators that he was professionally inclined and discharged his very responsibility with a great sense of commitment and demeanour. It cannot be overemphasized how his simple nature infected many of the people who have come across the man in different spheres of existence. I cannot stress enough how his sudden demise has brought some hard reality that is difficult to swallow.

How else can we describe the individual as great, especially in the course of academic liberation, if not through a series of great initiatives he made to improve the conditions of things? It was under him as a Vice Chancellor that the University moved out from their temporary site to the permanent one, which required a great deal of sacrifice from members of staff, and he championed it. Not minding the personal and professional costs that this demanded, Professor Yaqub became an important figure in shaping the university. It is no coincidence that his death has sparked a national reflection as people who have either benefited from the largesse of his professional responsibilities or those who had personal relationships with him continue to reveal how his demise has become a national melancholy.

It is understandable for them to feel this way. I have become so engrossed in his scholarly interests and contributions that his sudden departure to the great beyond has dug a hole in my heart.

اللَّهُمَّ اغْفِرْ لَهُ وَارْحَمْهُ وَأَدْخِلْهُ فِي جَنَّتِكَ

Allahummaghfir lahu warhamhu wa adkhilhu fee jannatika.

Translation: O Allah, forgive him, have mercy on him, and admit him into Your Paradise.

Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, has recently been embroiled in political disputes, frequently invoking President Bola Tinubu’s name in his conflicts with political opponents. Wike accused former Rivers State Governor Peter Odili of encouraging Governor Siminalayi Fubara to disobey Tinubu, blaming Odili for the breakdown of a peace agreement brokered by Tinubu in 2023. The peace deal was aimed at resolving political tensions in Rivers State but fell apart, with Wike claiming that Odili influenced Fubara against the President’s directives.

The rift between Wike and Fubara has grown over time, with Wike alleging that he has been wrongly accused of attempting to convert Rivers State into his personal estate. Wike defended his legacy, stating that his administration transformed Rivers State into a medical hub for the South-South region and emphasized that he remains the best governor the state has ever had. He accused Odili of misleading people for personal interests and stated that he would not apologize for his comments.

Wike’s habit of bringing Tinubu into his political battles has become a recurring and concerning pattern. He often invokes the President’s name to justify his actions, claiming loyalty to Tinubu as a shield for his political maneuverings. Wike openly admitted to working against the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) during the 2023 elections, opposing the party’s presidential candidate, to support Tinubu. While Wike argued that his decision was driven by the need to support a Southern president, the reality is that this rationale has since been overshadowed by his ongoing personal vendettas. Wike, wait for the next election to test your political relevance. Leave Tinubu out of your pains, grievances, and self-inflicted fights. Instead, he continues to seek validation through relentless, and often petty, political confrontations. His actions suggest a deeper issue—an inability to let go and accept the reality of governance shifting away from his influence in Rivers State especially.

Wike’s confrontations extend beyond his conflict with Governor Fubara. He is also fighting some governors who support Fubara, a female senator representing the FCT, prominent PDP stakeholders, and respected elders in his state. Wike has been known to oppose anyone who tells him he cannot control everything. His persistent attempts to maintain control over Fubara, even after leaving office as governor, reflect his desire to wield influence indefinitely. Despite his departure from office, Wike continues to assert dominance, often bringing Tinubu’s name into his disputes.

For far too long, public perception has been that Wike was using the police and the judiciary to fight Governor Fubara. However, as of today, both institutions have decided to follow the rule of law, shifting the balance of power in the ongoing conflict. This development highlights the importance of adhering to lawful processes in resolving political disputes.

As a psychologist, I cannot diagnose Wike without a formal assessment, but from media observations, he appears to be a man who is angry, jealous, and possibly obsessed. His actions raise significant concerns, as he consistently reacts to Governor Fubara’s movements across Rivers State. Whenever Fubara addresses state matters, celebrates a project, visits an elder, or even attends a church service to thank the people for their ongoing support, Wike follows up with a similar action. He leaves Abuja, where he resides and works, to counter Fubara’s engagements in Rivers State. This disturbing pattern could suggest a deep-seated need for control and validation. It raises the question: what is driving Wike’s behavior? Is he threatened by Fubara’s growing influence or simply unable to relinquish his grip on power in Rivers State? This obsessive pattern cannot be dismissed lightly.

