FEATURES

FEATURES

Suspected herdsmen have shot a Catholic priest along the volatile Makudi-Naka road in Benue State.

The Catholic priest, Rev Fr.Solomom Atongo was attacked on Saturday evening.

A statement by Rev.Joseph Beba, who is the Chairman, Diocesan Priests, revealed that Rev. Atongo was shot on Makurdi-Naka road on his way from Naka, headquarters of Gwer West Local Government Area.

The victim is the priest in charge of St Johns Quasi Parish, Jimba.

Rev Atongo was said to be in critical condition as he was immediately rushed to the hospital for treatment.

The Makurdi-Naka road has become the epicenter of herdsmen violence in the past two years.

The road has been abandoned due to the activities of hoodlums who kidnap and kill people on the road.

DAILY POST gathered that Fr. Atongo was in the company of two people when the hoodlums struck.

After shooting the priest and thinking he was dead, the herders reportedly whisked away the other persons to an unknown destination.

There is no information about their whereabouts as of the time of filing this report.

[DailyPost]

Former Chief Whip of the Senate, and Senator representing Borno South, Ali Ndume, has said the new appointment of northerners by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu into key government parastatals and agencies has addressed the imbalance in his previous appointments.

Recall that in the announcement on Friday, 12 individuals from the North were placed into strategic national positions.

They are Yazid Shehu Umar Danfulani (Zamfara) as Managing Director, Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation (NAIC); Alhaji Hamza Ibrahim Baba (Kano) as Programme Manager, Government Enterprise and Empowerment Programme (GEEP); Alhaji Abubakar Umar Jarengol (Adamawa) Executive Director, Operations – Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation (NAIC), Barrister Sama’ila Audu (Katsina).

Others are Executive Director, Administration – Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF), Professor Musa Garba Mai Tafsiri (Kebbi), Executive Secretary, National Commission for Mass Literacy, Adult and Non-Formal Education, Comrade Isa Aremu, (Kwara) and Director-General, Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies (MINILS).

Ndume in a statement on Saturday described the appointments as a reflection of President Tinubu’s commitment to inclusive governance.

Recall that Senator Ndume had last month expressed concerns over “lopsidedness” in the Tinubu administration’s appointments which he described as a clear violation of the Federal Character principle enshrined in the 1999 Constitution.

In his new statement, the senator said, “President Tinubu is someone who surrenders to constructive criticisms. I have known him to be a fair minded, cosmopolitan person. Yes, we are all bound to make mistakes. No one is infallible.

“The hallmark of a good leader and statesman is to quickly adjust when he takes a decision or makes a policy pronouncement that a large section of the people find unpopular and uncomfortable with.

“This recent appointment of Northerners into key positions in Federal parastatals and agencies was meant to address the imbalances thrown up by his previous appointments which left the North stranded.”

[DailyTrust]

In Nigeria, family planning is often considered a woman’s responsibility, and this gendered perception continues to shape reproductive health decisions across the country.

While modern contraceptive methods have the potential to ease population growth, improve maternal health, and reduce poverty, many Nigerian men remain sceptical or outright resistant to family planning.

Despite efforts by health organisations, the uptake of family planning remains relatively low, particularly among married women in Northern Nigeria.

According to the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, the contraceptive prevalence rate among married women is just 17 per cent, with even lower rates in rural areas. Experts say this slow progress can be largely attributed to male opposition.

What exactly drives this resistance? To understand the roots of this opposition, one must explore a web of cultural, religious, social, economic, and psychological factors.

Nigeria’s population surge

Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is experiencing an explosive population surge that poses significant challenges for sustainable development.

According to the World Bank, Nigeria’s population, currently estimated at over 220 million, is projected to surpass 377 million by 2050, making it the third most populous country in the world after India and China.

This demographic trajectory, while offering potential in human capital, also presents critical risks if not matched with commensurate investments in healthcare, education, and economic infrastructure.

Among the most vulnerable to the consequences of unchecked population growth are rural communities, where access to reproductive health services remains limited and cultural resistance to family planning is often deeply entrenched.

The scale

According to data from the United Nations Population Fund, nearly 44 per cent of Nigeria’s population is under the age of 15.

The country’s fertility rate stands at approximately 5.3 births per woman, with rural areas often recording higher rates due to limited contraceptive use and poor access to maternal health services.

This creates pressure on local resources, education systems, and employment opportunities.

UNICEF Nigeria has warned that unless urgent steps are taken to manage population growth through voluntary family planning, the country risks exacerbating poverty, food insecurity, and healthcare shortfalls.

Rural communities bear the brunt of Nigeria’s population boom. In states such as Niger, Zamfara, and Kebbi, large families are common, often viewed as a sign of wealth or divine blessing. In many of these areas, women have little say in reproductive decisions, with patriarchal norms dominating household choices.

Mrs Grace Tanko, a midwife serving in the FCT, noted that many rural women are not aware of modern contraceptive methods.

“In many villages, family planning is still seen as a foreign concept, or worse, as an attempt to reduce the African population,” she noted. “Some women want to space or limit births but are afraid of their husbands or community backlash.”

Cultural norms, patriarchy

Nigeria’s patriarchal society bestows significant decision-making power on men, especially in the family unit.

According to a public health physician, Dr Chinyere Mbachu, “In many homes, men make all major decisions, including those regarding reproduction.”

In some ethnic groups, a man’s wealth and status are measured by the number of children he has. Among the Hausa and Fulani in the North, and even among parts of the Igbo and Yoruba ethnicities, large families are seen as a sign of strength, blessing, and social security.

Anthropologist Mercy Ifijeh explains that many men believe that children are assets: labour on farms, inheritors of lineage, and caretakers in old age.

“This belief fuels resistance to family planning, which is seen as limiting blessings,” she added.

Misinformation, fear of side effects

Another key reason for male resistance is the widespread misinformation about contraceptives. “There is a common myth among men that family planning will make their wives promiscuous or infertile,” says Dr Ifeoma Ezike, a physician.

Some men also fear that hormonal contraceptives could cause long-term health complications. While minor side effects like weight gain or mood changes can occur, they are usually manageable.

Yet, due to inadequate counselling and education, these fears often go unchallenged.

A 2020 study published in Contraception and Reproductive Medicine showed that over 45 per cent of Nigerian men surveyed believed that family planning leads to permanent infertility. This false belief fuels hostility.

Masculinity, sexual control

For some men, resisting family planning is about control over sex, reproduction, and their partners. 

“There’s this idea that if a woman is on birth control, she won’t fear getting pregnant and will be more likely to cheat,” says counsellor Ngozi Amadi, of the Women’s Rights and Health Project in Lagos.

