President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has appointed Aisha Garba, an international development specialist, as the Executive Secretary of Universal Basic Education (UBEC).

Garba, a Senior Education Specialist with the World Bank, brings more than twenty-four years of experience driving impactful programmes in education for human and economic development, working in Nigeria, Ghana, Somalia, Kenya, the USA, and the United Kingdom.

With over 15 years of hands-on experience at the World Bank, Garba has consistently led end-to-end design and management of education programmes and reforms, from conceptualisation to completion and impact assessment.

Apart from being actively interested in and involved in human development issues, the development specialist will share her rich network with governments, development partners, and communities, as well as the skills she acquired working in fragile, conflict, and violent settings to deliver sustainable solutions in basic education.

Garba had previously worked on the team that met the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) targets in Nigeria and consulted for the World Bank, Department for International Development, BOND-UK, Regent Foundation, and Muslim Aid Organization.

She is an alumna of Petra American University in Jordan, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts combined degree in English and Computer Studies in 2000. She later got a Master's in International Development at the University of Birmingham in the UK in 2007.

The President expects the new Executive Secretary of UBEC to drive the renewed hope and vision of providing and supporting quality education and ensuring that Nigerian children become globally competitive.

Bayo Onanuga
Special Adviser to the President
(Information & Strategy)

Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, President of the African Development Bank (AfDB), has been awarded the inaugural "African of the Decade" title, recognizing his exceptional contributions to Africa's development over the past ten years. The award was presented during the 2024 Africa Investment Forum in Rabat, Morocco, hosted by the All-Africa Business Leaders Awards in partnership with ABN Group and CNBC Africa.

The award celebrates individuals who have driven profound, lasting changes on the continent. Dr. Adesina, who concludes his decade-long tenure as AfDB President in 2025, has been a transformative leader, lauded for his visionary achievements in improving the socio-economic fabric of Africa through strategic initiatives like the Bank’s "High5" priorities: Light Up and Power Africa, Feed Africa, Industrialize Africa, Integrate Africa, and Improve the Quality of Life for the People of Africa.

During the ceremony, ABN Group Chairman Rakesh Wahi described Adesina as an emblem of ethical leadership, emphasizing his ability to deliver results that address Africa's most pressing challenges. CNBC Africa Chief Editor Godfrey Mutizwa echoed these sentiments, highlighting Adesina’s innovative partnerships and development strategies.

Revolutionizing Agriculture and Infrastructure

Before his AfDB leadership, Adesina served as Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture, where he spearheaded groundbreaking reforms. Among his notable achievements was the introduction of the e-wallet system, a digital innovation that eliminated corruption in the fertilizer sector and directly delivered subsidized inputs to millions of Nigerian farmers via mobile phones. This system dramatically increased agricultural productivity and enhanced livelihoods for smallholder farmers.

At AfDB, Adesina championed partnerships with global institutions, including a landmark collaboration with the World Bank to bring electricity access to 300 million Africans. Under his leadership, AfDB has mobilized billions of dollars in investment, positioned Africa as a global economic hub, and tackled challenges ranging from infrastructure gaps to climate resilience.

Driving a Vision for Sustainable Growth

The awards committee noted that Adesina’s leadership embodies a commitment to addressing socio-economic and environmental challenges. Among his key contributions:

• Attracting global investment to Africa’s renewable energy and infrastructure sectors.
• Launching initiatives that align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
• Empowering women and youth through targeted programs such as the Affirmative Finance Action for Women in Africa (AFAWA) initiative.
• Responding to crises, including AfDB’s pivotal role in mitigating the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across African nations.

A Heartfelt Dedication

Accompanied by his wife, Mrs. Grace Yemisi Adesina, Dr. Adesina expressed his deep gratitude upon receiving the honor. "This award is a testament to what is possible when we believe in the transformative power of Africa’s potential," he said, dedicating it to the people of Africa.

"God did not make a mistake when He made me an African. I will do all I can, to my final breath, for Africa," Adesina vowed, underscoring his unwavering dedication to the continent’s progress.

Inspiring a Legacy of Leadership

As Dr. Adesina prepares to conclude his presidency, his legacy serves as a benchmark for ethical and impactful leadership. His work has not only uplifted millions of lives but also redefined Africa's global narrative as a continent of innovation, resilience, and opportunity.

The "African of the Decade" award sets a high standard for future leaders, celebrating the achievements of individuals who drive meaningful, transformative change on the continent. Dr. Adesina’s accomplishments, from agricultural innovation to infrastructure investment, stand as a testament to the power of visionary leadership in unlocking Africa’s vast potential.

[https://www.devdiscourse.com]

Lately, there has been much hoopla in the media about the new Tory Party leader in the United Kingdom, Mrs. Kemi Badenoch. From the media accounts I have read, this remarkable lady has pulled herself up by her bootstraps, rising from ground zero through diligent academic pursuits, building a successful professional career, and ultimately venturing into politics, where she has risen to astronomical heights in British politics.

In my assessment, her accomplishments are phenomenal, and she embodies the classic example of hard work yielding great rewards.

Unfortunately, commentaries about her coming from her ancestral country, Nigeria, have been largely negative. Her “offense” appears to be that she has, on one or two occasions, painted Nigeria in an unfavorable light. Among those who have lambasted her for not presenting Nigeria positively are my good friends, former Aviation Minister Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, and Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, Chairperson of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission. Most recently, Nigeria’s Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, has joined the fray by publicly criticizing Mrs. Badenoch as a potential prime minister of the UK.

Stunningly, Vice President Shettima even suggested that Badenoch should drop her first name, Kemi, if she no longer wanted to be associated with Nigeria. His remarks received a sharp response from the Tory leader, who asserted that she is not obliged to launder Nigeria’s image.

The question is: What value does this heated exchange in the media between Nigeria’s Vice President and a potential UK Prime Minister bring to either country?
In my view, the incendiary comments will yield nothing positive for both sides.
To put things into context, it is worth recalling that Mrs. Badenoch is not the first UK leader to portray Nigeria negatively. Former British Prime Minister David Cameron infamously referred to then-President Muhammadu Buhari as the leader of a “fantastically corrupt country” in front of the late Queen Elizabeth II Notably, President Buhari did not flinch, let alone express outrage.

But unsurprisingly, Cameron’s remark sparked debate on social media, with opinions divided. Some Nigerian youths even blamed Buhari for the odious statement, arguing that his rhetoric—such as always accusing Nigerians of corruption and branding her youths as lazy—had contributed to the negative perception of Nigeria and Nigerians globally.

Going back further, when the All Progressives Congress (APC) was in opposition, its then-spokesman, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, and other high-ranking party leaders often described Nigeria in derogatory terms to discredit the then-ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in their pursuit of political advantage. At that time, it seemed not to occur to them that such rhetoric would empower foreigners to disparage the country. In fact, it was such odious comments that became the ammunition that Cameron exploited during Buhari’s visit to Buckingham Palace.

Given this history, it is puzzling why Chief Fani-Kayode, Hon. Dabiri-Erewa, and, especially, Vice President Shettima, are now trying to hinder Badenoch’s progress in the UK based on her negative portrayal of Nigeria. These seasoned politicians surely understand that at her current stage in her political career, Badenoch—like many politicians before her—must make calculated remarks to align with her constituency and political objectives. Nigerian politicians can not deny playing to the gallery of public opinion while climbing the political ladder.

Arising from the above, what justification exists for the uproar about Badenoch’s remarks? What has she said that is not already in the public domain? Furthermore, the issues she referenced are arguably no longer as prominent in Nigeria today as back in the days when she was in Nigeria.

So, instead of seeing Badenoch as an adversary, Nigerians should celebrate her achievements and allow her to chart her course. In fact, we should make efforts to prove to her and indeed the world that things are no longer what Mrs Badenoch thinks of Nigeria.

