Admin

Admin

The Chairman of Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof Mahmood Yakubu, recently praised the resilience of Ghana politicians, like (part-time Nigerian and) former President John Mahama, who remained with his party despite losing the 2017 presidential election, until he was re-elected President of Ghana two weeks ago.

Yakubu observed: “Rarely in Ghana do you see people moving from one party to another with every general election… It provides stability. It also provides their supporters (with) stability. So, there are people who have supported political parties for years. So, whether the party is in power or opposition, they stick to the political party.”

The professor is probably unaware of former Cross River State Governor Donald Duke’s opinion that Nigeria did not quite have political parties in the classical sense, but some kind of special-purpose vehicles used by politicians to get political offices.

Maybe the strength of the Ghana electoral process is in the provision for independent candidates in its Constitution, which also does not require candidates to belong to or be presented by political parties to contest elections. An independent candidate won a parliamentary seat in Ghana’s 2020 general elections.

Another possible cause of the stability of Ghana’s political parties is that independent candidates, who obviously do not belong to the ruling party or the main opposition political party, can become principal officers in Ghana’s legislature.

These two allowances may be the reason Ghanaian politicians do not cross the political carpet. In the 8th parliament of Ghana’s Fourth Republic, Asaimah Iddrisu, an independent candidate, became a minority leader, instead of a member of the main opposition, the National Democratic Congress.

In Britain, Betty Boothroyd and Michael Martin, members of the Labour Party, served as Speaker whereas the Prime Minister was a member of the Conservative Party. Also, John Bercow of the Conservative Party was Speaker of the parliament under Labour and Conservative prime ministers.

The Chairman of the British Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee, which ensures scrutiny, accountability and oversight checks over public expenditure and the government’s financial management, is usually appointed from the opposition party.

Even if the appointment of Prof Yakubu as INEC Chairman will prevent him from counselling Nigeria’s National Assembly to amend the Constitution to allow independent candidates to contest for public offices, his pedigree as a professor of history and international relations should persuade him to tutor them on the expediency of such an act.

His specialisation in guerrilla warfare would have adequately prepared him to survive the treacherous terrain of messing around with the constitutional device that protects the privileges of members of Nigeria’s political establishment.

Nigeria’s political elite has cleverly woven Sections 65(2b), 106(b), 131(c) and 177(c) into the Constitution so that “A person shall be qualified for election… as (federal legislator, state legislator, President of Nigeria and State Governor only) if he is a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party.”

Nigeria’s political parties have become a quilt of secret societies and political cartels that dispense political offices as privileges to anointed vassals, who will play ball as dictated. That anointing system is aptly captured in the Yoruba phrase, “Baba so’pe”, or the big boss has proclaimed.

In addition to commending “the process and the outcome so far”, and pledging “to continue to support our colleagues in Ghana’s Electoral Commission”, Prof Yakubu attributed the success of the election to Ghana’s adoption of Nigeria’s system of announcing election results at the constituency level.

Hitherto, election results throughout Ghana, be they presidential or legislative, were forwarded to the headquarters of the Ghana Electoral Commission in Accra, from where they will be centrally announced to Ghanaians.

 

Of what special value is the announcement of election results at the constituency level? Perhaps collation and announcement of results at the constituency level may prevent scoundrels from switching election results before they get to the Accra headquarters of the Ghana Electoral Commission.

But that is not really something to beat the chest about; there is no big deal about where election results are announced, especially in a country like Ghana, with a population of a mere 35 million citizens, in a small land area of 239,567 square kilometres.

Some think that Prof Yakubu’s much ado about nothing concerning Ghana’s successful election was just a ploy to divert attention from the institutional weaknesses of his INEC, which has generally held disputed elections.

Prof Yakubu must find a way to erase INEC’s liability of trust deficit by striving to conduct, especially presidential and gubernatorial, elections in a more credible manner and to the satisfaction of the electorate and the candidates.

It is a shame that candidates need court judgements to validate the elections they fought for and won through expensive and sometimes violent political campaigns. Unfortunately, the need for the judiciary to validate election results comes with its own challenges.

Apart from practically compromising the operations of democratic processes—from party memberships to party primaries, elections, collations, announcements and swearing-in of winners of elections—it turns the spotlight on judicial officers.

Unfortunately, many of the judges, who have been compromised by the temptations dangled at them by the political elites who want to be in elective offices by all means, have lost the dignity and self-respect associated with their offices.

It is a matter of grave regret that the judiciary, the temple of justice, is so morally challenged that it almost commands no iota of respect from within its hallowed chambers or among the citizens who have to bear the brunt of a system that delivers judgement without justice.

The other day, the new Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, felt so challenged that she was compelled to practically make an undertaking that her Supreme Court, and the National Judicial Council that she heads, shall actively look for ways to sanitise the judiciary system.

That is commendable, and it shows that the judiciary that she wants to lead will be a listening and sensitive one, though it is in the enlightened best interest of their lordships to run a clean stable. If the judiciary regains its respect, the consequence will be an ability to deliver and guarantee the rule of law upon which Nigeria’s democracy will rest.

Nigerians of the older generation remember, with fond nostalgia, judiciary icons, like Justices Kayode Esho, Chukwudife Oputa, Louis Mbanefo, Akinola Aguda, Darnley Alexander, Mustapha Akanbi, Augustine Nnamani, Olakunle Orojo, Idowu Conrad Taylor and Rosaline Omotosho, who all made indelible marks in the delivery of justice in Nigeria.

Of course, Nigerians also remember those judges who awarded the twelve two-thirds judgment to a preferred presidential candidate and those who brought a governorship candidate from a fourth position right to the first, to become a substantive two-term governor of a state!

If Prof Yakubu’s INEC handles its part of the election exercise without blemish, election contestants will not need to approach the courts for “unnecessary begging” for justice. A lot depends on the INEC, to whom so much financial and moral resources are entrusted.

Above all, the moral weight upon whoever is the chairman of INEC is probably heavier than that on the chief justice of the federation when it comes to elections. If INEC impeccably does its job, their lordships will have no place in the electoral arena.

 

 

It is crucial to emphasize that this writer holds no personal or political ties to any of the individuals involved. The focus is solely on the advancement and preservation of democratic principles across Africa. Safeguarding human rights, promoting political accountability, and protecting opposition figures from threats and intimidation are essential components of a functioning democracy.

 

In a concerning turn of events, Felix Morka, the National Spokesperson for Nigeria’s ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), made a statement that has sparked widespread alarm. His comment that Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s Presidential Candidate, has “crossed the line so many times, and whatever he gets let him take it” is perceived as a direct threat to Obi’s life. This chilling statement underscores the urgent need for both national and international intervention to safeguard Obi’s safety and protect Nigeria’s democracy from escalating political violence.

This is not an isolated incident. The statement came after Obi, in his New Year message, delivered a scathing critique of President Bola Tinubu’s government. In his speech, Obi highlighted the severe economic pain, mass hunger, insecurity, lack of due process, and systemic oppression plaguing Nigeria under the current administration. He vowed to continue speaking the truth and holding the government accountable, even stating that he is ready to die for the cause of truth and justice. In what appears to be a strategic move, Obi’s bold stance seems to have set a trap for the APC, with Morka’s threatening remarks falling right into it.

The Threat to Democracy: Morka’s Incendiary Statement

 

Morka’s statement on Arise TV goes beyond political rhetoric and crosses into dangerous territory. It sends a message that dissent is punishable by violence, a clear threat to the core democratic values of free speech and political opposition. His remarks insinuate that Obi, for speaking out against government failures, deserves harm—a dangerous precedent in any democratic society.

Obi’s New Year message resonated with millions of Nigerians who are enduring harsh economic realities, rising insecurity, and increasing government oppression. His willingness to stand as a voice for the people, even at the risk of his life, demonstrates his unwavering commitment to truth and democratic principles. However, the response from the APC spokesperson exposes the intolerance of the ruling party toward dissenting voices.

The Nigerian government must take immediate action to investigate Morka’s comments and ensure Obi’s safety. Failure to do so would send a signal that threats against opposition figures are acceptable, further eroding Nigeria’s fragile democracy.

