THE Dr SOWUNMI OLABODE (aka Docky Show)

"... it was about 9:30 pm along the Jebba- Mokwa road. I was going on about 160 KPH when I heard a sound of something that hit my windscreen." I reversed the car and stopped.

When I came out It was pitch dark and all I could hear were cricket sounds. On searching, I discovered it was a bird. I kicked it off the road and got back in the car"

That was a narrative by my dad to some friends over drinks. It reflected his true spirit - He was intrepid and bold.

Born to Justice Olabode Sowunmi and Mrs Victoria Sowunmi-Idowu on Dec 30 1942; my dad had his fair share of challenges but left incredible memories for us. He had dogged determination and a unique legacy of integrity. By example, he showed to all of us that a man never need compromise for money.

It is to his eternal credit that In my life, I have NEVER known my dad to shift a position for money or related pecuniary gains no matter how small the issue. He thought me and my siblings that integrity is being true to what you are convinced is right and not what people consider right.

Like Prof Wole Soyinka (who was an acquaintance of his) said, "The man dies who refuses to stand up to tyranny". My dad believed that the spirit on integrity from standing on a conviction makes a man's destiny to open up in strange ways.

In the 60s he was a footballer who represented Lagos state in the Junior Academicals team. In the 70s he was engaged as manager in training with Unilever (then Lever Brothers) along with Chief Rufus Giwa and Chief Jubril Martins-Kuye. In the 80s he was part of President Shagari's Green Revolution committee. Later on he was consultant to the UN's Food and Agricultural Organisation. In the 1990s he served on the board of Western Livestock (one Oodua group of companies). He also lectured at the United Nations University and the Ogun State University, Ago Iwoye.

Dr Sowunmi was a man of many gifts and many faults. It you focus on his faults, you could not benefit from his gifting. However those who were his friends were incredible for their loyalty. When I met Chief Martins-Kuye for the first time, he had his driver come to the entrance of his estate to lead me as I drove to his house and when I entered, he held me by the hand to his inner living room. "You are Budi Show's child?" ..was his first statement to me. They truly valued their relationship.

Two weeks ago he said he was to visit Europe with his sisters for a cruise. My daughters managed to extract a promise of a visit to the zoo from him. He traveled 4 days ago. He passed on to glory in his hotel room in Venice. When my wife informed the girls that grandpa had gone to be with the Lord, the younger one said. So who is going to take us to the Zoo now? I guess different strokes for different folks. I heard searched only to discover that I had no pictures of my dad on my phone.

Two years ago ago on a Sunday afternoon, our mai guard (security guard) in Kano called his line from nowhere after over 30 years. Why? He was handing over his daughter daughter in marriage in his compound in Sokoto on that day. He wanted my dad to know he was the one the inspired and motivated him to acquire some education. i remembered him faintly as Sumiala.

My dad touched the lives of everyone connected with him. He was a gifted writer and communicator and even in his 70s he was an intellectual. Sir, we salute your legacy. Daddy, rest in the lord till we meet to part no more.

“DR.ODOH BERNARD IFEANYI IS NOT AND HAS NEVER BEEN A STAFF OF THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY GUSAU” – BEING TEXT OF A PRESS CONFERENCE ADDRESSED BY THE VICE CHANCHELLOR, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY GUSAU, PROFESSOR MU’AZU ABUBAKAR GUSAU ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2024

Gentlemen of the Press

It is my pleasure to welcome you to this press Conference.

Introduction

In the last two weeks, both the mainstream and new media in Nigeria have been awash with screaming headlines about the controversy surrounding the appointment of Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi as the Vice Chancellor of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State by the Governing Council of the University.  Part of the issues that has generated serious attention is the misleading and unfounded claim by Dr. Odoh that he was offered a tenure appointment and confirmed as a Professor by the Federal University, Gusau. 

Arising from the spurious claim, the Federal University Gusau, has been inundated with enquiries about the true status of Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi regarding: (a) his appointment as a tenured Professor in the Department of Geology; (b) grant of leave of absence and, (c) confirmation of appointment as a substantive professor by the Governing Council of the University.

In response to the public enquiry, the University management, after a thorough internal scrutiny, issued a disclaimer to the effect that Dr. Odoh was neither employed by the University nor appointed as a professor. However, despite the disclaimer, Dr. Odoh has been unrelenting, parading documents purportedly issued by the University as proof of his non-existent employment by the institution.  

The widely circulated misinformation by Dr. Odoh has no doubt, raised serious concerns about the credibility and reputation of the Federal University, Gusau. Consequently, the University Management has decided to go public, to tell its own side of the story to stem further misinformation on the issue. 

The University Management, therefore, wishes to clarify as follows:

(a)           That appointment of staff, both academic and non-teaching, by the Federal University Gusau, is done based on laid down guidelines duly approved by the University’s Governing Council;

(b)          That part of the guidelines is that when an individual applies for employment, after vacancies are declared, the University’s registry scrutinizes such application upon which, if found to have met employment requirements, such an applicant, alongside others, is shortlisted and invited for interview;

(c)           That upon successful interview, such an applicant is issued an appointment letter, containing the terms and conditions of his appointment. One of such conditions is a written acceptance of the offer of appointment. Thereafter, the applicant proceeds to document his engagement, upon which he is posted to the relevant unit of the University to assume duty  as a staff;

(d)          In the case of Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi, the University notes as follows:

(i)                     That he did not submit any letter of acceptance of offer of appointment,

(ii)                   That he did not undergo the statutory documentation,

(iii)                  That even though Dr. Odoh was engaged as a Visiting  linkage staff in the Department of Geology of the University, and dubiously enrolled into the institution’s payroll from July 2014 to August 2015,  he neither assumed duty nor taught any course since the inception of the Department in the 2014/2015 academic session. The collection of salary  for job not done, amounts to an illegality and a breach of extant rules;

(iv)                  That he was not at any point in time, appointed as the pioneer Head of Department of Geology of the University, contrary to such unfounded claim, and,

(v)                    That there is no personal file related to the appointment of Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi in the custody of the University.

