Nigerians are groaning under the weight of food inflation which in March this year stood at 41.1 % as a result of the devaluation of the naira and high importation of food items. It is the same with transport inflation which currently stands at about 30% because of government unavoidable removal of fuel subsidy scam costing the country N3trillion loss yearly and consequent increase in pump price of imported petrol. Government has continued to appeal to Nigerians for more sacrifice while assuring us of greater gains after the current pains.

While most enlightened Nigerians identified with government plea that we cannot have omelette without first breaking an egg, many believe Nigerians are being asked to pay for the sins of unpatriotic Nigerians especially in the oil and banking sector responsible for our current economic nightmare. It was for this reason government came up with some palliatives and also set up a tripartite body of 37 members with organized Labour to look at the issue of minimum wage in the country.

Unfortunately, as it has turned out, if Joe Ajaero who has not been able to distance himself from the Labour Party and his group are not playing politics, they are out rightly incompetent. While it often takes as much as a year to negotiate a minimum wage in other climes, what manner of Labour leader after two strikes in less than a year, would declare  a third one, arrogantly labelled  “indefinite strike” without a thought for the health of the economy of a nation in distress?

The immediate cause of Ajaero’s current indefinite strike was because of a stall in negotiation by the tripartite body set up by government that has offered N60,000 as minimum wage as against Organized Private Sector’s (OPS)  N57,000 and Ajaero Labour’s unrealistic N476,000. Obsessed with the federal government headed by their political foe, Ajaero and organized labour forgot that besides the federal government, other stakeholders include the 36 states of the federation, 15 of who are yet to fully implement the N30,000 minimum wage approved by President Buhari in 2019  and 774 LGAs battling for survival.                                                       

For any competent labour leader, as observed by Daniel Bwala (Atiku’s former spokesman) on TVC programme on Monday, figures presented during wage negotiation must be based on available and verified government resources .The starting point according to him is to find out how much is accruing to government, its distribution and identifying sectors Labour believes can be starved of funds to accommodate its own demand.

In other words, Ajaero and his group ought to know that the main source of government revenue is taxation: (personal income tax, corporate tax, excise duties, export and import duties, royalties from oil and other minerals, government domestic borrowings through sale of government securities through stock exchange and external borrowings through bonds for long term government loans or borrowings from IMF or World Bank and foreign grants.)

The above revenue figures can be accessed  by labour leaders during budget debate and budget public hearing  while the  concurrent and capital expenditures the revenues  are to cover can also be scrutinized.

But instead of going through this constitutional process, what did Ajaero and his fellow politicians masquerading as union leaders do? They came up with arbitrary figures they claimed was based on cost of feeding an individual member of a family of six thrice a day for one month, citing the current price of imported bag of rice.

But we don’t need to be labour leaders to know that minimum wage is for starters and not for a family of six. In any case, when did the number of children a family decides to have become the criteria for fixing minimum wage in a nation operating a market driven economy?  We can as well advance Labour’s sloppy argument by saying since Islam allows adherents to marry four wives and indeed a member of the federal legislature once displayed his four wives and some two dozen children on the floor of the house, we might as well settle for four wives and 22 children as the basis for arriving at a minimum wage.

It is surprising that in their overenthusiasm to shut the nation and its wobbling economy down indefinitely, over their proposed unrealistic figures of N475, 000 for a cleaner or a messenger, they forgot the monster we are currently fighting is inflation.  Precisely because they believe they can intimidate the federal government and the state government including Imo State where they were once involved in fisticuffs with party rivals, they pretended they did not know that they cannot force private sector to give what they cannot afford or dissuade them from downsizing. A Senior Advocate of Nigeria invited to throw more light on the issue by ARISE TV on Monday evening did not weigh words. If asked to pay Labour’s unrealistic minimum wage, he would reduce number of lawyers in his chambers by half, he declared.

But more disturbing is the way Ajaero and his ill-trained labour leaders behave as if they are above the law. Their first strike just as this government was taking off was said to be illegal. Their current indefinite strike has been declared illegal by the well-respected Minister of Justice and Attorney General. And as if to confirm Ajaero’s penchant for behaving as if he is above the law of the land, last Monday in addition to ordering hospitals and international airports across the country be shut down, he also shut down the national grid, an illegal act that constitute a threat to national security.

President Tinubu is an avowed democrat who believes in the rule of law. And this is why he must ensure those engaged in illegal and callous shutting down of the national grid must be made to face the law. And with three strikes in one year, two of which were illegal, it is apparent, Ajaero’s goal is not workers’ welfare but destabilizing the country. We could not have suddenly forgotten that some members of his party called for military take-over following their electoral defeat in 2023.

Kano sibling spiritual wars

 Lamido Sanusi’s sermon at last Friday prayers centred on the need for Muslims to accept their destiny for good or for bad: “We must believe whatever happens to us is predetermined and what we couldn’t have is also from God”. For those who claim religion is the opium of the poor, the Hausa masses who literarily worship their emir and spiritual leader are not complaining over their lot in life? On his path, by focusing on the theme of contentment, Sanusi is doing his job of preventing social dislocations by those who live in abject poverty while emirs live in opulence or as Fela put it. (Suffer suffer for earth enjoy for heaven while the Pope and Iman de enjoy for earth).

A few years back, Sanusi also paid glowing tribute to his grandfather who supervised the famous Kano groundnut pyramids and his father who attended one of the best universities in the world. Sanusi, the father or the son, didn’t need to be troubled that the children of labourers who laboured day and night to cultivate the groundnut farms while emirs sent their own children to the best universities in the world, ended up as labourers. After all the policy of feudalism is ‘labourers born labourers’.  And precisely because  emirs’ word among the ruled, rich or poor, is law, his admonition to Ado Bayero, the deposed cousin he replaced  to accept his destiny, is in order.