 

The Role of the Nigerian Government: Protecting Democratic Integrity

The Tinubu administration must demonstrate its commitment to democracy by taking decisive steps to protect Peter Obi and hold Morka accountable for his words. Providing round-the-clock security for Obi is a necessity, not a luxury. Additionally, the Nigerian Police Force and the Department of State Services (DSS) must investigate Morka’s statement under the Criminal Code or Cybercrime Act. His remarks must not be dismissed as political banter but treated as a serious incitement to violence.

Furthermore, the APC must suspend Morka from his role as National Spokesperson. The party needs to send a clear message that it does not condone threats or intimidation. Failing to do so would indicate that the ruling party endorses a culture of fear and repression, undermining democratic dialogue and civil discourse.

 

International Intervention: A Global Responsibility

The international community must not turn a blind eye to the escalating threats against Peter Obi and the broader attacks on Nigeria’s democracy. Key actors, including ECOWAS, the United Nations, the European Union, and countries like the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Germany, have a responsibility to intervene.

Condemning Morka’s threats publicly and urging Nigerian authorities to ensure Obi’s safety will reinforce the global commitment to democratic norms and human rights. Advocacy groups and human rights organizations must also step in to keep the situation in the global spotlight and ensure that no harm comes to Obi.

 

Peter Obi’s willingness to call out government failures at great personal risk must be met with equal resolve from the global community to protect him. Silence would embolden those who seek to use threats and violence to stifle opposition voices.

ECOWAS: A Regional Responsibility

As the leading regional body in West Africa, ECOWAS must take an active stance in this situation. Issuing a formal statement condemning the threats against Obi and offering mediation between political factions would reinforce its role in maintaining peace and stability in the region. Allowing threats and intimidation against political figures in one member state could set a dangerous precedent for instability across the region.

 

The Role of NGOs and Human Rights Organizations

NGOs and human rights organizations must amplify the call for justice. Media campaigns, public statements, and advocacy efforts can apply pressure on Nigerian authorities to take necessary actions to protect Obi. These organizations must demand that legal actions be taken against Morka and any other individuals making similar threats.

By advocating for the protection of opposition leaders and democratic institutions, NGOs help foster a culture of political dialogue and tolerance, rather than one of threats and intimidation.

Peter Obi’s Safety: A Litmus Test for Nigeria’s Democracy

The threats against Peter Obi are more than just a personal attack; they represent a critical juncture for Nigeria’s democracy. The Tinubu administration’s response to these threats will be a litmus test of its commitment to protecting democratic values and human rights.

Providing security for Obi, investigating the threats, and holding Morka accountable are essential steps to demonstrate that Nigeria values democratic principles. Failure to take these actions will signal that the country condones political violence and intimidation, damaging its democratic credentials on the global stage.

 
A Call to Action: The World is Watching

Peter Obi’s life is at risk because he dared to speak the truth about the failures of the Tinubu administration. Morka’s threat on Arise TV highlights the dangerous undercurrent of repression within Nigerian politics.

This moment requires immediate action from Nigerian authorities, regional bodies like ECOWAS, and the global community. The protection of Obi’s life is more than a security issue—it is a statement about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

 

Nigeria stands at a critical crossroads. The government’s response to Morka’s incendiary statement will determine whether it upholds democratic principles or allows political intimidation and impunity to deepen. It has now been more than 24 hours since Peter Obi, in his own words, raised alarm over threats to his life, his family, and his close associates: “My New Year message has now led to threats against my life, my family, and those around me.” By now, the Inspector General of Police, the Director of the DSS (Department of State Services), and the Director of the NIA (National Intelligence Agency) should have urgently summoned Felix Morka for a legal interrogation to clarify his threatening statements. 

Obi, as a national opposition leader and a recognized global figure, represents a powerful symbol of democratic resistance in Nigeria. Ensuring his safety is not just a national obligation but a global priority. At this point, Felix Morka, who has continued making media appearances despite his incendiary remarks, should be temporarily suspended from his role as the ruling party’s spokesperson. Allowing him to continue in this capacity without consequence only fuels the perception that such threats are acceptable. He should be barred from public statements in his official position until authorities have conducted a thorough investigation and clarified the legal implications of his comments.

It is crucial to emphasize that this writer holds no personal or political ties to any of the individuals involved. The focus is solely on the advancement and preservation of democratic principles across Africa. Safeguarding human rights, promoting political accountability, and protecting opposition figures from threats and intimidation are essential components of a functioning democracy.

 

Failure to address this issue decisively would send a dangerous message both within Nigeria and to the international community: that threats against political opponents are tolerated. Such inaction risks deepening instability and further eroding trust in Nigeria’s institutions. The government must act swiftly to prevent any escalation that could have long-term consequences. Protecting political dissent and upholding democratic integrity are essential steps toward securing the nation’s future. The time to act is now.

The administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been marked by a curious dichotomy: while the country faces an avalanche of economic challenges, his policies and decisions seem to disproportionately favor those already ensconced in privilege. Recent actions, such as the approval of extravagant retirement benefits for military generals and a 300% pay hike for judicial officers, juxtapose starkly against the dire realities faced by the average Nigerian. This raises a poignant question: “Why is Tinubu empowering the “haves” while the “have-nots” remain neglected and burdened by hardship?”

The newly approved terms for retired generals offer a stark example of how the administration prioritizes the elite. Bulletproof SUVs, fully-funded foreign medical trips, and substantial annual estacodes are now part of their retirement packages. These benefits, which include domestic aides, residential guards, and luxurious vehicles, are an unprecedented windfall for a group already accustomed to privilege during their service years.

While one might argue that military service deserves recognition, it is important to remember that these generals served in roles that already afforded them immense perks. Their salaries, allowances, and privileges while in service were far beyond what most Nigerians could dream of. Is it fair, then, to elevate their privileges even further when the masses are struggling to afford basic necessities?

 

In the same breath, Tinubu has approved a 300% salary increase for judicial officers. While improved welfare for the judiciary is commendable and necessary for an independent justice system, the timing and scale of this increment raise eyebrows. The Chief Justice of Nigeria is now entitled to an annual salary of N64 million, with other judicial leaders earning slightly less. These figures are astronomical when compared to the N70, 000 minimum wage recently enacted for ordinary workers, a wage that many still find insufficient given the soaring cost of living, and also given the fact that all Nigerians are doing salary jobs. 

Justice may be the hope of the common man, but how does this hope translate to reality when judicial officers are cloistered in privilege while the people they serve face unbearable economic pressures? Is this truly a system that values equity, or is it yet another example of resources being disproportionately funneled to the top?

While the elites are receiving bulletproof SUVs and millions in salaries, the average Nigerian is grappling with skyrocketing inflation, unaffordable food prices, and a crumbling healthcare system. Public schools are in shambles, unemployment remains a persistent scourge, and millions live below the poverty line. Tinubu’s administration has introduced fuel subsidy removal and floated the naira, policies that have further eroded the purchasing power of the average citizen. Palliatives meant to cushion these impacts have largely failed to reach the intended recipients, leaving many Nigerians to wonder if their suffering is even acknowledged.

 

At a bus stop in Lagos, a 60-year-old man recently lamented, “I have never seen hardship like this in my life.” His words resonate with millions who feel abandoned by a government that seems more interested in appeasing the powerful than addressing the plight of the powerless.

The empowerment of the elite at the expense of the masses is not just morally questionable, it is also politically unwise. History has shown that when governments ignore the grievances of the majority, they sow the seeds of discontent and unrest. Nigeria has already seen protests and strikes over the harsh economic realities imposed by Tinubu’s policies. How much more strain can the people endure before the situation reaches a boiling point?

The administration’s actions also send a troubling message about governance. By prioritizing the welfare of the privileged, Tinubu risks deepening the divide between the government and the governed. This disconnect can erode trust, alienate the citizenry, and undermine the legitimacy of his leadership.

 

To govern a nation as diverse and complex as Nigeria requires a delicate balance between addressing the needs of the elite and uplifting the majority. While it is essential to incentivize critical sectors like the military and judiciary, these efforts must not overshadow the urgent need to alleviate poverty, improve public services, and create opportunities for ordinary citizens.