This idea reflects deep-rooted insecurities about trust and fidelity, often tied to traditional gender roles.

In a society where many women rely economically on their husbands, men often feel threatened by anything that might give women more autonomy over their bodies.

Low male involvement in reproductive health

Despite being key decision-makers, many Nigerian men are not actively involved in family planning education.

Mbachu said, “Most campaigns are targeted at women, leaving men feeling excluded and suspicious.”

Only a few clinics have male-friendly reproductive health services. Male-focused education, either through community meetings or faith-based outreach, remains inadequate.

Economic considerations, poverty

Ironically, while large families are often pursued for economic reasons, they also strain limited household resources.

Yet the idea that more children equate to more income is persistent.

 

Economist Oladayo Adenubi notes, “In agrarian societies, children are seen as free labour. The idea is that you produce more children to help with farming, street trading, and other informal jobs.”

Family planning is wrongly seen as a luxury for the elite, rather than a tool for poverty reduction.

According to a 2022 report by the World Bank, countries with higher contraceptive prevalence generally have stronger maternal health indices and lower child mortality rates.

What some Nigerian men are saying

Some men have begun to speak out in favour of family planning.

In an interview with Sunday PUNCH, Lagos-based tailor Abdulrahman Adeyemo shared, “After our fourth child, I told my wife to go for family planning. We couldn’t keep up with school fees and rent.”

Likewise, a teacher in Anambra, Samuel Uzo, revealed, “I used to be against it. But my wife had back-to-back pregnancies. We agreed on the implant, and our lives are better now.”

However, several others said family planning makes women promiscuous.

A 42-year-old mechanic in Owerri, Imo State Chukwudi Dimkpa, insists he will never allow his wife to take contraceptives.

“Once a woman knows she can’t get pregnant, she starts misbehaving. Before you know it, she’ll be sleeping around because there’s no consequence,” he said.

Similarly, a trader in Kaduna, Mallam Idris, who spoke to our correspondent over the telephone, viewed contraception as a slippery slope.

“Islam says children are a blessing. But also, when a woman doesn’t fear pregnancy, she can forget her boundaries.”

In Lagos, a retired civil servant, Mr David Abayomi, sees birth control as an invitation to marital discord.

“You want your wife to be faithful, not to start feeling too free. If she’s not scared of getting pregnant, she may start experimenting. You don’t know these women,” he said in an interview with Sunday PUNCH.

Medics call for inclusive campaigns

Health experts argue that more inclusive, culturally sensitive campaigns are crucial to change the narrative.

According to Dr Amaka Eze of the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, “Men need to see family planning as beneficial to the family, not as a threat to masculinity.”

NURHI and other NGOs have begun organising couple-centred clinics where both partners receive counselling.

Faith-based organisations are also stepping in, like the Federation of Muslim Women’s Associations in Nigeria, which educates imams on medically acceptable forms of contraception.

Religious beliefs, doctrines

Religion plays a huge role in shaping attitudes toward contraception. In the North, where Islam predominates, some clerics preach that family planning interferes with divine will.

For example, a prominent Islamic cleric in Kano State, Sheik Ibrahim Khalil, once stated in a public sermon that “family planning encourages moral laxity and goes against the teachings of Islam.”

However, there are divergent views within the Islamic community. Some progressive scholars refer to the Prophet Muhammad’s allowance of ‘azl (coitus interruptus) as implicit approval of family planning under specific conditions. International Islamic authorities such as the Islamic Fiqh Academy, under the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, have issued fatwas permitting contraception, provided both spouses consent and no harm is caused.

Despite these theological flexibilities, many Muslim-majority states in Nigeria remain unreceptive, partly due to local clerics’ influence and the association of family planning with Western liberalism and perceived moral decay.

Christian views on family planning vary widely depending on denomination. The Roman Catholic Church maintains a firm stance against artificial birth control, promoting Natural Family Planning instead.

The Church’s teachings, based on the 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae, assert that procreation must remain open in every sexual act.

Bishop Lucius Ugorji of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria reaffirmed this view during a conference in Enugu, stating, “The use of contraceptives undermines the sanctity of human life and marriage.”

Pentecostal and Evangelical churches present a more varied picture. While some pastors endorse contraceptive use as a means of responsible parenting, others strongly oppose it.

Pastor Chris Okotie of the Household of God Church in Lagos, for instance, has spoken against contraceptives, associating them with promiscuity.

Yet there are prominent Christian voices in support. Reverend Father Anselm Adodo, a Benedictine monk and pharmacist, has written extensively on the importance of family planning to reduce maternal mortality and improve the quality of life.

“They say, ‘Why should you control what God has destined?”, says Reverend Godwin Okoh of Lagos.

This misunderstanding of religious texts has led many men to reject family planning.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, if all Nigerian women had access to modern contraceptive methods, unintended pregnancies would drop by 85 per cent, significantly reducing maternal and infant mortality.

For rural dwellers, this could mean fewer unsafe abortions, improved maternal health, and increased opportunities for women to participate in economic activities.

Policy, legal landscape

Contrary to popular belief, there is no law in Nigeria that limits the number of children a family may have.

However, several government policies encourage family planning as a means of achieving sustainable development.

The National Population Policy, revised in 2004 and again in 2019, promotes access to reproductive health services and aims to reduce fertility rates through voluntary methods.

Despite these efforts, implementation remains weak, particularly in rural regions.

Many local governments lack the infrastructure, trained personnel, and consistent funding to provide quality family planning services.

To address Nigeria’s population challenge, especially in underserved areas, a multipronged approach is essential.

Experts have advised that the government and NGOs invest in rural health centres and mobile outreach to deliver family planning tools and education.

Religious and traditional leaders have also been called upon to dispel myths and encourage dialogue.

[Punch]

  • Shuns Osun governor, party chiefs during visit
  • Aregbesola’s, Adeleke’s alliance heads for the rocks
  • Fresh confusion over proposed PDP NEC meeting
  • Atiku, Obi, El-Rufai, Amaechi, others meet today
  • Obi: I’ll run on Labour Party’s platform in 2027

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar  appears to have drawn the battle line with state governors elected on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) , and officials of the party who are opposed to his bid to enter into coalition with other political parties against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Despite Atiku’s insistence on a coalition, believing it is the only way the APC can be defeated in 2027, the PDP has stoutly rejected the move.

The PDP says it is strong enough to wrest power from the APC and that all it needs to do is to put its house in order.

In this regard, it set up a reconciliation committee headed by a former President of the Senate, Dr Bukola Saraki.