(e)          Meanwhile, the so-called letters of offer of tenure of appointment as Professor and confirmation of promotion to the post of Professor, dated 30th April 2015 and 12th November 2015, being paraded by Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi and purported to be certified true copies hurriedly endorsed by Ibrahim Bawa Kaura, former Registrar of the Federal University,  dated November 8, 2024, six solid years after the latter left the services of the Federal University Gusau, are products of administrative fraud orchestrated by  Dr. Odoh, working in cahoots with the former Vice Chancellor of the University and the Registrar.

(f)           For the sake of emphasis, assessment of candidates for professorial appointment, just as it is the case with all academic staff promotions, is procedural and begins from the Departmental Appointments and Promotions Committee (DA&PC) through the Faculty Appointments and Promotions Committee (FA&PC) to the Senior Staff Establishments Committee (SSEC). It is only after successfully going through these stages that a candidate’s paper are packaged and sent out to three external assessors. In the case of Dr. Odoh, no such procedure was followed as there is no record to that effect in the University. 

Even if for the sake of argument, we concede that Dr. Odoh’s papers were sent out, it is almost near impossible for the three assessors to turn in their reports between April 30th 2015 and November 12th 2015, when he procured the questionable promotion to the rank of professor. As a matter of fact, we have it on good authority that the first Governing Council rejected the former Vice Chancellor’s request for the ratification of Dr. Odoh’s dubious promotion.

 Furthermore, shortly after being allegedly offered appointment, Dr. Odoh proceeded on leave of absence, a privilege that can only be extended to a confirmed staff of the University after the statutory probation period.

(g)           What is apparent from the foregoing, is that everything about Dr. Odoh’s   purported offer of appointment as tenure staff and confirmation of promotion as professor is shady, fraudulent, utterly devoid of due process and smacks of illegality as there is no evidence of official documentation with regards to his controversial employment as a staff of the Federal University Gusau. 

The whole charade was packaged and executed by the former Vice Chancellor and the former Registrar, without recourse to extant rules and due process for reasons not known to law and commonsense.

Further proof of the desperation to perpetuate such illegality is the   impersonation and usurpation of the duties of the current Registrar of the University by the former Registrar, Ibrahim Bawa Kaura, who procured a fake stamp to certify Dr. Odoh’s equally fake documents as true copies on November 8, 2024, six years after his disengagement from the University.  

  Conclusion

In conclusion, the Management of the Federal University Gusau, wishes to state in unequivocal terms that from available records, Dr. Odoh Bernard Ifeanyi is not and has never been a tenure staff of the University, let alone being confirmed as a Professor by the institution. Whatever claim to the contrary by Dr. Odoh is nothing but the antics of a drowning man who is hell-bent on using the good name of the Federal University Gusau, to give vent to his desperate ambition to become the Vice Chancellor of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, through subterfuge. 

Thank you.

In recent times, Nigeria has witnessed a curious shift in the culture of charity. Rather than the wealthy focusing their philanthropic efforts on those in dire need, we increasingly see acts of "generosity" directed at their fellow elites, entertainers, politicians, and other high-profile individuals who are far from destitute. What once might have been considered benevolence now often appears as a calculated performance, a spectacle crafted for attention, and a glaring contradiction to the very essence of charity.  

In its truest sense, charity is an act of giving with the intent to uplift the underprivileged. It seeks to bridge the gap between the haves and the have-nots, a gesture of kindness that addresses pressing societal inequalities. However, recent events in Nigeria paint a different picture. 

Consider the viral episodes where celebrities gift luxury cars, expensive watches, or cash to their equally wealthy peers. For instance, a popular Nigerian singer recently surprised another celebrity with a N100 million. Prior to the foregoing case, he was among other celebrities who contributed more than N60 million for a controversial celebrity who was caught in the web of Nigeria’s law, sparking widespread applause on social media. While such gestures might be celebrated within their circles, they raise a fundamental question: How does this help the struggling masses who can barely afford the next meal?  

The political class is not left out. Many governors and public officials have taken to awarding lavish gifts to wealthy individuals during public events. At a time when ordinary Nigerians face skyrocketing inflation, unemployment, and economic despair, these ostentatious displays of "charity" seem tone-deaf.  

The evolution of social media has exacerbated this trend. Platforms like Instagram and Twitter have become stages for the wealthy to showcase their generosity, not to the underprivileged, but to their equally affluent friends. Each gift is carefully documented, shared, and hyped online, with fans applauding the magnanimity of their idols.  

But is it truly charity if it comes with a spectacle? The essence of giving lies in humility and the genuine desire to make a difference. When acts of giving are performed for public applause or to sustain a carefully curated image of affluence and generosity, they lose their authenticity.  

Nigeria is currently grappling with one of its most challenging economic periods. It is no more news that Nigeria in a World Bank report was said to have over 133 million Nigerians living in multidimensional poverty. Hunger, lack of access to healthcare, poor education, and unemployment are everyday realities for many. Yet, these pressing issues seldom attract the attention of the wealthy when they choose to "give."  