What makes this behavior even more alarming is Wike’s tendency to drag President Tinubu into these petty battles. He seems to wield Tinubu’s name as a shield and a weapon in his quest to undermine Fubara. It’s a classic case of using higher authority to mask personal insecurity. Wike fails to see that Tinubu is preoccupied with addressing Nigeria’s pressing challenges—economic recovery, national unity, and infrastructural development. Tinubu does not have time for Wike’s personal vendettas, yet Wike continuously forces the President’s name into irrelevant conflicts, distorting the focus of governance.

Wike’s fixation on undermining Fubara has reached embarrassing levels. Even routine events such as Fubara’s church visits or interactions with local communities seem to provoke a competitive response from Wike. He cannot seem to bear the idea of Fubara receiving praise or support without immediately attempting to overshadow him. It appears Wike cannot tolerate being out of the spotlight for even a moment.

The public has grown weary of these antics. Nigerians are facing serious hardships—rising inflation, unemployment, insecurity, and economic instability. Tinubu is navigating these challenges by working across regions, party lines, and religious divides to foster unity and development. In contrast, Wike’s behavior is self-serving, driven by an inflated ego and a desire to control Rivers State from the shadows. His actions serve no one but himself and are increasingly viewed as a distraction from the real issues affecting ordinary citizens.

It is important to note that Tinubu appointed Wike as FCT Minister after reports that Wike helped Tinubu secure electoral victory in Rivers State by any means necessary. However, Nigeria is now grappling with significant economic challenges, and the President is focused on addressing these issues. Tinubu is working tirelessly across regions, party lines, and religious divides to bring about positive change and improve the lives of Nigerians.

Wike’s behavior also reveals a man who is trapped in the past, still viewing governance through the lens of his own tenure. He refuses to accept that Rivers State has moved on under Fubara’s leadership. His inability to relinquish control signifies a deeper problem of entitlement, where he believes that his influence must remain unchallenged. This obsession with power blinds him to the real needs of the people he once governed, reducing his legacy to one of constant disruption and political sabotage.

While Tinubu remains committed to national development, Wike, even in 2025, appears to be more focused on promoting his own agenda. His actions are still sentimentally centered around himself, rather than the broader needs of the country. Wike must recognize that Nigeria is dealing with critical issues, and the President is making efforts to unify the nation and foster growth across all sectors and regions. It is imperative for political leaders to support these efforts and move beyond personal interests for the greater good of the country.

Wike’s repeated attempts to overshadow Fubara point to a fragile ego that cannot stand seeing others succeed. It’s a classic case of political insecurity, where one man’s inability to relinquish power is threatening the stability of an entire state. Wike needs to understand that leadership is not about perpetual control but about nurturing growth and progress for future generations. His ongoing interference is not only detrimental to Rivers State but also diminishes his standing on the national stage.

While Wike continues to bring Tinubu’s name into his political fights, the President remains focused on national development and promoting progress across all regions of Nigeria. Tinubu recently visited Enugu State, marking his first official trip to the state since assuming office in May 2023. During his visit, he commissioned several key projects initiated by the Governor Peter Mbah-led administration, aimed at improving infrastructure, education, healthcare, and security in the state.

The projects inaugurated by Tinubu included 30 completed smart green schools out of 260 under construction across the state’s wards, as well as 60 fully equipped Type 2 Primary Healthcare Centres. Additionally, he commissioned 90 urban roads in Enugu City, a multi-functional Enugu International Conference Centre, and a state-of-the-art Command and Control Centre to bolster security efforts. The President also launched 150 patrol vehicles fitted with AI-embedded surveillance cameras to enhance security across the state.

Tinubu was accompanied by high-profile dignitaries, including Abia State Governor Alex Otti, National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu, Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Benjamin Kalu, and Minister of Works Dave Umahi. However, notable absentees included Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, Anambra State Governor Charles Soludo, and Ebonyi State Governor Francis Nwifiru. It remains unclear if these governors sent representatives to the event.