That is why I have titled this piece: “Let Kemi Badenoch Be All She Can Be.”

It is worth recalling that in my column of November 26, titled: “Kemi Badenoch’s Remarkable Ascent in UK Politics: A Milestone for the Black Community,” I explored multiple factors that could have influenced Badenoch’s apparent disdain for Nigeria. Her views, as she has shared during her political engagements, seem rooted in her traumatizing personal experiences growing up in Nigeria.

From her accounts, it is evident that those incidents deeply affected her, prompting her to leave Nigeria for the UK at the age of 16. Who knows? She may still be grappling with the trauma of those early experiences of insecurity and other challenges she endured.

Are we not aware, through historical accounts, that back in the day, when the Queen of England uttered the phrase “off with their head,” the victim was executed, often without due process, as the concept of the rule of law was absent at the time? Would UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, or even King Charles III, be offended if a Nigerian, an American, or someone of another nationality expressed disapproval of such historical practices? Certainly not, as those narratives belong to the past and have long been consigned to the dustbin of history.

Similarly, Mrs. Badenoch’s unpleasant experiences in Nigeria before she left at the age of 16—now nearly three decades ago, as she is 44—are also in the past. The realities she described no longer define Nigeria, and we, as a nation, owe it to ourselves and the world to redefine our country and move forward.

Of course, as Badenoch rightly stated, she can not engage in image laundering for Nigeria, and to be frank, we truly need to take responsibility for that ourselves. Ironically, it is the persistent hammering of her negative remarks that continues to keep the issue alive in the public domain, prompting this intervention.
I can bet that there are millions of Nigerians in the diaspora of Nigerian ancestry who share Badenoch’s sentiments of resentment towards Nigeria and the system. It behooves of Nigeria, especially Abike Dabiri-Erewa-Dabiri led diaspora commission to change such a negative mindset.

To refresh our memories, I am republishing not just an excerpt from the earlier referenced article but the entire piece to allow readers to revisit my position and gain a holistic view of the matter. I ask for the understanding of readers as I do so.

Below is the full article:

As Great Britain, once a colonial power ruling over 56 nations now part of the Commonwealth, transitions into a more inclusive society, a symbolic form of ‘reverse colonization’ seems to be unfolding. This phenomenon, exemplified by individuals from formerly colonized nations rising to leadership roles in the UK, highlights the open-mindedness of Britons. Their inclusive approach has afforded immigrants, including those born in the UK, equal opportunities alongside the native population.

The adventurous spirit of the British has also contributed to London’s evolution into a cosmopolitan hub. Home to people from various former colonies, London has become a melting pot of cultures and a global financial center rivaling cities like New York, Shanghai, and Hong Kong.

Historically, Britain’s dominance as a seafaring nation—beginning after the country’s founding in 1707—enabled it to build an empire that spanned nearly a quarter of the globe. Through its control of vast territories in Africa, India, Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Caribbean, the British Empire left an indelible mark on the world. While the UK is no longer the imperial force it once was, it remains a vital player on the global stage.

Should Kemi Badenoch—of Nigerian heritage and now the leader of the Tory Party currently in opposition—one day become the UK’s Prime Minister, it would be a monumental achievement, not just for Nigerians but for Africans and the global Black community. Her rise would echo that of Barack Obama, whose election as the first Black President of the United States inspired millions worldwide.

However, it is unlikely that Nigerians had a direct hand in Badenoch’s political success. Her ascent in the UK’s political sphere did not hinge on support from Nigerian-majority constituencies. Therefore, Nigerians must allow her to continue climbing the political ladder without the negativity that sometimes characterizes reactions to such achievements, as evidenced by the vilification she is currently contending with.”

In my view, if Kemi Badenoch reaches the pinnacle of UK politics, she may eventually acknowledge her Nigerian roots. However, even if she doesn’t, her success remains significant. It would serve as an inspiration for Nigerian-born Britons and the broader Black community in the UK, as well as in other parts of Europe and North America, to pursue political leadership—marking a meaningful step forward for the Black race.

In the United States, Barack Obama deliberately distanced himself from Black identity politics during his presidential campaign, recognizing that such an approach could limit his appeal in a nation where Black Americans constitute just 13% of the population. By contrast, Hispanics account for approximately 14%, while Caucasians make up around 67%. The significant role of rural Caucasian voters in Donald Trump’s victories in 2016 and 2024—and their influence in Keir Starmer’s Labour Party overtaking the Conservatives earlier this year—underscores the importance of appealing to broader, more diverse constituencies in multi-ethnic democracies.

For candidates from minority backgrounds aspiring to lead multi-ethnic nations, emphasizing racial or ethnic identity can create barriers. Hence, Badenoch, like others before her, must navigate this challenge.

Historically, Rev. Al Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson campaigned for the U.S. presidency with platforms centered on Black identity, but neither achieved electoral success. Barack Obama learned from these missteps, avoiding identity politics and instead galvanizing young voters through social media, ultimately winning the presidency in 2008. Similarly, Kamala Harris, the current U.S. Vice President distanced herself from minority-focused identity politics. This is why she did not prominently emphasize her Black heritage during her campaign but instead celebrated her marriage to Doug Emhoff, a Caucasian, to broaden her appeal further.

Kemi Badenoch appears to be following a similar path in the UK. Her husband, Mr. Hamish Badenoch is a successful Caucasian banker—a detail that could work in her favor when elections are called. As leader of the Conservative Party, this positioning may enhance her chances of becoming the UK’s next Prime Minister.

Meanwhile, the debate over reparations for the historical atrocities of slavery perpetrated against Africans continues to stir emotions. At the recent Commonwealth meeting in Apia, Samoa, African representatives renewed their calls for reparations. However, King Charles dismissed the demands, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer brushed them aside. This response frustrated African advocates and reignited debates about the relevance of the Commonwealth, especially if it primarily serves to promote the economic interests of the UK as a former colonial power, with Africa as a market for its goods and services.

The UK’s resistance to reparations—unlike Germany, which compensated Israel for the Holocaust—is likely rooted in the immense financial burden such a commitment would impose, especially given the UK’s current economic difficulties.

Nevertheless, Britons, like Americans, have demonstrated commendable inclusivity and liberalism by granting citizens of foreign ancestry equal opportunities to rise to the highest echelons of political power. This inclusive approach could, for now, be seen as a symbolic form of reparation for the UK’s inability to meet Africa’s demands for financial reparations.

In this context, Kemi Badenoch’s rise to prominence—an African woman occupying one of the most significant positions in British politics—offers a powerful symbolic acknowledgment of historical injustices. It reflects the readiness of a former colonizer to atone, in part, for past atrocities such as slavery and the exploitation of Africa’s economic resources. Her potential candidacy for the Prime Minister would reaffirm this gesture of non-financial reparation, serving as a tribute to Africa’s historical exploitation, particularly that of West Africa.

That said, I do not support those in Nigeria who have criticized Badenoch for her disparaging remarks about the country during her bid for Conservative Party leadership. As Otto von Bismarck once said, “Politics is the art of the possible.” This pragmatic view mirrors the boldness that led Bismarck to organize the infamous Berlin Conference of 1884/85, where Africa was partitioned among European powers. The vestiges of this partitioning persist today and are part of the reason the continent remains underdeveloped.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, is famously associated with the statement: “In politics, nothing happens by accident.” This highlights that political events and decisions are rarely spontaneous but are typically the result of meticulous planning, strategy, and deliberate manipulation.

