As Nigeria continues to grapple with the ripple effects of economic mismanagement, inflation, and rising poverty, all eyes are now on President Bola Tinubu’s expected cabinet reshuffle. Speculation is widespread that his administration is poised to make critical decisions, potentially rejigging his cabinet, unarguably for a more result-oriented performance. This move offers a unique opportunity for the president to demonstrate his commitment to Nigeria’s economic revival. However, if this reshuffle follows the same path of patronage-based appointments that prioritize political loyalty over merit, it will signal that this government has chosen to sideline competence in favor of vested interests. Tinubu’s legacy as a leader determined to restore Nigeria’s economic glory hinges on his ability to rise above the narrow confines of patronage politics.

In the face of deep economic challenges, the time has come for President Tinubu to make bold choices that prioritize expertise, knowledge, and proven leadership over political loyalties. These decisions should be aimed not just at improving Nigeria’s economic landscape but also at strengthening his political stature and legacy. If the president can successfully steer the country through these turbulent times by appointing individuals who are well-equipped to navigate Nigeria’s complex socio-economic realities, he will earn the respect of not just his political base but the wider Nigerian population and international observers alike.

The reason for the foregoing view cannot be farfetched as Nigeria has long been mired in a political culture where appointments are made based on loyalty rather than competence. This has led to the emergence of a bureaucratic elite, often out of touch with the struggles of ordinary Nigerians. While it is tempting for any leader to reward loyal supporters with positions of power, such appointments often come at the expense of national progress. Patronage-based appointments have been at the heart of Nigeria’s governance problem, contributing to a cycle of inefficiency, corruption, and economic stagnation. Political appointees focused on advancing personal or group interests often lack the foresight, skill, or will to tackle the country’s mounting problems head-on.

President Tinubu, a seasoned politician, must recognize that this cycle is not only unsustainable but also dangerous for Nigeria’s future. The country is in dire need of reforms, especially in key sectors like power, education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These reforms require skilled technocrats with the vision and expertise to implement long-term, sustainable policies, not political loyalists with little experience or knowledge of governance.

Nigeria is currently dealing with a myriad of economic challenges that cannot be addressed by mere political calculations. Inflation is eroding the purchasing power of the average Nigerian, food insecurity is on the rise, unemployment is at an all-time high, and foreign investment is dwindling. These are not problems that can be solved by political rhetoric; they demand innovative solutions grounded in sound economic policies and the ability to execute them effectively.

For Tinubu, who campaigned on promises of economic reform and transformation, the time to make good on those promises is now. If he reshuffles his cabinet based on competence and merit, the positive effects on the economy could be immediate. For instance, appointing a seasoned economist with a track record of success to the Ministry of Finance could help stabilize the economy, build investor confidence, and guide Nigeria through its debt restructuring. Similarly, bringing in professionals with vast experience in energy could help address Nigeria’s long-standing power generation problems, which continue to stifle industrial growth and development.

Appointing qualified and competent individuals is not just an economic necessity, it is a political strategy that could enhance Tinubu’s standing both within Nigeria and internationally. By doing so, Tinubu will demonstrate that his government is serious about fixing the economy and addressing the concerns of ordinary Nigerians, thereby gaining widespread support from across the political spectrum.

Beyond economic benefits, a cabinet reshuffle based on merit could help foster national unity in a country often divided along ethnic, regional, and religious lines. By moving away from appointments that cater to specific political factions or ethnic groups, Tinubu can send a powerful message that his administration is focused on governing for all Nigerians, not just a privileged few. This is crucial for nation-building, especially in a country as diverse and complex as Nigeria.

Tinubu’s government has a rare opportunity to bridge the nation’s divides by appointing individuals from across different backgrounds based on their competence and contribution to national development. This approach would not only build trust between the government and the governed but also lay the foundation for a more inclusive political culture.

In the long run, Tinubu’s political legacy will be shaped by the decisions he makes now. If his administration can deliver tangible results by surrounding itself with capable, knowledgeable, and experienced individuals, his name will be remembered as a leader who rose above the politics of patronage to deliver for the Nigerian people. On the other hand, if the reshuffle follows the same path of political patronage that has plagued past administrations, his government risks being remembered as one that squandered an opportunity for meaningful change.

The stakes are high, and Tinubu must choose wisely. He must understand that in the context of Nigeria’s current economic crisis, appointing the wrong individuals to key positions could result in further hardship for the Nigerian people, increased disillusionment with his administration, and political fallout that could jeopardize his broader reform agenda. However, by making appointments based on merit, he stands a better chance of not only revitalizing the economy but also positioning himself as a statesman who put the country first.

Tinubu’s political capital will not grow simply by rewarding loyalists. On the contrary, the only way to enrich his political stature is to show that his leadership transcends the narrow interests of his political allies. A leader who demonstrates a commitment to the collective welfare of the nation will always enjoy broader support, even from opposition quarters. If Tinubu can usher in a new era of merit-based appointments, his administration will earn the respect of Nigerians and the international community, thus boosting his credibility and giving him the political leverage needed to implement even more

By surrounding himself with technocrats and experts, Tinubu can also send a message that his government values competence, professionalism, and efficiency. This would go a long way in restoring the faith of the Nigerian people in their leadership and could even inspire future leaders to follow the same path of prioritizing merit over patronage.

As the Tinubu-led administration prepares for a cabinet reshuffle, the president faces a critical choice: continue the tradition of political patronage, or break from the past and embrace a merit-based approach to appointments. Nigeria’s economy, political stability, and future prosperity hinge on this decision. By appointing qualified, experienced, and capable individuals to key positions, Tinubu can revitalize the nation’s economy, foster national unity, and secure his political legacy as a leader who rose above the politics of patronage for the betterment of Nigeria.

For the sake of Nigeria’s future and his own political survival, President Tinubu must make the right choice. The country can no longer afford appointments driven by political loyalty over merit. The time has come for a new era of governance, one where competence, professionalism, and national interest take precedence over all else.

