A former Minister of Aviation, Osita Chidoka, has announced his resignation from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Chidoka, who was also the Corps Marshal of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), disclosed this during his appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Friday.

He said he is leaving politics to focus on his non-profitable organisation, Athena Centre to join hands with other Nigerians who are interested in reforming the political system in Nigeria.

“Earlier today, I sent a letter to my ward in Anambra State resigning officially from the PDP. I am leaving the PDP, I am leaving politic for some time, I am focusing on the Athena Centre,” Chidoka said on the programme.

“I will work in concert with other Nigerians who want us to reform the political system to bring evidence-based governance and to support it. So, effective today, I am no longer a member of the Peoples Democratic Party.”

‘Edo election compromised’

Athena Centre founded by Chidoka conducted a review of the recently concluded governorship election in Edo State where the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Monday Okpebholo, was declared winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), defeating closest challenger, Asue Ighodalo of the PDP.

The Athena Centre indicted INEC, stating that the election was compromised.

According to Chidoka, who presented the Centre’s findings on the Edo State election, there was substantial evidence of systemic rigging.

“The evidence of systemic rigging observed in this election is so substantial that we cannot call the results.

“The evidence of systemic rigging is so substantial that we think that this election should not be allowed to stand. If this stands, then there is no election in 2027.”

He said he is shocked that an institution like INEC will put its reputation at stake for the purpose of an election.

The former minister alleged that there was lack of transparency in the election and discrepancies in voter accreditation.

He also alleged incidences of overvoting, manipulation at ward collation centres and that the BVAS accreditation record was not transmitted to INEC Result Viewing Portal (IReV).

He stated that 153 polling units were not accounted for which means there were no results from those polling units.

He concluded that the Edo State election cannot be deemed credible because it failed to meet basic integrity standard due to substantial interference in the electoral process by the umpire.

[Channels]

Barely weeks into his tenure as the governor of Edo State, Monday Okpebholo finds himself at the center of an unrelenting storm of political distractions. These challenges are primarily emanating from the camp of his predecessor, Godwin Obaseki, and his loyalists. While political transitions often involve disagreements, the incessant nature of these attacks risks undermining Okpebholo’s administration before it gains full momentum. For the sake of the people of Edo State, it is imperative that this trend ends so the new governor can focus on fulfilling his mandate.

For instance, the Edo State chapter of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) recently leveled serious allegations against Governor Okpebholo. At a press conference, Dr. Anthony Aziegbemi, the caretaker chairman of the PDP in Edo State, accused Okpebholo of squandering over ₦30 billion supposedly left behind by the Godwin Obaseki administration within 14 days of taking office. The funds, he claimed, were used to compensate political “godfathers” who facilitated Okpebholo’s electoral victory.

Additionally, Aziegbemi alleged that Okpebholo had procured ₦5 billion worth of vehicles without following due process and was attempting to justify ₦2 billion as inauguration costs. He also criticized the APC-led administration for failing to pay November salaries on time, a deviation from the prompt payments that characterized the Obaseki era.

While these accusations are concerning, they have not been substantiated with concrete evidence. The Edo State government, through Fred Itua, Chief Press Secretary to Governor Okpebholo, has strongly denied these claims, labeling them as baseless propaganda intended to tarnish the new administration. Itua also stated that the government was committed to exposing the alleged rot left behind by Obaseki’s administration, setting the stage for a clash of narratives.

In response to the allegations, Governor Okpebholo announced the formation of a 14-member State Assets Verification Committee. The committee was tasked with reviewing the handover process and ensuring transparency in the management of state resources. While this move might seem like a logical step toward accountability, it has been met with sharp criticism from Obaseki’s camp.

Crusoe Osagie, media aide to Godwin Obaseki, dismissed the probes as a “circus of meaningless theatrics,” accusing Okpebholo of using them as a smokescreen to distract from his lack of preparedness for governance. Osagie argued that Okpebholo’s focus on investigations rather than delivering tangible results was indicative of an administration that had no clear developmental agenda.

Osagie further touted Obaseki’s achievements, including the creation of Edo State’s first-ever asset register, and accused Okpebholo of attempting to rewrite the narrative surrounding the transition process. He went on to suggest that the probes were motivated by the interests of Okpebholo’s alleged political godfathers, who were seeking revenge for being denied access to state resources during Obaseki’s tenure.

It is evident that the ongoing squabbles between the camps of Obaseki and Okpebholo are less about governance and more about political dominance. Obaseki, who defected to the PDP after a fallout with the All Progressives Congress (APC), spent much of his second term battling political adversaries. His administration, while praised in some quarters for reforms, was also criticized for alienating key stakeholders.

Okpebholo’s emergence as governor under the APC banner signaled a return to power for the party in Edo State. However, rather than accepting this reality, Obaseki’s loyalists seem intent on undermining the new administration. By focusing on unsubstantiated allegations and dismissing every move made by the governor, they risk creating an atmosphere of perpetual instability in the state.

Lost in this political tug-of-war are the people of Edo State, who stand to lose the most from these distractions. Edo citizens elected Okpebholo with the hope that he would address pressing issues such as unemployment, poor infrastructure, and economic stagnation. Every minute spent on political mudslinging and counter-allegations is a minute lost in addressing these challenges.

It is essential for both parties to remember that governance is about serving the people, not settling political scores. The PDP and Obaseki’s camp must understand that their time in power has ended and allow the new administration to focus on its agenda. Similarly, Governor Okpebholo must rise above the noise and concentrate on delivering the promises that got him elected.

While the probes initiated by Okpebholo’s administration are essential for ensuring accountability, they must not become the centerpiece of his tenure. Governance should prioritize development, not endless investigations. The governor must strike a balance between holding the previous administration accountable and driving forward his vision for Edo State.

If Obaseki’s administration was as transparent as it claims, then the probes should not pose a threat. Instead of resisting them, Obaseki’s loyalists should cooperate with the process to prove their innocence. At the same time, Okpebholo must ensure that the investigations are thorough, fair, and devoid of political vendettas.

For Edo State to move forward, both the ruling and opposition parties must prioritize the state’s development over their personal or political interests. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it must be based on facts and presented responsibly. Opposition for opposition’s sake benefits no one, least of all the citizens of Edo State.

Governor Okpebholo, on his part, must remain focused on governance. Key areas that require immediate attention include the prompt payment of salaries, improvement of public infrastructure, and creating a conducive environment for economic growth. By delivering tangible results, he can win the trust of Edo people and silence his critics.