Kemi Badenoch’s ambition to become the next Prime Minister of the UK is legitimate, and her approach reflects this aspiration. By aligning herself with the expectations of the British electorate, she has positioned herself as a candidate who embodies British political ideals. However, her portrayal of Nigeria, which has drawn criticism from Nigerians, likely serves to reassure skeptical voters in the UK of her commitment to those ideals—ideals that differ markedly from the political climate in her ancestral home.

Critics who find her comments about Nigeria disparaging may view them as unnecessary, but Napoleon Bonaparte’s assertion that “In politics, absurdity is not a handicap” offers a counterpoint. This underscores the reality that political maneuvering often includes statements or actions perceived as controversial or unconventional.

The ruthless ambition often associated with political pursuits is exemplified by Nicolae Ceaușescu, the former communist leader of Romania, who reportedly declared: “I will sell my mother to buy power. After getting power, I will buy my mother back.” While the literal feasibility of such a claim is questionable, it reflects the unrelenting drive and willingness to sacrifice personal relationships for political gain. Similarly, Ghanaian politician Freddie Blay echoed this sentiment, stating: “I love politics, and I would spend money to win power. If you are not careful, I will even be ready to sell my mother for money to retain my position.”

This stark perspective highlights an inconvenient truth: such a mindset underpins the actions of many politicians globally, particularly in authoritarian systems. Politics, after all, is a game of power and influence, often involving the orchestration of events to achieve specific objectives. While this doesn’t always imply malicious intent, it does illustrate the calculated nature of political strategy. As Groucho Marx wittily observed: “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.”

From a historical standpoint, Badenoch’s current political strategy in the UK parallels that of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), whose rise to the U.S. presidency (1933–1945) was shaped by significant challenges, including the Great Depression and World War II. FDR’s leadership was marked by calculated and strategic decisions, much like Badenoch’s tactical rise to the top of the Tory party as she positioned herself for a shot at the premiership.

As the saying goes: “There is no smoke without fire.”

Badenoch’s seemingly critical stance on Nigeria may be driven by the significant obstacles she faces in her political journey. These include her non-Caucasian identity, which may lead some to question whether her African heritage aligns with British identity. This skepticism is compounded by concerns that her Nigerian background might influence her leadership style if she were to become Prime Minister. Overcoming these challenges requires Badenoch to carefully navigate perceptions and prove her commitment to the ideals and values expected by the British electorate.

Given the unconscious bias her non-Caucasian background might invite, Kemi Badenoch appears to have strategically distanced herself from Nigeria. This move is likely aimed at improving her chances of securing the top political position in the UK—Prime Minister and resident of 10 Downing Street. To achieve this, she has deliberately redefined herself as a quintessential Briton, fully embodying British political ideals and values.

Therefore, Badenoch’s public criticism of Nigeria’s political standards plays into this strategy, enhancing her appeal to the UK electorate who need to be assured that her values as a politician are higher than the typical Nigerian standard. These voters, to whom she must demonstrate her allegiance, are the ones whose support she needs to succeed in her political ambitions—not the Nigerians who have no voting rights in the UK and are criticizing her for not pandering to them.

Given the above reality, it is essential to view Badenoch’s actions through the lens of political survival. She faces significant challenges as she navigates her role as the first Black woman to lead a major political party in the UK. Her situation can even be likened to popular cultural phenomena. For instance, her political journey resembles contestants on the Big Brother reality television show, where individuals use charm, wit, and strategy to outlast competitors and win over audiences to clinch the coveted prize. Similarly, it mirrors the power struggles and scheming seen in Game of Thrones, where characters fight for survival and dominance in a high-stakes, ruthless environment.

Understanding the immense pressures Badenoch faces should prompt Nigerians to support her rather than criticize her. Hence, this intervention aims to provide another point of view (PoV) on the matter. Unfortunately, many Nigerians, despite sharing a common ancestry with her, have been quick to attack her leadership style and political stance. Hopefully, this article will help explain the rationale behind her political posture, which has drawn ire from Nigerians who perceive it as disloyal or unflattering. By recognizing the challenges Badenoch confronts, critics may better understand her choices and judge her more fairly.

Here is your revised text with grammar and spelling corrections, along with adjustments for clarity and readability:

In stark contrast to the criticism Kemi Badenoch has received for not openly embracing her Nigerian heritage, Rishi Sunak, the former UK Prime Minister of Indian descent, enjoyed overwhelming support from both the Indian diaspora in the UK and Indians back home.

1. Distinct Diaspora Dynamics
The Indian diaspora in the UK is larger, more established, and maintains stronger cultural and economic ties to India. In comparison, while the Nigerian community in the UK is growing, it lacks the same level of organization and connection to Nigeria.
2. Nigerian Political Challenges and Skepticism
Nigeria’s history of political instability and corruption has fostered skepticism among its citizens. Consequently, many Nigerians may hesitate to celebrate a politician, especially one who has achieved success within a foreign political system.
3. Limited Connection or Representation
Unlike Rishi Sunak, who openly embraces and celebrates his Indian heritage, Kemi Badenoch has not prominently highlighted her Nigerian roots and has even downplayed them. Her apparent reluctance, possibly influenced by Nigeria’s challenges, may contribute to the lack of enthusiasm among Nigerians.
4. Divergent Expectations from Diaspora Figures
Nigerians tend to focus on the tangible contributions their diaspora representatives make toward Nigeria’s development rather than celebrating individual achievements abroad. This difference in priorities may explain the muted reception to Badenoch’s political ambitions.
5. Media Portrayal and Controversy
The role of social and traditional media can not be ignored. Badenoch’s controversial remarks about Nigeria have sparked significant backlash, with media platforms amplifying these sentiments and shaping public opinion.

In Conclusion

Rishi Sunak and Kemi Badenoch (if she becomes Prime Minister) will not be the first politicians from minority backgrounds to lead the UK. Several British Prime Ministers have had diverse ancestries:
• William Pitt the Younger: Born in England, he became Prime Minister at the age of 24 and had Irish ancestry through his father, a British politician.
• Benjamin Disraeli: An English-born Prime Minister whose father was an Italian immigrant.
• Harold Wilson: Born in England, Wilson’s father, a chemist, had Scottish roots.

Kemi Badenoch, an African of Nigerian heritage, could similarly rise to lead the UK, following the precedent set by these figures.

Some critics might attempt to frame her success as “reverse colonialism.” However, she will not be the first minority from a former colony to rule the UK. Like Nigeria, India was colonized by Britain, and Rishi Sunak served as UK Prime Minister for two years (2022–2024) without significantly favoring Indians or enriching India. This demonstrates that such fears are baseless.

As Badenoch appears to have a strong chance of becoming the next UK Prime Minister, Nigerians should refrain from actions or criticisms that could undermine her ambitions.

To Kemi Badenoch, my advice is simple: remain composed (translated in Yoruba as fara-bale). Although you are British, your umbilical cord is still tied to Nigeria, and you will need the blessings of Nigerians as you ascend to the highest office in your current country of citizenship.

I join others in wishing her, as well as other politicians of Nigerian heritage, climbing the political ladders in their respective countries, the best of luck as they pursue their dreams of becoming Prime Ministers or Presidents.

The piece reproduced here was written and published several weeks ago, on November 26, to be precise, and it remains relevant today as Vice President Kashim Shettima's comment has re-ignited the cataclysm.

Some things are better left in line with the conventional dictum: “Let sleeping dogs lie.” because Nigeria has everything to lose if we keep dredging up and keeping alive old negative news in the public space.

Kemi Badenoch is the least of Nigeria’s problems right now. Our leaders should try to excite Nigerians with the seemingly good news that the ice is thawing concerning the cost-of-living crisis. This may be evidenced by the gradual drop in petrol pump prices, positive signs in the naira-to-dollar exchange rate, improvements in our foreign exchange reserves in the CBN, increased crude oil production, reduced crude oil theft by international syndicates hitherto siphoning oil by rupturing pipelines just as there have been significant security improvements, which National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu and General Chris Musa, Chief of Defense Staff, have been highlighting.