Tinubu’s commitment to development and national unity is evident through his actions. By commissioning projects across different regions, he is encouraging growth and progress irrespective of regional or political affiliations. His focus remains on addressing Nigeria’s economic challenges and improving the quality of life for its citizens.

It is crucial for Wike to stop using Tinubu’s name as leverage in his political battles. Tinubu has enough pressing national economic issues to address, and his focus should remain on fostering development across the country. Political leaders like Wike should engage in constructive governance and avoid dragging the President into personal conflicts. Tinubu’s actions, such as his visit to Enugu and the commissioning of significant projects, demonstrate his dedication to promoting development in all parts of Nigeria, regardless of regional differences.

Wike must understand that governance is about progress, not obsession. His actions are eroding his legacy and sowing seeds of division in Rivers State. It is time for him to step back, accept the reality of Fubara’s leadership, and focus on constructive contributions to national development.

Nigeria needs leaders who can inspire progress and foster cooperation, not distractions driven by personal vendettas. True leadership is about empowering others and recognizing when it is time to let go of the reins of power. It is not about clinging to influence through relentless, petty confrontations. Wike must make a choice: does he want to be remembered as a statesman who contributed to national progress, or as a disruptor who couldn’t let go of personal grudges? The choice is his, and history will judge him accordingly.

As we enter 2025, the message is clear: Nigeria needs healing and forward movement. Wike must leave Tinubu out of his grievances and recognize that the President is focused on addressing the country’s economic challenges. This is not the time for endless battles over personal relevance. It is a time for unity, progress, and a collective effort to move the nation forward. For God’s sake, it’s time to let go of the past and build a better future.

African proverbs often carry timeless wisdom, guiding us through the complexities of life and leadership. One such saying reminds us, “When a child is helped to ascend the hilly road from the river, he gets home and tells his parents that his helper merely held one of his hands, claiming he did the rest.” This proverb cautions against the dangers of ingratitude, which diminishes the collective effort behind any success.

The recent comments by Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and former Governor of Rivers State, bring this proverb to life. Speaking at a civic reception for loyal politicians in Port Harcourt, Wike dismissed claims that he was made governor by others, insisting he fought his way to power. While he acknowledged receiving support, he made it clear that nobody handed him the governorship, contrasting his rise to power with that of his successor, Governor Siminalayi Fubara, whom Wike claims he personally installed.

This article delves into the implications of Wike’s remarks, which reflect a troubling trend of self-aggrandizement in leadership, disregard for gratitude, and a failure to embrace the communal essence of governance.

Leadership, especially in a democracy, is rarely a one-man show. It is a collective effort fueled by the support of voters, party structures, allies, and mentors. Wike’s rise to power is no exception. While he may have demonstrated personal grit, it is undeniable that key figures, including former President Goodluck Jonathan, his wife, Patience Jonathan, and Peter Odili, played pivotal roles in his emergence as Rivers State Governor in 2015.

At the time, Rotimi Amaechi, the then-governor, had fallen out with the Jonathans, prompting them to back Wike, who was a trusted ally. Videos circulating on social media even show Patience Jonathan presenting Wike as the preferred successor to Amaechi. These contributions were not mere formalities, they were instrumental to his emergence as the governor of Rivers State at the time. 

By downplaying the roles these figures played, Wike not only rewrites history but also diminishes the value of collective effort in leadership. His statement risks alienating those who contributed to his success, reinforcing the notion that he views governance as a solitary conquest rather than a communal responsibility.

The African saying, “The River that forgets its source will dry up,” underscores the consequences of ingratitude. Leaders who fail to acknowledge the contributions of others risk eroding trust and goodwill, which are essential for sustaining leadership. Wike’s remarks come across as dismissive, if not outright ungrateful, towards those who supported him in his political journey.

Acknowledging the contributions of others does not diminish one’s achievements; rather, it enhances credibility and fosters unity. Wike’s failure to do so sends a demoralizing message to his supporters and aspiring leaders, undermining the very essence of democracy.

Wike’s insistence that he fought his way to power, while perhaps partly true, feeds into a broader issue of self-adulation that has no place in democratic leadership. Democracy is built on the principle that leaders are stewards of the people’s trust, not self-made monarchs.