For instance, the billions of naira that could transform lives in rural areas are instead spent on lavish birthday parties, with luxury hampers handed out to fellow elites as party favors. Imagine the impact if just a fraction of those funds were directed toward building schools, funding healthcare, or setting up skill acquisition centers in underserved communities.  

Philanthropy, when done right, has the power to transform societies. A shining example are the works of Aliko Dangote, Theophilus Danjuma, Tony Elumelu, Jim Ovia and Folorunso Alakija  Also philanthropists like Mike Adenuga, Abdul Samad Rabiu, Emeka Offor, Femi Otedola and Mohammed Indimi have done much in terms of charity to be applauded and recognized in a special way.

Contrast the foregoing with the trend today, where charity is no longer about impact but impression. The wealthy must be reminded that their giving should align with the needs of society. What use is a multimillion-naira car to a celebrity already driving a fleet of luxury vehicles when thousands in their community cannot afford basic transportation?  

The Nigerian public, too, bears some responsibility for perpetuating this trend. By celebrating these ostentatious displays, society inadvertently encourages the wealthy to continue this cycle of misplaced charity. The applause should go to those who build homes for the homeless, sponsor education for the underprivileged, and create opportunities for economic empowerment.  

Public figures like Tony Elumelu and Aliko Dangote, who have established foundations to address critical societal issues, offer examples of meaningful philanthropy. While their efforts may not garner as much social media clout as gifting a Rolex to a celebrity, they leave an indelible mark on society.  

The fixation on public displays of wealth masquerading as charity reveals a deeper issue within Nigeria's elite culture: a disconnect from the realities of the common man. In a nation where the majority struggle to survive, these acts of self-serving "generosity" are not just insensitive; they are a betrayal of the social contract that should bind all Nigerians.  

True charity is not about elevating one's social status or winning applause. It is about uplifting the downtrodden, addressing societal inequities, and building a more inclusive future. Anything short of this is merely an act of showoff, an exercise in vanity masquerading as virtue.  

The solution lies in redefining what it means to give. Nigerian elites must understand that the greatest impact comes from targeting their resources where they are most needed. Initiatives like creating job opportunities, improving access to education, and investing in healthcare infrastructure have a far-reaching and sustainable impact on society.  

Civil society, religious institutions, and media must also play their part in reshaping the narrative. The culture of glorifying empty displays of wealth should be replaced with one that celebrates impactful giving.  

In fact, it is imperative for the government to incentivize genuine philanthropic efforts. Tax breaks for donations to credible charities, public acknowledgment of impactful projects, and collaborations with the private sector can encourage more meaningful contributions.  

As Nigeria grapples with its many challenges, the role of the wealthy in shaping a better future cannot be overstated. However, that future will not be built through spectacles of gifting among the affluent. True charity lies in uplifting the poor, empowering the powerless, and addressing the pressing needs of society. Anything less is not an act of charity but a carefully staged performance, designed to impress, not to impact.  

The question remains: Will Nigeria’s wealthy elite rise to the occasion and redefine their giving culture, or will they continue to squander opportunities to make a real difference? For the sake of the millions living in poverty, one hopes they choose the former.  

 President-elect Donald Trump has tapped former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as his choice for U.S. attorney general following Matt Gaetz’s withdrawal of his nomination.

Trump announced late Thursday that he would nominate Bondi to become the nation’s top law-enforcement officer, citing her work as a prosecutor.

“Pam was a prosecutor for nearly 20 years, where she was very tough on Violent Criminals, and made the streets safe for Florida Families,” he said in a statement. “Then, as Florida’s first female Attorney General, she worked to stop the trafficking of deadly drugs, and reduce the tragedy of Fentanyl Overdose Deaths, which have destroyed many families across our Country.”

Bondi is likely to have an easier time winning Senate confirmation than Gaetz, who faced opposition from some Senate Republicans.

Bondi, 59, is a Trump ally who served as one of his defense attorneys during his first impeachment trial, when he was accused of abusing his power by withholding military aid from Ukraine to pressure Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce an investigation into a political rival, then-former Vice President Joe Biden. The Senate acquitted Trump of the charges.

Bondi also served on Trump's Opioid and Drug Abuse Commission during his first term and acted as a campaign surrogate during this year's presidential contest. She was among a group of Republicans who attended Trump's hush-money trial in New York earlier this year to show their support for him.

Bondi was Florida's attorney general for eight years, from 2011 to 2019. She was the first woman elected to the position.

The Justice Department has more than 100,000 workers covering a broad range of interests. The department prosecutes federal criminal laws through U.S attorneys offices and through its main headquarters, and brings civil lawsuits to enforce civil rights and antitrust laws. The department oversees agencies such as the FBI; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the U.S. Marshals Service and the Bureau of Prisons.

"For too long, the partisan Department of Justice has been weaponized against me and other Republicans - Not anymore," Trump said in his statement. "Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fighting Crime, and Making America Safe Again. I have known Pam for many years — She is smart and tough, and is an AMERICA FIRST Fighter, who will do a terrific job as Attorney General!"

Bondi is Trump's second choice for attorney general and the second Floridian has has tapped for the job.

Earlier Thursday, Gaetz, a former Florida congressman, withdrew his nomination amid continuing allegations of sexual misconduct.

The DOJ – which Gaetz would have led if he became attorney general – investigated allegations that he committed statutory rape by paying for sex with a 17-year-old girl and for her to travel with him across state lines. That probe was dropped without charges.