President Tinubu must ask himself whose interests he truly serves. Is he a president for all Nigerians or just for the privileged few? If his administration continues to prioritize the “haves” at the expense of the “have-nots,” it risks perpetuating a system that is inherently unjust and unsustainable.

The administration must urgently recalibrate its priorities. Thus, some actionable steps Tinubu can take to address this imbalance cut across reviewing elite benefits, strengthening social safety nets, investing in public services and engaging the citizenry. 

 

In fact, while the military and judiciary deserve fair compensation, there should be a limit to the extravagance of their benefits. Resources saved from trimming these perks can be redirected to social welfare programs.

In a similar vein, palliatives must reach those who need them most. Implementing transparent and accountable systems for distributing subsidies and aid will help restore faith in governance, while education, healthcare, and infrastructure must be prioritized to create a foundation for long-term growth and equity.

Again, Tinubu’s administration must communicate its policies clearly and demonstrate a genuine commitment to addressing the concerns of ordinary Nigerians.

 

President Tinubu’s legacy will be shaped by the choices he makes in these critical early years of his administration. He has the opportunity to be remembered as a leader who bridged the gap between the elite and the masses, fostering a more equitable and prosperous Nigeria. However, if he continues to empower the privileged at the expense of the vulnerable, his presidency may be marked as a missed opportunity to unite and uplift the nation.

It is time for Tinubu to heed the cries of the “have-nots” and create a Nigeria that truly works for all. Only then can he claim to be a president of the people, for the people, and by the people.

 

The recent statement by Felix Morka, the APC national spokesperson, has indeed raised concerns about the government’s approach to opposition. By saying Peter Obi has “crossed the line” and implying that he deserves consequences, Morka’s words can be perceived as threatening and intimidating. His remark, particularly the phrase, “he has coming to him whatever he gets,” has been widely condemned as a thinly veiled threat to Obi’s life and safety.

Morka’s statement, which has sent shockwaves across Nigeria, reads: “Peter Obi Has Crossed the Line So Many Times and Whatever He Gets Let Him Take It”

This ominous warning highlights the broader issue of the politicization of institutions in Nigeria and the culture of impunity among those in power. It underscores a disturbing reality where some politicians appear to believe they control law enforcement and the judiciary, allowing them to make reckless statements without consequence. Such behavior disregards the duty to uphold the rule of law and protect democratic values.

 

The case of Peter Obi, a national and global figure as an opposition leader, exemplifies this troubling trend. As the former Labour Party presidential candidate, Obi has already expressed concerns about the threats he’s received following his criticism of President Bola Tinubu’s administration. His resolute commitment to democratic values and the rule of law is commendable, but it also highlights the urgent need for Nigerian authorities to ensure the safety of opposition figures and uphold democratic principles.

In a functioning democracy, the protection of opposition voices is crucial to maintaining political balance and safeguarding citizens’ rights. The Nigerian government must demonstrate its commitment to these principles by taking threats against opposition leaders seriously and holding those responsible for threatening remarks accountable. The safety and freedom of individuals like Peter Obi should be a priority, as their contributions are vital to Nigeria’s democratic process and international reputation.

As a forensic psychologist, it is clear that Morka’s language fosters an environment that undermines Nigeria’s democratic values. Threatening rhetoric from government officials can create a toxic atmosphere where dissent is suppressed, and violence is implicitly condoned. It is essential for government representatives to promote constructive dialogue and respect opposing views to maintain the country’s democratic fabric.

 

The Role of the Police and DSS in Addressing Threats

In a fully democratic and effective criminal justice system, individuals making threatening statements would face consequences. The Nigerian Police Force and the Department of State Services (DSS) have a responsibility to investigate and prosecute such cases to maintain law and order. The Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and the Criminal Code provide frameworks for addressing threatening statements, balancing freedom of speech with accountability.

However, in a society where institutions are politicized, individuals like Felix Morka may feel emboldened to make such statements without fear of repercussions. The police and judiciary, often compromised by political interference, risk becoming tools for those in power rather than protectors of justice. This environment of impunity encourages abuse of power and fosters corruption.

 

Morka’s statement reflects this broader problem. His confidence in making threatening remarks without fear of consequences is symptomatic of the politicization of institutions. The police and DSS must remember their primary duty is to uphold the law and protect citizens, not serve the interests of politicians. Law enforcement agencies must stop obstructing justice and fulfill their constitutional duties by holding individuals like Morka accountable.

Protecting Peter Obi: A Litmus Test for Nigeria’s Democracy

Nigerians and the international community have expressed growing concerns about the safety of Peter Obi, who many believe won the presidential election but was denied victory due to alleged manipulations. The threat issued by Felix Morka only adds fuel to this fire, raising questions about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy and human rights.

 

The issue at hand is not merely about whether Felix Morka will personally harm Peter Obi or his family tomorrow. It is about the dangerous precedent that statements like his set in a global, digital world. The world heard his words through televised comments, and in this age of instant communication, such remarks have far-reaching consequences. Dangerous people, copycats, or those looking for justification for violence may act on these statements. This is why it is imperative for law enforcement to intervene immediately, not to accuse Morka of a direct threat but to clarify his intentions and prevent any unintended consequences.

The authorities should pick up Morka for questioning and make it clear that such rhetoric is unacceptable in a democracy. By speaking to him, they can clarify the intent behind his words, assess any risks, and send a message that such statements will not be taken lightly. This would not only safeguard Peter Obi but also reinforce the importance of responsible communication by public officials.

Providing protection for Peter Obi is not only a matter of personal safety but a critical test of Nigeria’s democratic values. Failure to act decisively would send a dangerous message to the world that opposition voices can be silenced through threats and intimidation. The government must ensure that threats against opposition figures are taken seriously and that those making such statements are held accountable for their words.

 

The Role of the International Community

The international community, including the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and other donors, has a crucial role to play in supporting Peter Obi’s right to freedom of speech and expression. These countries have consistently emphasized democratic values, human rights, and the rule of law in their diplomatic engagements with Nigeria. By standing with Obi, they can reinforce these principles and promote a stable political environment.

International organizations and human rights groups should also closely monitor Obi’s situation. Public condemnation of Morka’s threats and diplomatic pressure on the Nigerian government can help ensure Obi’s safety and send a message that such rhetoric will not be tolerated.

 

Civil Society’s Role in Promoting Accountability

Civil society organizations, including human rights groups and democracy advocates, must rally around Peter Obi and demand accountability from the Nigerian government. These organizations play a crucial role in promoting transparency, holding leaders accountable, and advocating for citizens’ rights.

By standing in solidarity with Obi, civil society can:

 

Raise awareness by bringing national and international attention to the threats against Obi and the broader issues of political intimidation in Nigeria. Advocate for institutional reforms to strengthen the independence of the police and judiciary. Foster a culture of tolerance, dialogue, and respect for opposing views.

Steps for Law Enforcement Agencies

  1. Investigate Felix Morka’s Statement

The first step for the Nigerian authorities, particularly the police and DSS, is to launch an investigation into Felix Morka’s statement to assess its severity and potential impact. This involves analyzing the context, content, and intent of his remarks to determine if they constitute a direct threat to Peter Obi or encourage violence against opposition figures.

A thorough investigation will ensure that Morka’s words are not left open to interpretation by dangerous individuals who may act on them. It will also provide clarity on whether Morka’s statement violates any existing laws, such as provisions in the Criminal Code or the Cybercrime Act.

 

It is worth noting that Felix Morka is a lawyer and a member of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). As a licensed legal professional, he is expected to uphold the rule of law and maintain high ethical standards in his public conduct. The silence from the leadership of the NBA, particularly its president, on this matter is concerning. The association must address the behavior of one of its members who has made statements perceived as threatening. The NBA has a responsibility to ensure that its members do not use their legal expertise or platform to intimidate or undermine democratic principles.

It is important to clarify that this writer makes no personal attack on Felix Morka. The intention is not to vilify him as an individual but to address the concerning nature of his public statements and the implications they carry in a democratic society. Furthermore, the writer has no personal or professional relationship with any of the individuals involved in this situation. The observations made herein are rooted in a commitment to democratic principles, rule of law, and accountability in governance.