My plea is that let’s stop being nihilistic embrace the ideology of life and let's live.

As I advised Mrs. Badenoch, in my earlier intervention, in politics, it is better to be inclusive than exclusive. Hence you can not afford to ostracize yourself through alienation. Having made your point, you must tone down your rhetoric so that you can earn the goodwill of Africa-Uk voters who you will need when you are allowed to contest for the UK premiership.

Justifiably, you are not like other minorities such as Rishi Sunak, who served as the UK’s Prime Minister without disparaging India, or Barack Obama, who became the US President without making negative comments about Kenya while pursuing his ambitions. The truth is that Sunak and Obama certainly did not have the type of traumatic experiences that you’ve cited as defining your perception of Nigeria. But that does not justify stigmatizing your ancestral country.

So you will be relieved if you eschew bitterness and try to exorcise yourself of the sordid memories of Nigeria driving your angst. Most importantly, you need to free your mind and stay focused on your goal of becoming the next Prime Minister of the UK, and by God's grace, your dream will materialize.

And don’t forget: if you succeed, you will still need Nigeria.

Magnus Onyibe
Entrepreneur, public policy analyst, author, democracy advocate, development strategist, alumnus of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Massachusetts, USA, and a former commissioner in the Delta State government, sent this piece from Lagos, Nigeria.

To continue with this conversation and more, please visit www.magnum.ng.

In a world where representation matters, two Nigerians, Kemi Badenoch and Ademola Lookman, stand as symbols of success on different stages. However, the paths they have carved out offer distinct lessons about identity, ambition, and the diverse definitions of what it means to represent Nigeria.

To explanatorily put the forgoing in its contextual perspective, it is not a misnomer to recall that Kemi Badenoch, a British Conservative politician, who currently serves as the UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade was born in Wimbledon, London, to Nigerian parents and raised partially in Lagos, has risen to prominence in a system where diversity in leadership has historically been limited.

Badenoch has consistently emphasized her Nigerian roots, recounting childhood experiences in Lagos and her journey through British society. However, her alignment with conservative policies, especially on issues like immigration and race relations, has often sparked debates. While some criticize her for what they perceive as a detachment from the struggles of immigrants and minorities, others celebrate her as a trailblazer breaking barriers in the highest echelons of British politics.

Her trajectory underscores the power of adaptability and the importance of navigating complex systems with strategic finesse. Badenoch’s story inspires Nigerians to see the global stage as an arena where their voices can influence policies and narratives.

Yet, this success comes with complexities. Her critics in Nigeria often question whether her policies align with the hopes and aspirations of her ancestral homeland. While she has occasionally acknowledged her Nigerian heritage, her focus remains firmly on the British electorate, a necessary priority in her role as a UK government official. Her career trajectory highlights the delicate balance many diaspora Nigerians must strike between representing their roots and thriving in adopted nations.

In contrast, Ademola Lookman represents a different brand of Nigerian excellence. Born and raised in England, the talented footballer embraced his Nigerian heritage by switching allegiance from England to Nigeria in international football. This decision was not just a personal choice; it was a statement of pride and connection to his ancestral home.

Lookman’s exploits on the pitch, including his impressive performances for Atalanta in Serie A and the Nigerian Super Eagles, have endeared him to fans across the globe. His commitment to representing Nigeria highlights a sense of loyalty that transcends national borders. Lookman’s Nigerian roots are not just a backdrop to his career, they are central to his identity and the choices he has made as an athlete.

A defining moment that showcased Lookman’s pride in his Nigerian heritage was his acceptance speech at the 2024 CAF Awards, where he was named African Player of the Year. In his heartfelt speech, Lookman spoke in Yoruba language, as he thanked his fans, teammates, and the Nigerian Football Federation. This moment resonated deeply with Nigerians, who saw in Lookman’s words a reflection of their collective pride and resilience.

His ability to exert his “Nigerianese” on such a global stage is a testament to his understanding of what it means to be Nigerian in today’s interconnected world. Unlike many diaspora athletes who often shy away from overt displays of their heritage, Lookman embraced it fully, cementing his place as a cultural and sporting ambassador for Nigeria.

While Badenoch’s journey reflects a narrative of breaking ceilings in global politics, Lookman’s story is one of embracing grassroots connections. Badenoch works within the framework of British society, often prioritizing her adopted nation’s interests over her Nigerian heritage. In contrast, Lookman’s decision to play for Nigeria is a deliberate act of embracing his roots and contributing to the nation’s identity on the global stage.

The differences between Badenoch and Lookman’s approaches to their Nigerian heritage are striking. Badenoch’s Nigerian roots often appear as a footnote in her political narrative, while Lookman places his heritage front and center. Badenoch’s success demonstrates how Nigerians can thrive in international systems by assimilating and excelling within established structures. On the other hand, Lookman’s career highlights the power of cultural pride and the importance of connecting with one’s origins, even in the face of global challenges.

Both Badenoch and Lookman teach important lessons. Badenoch reminds us that Nigerians can compete and excel in any sphere, even at the highest levels of global governance. Her story is one of courage and resilience in a demanding political landscape. On the other hand, Lookman’s choice teaches the value of loyalty and the importance of reconnecting with one’s heritage, even when it might not guarantee personal glory or convenience.

Their stories also reveal the different ways Nigerians can contribute to national and global narratives. Badenoch’s influence lies in shaping policies that, while primarily benefiting Britain, still position Nigerians as capable leaders in global arenas. Lookman’s impact, meanwhile, is felt more directly by Nigerians who see him as a source of national pride and a representative of their collective aspirations.

The dichotomy between Kemi Badenoch and Ademola Lookman’s experiences also highlights the broader question of how the Nigerian diaspora can best represent their heritage. Should success be measured by one’s ability to influence global systems, as Badenoch does, or by one’s commitment to directly uplifting and connecting with their roots, as Lookman exemplifies? Perhaps the answer lies in a combination of both approaches, leveraging global platforms to create meaningful change while staying deeply connected to one’s heritage.

Like Kemi Badenoch, Nigerians can dare to dream big, stepping into global arenas with confidence and purpose. Unlike Ademola Lookman, some might choose to prioritize external influence over local connection. Yet, both paths hold valuable lessons for Nigerians navigating their roles in an increasingly interconnected world.

Ultimately, whether in politics or sports, these individuals showcase the extraordinary potential of Nigerians to excel, inspire, and make a difference, both at home and abroad. As Badenoch shapes policies that affect millions and Lookman continues to thrill fans with his prowess on the pitch, they remind us that there is no single path to success. What matters most is staying true to one’s values, embracing one’s identity, and making a lasting impact, wherever one’s journey leads.

There is confusion at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) as embattled chairman, Danladi Umar and the newly appointed chairman, Mainasara Kogo, are laying claim to its chairmanship.

Inquiries by Daily Trust indicate that both persons have officially visited and held discussions with staff of the tribunal without any clear directive on who is in charge.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had on July 13 appointed Kogo as the new chairman of CCT the same day he announced Omolola Oloworaran as the Director-General of the National Pension Commission (PenCom).

Although the staff complained about the lull in the work of the tribunal since the controversy over Umar’s removal began, it was observed that corruption cases involving public servants are still being taken with several charges listed on the course list either for trial or arraignment.

 We are confused – Staff

However, senior staff of the tribunal, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told Daily Trust that they are confused about who to work with as both men have spoken with them and they are only civil servants who obey instructions.

“We are civil servants and we believe we can work with anyone that comes,” a staff said.

“We have not seen any letter to the effect of these changes. We believe there is a procedure for the removal and appointment of a new chairman of the CCT.