On Friday, Atiku was in Osun State where he shunned the state governor ,Senator Ademola Adeleke and the  state executives of the  party.

 

Officials  of the PDP yesterday interpreted the action of the ex – Vice President as a declaration of hostility.

“He has drawn the battle line because our governors are not with him in his move to forge a coalition and then run for president as usual,” a source in the PDP national secretariat told our correspondent yesterday.

The former vice president and his allies in the coalition talks are due to meet in Abuja today for more discussion on the way forward.

Top on the meeting’s agenda  is the platform they intend to use for the 2027 election.

Presidential candidate of  the Labour Party in the 2023 election, Peter Obi, who is widely speculated  as Atiku’s possible running mate in 2027 said yesterday that he still looks forward to contesting the election on the platform of LP,  which means he is unlikely to go along with the coalition.

Political sources said yesterday that Gov.Adeleke may have incurred Atiku’s wrath on account of  his (governor’s) stand on the coalition being promoted for  the former VP’s 2027 presidential bid.

Atiku had gone to  the state for the coronation of the new Owa of Ijesaland, HRH Adesuyi Haastrup.

He also  refused to meet with the Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Sunday Bisi and other members in the state.

Instead he  paid a courtesy call on ex-Governor Rauf Aregbesola, who is his new coalition ally.

According to findings,  Atiku’s cold attitude shocked Adeleke and PDP members in the state.

It was gathered that the ex-VP was unimpressed by lack of a firm commitment to his 2027 ambition by the governor and as a result, decided to draw the battle line early in the day with him.

Political observers in the state believe Atiku might have miscalculated because apart from being a sitting governor,  Adeleke’s popularity is at its peak in the state while Aregbesola’s influence is dwindling.

A senior government official, who spoke in confidence with our correspondent, said: “the ex-VP shocked the governor and PDP members by not notifying the state government of his visit. He did not pay a courtesy call on the governor and there was no notice to the state chapter of PDP of his coming.

“It is convenient for him to call his shuttle a private visit but as the former VP, he is under our care.

“It is a slight to shun the governor and visit Aregbesola in Ilesha. The message is clear to all. He has something up his sleeves.”

Asked what might have accounted for Atiku’s attitude,  the source said: “Maybe he is acting on body language or intuition to reach conclusions on Governor Adeleke who is amiable and amenable. I think for an experienced politician like Atiku, it is too early to arrive at any conclusion. He has a presumption that the governor has a mindset for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 2027.

“The second reason which is definitive is that Atiku is desperate for a new coalition and he knows that Governor Adeleke might not leave the PDP. Not coming to the governor was a message that he was done with the PDP.

“But Aregbesola cannot win Osun State for him in 2027. We wish Atiku good luck. His attitude has earned him more disdain than anything in Osun. It was a misstep.”

Atiku’s behaviour toward Adeleke was the subject of political discussion in many parts of the state all through Friday and yesterday. 

Atiku’s spokesman, Paul Ibe was yet to respond to questions sent to his WhatsApp line.

A PDP source said he wasn’t  surprised that  there is a political misunderstanding between the President and Governor Adeleke.

The source added: “As a matter of fact,  when Sen. Isiaka Adeleke died, President Tinubu wanted Governor Ademola Adeleke to succeed his brother but Aregbesola refused. Adeleke  was denied the ticket because of his closeness to the then President of the Senate  Dr. Bukola Saraki. He left APC for PDP and won the senatorial ticket.

“When the President asked why Governor Ademola Adeleke was refused APC senatorial ticket, the powers-  that-  be in Osun then  said he might contest for the  governorship. Asiwaju then asked ‘why not?’ Everything has come to pass, ” he said.

Unknown to many, a cold war has been brewing between  Adeleke and Aregbesola over their performances in office.

In the last few weeks,  Adeleke and Aregbesola have taunted each other at public functions in what appeared a sign of frosty relationship.

At a Rotary District  Conference in Ede, Osun State, Aregbesola,  who was the guest speaker,  spent quality time to reel out his achievements. He spoke of  how he transformed Osun State.

But  Adeleke, who came midway into Aregbesola’s lecture was ‘unsettled ‘  by what his predecessor said.

When it was his turn, Adeleke, who took style to say he was building on Aregbesola’s achievements, said the era of half salary was gone; he has not borrowed a dime; the Debt Management Office (DMO)  has confirmed that the  state  has cleared 40% of inherited debt since he  came into office.

He also said that he has completed a 14-kilometre dual carriageway in Ilesha and established University of Ilesha with 70 courses accredited.

“It is a matter of time before we end the alliance with Aregbesola, ” a PDP source added.

At a meeting  last month , PDP governors ruled out coalition with other parties for the 2027 presidential election.

The governors said the PDP was strong enough to oust the APC from power but welcomed any party that may want to join it.

Adeleke was at the meeting.

Atiku is nonetheless forging ahead with his bid to enter into coalition with interested parties.

 Last week, he and his coalition partners announced that they would use the ADP, instead of the SDP they had earlier announced, as the vehicle to realise their 2027 dream.

Atiku, others  push ahead with coalition despite PDP’s stance

 It was gathered yesterday that members of  the Atiku-led coalition will meet in Abuja today to perfect their plan ahead of 2027.

Some of those expected at the meeting are the immediate past governor of Kaduna State,Mallam Nasir El Rufai,former Transportation Minister Rotimi Amaechi and former Osun State governor Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola.

It was gathered that the group is banking on the support of the likes of the League of Northern Democrats (LND) which said last week that it was mobilising intensely across the north while considering the   options of registering a new opposition political party or fusing into an existing one.

It said in a communiqué that it would support the National Opposition Coalition Group chaired by Sen. President David Mark in “driving the transitional politics towards the 2027 general elections.”

 

I’ll contest on Labour Party’s platform, says Obi

Obi,in a video interaction with his supporters yesterday said he would contest the 2027 election on the platform of the LP.

 “I will still continue to run in the Labour Party. I’m a member of the Labour Party,” he said in response to  a question by one of his supporters.

He blamed the federal government for the crises in the PDP and LP,saying: “What is happening in the Labour Party and the PDP is caused by the government, quote me anywhere.

“We had a problem in our party before, in the past; Yar’Adua was the President. I went to him then; he called the INEC chairman (Prof. Maurice Iwu) and told him ‘I don’t want any problem in any party. We were forced to fix it.

“But today, in all the parties, there are problems; these are deliberate problems caused by the system. These are some of the things I want to clean up if I have the opportunity.

“Parties will function very well because you can’t have a system working without a strong opposition.”