  1. Prosecute Under Relevant Laws

If the investigation finds sufficient evidence, Morka should be prosecuted under applicable laws. The Nigerian Criminal Code and the Cybercrime Act both contain provisions that criminalize threats, incitement to violence, and the use of harmful language that could endanger individuals or public safety.

 

Prosecuting Morka would send a strong message that no one is above the law, regardless of their political affiliation. It would also demonstrate that threatening language aimed at silencing opposition voices will not be tolerated in Nigeria’s democratic framework.

  1. Ensure Accountability and Consequences

Beyond prosecution, it is essential that the Nigerian authorities ensure Morka faces appropriate consequences for his actions. This could include penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offense and the evidence presented.

Holding Morka accountable will reinforce the rule of law in Nigeria and discourage other political figures from making similar threatening statements. It will also restore public confidence in the impartiality and effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, which is critical for maintaining peace and stability in the country.

Clarify Morka’s Intent Through Questioning

 

The police and DSS have a duty to bring Morka in for questioning to clarify his intent behind the threatening remarks. While no one is suggesting that Morka himself will harm Peter Obi or his family, the world has heard his words through televised comments, and such dangerous rhetoric can inspire copycats or individuals with harmful intentions.

Bringing Morka in for questioning would allow law enforcement to assess whether his statement was made recklessly or with malicious intent. It would also give Morka the opportunity to clarify his words and potentially issue a public retraction or apology, which could help defuse tensions.

The threat issued by Felix Morka against Peter Obi is a wake-up call for Nigerians and the international community. It highlights the urgent need to protect democracy, human rights, and the rule of law in Nigeria. The lack of any public response from the police or DSS, more than 24 hours after Morka’s alarming comments, raises serious questions about law enforcement’s impartiality and accountability.

 

Silence from these institutions signals a dangerous precedent, especially in a time where threats spread rapidly in the digital age. The police and DSS must act decisively to hold Morka accountable, provide security for Obi, and demonstrate their commitment to justice.

Ultimately, the protection of Peter Obi’s life and safety is a litmus test for Nigeria’s democracy. The government and international partners must act swiftly to ensure Obi receives the protection he deserves and that the rule of law prevails in Nigeria. The police and DSS have a duty to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities and protect not just Peter Obi, but Nigeria’s democratic values from being eroded by intimidation and threats.

During this past New Year’s celebration, l did something that has been on my bucket-list for ages – I took a long six-hour drive from Atlanta, to St. Simons Island in the State of Georgia, in the USA. The ardous task of the long drive was made bearable and pleasant, because I was accompanied by my wife Hadiza, and our twin sons, Aka and Arize. Our destination was the heritage and monument site named; The Igbo Landing in St. Simons Island near the sea port of Savannah, Georgia.

Over the years, I have read and listened to stories about this legendary story, and the vast and deeper meaning of the shared history to this global event of great tapestry and implication. I was intrigued and fascinated about this historical event, and began to wonder why such an epoch event and its relevance to world history has been denied most people. As I began to engage myself in some research and study about The lgbo Landing, I thought it was necessary to visit this site and dip the sole of my feet in the waters that swallowed the souls of those brave Igbo.

This sacred site that we visited, holds the nerve-shattering historical story of how in May of 1803, a large group of captured, kidnapped and enslaved Igbo resisted their enslavement in the most brave and dramatic way, when, inspired by a noble chief among them, they rose up in unison, and martyred themselves at Dunbar Creek on the Island of St. Simons. The slaves marching into the ocean were singing Igbo war songs, and chanting: “The Water brought us here… The Water will take us away…”. They all walked into the river, and drowned. These Igbo slaves embodied the mantra and the message that: You may enslave my body, but you will never be able to enslave my spirit and my soul. They all chose to die honourable deaths, instead of living lives worse than dying, in the cold cotton fields of the wicked and cruel white slave owners who in humiliating and dehumanizing them, profited from their blood, sweat and tears.

Upon arriving at the exact spot where this epic history took place, I was instantly overcome with an indescribable feeling of anxiety – my heart was beating with such rapidity that the pulsation sounded like a war-like drumbeat. The sound of my heartbeat filled the entire space in our car, alerting me to the fear that I may have betrayed my apparent lack of control of my emotions to my children. We stood transfixed at the entry point of the river, with my mind conjuring what may have transpired at the moment those brave Igbo fearlessly walked into their known demise. It is absolutely impossible to  accurately write down the countenance I felt. I had a mixed feeling of sadness and pride, as I fought back tears that had began to well up in my eyes. I began to compose and conjure silent prayers for the repose of the souls of those brave Igbo slaves. I asked God why he allowed so much sorrow and pain to befall the Igbo since creation, and why these horrors have persisted? I received no answers, but I kept praying, and pondering, and trying my best to conceal and contain the pain and tears that I have harbored for this day, and for many, decades.

As we stood in a trance at this history point, with a sign on the top of a pier on the river boldly written with the inscription: “EBO LANDING 1803”, there stood an older white man. His name was Thomas, the owner of the property on which this historic site is situated. We had apparently trespassed on his property. We apologized to him and explained our mission. My wife was more expressive as she told him that we are Igbo people who travelled for hours to come and see where our ancestors took their lives and drowned in honour and pride. Mr. Thomas was very welcoming. He knew the entire history of Igbo Landing. He began to narrate the entire story in detail. One of my sons interrupted Mr. Thomas’s tales by pointing out that the word Igbo was misspelled as Ebo, to which Mr. Thomas, retorted sharply that, that was how the slaves pronounced it, and their owners spelled the word.

We were held spell -bound by Mr. Thomas’s education. We listened to him with rapt attention asking questions intermittently as he reeled off details about slavery in the South and the role of all the parties that were involved in the heinous and atrocious trade.

At a point in our interaction with Mr. Thomas, I was anxious to resolve the legendary tales of the appearance of the ghosts of these Igbo slaves on the Island, so I asked him if he had encountered the ghosts of the dead slaves. He confirmed that many have heard the strange singing and wailing voices of these slaves and the clanking and jangling of chains and shackles at odd times. He also confirmed that at many instances, he had experienced many unexplained odd happenings on his property – like finding the lights in his home coming on. These stories gave me goose bumps, as I felt instantly, the presence of these brave Igbo slaves around. The feeling was indeed, real, and eerie too.

Over many years, I have come to the very painful realization that there is a deadly plague or affliction that characterize tribal and ethnic disturbances around the world that have senselessly consumed millions of lives. From the hundreds of millions killed by Belgium’s King Leopold in the Congo, the millions that Germany’s Hitler incinerated, the millions that were starved and killed by bullets and bombs in Biafra, and many other atrocities around the world. Not to mention the millions that died enroute to slavery in the whiteman’s land, and particularly those lgbo slaves that died to uphold their rights to freedom and dignity. At this point, I began to realize the meaning of being Igbo, and of being a part and parcel of the pain and agony that comes with that affinity or affiliation.

As we stood at the site of Igbo Landing, I began to wonder how and where the lgbo people find the tolerance and resilience to bear the long suffering that they have faced in this unkind world. I began to ponder about how they acquire the forbearance to face all the adversities that have become their burden for centuries. I am starting to imagine that the longanimity, which the Igbo have borne for uncountable years, must be an important or a special trait domiciled by God in their DNA. It must be, otherwise how have they been able to withstand and survive the near obliteration of their tribe through slavery, wars, ethnic cleansing, tribal crisis, and many other rebarbative attrition targeted toward them in as many years as our memories can recount.

After about 200 years since the Igbo Landing incident, the ever-deepening account of how our ways of life and our cultures have become so decadent is very concerning. Almost everything about our world has fallen off the cliff, and hitherto remains anchored in hate, prejudices and timidities in such blinding and harmful ways. The wicked impulses of members of God’s creation, and the  repulsiveness therefrom, can be traced all the way down to greed, hatred, petty envy, covetousness, insatiability and the lust for domination of certain races, tribes or ethnic groups by others. There are infact, a million good reasons why we must all find a way out of these wicked malfeasance and immorality that predated slavery, and is still subsisting today, and that which are steeped in false and bewildering piety, infecting the entire world with pure evil and tyranny.