Edo State cannot afford to be trapped in a cycle of political vendettas. The time has come for all stakeholders to set aside their differences and work toward a common goal: the progress and prosperity of Edo State. Obaseki’s loyalists must recognize that their time in power is over and allow the new administration to function without unnecessary interference.

As for Governor Okpebholo, his mandate is clear. The people of Edo State have placed their trust in him to deliver meaningful development and address the challenges facing the state. It is up to him to prove that their trust was not misplaced.

The distractions must end. Let Monday Okpebholo work.

It is not an exaggeration to opine that Senator Jimoh Ibrahim’s recent remarks on Nigeria’s borrowing strategy during an interview on Channels TV have sparked heated debate. The billionaire-turned-politician advocated for the country to take on substantial loans of at least $50 billion to address infrastructure deficits and economic stagnation. While he passionately defended his stance, likening it to Dubai’s $168 billion infrastructure-driven transformation, this proposal is worrisome for many Nigerians already grappling with the crushing effects of excessive borrowing.

Senator Ibrahim’s argument, though seemingly bold, raises critical questions about Nigeria’s debt culture, the track record of managing borrowed funds, and the implications for future generations. Before we plunge headlong into further debt, it is essential to critically analyze the senator’s suggestions and the broader implications of his proposals.

Comparing Nigeria’s borrowing needs to Dubai’s experience is flawed. Dubai’s debt-fueled development was guided by visionary leadership, meticulous planning, and stringent accountability. It was also supported by a relatively small population and a thriving tourism sector capable of generating substantial revenue to service its debts.

Nigeria, on the other hand, faces systemic challenges, including widespread corruption, lack of accountability, and a history of mismanaging borrowed funds. Despite decades of loans from institutions like the World Bank and IMF, critical sectors like health, education, and infrastructure remain in disarray. Senator Ibrahim’s suggestion of borrowing $50 billion is akin to pouring water into a leaking bucket unless these systemic issues are first addressed.

As of now, Nigeria’s debt profile is already staggering, with external debts exceeding $40 billion. Servicing this debt consumes a significant portion of the nation’s revenue, leaving little room for developmental projects. The recently approved $2.2 billion loan, which Ibrahim dismisses as “insignificant,” adds to this burden. If we were to follow his advice and borrow $50 billion or more, future generations would inherit a mountain of debt, with little guarantee of corresponding economic returns.

Senator Ibrahim’s assertion that loans will be used exclusively for transformative infrastructure projects is, unfortunately, hard to believe. Nigeria’s history is littered with instances of poorly executed or abandoned projects despite hefty loans. The Ajaokuta Steel Plant, for instance, consumed billions of dollars over decades but has yet to deliver on its promise.

Without stringent safeguards, transparency, and accountability, there is no assurance that new loans will be used effectively. The senator’s call for legislative oversight and penalties for fund mismanagement is laudable, but Nigeria’s weak institutions and the politicization of oversight functions make such measures difficult to implement in practice.

Given the foregoing backdrop, it is germane to opine in this context that Nigeria should begin to look towards alternatives to Borrowing.   Rather than saddling the nation with more debt, Nigeria should prioritize harnessing its vast resources to generate revenue. The country boasts abundant natural resources, a large and youthful population, and untapped sectors like agriculture, technology, and renewable energy.

In fact, there is the need to expand revenue generation. Therefore, the government should focus on diversifying its revenue streams beyond crude oil. By investing in agriculture, manufacturing, and technology, Nigeria can create jobs and boost exports.

In a similar vein, there is the need to cut wasteful spending. This is as a significant portion of the nation’s revenue is lost to corruption, inefficiency, and excessive government spending. Reducing wasteful expenditures and plugging revenue leaks can free up funds for critical projects.

Also, instead of borrowing, the government should explore Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to fund infrastructure projects. PPPs have proven effective in many countries and can provide the necessary expertise and funding without burdening the nation with debt.

Also in a similar vein, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) should be encouraged. In fact, creating a conducive business environment can attract foreign investors, who can fund infrastructure projects and drive economic growth.

It is crucial to reflect on Nigeria’s borrowing history before embarking on another borrowing spree. The Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) of the 1980s, introduced under heavy borrowing conditions, left a legacy of economic hardship. The same pattern has repeated itself with recent loans, intended for development but diverted or mismanaged, leaving the masses worse off.

At this juncture, it is expedient to say a word to Senator Jimoh Ibrahim.  Oga Jimoh, while your intentions may be good, your proposal ignores the harsh realities of Nigeria’s economic and governance challenges. Borrowing “good money” is not a panacea; it is a recipe for chronic dependency if not paired with robust economic reforms and strict accountability measures.

Your comparison of Nigeria to Dubai overlooks the unique circumstances that made Dubai’s borrowing strategy successful. Nigeria cannot afford to gamble its future on a debt-driven model without first fixing its systemic issues.

Moreover, your suggestion that Nigeria negotiate debt forgiveness after accumulating more debt raises ethical and practical concerns. The global financial system is not a charity, and such an approach risks tarnishing the nation’s reputation and creditworthiness.

Nigeria’s path to economic prosperity lies not in reckless borrowing but in prudent financial management, strategic investments, and leveraging its immense human and natural resources. While infrastructure development is critical, it must be achieved sustainably without mortgaging the future.

Oga Jimoh, Nigeria does not need lessons in becoming a chronic debtor. What it needs are leaders who can think innovatively, act decisively, and prioritize the long-term well-being of the nation over short-term gains. The solutions to our economic challenges lie within us, not in the coffers of foreign creditors.

As Christmas 2024 approaches, many are filled with anxiety instead of anticipation. The economic challenges gripping the nation have left many wondering how they will celebrate the holiday. Rising prices, shrinking incomes, and increasing responsibilities create a perfect storm of worry. But in times like these, we are reminded of a profound truth: worrying achieves nothing.

Corrie ten Boom captured this beautifully when she said, “Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength.” Worry magnifies our challenges and blinds us to the blessings already at hand. For Christians, Christmas is more than a celebration; it is a reminder of God’s love and provision through the gift of Christ. This season, let us focus on faith, not fear, trusting in the One who has always been faithful.

Worry is as old as humanity, yet it remains as ineffective as ever. It thrives on uncertainty, exaggerating potential problems while robbing us of peace and joy. During the festive season, worry often centers on material needs: gifts, decorations, and elaborate meals.

However, worrying about what we cannot control serves no purpose. The Bible speaks clearly about the futility of worry. In Matthew 6:27, Jesus asks, “Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life?” The answer is obvious. Worry changes nothing about tomorrow; it only steals the joy and strength needed for today.

This year has been marked by economic challenges, and the Christmas season may feel like an added burden rather than a time of celebration. Families are questioning how to afford the festivities, and the thought of disappointing loved ones is causing anxiety.