The ongoing friction between Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, has captured the attention of the nation, sparking conversations about loyalty, governance, and the personal dynamics that often shape political landscapes. As both men engage in what appears to be a test of political strength, the question arises: “Will Wike no longer be Wike, or Fubara no longer be Fubara if they choose to shield their swords and focus on the greater good?”

Wike, the charismatic former governor and now a prominent figure in Nigeria’s political arena, has a reputation for his assertiveness and political dexterity. Fubara, on the other hand, was once seen as Wike’s political protégé, rising to the governorship largely due to Wike’s influence. However, their relationship, which seemed rock-solid during the campaign period, has grown increasingly strained as Fubara works to establish his own identity as governor.

In Nigerian politics, it is not uncommon for successors to feel overshadowed by their predecessors, especially when the latter wields significant influence. Fubara’s attempts to assert his independence may be seen as an effort to step out of Wike’s shadow and make a mark of his own. However, for Wike, this might be perceived as ingratitude or an affront to his legacy and political prowess.

At the heart of this power tussle is the larger-than-life image of Wike, whose legacy in Rivers State remains undeniable. His achievements, particularly in infrastructure development, are visible across the state. But as Fubara begins to carve out his path, the question remains: “Can both men coexist without undermining each other?”

In many ways, the conflict between Wike and Fubara represents the age-old battle between continuity and change. Wike’s legacy, while significant, must evolve as Rivers State enters a new chapter under Fubara’s leadership. On the other hand, Fubara’s leadership needs stability and wisdom from his predecessor’s experience to fully thrive.

Should Wike and Fubara continue their standoff, the state may suffer from the distraction of political infighting. In times like these, the focus must shift from individual interests to collective governance. Rivers State, with its rich resources and potential, deserves leadership that is unified in its pursuit of progress.

Analyzing the Wike-Fubara fight from any perspective yields one clear conclusion: this conflict, in no way, represents progress for Rivers State or the individuals involved. From whichever ramification it is assessed, politically, socially, or economically, their feud only serves to stall the state’s advancement and perpetuate division among their supporters.

Their ongoing dispute is not a symbol of strength but rather a distraction from the pressing challenges that demand their attention as leaders. In a state that has the potential for industrial growth, infrastructural expansion, and improvement in the welfare of its citizens, such internal squabbles only detract from governance. If the two leaders could channel the same energy they expend on their rivalry into resolving Rivers State’s issues, they would deliver lasting change that the people of the state desperately need.

It is essential to remind both Wike and Fubara that making peace and setting aside their differences will not make them lesser human beings, nor will it diminish their political standing. On the contrary, it would elevate them as leaders who can rise above personal grudges and put their state first. History has shown that true leadership is measured by the ability to prioritize the greater good, even when it means stepping back from conflict.

Wike, with his vast political experience and influence, should recognize the long-term benefits of reconciliation. His power and reputation will remain intact if he chooses to mentor Fubara from a place of peace rather than competition. Fubara, too, has nothing to lose by seeking harmony with his predecessor. By doing so, he will not only solidify his standing as governor but also prove that he is a leader capable of forging unity, not division.

The people of Rivers State need a united leadership. The developmental challenges facing the state, from unemployment to infrastructure decay, cannot be effectively addressed if the leaders are constantly at odds. By shielding their swords, Wike and Fubara would send a powerful message that they are willing to do what it takes to put their state first.

Rivers State’s development trajectory should not be derailed by personal differences. A peaceful resolution between Wike and Fubara is not just a matter of political convenience; it is a necessity for the progress of the state. The people of Rivers deserve leaders who are focused on governance, not bickering.

Their fight does not benefit anyone, not their loyalists, not the state’s economy, and certainly not the ordinary citizens who look to them for leadership. For Rivers State to flourish, both Wike and Fubara must rise above this unnecessary conflict and work together.

History will remember them not for the battles they fought against each other, but for the legacies they left behind. If Wike and Fubara choose to shield their swords, they will not lose their identities. Rather, they will be remembered as statesmen who put their people first.

In the end, true leadership is defined by wisdom, not just power. Rivers State needs both Wike and Fubara to lead with that wisdom, not with their swords drawn. The question now is, will they rise to the occasion?

In Nigeria, where music and culture intertwine with deep-seated traditions and monarchies, few moments carry as much weight as when a cultural figure meets with royalty. Such was the occasion on a remarkable day when Afrobeats superstar Davido paid homage to the Olu of Warri, Ogiame Atuwatse III. This meeting was not just a gesture of respect, but a blending of modernity and heritage, two forces that define Nigeria today.

Davido, whose real name is David Adedeji Adeleke, has long been celebrated as one of Nigeria’s biggest musical exports. Known for hit tracks like “Fall,” “FEM,” and “If,” he has transcended boundaries both within and beyond the continent, bringing Afrobeats to the world stage. His fame, however, has not detached him from his roots, a quality he demonstrated on this occasion when he visited the Olu of Warri’s palace. This event symbolized the merging of Nigeria’s dynamic contemporary culture and its regal traditions, as the two worlds came together in a spirit of mutual admiration.

The Olu of Warri, Ogiame Atuwatse III, is one of Nigeria’s most revered monarchs, presiding over the Itsekiri people of Delta State. His reign is marked by a focus on modernization, cultural preservation, and a deep connection to his people’s heritage. Since his ascension to the throne in August 2021, the Olu of Warri has become a symbol of progressive leadership, advocating for the balance between traditional values and the inevitable pull of modernization.

For Davido, this visit was more than just a formality. The Afrobeat star has always made it clear that despite his global fame, his connection to his Nigerian heritage remains unshakeable. This homage to the Olu of Warri showcased his commitment to respecting traditional authority and the values that have shaped the Nigerian identity for generations.