“We know that the president and the two arms of government have made pronouncements but we don’t know if invisible hands are working on these but we know there is a process,” he added.

One of the officials said the process is for the appointee to go through the screening by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC), who recommends to the National Judicial Council (NJC) and then to the President, who approves and forwards to the Senate for confirmation.

The senior official said there has been a pile of unattended files arising from a lack of clarity on the chairmanship of the tribunal.

“He came today and left and the entire judiciary is now on holiday so we have taken the liberty to adjourn all the outstanding cases to January,” the witness said.

However, a former staff of the tribunal, who pleaded anonymity, criticised Umar for visiting the office after what he said his valid removal.

“Why is he still coming to work seeking to sign some documents and approve payments to contractors?”

He said Umar’s visits were illegal as he was no longer the chairman of the commission.

Umar’s removal endorsed by Senate, Reps

After the presidential announcement removing Umar, both the Senate and the House of Representatives in separate plenaries on November 20 and 26, also endorsed his removal as CCT chairman on allegations of misconduct and corruption.

Both resolutions were hinged on Section 17 (3) Part 1, Fifth Schedule of the Nigerian Constitution and Section 22 (3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act 2004 for the decision.

The section provides that “A person holding the office of chairman or member of the code of conduct tribunal shall not be removed from his office or appointment by the president except upon an address supported by 2/3rd majority of each house of the national assembly praying that he be so removed for inability to discharge the functions of the office in question (whether arising from infirmity of mind or body) or for misconduct or for contravention of this code.”

The legal dispute over Umar’s tenure is being tested in a suit before a Federal High Court in Abuja by the Community Rescue Initiative, Toro Concerned Citizens and Relief Foundation, who are contending that by the provisions of sections 1(1) and (3), 6(6), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph (3)(a) (vii) and (b) of the Third—Schedule thereof, the purported concurrence of both Senate and the House of Representatives was null, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever.

Umar has not been validly removed – Lawyers

Lawyers have picked holes in the process that has created the situation in the CCT with both Umar and Kogo claiming leadership of the tribunal.

Reacting, Sunusi Musa (SAN) said the president did not announce Umar’s removal as provided by the constitution, which states that he can only do so after a resolution of two-thirds of the two houses of the National Assembly.

He explained that at the same time, there have been no further announcements about Kogo’s appointment by the NJC after Umar’s purported removal.

“Where is he getting the powers to visit the tribunal if he has not been appointed by the NJC and has not been inaugurated as the chairman of the tribunal?,” he asked.

Similarly, Dayo Akinlaja (SAN) said if the newly announced chairman has not been issued any letter, which ought to be an instrument of appointment, his appointment is not binding.

He said a letter of appointment would imply that removal has been done which the person affected could then challenge “Not by taking the laws into his hands but through the judicial process.”

In his submission, Haroun Eze, Esq said there are some irregularities in the purported removal of the CCT chairman, Umar.

“The removal did not accord with the procedure for the removal of the CCT chairman and that is why the National Assembly provided that aspect by their resolutions for the removal,” he said.

“Even the resolution, to what extent does it conform to the provision of the Code of Conduct Tribunal Act, particularly Section 22?”

He said the Attorney General of the Federation ought to have commenced an action to establish a case of misconduct against the CCT chairman, which would have given the National Assembly the leeway to pass the resolution they did.

[DailyTrust]

Kemi Badenoch, Britain’s Leader of  Conservative Party and the leader of Opposition, while recently reflecting on her challenges of growing up in Lagos in the eighties had  described Nigeria  as a country  plagued by “fear, insecurity, and corruption”, a comment VP Kashim Shettima, groomed in an environment where leaders play the ostrich, found offensive. He therefore choose the event highlighting the contributions of Nigerian immigrants to national development in Abuja last week not only to acknowledge the Nigerian government’s pride in Badenoch’s achievements, but also to remind her of her right to remove the Kemi from her name instead of denigrating Nigeria.

Kemi Badenoch has since come under severe attack from all manners of self-proclaiming patriots and self-serving media platforms. But sure-footed Badenoch is not going to be intimidated by those who have chosen to play the ostrich instead of addressing the problems bedevilling Nigeria. She is therefore standing by her words.

“I tell the truth. I tell it like it is. I am not going to couch my words”, she added

Badenoch’s greatest advantage is that for her political socialization, she went through parents who as medical doctors bothered only about their patients without losing sleep over the larger society and her challenges. That she is believed to be on the right-wing of the Conservative Party should therefore not surprise anyone. That she was at 16 exposed to British “political culture whose components are “values, beliefs and emotional attitudes about how government ought to be conducted” (Samuel Beer) prepared her for her choice of politics as a career at 25.

Those  accusing her of singing one creed when she needed Nigerian voters at constituency level and another now that she has an ambition beyond leadership of her Conservative Party, should understand Badenoch is a political genius who knows how to make a choice that will not lead to future regret when faced with environmental limitations. She must be given credit for knowing how to exploit both her psychological and operational environments to her own advantage (Sprout and Sprout Journal of Conflict resolution1 (1957). The truth is that Kemi Badenoch did not achieve what many see as a miracle by accident. She came fully prepared.

British political culture coupled with her “very tough upbringing as a middle class living in a house in Lagos with no running water or electricity,” accounts for her strong character and readiness to fight her own battles.

As a Shadow Secretary for Housing Communities and Local Government, she publicly criticised Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman.  It was also claimed she had a confrontation with Canada over Canadian demands to lift the ban on hormone treated beef being sold to UK consumers.  In July 2024, The Guardian reported at least three officials working under Badenoch felt “pushed out” by “bullying and traumatising” behaviour, claims Badenoch denied and described as smears from former staff.

She has made her choice between Nigeria and Britain. “Our country” she once declared, “is not a dormitory for people to come here and make money. It is our home. Those we chose to welcome, we expect to share our values and contribute to our society. British citizenship is more than having a British passport but also a commitment to the UK and its people.” Sunday Telegraph- September 2024

Accusing Badenoch of unpatriotic behaviour therefore as some media platforms that falsely swear in the name of patriotism have tried to do long after declaring her loyalty to another country is to stand logic on its head. But we do understand “patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrels’ as argued by Samuel Johnson back in 1775. Nothing can be more paradoxical than the fact that those today swearing in the name patriotism yesterday served as promoters of Dele Farotimi, who as a leading light of the ‘Obidients’, a euphemism for an unquestioning group, went to US where he recklessly declared before an audience albeit without proof that “as I stand before you, a convicted drug baron is about to be sworn as president of my country”.

Noisy but empty activists and their promoters perhaps need a lesson in patriotism by America that recently elected a man who on account of over 36 convictions including corruption, women abuse, tax evasion, insurrection etc can be best described as a crook.

But back to Badenoch’s thesis. Was Nigeria under a siege between 1983 and 1999? The answer is yes to Lagosians except those below 35 years of age who were misled by their sponsors and some media platforms to visit violence on government and private properties in Lagos

Between 1984 and 1999, neither Muhammadu Buhari, Ibrahim Babangida, Gbolahan Mudashiru Marwa nor Olagunsoye Oyinlola had answer to insecurity in Lagos. Lagos in the words of Badenoch “was a place where almost everything seemed broken”; “there was no freedom either, the government deciding which school your child would go to, deciding what businesses could or could not operate all the way to arrests with no trial, state-sanctioned murder”.

She was right about “destructive government policies” including Babangida’s commercialization policies through which most of our public enterprises were sold at next to nothing to military fronts and Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) which opened our market to importation of manufactured goods which sounded the death knell of our budding industries, the collapse of our naira which marked the beginning of ‘japa’ syndrome of our educated youths.