But Christmas is not about material abundance; it is about the abundance of God’s love. The story of Christ’s birth in a humble manger is a powerful reminder that simplicity and faith are at the heart of the season. When we strip away the commercial trappings, we find that the true essence of Christmas is peace, hope, and joy, gifts that cannot be purchased.

At this juncture, it is not out of place to recall what the Bible says about Worry.  In fact, the Bible offers timeless wisdom on dealing with anxiety, particularly during challenging times. Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount is a treasure trove of guidance. In Matthew 6:25–34, He instructs us not to worry about what we will eat, drink, or wear. Instead, He calls us to trust in God’s provision, pointing to the birds of the air and the lilies of the field as examples of His care.

Jesus’ message is simple yet profound: “Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own” (Matthew 6:34). This call to live one day at a time is especially relevant during the holiday season.

“Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.”

While it is wise to plan for Christmas and be mindful of our financial situation, there is a difference between realistic concern and restless anxiety. Concern is rooted in the present, prompting us to take practical steps. Anxiety, however, is fixated on the future, dwelling on uncertainties and worst-case scenarios.

This distinction is crucial. Concern leads to action, budgeting, simplifying plans, or seeking creative ways to celebrate. Anxiety, on the other hand, leads to paralysis, robbing us of joy and productivity.

The Bible calls us to focus on today. God has placed us in the present moment, with the resources and opportunities needed for this day. The past is closed, and the future is under God’s control. Our role is to trust Him and steward the present wisely.

As we prepare for Christmas 2024, let us anchor our hearts in God’s promises. He has assured us of His faithfulness, even in the hardest times.

Against the backdrop of the foregoing view, consider these verses:  “Call upon Me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you shall glorify Me” (Psalm 50:15), “Cast your burden on the Lord, and He shall sustain you; He shall never permit the righteous to be moved” (Psalm 55:22),   and “Casting all your care upon Him, for He cares for you” (1 Peter 5:7).

These words remind us that God is not indifferent to our struggles. He sees, He cares, and He provides.

At this juncture, it is expedient to in this context familiarize you with practical steps to celebrate the oncoming Christmas without worry.

The first step is to simplify your celebration. This can be achieved by focusing on the meaning of Christmas, rather than material expectations. This is as simple acts of love and togetherness often create the most memorable moments.

In a similar vein, it expedient to set a realistic budget.  Plan within your means. Homemade gifts, shared meals, and creative decorations can be just as meaningful as expensive alternatives.

Not to be neglected is to pray about your needs. This can always be done by bringing your concerns to God in prayer, as well as trusting Him to provide what you need, and be open to seeing His provision in unexpected ways.

In a similar vein, prayerfully cultivate the attitude of gratitude. Reflect on the blessings you already have, from family and friends to health and faith. The reason for adopting the attitude of gratitude cannot be farfetched as it shifts our focus from lack to abundance.

Another step to take is to focus on giving. This is as true joy comes from giving, not receiving. Look for ways to bless others, even if it is through small gestures like a heartfelt note or a simple meal shared.

In fact, the true essence of Christmas is not found in lavish feasts or expensive gifts. It is found in the celebration of God’s greatest gift: the birth of Jesus Christ. The angels who announced His birth did not proclaim wealth or prosperity; they proclaimed peace and goodwill to all.

This season, let us return to the simplicity and wonder of that first Christmas. Whether we have much or little, we can find joy in God’s presence and the love we share with others.

Why worry about how 2024 Christmas will be celebrated when there is God? Worrying will not lower prices or increase income, but faith will sustain us through the challenges.  Remember the six words that can transform your mindset this season:  “Worry about nothing; pray about everything.”

As we prepare for the festivities, let us hold onto the peace that comes from trusting God. With Him, we have all we need to celebrate Christmas, not in material abundance, but in the richness of His love and grace.

It is no more news to announce that the Bola Tinubu-led Nigerian government recently sent a delegation to India to assess the safety and viability of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as an alternative fuel. However, this initiative has sparked controversy, not because of its purpose but due to the curious composition of the team sent for the task. Among those chosen were comedians and skit makers, including “Ola of Lagos” and Basketmouth. This decision has left not a few Nigerians questioning the seriousness of the government’s intentions and the direction of the country’s energy policy.

In a nation grappling with escalating transportation costs and the aftermath of subsidy removal, this choice of delegation has drawn ire across social media. Critics argue that by sidelining engineers, researchers, and experts in favor of entertainers, the government has undermined public trust in the credibility of its CNG policy.

India’s journey with CNG adoption offers a Masterclass in how to transition to alternative energy sources. Faced with alarming air pollution levels and an over-reliance on imported petroleum, India methodically introduced CNG as a sustainable alternative. This was achieved through a structured approach that cut across expert-driven implementation, infrastructure development, and public engagement.

To put explanatorily put the foregoing view, it is expedient to recall that India engaged engineers, environmental scientists, and energy policy specialists to spearhead its CNG rollout, even as research institutions conducted rigorous safety tests, ensuring public confidence in the new fuel.

Analyzed from the perspective of infrastructure development, before mandating CNG use, India invested heavily in pipelines, refueling stations, and vehicle conversion kits. This infrastructure minimized disruption for drivers and ensured accessibility.

Not only that, India embarked on robust and well-coordinated public engagement as all authorities in the country were compelled to conduct awareness campaigns, educating the populace on the benefits of CNG, even as incentives for vehicle conversions further boosted public acceptance.

Today, cities like Delhi boast extensive CNG networks that have reduced air pollution, saved costs, and set a benchmark for energy transitions.

Given the foregoing narrative, it is not out of place to opine that Nigeria’s CNG rollout: A Comedy of Errors?

In contrast, Nigeria’s approach has been marked by poor planning and, as critics argue, misplaced priorities. The decision to send comedians and skit makers to India for a safety assessment typifies a broader trend of trivializing critical policy issues.

As gathered from a news story titled, “Nigerians Kick As FG Sends Comedians, Skitmakers To India To Assess CNG Safety” dated, Thursday, 28 November 2024, and published on Reuben Abati news blog, social media erupted with reactions to the delegation, many of which were scathing. A user, @ourfavoriteonlinedoc, lamented, “They didn’t send professors of engineering. They didn’t send PhD researchers or MSc students from our best universities. They sent Ola of Lagos, who will come back just to roll on the floor and scream, ‘Put CNG in your car; you will love it.’ What a shame.”

Another user, @Arikeade, questioned the government’s preference for content creators over professionals, while @frankobaressi called the delegation emblematic of a leadership culture that defies logic. “This is what happens when touts handle the affairs of this nation,” he remarked.