The ceremony, which took place at the Olu’s palace in Warri, was a vibrant affair. With the atmosphere filled with anticipation, dignitaries, chiefs, and well-wishers gathered to witness the historic moment when one of Nigeria’s leading cultural icons would pay his respects to one of its most important traditional rulers.

In Nigeria, paying homage to a traditional ruler is a gesture steeped in history and meaning. For centuries, traditional rulers have commanded respect not only within their communities but also at the national level. Monarchs like the Olu of Warri serve as custodians of culture, history, and local customs, preserving these values for future generations.

When Davido knelt before the Olu of Warri, it was a powerful image that spoke to the importance of humility and respect for the institution of monarchy, even in an era where fame and fortune often seem to override cultural traditions. In this single act, Davido demonstrated that no matter how high one rises, the respect for tradition and the symbols of authority remains paramount.

Ogiame Atuwatse III, in return, welcomed Davido with open arms, expressing his admiration for the artist’s contributions to Nigerian culture through his music. The king praised Davido for using his platform to promote Nigeria globally and for staying grounded in his values, a gesture that highlighted the monarch’s own progressive outlook. This mutual recognition spoke volumes about the evolving relationship between traditional rulers and contemporary figures in the entertainment industry.

Beyond the immediate symbolism of the meeting, the day Davido paid homage to the Olu of Warri carries broader significance for Nigeria’s cultural landscape. It serves as a reminder that even in an era of rapid change, traditional values and institutions remain central to the Nigerian experience. The connection between celebrities like Davido and traditional rulers like the Olu of Warri strengthens the cultural fabric of the nation, ensuring that the legacies of the past are not lost amidst the waves of modernity.

In addition to this, the event highlighted the intersection of cultural diplomacy and entertainment. For a global star like Davido, this homage was not just about paying respect, it was also about reinforcing the narrative that Nigerian culture is vibrant, diverse, and worthy of global recognition. His homage to the Olu of Warri transcended mere formalities; it became an act of cultural promotion, with Davido acting as a bridge between the younger generation and the traditional custodians of Nigeria’s heritage.

The event also resonated deeply with fans and observers who recognized the significance of the moment. Social media was abuzz with commentary, as Nigerians and fans across the world reacted to images and videos of Davido’s visit. Many praised him for staying connected to his roots, while others commented on how the meeting symbolized the harmonious relationship between Nigeria’s past, present, and future.

The meeting between Davido and the Olu of Warri is emblematic of a broader phenomenon occurring in Nigeria today. As the country continues to evolve, there is a growing recognition of the need to preserve its rich cultural heritage while embracing the opportunities and challenges that come with modernity. Traditional rulers like Ogiame Atuwatse III play a crucial role in this process, serving as both guardians of the past and advocates for the future.

Similarly, cultural figures like Davido are at the forefront of a global movement to promote African culture through music, fashion, and art. His homage to the Olu of Warri not only affirmed his respect for tradition but also positioned him as an ambassador of Nigerian culture on the global stage. The fusion of these two worlds, traditional leadership and modern entertainment, reflects the ongoing evolution of Nigerian society.

In fact, the day Davido paid homage to the Olu of Warri will be remembered as a moment of cultural significance in Nigeria’s history. It was a day that reminded Nigerians, and indeed the world, that no matter how much the country progresses, the importance of tradition and respect for authority will always have a place in the nation’s identity.

As Nigeria continues to navigate the complex terrain of globalization and cultural preservation, moments like these serve as a beacon, guiding the way forward. Davido’s visit to the Olu of Warri was not just a visit; it was a powerful testament to the enduring relevance of tradition in modern Nigeria, and a call to future generations to honor the past even as they shape the future.

Editors of Nigerian print and online newspapers and websites, are you not tired of using the word “sweep” to report the results of local government elections wherever they are held in Nigeria? Can’t you flip the pages of Roget’s Thesaurus, or even of the old Student’s Companion that we relied upon during our school days, to synonyms and reduce readers’ boredom? 

Four Nigerian states, namely Jigawa, Benue, Akwa Ibom and Rivers, held local government elections [if they can be called that] this weekend. Early on Sunday morning, all the newspapers reported that “APC sweeps Benue council polls.” Chairman of Benue State Independent [if it can be called that] Electoral Commission, BSIEC, Richard Tombowua, said candidates of APC, which controls the state government but which is riven by divisions, won all 27 chairmanship and all 276 councillorships across the state, leaving none to the seven other political parties that contested the election. The word “contested” here should be qualified because quite often, small and virtually non-existent parties are mobilized to “contest” local elections in order to give them some credibility, although I am not necessarily saying that was what happened in Benue. The fact that the state’s governor is a Roman Catholic priest, there was widespread expectation that elections in Benue will rise above the Nigerian normal.

Weekend’s local government election in Rivers was the most anticipated in the country. Because it was not really an election; it was a mighty contest of egos between godfather and former godson; state power versus federal power; courts controversially wading in to stop an election when the Constitution empowers, in fact mandates, the state electoral commission to conduct a local election. Nigeria Police, which has got thousands of unobeyed court orders lying in its shelves, rushing to “obey” a court order and, not only refuse to provide security for an election but tried to thwart it. No one even knows which parties the top antagonists belong to. The godfather Nyesom Wike controls both the national and Rivers State PDP, is a serving minister in an APC government, and had made 27 members of the State Assembly loyal to him to all defect to APC. Governor Siminayi Fubara, on the other hand, was elected on PDP’s platform, never said he deserted it, has the support of fellow PDP governors, but just before the election, he directed his supporters to contest under the platform of almost unheard-of Action Peoples Party, APP.