But the House Ethics Committee, a bipartisan panel equally divided between Democrats and Republicans, was also investigating those and other allegations and had planned to vote on whether to release a report on their findings just two days after Gaetz abruptly resigned his House seat last week.

Did Matt Gaetz resign from Congress?What to know after he backs out of Trump's AG role

A lawyer for two witnesses said his clients testified before the Ethics Committee about the allegations. One said she saw Gaetz allegedly under the influence of drugs and sexually abusing the 17-year-old, though she said she did not think Gaetz knew the girl's age.

Gaetz has denied the allegations. But he said he decided to withdraw his nomination because it had become a distraction for Trump's transition team.

[usatoday]

Nigeria’s judiciary is teetering on the brink of a catastrophic crisis, its credibility and independence hanging by a thread. For the first time in the nation’s history, two female judicial leaders—Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and President of the Court of Appeal Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem—are at the center of intense national and international scrutiny. Their perceived failure to shield the judiciary from political interference has cast a dark cloud over their leadership and placed the entire judicial system in jeopardy. With over 25 politically charged cases tied to Rivers State and the aggressive maneuvers of Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike, the integrity of Nigeria’s courts is precariously close to collapse.

The Looming Danger of Judicial Missteps

Rivers State has become the epicenter of a looming national crisis, its stability threatened by Wike’s relentless bid to maintain control at any cost. Masquerading as legal battles, these cases are part of a calculated strategy to destabilize his successor, Governor SiminalayiFubara, and reassert dominance over the political landscape of Rivers State.

This deluge of politically motivated cases, many filed outside Rivers State in Abuja courts, paints a troubling picture of judicial manipulation. Under Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, the judiciary is increasingly perceived as a willing accomplice in this power struggle, raising questions about its role as an impartial arbiter of justice.

Judges operating within this system must confront some hard truths: Why has one man, Nyesom Wike, managed to hijack judicial processes? Why are courts inundated with cases that appear more about political vendettas than the pursuit of justice? The judiciary, once regarded as the last hope of the common man, is dangerously close to being weaponized for political warfare.

The fallout from this judicial entanglement is not just a domestic embarrassment but a global concern. Nigeria’s judiciary, led by two of its most prominent female leaders, now stands accused of enabling a political scheme that threatens to erode public trust, destabilize Rivers State, and set a dangerous precedent for judicial complicity in political power plays. The stakes could not be higher, and the consequences of inaction are too dire to ignore.

A Judiciary Under Siege

Wike’s strategic moves—including constructing court buildings, hosting ceremonies, and providing housing for judges—have placed the judiciary in an ethically precarious position. These actions, though veiled in benevolence, carry the sinister undertone of creating indebtedness. Judges must remember their loyalty is to the constitution and the law, not to political actors or their extravagant gestures. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must break this cycle of entanglement and reclaim the judiciary’s dignity.

The Courts Are Not INEC: A Judiciary at Risk

The judiciary is not, and should never be, an extension of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Its mandate is to uphold the law impartially and serve as the cornerstone of justice and democracy. However, under the leadership of two women—Chief Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem—the judiciary’s credibility and independence are under serious threat. This perception has fostered a troubling erosion—of integrity, independence, and, most alarmingly, public trust.

While there are undoubtedly judges within the court system led by these two women who remain committed to delivering impartial justice, the overall atmosphere of the judiciary, especially in the eyes of Nigerians and the international community, has become deeply troubling and shaming. The institution once seen as the last hope of the common man is now mired in accusations of complicity in political gamesmanship.

How Have These Two Women Allowed This Decline?

The judiciary, once revered as a symbol of fairness and impartiality, now finds itself entangled in controversy. These two women, entrusted with safeguarding the independence of the courts, stand accused of failing to shield the judiciary from the clutches of political actors like Nyesom Wike. Wike’s calculated use of the courts to maintain dominance in Rivers State and undermine his successor has cast a long shadow over the judiciary’s ability to act independently.

This association—whether through attendance at politically charged events or rulings perceived as partisan—has only deepened suspicions about the judiciary’s neutrality. What was once an institution held in the highest regard is now viewed as a participant in political schemes rather than a bastion of justice.

A Call for the Two Women to Restore Judicial Integrity

For the judiciary to reclaim its lost integrity, these two women must take decisive action to draw a firm line between the courts and political interference. Justice Kekere-Ekun and Justice Dongban-Mensem must lead by example, steering the judiciary back to its role as an impartial and independent institution.

The world is watching, and Nigerians are demanding accountability. The failure of these two women to act decisively will not only tarnish their legacies but will also threaten the nation’s democratic institutions and further alienate an already disillusioned public. Justice must not only be done but be seen to be done, and it is their responsibility to ensure the judiciary rises above this troubling period to restore trust and confidence in the courts.

The Atmosphere of Judicial Compromise

The global and national perception of Nigeria’s judiciary is increasingly one of compromise. With over 25 politically motivated cases linked to Wike’s faction flooding the courts, the judicial system appears vulnerable to manipulation. Judges within this system are now faced with decisions that could either restore the public’s faith or deepen the narrative of judicial partiality. Yet, the visible entanglement of the judiciary’s leaders in politically charged events, coupled with rulings that seem to favor Wike’s faction, continues to erode its integrity.

This atmosphere of judicial compromise is not only shaming but also dangerous. It signals to the world that Nigeria’s judiciary is no longer above the fray, that it has been dragged into the messy and divisive politics of power. This perception damages the nation’s democratic standing and invites scrutiny from international observers who are closely watching these developments.

