The recent statement by Felix Morka, the APC national spokesperson, has indeed raised concerns about the government’s approach to opposition. By saying Peter Obi has “crossed the line” and implying that he deserves consequences, Morka’s words can be perceived as threatening and intimidating. His remark, particularly the phrase, “he has coming to him whatever he gets,” has been widely condemned as a thinly veiled threat to Obi’s life and safety.

Morka’s statement, which has sent shockwaves across Nigeria, reads: “Peter Obi Has Crossed the Line So Many Times and Whatever He Gets Let Him Take It”

This ominous warning highlights the broader issue of the politicization of institutions in Nigeria and the culture of impunity among those in power. It underscores a disturbing reality where some politicians appear to believe they control law enforcement and the judiciary, allowing them to make reckless statements without consequence. Such behavior disregards the duty to uphold the rule of law and protect democratic values.

The case of Peter Obi, a national and global figure as an opposition leader, exemplifies this troubling trend. As the former Labour Party presidential candidate, Obi has already expressed concerns about the threats he’s received following his criticism of President Bola Tinubu’s administration. His resolute commitment to democratic values and the rule of law is commendable, but it also highlights the urgent need for Nigerian authorities to ensure the safety of opposition figures and uphold democratic principles.

In a functioning democracy, the protection of opposition voices is crucial to maintaining political balance and safeguarding citizens’ rights. The Nigerian government must demonstrate its commitment to these principles by taking threats against opposition leaders seriously and holding those responsible for threatening remarks accountable. The safety and freedom of individuals like Peter Obi should be a priority, as their contributions are vital to Nigeria’s democratic process and international reputation.

As a forensic psychologist, it is clear that Morka’s language fosters an environment that undermines Nigeria’s democratic values. Threatening rhetoric from government officials can create a toxic atmosphere where dissent is suppressed, and violence is implicitly condoned. It is essential for government representatives to promote constructive dialogue and respect opposing views to maintain the country’s democratic fabric.

The Role of the Police and DSS in Addressing Threats

In a fully democratic and effective criminal justice system, individuals making threatening statements would face consequences. The Nigerian Police Force and the Department of State Services (DSS) have a responsibility to investigate and prosecute such cases to maintain law and order. The Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and the Criminal Code provide frameworks for addressing threatening statements, balancing freedom of speech with accountability.

However, in a society where institutions are politicized, individuals like Felix Morka may feel emboldened to make such statements without fear of repercussions. The police and judiciary, often compromised by political interference, risk becoming tools for those in power rather than protectors of justice. This environment of impunity encourages abuse of power and fosters corruption.

Morka’s statement reflects this broader problem. His confidence in making threatening remarks without fear of consequences is symptomatic of the politicization of institutions. The police and DSS must remember their primary duty is to uphold the law and protect citizens, not serve the interests of politicians. Law enforcement agencies must stop obstructing justice and fulfill their constitutional duties by holding individuals like Morka accountable.

Protecting Peter Obi: A Litmus Test for Nigeria’s Democracy

Nigerians and the international community have expressed growing concerns about the safety of Peter Obi, who many believe won the presidential election but was denied victory due to alleged manipulations. The threat issued by Felix Morka only adds fuel to this fire, raising questions about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy and human rights.

The issue at hand is not merely about whether Felix Morka will personally harm Peter Obi or his family tomorrow. It is about the dangerous precedent that statements like his set in a global, digital world. The world heard his words through televised comments, and in this age of instant communication, such remarks have far-reaching consequences. Dangerous people, copycats, or those looking for justification for violence may act on these statements. This is why it is imperative for law enforcement to intervene immediately, not to accuse Morka of a direct threat but to clarify his intentions and prevent any unintended consequences.

The authorities should pick up Morka for questioning and make it clear that such rhetoric is unacceptable in a democracy. By speaking to him, they can clarify the intent behind his words, assess any risks, and send a message that such statements will not be taken lightly. This would not only safeguard Peter Obi but also reinforce the importance of responsible communication by public officials.

Providing protection for Peter Obi is not only a matter of personal safety but a critical test of Nigeria’s democratic values. Failure to act decisively would send a dangerous message to the world that opposition voices can be silenced through threats and intimidation. The government must ensure that threats against opposition figures are taken seriously and that those making such statements are held accountable for their words.

The Role of the International Community

The international community, including the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and other donors, has a crucial role to play in supporting Peter Obi’s right to freedom of speech and expression. These countries have consistently emphasized democratic values, human rights, and the rule of law in their diplomatic engagements with Nigeria. By standing with Obi, they can reinforce these principles and promote a stable political environment.