In fact, the risks of neglecting expertise is costly. The uproar is not without basis. CNG, while celebrated for its affordability and environmental benefits, is not without risks. In Nigeria, concerns about the safety of CNG vehicles have grown following reported explosions. These incidents underscore the need for a meticulous safety assessment conducted by engineers and energy specialists, not entertainers.

Moreover, the optics of the government’s decision to send skit makers instead of technical experts weaken public confidence. Citizens question whether their leaders are genuinely committed to solving the country’s energy challenges or are merely staging another political performance.

However, irrespective of the uproar which the initiative has generated, particularly on social media platforms, the role of skit makers in national discourse cannot be pooh-poohed.

To be fair, skit makers and content creators hold significant influence in shaping public opinion, especially among younger demographics. Their inclusion in promotional campaigns could serve to popularize CNG adoption. However, sending them as the primary assessors of safety and quality raises serious questions about priorities and competence.

In fact, there is a clear distinction between leveraging influencers for public sensitization and tasking them with responsibilities that demand technical expertise. Nigeria’s decision to turn these roles into a show of comedy reflects a lack of strategic planning that could undermine the credibility of its CNG initiative.

Without a doubt, it is expedient we learn from India as it would unarguably serve as pathways for Nigeria.  In fact, if Nigeria hopes to replicate India’s success with CNG, it must prioritize expertise and infrastructure development, and it can be achieved by engaging professionals.

To the end of the foregoing, the government should involve engineers, energy specialists, and safety experts to conduct comprehensive assessments of CNG infrastructure and technology. Their findings will form the backbone of a credible rollout strategy.

In a similar vein, there is the need for Investment in Infrastructure. Without adequate pipelines, refueling stations, and conversion kits, the promise of affordable CNG will remain hollow. Nigeria must prioritize these investments to ensure accessibility for drivers nationwide.

Also, public awareness and incentives should not be ignored. Like India, Nigeria should conduct awareness campaigns highlighting the benefits and safety of CNG, even as offering subsidies for vehicle conversions could also encourage adoption.

Given the foregoing, it is expedient to note that skit makers and influencers can play a valuable role in educating the public, but their involvement should be limited to outreach efforts, not technical assessments.

In fact, the backlash against the government’s choice of delegation reflects broader frustrations with Nigeria’s governance. For many citizens, the decision symbolizes a pattern of misplaced priorities and disregard for expertise.

Also, the transition to CNG holds immense potential to reduce transportation costs, curb pollution, and diversify Nigeria’s energy portfolio. However, realizing this potential requires leadership that values competence over theatrics.

Without a doubt, Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The decision to send comedians and skit makers to assess CNG safety may be a moment of levity, but it also underscores the critical need for a paradigm shift in governance. To build a sustainable energy future, Nigeria must learn from India’s playbook: prioritize expertise, invest in infrastructure, and engage the public meaningfully.

Until then, the joke may very well be on us, a nation that has yet to decide whether it is serious about progress or content to laugh at its own missteps.

Balthazar Ebang Engonga, the nephew of Equatorial Guinea’s long-serving President Teodoro Obiang, has been acquitted by the country’s Supreme Court after facing a high-profile case involving intimate videos that made waves, both locally and internationally. The court’s ruling, which dismissed all charges against Mr. Engonga, was grounded on the lack of evidence to support the allegations, as well as the assertion that all parties involved in the videos were consenting adults.

This case first attracted attention after compromising footage of Mr. Engonga surfaced online, sparking a media frenzy. The court’s ruling brought clarity to the situation, stating that medical tests confirmed there was no transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, further cementing Engonga’s claim of innocence. However, beyond the acquittal, the case has brought to light broader issues surrounding privacy, consent, accountability, and the implications of the digital era on personal and professional lives.

The release of intimate videos of public figures is a frequent topic of discussion in today’s digital world, where personal lives are often exposed without permission. The leak of videos involving Mr. Engonga was no different, attracting significant media coverage and public attention. The nature of the videos was compromising, and the shockwaves reverberated far beyond Equatorial Guinea, drawing international scrutiny. As the videos spread on various platforms, they became a spectacle, fueling gossip and speculation about the private lives of the individuals involved.

Despite the sensationalism of the situation, Mr. Engonga has maintained that the individuals shown in the videos were consenting adults. The Supreme Court, in its judgment, supported this assertion, and the ruling emphasized the lack of any evidence to suggest non-consensual behavior. Medical tests were also conducted, which proved that there were no sexually transmitted diseases involved in the case, further supporting Mr. Engonga’s defense.

However, the public’s reaction to the videos did not stop at the question of consent. In an unexpected twist, several married men whose wives appeared in the footage expressed gratitude to Mr. Engonga. These men explained that the videos had revealed hidden aspects of their marital lives, prompting some to seek divorce. This development is a stark reflection of the complexities of modern relationships and the role that privacy, trust, and transparency play in marriage.

For many, the case became more than just a scandal involving a public figure, it became a symbol of the digital age’s power to expose even the most intimate corners of our lives. The internet, which has the potential to connect and inform, can also serve as a tool for destruction, often without regard for the emotional consequences.

In response to the leak, Mr. Engonga has vowed to take legal action against those responsible for disseminating the videos. He described the leak as a serious violation of his privacy, one that has caused significant emotional distress to his family. His wife, in particular, was deeply affected by the ordeal, as were many of the other people featured in the footage. The emotional toll that such an invasion of privacy takes on individuals is often underestimated. In Mr. Engonga’s case, it not only impacted his personal life but also his professional reputation and the public’s perception of him.

The issue of privacy in the digital age is complex, as the boundaries between public and private life are increasingly blurred. While public figures often have their personal lives scrutinized, the leak of private content without consent raises ethical questions. Who owns the right to one’s personal data, and what happens when that data is shared without permission? The actions of those who leaked the videos, and the subsequent viral spread of the footage, pose critical questions about accountability and the ethics of digital content sharing.

In many ways, this case highlights the difficulty of navigating the online space, where personal information is often treated as currency and privacy is viewed as a luxury. As social media platforms and online spaces become more pervasive, the consequences of sharing intimate content without consent are far-reaching. The damage done to individuals’ lives is not just legal but deeply personal, affecting their families, relationships, and mental well-being.

Before the scandal, Mr. Engonga was known for his role as the head of the National Financial Investigation Agency (ANIF) in Equatorial Guinea. In this capacity, he worked to combat financial crimes such as money laundering and illicit financial flows. He was seen as a key figure in the fight against corruption, particularly in a country where transparency and accountability in government finances have long been concerns.