Badenoch’s only error was describing the confusion as socialism. If anyone was practicing socialism at all, it is Britain that has in response to Karl Max prediction that capitalism carries within it enough contradiction to lead to its implosion, introduced welfare policies for the most vulnerable of their citizens.

But we have Badenoch to thank for bringing the past to pain because our youths who were denied the opportunity to study history do not understand where the rain started to beat us. Like it is in the north, where the almajiris are mere disposable instruments of political bargaining, Lagos’ urban immigrants are canon fodders in the war against their Lagos host that give them succour.

While it is true that many of the Lagos State developmental projects from rail line to General Hospital in all LGAs were the brainchild of Jakande, contrary to claims by revisionists posing as journalists, change of fortune for Lagos did not come until after 1999 when Bola Tinubu started clearing refuse dumps that enveloped Lagos, earning the city the description of ‘the dirtiest city in the world’.

There was also general insecurity as Badenoch had pointed out. Lagos residents were routinely attacked in broad day light on Oshodi bridge, and Ketu bridge while Mile Two and Okokomaiko were no-go areas after 7pm. It was Bola Tinubu who found answer to insecurity challenges that defied Marwa’s heroic efforts and rehabilitation of collapsed Lagos roads Oyinlola could not find bitumen to mend.

Let me share my own personal experience with you dear readers. I live in an estate not too far from Lagos State Secretariat.  It is not unusual to see through your window as many as 15 AK-47 wielding robbers some nights. There was in fact particular house down the street said to belong to Senator Chuba Okadigbo’s friend that was under periodic attack. The poor man, with a small stature had to be kept inside a water tank by his wife the last time they came.

And when they came for me, I was left with nothing except the boxer I was wearing and my lacerated palms I was using to wade off machete attack aimed at my head while my wife and I were on our knees. A neighbour we fondly call Emir in the estate came to give me something to wear the following morning. The massive alarm machine Marwa encouraged us to procure from Lagos State and mounted on our building was useless when the marauders came calling

I was tempted to flee like many of my neighbours. But I was held back by the pains of going to procure cement directly from West African Portland Cement, going to buy sand in Alapere, going to Nigerite to negotiate rebate for roofing sheets with Yemisi Shyllon and following Engineer Bella to Ijebu Ode to buy planks.

My family weathered the storm but my children who often woke up at the slightest sound in the night, like Badenoch, bore the scars.

Tinubu brought sanity back to Lagos in 1999.  For us in my estate, all he did was taking government off our back by creating LDAs for us. I think we got two armed police men. Residents taxed themselves by contributing money to procure transformers and to tar some of the inner roads. Heaven as they say helps those who help themselves. Today our estate is one of the most peaceful in Lagos.

Except anti-Tinubu and anti-Lagos sponsored EndSARS vandals and the Obidient children of hate and anger, those of us who live here since the eighties long before most of them were born or came as fortune seekers, are aware that the foundation of today’s peaceful and prosperous Lagos with network of roads, fly-overs, General Hospitals in all Local Government Areas, the Atlantic City, the blue and red rail lines were laid between 1999 and 2007. These are facts revisionist posing as journalists cannot change.

• FEC approves N47.96tr estimated expenditure
• President takes Bill to lawmakers tomorrow

The proposed Federal Government expenditure for 2025 will balance revenue, expenditure and borrowing, Coordinating Minister of the Economy Olawale Edun assured yesterday.

“Like governments around the world, we are concerned about achieving fiscal sustainability. It is about creating a balance between revenue, expenditure, and borrowing to foster an economy that can grow sustainably,” he said.

Edun spoke to State House reporters after the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved the N47.96tr projected expenditure for next year.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu presided over the meeting.

According to Edun, the estimates target a revenue of N24.82 trillion, leaving a deficit of N13 trillion.

The minister said the deficit will be financed through borrowing.

According to him, the N47.96tr projected expenditure represents a 36.8 per cent increase from this year’s budget.

He added that the N13.14 trillion deficit is equivalent to 3.89 per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Edun stated that the 2025 budget reflects the administration’s progress over the past 18 months, focusing on fiscal sustainability and economic growth.

He emphasized the importance of balancing revenue, expenditure, and borrowing to create a conducive environment for economic expansion.

The minister highlighted the role of private-sector investment in driving growth, creating jobs, and alleviating poverty, noting that private-sector-led economies, such as Nigeria’s, rely on investors to fund projects that enhance productivity and economic expansion.

“Investors play a critical role in boosting productivity, creating jobs, and bringing people out of poverty. Our reforms are aimed at creating an environment where private sector investment can thrive,” Edun explained.

He cited recent reforms under President Tinubu’s administration, including the removal of petroleum subsidy, market-driven foreign exchange policies, and electricity tariff adjustments, as key factors driving economic improvement.

Edun also pointed to growing investor confidence in the Nigerian economy, referencing announcements by Shell and Total of multi-billion-dollar investments in the country.

“These investments signal renewed confidence in our economy and are testament to the government’s ongoing reform agenda,” he noted.

The minister underscored that the 2025 budget prioritises essential government spending while fostering private-sector-led investments.

He also highlighted a significant milestone in the energy sector, with Nigeria resuming domestic refining of petroleum products for the first time in 25 years.

“For the first time in about 25 years, we are refining petrol domestically, not just for fuel, but also as raw materials for industries like pharmaceuticals, construction, and textiles,” he added.

The proposed 2025 budget, according to Edun, is designed to ensure critical government spending while paving the way for robust private-sector participation to drive long-term economic growth.

What estimates intend to achieve

Minister of Budget and Economic Planning Atiku Bagudu said FEC debated the proposals as presented by Director-General of Budget Office Tanimu Yakubu, which accommodates the adjustments directed by the President.

Bagudu, a former governor of Kabbi State and one-time senator, said: “Today, the Federal Executive Council approved the budget proposals for 2025 with amendments which Mr president directed, following a presentation to the Federal Executive Council, led by the Director General of the Budget Office, Tanimu Yakubu.

“The 2025 framework is based on oil price benchmark of $75 per barrel, oil production of 2.06 million barrels per day and exchange rate of one 1400 naira (to the dollar).

“All these are already included in the medium term expenditure framework which we have presented here, which have also been approved by the National Assembly.”

He explained that the 2025 fiscal plan aims to reinforce macroeconomic stability and foster growth across various sectors, including security gains and building on efforts to improve national stability.

The budget also hopes to enhance critical infrastructure to boost productivity, invest in education, health, and skill-building initiatives.

Similarly, it hopes to expand industrial activity to create jobs and diversify the economy; strengthen the National Agricultural Development Fund to support food security, and advance the gas and compressed natural gas (CNG) initiatives to reduce reliance on petrol.

Another area it focuses on is promoting affordable housing schemes to address the housing deficit.

Bagudu highlighted that these initiatives are designed to expand economic activity, create consumer credit opportunities, and ensure inclusive growth.

Following a presentation by the Director of the Budget Office, President Tinubu directed amendments to the proposal, incorporating comments from FEC members.

These adjustments aim to ensure fiscal prudence and alignment with national priorities, Bagudu stated.

Reflecting on the administration’s economic performance in 2024, Bagudu pointed to successes in reducing the deficit and achieving significant milestones in infrastructure, security, and economic stability.

“The 2025 budget builds on these gains to ensure sustained growth and development,” he stated.

According to the minister, the approved budget proposal will be presented to the National Assembly for legislative approval in the next 48 hours, following consultations with the lawmakers.

However, the presentation of the 2025 Appropriation Bill to the National Assembly by President Tinubu might not hold tomorrow (today).

Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, said discussions were ongoing that might lead to the postponement of the budget presentation to Wednesday.