When leaders begin to view themselves as the sole architects of their success, it fosters arrogance and a lack of accountability. Such attitudes can alienate allies, discourage collaboration, and ultimately weaken democratic institutions. Wike’s contrasting narrative, asserting that he made himself governor while he made Fubara governor, further complicates matters. It not only trivializes the people’s role in electing leaders but also sets a dangerous precedent for how power is perceived and wielded.

Gratitude is not just an ethical obligation; it is a practical necessity for good leadership. The African proverb, “The one who climbs a good tree is helped by many hands,” reminds us that success is rarely achieved in isolation. Leaders who recognize and honor the contributions of others strengthen their moral authority and foster a culture of respect and collaboration.

Wike’s remarks, if delivered with humility, could have conveyed a different message. Acknowledging that he fought for his political survival while also expressing deep gratitude for the support he received would have painted him as both strong and humble, a rare but powerful combination in leadership.

Wike’s statement offers a cautionary tale for aspiring leaders about the dangers of ingratitude and self-aggrandizement. Leadership is not just about achieving power; it is about serving others and building bridges. The African proverb, “A tree does not make a forest,” underscores the importance of collective effort.

Aspiring leaders must learn that acknowledging the roles others play in their journey does not make them weak, rather, it makes them relatable and credible. Gratitude builds trust, strengthens alliances, and inspires the next generation of leaders to embrace humility and service.

As a seasoned politician, Wike has the opportunity to reshape his narrative. Gratitude, even when belated, has the power to mend relationships and rebuild trust. By openly acknowledging the contributions of those who supported him, Wike can demonstrate that he values collaboration and respects the democratic process.

Furthermore, as a minister and elder statesman, Wike should strive to be a unifying figure rather than a polarizing one. His current position offers him a platform to mentor aspiring leaders and reinforce the principles of humility, gratitude, and service.

Wike’s assertion that he made himself governor, while perhaps a reflection of his political resilience, misses a critical point about leadership: no one succeeds alone. The African proverb warns us that “The hand that gives is never forgotten.” Leaders who embrace gratitude not only honor their supporters but also lay the groundwork for enduring legacies.

Wike’s comments serve as a reminder of the importance of humility and gratitude in leadership. By acknowledging the collective effort behind his success, he can set a positive example for the next generation and reinforce the democratic values that underpin governance. In the end, true leadership is not about claiming credit but about serving others and celebrating the communal journey that makes success possible.

Economic, social, and political conditions influence healthcare, a reflection of societal advancement. From ancient civilisations to modern nations, the development of healthcare systems has been a testament to societal priorities and quality of  governance. The ability to deliver healthcare services reflects the state’s commitment to its citizens’ welfare and fosters long-term national growth by improving human capital and productivity. A nation’s healthcare infrastructure plays a vital role in shaping economic output, as healthier populations are more likely to contribute effectively to the workforce, innovate, and drive forward a country’s social and economic engine.  

Moreover, healthcare advancements can serve as a unifying factor, bridging gaps in inequality and reinforcing trust in governance. The evolution of healthcare over the centuries reflects the continuous journey of societies striving for better living standards. From rudimentary herbal remedies to sophisticated surgeries and digital health solutions, healthcare advancements mirror human resilience and ingenuity. Societies prioritising health have often experienced more excellent political stability, longer life expectancies, and accelerated economic growth. 

Ancient Egypt stands out as a prime example of a society that understood the importance of healthcare. In Deir el-Medina, a village housing workers was constructing royal tombs, and organised medical care was provided, highlighting the existence of one of the earliest governmental healthcare systems. Egyptian medicine was advanced, incorporating surgical skills, specialisation, and formal training. Physicians such as Imhotep revered as the first recorded physician, set foundational practices for the medical profession. 

Modern parallels can be drawn to nations like Germany and Japan, whose healthcare systems are ranked among the best globally. Germany’s universal healthcare system, dating back to the 1880s under Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, covers over 90% of its population. The German system comprises comprehensive services, including maternity care, preventive medicine, and mental health support. Japan’s focus on preventive care has contributed to one of the highest life expectancy rates in the world, with average life expectancy reaching 84.6 years by 2023. This is primarily attributed to regular health check-ups, early disease detection, and an emphasis on diet and exercise.