No coalition yet, we are discussing how to move Nigeria forward, says Obidients’ National Coordinator

 National Coordinator of the Obidients Movement, Dr. Yunusa Tanko said there was no agreement in place yet on whether the group should join a  coalition of political parties ahead of the 2027 general election. 

Tanko told The Nation by  telephone that what is currently going on is discussion among respected Nigerians who are concerned about the way the country’s democracy is going.

He said ” It is just a group of persons who have tremendous respect for each talking about how to move the country forward.

“They are concerned about what is happening in our country and the way our democracy is going. They are concerned about reforming our electoral system to avoid what is going on right now when people are decamping anyhow.

Maybe if we had done this before now, people would  not be decamping the way they are doing now, taking the mandate of one party to another. It’s like having a football match and in the middle of the game, you jump from your team to the other because they are winning. If we allow that to continue, you won’t have anybody left in the opposing team to complete the game.”

Fresh confusion over PDP NEC meeting

A letter written  yesterday in the name of the embattled national secretary of the PDP,Samuel Anyanwu,has sparked confusion over the party’s much rescheduled National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting.

Daboikiabo  Warmate, spokesman to Anayanwu said in the letter that the NEC meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 27, 2025 had been put on hold owing to what he called constitutional breaches.

He claimed that  a purported letter illegally signed by the Deputy National Secretary, Setonji Koshoedo inviting party members to the meeting was in violation of the party’s constitution which authorized the substantive National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu to act in that line of duty.

According to the statement, the national Secretary of PDP, Most Distinguished Senator Samuel Nnaemeka Anyanwu, is neither aware  nor directed the Deputy National Secretary to issue such notice, therefore remains a nullity.

“We therefore, urge and advise all state chairmen and esteemed members of NEC of our great party to disregard, any of such notice of invitation that does not emanate from the National Secretary himself, the Most Distinguished Senator Samuel Nnaemeka Anyanwu till further notice”

While relying on the provision of the constitution of PDP, he  said, “It is expedient to emphasize that, following section 36 (1)b, of the PDP constitution as amended in 2017, it is one of the core responsibilities/functions of the National Secretary and not the Deputy National Secretary to issue notice of NWC, NEC, CAUCUS and CONVENTION.”

“And all extant and relevant laws in the PDP constitution as amended in 2017, and the supreme court judgement, points to the fact that, Most Distinguished Senator Samuel Nnaemeka Anyanwu, as always, remains the National Secretary of PDP and in due time will issue the notice.”

He told  party leaders, members, and critical stakeholders that the meeting would not take place  as scheduled until issues affecting the party were resolved.

Northern leaders endorse Tinubu for 2027, back reforms in security, economy, governance

 The Northern Bridge Builders Forum, a coalition of respected leaders from the 19 northern states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), yesterday threw  its weight behind President Bola Tinubu’s administration and endorsed him for a second term in 2027. 

The forum commended his sweeping reforms in security, the economy, local government autonomy, and national unity.

 Speaking during a press conference at the Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja, the Convener of the forum, Senator Joel Danlami Ikenya, said the group, made up of eminent personalities from the three northern geopolitical zones, gathered to evaluate the impact of federal government policies on the region and the nation since President Tinubu assumed office on May 29, 2023.

 According to Senator Ikenya, who was flanked by his members, the Northern Bridge Builders Forum resolved to support the President’s reform agenda while also proposing key recommendations to address rising security concerns and economic pressures in the region.

 The forum acknowledged the administration’s strategic focus on national security, particularly in the northern states plagued by insurgents, bandits, and other criminal groups. 

It hailed the proposed establishment of Armed Forest Guards, now before the National Assembly, as a commendable move to combat insecurity in forested areas.

 However, the forum raised the  alarm over renewed deadly attacks in states like Borno, Zamfara, Benue, Plateau, Katsina, Sokoto, and Niger, warning that groups such as Boko Haram, ISWAP, and other criminal gangs appear to have regrouped and rearmed.

 “The resurgence of violence in our communities is alarming. The wanton destruction of lives, farms, and properties reinforces fears that terrorist groups are once again gaining ground,” Ikenya said. 

The forum praised President Tinubu’s economic reforms, describing them as bold and necessary.

 While acknowledging the hardship that followed the removal of fuel subsidy, they said the increased monthly allocations to states and repayment of Nigeria’s IMF debts were signs of economic progress.

They also lauded the President for stabilising the currency and attracting foreign investments, referencing praise from the British High Commissioner as evidence of growing international confidence in Nigeria’s economy.

“Though the economic reforms have caused some short-term pain, we believe they lay the foundation for a more prosperous and stable Nigeria.

One of the key highlights of the forum’s deliberations was support for the implementation of local government autonomy. 

They hailed the Tinubu administration’s efforts, especially its successful legal battles at the Supreme Court to uphold the constitutional rights of local governments to financial independence.

The forum urged state governors to comply fully with the implementation, which they said would fast-track grassroots development and bring governance closer to the people.

The Northern Bridge Builders Forum applauded the President’s inclusive leadership style and efforts in promoting national cohesion across ethnic and religious lines.

 They described Tinubu’s approach as tolerant and dialogue-driven, citing the appointments of Vice President Kashim Shettima and SGF George Akume as symbols of northern inclusion in national leadership.

“The North is well represented and has confidence in the team Mr. President has assembled,” Senator Ikenya added.

In their final communiqué, the forum urged Nigerians to be patient and continue supporting the Tinubu administration’s reform agenda. 

They resolved to consolidate and sustain recent security gains, particularly in the North; urge the National Assembly to expedite the passage of the Armed Forest Guards Bill; provide timely farming inputs to improve food productivity; and introduce short-term economic relief measures to cushion the current hardship.

The forum publicly endorsed President Tinubu for a second term, citing his “visionary leadership and courage in initiating necessary reforms.”

“In view of the efforts so far, the Northern Bridge Builders Forum unequivocally endorses Mr. President, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, for a second term in 2027 to continue the good works he is doing,” Ikenya declared.

[pThe Nation]

UNTIL the metamorphosis of Governor Sheriff Oborevwori of Delta State from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC) last month, the latter never saw anything good and reassuring in his almost two years in office. The governor, his former party, PDP, and the APC were at daggers drawn practically over any policy or action the Oborevwori government took.

The APC took joy in pounding him from all corners.

Bombardment

 The APC’s Publicity Secretary, Valentine Onojeghuo, expressed disappointment over what his party described as the deteriorating state of infrastructure, governance, and social welfare in the state in a statement early this year.