However, after his arrest on October 25, 2024, allegations surfaced that he had embezzled substantial amounts of state funds, hiding them in offshore accounts. These allegations added an additional layer of complexity to an already controversial case. Despite being publicly accused of financial crimes, Mr. Engonga has not yet addressed these charges in public, leaving much to be speculated about the true nature of the case. His arrest brought him into the crosshairs of both his critics and supporters, leading to questions about his professional conduct and the personal scandal that followed.

The combination of his work in law enforcement and his personal indiscretions has raised eyebrows, particularly given the increasing attention on corruption within the government. His arrest and the subsequent revelations about his private life have cast a shadow on his professional reputation, forcing people to question the integrity of individuals in positions of power.

After his arrest, Mr. Engonga was imprisoned in Malabo’s infamous Black Beach prison, a facility notorious for its harsh conditions and its treatment of political opponents. Black Beach prison has long been associated with human rights abuses, with numerous reports documenting the mistreatment of detainees, particularly those viewed as enemies of the government. The prison has become a symbol of the oppressive nature of the country’s justice system, which has drawn international condemnation over the years.

For Mr. Engonga, his imprisonment in Malabo’s infamous Black Beach prison was a traumatic experience that only added to the already complicated nature of his case. The brutal conditions of the prison have been documented in multiple reports, with former detainees recounting instances of physical abuse, torture, and inadequate medical care. The prison has become a focal point in discussions about the government’s treatment of those it deems a threat, further fueling skepticism about the fairness of the country’s legal system.

One of the most striking aspects of this case is how technology, particularly the internet and social media, has played a central role in the unfolding drama. The leak of the intimate videos and their subsequent virality on social platforms demonstrated the immense power that digital content holds. While technology has made information more accessible and communication more instantaneous, it has also raised ethical questions about the sharing of private content without consent.

The ease with which personal videos and photos can be shared in the digital era has led to an explosion of online content, much of which is not intended for public consumption. The unintended consequences of this are vast, and they often include emotional distress, reputational damage, and legal ramifications for those involved. The sharing of intimate content, whether for revenge, profit, or entertainment, has become an all-too-common occurrence, and the impact it has on the lives of those affected cannot be underestimated.

As a society, we must reckon with the ethics of digital content sharing and its consequences. While freedom of speech and access to information are fundamental rights, they should not come at the expense of an individual’s right to privacy and dignity. The case of Balthazar Ebang Engonga serves as a stark reminder of how quickly personal information can be weaponized, and how the digital world can invade our private spaces in ways that are both harmful and irreversible.

This case highlights several critical issues surrounding consent, privacy, and accountability in the digital age. It also underscores the need for stronger legal frameworks to protect individuals in an era where the boundaries between the private and public spheres are increasingly difficult to define. In particular, it calls attention to the dangers of sharing intimate content online and the emotional toll that such invasions of privacy can have on those involved.

The actions of those responsible for leaking the videos, coupled with the wider public reaction, show how digital media can reshape our understanding of consent and accountability. As the world becomes more connected through the internet, it is essential that we address the ethical and legal implications of digital content sharing. The case of Mr. Engonga is a poignant reminder of the power of technology in modern society, and the importance of respecting privacy in an increasingly transparent world.

This incident may have concluded with an acquittal, but the broader questions it raises about consent, privacy, and accountability in the digital age are far from settled. As we continue to navigate the complexities of the online world, it is vital that we remain vigilant in safeguarding the rights and dignity of individuals, both in their personal and professional lives.

When news broke that the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) had published a list of 9,532 alleged land title defaulters, including heavyweights like former Nigerian Head of State Ibrahim Babangida (IBB), it did not take long for discussions to circle around the interplay of power, influence, and the game of land politics in Nigeria. The inclusion of IBB, one of Nigeria’s most astute political figures, in a list of debtors owing ₦152 million for a plot in Asokoro, sent shockwaves through the political corridors of Abuja, raising one intriguing question: “Shey Wike think say e go fit dribble Maradona?”

This line of inquiry, coming from a colleague in the office, plays on a larger political conversation, whether Barrister Nyesom Wike, former Governor of Rivers State, and currently the minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), known for his political sharpness, could truly outmaneuver IBB, who, in his heyday, earned the moniker “Maradona” for his political sagacity. IBB’s deft maneuvers on the political field were legendary, and as the news of his alleged debt circulated, it was easy to see how the dynamics of power and influence in Nigeria’s political landscape could be at play in this seemingly mundane land dispute.

Ibrahim Babangida, Nigeria’s military ruler from 1985 to 1993, is no stranger to political intrigue. His tenure, marked by both controversy and skillful maneuvering, set the stage for him to be a political kingmaker long after his time in office. Known for his ability to play rival factions against each other, IBB’s name has remained synonymous with political power broking in Nigeria. It is not an overstatement to suggest that IBB’s influence still looms large, especially in the corridors of power where alliances and rivalries are constantly shifting.

So, when the FCTA named IBB among the defaulters for a ₦152 million debt on land in Asokoro, the first thought might be: Is this an attempt to bring down a figure as influential as Maradona? The FCTA’s move to expose such a prominent figure is unusual, considering the history of political protection and patronage that surrounds Nigeria’s elite. Land, particularly in Abuja, is not just a matter of real estate; it is a symbol of power, status, and influence.

What makes this more interesting is the timing. Governor Wike, a man known for his combative political style and ability to challenge the status quo, has been rising in political prominence. His recent activities, especially his push for reforms and changes in political alignments, seem to coincide with this new wave of land titling scrutiny. Could this be a subtle way for Wike to assert his dominance over Nigeria’s power structures? Could he be trying to check Maradona’s seemingly untouchable status, leveraging this land debt to his advantage?

Governor Nyesom Wike is a seasoned political player, particularly in the volatile world of Nigerian state politics. His reputation for being direct, tough, and unyielding in his approach has earned him both admirers and enemies. Wike’s penchant for challenging entrenched political interests has made him a figure to watch, especially as he moves into the national political stage with an eye on greater influence.

The ongoing tussle between Wike and some political elites has been brewing for some time. Wike’s influence is undeniable, particularly in the Niger Delta region, but his recent moves show a man eager to expand his national reach. His confrontations with federal government policies, his vocal support for opposition parties, and his strategic positioning in the aftermath of the 2023 elections all point to his desire to reshape the political order. In that light, the question of whether Wike could “dribble” IBB, who is, after all, the man who has maneuvered around Nigeria’s political landscape for decades, is both timely and intriguing.