Within hours of the election’s end, Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) announced that APP “swept” 22 of the state’s 23 Local Government chairmanships. One LGA and the councillorships were yet to be declared but everyone knows that as night follows day, APP will sweep [that word again] all of them. The danger existed that someone will go to court on Monday and seek to quash the election, so Governor Fubara hurriedly swore in the elected chairmen on Sunday, usually a non-working day. At least, the worst Nigerian courts could do is to ask for the status quo to be maintained, and the status quo means Fubara’s men are sitting pretty on their seats.

Benue and Rivers were not the only cases of “sweep” this year. Local government polls were held in Borno State [luckily, months ahead of the Flood].  Again, the word “sweeps” was in play. Chairman   of   Borno   State Independent Electoral Commission (BOSIEC), Alhaji Lawan Maina, announced that APC, which governs the state, won all 27 chairmanships and all 312 councilors in the state. Five other political parties that contested the election could not grab even one councillorship.

Nearby Yobe State, which was excised from Borno State 23 years ago has a very similar history and political culture, plus the most astute gentleman as Governor. It held local elections in April and the YOSIEC Chairman Dr. Mamman Mohamed announced that APC, which rules the state, swept all 17 chairmanships, 15 of them unopposed, and all the councillorships at stake. It was understandable that Borno and Yobe should exhibit similarities in political behaviour, but Bauchi State, which separated from them nearly 50 years ago, was also a case of sweep because in local elections held in August, PDP, which governs the state, swept all 20 chairmanships and all the councillorships.

PDP was also on a roll in Adamawa State, a state it controls. In local polls held in August, the party swept all 21 chairmanship seats. Chairman of the Adamawa State Independent Electoral Commission Alhaji Mohammed Umar said PDP also won 225 councillorship seats while the New Nigeria People’s Party won one seat in Demsa ward in Demsa Local Government Area. At least it was not a total sweep; PDP lost one councillorship seat!

PDP chapters in three other states were not as magnanimous as in Adamawa. In local council polls held in Oyo State in July, PDP candidates won all 33 chairmanship positions. OYSIEC chairman  Isiaka Olagunju also said PDP won 499 of the 500 councillorship seats at stake, thus necessitating the use of the word “sweep” in all newspaper headlines.

Nor did PDP let go in Delta State, where local polls were held in July. Jerry Agbaike, chairperson of DSIEC who announced the results in Asaba, said PDP “swept” all 25 local government chairmanship seats and also “clinched” 499 of the 500 councillorship seats, losing one to the Allied Peoples Movement in Oshimili North Local Government Area. Agbaike said no election was held in Udu Local Government because the PDP chairmanship candidate was returned unopposed.

In Enugu State too, which is PDP controlled, the party was on a roll in local elections held in September. Prof. Christian Ngwu, Chairman of the Enugu State Independent Electoral Commission (ENSIEC), announced that PDP candidates won all chairmanship and all councillorship positions, another case of clean sweep.

Before you say PDP is the party of sweep, APC too did several clean sweeps of its own in recent local polls. Apart from the aforementioned ones in Borno, Yobe and Benue, APC candidates in Imo State  “cleared” all the 27 local government chairmanships and all 305 councillorship seats in local elections. Charles Ejiogu, chairman of ISIEC, said “All the candidates of APC have been officially declared winners as Councilors and Executive Council Chairmen-elects.” At least in Imo, the word used was not “swept” but “cleared,” a sign that Roget’s Thesaurus was consulted for some variety.

In elections conducted by the Kebbi State Independent Electoral Commission (KESIEC) in early September, its chairman, Aliyu Mohammed Mera, announced that “APC won all the chairmanship and councillorship seats based on the results collated from the 21 local government areas where the elections were conducted.” APC is the ruling party in Kebbi State. PDP, which forced it into a run-off in last year’s governorship polls, did not participate in the election, citing allegations that KESIEC officials were affiliated with APC [as if that is not the case everywhere else]. No one expected Sokoto State to be different from Kebbi, two states that were not only together in the Hausa kingdoms, Sokoto Caliphate, Northern Region, North Western State and old Sokoto State but are remarkably similar in ethnic, religious, cultural and even political outlook, both of them ruled by APC. It was no surprise therefore that when Sokoto held local elections in late September, Chairman of SOSIEC Alhaji Aliyu Sulaiman announced that APC candidates “swept” all 23 chairmanship and all the councillorship seats at stake, even though 14 other political parties contested the election.

If “sweeping” is the stuff that both the nationally ruling APC and the main opposition PDP are made of, what about the other three political parties that control at least one state each in Nigeria? Well, we have already seen the stuff of one of them. In local elections held in Anambra State on September 28,  All Progressives Grand Alliance [APGA], which rules the state, was said to have “coasted home to victory” in all 21 chairmanship and all 326 councillorship positions in the state. Chairman of ANSIEC Genevieve Osakwe announced the results in Awka. So, it made no difference that the state governor is a professor, who blows very heavy grammar, who was the governor of another place before Anambra, and yet ANSIEC is attached to APGA apron strings like all the rest of them?

We are waiting to see if things will be different in Abia, the only state controlled by Labour Party, and in Kano, the only state controlled by NNPP. I have my doubts, because newspaper reports said NNPP “primaries” were held in the house of its leader, Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso, and some party stalwarts emerged from the house, protesting loudly that it was not democratic because the Leader anointed his favoured persons. I do not know if that was true, since I was not a delegate to the red-cap Kwankwasiyya “primaries.” But the real test will soon come when the state holds local elections. NNPP only just managed to edge out APC in last year’s governorship polls but no one will be surprised if it “sweeps” all the seats in the upcoming local elections.

This word “sweep,” I am fed up with it. All the “national” and “international” election observers who were harping on INEC’s perceived shortcomings in last year’s general elections as well as in some off-season governorship elections since then, what have they got to say about State “Independent” Electoral Commissions all over the country, regardless of region, religion or political party in power in the state? All the institutions created by the 1999 Constitution as amended have exhibited one failure or another in the discharge or lack of discharge of their duties, but that of SIECs is the most glaring. It is time to end this sweeping game by sweeping them out of the Constitution.