The minister, who noted that the discussions were yet to be concluded, said the possibility is there that the budget will be presented to the National Assembly on Wednesday instead of the Tuesday earlier announced by the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio.

Akpabio, during plenary last week, announced that President Tinubu would present the 2025 budget on Tuesday.

[TheNation]

The Federal Government on Monday approved the 2025 budget proposal.

This follows the Senate’s endorsement of the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework 2025 – 2027 on November 22.

President Bola Tinubu will present the proposed N47.96tn budget to the joint session of the National Assembly on Wednesday. The exercise, earlier slated for Tuesday (today), was postponed to allow the executive arm to make final adjustments to the budget.

A top management official of the National Assembly confirmed the postponement on Monday, which was further corroborated by the Minister of State for Agriculture, Sabi Abdullahi.

Speaking to Senate Press Corps journalists on Monday, Abdullahi said, “The budget presentation has been postponed from Tuesday to Wednesday. The executive just needs to make one or two adjustments to the budget.”

Previously, Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, had announced during a plenary session that the President would present the budget on Tuesday at the House of Representatives chamber.

Akpabio added that plenary would begin at 10:30am to allow senators convene in the Red Chamber before proceeding in a procession to the House chamber for the presentation.

The forthcoming budget presentation is expected to align with the fiscal strategies outlined in these documents.

The revised schedule underscores the importance of ensuring all necessary refinements are made to the budget before it is formally presented to the legislature.

The budget size remains N47.96tn as the MTEF proposed, with new borrowings of N9.22tn, the Minister of the Budget and Economic Planning, Abubakar Bagudu, told journalists after the Federal Executive Council meeting at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja.

The council approved the MTEF and Fiscal Strategy Paper on November 14, 2024. The MTEF, a critical tool the FG uses to outline its fiscal strategy over three years, establishes macroeconomic assumptions and targets that guide national budgeting. It also includes projections of key economic variables such as oil prices, exchange rates, inflation and growth rates.

For the 2025-2027 period, the MTEF sets out parameters, including an oil price benchmark of $75 per barrel, an oil production target of 2.06 million barrels per day, an exchange rate of N1,400 to the US dollar, and a GDP growth rate of 4.6 per cent. Its projected aggregate expenditure for 2025 is N47.96tn, with planned borrowing of N13.8tn, equating to 3.87 per cent of GDP.

On Monday, Bagudu announced, “Today, the Federal Executive Council approved the budget proposals 2025 with amendments which Mr President directed following a presentation to the Federal Executive Council led by the Director-General of the Budget Office, Tanimu Yakubu.

“The 2025 framework is based on an oil price benchmark of $75 per barrel. Oil production of 2.06 million barrels per day; exchange rate of N1,400 (to the dollar). All these are already included in the medium-term expenditure framework we have presented here, which has also been approved by the National Assembly.

“So, the total projected revenue for 2025 stands at N34.82tn, out of which the expenditure is projected at N47.96tn, an increase of 36.8 per cent from the 2024 estimate. The deficit for 2025 is projected at N13.13tn, representing 3.89 per cent of GDP.”

He explained that comments were taken from council members and the President directed “some consequential adjustments while approving the figures.”

The disclosure comes after weeks of delay, even as President Bola Tinubu is yet to present the 2025 Appropriation Bill to the National Assembly. The President presented the 2024 budget on December 1, 2023.

Although Tinubu had, last week, informed the National Assembly of his intent to present the 2025 budget proposal on Tuesday, the council hinted at plans to shift the presentation to Wednesday, December 18.

The Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, told State House Correspondents that the National Assembly and the Executive are currently engaged in discussions and may postpone the budget presentation.

“The Executive and the National Assembly are currently engaged in discussions which may culminate in the shifting of the budget presentation to the federal lawmakers to Wednesday,” he said.

While Bagudu earlier argued that the FG would maintain the January-December budget implementation cycle, he later explained that the late signing of the budget would not disrupt the cycle.

He said the process would be seamless given that the Senate has approved the MTEF, which clarifies the budget size and its underlying assumptions.

He further noted that during the presentation of the 2024 budget, the President urged the National Assembly to carry out their oversight responsibilities diligently and scrutinise all executive proposals. In his 2024 budget speech, the President also directed ministries, departments, agencies, and particularly ministers to respect the role of the National Assembly.

The former Kebbi State Governor said this dynamic has helped bridge gaps between the executive and legislative branches as continuous engagement builds confidence and ensures transparency in the budget’s implementation.

“That, I believe, has helped improve confidence between the executive and the legislature to the extent that Mister President is determined to present the budget within 48 hours.

“It may be tough, but given all those confidence-building measures, we can’t pre-judge the National Assembly. But we believe that the National Assembly will expeditiously consider, given the track record, confidence and appreciation of the relationship with the executive, particularly with Mr President.

“However, I need to say here that our constitution has always anticipated that even if a budget is not passed by December 31, the executive can continue to incur expenditure, operate and spend money. It’s one of the ingenuities of Nigeria’s Constitution. So, while we hope that the budget will be signed, spending will be impaired because the Constitution anticipates that it could be the case that the budget may not be passed before the end of the year,” Bagudu explained.

He insisted that the country can meet and surpass the 2.06 million barrels-per-day crude oil production target in the MTEF.

“Is it achievable? I think that’s very achievable because we have done it before. Our national planning considerations were that by this time, we should have more than 3 million (barrels per day). And if you recall, NNPC has reported significant findings even outside the traditional areas of production, such as Kolmani and Nasarawa state, among others.

“So this is not too ambitious, but Mr President accepted it and is going to hold people accountable for these numbers,” Bagudu clarified.

On the 2024 budget performance, he said, “The 2024 budget has a revenue estimate of N25.8tn as of September 30, 2024 revenue inflows amount to N14.55tn, 75 per cent of the pro-rated amount. I’m sure it’s higher now because, given that this is as of September 30, driven by a robust performance in the non-oil revenue stream and the courageous deregulation of the petroleum sector, so the nation is no longer bleeding.

“On the expenditure side, the 2024 budget forecasted an expenditure of N21tn, with N8.9tn allotted to debt service, N4.2tn on personnel and N5.86tn was released for capital expenditure, of which MDAs utilised 51 per cent for projects.”

Bagudu said budget performance on debt service is 100 per cent.

“We are not defaulting. Part of what Mr President, led by the coordinating minister of the economy, convinced the investing public and the creditors that we would never default on our obligations, including the challenging non-recourse to Ways and Means beyond the legal limits.

“Equally, the performance on personnel and pension is about 100 per cent and the capital performance is about 51 per cent,” the minister said.

[Punch]

A new dawn may be in the horizon for Nigeria-South Africa relations. Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, during her closing remarks at the ministerial session of the 11th Nigeria-South Africa Bi-National Commission in Cape Town, South Africa, requested for South Africa’s support for Nigeria’s bid to attain full membership in the G20 – the grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, BRICS, and the New Development Bank – a multilateral development bank established by the BRICS states. Nigeria is also seeking South Africa’s support for leadership roles in thematic discussions of interest under South Africa’s G20 presidency, which officially began on December 1, 2024. 

The G20 or Group of 20, founded in 1999, is an intergovernmental forum comprising 19 sovereign countries, the European Union, EU, and the African Union, which works to address major issues related to the global economy. The sovereign states of the G20 alone (excluding the EU and AU) account for around 85 per cent of gross world product, GWP, 75 per cent of international trade, 56 per cent of the global population, and 60 per cent of the world’s land area. When the EU and the AU are included, the G20 comprises 78.9 per cent of global population and 83.9 per cent of global CO2 emissions from fossil energy.