The party noted that the state, under Oborevwori’s leadership, had witnessed a dramatic stalling of key projects, failure to deliver on crucial promises, and a general lack of the expected vision for sustainable progress despite receiving a mind-boggling federal allocation.

The statement read in part, “Deltans have been left in despair as their hopes for a better future continue to fade and now look like a distant mirage.

“The Delta APC notes that one of the key areas of concern includes infrastructure decay. “Presently, the state’s roads, especially in rural areas, are in deplorable condition as promises of road reconstruction and maintenance remain unfulfilled, leaving residents to contend with the daily struggle of impassable roads that hinder economic activities and the mobility of citizens.

“Furthermore, the education sector is in crisis as the educational institutions in the state are grappling with outdated facilities and a lack of support.

“The failure of the administration of Governor Oborevwori to invest adequately in schools and teachers is pushing the education sector into further decline, robbing our children of the quality education they rightly deserve.

“The health sector suffers from abject neglect; despite numerous promises to improve healthcare, our hospitals and clinics continue to suffer from inadequate staffing, poor facilities, and a lack of essential drugs and equipment.

“The lives of ordinary Deltans are now at risk, yet the Oborevwori administration has shown little or no interest in prioritizing this fundamental area.

“It is becoming clear to the people of Delta State that grand promises made by Governor Oborevwori during the campaigns are now gone with the wind, as so far, there has been little to show for them. 

“From job creation to improving security, the current administration has failed to live up to its commitments, leaving many wondering if there was nothing more than empty rhetoric.

April 30, also said, “We wish to categorically state that with his entry into the APC, Governor Sheriff Oborevwori assumes the position of the leader of the party in Delta State. This position is not subject to debate or contention.”

Referencing the Vice President Kashim Shettima’s remarks at the defection ceremony as affirmation of the governor’s new status, which, it said, was “authoritative, binding and final,” he said, “Delta APC finds it strange, arrogant and reprehensible for any individual to continue to arrogate or to parade himself as the leader of the Party in Delta State in clear opposition to the present reality.

“Anyone who seeks to undermine this position… will face severe sanctions from the party”.

‘It was all propaganda’

Speaking to Sunday Vanguard, a former Publicity Secretary of the PDP in Delta State, Chief Sunday Apah, said the development showed “all that they (APC) were doing was propaganda to score popularity.

Apah went on: “They were aware that the scorecard of Governor Oborevwori is huge; it is something that nobody can contend with.

“You see, since the defection, they have all been singing a new tune, which is that Governor Oborevwori is a good man, he is the best governor. We knew that what they were doing was just propaganda.”

Criticisms made Oborevwori do more –Ahon, CPS

 Chief Press Secretary to Oborevwori, Sir Festus Ahon, however, noted, “There is no permanent friend, no permanent enemy in politics. What is permanent is interest. 

“Today, we are one in one political family under the platform of the APC, led by His Excellency, Rt. Hon Sheriff Oborevwori, the Governor of Delta State.

“We are united because we want to build enduring legacies for our people. We want our people to feel the impact of democracy.

 ”Our decision to align with the government at the centre under the platform of the APC was for the collective interest of our people.

 ”While they criticized us in the past, we did not take offence. “We saw such criticism as a call for us to look inwards and improve on what we were doing for Deltans.

“We were not dissuaded by the criticisms, rather, we were strengthened by the criticisms because we are determined to govern and bring the dividends of democracy to the doorstep of every Deltan.

 ”So, today, we are in one political family, devoid of tendencies or faction, and we expect that more dividends will come to our people. We will build enduring legacy projects for our people”. 

[Vanguard]

Instead of dissipating energy on how to turn Nigeria into a one-party state, politicians have been told to focus attention on arresting the worsening poverty among Nigerians.

 

They were also advised to put their energy into containing the security challenges and other problems confronting the country.

These admonitions came from senior lawyers and political scholars who weighed in on the concern about Nigeria becoming a one-party state, noting that as much as it’s not illegal, such a scenario was not feasible.

They argued that the peculiarities and nature of our political class will make a one-party system untenable, adding that the Constitution guarantees freedom of association.

In exclusive interviews with LEADERSHIP Sunday, they, however, expressed concern about the quality of politics in Nigeria, adding that idealism, which ought to drive the political system, is dead.

 

They blamed the leadership of the National Assembly for condoning the level of defections witnessed at the legislature.

Leaders of opposition parties in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP) had accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of causing rifts within their folds in order to make Nigeria a one-party state.

This accusation followed mass defections from opposition parties into the ruling APC, largely on the grounds of internal rifts in their previous platforms.

Some media reports indicate that no fewer than 300 opposition figures had dumped the PDP and other platforms for the APC since 2023.

While most of the political migrations have taken place in the federal and state legislature, the collapse of PDP structures into APC in Delta State, led by Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, is the highest profile defection yet.

Akwa Ibom State Governor Umo Eno is expected to join the APC soon, and speculations of more high-profile defections to the ruling party are rife.

However, the APC national chairman, Dr Abdullahi Ganduje’s recent favourable disposition to a one-party state arrangement has earned him some criticism.

President Bola Tinubu, at a recent party event, said one party system was not suitable for a democracy; but in another breath he said more defectors were welcome to the ruling party, arguing that the freedom of association was guaranteed in the constitution.
Nigeria currently runs a multi-party system with 18 registered political parties.

One-Party State Legal But Difficult To Achieve – SANs, Others

Prominent Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Dr. Ahmed Raji, has said the possibility of Nigeria becoming a one-party state is not illegal but may be difficult to achieve.

Raji and other lawyers, who spoke with LEADERSHIP Sunday, said freedom of association for every citizen is guaranteed in the Constitution.

According to them, it is highly welcome if a one-party state brings development to the country.
Raji explained that if someone does not find anything attractive at a party, he is free to move to another one.

He said, “The freedom of association is a key fundamental right recognised under the 1999 constitution. If it is the desire of all Nigerians to be in one party in exercise of their right to associate, so be it.

“It is legal, and in cases where there is only one candidate contesting for a position, the constitution has prescribed a required threshold. Therefore, the scenario is legal and within the contemplation of the Constitution. But is it feasible in our circumstances?

“It may be a bit difficult to achieve in a country like ours having regards to her peculiarities and nature of our political class.

“People have the freedom of association. They can move to another party, if they don’t have anything attractive in other parties.

“The 1999 Constitution already anticipated it. Where you have one candidate, there is a number of votes you must get to be declared winner. It is within the right of the people to associate with any political party of their choice.”

Another senior advocate, Abdul Balogun, who agreed with Raji that Nigeria’s becoming a one-party state may be difficult to achieve, said the political elite should focus on addressing the abject poverty in the land.