The Weight of Leadership

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem bear the heavy burden of safeguarding judicial independence, but they have failed woefully. Their reckless decision to attend political and celebratory events hosted by Nyesom Wike—whose cases could land in their courts—has not only shattered the judiciary’s credibility but cast a dark shadow over every judge under their leadership.

These two women have placed even the most honorable judges in a position of uncertainty, forcing good judges and magistrates to work within a judiciary increasingly seen as compromised. Former President Obasanjo’s scathing critique of a ‘captured judiciary’ is a damning reflection of their leadership. If they fail to change course, they will forever be remembered as the architects of Nigeria’s judicial collapse.

Nigerians and the international community are watching. The judiciary cannot afford to continue down this path of perceived compromise. Its leaders must act decisively to reaffirm the independence of the courts, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done. Anything less would be a betrayal of the judiciary’s sacred role in upholding the law and protecting democracy.

Rivers State: The Spark for National Unrest

The situation in Rivers State transcends political disputes; it is now a flashpoint for potential national chaos. If rulings from the appeals court or Supreme Court appear to favor Wike’s side, they will be seen as judicial complicity in his relentless pursuit of power. This perception could trigger unrest reminiscent of Nigeria’s darkest periods.

The controversial ruling barring Rivers State from receiving allocations exemplifies this growing public anger. This decision, widely criticized, is seen not as a punishment of the state government but of the citizens themselves. Such rulings deepen resentment, spark outrage, and fuel the narrative of a judiciary that has lost its way. The public will not blame Wike or President Tinubu for the resulting chaos—they will squarely blame these two female judicial leaders for failing to act decisively to protect the integrity of the courts.

A National Embarrassment

The conduct of the judiciary under Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem is rapidly becoming a national embarrassment. Their perceived complicity in politically charged events and rulings that favor Wike’s faction tarnishes the judiciary’s image. How have Nigeria’s most respected judicial offices become synonymous with partisanship and manipulation? How have they fallen so far from their sacred duty to be impartial arbiters of justice?

The world is watching, and Nigeria’s judiciary is now under a microscope. The consequences of inaction are dire—a collapse of public trust, the erosion of democratic values, and a potential descent into widespread unrest, beginning in Rivers State and spreading like wildfire.

A Call to Action

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must seize this moment to redefine their leadership and restore the judiciary’s integrity. They must draw a firm line between the judiciary and political actors like Wike. This is not a time for complacency or complicity; it is a time for courage. These leaders must reassert the judiciary’s foundational principles of impartiality and justice.

The judiciary must rise above the fray and demonstrate its independence. Nigeria cannot afford a judiciary that exacerbates division and unrest. Without decisive leadership, these two women risk cementing their legacies as architects of a judicial crisis that plunged the nation into chaos.

The courts are meant to deliver justice, not ignite conflict. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem must act swiftly and decisively to avert a national disaster. The nation is watching, the stakes could not be higher, and history will not be kind to those who fail to act.

John Egbeazien Oshodi

Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi, born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, is an American-based police and prison scientist, forensic/clinical psychologist, public policy psychologist, and legal psychologist. He’s a government advisor on forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA and the founder of the Dr. John Egbeazien Oshodi Foundation for Psychological Health. With a significant role in introducing forensic psychology to Nigeria through N.U.C. and Nasarawa State University, he’s also a former Secretary-General of the Nigeria Psychological Association. He’s taught at esteemed institutions like Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Nova Southeastern University, and more, and is currently an online faculty member at ISCOM University,  Weldios University and Walden University.

Chimamanda’s recent post on her X handle, @Ode_Luwa, offers a powerful and cautionary message for women in relationships. Her words, “Don’t ever make a mistake of disrespecting your MAN because you have some boys showing you attention. Respect is the BEST gift you can gift your man. MEN value RESPECT so much. You might be attractive for FUN ‘and’ not to be kept for Marriage,” serve as a poignant reminder of the role respect plays in sustaining healthy and meaningful relationships.

The post, although concise, carries layers of wisdom that can guide women navigating the complexities of love and partnership. It emphasizes that while physical attraction or fleeting attention might offer short-lived validation, respect is what cements a man’s commitment and builds a lasting bond.

In fact, respect in relationships goes beyond words; it is reflected in attitudes, actions, and the way partners treat each other during both good and challenging times. For many men, respect is not just a desired trait but an essential one. It communicates value, trust, and admiration, three pillars that keep the foundation of any relationship strong.

Chimamanda’s statement highlights an often overlooked truth: respect is not a one-off act but a continuous choice. It involves listening without judgment, valuing a partner’s contributions, and maintaining boundaries that honor the relationship.

In a society where fleeting attractions and distractions abound, the act of respecting one’s partner becomes even more significant. The temptation to seek validation from “boys” or external admirers may seem harmless at first but can have long-term consequences for trust and emotional intimacy.

Chimamanda’s reference to “some boys showing you attention” speaks to a common pitfall many women face in relationships, external validation. Attention from others can feel flattering, especially during moments when insecurities arise. However, it is crucial to distinguish between superficial compliments and genuine admiration.

While the former might boost ego, it often comes with no depth or commitment. “Boys,” as Chimamanda aptly puts it, may find a woman attractive for fun but not for the long haul. In contrast, a man who has chosen to invest in a relationship deserves respect and loyalty.

The pursuit of external validation can lead to a slippery slope. What starts as harmless flirtation may evolve into behaviors that undermine the trust and foundation of the relationship. Chimamanda’s cautionary words are a reminder to women to evaluate the worth of temporary attention versus the enduring value of respect within a committed partnership.