International organizations and human rights groups should also closely monitor Obi’s situation. Public condemnation of Morka’s threats and diplomatic pressure on the Nigerian government can help ensure Obi’s safety and send a message that such rhetoric will not be tolerated.

Civil Society’s Role in Promoting Accountability

Civil society organizations, including human rights groups and democracy advocates, must rally around Peter Obi and demand accountability from the Nigerian government. These organizations play a crucial role in promoting transparency, holding leaders accountable, and advocating for citizens’ rights.

By standing in solidarity with Obi, civil society can:

Raise awareness by bringing national and international attention to the threats against Obi and the broader issues of political intimidation in Nigeria. Advocate for institutional reforms to strengthen the independence of the police and judiciary. Foster a culture of tolerance, dialogue, and respect for opposing views.

Steps for Law Enforcement Agencies

1. Investigate Felix Morka’s Statement

The first step for the Nigerian authorities, particularly the police and DSS, is to launch an investigation into Felix Morka’s statement to assess its severity and potential impact. This involves analyzing the context, content, and intent of his remarks to determine if they constitute a direct threat to Peter Obi or encourage violence against opposition figures.

A thorough investigation will ensure that Morka’s words are not left open to interpretation by dangerous individuals who may act on them. It will also provide clarity on whether Morka’s statement violates any existing laws, such as provisions in the Criminal Code or the Cybercrime Act.

It is worth noting that Felix Morka is a lawyer and a member of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). As a licensed legal professional, he is expected to uphold the rule of law and maintain high ethical standards in his public conduct. The silence from the leadership of the NBA, particularly its president, on this matter is concerning. The association must address the behavior of one of its members who has made statements perceived as threatening. The NBA has a responsibility to ensure that its members do not use their legal expertise or platform to intimidate or undermine democratic principles.

It is important to clarify that this writer makes no personal attack on Felix Morka. The intention is not to vilify him as an individual but to address the concerning nature of his public statements and the implications they carry in a democratic society. Furthermore, the writer has no personal or professional relationship with any of the individuals involved in this situation. The observations made herein are rooted in a commitment to democratic principles, rule of law, and accountability in governance.

2. Prosecute Under Relevant Laws

If the investigation finds sufficient evidence, Morka should be prosecuted under applicable laws. The Nigerian Criminal Code and the Cybercrime Act both contain provisions that criminalize threats, incitement to violence, and the use of harmful language that could endanger individuals or public safety.

Prosecuting Morka would send a strong message that no one is above the law, regardless of their political affiliation. It would also demonstrate that threatening language aimed at silencing opposition voices will not be tolerated in Nigeria’s democratic framework.

3. Ensure Accountability and Consequences

Beyond prosecution, it is essential that the Nigerian authorities ensure Morka faces appropriate consequences for his actions. This could include penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offense and the evidence presented.

Holding Morka accountable will reinforce the rule of law in Nigeria and discourage other political figures from making similar threatening statements. It will also restore public confidence in the impartiality and effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, which is critical for maintaining peace and stability in the country.

Clarify Morka’s Intent Through Questioning

The police and DSS have a duty to bring Morka in for questioning to clarify his intent behind the threatening remarks. While no one is suggesting that Morka himself will harm Peter Obi or his family, the world has heard his words through televised comments, and such dangerous rhetoric can inspire copycats or individuals with harmful intentions.

Bringing Morka in for questioning would allow law enforcement to assess whether his statement was made recklessly or with malicious intent. It would also give Morka the opportunity to clarify his words and potentially issue a public retraction or apology, which could help defuse tensions.

The threat issued by Felix Morka against Peter Obi is a wake-up call for Nigerians and the international community. It highlights the urgent need to protect democracy, human rights, and the rule of law in Nigeria. The lack of any public response from the police or DSS, more than 24 hours after Morka’s alarming comments, raises serious questions about law enforcement’s impartiality and accountability.

Silence from these institutions signals a dangerous precedent, especially in a time where threats spread rapidly in the digital age. The police and DSS must act decisively to hold Morka accountable, provide security for Obi, and demonstrate their commitment to justice.

Ultimately, the protection of Peter Obi’s life and safety is a litmus test for Nigeria’s democracy. The government and international partners must act swiftly to ensure Obi receives the protection he deserves and that the rule of law prevails in Nigeria. The police and DSS have a duty to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities and protect not just Peter Obi, but Nigeria’s democratic values from being eroded by intimidation and threats.