![[OPINION] U.S Elections: Nigeria Politicians, Nobody Snatched Ballot Box - Ajiboye Amos Olakunle](/media/k2/items/cache/050a9fac476e0b4f7ca452c31c49ba4b_XL.jpg)
The recent conclusion of the United States’ presidential election was a powerful testament to democracy in action. With peaceful processes, respect for the rule of law, and a genuine commitment to the voice of the people, the U.S. has once again set a high standard for how elections should be conducted. Citizens, regardless of political affiliation, placed their faith in an electoral system that, while not perfect, is resilient against corruption and manipulation.
In stark contrast, Nigeria’s electoral history paints a grim picture. Every election cycle is marred by violence, widespread corruption, manipulation, and a culture of fear that undermines democratic principles. It’s time for Nigerian politicians to stop ignoring the glaring flaws in our electoral system and take inspiration from the peaceful, fair, and transparent electoral process displayed in the United States. This isn’t just about politics; it’s about restoring the dignity and trust of the Nigerian people. It’s almost impossible to displace an incumbent party in Nigeria elections but here, the people decide the government.
Nigeria’s History of Electoral Violence: A National Shame
The history of Nigerian elections is riddled with violent episodes that have cost lives, displaced communities, and weakened public confidence in democratic governance. Let’s take a brief look at some dark moments that marred our election history:
• 2007 Elections: Widely regarded as one of the most flawed in Nigeria's history, the 2007 elections saw large-scale ballot-box snatching, intimidation of voters, and violent clashes in many states. The violence left several people dead and reinforced Nigeria’s image as a nation where votes are bought or coerced, not cast freely.
• 2011 Elections: The presidential election in 2011 led to post-election violence that resulted in the deaths of hundreds across Northern Nigeria. Following the announcement of Goodluck Jonathan’s victory, supporters of his opponent, Muhammadu Buhari, took to the streets, leading to violent clashes, burning of properties, and numerous fatalities.
• 2019 Elections: The 2019 general elections brought a new wave of violence and ballot manipulation. Reports of widespread voter suppression, intimidation by armed thugs, and compromised election officials dominated the headlines. This further discouraged voter turnout and deepened public distrust.
• 2023 Elections: Despite technological advancements such as the introduction of the BVAS system, the 2023 elections were still marred by violence, bribery, and manipulation. Voter intimidation reached alarming levels, with armed thugs openly threatening voters in certain states. Numerous independent observers reported cases of vote-buying and logistical failures that conveniently disenfranchised certain regions.
Each of these elections is a testament to how deeply entrenched corruption and violence are within the Nigerian political landscape. The Nigerian people have been continuously let down, witnessing a lack of accountability and respect for democratic processes. In many cases, those involved in electoral malpractices go unpunished, reinforcing a system that rewards manipulation and dishonesty.
The United States’ Elections: A Model of Transparency and Accountability
In the United States, elections are far from perfect, but they demonstrate a profound commitment to transparency and accountability. Here are some aspects of the recent U.S. election that Nigerian politicians must pay attention to:
• Transparency in Voting Process: The United States employs stringent measures to secure ballots and ensure that the counting process is transparent. Election observers, media, and independent monitoring bodies are involved in all stages of the election to guarantee the integrity of results.
• Swift and Decisive Action Against Fraud: The U.S. takes election fraud and misconduct seriously, with robust legal frameworks in place to handle irregularities. Anyone attempting to tamper with the process faces severe legal consequences. In Nigeria, however, cases of electoral fraud often go unpunished, and perpetrators roam freely, some even rewarded with powerful positions.
• Non-violent Electoral Process: Throughout the election, there was a noticeable absence of violence. This reflects a political culture that prioritizes the safety and security of its citizens above personal ambition. The notion of sacrificing lives for political gain is unheard of in a system that values human life and democratic values.
• Respect for Rule of Law and Due Process: The United States’ institutions are built on the rule of law, ensuring that politicians respect due process even when election results are contested. In Nigeria, contested results often lead to prolonged litigation, increased tensions, and sometimes violent responses that destabilize communities and weaken the nation’s fabric.
Nigeria’s Path Forward: An Urgent Call for Change
Nigeria’s politicians have no excuse. They have a clear example in front of them—a model that proves elections can be conducted peacefully and fairly if the right systems are in place and respected. Nigerian leaders need to prioritize integrity, transparency, and accountability in the electoral process. This change will not only restore public trust but also stabilize Nigeria, fostering an environment conducive to growth and progress.
Here are actionable steps Nigerian politicians and electoral bodies must take to restore faith in Nigeria’s democracy:
• Enforce Electoral Laws Without Bias: Those found guilty of electoral malpractices should face severe consequences, regardless of their political affiliation or influence. The law must be impartial and serve as a deterrent for future misconduct.
• Strengthen the Independence of INEC: The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must be truly independent, free from political influence and manipulation. Adequate resources should be allocated to ensure that INEC is equipped to conduct elections that reflect the will of the people.
• Prioritize Security During Elections: Ensuring voter safety should be a top priority. The presence of armed security personnel at polling stations must be unbiased and non-threatening, solely to maintain peace, not to intimidate voters.
• Invest in Voter Education and Civic Engagement: Educating citizens about their rights, the importance of peaceful elections, and the value of their votes can help mitigate violence and foster a culture of democratic participation.
• Adopt Technology with Integrity: Modern technology, like the BVAS, can enhance transparency, but only if used responsibly and free from manipulation. Training and accountability should be prioritized to ensure the effective deployment of such tools.
Conclusion: A Moment for Self-Reflection and Action
Nigeria’s political leaders are at a crossroads. The peaceful U.S. election has shown what is possible when leaders value integrity over personal gain. The Nigerian people deserve leaders who respect their voices and put national interest above selfish ambition. Every election marred by violence and fraud is a betrayal of the people’s trust and a failure to honor the sacrifices made by past generations to secure democracy.
This is a call to Nigeria’s politicians: reflect on the shameful legacy of violence and corruption that defines our elections. Think of the lives lost, the hopes dashed, and the damage done to our nation’s reputation. Now is the time for a complete overhaul in Nigeria’s political and electoral landscape.
Nigerians are watching, and they are demanding change. The world is watching too, and it sees Nigeria’s leaders for what they are—either a force for positive transformation or, once again, a source of disappointment and despair. The choice is yours. It’s time for Nigerian politicians to embrace change, honor the will of the people, and finally allow democracy to flourish in Nigeria.