BRICS, formerly called BRIC, until South Africa was included in the group in 2010, is an intergovernmental organisation currently made up of nine countries – Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates. It is now more popularly known as BRICS+ after the admission of new members during its 15th summit in August 2023.  BRICS institutions are considered an alternative to institutions such as those led by nations of the G7 bloc. Combined, the BRICS members encompass about 30 per cent of the world’s land surface and 45 per cent of the world’s population. All the five members (before the August 2023 expansion), are members of the G20, with a combined nominal GDP of US$28 trillion (about 27per cent of the gross world product), a total GDP (PPP) of around US$65 trillion (35per cent of global GDP PPP), and an estimated US$5.2 trillion in combined foreign reserves. 

As the only African member of both the G20, and the BRICS (until the August 2023 expansion which brought in Ethiopia and Egypt), membership in these groups give South Africa tremendous visibility at the tables where some of the most important global economic decisions are taken. South Africa also successfully hosted the World CUP in 2010 and equally successfully hosted the 15 BRICS summit in August 2023.  In the same 2023, South Africa led a high-powered African delegation that included Egypt, Senegal, Congo-Brazzaville, Comoros, Zambia, and Uganda and met both Presidents Zelensky of Ukraine and Putin of Russia with a 10-point proposal to end the Russo-Ukraine war.

Though the delegation received lukewarm reception from both the Ukrainian and Russian Presidents, it was probably the first time that Africans had the confidence to try to broker peace for warring European nations.  The effort alone was an indication that South Africa is becoming a major player not just in economic affairs (as indicated by its membership of both the G-20 and BRICS) but also in the political arena.

Perhaps because of the above, there has been a sort of Cold War between Nigeria and South Africa since the end of Apartheid in South Africa in 1994. Elsewhere I called the attitude of some Nigerians to South Africa’s economic and political successes as ‘South African envy’.  Such Nigerians wrongly see South Africa as usurping the roles that should belong to their country. This sense of entitlement comes to the fore very often when Nigerian leaders speak. Nigerian leaders also never fail to remind anyone who cares to listen of the country’s contributions towards the end of the Apartheid regime in South Africa, forgetting that in international relations, the respect a country commands is not dependent on its past benevolence but on the current leverages it brings to the table.  

Besides a certain entitlement for its contributions in the fight against Apartheid in South Africa, Nigerians often boast of their population and mineral resources. For instance, in responding to the disparaging remarks against Nigeria by Kemi Badenoch, the leader of Britain’s Conservative party, whose parents are Nigerians, Vice President Shettima boasted that “the greatest Black nation on earth is the nation called Nigeria.”.  He further boasted:  “One out of every three, four Black men is a Nigerian and by 2050, Nigeria will surpass the United States, and will be the third most populous nation on earth.” 

Unfortunately many Nigerians – like VP Shettima – seem to wrongly believe that having a big population, on its own, is necessarily evidence of global power. It is not. What, if one may ask, was the population of Britain at the time when it had the British empire from 1583 – 1997? The British Empire governed over 458 million people which was about 20 per cent of the world’s population and controlled 33,670 square kilometres which covered over 25 per cent of the Earth’s land area.

Remarkably the UK’s population at that time was a mere 43 million people. Have we ever heard China, with a population of 1.411 billion people (as of 2023) or India with a population of 1.429 (as of 2023), boasting of its population? It is the same  sense of entitlement when we boast of our natural resources, essentially our oil and gas resources, forgetting that these, on their own, cannot make any country great and therefore cannot be a valid metric for our sense of entitlement. In any case almost every other African country is now also an oil-producing country. 

In essence, when Nigeria requested for South Africa’s assistance for its bid to attain full membership in the G20, BRICS, and the BRICS’ New Development Bank, and for it to be given leadership roles in thematic discussions of interest under South Africa’s G20 presidency, it is literally coming down from its high horse. By implicitly accepting South Africa’s leadership role in the continent, it makes it easier for collaboration between the two countries. And there is nothing to be ashamed of about it. America was a British colony and fought a bitter war of independence from Britain from April 19, 1775 – September 3, 1783. Today, Britain and the US are very close allies, with Britain accepting American leadership in recognition of the current realities and global configuration of power. If Britain had clung to the fact that America was once its colony and therefore deserved to be respected as the leader, that collaboration and alliance wouldn’t have been possible.

Perhaps the new tacit acceptance of South African leadership by Nigeria paved the way for the remarkably conciliatory speech by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, on the occasion of the South Africa-Nigeria Bi-National Commission on December 3 2024. In his speech, he signalled a willingness to work with Nigeria as partners and even acknowledged the role Nigeria played during the country’s struggle against Apartheid.

“We are two countries united in purpose and vision. We will remain forever grateful to Nigeria for its leading role in the international campaign to end apartheid in South Africa,” he said, and declared that he looked forward to seeing more Nigerian companies investing in South Africa, while announcing a simplified visa process for Nigerian business people to travel to South Africa. Under the simplified visa process, qualified Nigerian business people can be granted a five-year multiple entry visa. Additionally, tourists from Nigeria will be able to apply for a visa without submitting a passport. 

South Africa will also benefit from an improved cooperation with Nigeria. There are over 100 South African businesses in Nigeria, with the leading ones being MTN Group, Shoprite, Multichoice, Standard Bank, Remgro, Pick ‘n Pay Holdings, Clover Industries and Naspers. In contrast there are less than ten registered Nigerian companies in South Africa – not counting churches. Six Nigerian companies invested at least $142m in South Africa between 2008 and 2020, with the Dangote Group and GZI accounting for the lion’s share of the investment. In 2021, Nigeria’s Access Bank acquired South Africa’s Grobank for $60m. 

The Nigerian fintech company, Paystack, and airline, Air Peace, also have imprints in the South African business environment. Several Nigerian businesses have, however, experienced little success in South Africa. Companies in this category include Thisday Group, Arik Air, and Bellview Airlines. Similarly, a raft of South African businesses has in recent years exited Nigeria – from popular supermarket chain, Shoprite Holdings, to the less-known Nampak, Africa’s biggest packaging company. A closer relationship will help the two countries to work around these challenges, including communal level issues affecting Nigerians living in South Africa which has led to episodic attacks in the country against African migrants. 

The bilateral trade between Nigeria and South Africa has also been growing and reached $1.6bn in 2006, up from $16.5m in 1999. Nigeria accounts for over 60% of South Africa’s trade in West Africa, and as of 2020, trade between both countries stood at $2.9bn – with the balance of trade tilting in favour of Nigeria which mostly exports oil to the country. In 2021 Nigerian exports were valued at $2.23bn (mostly from exporting oil products) while South African exports stood at $569m.  Improved relations between the two countries will further boost bilateral trade. 

The crucial question now is whether the Nigeria-South Africa Bi-National Commission, will now walk the talk?

It is important to emphasize that just as talents are not evenly distributed in any federation, there is also ‘ethnic socialisation’’ by people who operate from the other side of the moral divide. For instance when we mention drug dealing, credit card fraud, ‘Yahoo Yahoo’, religious fundamentalism, prostitution abroad or militancy, accusing fingers would be pointing in different ethnic directions. This means that despite what the Internet Warriors would want us to believe, no ethnic group should pretend to occupy the moral high-ground or feel better or worse than others.

Seven, while living in Europe I saw myself as an Africanist, and used my publishing firm and my writings to challenge theories or innuendos that maligned Africa or ruled out development and democratic possibilities for the continent. However, as I get older, I tell people that I am no longer an Africanist but a humanist. This is because with age and experience one realises that every race, ethnic group, community and even kindred, is an embodiment of the good, the bad and the really horrible.  As the American writer and historian, James Tuslow Adams, would put it:  “There is so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, that it ill behoves any of us to find fault with the rest of us.”

*Jideofor Adibe is Professor of Political Science at Nasarawa State University, Keffi.