“We can’t be talking about the country becoming a one-party state because there is no strong and credible opposition in place.

“Nigerians are crying and dying of hunger, the politicians are not bothered because all they care about is the country becoming a one-party state.”

Similarly, another lawyer, Barrister Oghenovo Otemu, said a one-party state is welcome if it brings about development in the country.

While he noted that defections by politicians do not make the country a one-party state, he said, “Nigeria is not practising a one-party state and even if we are practising a one-party state, it’s not a big deal. China is a one-party state.

“There are people who are in APC who are defecting to other parties. There are people who are in PDP who are also defecting to other parties, so the country is not being turned into a one-party state.”

He blamed Senate President Godswill Akpabio, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon Tajudeen Abbas and the leaderships of state assemblies for allowing defected lawmakers to remain in the National Assembly.

He said it was the duty of the leadership of federal and state assemblies to declare the seats of defected lawmakers vacant to fast-track the cases against the defectors in court.

“The way the law is couched, when a lawmaker defects, it is the duty of the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Speaker, State House of Assembly to declare the seats of such lawmakers vacant.

“Most of the defections are being made to the political party of the presiding officers responsible for declaring the seats vacant.

“If I’m defecting to your side in the National Assembly, for example, I don’t expect you to declare my seat vacant. It will not be politically correct to do so for the presiding officers.”

One-party State Would Require Legislation – Saliu

Meanwhile, the president of the Nigeria Political Scientists Association (NPSA), Prof. Hassan Saliu, has allayed the fear of Nigerians about the country drifting into a one-party state.
He said that a one-party state is a legal attainment, noting that there is no law in place yet to say every Nigerian should belong to the APC.

“If you recall in the past, when we had one-party state in Tanzania and all these places, they came through the legal process. And now there is no law before the National Assembly to say everybody must be in APC. But rather, we are seeing a tendency where one party is increasingly becoming dominant,” Saliu added.

Saliu said the politicians were defecting mainly for personal gains.

“The idealism behind politics, which is for development, is no longer fashionable in Nigeria. Every politician you see looks at his pocket. So, and since every business you put your money into, you expect some profits, therefore politicians keep on dancing around in order to satisfy their personal gain. There is no ideology propelling political activity in Nigeria.

Is there any difference between APC and PDP, or any difference between Labour Party and SDP? In terms of ideology, they seem to look alike.

“I was just reading a post where a member was saying that under the Second Republic, people knew what UPN stood for: free education and free health. NPN stood for housing for all and stuff like that. But now we don’t seem to have any of such tendencies. What you see is that a man can become a PDP man in the evening but tomorrow morning he’s in APC. There is no conversion process,” he said.

Nigeria too sophisticated for one-party rule – Pearse

Former lecturer at the University of Lagos and renowned public affairs analyst Dr Adetokunbo Pearse has described Nigeria’s political system as too sophisticated and dynamic for a one-party system.

The political scientist told LEADERSHIP Sunday that, ‘’All the pronouncements and the shenanigans and the tricks being played by President Bola Tinubu is intended to lead to one-party state; that is what he wants. However, the PDP is a formidable political party[L1] ; that it is not equal to APC does not mean the party is not strong.

‘’If you look at the National Assembly spread, the party has about 40 per cent and APC has about 58 per cent. In the House of Reps where APC has about 198 members, PDP has 108 members; unfortunately, Labour party has only 28 members and New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) has one or two members, that is why people think APC is so dominant.”

He said while APC is a strong political party right now, PDP is a very close second and Labour Party a distant third.

Pearse added that while PDP governors and elected members are joining APC, its members are not.

He cited a recent video where former Delta State governor, Senator Patrick Okowa, was booed by his people for joining the APC.

‘’They told Okowa they were not going with him, and they are going to stay in the PDP, and told him if he wants to join APC he should go alone. Some governors and individuals are going to APC, it does not mean members of the PDP are going into APC, let’s get that straight.”

He further said the coalition will also cause defections into their fold when they evolve into a political party.

‘’We can never have a one-party system; this is a very dynamic country, with a lot of people, a lot of contacts, nationally, internationally, a lot of intelligentsia. 2027 is a different ball game.”

He noted that a one-party system will lead to outright dictatorship and “a monopoly, where you don’t have a voice to voice your opinion.”

‘’In every direction it kills the country, that is why we don’t want it. Don’t forget this is a multi-ethnic, multi religious, multi-cultural nation of people. For us to have one party, it is going to lead to disaster,” he said.

One-party system fear not real – Dr Tavershima

Weighing in on the subject, a lecturer in the department of political science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe State, Dr Terna Vincent Tavershima, has stated that the fear of one-party rule is not real.

He said it’s a creation of people who are not comfortable with the movement of political stalwarts from their parties to the major parties.

“We practise a multi-party system in this country and the constitution guarantees everybody the freedom of association and freedom of expression. To that extent, people are allowed to pitch tents with political parties that they feel will guarantee their interests at a material time. The fear of a one-party state is not tenable in Nigeria,” he said.

According to him, for a one-party rule to manifest, it has to be the only registered party like in China, where only one party was formally registered and recognised by the law of a country.

“What people are doing now is defecting to the APC to secure a second term in office, in the case of the governors, senators and House of Representatives members, who feel threatened that they might not get the ticket of their political parties that are housing them for now.”

Ruling party should brace for challenges – Dr Okeke

A political science lecturer at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Dr Christian Okeke, also agreed that a one-party state is not feasible in such a complex and heterogeneous entity as Nigeria.

He, however, said there is nothing extraordinary in the present polity that the country has not passed through before.

“My belief is that the next general election will be shaped ultimately and remarkably by several factors that will give the ruling party some sleepless nights regardless of any mass exodus into it.

“To that extent, the goodwill it seems to be enjoying at the moment is something that it should not rejoice over but reflect upon.”

He nonetheless said the most important factor needed in deciding who wins or loses in 2027 is the electoral commission’s neutrality.

“The National Assembly must step in with stringent laws that criminalise electoral offences and guarantee the desired future for our elections. The commission must be forced to become a credible umpire,” Okeke said.

2027 politics has killed governance – Dr Garuba

Political scientist, Dr Dauda Garuba, considers the mass defections as the beginning of some of the dynamics towards the 2027 general election.

Garuba, who is also the director, Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD, West Africa), however said he was concerned that the politics of 2027 started too early and had relegated governance to the background.

“For me, this is the very earliest time since the return of democracy that people started talking of a second term just after one year. Even as I talk, it’s not up to two years of the present administration. I am worried about it due to the fact that governance is not on the table anymore, let alone the citizens in whose interest governance should work,” he said.