Wike’s confrontational style may suggest that he is testing the waters with his political rivals. The publication of IBB’s alleged land debt could be part of a larger strategy of political positioning, one where Wike seeks to challenge the perceived invincibility of the old guard. By targeting landholders like IBB, Wike might be sending a subtle message that no one is above scrutiny, not even Nigeria’s most seasoned political players.

Land in Nigeria is more than just property, it is a symbol of wealth, power, and influence. The recent naming of top political figures as defaulters by the FCTA signals that land title disputes, especially in the capital, are closely tied to the intricate webs of Nigerian politics. As Abuja has grown into the heart of Nigeria’s political and administrative activities, land ownership in the city has become a marker of one’s proximity to power. A plot of land in Asokoro, for example, is not just real estate; it is literarily a seat at the table of political elites.

For IBB, who once held absolute power in Nigeria, land ownership in Abuja is a status symbol, something that reflects both his past political dominance and ongoing influence. However, the fact that his name appeared on the list of defaulters raises questions. Could it be that there is a larger political maneuver behind it? Perhaps the timing is not coincidental; perhaps it is an attempt to chip away at his legacy and influence.

The question that lingers is whether Wike, with his recent political endeavors, can truly outplay IBB in this game of political chess. IBB’s reputation as a master of realpolitik suggests that any move against him is unlikely to go unnoticed. Maradona’s ability to navigate Nigeria’s complex political terrain is well-documented; his alliances and machinations are often subtle, yet highly effective.

If  Wike indeed sees this as an opportunity to undermine IBB’s influence, it would not be the first time he has taken on formidable political figures. Wike has consistently demonstrated an ability to rally public opinion and apply pressure in ways that force even the most established players to reconsider their strategies. However, challenging IBB is no small feat. The former Head of State is known for his networks, his ability to play the long game, and his capacity to keep his political cards close to his chest.

The fact that prominent figures like IBB are part of the FCTA’s land defaulter list suggests that no one is immune from scrutiny, no matter how powerful. But whether this move will diminish IBB’s stature or simply fuel his political survival instincts remains to be seen.

The unfolding land title dispute in the Federal Capital Territory is more than just a case of defaulters and overdue payments. It is a reflection of the larger struggle for power in Nigerian politics. Wike, known for his combative and strategic nature, may very well be attempting to make a move against one of Nigeria’s most skilled powerbrokers. However, IBB’s decades of political experience, combined with his vast network, suggest that he will not go down without a fight.

As the FCTA’s ultimatum looms, the game of political maneuvering continues, and the outcome remains uncertain. One thing is clear: in Nigerian politics, nothing is as it seems, and every move is part of a larger chess game where only the most astute players can survive. Will Wike be able to outmaneuver Maradona? Time will tell. But in Nigerian politics, as in the world of football, anything is possible.

Journalism holds a powerful position in society. It informs, educates, and serves as a vital check on power. Yet, despite its role as a cornerstone of democracy, journalism is not without its ethical dilemmas, especially for those who seek to balance their faith with their professional responsibilities. At the heart of this conflict lies the tension between two distinct approaches to journalism: developmental journalism and adversarial journalism. Each has its own set of challenges, and each places journalists at a crossroads, forcing them to choose between truth and duty.

For Christians, the call to truth is non-negotiable. Scripture teaches that truth is central to faith and practice (Exodus 20:16), a principle that all Christians strive to uphold. But for journalists, truth becomes entangled in a web of professional pressures, editorial choices, and expectations from both the public and government. While journalists are tasked with reporting the truth, the realities of the profession, just like that of lawyers, often compel them to compromise, creating a tension that many find difficult to navigate.

Developmental journalism, a model that seeks to highlight national achievements and foster growth, demands a specific narrative. Practitioners of developmental journalism are often asked to paint a rosier picture than reality might suggest, sometimes even portraying the nation’s economy as thriving despite evidence to the contrary. In a country grappling with economic challenges, for instance, journalists who adopt this model might be expected to emphasize growth and stability, even when the facts tell a different story.

This expectation is not limited to journalists alone. Just as Davido, a popular Nigerian singer, has recently been labeled for his comments during an interview in America, the pressure to present a certain narrative can transcend professions. During his interview, Davido was seemingly accused of not portraying Nigeria to be in state of Eldorado. Some critics suggested that his global platform should have been used to speak more glowingly about the state of the nation. Similarly, journalists following the developmental model are sometimes expected to echo a version of national success, even when such a narrative risks obscuring pressing social and economic issues. The case of Davido highlights a broader tendency to demand loyalty to a polished, often idealized portrayal of national progress, at the cost of confronting uncomfortable truths.

But this model comes with ethical implications. For journalists of faith, presenting misleading or partial truths raises difficult moral questions. Can one genuinely say the economy is thriving when so many are struggling? Can a journalist faithfully report on the benefits of government policies when the public is not experiencing those benefits?

In this context, journalists are often caught in a dilemma: do they fulfill their duty to support national development, or do they uphold their ethical commitment to truth? When speaking the truth might harm national pride or image, the answer is not always clear.

On the other hand, there are adversarial journalists, those who view their role as standing apart from the powers that be and holding them to account. These journalists are willing to expose the truth, even when it risks damaging the reputation of government officials, powerful corporations, or society as a whole. Their job is to uncover corruption, report on injustice, and speak out when the system fails.

From an ethical standpoint, adversarial journalism aligns more closely with Christian principles. The Bible calls for justice and righteousness (Isaiah 1:17), and many adversarial journalists see their work as fulfilling this divine mandate. They understand that sometimes, exposing uncomfortable truths is necessary for the greater good. By reporting on societal wrongs, they hope to provoke change and bring about accountability.

However, the path of the adversarial journalist is fraught with danger. Adversarial journalism can cost a reporter his or her career, freedom, or even his or her life. In authoritarian regimes or politically charged environments, journalists who refuse to tow the official line often face retaliation. In less extreme cases, journalists working for media outlets owned by the government, or sympathetic to it, may find their careers stifled or their jobs at risk.

For those in government-controlled media, taking an adversarial stance can be akin to professional suicide. The pressure to conform to the government’s narrative can be overwhelming, and any journalist who dares to speak out may find himself or herself marginalized or fired. In this environment, speaking the truth becomes a dangerous game, where the stakes are higher than simply reporting facts.

The dilemma faced by journalists is not unique to the media industry. In many professions, individuals are often forced to balance personal values with professional requirements. But in journalism, this conflict is particularly acute. Journalists must decide whether to prioritize their professional duty to inform the public or adhere to the ethical principles of honesty and integrity. For instance, what kind of reportage is expected from a journalist who has been promised an advertisement space?