For men, respect often ranks as one of the most important elements of a fulfilling relationship. It goes beyond admiration and taps into a deep-seated need for recognition and support. Respect tells a man that his efforts, decisions, and contributions matter.

Disrespect, on the other hand, can manifest in subtle ways, sarcasm, belittling remarks, or dismissiveness, and over time, it can erode the bond between partners. Chimamanda’s post serves as a reminder to women to be mindful of their words and actions.

Respect is not about blind agreement but about finding ways to communicate disagreements constructively. It is about being a partner who uplifts rather than undermines, who supports rather than criticizes unnecessarily.

At this juncture, it suffices to opine that for women who wish to cultivate respect in their relationships, that there are a few practical steps inspired by Chimamanda’s wisdom:

First is that respectful communication involves listening as much as speaking. Avoid interrupting or dismissing your partner’s feelings, and choose your words carefully, especially during disagreements.

Second is appreciate his efforts. Acknowledge the little things your partner does for you. Whether it is providing support during tough times or handling responsibilities, showing appreciation reinforces his value in the relationship.

In a similar vein, one of the quickest ways to breed resentment is by comparing your partner to others. Focus on his unique qualities and strengths rather than dwelling on perceived shortcomings.

Also, set boundaries with others. This is as external attention can sometimes blur boundaries. Therefore, ensure that your interactions with others do not compromise the trust and respect within your relationship.

Again, encourage his growth. This is as respect also involves supporting your partner’s goals and aspirations. Be his cheerleader, encouraging him to achieve his best without feeling threatened by his success.

Without a doubt, there are consequences of disrespect of one’s husband. Disrespect can take a toll on a relationship in ways that are both immediate and long-lasting. When a man feels undervalued or belittled, it can lead to emotional withdrawal. Over time, this emotional distance can create a rift that becomes increasingly difficult to mend.

Chimamanda’s advice serves as a warning against taking a partner’s commitment for granted. While physical attraction or other superficial qualities might catch someone’s eye, it is respect that ensures longevity in a relationship.

The proverb “A stitch in time saves nine” perfectly encapsulates the essence of Chimamanda’s post. It speaks to the importance of addressing issues early before they escalate. In relationships, this means being proactive about recognizing and rectifying behaviors that might come across as disrespectful.

Catching yourself in moments of irritation or frustration can prevent you from saying or doing things you might regret. It’s about prioritizing the relationship over ego and choosing to act in ways that strengthen rather than weaken the bond you share with your partner.

Without any scintilla of hyperbole, Chimamanda’s post is not just advice; it is a challenge to women to reflect on their attitudes and behaviors in relationships. It calls for intentionality in treating their partners with the respect they deserve, regardless of external distractions or fleeting temptations.

This challenge also extends to redefining what respect looks like in modern relationships. It is about balancing independence with partnership, ensuring that neither partner feels diminished in the process.

Chimamanda’s words serve as a timeless reminder of the power of respect in relationships. In a world where distractions are plentiful, choosing to respect and honor your partner is a testament to the depth of your commitment.

Let her caution inspire women to evaluate their priorities and focus on what truly matters. A respectful partnership not only nurtures love but also lays the groundwork for a fulfilling and enduring relationship.

In the end, Chimamanda’s wisdom reminds us that respect is not just a gift to your partner; it is a gift to yourself, a reflection of your values, intentions, and the kind of love you wish to cultivate. So, let us take her advice to heart and ensure that respect remains at the forefront of our relationships. A stitch in time does not just save nine; it saves love, trust, and the promise of a brighter future together.

In the ever-evolving Nigerian music industry, where diverse sounds and personalities converge, some artists manage to capture attention with their audacity and raw talent. One such figure is Habeeb Okikiola, better known as “Portable”. Known for his vibrant energy and unapologetic authenticity, Portable has once again stirred the conversation by expressing his desire to collaborate with Afrobeats superstar Tiwa Savage. This move underscores his confidence, artistic ambition, and a deep-seated belief in his abilities, despite the controversies and criticisms that often surround him.

Portable’s rise to fame has been anything but conventional. From humble beginnings in Sango Ota, Ogun State, his breakthrough came with the viral hit “Zazoo Zeh”, featuring Olamide and Poco Lee. This song not only catapulted him into the limelight but also showcased his unique ability to capture the pulse of the streets.

Unlike many artists who conform to industry norms, Portable thrives on being unconventional. His music is a raw reflection of his roots, blending street slang with energetic beats to create anthems that resonate deeply with everyday Nigerians. Tracks like “Azaman”, “Expensive OG”, and “Zazoo Zeh” reveal an artist who understands his audience and delivers music that mirrors their struggles and triumphs.

It is this authenticity that sets Portable apart. While some see him as a chaotic personality, his loyal fanbase views him as a voice for the underrepresented, a griot chronicling the realities of life in the trenches.

Given his move, not a few fans of the Afrobeats diva, may have asked, “Why Tiwa Savage?” The answer to the foregoing cannot be farfetched as it is no doubt a strategic and creative choice.  This is as Tiwa Savage is considered to be an icon in her own right. Dubbed the “Queen of Afrobeats”, her influence spans continents, and her music is synonymous with elegance and sophistication. Collaborating with her is no small ambition, especially for someone like Portable, whose style contrasts sharply with Tiwa’s polished artistry.

However, this stark contrast is precisely what makes the idea so intriguing. Portable’s raw energy paired with Tiwa’s melodious finesse could result in a groundbreaking collaboration that bridges two different musical worlds. It is a testament to Portable’s creative vision and his willingness to take risks.