Saraki’s reconciliation team races to halt PDP’s bleeding

Meanwhile, the reconciliation committee led by former Senate President Abubakar Bukola Saraki is racing against time to stop the haemorrhaging of PDP members. This comes as the party prepares for the much anticipated National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting on Tuesday.

Saraki team met with Enugu State Governor Peter Mbah on Friday.

The Saraki committee was set up at an expanded meeting of PDP governors, their predecessors, and the party leadership to reconcile clashing interests over the national secretary position so that the party’s much-elusive National Executive Committee (NEC) could hold next Tuesday.

The deputy national secretary, Setonji was asked to act as national secretary, pending the resolution of the matter.

The South East zone had threatened to dump the party if its nominee for the contentious national secretary position was not accepted by the party.

The threat followed insinuations that the Saraki committee had backed the return of Senator Samuel Anyanwu as PDP national secretary, while he was rejected by the PDP leaders in the South East.

Last week, the PDP South East caucus resubmitted Hon Sunday Ude-Okoye’s name for the position, which was zoned to the region.

It was learnt that Saraki’s visit to Governor Mbah was to assuage the concern of South East leaders that the committee had already taken a position which favours Anyanwu’s return.

However, a party source confided in LEADERSHIP Sunday that the intervention of Saraki’s team “might be instrumental to the holding of NEC but not ultimately resolving the large crisis of confidence within the party which revolves around zoning, the next leadership of party, and the expulsion of anti-party elements within its fold.”

Meanwhile, Anyanwu, who enjoys the backing of a bloc loyal to the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister, Nyesom Wike, has insisted he remains the PDP national secretary.

LEADERSHIP Sunday learnt that some of his supporters are gearing up to storm the NEC meeting venue, Wadata Plaza, to protest for Anyanwu to be recognised as national secretary.

I’m Not APC Proxy – Damagum

Meanwhile, the acting national chairman of the PDP, Ambassador Iliya Damagum, has dismissed allegations that he is an APC stooge.

Earlier in the year, critics alleged that Damagum secretly met with President Tinubu in London, framing a spin that he failed to address the internal crisis within PDP, which led to its weakened state as a leading opposition ahead of 2027.

But in an interview with BBC Hausa Service aired on Saturday and monitored by our correspondent in Bauchi, Damagum said, “I will never forgive those accusing me of working for APC. I never held a meeting with President Tinubu.”

He emphasised his unflinching loyalty and commitment to the PDP.

“I joined PDP in 1999. I have never defected to any political party since then. If I want to join the APC, I would have done that during Buhari’s tenure but I didn’t,” he insisted.

Commenting on the allegation that his close cordial relationship with FCT minister, Nyesom Wike, reflects his incompetence to lead the party, Damagum said, “They know and have interacted with Wike before I do.”

“My only crime is that I refused to allow his opponents within the party to antagonise him.”

The acting national chairman expressed concern over the rate of defection from the PDP, insisting that the party leadership is working to mend the divisions within its ranks and halt more members from dumping the party.

 [Leadership]

Three years after the deadly assault on St. Francis Catholic Church in Owo, Ondo State, bandits have issued a fresh threat to launch another attack on the church.

 

The anonymous assailants, in a letter addressed to the church, vowed to carry out a strike “soon”, with no specific timeline stipulated.

 

With the threat, tension has gripped the ancient community, which is still reeling from the June 5, 2022, Pentecost Sunday attack, where gunmen stormed the church, killing 41 worshippers and injuring 69 others.

 

The tragic incident, one of Nigeria’s deadliest acts of violence against a religious institution, left scars on Owo’s residents, many of whom remain fearful amid persistent insecurity in parts of the state and country.

 

Concerned about the development, the community led by its traditional ruler, the Olowo of Owo, Oba Ajibade Ogunoye , convened a security summit to address the rising insecurity in the area.

 

According to the summit’s publicity secretary, Mr Bosun Oladimeji, the maiden edition of the Owo Security Summit, themed “Securing Owo and its Environs: Strategies for Community Safety and Resilience”, will be held next week.

 

Oladimeji maintained that the summit will raise awareness about community security, foster cooperation between residents and law enforcement, reduce crime, and propose sustainable security initiatives with the key objective to establish a Security Trust Fund to support long-term efforts.

The South-East caucus of the Peoples Democratic Party has given the former Senate President Bukola Saraki-led reconciliation panel a list of conditions that will stop the defections of its leaders and members from the party.

 

Sunday PUNCH gathered that this happened during the closed-door meeting between the Enugu State Governor, Peter Mbah, and the Saraki panel on Friday at the Enugu State Government House. Mbah is the leader of the party in the zone.

 

The caucus reportedly insisted that the National Youth Leader, Sunday Ude-Okoye, must be retained as the party’s National Secretary.

 

The group also said that the party would lose its grip on the South-East if the leadership failed to address the concerns of stakeholders from the zone.

 

Sunday PUNCH gathered that the meeting was part of efforts to stem the tide of defections rocking the party, especially from the South-South and South-East.

 

Saraki, who addressed journalists after the meeting, had said, “Frankly, we had a very useful discussion. We are going away with some of the suggestions that we have here and hopefully will work on that.”

 

Insiders at the meeting confided in our correspondents that Mbah lamented that the zone had not been treated fairly in party affairs.

 

According to a source, the governor complained that the South-East, which had for years been a strong pillar of support for the party, was not respected.

 

He said, “The governor told the panel that, as a condition to sustain the dominance of the party in the region, the PDP must retain Ude-Okoye as the party’s National Secretary instead of Senator Samuel Anyanwu.

 

“He lamented that the zone had not been given due recognition in party affairs. The governor reminded the panel that the South-East, led by the then Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, stood firm and brought back PDP on a strong footing when the party had a crisis in 2015. The governor told the panel that the PDP leadership must give the South-East a prominent role in the party.”

 

Recall that the South-East PDP leaders had on May 14 issued a communique in which they threatened to exit the party if Udeh-Okoye was not retained as National Secretary.

 

Signed by the Zonal Chairman, Chief Ali Odefa, the communique partly read, “The South-East has consistently served as a stronghold of the PDP from inception. In its near three-decade existence, we have given our loyalty and all to the party.

 

“Therefore, we hope that this time around, the position of the South-East PDP regarding the office of the National Secretary is accorded the honour and immediacy it deserves.

 

“However, in the event that our position is not promptly implemented by the party, the South-East PDP, as a family, will be compelled to reconsider our relationship with the PDP going forward.”