The cost of this compromise can be steep. Journalists who choose developmental journalism over adversarial reporting may find themselves compromised by a system that encourages the distortion of facts for the sake of national unity or pecuniary gain. Those who opt for the adversarial path may risk their careers, reputation, or even personal safety.

For Christian journalists, the decision is even more profound. Their faith calls them to truthfulness and integrity in all aspects of life. But the very nature of journalism often forces them to choose between doing what is right and doing what is professionally expedient.

The dilemma is not just about ethics but about survival. Can one remain faithful to Christian principles in a profession that sometimes rewards deceit or silence? Can a journalist navigate the tension between personal integrity and professional duty without losing his or her soul?

Be that as it may, the expediency of striking a balance between faith and professionalism is not negotiable.

In fact, the key to navigating this dilemma lies in balance. Journalists can, and should, adhere to ethical guidelines that prioritize truthfulness, fairness, and transparency. The practice of journalism must always be rooted in integrity, even if it means going against the grain. But journalists also need to be strategic in their approach, especially when dealing with powerful interests.

Adversarial journalism, while important, should be practiced with care. While it is crucial to hold power to account, it is also important to provide context, avoid sensationalism, and seek constructive solutions. Likewise, developmental journalism can be a powerful tool for promoting national growth, or protecting the interest of an organization where a media house has a pecuniary interest, but it must not be used as an excuse to ignore systemic issues or suppress critical voices.

For Christian journalists, the answer is clear: Truth must always be the foundation of their work. However, they must also be mindful of the consequences of their reporting and the ethical dilemmas that arise. Journalism, like any other profession, particularly the law profession, is not without its compromises. But by adhering to a strong moral framework and seeking guidance from their faith, journalists can navigate the difficult terrain between truth and duty.

Journalism, in all its forms, demands that its practitioners confront ethical crossroads on a daily basis. The choice between developmental journalism and adversarial journalism represents a profound moral dilemma for those who seek to stay true to their profession while adhering to their faith. But the ethical challenge goes deeper than the question of which path to follow; it is about finding the courage to remain truthful, even when the consequences are steep.

For Christian journalists, the question is not just about what they report, but how they report it. Can they be faithful to their calling as truth-tellers, even when the truth is uncomfortable? Can they navigate the treacherous waters of professional compromise without sacrificing their integrity? In the end, the answer lies in their commitment to the principles of truth, justice, and righteousness, a commitment that must guide every decision they make, both as journalists and as people of faith.

President Bola Tinubu’s visit to France reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to deepening bilateral ties and attracting investment in critical economic sectors.

This high-profile visit comes as 2024 half-year foreign trade data highlights France as Nigeria’s sixth-largest trading partner, with total trade volumes at N4.4 trillion.

Notably, exports to France stood at N3.4 trillion, making it Nigeria’s largest single-country export destination and second only to Africa as a region.

In a high-profile meeting at the historic Palais des L’Elysée, President Tinubu and his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, explored avenues to strengthen their economic and diplomatic ties.

Tinubu outlined an ambitious agenda focusing on key areas of collaboration, aimed at unlocking Nigeria’s untapped potential and fostering mutual prosperity.

Nairametrics research highlights the ten key areas of economic partnership President Tinubu sought to strengthen during his visit to France, aimed at fostering mutual growth and unlocking Nigeria’s vast economic potential.

1. Agricultural Development and Food Security

President Tinubu called for French investment to bolster Nigeria’s agricultural productivity, emphasizing food security as a top priority. He noted:

“The French-Nigeria Business Forum is doing a lot already, but we need to do more on food security. We cannot help but invest in another’s country. It is our responsibility to put together a food security program for the private sector to come and invest in the country.”

Tinubu highlighted Nigeria’s flourishing financial sector as a catalyst for foreign investments in agriculture. He assured:

“Nigeria’s financial sector is evolving and flourishing. We are also creating grounds for investment in Nigeria’s economy for French nationals, especially in the area of food security.”

Nigeria’s financial services sector recorded a GDP growth rate of 30.83% in the third quarter of 2024 boosting overall GDP growth rate to 3.46%

2. Solid Minerals Exploration

The President invited French investors to explore opportunities in Nigeria’s underdeveloped solid minerals sector. He emphasized de-risking the sector for easier investment:

“We should de-risk the opportunities in the solid minerals. We have the potentials and we have agreed on a deeper and deeper relationship.”

An agreement was signed during the visit, signaling increased French commitment to the sector.

Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria’s mining sector is set to become a key driver of economic diversification and growth.

• The administration aims to modernize the Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act to attract global investors, ensure environmental sustainability, and improve community welfare.
• Key initiatives include developing infrastructure to support mining operations, combating illegal mining through a dedicated Mining Marshal Corps, and fostering human capital development through training and research programs.
• To boost foreign investment, incentives like tax waivers and security reforms have been introduced, alongside efforts to mandate local mineral processing and revoke dormant licenses.

3. Youth Development and Training

Tinubu stressed the importance of equipping Nigeria’s youthful population with skills through French-backed training initiatives. He stated:

“I can assure you that Nigeria is open for business. We have a vibrant youth population that is educated and ready to be trained in various areas of entrepreneurship and development.”

Tinubu requested specific programs aimed at building the entrepreneurial capacities of Nigerian youths.

4. Energy Transition

The President urged French companies to collaborate with Nigeria in its drive toward cleaner energy solutions while maximizing existing resources.

• While not directly quoted in this sector, Tinubu’s broader remarks about foreign investments in critical areas aligned with Nigeria’s energy priorities.
• Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria’s energy transition plan aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060 while ensuring economic growth and energy access.
• The strategy focuses on decarbonizing key sectors: power, cooking, oil and gas, transport, and industry.
• Initiatives include increasing renewable energy contributions, promoting clean cooking technologies, and adopting natural gas as a transitional fuel.

The government is also investing in infrastructure, such as compressed natural gas (CNG) stations, to provide affordable alternatives to petrol and reduce transportation costs. International partnerships, like the agreement with Germany on wind energy development, support these efforts.

5. Blue Economy and Fisheries

Tinubu highlighted the opportunities in Nigeria’s untapped blue economy, particularly in fisheries, citing Lagos as an example of effective resource management:

“In Lagos, we have tamed the Atlantic Ocean. For us, fishery is an important aspect of investment.”

He encouraged French investors to explore these prospects, assuring:

“We want to assure the French investment community that Nigeria is open for business. It shall be easy in, and easy out.”

Under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Nigeria is prioritizing the development of its blue economy to stimulate economic growth and sustainability.

