God forbid that something happens to Peter Obi. The consequences would be catastrophic. Nigeria’s political stability would be at risk, and the country’s image on the global stage would be severely damaged. The stark contrast in how Nigerian law enforcement treats , Felix Morka, the National Spokesperson of the All Progressives Congress (APC), and Rights Activist Olamide Thomas exposes a troubling double standard in the country’s justice system. Morka’s statement, a politically charged threat against Peter Obi, was made publicly on a national platform. Yet, the silence from the police and DSS is deafening, despite the clear danger posed to Obi’s life and Nigeria’s democratic stability. Meanwhile, Olamide Thomas was swiftly arrested, detained, and arraigned for making juju or spiritual remarks that, while unsettling, were symbolic and culturally rooted rather than criminal.

Why is a direct threat to a prominent opposition leader ignored, while an activist making culturally driven remarks faces severe legal repercussions? This disparity highlights the politicization of law enforcement and the judiciary, where those in power use state institutions to silence critics and protect their interests. The message is clear: political figures with connections are shielded from consequences, while ordinary citizens or government critics face swift and harsh punishment.

Olamide Abiodun Thomas, a human rights activist, was arrested and arraigned on charges stemming from remarks made in a viral social media post. These remarks were directed at Seyi Tinubu, the son of President Bola Tinubu, as well as top police officials, including the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun and Police Public Relations Officer Muyiwa Adejobi. In her post, Thomas allegedly made spiritual or cultural statements, wishing misfortune and calamity upon these individuals. One of the charges against her specifically references a remark made in Yoruba language stating that Seyi Tinubu would die within the year and that misfortune had befallen the Tinubu family.

Despite the cultural context of her statements, Thomas was swiftly arrested, detained for weeks, and charged under the Cybercrimes Act. Her remarks, perceived as voodoo-like wishes or spiritual curses, were treated as criminal offenses with severe legal consequences. This case highlights the swift action taken by Nigerian law enforcement when statements are perceived as threats against those in power, contrasting starkly with their inaction in the case of Felix Morka’s direct threat against Peter Obi.

The case of Olamide Thomas underscores this inconsistency. Her statements, though perceived as spiritual curses, are deeply rooted in cultural beliefs. Such remarks could have been met with a symbolic response like “back to the sender,” a common Nigerian phrase. Instead, Thomas was detained for weeks, charged, and denied bail, raising serious questions about the proportionality of the response. It highlights the civil and somewhat comical nature of her remarks, which were blown out of proportion by law enforcement, further showcasing the selective application of justice.

In contrast, Felix Morka’s words — a direct threat against Peter Obi — have not resulted in any legal action. This glaring inconsistency reveals the selective application of justice in Nigeria. By allowing Morka to walk free while punishing Thomas, the government risks eroding public trust in democratic institutions and fostering a culture of impunity.

The Inspector General of Police and other security authorities  have a constitutional duty to protect all Nigerians, regardless of their political affiliations. They must invite Morka for questioning to clarify his intent and hold him accountable for his statements. Failure to do so sends a dangerous message: threats to opposition leaders are acceptable, and those in power are above the law.

To safeguard Nigeria’s democracy, law enforcement must act with consistency and fairness. Threats, whether symbolic or direct, must be addressed with equal urgency. Protecting opposition leaders like Peter Obi is not just about personal safety but a litmus test for Nigeria’s commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law.

The warning signs are clear, and the dangers are real. History has shown that ignoring threats to opposition leaders can have devastating consequences. God forbid something happens to Peter Obi — the question will linger: Why didn’t the authorities act when they had the chance? The time for action is now, before the damage becomes irreversible.

The Consequences of Inaction: A Catastrophe Waiting to Happen

God forbid that something happens to Peter Obi. The consequences would be tragic. Nigeria’s political stability would be in jeopardy, and the country’s image on the global stage would be severely dented.

History has shown us that political violence and assassinations can lead to long-term instability. The killing of an opposition leader like Peter Obi would not only cause widespread outrage but could also spark violence and unrest across the country. The social, political, and economic consequences would be devastating.

By taking proactive measures now, the authorities can prevent a potential tragedy and uphold Nigeria’s democratic values.

The international community is closely observing Nigeria. Human rights organizations, foreign governments, and global media outlets are paying heightened attention to the country’s political climate. The safety of opposition leaders is a fundamental pillar of any functioning democracy, and the world is watching how Nigeria handles this critical issue.

Failure by Nigeria’s law enforcement agencies to address the threat against Peter Obi would send a damaging message: that the safety of political leaders is not a priority and that threats to opposition voices can be tolerated. Such inaction could have severe consequences for Nigeria’s diplomatic relations and tarnish its international reputation.

The time for empty rhetoric has passed. The authorities must take immediate, decisive steps to address Felix Morka’s alarming statement. This should include inviting Morka for questioning to clarify his intent and assess any potential risks, providing 24/7 enhanced security for Peter Obi and his family to ensure their protection, and publicly reaffirming the government’s unwavering commitment to safeguarding opposition leaders. These actions are essential to restoring public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic institutions and demonstrating that the rule of law applies to all.

Nigerians from every sector must unite to demand accountability. Civil society organizations, human rights advocates, and concerned citizens must hold the authorities responsible for taking swift and fair action. It is no longer enough to observe from the sidelines; collective action is essential to preserve democracy.

Felix Morka’s statement is not just a political issue—it is a matter of national security. The authorities must act now to prevent any harm to Peter Obi and to uphold the principles that underpin Nigeria’s democracy. The cost of inaction would be immeasurable.

God forbid something happens to Peter Obi. If the unthinkable were to occur, the question would echo through history: Why didn’t the authorities intervene when they had the chance? The time to act is not tomorrow or next week—it is now, before it is too late.

[OpinionNigeria]