Just as Ancient Egypt’s healthcare advancements reflected societal values, modern nations viewed healthcare improvements as essential progress indicators. Healthcare systems today drive societal growth by reducing mortality, enhancing quality of life, and enabling greater productivity and participation. However, a  2022 Lancet report ranking health systems performance using healthcare access and quality placed Nigeria at 142 out of 195 countries, right in the basement. The maternal mortality rate remains high, at 512 deaths per 100,000 live births as of 2023, the third highest globally. Only 39% of children were fully immunised, compared to the global average of 85, reflecting systemic challenges in healthcare delivery. High out-of-pocket expenses, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a shortage of medical personnel contributed to these statistics. However, countries like South Africa have an immunisation coverage rate of 82%, and Rwanda boasts a 95% immunisation rate, showcasing the potential for improvement through targeted healthcare policies and community engagement programs.

At the start of 2024, there was a palpable sense that healthcare was returning as a national priority in Nigeria. This renewed focus came after the appointment of Professor Muhammad Ali Pate as Coordinating Minister of Health in 2023. Last year witnessed a pivotal change in Nigeria’s health sector. Public intellectuals must objectively criticise government policies and officials because that forms the basis for improvement and growth. This critique often highlights areas of concern and challenges and calls for action by government officials and institutions responsible for them. However, recognising achievements and encouraging and praising where necessary are essential. Recognising achievements in the health sector boosts public morale, reinforces trust, and fosters innovation.

Under Professor Pate’s leadership, the Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative (NHSRII) was introduced to overhaul the health sector by addressing systemic issues and driving sustainable improvements. The initiative is anchored on four critical pillars: strengthening leadership, policy development, and accountability; enhancing infrastructure, training, and healthcare delivery; encouraging private sector investment and local manufacturing; and focusing on preparedness and response to health emergencies. NHSRII aims to reduce healthcare inequalities, promote gender equity in access to services, and ensure the sustainability of health reforms.

NHSRII is implemented through a Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp), which ensures coordinated action across all levels of government, aligns donor efforts with national policies, and fosters collaboration among stakeholders to drive meaningful progress. This integrated approach draws inspiration from successful models in countries like Ghana and Tanzania, where SWAp has been used to streamline donor funding and align development assistance with national healthcare strategies.

One of the most notable achievements in the past year in the health sector is the reduction in under-five mortality by 16.7%. This decline, from 132 per 1,000 live births in 2018 to 110 per 1,000 live births in 2023, marks significant progress in child health. The reduction highlights improvements in prenatal care, better nutrition programmes, and expanded vaccination campaigns. This significant reduction in under-five mortality should reassure the audience about the effectiveness and progress of the Healthcare system, instilling a sense of confidence and trust.

In 2024, Nigeria achieved a milestone in HPV vaccination, with 12.3 million girls aged 9-14 years vaccinated across all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), representing 96% of the target population. This achievement is the highest global coverage for HPV vaccination, providing a critical defence against cervical cancer. Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths among Nigerian women, making this effort pivotal in reducing long-term mortality rates. The initiative also underscores the importance of community engagement, school-based vaccination programs, and public awareness campaigns. By involving the community, these initiatives make every individual feel integral to the process, fostering a sense of involvement and responsibility.

In November 2024, Nigeria launched a malaria vaccine pilot program in Bayelsa and Kebbi states. Currently, 41,145 children have been vaccinated, reflecting the government’s commitment to addressing endemic diseases. Malaria accounts for 23% of child mortality in Nigeria, and the successful pilot paves the way for nationwide expansion, potentially saving thousands of lives annually.

Health insurance expansion is another critical area of progress. By 2024, all states had functional State Health Insurance Agencies (SSHIAs). Over NGN 12 billion has been disbursed, covering 1.7 million lives. The National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) surpassed its 2024 target by enrolling 2 million Nigerians, representing a 14% increase from the previous year. Currently, 19.4 million individuals are insured, marking an essential step towards universal health coverage and reducing the financial burden of healthcare.