For Portable, this is not just about enhancing his profile; it is an opportunity to show his versatility and expand his reach. For Tiwa, a collaboration with Portable would highlight her openness to exploring diverse sounds and working with unconventional artists.

In the view of this writer, rather than questioning Portable’s audacity, it should serve as a lesson in self-belief.  In fact, Portable’s decision to publicly express his desire to work with Tiwa Savage reflects his audacity and self-belief. It takes courage to aim for such a high-profile collaboration, especially for an artist often stereotyped as a “street act.”

This audacity has been a defining characteristic of Portable’s career. He refuses to be boxed in by societal expectations or industry norms. His boldness is a reminder that greatness often requires stepping out of one’s comfort zone and challenging conventional thinking.

By setting his sights on Tiwa Savage, Portable is sending a clear message: talent transcends boundaries, and dreams are valid no matter one’s background.

Portable is no stranger to controversy. From his unfiltered social media posts to his run-ins with authorities, his name is often in the headlines for reasons beyond his music. However, these controversies should not overshadow the immense talent that has earned him a dedicated fanbase.

Portable’s music is a celebration of resilience and grit. His lyrics, often delivered in Yoruba and Pidgin English, capture the essence of street life in Nigeria. Songs like “ZazooZeh” are not just catchy; they are cultural phenomena that reflect the realities of his listeners.

Despite his unpolished persona, Portable possesses a deep understanding of rhythm, melody, and storytelling. His ability to craft songs that resonate with the masses speaks to his creative genius. His approach to music is intuitive and heartfelt, making him one of the most authentic voices in the industry today.

If this collaboration comes to fruition, it could mark a turning point in Portable’s career. It would provide him with a platform to showcase his versatility and challenge the stereotypes that have defined him.

For Tiwa Savage, working with Portable would demonstrate her ability to embrace and uplift raw, unconventional talent. The resulting track could be a fusion of Portable’s high-energy street vibes and Tiwa’s smooth, melodic sophistication, a blend that has the potential to break new ground in Nigerian music.

Such a collaboration could also inspire other mainstream artists to collaborate with emerging and unconventional talents, fostering inclusivity and diversity in the industry.

Portable has faced his fair share of criticism, with many dismissing him as a fleeting sensation or a controversial figure. However, his journey reveals a deeper story of resilience and determination.  Portable’s ability to weather criticism and stay true to his craft is a testament to his character. While detractors focus on his controversies, his fans see an artist who refuses to be silenced or sidelined. His boldness in pursuing a Tiwa Savage collaboration is yet another example of his refusal to let public opinion dictate his path.

Portable’s ambition to work with Tiwa Savage is not just about music; it is a lesson in dreaming big and taking bold steps toward those dreams. It is about believing in one’s talent, regardless of societal perceptions or limitations.

This ambition resonates beyond the music industry. It is a universal reminder that success often requires risk-taking, resilience, and a willingness to defy expectations. Portable’s journey is a source of inspiration for aspiring artists and creatives, proving that raw talent, when combined with audacity, can break barriers.

Portable is a polarizing figure in Nigerian music, but his creativity and talent are undeniable. His pursuit of a Tiwa Savage collaboration reflects his desire to evolve as an artist and push the boundaries of his craft.

While some may view this as an audacious move, it is a testament to Portable’s belief in his abilities and his willingness to explore new horizons. If this collaboration becomes a reality, it could redefine perceptions of both artists and highlight the power of diversity in music.

Portable’s story is one of raw talent, resilience, and unyielding ambition. As he continues to defy odds and challenge stereotypes, one thing is clear: Portable is much more than his controversies, he is a force of creativity worth celebrating.

Bitcoin has been setting new records regularly as investors hope that Trump will bring about a golden age of cryptocurrency, complete with more pro-business regulations and a possible national strategic bitcoin reserve or stockpile.

A surge in funding rates and open interest on the futures market precipitated this most recent action, putting the pioneer crypto asset within the $100K level on Friday.

The Bullish Debate

Social media speculation has exploded as Santiment data revealed that Bitcoin is poised to reach a six-figure market value for the first time in history, currently standing at a new all-time high of $99K.

Together, X, Reddit, Telegram, 4Chan, and BitcoinTalk are bringing up the $100K BTC price level at the fastest rate ever (naturally).

• However, this might be fueled by traders’ lack of confidence in this rally, as evidenced by unusually high mentions of lower price levels. Thank your fellow bears and non-believers for continuing this historic run, as the cryptocurrency markets move against the expectations of the majority.
• Data from CryptoQuant indicates that premiums in spot markets decreased around the same period. A surge of short liquidations, totaling over $120 million in a single day at one point, was also sparked by Bitcoin’s recent increases, which caused the price to rise overnight, according to CoinGlass.
• A few years ago, the $100K symbolic threshold might have seemed unattainable, but markets are now certain that it will happen soon because of its architecture’s features (a maximum of 21 million units and lack of a central authority to regulate it) and the appeal it has strengthened among traditional financial institutions like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.
• U.S. President-elect Trump made a remarkable comeback during the campaign, despite being categorized as “anti-crypto,” primarily because he was aware of the growing number of users and their voting rights. Additionally, the U.S. cryptocurrency market contributed the most to his campaign funding.

The campaign cost cryptocurrency companies like Coinbase more than $130 million. Trump’s term also suggests higher budget deficits, possibly higher inflation, and adjustments to the dollar’s global role—all of which would boost the price of Bitcoin.