In Nigeria's dynamic political landscape, it is rare to find individuals whose contributions leave a lasting impact on their communities and the nation at large. Senator Ned Munir Nwoko stands out as one such leader whose patriotism, dedication, and advocacy have earned him widespread admiration. His contributions to his constituency, his advocacy for the creation of Anioma State, and his unwavering commitment to national development make him a worthy example of the kind of leadership Nigeria needs today.

One of Senator Nwoko’s most notable contributions to Nigeria's political development is his persistent advocacy for the creation of Anioma State. Anioma, which means “good land” in Igbo, comprises the people of the Delta North Senatorial District in Delta State. The call for the creation of this state dates back several decades, with many advocates from Anioma seeing it as the only path to guaranteeing equitable development and representation for their people.

Senator Nwoko has played a pivotal role in keeping this dream alive. While some politicians might abandon such a cause due to its long-standing nature, Nwoko’s relentless pursuit of Anioma State demonstrates his vision and deep sense of commitment to his people. Through various platforms, both local and national, he has consistently voiced the need for Anioma State, emphasizing that its creation would ensure fair distribution of resources and power within Delta State. 

His advocacy is rooted in a desire for equity and justice for the Anioma people, who have often felt marginalized in the larger Delta State political structure. As a patriotic leader, Nwoko’s vision is not connected to personal gain but stems from a genuine desire to improve the socio-economic conditions of his people. His relentless push for this cause has inspired many to believe that Anioma State is not a farfetched dream but an achievable reality.

Beyond his advocacy for Anioma State, Senator Ned Nwoko has demonstrated unparalleled commitment to the development of his constituency. Representing the Delta North Senatorial District, Nwoko has shown what true leadership means through numerous developmental projects aimed at uplifting his people.

One of his most impactful initiatives is his dedication to education. Nwoko firmly believes that education is the foundation of development, and he has worked tirelessly to improve access to quality education in his constituency. Through scholarships and educational grants, he has supported thousands of students from Delta North, helping them pursue higher education both in Nigeria and abroad. His philanthropic efforts in this sector reflect his deep commitment to empowering future generations with the tools they need to succeed in an increasingly competitive world.

In addition to education, Senator Nwoko has been instrumental in improving infrastructure within his constituency. He has facilitated the construction of roads, health centers, and water projects, bringing much-needed amenities to rural communities that were previously neglected. These projects have transformed the lives of his constituents, enhancing their quality of life and providing them with opportunities for growth and development.

Moreover, Nwoko’s passion for youth empowerment stands out. In a country where youth unemployment remains a pressing issue, the senator has introduced several initiatives aimed at creating jobs and encouraging entrepreneurship among young people in Delta North. By providing skill acquisition programs, startup grants, and mentorship opportunities, Nwoko is fostering a culture of self-reliance and innovation among the youth, ensuring that they can contribute meaningfully to the development of their communities.

Senator Nwoko’s contributions extend beyond his constituency, as he has consistently demonstrated a deep commitment to the development of Nigeria as a whole. His patriotism is evident in his approach to national issues, where he has consistently advocated for policies that benefit the entire country.

One of his most significant national contributions is his involvement in the fight against malaria, a disease that has plagued Nigeria for decades. Recognizing the devastating impact of malaria on the country’s health and economic sectors, Senator Nwoko launched the “Malaria Eradication Project”, a comprehensive initiative aimed at eradicating the disease from Nigeria and Africa at large. His efforts include advocating for the fumigation of communities, the distribution of mosquito nets, and the promotion of malaria vaccination research.

This initiative has garnered widespread attention, with Nwoko positioning himself as a leading voice in the global fight against malaria. His commitment to this cause is a testament to his deep sense of duty and responsibility toward improving the lives of Nigerians. By addressing one of the country’s most pressing health challenges, Nwoko is not only saving lives but also contributing to Nigeria’s overall socio-economic development.

In the realm of politics, Nwoko’s contributions to nation-building are equally commendable. His tenure as a member of the House of Representatives from 1999 to 2003 was marked by significant legislative achievements. As a lawmaker, he advocated for laws that promoted social justice, economic growth, and national unity. Even after his term in the House, Nwoko has remained an influential figure in Nigerian politics, using his platform to champion causes that promote good governance and accountability.

Senator Ned Nwoko’s journey is a clear demonstration of what it means to be a patriotic leader. His contributions to his constituency, his unwavering advocacy for Anioma State, and his national efforts in the fight against malaria all point to a man who is deeply committed to the progress of his people and his country. Nwoko’s leadership is characterized by integrity, vision, and an unshakable belief in the potential of Nigeria.

In a time when many politicians are seen as self-serving, Nwoko stands out as a beacon of hope, a leader who puts the needs of his people above personal gain. His dedication to the causes he believes in, particularly his singular effort in advocating for the creation of Anioma State, speaks volumes about his character and his desire for justice and equity.

Nigerian politicians, both young and old, can learn valuable lessons from Nwoko’s approach to leadership. His emphasis on education, infrastructure, youth empowerment, and health are pillars that should guide the actions of every public servant. Furthermore, his commitment to fairness, as seen in his advocacy for Anioma State, highlights the importance of standing up for marginalized communities and ensuring that every group in Nigeria has a voice in the country’s development.

Senator Ned Nwoko is, without a doubt, a leader worthy of emulation. His contributions to his constituency and to Nigeria as a whole demonstrate that true leadership is about service, vision, and patriotism. As Nigeria continues to navigate its challenges, leaders like Nwoko offer a model of what is possible when leaders are driven by a deep sense of duty to their people. His unwavering advocacy for the creation of Anioma State, his impressive work in the fight against malaria, and his dedication to improving the lives of his constituents all serve as powerful reminders that with the right leadership, Nigeria can achieve greatness.