Our groundbreaking trip to St. Simons Island brings to light one of the most shameful chapters in the history of the world – it helps me to unearth a part of the many lost stories of the heinous sins of slavery, while equally exposing me to questions about what have become of the descendants of the Igbo slaves who took their own lives by drowning.What is still baffling to me, is the insidious legacy of tribal animosities that reverberate today against the Igbo. It shames and grieves me as a descendant of people who suffer for absolutely no fault of theirs. We must all recoil and be embarrassed that we all still remain and wallow under the cruelty of slavery and other forms of persecution that have pervaded the world and eaten deep into the fabric of our soul.

In my many writings, I have attempted to invoke the Igbo conundrum as an incubus that has scarred and haunted many since creation. But I do not write exclusively about the Igbo pains and agonies, even as I have made explicit insertions into our everyday lives of the signs and symbols that have put and placed mankind to the lowest levels of discriminations and prosecution.

My writings often as depressing and emotional as they may appear, are fundamentally optimistic, even when they are ferociously and courageously critical of those who perpetrate evil and crimes that unfortunately point us to repeatedly insist that racism and tribalism with the other evils of the world will never end.

I write because I believe that the time has come for us to speak up and counter the hegemonic tribal or even the racial hatred and fill them with the passion of historical remembrance and resistance. I believe that the time has come when all our words are needed, and must be strongly spoken to help us move past these horrors, these pains, and to collectively feel the power of change, and of transformation, redemption and revolution in all that we do.

I feel very deeply that I may have become a temple dedicated to acknowledge our pain now, and stand to claim it as a voice for atonement and freedom. When I listened to one of the descendants and direct beneficiaries of slavery; a rich white man, justify the slave trade and the dehumanizing of the black slaves, I was repulsed, and felt an aversion to retch and vomit on his pale and pugnacious face. When this white man in his regurgitation of his revisionist history of slavery, told me the tales of how the white slave traders preferred Igbo slaves to others because they were strong, hardworking, and survivalists, but also equally detested the rebellious nature and tendencies of the Igbo slaves who were very proud and less subservient to their masters – that they did not tolerate nonsense, I was elated. Those two distinguishing and distinct attributes and virtues of the Igbo slaves, made me very proud to be Igbo.

Standing tall in front of The Igbo Landing site, with my chest proudly kissing the blue skies casting ominous shadows over the waters where my proud ancestors martyred themselves, it became clear to me, that I, and some members of my immediate family present at this site, have become part of an epic history. It was also painfully clear to me that we may not make reparations to the casualties, or to the descendants of these callous and wicked acts; be they the ones committed at St. Simons Islands, or in Biafra. But it is never too late to hold our collective breath and inquire about what happened and why. We have a sacred duty, I believe, to reflect on the meaning of these atrocities and ask what became of our humanity.

Looking back, we can – indeed, must – attempt to process the dehumanization of a people; and we also ought to ask why these atrocities were, and are still being committed, why no contrition has been demonstrated or compunction shown, why no formal amends have been made. These questions will continue to reverberate for generations to come. And they are reasons why I keep writing and hoping that the perpetrators of these crimes will be held accountable, and will repent and become reconnected to a peaceful sempiternal universe.

When we returned from visiting St. Simons Island, I was emotionally exhausted, I was troubled by the sensibility and justification given to the inevitability of slavery –  how the free labour of black slaves was necessary for the survival of the white man and his world. This much was, with a straight face, expressed by Mr. Thomas to us. Blacks were static components and expendable objects in the eyes of the white slave owners. White animosity towards blacks, is almost emblematic to the poor treatment the Igbo receive on a daily basis in their own country. I could not sleep, as l kept pondering these paradoxes and the cycle upon cycle of the benevolent violence visited on people because of their race, tribe, religion or the colour of their skin.

As I struggle to shut my eyes and get some sleep, I fell into a trance – an out-of-body experience that transported me back to the shores of St. Simons Island, and right at the point of the lgbo slaves entry into the river. Behold, and arising out of the river, were ghosts of the slaves in their shinning and glowing toned bodies with pulsating and intermittently thundering drums accompanied with melodious songs. I was frightened, but stood transfixed in a steady gaze, my lips trembling, and my jaws clasping.

They began to address me in familiar but ancient lgbo dialects. The leader spoke to me in a thunderous but soft and reassuring voice. His voice was unmistakably strong and his face had a mixed expression of calmness, breaking his speech with a slight smile that exposed his clean and well-arranged set of pure white teeth. I was very attentive, even as my entire core was trembling not from the freezing winter temperature, but from being in the presence of my ancestors – standing before our legends, and our pride and joy.

He began: “Nwam nwoke, ibia? Chukwu gozie gi”

– My son, you came? God bless you.


“Keda ka uno di? Asi na AnaIgbo ekpugo iru na ani”

– How is home? They say that Igboland has been destroyed.

“Unu na egbu onwe unu ka okuku…

Obu ife anyi ji nwuo … Alu emeee ooo”

– You people are killing each other like chicken … Is this what we died for… abomination …”

As he spoke, tears began to stream from his eyes, and I may have seen fumes of smoke coming out of his huge nostrils. He spoke for a long duration, lamenting the calamities that have befallen the lgbo – mostly self-inflicted. I was so frightened to speak. I hung my head very low and avoided making any sustained eye contact with the Igbo leader by the shores of the powerful Atlantic Ocean. Our ancestors took turns in delivering valuable messages to the world, and to our people at home. They said much more, in some sort of je ne sais quoi; in inexplicable, indefinable and ineffable words – words so difficult to put into writings.

As I attempt to personalize the larger story of The Igbo Landing through my individual experiences, I have entered transformative eye – opening and gut-wrenching conversations that will hopefully recall the horrors and sheer magnitude of the injustices of oppression be it in St. Simons Island or in Awka, Nigeria.

I was immersed in my dream with my trembling becoming more of a quake, accelerating with each word that my ancestors spoke. At that point, I began to wonder why these ghosts chose me as a messenger for their address of the many spectrum of issues that have bedeviled the world, and particularly the trauma of the Igbo existence. Then, suddenly, from the back of the river rose a voice from a younger ghost who appeared to be the scribe of the group. He was a huge but well chiseled man with his entire face covered in a bushy beard. His eyes were bloodshot red, and with his long strong arms, he held up what appeared like a stone tablet from which he read out a long list of their communique to the world and to Ndigbo. I instantly began to take mental  record of the very perfectly articulated message that helped me not only to decolonize my mind, soul and body, but brought me to a deeper level of how I must be motivated to work for the demise of evil in this world. As I listened to the long catalogue of our problems, especially those of the Igbo in the present day Nigeria from this scribe, who I have now named Ojelilgbo Ozi, I found in his message, the decadence that has enveloped our people. I was enraged – but I found in the rage and fierce anger, a healing source of love, strength and hope, and a catalyst for positive change and healing in our home.

All of a sudden my dream that had lasted for many hours began to end. The lgbo ghosts of St. Simons Island had finished with me, and they turned their backs to me, and began to return to the water in slow, but measured gait singing in loud sweet melodies of songs in lgbo that l have never heard before. l then noticed that all their backs were lacerated with sweltings that came from the whippings received from the sharp and strong horsewhips, and the painful floggings they received from their wicked white slave owners. The deep wounds may have healed, but they left scarred evidence of the horror inflicted by our fellow humans on us. Crying, I was jolted out of my bed that has now been drenched in tears and cold sweat in a bloody cold Georgia winter night.

•Okey Anueyiagu, a Professor of Political Economy and is also the Author of Biafra, The Horrors of War, The Story of A Child Soldier

In response to rising global concerns over Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV), the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has instructed hospitals nationwide to enhance their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures.

The directive aims to safeguard public health amid increased HMPV activity reported in countries such as China, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.

Director-general of NCDC, Dr. Jide Idris, in a statement yesterday, emphasised the need for hospitals to implement rigorous IPC practices which include proper hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, respiratory hygiene, and cough etiquette.

Also, all health facilities have been asked to designate appropriate isolation rooms for quick and efficient management of suspected HMPV cases.