The Bearish Argument

Bitcoin reaching $100,000 in the next few minutes appears more like a short-term end-of-rally goal than a turning point that would instantly push the asset to a much higher level. Although it is impossible to predict with certainty whether the digital asset will remain above the $100,000 mark for an extended period, we can assume that a correction towards the $75,000/$80,000 range would then be reasonable, especially in a market environment where the dollar has strengthened (+7 percent for the Dollar Index since the beginning of October), and headline interest rates have experienced a powerful rise (more than 90 basis points in two months).

• Rates and the dollar are recovering at a time when investors are unsure of how quickly the Fed will cut rates following Donald Trump’s election, and when the most recent price indices released in the U.S. demonstrate resilience, including the PPI (producer price index) and the CPI (consumer price index), not to mention the surprising increase in import prices last month. Jerome Powell’s most recent remarks affirmed that the Fed is not in a rush to cut interest rates.
• Several campaign pledges are anticipated to be fulfilled following his election, including establishing a national bitcoin reserve, providing a regulatory environment that is advantageous to businesses operating in the space, and appointing a pro-crypto individual to lead the SEC (the U.S. financial regulator). According to press rumors, the White House is considering hiring a crypto specialist. All of this helps the industry as a whole flourish.
• The cryptocurrency market has demonstrated its sensitivity to U.S. monetary policy, especially in 2022. Therefore, it is reasonable to ask whether Bitcoin will correct at this time. Technically speaking, this might occur if the old oblique makes contact again during the April and October 2021 peaks.

A price correction in that direction is likely in play. A stronger “pullback” might also push prices back toward the previous high of roughly $74,000 in March 2024. However, historical data has shown that Bitcoin is popularly known for disappointing skeptics and maintaining its bullish momentum.

[Nairametrics]

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Thursday has accused the All Progressives Congress (APC) led by Kapuepue, the younger brother of Tony Adun ( aka Tony Kabaka), of allegedly invading the  (PDP),  secretariat destroying and carting away properties worth millions of naira.

The party alleged that the thugs also destroyed doors, windows, and office equipment at the party’s Secretariat.

Reacting to the incident, the Publicity Secretary of the Edo PDP Caretaker Committee, Chris Osa Nehikhare, condemned the attack in the strongest terms, describing it as a desperate and reckless attempt by the APC to intimidate the PDP and frustrate the party’s efforts at reclaiming its mandate stolen at the September 21 governorship election.

He said, “It is pretty disappointing and unfortunate that the APC mobilised thugs to attack our party Secretariat on Thursday in their desperation to frustrate and halt efforts by our great party to reclaim the mandate duly given to it by the Edo people at the September 21 governorship election.

“The thugs led by Kapuepue, the younger brother of Tony Adun (aka Tony Kabaka), invaded the Secretariat, destroying and carting away properties worth millions of naira.

“If the APC are confident that they won the election free and square and have nothing to hide, why are they jittery and mobilising thugs to attack the PDP Secretariat.”

Nehikhare further noted, “This is barbaric and condemnable, and we urge relevant security agencies to investigate the attack thoroughly and ensure that the perpetrators of this dastardly act are brought to book.

“The PDP remains resolute and will not be intimidated or deterred in its pursuit for justice and the restoration of our mandate.”

He charged, “We are calling on our party members and supporters to remain calm and resolute in the face of the provocations as we explore every legal channel to reclaim our mandate.

But responding, the APC’s Publicity Secretary, Peter Uwadiae-Igbinigie, described the allegation as baseless and urged the PDP to settle its internal crisis, warning them not to drag the APC into their messy affair.

He said it was absurd to label those who allegedly attacked the PDP office as APC thugs, wondering if the thugs wore APC uniforms or had APC paraphernalia on them.

He noted that the APC government in the state had already embarked on projects the PDP government had failed to carry out, adding that his party was still basking in the euphoria of its victory and putting the state in the right direction.

He said, “How can the PDP say that the thugs that attacked their party secretariat are that of APC? Did the people have anything on them to show that they are APC members? The allegation is baseless, and there is no proof.

“The allegation is weighty and criminal, so the PDP should be sure they have proof before making it. We will urge the PDP to sort out its internal problem and not drag the APC into it.

The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has suspended its chairman, Mamman Mike Osuman, over what it described as ‘unauthorised statement’.

The ACF in a statement by Alhaji Bashir Muhammad Dalhatu and Alhaji Murtala Aliyu, Chairman, ACF Board of Trustees and Secretary General respectively said, “Mr Osuman was quoted as saying the North will back a northern candidate for the presidency, come 2027.”

They said the statements were made by the NEC chairman without consulting with other leaders and members of the ACF and thus, reflected Mr Osuman’s personal opinion only.

According the statement, “The attention of the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has been drawn to widely reported statements credited to Mr Mamman Mike Osuman, SAN, Chairman, ACF National Executive Committee (NEC), which were made during the meeting of the NEC, held on Wednesday, November, 2024, at ACF Headquarters, Kaduna. In particular, Mr Osuman was quoted as saying that the North will back a northern candidate for the presidency, come 2027.

“The statements were made by the NEC chairman without consulting with other leaders and members of the ACF and thus, reflected Mr Osuman’s personal opinion only.

“ACF rejects Mr Mamman Mike Osuman’s statements in their entirety. For this reason, the leadership of the ACF’s Board of Trustees (BOT) and that of its NEC has decided to place Mr Mamman Mike Osuman on suspension with immediate effect. A committee has been constituted for further investigations.”

[DailyTrust]