• The administration is focusing on enhancing maritime security through initiatives like the Deep Blue Project, which has significantly reduced piracy in Nigerian waters and the Gulf of Guinea.
• Collaborations with regional partners aim to address maritime insecurity comprehensively.

6. Security Cooperation

Acknowledging global security challenges, Tinubu called for collaborative measures to combat terrorism and reduce migration pressures. He stated:

“Nigeria is a partner in progress. We are ready to partner with France so that we can have security operations that will stop the challenge of migration.”

7. Education and Child Welfare

Tinubu emphasized the importance of child education and welfare as a cornerstone for national development. He noted:

“A starved nation will not care about weather or environment, and in the 21st century, no child should go to bed hungry.”

Proposing solutions, he said:

“If an African child is given a glass of milk in a class, there will be no problem in getting him to return and stay in school to learn. The more educated the children are, the better it is for us.”

8. Defense and Technology

In discussions on defense, Tinubu sought advanced technology solutions to address security threats and enhance Nigeria’s defense capabilities. He emphasized the shared responsibility of governments to ensure regional stability.

9. Support for Creative Industries

President Macron praised Nigeria’s creative industries as a growth engine and pledged France’s support. Tinubu encouraged deeper collaboration in promoting Nigerian art, music, and film globally, as part of broader youth-focused initiatives.

10. Trade and Investment Ease

Tinubu reaffirmed Nigeria’s openness to business and reassured potential French investors of a friendly operating environment:

“We are working on stability and we are getting closer and closer, but we can do better and better.”

He emphasized ongoing reforms to simplify trade and encourage foreign direct investment, stating:

“I can assure you that Nigeria is open for business.”

Macron’s Commitment to Strengthened Ties

President Emmanuel Macron described Tinubu’s visit as a landmark in bilateral relations, applauding his leadership and vision:

“You are the great leader of the great country in Africa. We appreciate your visionary leadership and energy in transforming the economy of your country.”

Macron pledged to expand cooperation, especially in solid minerals and youth development, emphasizing that global challenges require collaborative solutions:

“We have confidence that you, Mr. President, will reinforce our relationship with Nigeria, and it will cover the West Coast region, with ECOWAS playing the leading role.”

 [Nairametrics]

The operational capacity of the recently rehabilitated Port Harcourt Refining Company faced significant scrutiny on Thursday.

Allegations surfaced that petroleum products loaded from the facility on Tuesday were not newly refined but were, instead, products stored in its tanks for over three years. 

This situation has reignited skepticism surrounding the refinery, which has experienced repeated delays and missed deadlines, with seven failed attempts to resume operations.

Timothy Mgbere, Secretary of the Alesa community stakeholders, claimed during a Thursday interview that the refinery’s 60,000 barrels per day capacity is far from being fully operational, contradicting the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s (NNPCL) assertions.

The Alesa community, located in Eleme, Rivers State, hosts the Port Harcourt refinery.

Mgbere alleged that only six trucks of petroleum products were loaded on Tuesday, despite NNPCL’s claim that 200 trucks would be dispatched daily.

He further highlighted that the ceremony marking the plant’s reopening was largely symbolic, stating that full operations had not commenced.

Industry experts have called on NNPCL to substantiate its claims by selling products directly to oil marketers. However, NNPCL spokesperson Femi Soneye declined to respond to inquiries on the matter.

The refinery resumed operations on Tuesday after years of inactivity. NNPCL stated that the revamped complex of the old refinery operates at 70% of its installed capacity, producing diesel, Pour Fuel Oil, and other petroleum products. According to NNPCL, the facility is expected to release 200 trucks of petrol daily into the Nigerian market.

However, Mgbere described the reopening event as a superficial showcase, adding that not all units of the old complex are functional. He insisted that what was presented to the public does not reflect the reality on the ground.

Mgbere further criticized the refinery’s automation claims, stating that inefficiencies remain evident.

He also accused the contractor of incompetence, pointing out that the project was heavily reliant on subcontractors, many of whom lacked the required equipment.

He said, “The Port Harcourt refinery, and by extension, the Port Harcourt depot, happens to be the mainstay of the Alesa community economy. The economic activities emanating from the operations of these depots mean a lot to us as a community people, but as it were, now, I don’t think it’s a cause for celebration yet because what we are having in the media space is different from what we have on the ground.

“I can tell you on authority as a community person, that what happened on Tuesday was just a mere show at the Port Harcourt depot. A mere show in the sense that the Port Harcourt refinery, we call it area five, that is the old refinery, is merely in skeletal operation. When I say skeletal, I mean that some units of the refinery were brought up and are running, but not the entire unit of the old refinery is functional, as we speak.

“I will give them the credit that at least they have started something, but not to say, according to the Head of Corporate Communication, Femi Soneye, like it is in the media that they are already producing 1.4m barrels per day. That’s not the case. That’s not true. I don’t want to use the word lie, but as an agency that is holding the oil industry in trust for Nigerians, they shouldn’t put out information that is not true.”

He argued that “the true picture of what happened on Tuesday is that the NNPC has been under pressure to televise to Nigerians that everything is okay and that the old refinery has started functioning.

“I can tell you that the MD or the CEO of the refinery, was in Port Harcourt since Monday; the other MDs were also in Port Harcourt. The MD of Port Harcourt refinery and those heading the operations department didn’t sleep through the night of Monday to Tuesday because of the whole event they had on Tuesday.

“What is the true picture? The Old Port Harcourt refinery is built with its utilities, different from the new complex. The tank farm that is servicing the Old Port Harcourt refinery has a different loading gantry at the depot.”

Continuing, he said, “The party they had on Tuesday was held at the new loading gantry that is directly connected to the new refinery. And so, how does that work? It is impossible. The feedstock storage facility for the old refinery had some stock, old stock that has been there for over three years.

“And so what they did was to release that stock, and then loaded six trucks and then televised it to Nigerians that it is the production from the old refinery. That’s not true. And so I like Nigerians to know the truth, but they don’t need to believe me, because Nigerians, no matter how you paint the true pictures to them, they get sentimental. They get tribalistic. They want to whip some sentiment and all that the product that was loaded. But let it be on record that it was only six trucks that they used to calibrate the new loading gantry. The product was not a new refined product from the old refinery.”

Energy experts echoed Mgbere’s concerns, urging NNPCL to disclose the source of its feedstock and the state of its distillation points.

Bala Zaka, an energy consultant, questioned why products were being stored rather than immediately released to the market, arguing that such practices increase costs unnecessarily.

He said in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, “Generally, when a company produces a product regardless of the type or time, whether it is biscuit or toilet rolls. The first thing you do immediately when products come out of production is to send them to the market. You send them out to customers.