Despite the global surge in HMPV cases, the NCDC reported no unusual increase in respiratory infections within Nigeria as of January 6, 2025. However, the DG stated that the agency remains vigilant, conducting dynamic risk assessments in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO), and other international partners.

He said that the risk of HMPV in the country has been classified as moderate, prompting proactive measures to strengthen preparedness and response capacity.

 

The NCDC is also enhancing surveillance through its National Influenza Sentinel Surveillance (NISS) system and has extended testing for HMPV across its facilities, said Dr. Jide.

According to him, Key actions include monitoring influenza-like illnesses and severe acute respiratory infections and supporting laboratories in states with international airports to test for HMPV.

To mitigate the potential spread of HMPV, the DG said that the NCDC was working with Port Health Authorities to bolster readiness at international points of entry.

HMPV, a respiratory virus, poses a higher risk to young children, older adults, and individuals with weakened immune systems. It spreads through respiratory droplets, close personal contact, and contaminated surfaces. Symptoms range from mild cold-like signs to severe respiratory issues such as bronchitis or pneumonia.

The NCDC has issued public advisories urging citizens to practice good hand hygiene, maintain respiratory etiquette, avoid crowded places, and seek medical attention if experiencing symptoms.

The agency reiterated the importance of relying on verified information from official channels to prevent misinformation.

[Leadership]

It is no longer news that the telecoms sector in Nigeria went through a crucial phase last year, with industry players calling for proactive steps to prevent further decline. Telecom operators repeatedly lamented the high cost of operations, excessive taxations and a decline in investments within the sector. Telcos were leaning towards load shedding to reduce operational costs, according to chairman of Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigerian (ALTON), Engr Gbenga Adebayo. Some of these problems and more may also shape events in the sector to this year.

Tariff Review or Low Quality Service

Telecom operators have demanded for urgent review of service tariffs to reflect the economic realities of delivering telecom services for industry sustainability.  Without this, they said, quality service and it’s availability could not be guaranteed this year, and that the economy would suffer for it.

The chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), Engr Gbenga Adebayo who made the call on the behalf of the all operating companies said the sector is currently under and siege tariffs must be reviewed urgently to avoid collapse of sector. So, this year, they said, it is either tariff increase or low quality service.

“If nothing is done, the sector might begin see in the new year grim consequences unfolding, such as Service Shedding”, Adebayo said.

He argued that operators might not be able to provide services in some areas and at some times of the day leaving millions disconnected and there will be significant economic fallout.

He said, “Despite the dire warnings, we still believe that a better 2025 is possible—but only if we act now. Let this be the moment when we come together, acknowledge the urgency of the situation, and commit to saving this sector.”

Likely Legal Tussle Over Hike

But the operators may not have smoothly as the National Association of Telecoms Subscribers (NATCOMS) has rejected the planned tariff hike of telecommunication services in Nigeria, and threatened to challenge it in court.

Though sources in the telecom industry said that the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC)  had given an approval to the Telecommunication Service Operators to hike their tariffs this January, and the approved increment would see the current tariffs rise by about 40%, the NCC has neither denied nor confirmed this supposed increment.

However, NATCOMS considered “the decision of the NCC as very insensitive and not in the interest of Telecoms Services Consumers”.  NATCOMS’ president, Chief Deolu Ogunbanjo and the National Secretary, Barrister Bayo Omotubora said the new increment would be one additional burden too many for Nigerian telecom users, and it would be challenged in court.

Under the new tariffs regime, a voice call will rise from N11.00 to N15.40 per minute, short message services will jump from N4.00 to N5.60 and One GB data bundle will move from N1,000 to N1,400.

Low operating costs, high investment

The ICT and digital economy sector may witness low operating costs and high investment this year as fuel costs go down gradually. The low operating costs will give the operators more revenue to be able to invest more in their networks.

Telecom Infrastructure’s Vandalism May Rise Further

Just before 2024 wound down, telecommunication company, Airtel Nigeria, called for urgent actions to protect telecom infrastructure as vandalism continues to surge leading to a record of an average of 43 fibre cuts daily on the Airtel network alone!

The company’s Director of Corporate Communications and CSR, Femi Adeniran, who made the call, said the telco had suffered a total of 7,742 fibre cuts in the last six months.

According to him, fibre cuts—primarily caused by construction activities, vandalism, and a lack of coordination between stakeholders—have become an epidemic in the Nigerian telecom industry.

But this may worsen this year the federal government and its agencies have not shown any noticable commitment towards yielding the operators’ call for protection of their infrastructure across the country.

Starlink’s Subscription Rates Will Go Up

A satellite internet service, Starlink, has said it will increase its monthly subscription rates for its services in Nigeria from January 27.

The company, in an email to users, said new subscribers will immediately pay the adjusted prices while existing customers will see the changes reflected in their upcoming bills.

“To continue enhancing the Starlink network and provide reliable, high-quality service across Nigeria, we are adjusting our monthly subscription prices,” Starlink said.

“These changes are part of our ongoing commitment to investing in the infrastructure needed to improve your experience with Starlink.”

Under the new pricing structure, the firm said the lowest subscription tier will increase significantly from N38,000 to N75,000 per month.

Starlink said the price of the mobile-regional roam unlimited is now N167,000 while the mobile-global roam service is N717,000.

MTN May Exit From More African countries

MTN Group Limited had sold its business in Guinea (known as “MTN Guinea-Conakry”) to the State of Guinea, effective December 30, 2024.

This deal is consistent with MTN’s focus on portfolio optimisation and simplification as part of the Ambition 2025 plan, the telco said.

MTN Group President and CEO, Ralph Mupita, announced the new development: “This milestone marks a new phase for MTN Guinea-Conakry under local ownership. We thank the staff, customers, regulators, and broader stakeholders in Guinea for their support during our time in the country.

“Concluding this transaction is in line with our strategy to simplify our portfolio and allocate capital to markets where we can make a meaningful impact, ensuring long-term growth and returns.”

The closing of the sale comes after Mupita informed shareholders and markets in April that the telco’s objective was to “streamline and restructure” its portfolio.

At the time, he said that the business had completed the sale of MTN Afghanistan, which marked the end of the group’s exit from its Middle East companies.

Mupita added: “We also accepted an unsolicited offer, subject to conditions precedent, including regulatory approvals for MTN’s equity interests in MTN Guinea-Bissau and MTN Guinea-Conakry.”

The development comes as Africa’s largest mobile provider is reportedly in talks to facilitate MTN’s seamless exit from three other African countries in its West and Central Africa portfolio.

According to the telco’s reports, MTN is facing a number of issues in West and Central Africa, and leaving some of the countries is becoming a viable option, according to some senior officials.

MTN is Africa’s largest mobile network operator with 288m customers in 18 markets across Africa.

Day in Court Over NIN Data Breach

The Paradigm Initiative (PIN) and the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC’s) legal tussle over alleged NIN data breach will begin this month. NIMC is joined in the suit with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS),  and the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS).

Others joined in the suit, whose hearing has been fixed for January 22, 2025, at an Abuja High Court, are the Nigerian Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS), the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Nigerian Data Protection Commission (NDPC) and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation.

NIMC had denied any breach to its database, saying NIN data of Nigerians are intact and not compromised.

But PIN Executive Director, Gbenga Sesan, that though NIMC had been consistently denying that NIN data were hacked, millions of Nigerians have had their personal data which was stored in the commission’s data base hacked by hackers sometime in April this year.

Sesan said, conservatively,  data of 43million Nigerians might have been compromised by cyber criminals due to the negligence of NIMC.

Heavy Fines For Data Breaches in 2025 

The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) has announced plans to significantly ramp up enforcement and impose substantial fines on data controllers and processors that violate the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA).

This was disclosed by the National Commissioner/CEO of the Commission, Dr Vincent Olatunji, in a video outlining the Commission’s 2025 agenda, shared on its social media platforms at the weekend.

Olatunji stated, “For data controllers and processors, there is going to be massive enforcement. We have never really issued any fine, but going forward, you’ll hear us giving heavy penalties.”

[DailyTrust]

Wednesday, 08 January 2025 04:19

Eric Chelle becomes new Super Eagles head coach

The Nigeria Football Federation, NFF, has confirmed Eric Chelle as the new head coach of the national team.