 

Party crisis

 

The PDP has been embroiled in a protracted leadership crisis centred on the position of National Secretary, involving Anyanwu and Udeh-Okoye.

 

The crisis began when Anyanwu, who was elected as the PDP National Secretary in 2021, contested the Imo State gubernatorial election under the party in 2023.

 

His participation in the election led to internal disputes within the party, with some members arguing that his candidacy effectively vacated his position as the party’s scribe. 

 

Following the controversy, the National Executive Committee of the party asked the South-East, where Anyanwu hails from, to name his replacement.

 

The South-East subsequently nominated Udeh-Okoye as the new PDP scribe, a development that resulted in a legal battle.

 

Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, tensions persist within the PDP, as the party’s governors nominated the Deputy National Secretary, Setonji Koshoedo, as the acting National Secretary.

 

 

 

NEC meeting

 

Meanwhile, Sunday PUNCH has exclusively gathered that the disputed position of National Secretary, zonal congresses, and the upcoming elective national convention will top the agenda at the PDP’s 99th National Executive Committee meeting, scheduled for Tuesday, May 27, at the party’s headquarters in Abuja.

 

A reliable source within the PDP National Working Committee, who spoke on condition of anonymity, revealed that various committees were also expected to present progress reports.

 

The PDP National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, confirmed that the NEC meeting would address and resolve all outstanding issues.

 

The reliable source within the NWC confirmed that the party leadership was making significant efforts to ensure the meeting takes place on Tuesday.

 

 

He said, “The more the NEC meeting is postponed, the deeper the crisis within the party becomes. That’s why the current National Working Committee, led by Acting National Chairman Umar Damagum, is making every effort to ensure the meeting holds as scheduled on May 27.

 

“A lot of work is going on behind the scenes, though it may not be visible to the public. But this time, the NEC meeting will definitely take place.”

 

The source acknowledged that the meeting was expected to be tense due to the number of critical issues on the agenda.

 

However, there is optimism that it will end well and mark a turning point for the PDP.

 

“We will consider the Governors’ Forum’s recommendation for an early convention in August. The NEC will also receive reports from several committees, including the Disciplinary Panel and the Reconciliation Committee.

 

“In addition, discussions will cover the zonal congresses and the long-disputed position of National Secretary, which we expect the NEC to finally resolve. All pending matters affecting the party will be deliberated on, and appropriate resolutions will be made.”

 

The National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, confirmed to Sunday PUNCH that the NEC meeting will hold on May 27 as planned, with all arrangements in place to address the National Secretary dispute and other pending issues.

 

He said, “NEC is going to hold as scheduled on May 27. We are moving ahead with our NEC.

 

“Politics is all about interest. But the PDP has internal mechanisms with the capacity to reconcile all these issues. And that is why all issues about the National Secretary are going to NEC. The NEC will sort it out.

 

“Also, there will be several meetings before the NEC. The National Working Committee will meet with the Board of Trustees, Governors Forum, and there will be a National Caucus meeting, among others. There will be a caucus on May 26.”

The 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, has said the 2027 general elections may be his final shot at the presidency.

 

Obi, who confirmed he would contest in 2027 on the LP’s platform, hinted at a possible exit from active politics after that.

 

He spoke in a seven-minute, 16-second video clip that went viral on the party’s WhatsApp platform during an informal address to young Nigerians.

 

The former Anambra State governor noted that he would be 65 in 2027 and might not be willing to pursue public office beyond that age.

 

“I believe we should have a retirement age for politicians. By 2027, I will be 65. If the presidency goes back to the North in 2031, it may not return to the South until 2039 — by then, I will be 77. I wouldn’t want to run for office at that age. It would make a mess of everything,” he said.

 

Despite suggesting that he may not return to the ballot beyond 2027, Obi assured his audience of continued support for young Nigerians who are serious about national transformation.

 

“Even if I’m not contesting, I will always support those of you who are committed to real change, with whatever resources I can provide,” he stated.

 

Although Sunday PUNCH could not verify when the video was recorded, Obi’s media aide, Umar Ibrahim, confirmed it was recent. 

 

“It’s a recent video, around last week, yes. But I can’t remember the exact day that it held,” Ibrahim said.

 

Addressing internal crises in opposition parties, Obi blamed the ruling government for fuelling the turmoil in both the LP and Peoples Democratic Party.

 

“What is happening in the Labour Party and the PDP is caused by the government. Quote me anywhere,” he declared, adding that interference in party affairs was a calculated effort to weaken the opposition.

 

He recalled how former President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua once intervened in a similar situation to ensure internal stability within political parties.

 

Obi said, “Back then, I went to President Yar’Adua. He called the INEC Chairman, Prof. Maurice Iwu, and said he didn’t want any issues in any political party. The problems were fixed. But today, every party is facing one crisis or another — and it is deliberate.”

 

He stated Nigeria’s democracy couldn’t thrive without strong opposition parties, expressing his determination to fix such structural challenges if elected.

 

 

The former Anambra governor also urged Nigerians to take personal responsibility for defending the integrity of their votes, warning that any meaningful reform would be met with resistance from those benefitting from the current system.

A former House of Representatives candidate for Ijesa South Federal Constituency in Osun State, Gideon Aloba, has called for a strategic alliance and genuine power-sharing arrangement between former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and ex-Anambra State governor, Peter Obi ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

 

In a statement shared with Sunday PUNCH, Aloba said only a united front between the opposition leaders could unseat President Bola Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress.

 

“To defeat Tinubu in 2027, there must be a handshake between Atiku and Obi. One of them must be ready to shelve personal ambition and offer strategic support,” he said.

 

Aloba called for a coalition modelled after the 2010 UK Conservative–Liberal Democrat government, where clear roles and responsibilities were outlined in a formal agreement.

 

He warned that without a binding framework, any merger could collapse under political pressure. 

 

The LP chieftain said, “To effectively manage the merger and protect the interests of both parties, a bipartisan coalition agreement must be signed. This document should clearly outline the roles, responsibilities, and oversight mechanisms for each side.

 

“The coalition should not be a mere president-and-spare-tyre arrangement. It must reflect true power-sharing where, for instance, one leader manages the economy and the other handles security and anti-corruption.

 

“The merger is not only inevitable; it is necessary. Though such alliances are always delicate, especially in Nigeria’s political space, a well-negotiated, clearly documented, and mutually respected agreement remains the best possible safeguard for the success of both parties, and more importantly, for the future of Nigeria.”

 

He stressed that managing ticket dynamics would be crucial in maintaining the support base of both parties, urging a display of political maturity and national interest above personal ambition.