At an all-time high of 34.2%, Nigeria's inflation's effect on fuel price volatility is one that can not be overemphasized. But it's high time we acknowledged that our addiction to fossil fuels is no longer sustainable - especially in a fast-evolving world.

Although many factors—including the fluctuations in global oil prices have left our fuel prices skyrocketing, but this crisis presents an opportunity for innovation—only if FG would see beyond the presence.

No progressive country in the world would turn a blind eye to the potential of technology in transforming its mobility landscape and reducing its dependence on fossil fuels. Electric vehicles, alternative fuels, fuel efficiency technologies, mobility-as-a-service, and smart traffic management are no longer futuristic concepts; they're viable solutions Nigeria, too, needs to start embracing on a large scale.

When you look at how countries like Norway have strategically transitioned to electric vehicles, how Sweden has pioneered biofuel initiatives, and how Singapore's facilitated intelligent transportation systems, then one would realize that these demonstrate that technology can liberate Nigeria too from the shackles of fuel dependency.

So, then, the question arises: what's holding Nigeria back? Our government's hesitation to invest in alternative energy sources and transportation infrastructure is staggering. The Innoson CNG buses (some of which are already on the roads in Lagos and Abuja) are worthy of commendations, but it's just like rotating in a circle. It's not really the solution. The most effective solution would have been that the 36 state governments and FG invest heavily in technology and develop a comprehensive national electric vehicle policy. This would undoubtedly reduce the demand for fuel, and as such, the hike in price would fall drastically.

That fossil fuels pose existential risks to the planet and climate change, is another reason the Nigerian government needs to transit from them and encourage public-private partnerships for mobility-as-a-service and smart transportation systems.

The benefits to be cupped from this are numerous, some of which are reduced fuel imports and increased foreign exchange savings, improved air quality and public health, enhanced economic productivity and competitiveness, and even, creation of new industries and job opportunities.

Nigeria's future depends on our willingness to embrace technological disruption. We must seize this moment to redefine our mobility landscape and secure a sustainable future. Whether we will continue to perpetuate our fossil fuel addiction or will we choose the path of innovation is a choice we need to make for the progress of this country.

Yusuf Babatunde is the CEO of Mapleby Autos

A bill seeking to establish another intervention agency for the Niger Delta region, to be known as the South-South Development Commission (SSDC), has just passed Second Reading in the Senate and has been sent to the Special Duties Committee for further consideration. It is sponsored by Senator Ekpenyong Asuquo of Calabar South and co-sponsored by all the other 17 senators of region. The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, is the brain behind the legislation, and I understand that he has staked his political capital on it and wants it passed by all means. The bill was first presented on the floor of the senate three months ago, but was roundly rejected by the senators who argued that the proposed commission is a duplication to the NDDC which has been in existence since 2000. ‘’The rejection was a personal embarrassment to the Senate President, but he withdrew to fight another day’’, a senator told me.

There were still some pockets of resistance when the bill was represented last week, but, this time, senators from the South-south region were more pushful to get it passed. Senator Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa argued that while NDDC is a resource-based commission, specifically meant for the oil producing states, including Imo and Abia, SSDC will only cater for the six states of the Niger Delta region. Senators are even contemplating a name change for the NDDC to reflect its focus on oil-producing states and distinguish it from the new agency. Senator Ekong Sampson (Akwa Ibom South) told me last week: ‘’I represent the major oil belt of the region. We feel the pain and bear the brunt of oil production. NDDC is for all the oil-producing states of the nation; the SSDC is specifically for the South-South region which has over the centuries been devastated by oil production. I am therefore very confident that the SSDC bill would be passed’’.

In 2017, the Senate created the North East Development Commission, the first of such regional body established after NDDC. NEDC was necessitated by the need to rebuild the North East after years of decimation by terrorist attacks. I supported its creation and argued that because of our interconnectedness, any part of the country left behind would be a drag on the rest of us. Since then, similar regional development agencies have been created for the other four regions - North West, South West, South East and North Central. Now that the South-South senators have tabled their demands, we have come full circle. By their enabling laws, these regional bodies have similar organizational and management structures and sources of funding. They receive funds from the federation account, in addition to donations, aids and grants. Their mandate is to tackle developmental and environmental challenges peculiar to each region. For the SSDC, priority would be given to ecological and environmental hazards; infrastructural inadequacies as well as militancy and communal crises which have plagued the region for years.

I support the creation of the SSDC for the South-South region and commend Senator Akpabio for spearheading it. I’m also thankful to the senators from other states, notably Suleman Kawu (Kano South) and Enyinnaya Abaribe (Abia South) for endorsing the bill. The argument that it is a duplication to the NDDC is flawed. For one, the North Central Development Commission was created earlier this year despite the existence of Hydro Electric Power Producing Areas Commission (HYPPADEC) created in 2010. Yet, nobody raised the issue of duplication. Second, SSDC and NDDC have different mandate areas. NDDC’s mandate extends well beyond the six south-south states, to cover Abia, Ondo and Imo; and may extend further to include new oil producers like Lagos, Nassarawa, Bauchi and others in the Benue trough. Third, since NDDC’s programmes and projects are shared among the nine mandate states based on their respective volume of crude oil production, states like Cross River that produce marginally have benefitted least from the NDDC programmes. The SSDC is therefore needed to make up for this inadequacy by providing fairly and equitably to the six states.  

 I have, however, noticed that the SSDC Bill does not specify where to locate the commission’s headquarters, unlike the NDDC Law which specifies Port Harcourt as the commission’s headquarters and the Nigerian Content Development Board (NCDB) law which stipulates Yenogoa as its headquarter. This omission could create unwarranted squabbles among the states and I urge Senator Akpabio to ensure that the oversight is addressed. The SSDC Bill should stipulate Uyo as the location for its corporate headquarters for many reasons. Akwa Ibom is not only the largest oil producing state, it is also the most peaceful, hospitable and suitable for siting an important federal agency. The Senate President must bring this one home.