The appointment followed the recommendation of the NFF’s Technical and Development Sub-Committee during its meeting on January 2, 2025, in Abuja.

The recommendation was approved by the NFF Executive Committee on January 7, 2025.

The 47-year-old has previously worked as the head coach of Mali’s senior national team.

He has also managed teams like GS Consolat, FC Martigues, Boulogne, and MC Oran.

During his playing career, he represented Martigues, Valenciennes, Lens, Istres, and Chamois Niortais.

Chelle led Mali to the quarterfinals of the 2023 Africa Cup of Nations, AFCON, in Côte d’Ivoire. They came very close to qualifying for the semi-finals, losing 2-1 to the eventual champions after extra time.

Austine Eguavoen was put in charge of the Super Eagles after Finidi George resigned from the role, following a series of disappointing results in the 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifiers, including a draw against South Africa and a loss to Benin Republic.

Chelle’s appointment takes effect effective immediately and he will be tasked with qualifying Nigeria for the 2026 FIFA World Cup finals.

[DailyPost]

 

“Let me use this New Year’s message to urge our governors and local council chairpersons to work closely with the central government to seize emerging opportunities in agriculture, livestock, and tax reforms and move our nation forward. I commend governors who have embraced our Compressed Natural Gas initiative by launching CNG-propelled public transport. I also congratulate those who have adopted electric vehicles as part of our national energy mix and transition. The Federal Government will always offer necessary assistance to the states,” President Bola Tinubu said in his January 1, 2025, press statement.

Nigeria’s Constitution established and recognised three arms and three tiers of government. The arms are the executive, legislature and judiciary. The tiers are the Federal, State and Local Governments. There are 11, 082 elective political offices in Nigeria. They are as follows: One presidential seat, 36 governorship positions, 109 senatorial seats, 360 House of Representatives positions, 993 State Houses of Assembly seats, 774 local government/area council chairmanship seats and 8,809 councillorship positions. Out of these elective offices, only 470 are at the federal level i.e. president, 109 senators and 360 House of Reps. States have 1,029 namely; 36 governors and 993 State Assembly members while the rest, 9,583 operates at the local government levels.

Most times media and civil society beamed their searchlights on the Federal Government while paying little or no attention to the subnational governments. Meanwhile, sizeable national resources are spent at the subnational. If not for our warped democracy, which has practically centralised governance as if we are under a unitary system and not federal, subnationals are supposed to be more powerful than the centre. Unfortunately, the preponderance of governance areas is under the exclusive legislative list, while just a handful are under the concurrent and residual lists. Despite removing electricity, railway and correctional services from the exclusive to concurrent legislative lists, 65 items are still under the Federal Government’s purview to determine.

Unknown to many Nigerians, items such as education, roads, health, housing, water, agriculture, electricity, prisons, and railways are under the concurrent legislative list where both federal and state governments have jurisdiction to provide these amenities and services. When roads are deplorable, the blame is heaped on the President not minding that these bad roads could be Trunk B road, which is under the state government, or Trunk C road, which is under the local government authority. Same with health services. Many compatriots do not know that primary health centres are under the control of local government while general hospitals are under the state government. It is only tertiary hospitals and federal medical centres that are under the Federal Government.  Same with schools. There are federal universities, polytechnics and colleges of education just as there are state-owned ones. Secondary schools are mostly established by state governments, while primary schools are supposed to be established, funded and controlled by the local government areas.

It is noteworthy that President Tinubu’s administration, just like his predecessors, has been doing a lot to assist the subnational levels. With the removal of subsidies, the federal allocations coming to the subnational levels have significantly increased. In August 2024, the President said that the Federal Government had released N570bn to the 36 states of the federation to expand livelihood support to Nigerians.

Speaking on Sunday, August 4, 2024, during a national broadcast to Nigerians as a result of the hunger protest embarked upon by the citizens, the President added that while 600,000 nano businesses had benefitted from the Federal Government’s nano grants, an additional 400,000 more nano businesses were expected to benefit. Last year, the Federal Government distributed 42,000 metric tonnes of grains through the states to poor Nigerians at no cost to them.

Several other Federal Government initiatives, such as the conditional cash transfer to millions of vulnerable Nigerians; the home-grown school feeding programme; single interest loan scheme to millions of nano, small and medium as fertiliser support to farmers and the provision of CNG buses to commuters, are being done by the Federal Government through the states.

 

It is therefore important to know what the states are doing with their resources. There is no gainsaying that if the three tiers of government work collaboratively on agricultural production and infrastructural development and join hands to fight insecurity, Nigeria will be a better place to live in.

That is why what some state governments are doing in terms of these governance issues is heartwarming. Just last Saturday, January 4, 2025, President Tinubu was in Enugu State to inaugurate projects completed by Governor Peter Mbah. The projects inaugurated by the President were the 30 completed and equipped Enugu Smart Green Schools out of 260 under construction across the 260 wards in the state; 60 completed and equipped Type 2 primary healthcare centres out of the 260 under construction across the 260 wards in the state; a multi-auditorium and multi-functional Enugu International Conference Centre; 90 completed urban roads in Enugu City; and a state-of-the-art command and control center/150 patrol vehicles fitted with AI-embedded surveillance cameras. It is noteworthy that the President is not in the same party as the governor. While the President is a member of the All Progressives Congress, the governor is a member of the Peoples Democratic Party. Good governance, not reckless partisanship, is needed.

Mention must also be made of the yeoman efforts of Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, under whose watch the metro rail of the state has come to fruition. The blue and red rail lines have been inaugurated and are now in full operation. This transportation option has given Lagosians a multi-choice of commuting options. You may choose to commute via water, rail or road in Lagos. This ultimately will help to reduce traffic jams that have been synonymous with Lagos.

I am excited about what Governor Alex Otti is doing in Abia State. Most heartwarming to me is that 82 per cent of his N750.28bn Abia State 2025 budget, which he signed on Friday, December 27, 2024, is capital expenditure, while a mere 18 per cent is recurrent. He was quoted as saying, “Our push for infrastructural development is reflected in this budget because when you allocate over 80 per cent to capital expenditure, it speaks to what you want to achieve with infrastructure—things that will outlast all of us.”

In October last year, the Borno State Governor, Babagana Zulum, unveiled six projects during his tour of two local government areas of the southern part of the state. The projects unveiled included a 60-classroom Islamic college through which the state government aimed to combat violent extremism and avert young people from being radicalised by terrorist sects. His handling of the unfortunate flooding of Maiduguri last year and the resettlement of internally displaced persons back to their ancestral lands are all commendable. I know many other states are doing well but they need to do more.

Unfortunately, the development in Edo State in the way and manner Governor Monday Okpebholo and the Edo State House of Assembly are treating the 18 local government councils in the state is reprehensible and heartrending. First, the governor wrote to demand an audit report from the LGAs. When he was ignored because he was acting ultra vires, he allegedly petitioned the Edo State House of Assembly, which promptly passed a motion suspending the LGA chairmen and the vice chairmen for two months. This has been roundly condemned by well-meaning Nigerians, including the Attorney General and Minister of Justice. As if that was not enough, councillors in these LGAs are now being induced to impeach the suspended chairmen. This is unhealthy for our democracy. The governor and the state House of Assembly lack the power to suspend chairmen of councils. While the councillors are vested with the constitutional right to impeach chairmen and vice chairmen, due process ought to be followed. In the extant case of Edo State, the rule of law is being flagrantly flouted in handling the local government crises.

X: @jideojong

Northern groups, including the Coalition of Northern Groups and the Northern Elders Forum, have again insisted on the withdrawal of the tax reform bills as senators intensified lobbying for public acceptance of the proposed tax changes.

The groups demanded further consultations and extensive dialogue with stakeholders on the bills.

Speaking during a one-day town hall meeting at the Gombe State University on the theme, ‘Tax reform bill: A catalyst for economic growth or a burden on the people?,’ CNG Gombe Coordinator, Mustapha Deba, noted that the coalition had meticulously analysed the bills, noting that if allowed to scale through, they would have far-reaching adverse effects on the northern region.