The healthcare sector is experiencing increased investment, with 74 pipeline companies actively discussing 22 significant projects. Most initiatives involve foreign manufacturers deploying funding to establish or support local manufacturing operations in Nigeria. This effort, amounting to over $2 billion, highlights the importance of regulatory support and market-shaping strategies. 

Human resources for health have also been prioritised, with 53,732 health workers retrained across 32 states, contributing to improved service delivery. This retraining programme equips frontline health workers with updated maternal and child health skills, disease prevention, and emergency response. The curriculum integrates the latest medical advancements and emphasises hands-on training, ensuring healthcare workers are prepared to manage various health conditions. This investment in human capital is expected to enhance healthcare outcomes, reduce medical errors, and increase patient satisfaction. 

One of the critical challenges facing Nigeria’s healthcare system is workforce migration. The exodus of skilled healthcare professionals seeking better opportunities abroad has led to a shortage of qualified personnel, straining the capacity of health facilities across the country. The National Policy on Health Workforce Migration was introduced in August 2024 to address this. This policy focuses on improving working conditions, offering better incentives, and providing career development opportunities to retain healthcare professionals. Salary increments, improved job security, and enhanced welfare packages are among the measures implemented to curb migration. Additionally, the initiative seeks to attract Nigerian healthcare workers from the diaspora, encouraging them to return and contribute to the local system by providing reintegration programs, competitive salaries, and grants for healthcare entrepreneurship.

Despite the  modest progress, Nigeria faces budgetary constraints that threaten the sustainability of these reforms. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s proposed 2025 budget allocates only 5.18% (2.48 trillion naira) to healthcare, falling short of the 15% target set by the Abuja Declaration. This underscores the need for more effective use of available resources. The Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) will be instrumental in ensuring that limited funds are maximised. By aligning donor contributions with national policies and creating a unified framework, Nigeria can enhance the efficiency and impact of health spending. Increasing domestic investment, fostering public-private partnerships, and expanding tax revenue allocated to healthcare will be crucial for sustaining progress and driving economic growth.

In conclusion, Nigeria’s renewed focus on healthcare signals a critical turning point in the nation’s development. The progress achieved through initiatives like NHSRII, immunisation programmes , and workforce retention strategies reflects a broader commitment to improving public health. Recognising achievements in the health sector energises the sector. By celebrating milestones and addressing challenges proactively, Nigeria can build a resilient healthcare system capable of meeting future needs and improving overall societal well-being. Sustained investment, collaboration, and accountability will be essential in ensuring the longevity and impact of these reforms.

In a move to address the unique skincare challenges faced by women of colour, Skin by Zaron has launched a new Vitamin C range designed to tackle concerns such as hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, and sensitivity to harsh formulations.

Formally unveiled at a press conference in Lagos recently, the range aims to provide tailored beauty solutions for melanin-rich skin, an often underrepresented segment in the skincare industry.

During the event, representatives from Skin by Zaron shared insights into the rigorous formulation process, emphasising the use of high-quality ingredients such as Vitamin C, Vitamin E, castor oil, and collagen, combined with soothing agents to ensure the products brighten and hydrate without causing irritation.

The range includes a cleanser, serum, moisturiser, and sunscreen—all designed to work in tandem to address common skin concerns while providing essential sun protection, a key factor for melanin-rich skin prone to pigmentation issues from sun exposure.

Founder and CEO of Zaron Cosmetics Limited, Oke Maduewesi, took attendees through what informed the formulation of the range:

“As the fastest-growing beauty brand in Africa, what we really pride ourselves on is that we make products for women of colour, by women of colour, who better understand and develop products for them. Our brand’s shift to skincare was informed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the skin education it spurred at the time, leading to extensive research spanning years that involved tests on actual Africans under similar conditions in Africa.”

She added, “A few years ago, I’m sure we all witnessed how Nigerians gravitated towards skin-whitening products. When we started Skin by Zaron, many told us we would be out of business if we didn’t have a bleaching range. But our reputation doesn’t support that.”

The introduction of this Vitamin C range further reflects Skin by Zaron’s commitment to inclusivity, reinforcing the brand’s role in promoting accessible, effective skincare solutions for women of colour in Africa.

[ThisDay]