For Senator Akpabio, SSDC might just be a given, but he has lot more to do. The lukewarm attitude of the federal government to the establishment of Ibom Deep Sea Port has put the Senate President in a difficult position. He is a leading member of the Tinubu inner circle. He flies into Uyo in a presidential jet and tools around in a big motorcade. Gov. Umo Eno fawns over him while the people sing his praises - all in an attempt to get him to facilitate federal support for the port project, which is clearly the people’s most sought-after infrastructural investment. But, so far, there is no indication that President Tinubu is interested in the project. This leaves Akpabio with nothing to brag about when he visits home, and the people sorely disappointed.

Nigeria’s mobile money transactions have grown nearly 30-fold over the past five years. Between January and July 2020, mobile money transactions grew from N1.37 trillion to N41.54 trillion in the same period in 2024, according to data from the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS).

Mobile money transactions rose by 2,472.75 per cent to 1.64 billion in 2023 from 63.79 million in 2020. Despite boasting 17 companies licensed by the CBN as mobile money operators (non-bank-led), this growth has been driven by Chinese fintech companies Opay and Palmpay.

“OPay and PalmPay are the most prominent non-MNO-led mobile money providers and have gained significant market share in Nigeria since receiving their MMO licence,” stated GSMA, the global telecom industry body.

They achieved this by tapping into Nigeria’s mobile boom, offering free and fast transfers during their early years and then heavily discounted transfers as they matured. They further gained credibility during a failed Central Bank of Nigeria naira redesign and withdrawal policy in 2022.

Humble Beginnings

OPay began operations in 2010 as PayCom Nigeria Limited, a mobile money platform incubated by Telnet (Nigeria) Limited.  In 2018, it was acquired by Opera, owned by Chinese billionaire Yahui Zhou, and rebranded as OPay.

PlamPay launched later, entering the Nigerian markets in 2019 after raising a $40 million seed round led by Chinese mobile phone maker Transsion. As part of the investment, PalmPay was preinstalled on Transsion’s mobile brands Tecno, Infinix, and Itel.

Market Entry Strategy

OPay gained its way into the hearts of many Nigerians by becoming a super app after Opera’s takeover. The company operated numerous services, including ride-hailing at cheap rates. According to reports, its monthly active users surged from around 100,000 in April 2019 to 5 million a year later (which rose to 30 million in June 2023).

At its peak, the company provided 10 million weekly rides across 18 cities while expanding its agent network to over 500,000 agents. By July 2020, it shut down its other services to focus exclusively on fintech.

PalmPay, leveraging Transsion’s dominance in the smartphone market, rapidly grew its user base, now at 35 million. By 2023, Canalys, a leading global technology market analyst firm, revealed that Transsion and Xiaomi accounted for 85 per cent of the smartphone shipments into Nigeria in the third quarter of 2023.

In 2019, Greg Reeves, PalmPay’s chief executive officer, said, “On channel and access, we’re going to be pre-installed on all Tecno phones. You’re gonna find us in the Tecno stores and outlets. So we get an immediate channel and leg up in any market we operate in.”

By investing in an extensive agent network of around 500,000 agents, PalmPay gained a foothold in urban and rural areas.

“These fintechs were aggressive with their approach to penetrating the market. Most importantly is embracing the agent network model where agents can recruit other agents for all of these operators with very good incentives in place, particularly for Moniepoint,” Victor Olojo, former national president of the Association of Mobile Money and Banking Agents of Nigeria (AMMBAN) earlier told BusinessDay.

Free and Cheap Transfers

OPay and PalmPay employed similar strategies to retain customers: free and low-cost transfers.

OPay offered free transfers until June 2023, after which they introduced a minimal charge of N10 after the third transfer in a day. PalmPay implemented the same strategy, introducing the N10 fee after years of offering free transfers.

Both fintechs achieved this by leveraging fundraising. OPay has raised $570 million so far, while PalmPay has raised $400 million. “Their success can be attributed to first their financial strength. Top players must have deep resources,” noted Olojo.

Failed Naira Redesign

In 2023, OPay gathered journalists in its Ikeja office to explain how its IT investments gave it an edge when Nigerians needed cashless terminals. The company pointed out that its agile IT network enabled rapid capacity expansion, surpassing traditional banks’ capabilities.

He said this against the backdrop of a naira scarcity that had almost crippled the economy. In 2022, the CBN announced the release of redesigned naira notes for higher denominations (N200, N500, and N1000) and a withdrawal policy to encourage cashless transactions.

During the implementation of this policy, traditional banks struggled to handle the surge in demand, leading to widespread transaction failures. This allowed OPay and PalmPay to fill the gap. By March 2023, both apps were Nigeria’s most downloaded finance apps, and OPay became the country’s most-downloaded app by October 2023.

“They made payment methods easier, faster, and better, and people began relying on them for everyday things,” said Adedeji Olowe, founder of Lendsqr.

Boosting Financial Inclusion

Both fintechs powered a boom in microtransactions, enabling more transactions to be cashless. “There was a boom in microtransactions when the cashless issue happened,” noted Nosa Oyegun, VP of product and innovation at Kuda.

The growth of these fintechs drove financial inclusion, with more people onboarded into the financial system. “MMOs have succeeded in onboarding unbanked users using lower know-your-customer (KYC) requirements,” GSMA said.

“The future is all about financial inclusion. We want to reach out, especially to the last man. For the people who don’t even use a smartphone,” said Chika Nwosu, the managing director at Palmpay Nigeria. “Our major objective is to use technology to support financial inclusion.”

Nigeria’s mobile money transactions have also contributed to global increases. In 2023, total transactions rose to $1.4 trillion, driven mostly by growth in Nigeria, Ghana, and Senegal, according to Mats Granryd, director general of the GSMA.