Deba said, “The proposed reform’s emphasis on derivation appears to favour states with higher VAT-generating activities predominantly in the South, such as Lagos. This shift could significantly reduce the revenue shares allocated to Northern states, where economic activities are comparatively lower.

 

“The resultant financial shortfall would impede our region’s development initiatives and exacerbate existing disparities. By altering the VAT sharing formula without adequate safeguards, the reform risks widening the economic gap between the North and South.

 “Such an outcome could foster social unrest, trigger migration to economically stronger states, and precipitate other socio-economic challenges. We must avoid any policy that could deepen regional inequalities.”

A major point of contention, he said, is the absence of comprehensive data and analysis to support the proposed changes.

“As we reflect on the implications of the tax reform bills, it is imperative that we advocate for a tax system that fosters national unity and economic prosperity. We cannot afford to endorse reforms that deepen existing divides or marginalize any segment of our society.”

In his presentation, Prof Sadiq Abubakar observed that the tax reform bills had ignited considerable debate, often revealing the polarising sentiments experienced by various stakeholders across the nation, especially regarding their implications for Northern Nigeria.

He stated, “The proposed reforms are expected to streamline tax administration processes and frameworks, increase overall government revenue, and stimulate sustainable economic growth, to mention a few.  Nevertheless, these reforms would come with socio-economic repercussions, particularly for Northern Nigeria, which struggles with distinctive challenges ranging from insecurity, poverty, unemployment, and food insecurity.

 “Proposed changes to Value Added Tax rates, distribution of VAT revenues, development levies, and taxation on various sectors including agriculture and religious organisations, could exacerbate existing economic hardships and cultural tensions.

“Some sections of the bills clash with religious values, risking the marginalisation of some faithful. To avoid exacerbating socio-economic disparities and to establish a fair and more inclusive taxation framework, policymakers must consider the unique cultural and economic landscapes of all regions, especially Northern Nigeria.

“Engaging in comprehensive dialogue with varied stakeholders will foster legislative outcomes that respect the rights and welfare of all citizens, ensuring a balanced approach to taxation that promotes national unity and economic stability.”

On his part, the chairman on the occasion, Umar Gurama, urged the participants to collaborate with lawmakers in sensitising communities and gathering their inputs before such reforms become law.

Weighing in again on the controversy, the NEF criticised the Federal Government’s alleged failure to engage with critical stakeholders and experts before drafting the bills.

The forum made known its position in a statement signed by its Chairman, Management Board, Al-Amin Daggash.

Daggash said, “Once again, it is necessary to reiterate, that indeed, Nigerians in general and Northerners in particular, are not really against the introduction of any form of good and meaningful reforms by those in positions of authority, at the federal, state or local government levels.

 “Even though we shall remain very implacable in reaffirming that our practical experiences teach us that going by global best practices, successful reforms are known to be underpinned by strict adherence to certain common cardinal characteristics of the public policy-making process.

 “For the convenience of exposition, these similarities include, but not limited to the under-listed essentials: Extensive pre-reforms early engagements with experts and critical stakeholders, in order to secure their buy-in; establishing a very well-defined media/communication strategy that clearly articulates the full import of the reforms and disseminates public awareness and mass enlightenment on a nationwide scale; designing a robust, transparent and inclusive implementation mechanism.

“The Northern Elders’ Forum makes bold to say that the recently proposed Tax Reform Bills by the Federal Government were clearly in breach, with regards to adhering to the above-listed common characteristics of reforms and public policy-making process, all over the world and in conformity with the global best practices.”

In a move to woo their northern counterparts, the Senator representing Delta North senatorial district in the National Assembly, Senator Ned Nwoko, says the Southern lawmakers are currently engaging their Northern colleagues.

“We are engaging them. The tax bills are generally a welcome development because they seek to support low-income earners and small businesses across the nation.

“They are equally pro-consumers across the board. We need more awareness amongst the populace. This is the first time that tax administration is being consolidated for easier administration with a special ombudsman to effectively determine disputed assessments.”

 

However, Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi State again reiterated his opposition to the tax bills, stating that the Presidency did not obtain the buy-in of stakeholders before sending them to the National Assembly.

Restating the Bauchi governor’s stance, his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Mukhtar Gidado, underscored the danger of forcing the tax reform bills on Nigerians.

He said, “The (Bala’s) advice aims to foster dialogue and advocate for policies that protect the interests of ordinary Nigerians, particularly those in economically disadvantaged states.

“When Governor Bala Mohammed asserted that the Presidency’s attempt to shove the discredited tax reforms down the throat of Nigerians was a recipe for anarchy, he spoke from the position of someone who is closer to the populace and who carries the mandate of not only the over seven million people of Bauchi State but who also possesses an intimate knowledge of a very significant sub-regional group in the country.

“It is not by accident that his genuine reservation against the tax reforms coincides with those of some APC governors who have consistently warned against implementing the proposed reform in its present form.”

He added, “If the Presidency had genuinely desired an all-inclusive tax reform that would command the buy-in of various stakeholder and sub-national groups in the country, it could have subjected a draft to discussion before railroading it to the National Assembly.

“It did not. Even when it was given a soft landing by the National Economic Council, NEC, a body headed by the Vice President of the country and which, by that token, was expected to command the respect of the President, its advice that the reform be taken back was blatantly disregarded.”

Meanwhile, in a separate interview with The PUNCH, a North-East lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorised to speak on the matter, urged the President to withdraw the bills.

He said, “The President should heed the wise counsel of good Nigerians and withdraw the bills for wider stakeholder consultation. Failure to heed the calls would only prolong the stalemate on the bills. When listing the bills for debate at the parliament becomes a challenge, passing them will remain a dream.”

Taking a different position on the issue, the member representing Lavum/Mokwa/Edati Federal Constituency, Niger State, Joshua Gana, called for support for the bills, adding that the areas of controversy would be addressed at a public hearing.

 “As a National Assembly, we will debate all issues raised at public hearings, and answers will be proffered and considered. The finalised document for Fiscal and tax reform will be harmonised and passed,” he stated.

A Peoples Democratic Party lawmaker, Aliyu Mustapha, urged the President to educate the public to energise support for the bills.

 

Mustapha, who represents Ikara/Kubau Federal Constituency, Kaduna State, said, “Consultations and more engagement with the stakeholders are very important. I believe in the power of lobby and sensitisation.

“Critical stakeholders should be lobbied for a win-win deal, and the general populace should be sensitised. There is really an urgent need to reform our tax system to bring about the desired development we all yearn for.”

Also, the Senator representing Edo South in the Red Chamber, Neda Imasuen, pointed out that the current VAT sharing was inequitable and in favour of the North.

Imasuen wondered why Kano and Jigawa would benefit from VAT generated from the consumption of alcohol in the south.

 “As a member of the Appropriation Committee of the Senate, I have colleagues from the northern region around me. Some of my colleagues believe that the reform is necessary, the reason being that they want to change the status quo from governors coming to Abuja for handouts and that the tax reform will make the governors think out of the box. They will also be able to raise funds in new ways in their respective states.

“Most of them believe that this reform is not favourable to the North and I ask them, ‘in what way?’ They said that it is not equitable. And I try to engage them to know their views about the inequitable nature of the reform. Right now, VAT is shared based on 20 per cent consumption, 20 per cent for the place where the revenue is generated and 60 per cent based on population.

“I always tell my Northern colleagues that this is where the inequity lies. Tax is collected in a state that consumes a particular product, let’s say alcoholic beverages for example, and that state has only three million population. It only gets a fraction of the VAT, but a state like Kano gets a chunk of the tax because it has a large population. That is the inequity we are trying to point out to them.”

Meanwhile, Governor Hope Uzodimma of Imo state called on Nigerians not to subject the tax reform bills to politics and blackmail.

Speaking at the Government House in Owerri, Imo State, Uzodimma stated, “Many of us who are criticising the bills have not taken time to study the bills to understand the merits or otherwise of the bills that have been presented.

“I’m of the view that people should not subject the bills to politics or blackmail. They should just look at the bills, go through them, and then see how far they can criticise or support the bills.

“I think it’s a document that has been crafted in a well-articulated manner and deserves to be given proper attention, particularly given that this is an executive bill from the president and shouldn’t be trivialised.”

[Punch]