[Businessday]

Nigeria has significantly contributed troops and police officers to the United Nations peacekeeping operations worldwide since 1960. That year, the Nigeria Police deployed the first-ever contingent of individual police officers to the UN Mission in the Congo. Assistant Commissioner of Police Louis Edet led the team at the time. In these operations, Nigeria resolutely committed herself to the onerous task of maintaining world peace and security. Some of the country’s gallant officers paid the supreme price, while many were injured and maimed for life. During the military era, particularly during the reign of General Ibrahim Babangida, under the auspices of the African Union and ECOWAS, there was the ECOWAS Monitoring Group, which intervened decisively in Liberia, paving the way for the restoration of civil rule in that country. Rebel leaders had turned Liberia into a theatre of war in their desperate battle for power. 

Nigeria’s troops were also the military backbone of the UN Mission in Liberia from 2003-2018, restoring security throughout that country. 

Since then, Nigeria has been involved in peacekeeping operations in many African countries, including Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, The Gambia, Mali, Sudan, Sierra Leone, Mozambique, Somalia, Rwanda and Burundi. The government has contributed a lot in finance, logistics and civilian experts to these missions. Beyond Africa, the country’s police force participated in operations in Western Sahara, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, East Timor, Haiti, Kosovo and Afghanistan, to mention but a few.

It is relevant to point out that Nigeria’s engagement is not only in peacekeeping or maintaining law and order across these nations; the country has helped stabilise and strengthen democracy in Africa. For instance, it’s on record that Nigeria’s former President Olusegun Obasanjo played a leading role in the international effort to restore democratic order in São Tomé and Principle when President Fradique de Menezes was toppled by the military in that country in July 2003 while visiting Nigeria. Obasanjo and other foreign leaders reined in the military junta that ousted Menezes. The former Nigerian president took Menezes in his plane, leading him back to power in the oil-rich island republic.

In addition, Nigeria’s effort helped ferry former military leader Yahya Jammeh from The Gambia when he became a stumbling block to constitutional order.

After losing the election his regime organised, Jammeh refused to concede defeat to Adama Baro, who won the poll. The private plane of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, now President Bola Tinubu, was deployed to evacuate the once-dreaded Jammeh out of The Gambia.

I can continue enumerating Nigeria’s efforts to help maintain peace and security worldwide.

It is against this backdrop of the country’s considerable efforts in maintaining peace and deepening democracy in Africa and beyond that the recent demand for a permanent seat for Africa in the UN Security Council be considered. No country in Africa has contributed to global peace and security than Nigeria in terms of human and material resources. The request for a well-deserved permanent seat for the continent was the highpoint of Nigeria’s presentation at the just-ended 79th session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA79) in the United States.

Vice President Kashim Shettima led Nigeria’s delegation to that session and presented the country’s national statement on behalf of President Tinubu. The president stayed back at home to attend to pressing domestic issues. That decision, the first by any Nigerian president since 1999, deserves commendation.

To say that Vice President Shettima ably represented the country is to state the obvious, particularly for those who watched the presentation live or on television. Resplendent in the country’s traditional white flowing babariga with a matching Borno cap, VP Shettima did an excellent job.

Making a case for this all-important seat on the UN’s exalted podium, the vice president said: “Reform of the Security Council is critical if the UN is to strengthen its relevance and credibility in our rapidly changing world. Some permanent members of the United Nations Security Council have offered encouraging, if tentative, indications of support on the issue of reform of the Council. We welcome the change in tone and urge acceleration in momentum to the process.

“The Security Council should be expanded, in the permanent and non-permanent member categories, to reflect the diversity and plurality of the world. We fully support the efforts of Secretary-General Guterres in this regard. Africa must be accorded the respect that it deserves in the Security Council. Our continent deserves a place in the permanent members category of the Security Council, with the same rights and responsibilities as other Permanent Members.”

With a population of over 1.3 billion people and home to the most critical mineral resources that will power the global economy, a permanent seat for Africa in the UN Security Council will ensure inclusivity and a spirit of brotherhood. Given its strategic importance, Africa should join the council’s five permanent members. And more than any other country on the African continent, Nigeria truly merits this seat. It is an entitlement and a matter of right.

First, the seat will serve as due compensation for Nigeria’s labour of service to the world. The country’s active participation in peacekeeping missions helped save countless lives and restore peace and stability to many countries. The UN has acknowledged this important work. In a publication of the world body in February 2019, the UN singled out Nigeria for praise for her service and sacrifice. However, the UN should do more than commendation. The world body should offer Nigeria this much-desired permanent seat to appreciate the country’s contribution.

Second, as indicated earlier, Nigeria contributed the most troops and police to UN missions among African nations. The Nigeria Police Force committed more men and materials to keep the peace in Africa and elsewhere. According to the Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, Nigeria contributed to 41 peacekeeping missions globally and deployed over 200,000 troops to UN operations since her first deployment in the Congo. He spoke in New York at the summit of the Future Interactive Dialogue on the theme: “Enhancing Multilateralism for International Peace and Security.”

The attendant cost to Nigeria’s engagement in these peacekeeping operations is enormous. For instance, official sources revealed that ECOMOG, a regional mediation force put together to end the protracted Liberian civil war, was operated at an estimated cost of $8 billion to the Nigerian government.

Third, and more importantly, with its large population of young, energetic, and creative people and enormous resources, Nigeria can provide the required leadership for Africa at the UN Security Council.

This is a role the country has been performing for many decades. It has the potential to perform this work even better. Nigeria will be the real giant of Africa if it rises to this eminent status.

Former South African President, the highly revered Dr Nelson Mandela, was once reported to have said that the Black Race would not achieve its status until Nigeria sorted itself out.

When President Bola Tinubu’s administration’s reform agenda fully manifests, Nigeria will sort itself out sooner, not later. Then, the country will take its rightful place as the true leader of Africa in the community of nations.

. Rahman is a Senior Presidential Aide.