Image
Admin

Admin

1. On 24 June 2023, Sierra Leonean voters went to the polls to elect a President, Parliamentarians, Mayors or District Council Chairpersons, and Local Councilors.
2. Consistent with provisionsof Articles 12 and 13 of the ECOWAS Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, which mandates the Commission of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to provide assistance to member States conducting elections, the ECOWAS Commission:

• Deployed a pre-electoral fact-finding mission, jointly conducted with the African Union (AU);

• Provided capacity building for stakeholders on Dialogue and Mediation;

• Conducted training on media in Election Reporting;

• Had an engagement with the Chief Executives and Senior Editors of Media Houses on management of Election Reporting in partnership with the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL),

• Provided financial assistance to the tune of USD 500,000, in support of the conduct of the general elections.

3. The purpose of the Joint ECOWAS-African Union pre-electoral fact-finding Mission was to assess the state of preparedness of the election management body and other critical stakeholders. In particular, the Joint Mission held discussions with the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL), the Political Party Regulations Commission (PPRC), the Independent Commission for Peace and National Cohesion (ICPNC), the Office of National Security (ONS), the Sierra Leone Police service, political parties, including the Sierra Leone. Peoples Party (SLPP) and All People's Congress (APC), and Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDA), civil society organizations and representatives of Diplomatic Missions.

4. Based on its findings, the ECOWAS Commission deployed appropriate preventive diplomacy measures, including the facilitation of an interactive workshop on dialogue and mediation for political actors and stakeholders on peaceful elections, in partnership with the Independent Commission for Peace and National Cohesion (ICPNC). The Commission equally organized training for targeted media professionals in both print and electronic, including social media in three regions, namely: Freetown, Bo and Port Loko. This was followed up with engagements with Chief Executives and Senior Editors of Media Houses on Election Reporting in partnership with the ECSL, with the aim of addressing the challenges of disinformation, misinformation and mal-information.

5. In the build up to the 24 June 2023 election, and in furtherance of provisions of Articles 14 to 16 of the Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, the President of the ECOWAS Commission, His Excellency Dr. Omar Alieu Touray, deployed an Election Observation Mission (EOM) comprising 15 Long-Term and 80 Short-Term observers to Sierra Leone. The mission is led by His Excellency Dr. Mohamed Ibn Chambas, AU Special Envoy on Silencing the Guns, former Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel and a former President of the ECOWAS Commission. The Head of Mission is assisted by His Excellency Ambassador Ansoumana Ceesay, former Special Representative of the ECOWAS President to Liberia and Guinea-Bissau. The Mission is supported by a technical team from the ECOWAS Commission, led by the Commissioner for Political Affairs, Peace and Security, Ambassador Abdel-Fatau Musah, and the Resident Representative of ECOWAS in Sierra Leone, Ambassador Harouna Moussa.

6. The ECOWAS EOM is deployed with a mandate to observe the conduct of critical phases before, during and after electoral process, with a view to making critical recommendations for the improvement of the electoral process in the future. The EOM also serves as a rapid response mechanism for preventive diplomacy initiatives on challenges around the electoral processes.

7. The membership of the EOM is drawn from the ECOWAS Parliament, Community Court of Justice, the ECOWAS Permanent Representatives Committee, the Council of the Wise, Foreign Affairs Ministries and Electoral Commissions of Member States, as well as Civil Society Organizations.

II. CONTEXT OF THE 2023 GENERAL ELECTIONS

8. The 2023 General elections are the fifth consecutive nationwide elections in Sierra Leone since the end of the civil war in 2002, and the second since the United Nations Integrated Peacebuilding Office in Sierra Leone (UNIPSIL) completed its mandate in March 2014. It is also the second elections to be mainly funded and independently managed by the country. The country has also successfully navigated two transitions of power between a ruling political party and an opposition party, thus strengthening the country's credentials as a stable multi-party democracy in the West African region.

9. The 2023 General elections are taking place at a critical point in the political landscape of the region including lingering economic impacts of COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and three Member States suspended by ECOWAS over military take-over of democratic governments.

10. Following the passage of an amended Public Elections Act and the Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Act in 2022, the legal framework for the conduct of the 2023 General elections introduced some innovations to the , (6- electoral process, most significantly the obligation for political parties to ensure that at least 30% of candidates for elective offices are women. This signals a commendable commitment to increase women's participation and representation in politics and governance.

11.Other novelties of the 2023 electoral reforms and process are the use of the Proportional Representation system for both the Parliamentary and Local Council elections. The ECOWAS Election Observation Mission, however, notes the general perception of trust deficits among stakeholders in the electoral process, especially with the introduction of the Proportional Representation system.

12.Using data obtained from the National Civil Registration Authority (NCRA), the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL) embarked on a voter registration exercise that involved verification of biometric data, for citizens already captured in the Civil Register, and the capturing of biometric data for eligible citizens who had not yet been captured in the Civil Register. At the end of the process in December 2022, the ECSL had registered three million, three hundred and seventy-four thousand, two hundred and fifty-eight (3,374,258) voters. The distribution of voters' cards was carried out between February and March 2023. However, there were complaints of some voters' cards having blurry pictures.

13.The election campaign period kicked off on 23 May 2023 and ran through to 22 June 2023. On 25 May 2023, all the Presidential candidates signed the Electoral Pledge, committing themselves, and their political parties, to upholding peace before, during and after the elections. The parties also agreed to use legal means to seek redress for any electoral disputes. The ECOWAS Mission notes that although campaign events were largely peaceful, there were some skirmishes between supporters of the two main political parties, the SLPP and  the APC. The use of social media platforms to spread hate speech, misinformation, and incite violence was prevalent. The Mission noted reports of attacks against the offices and homes of political party members and leaders in some parts of the country, including the Secretariat of the All Peoples' Congress (APC) in Bo and the home of one of its members in Kono, respectively.

14.The Mission notes the relative freedom the media enjoy, with both the print and electronic media landscape in Sierra Leone offering plural and diverse platforms for citizens to have access to relevant information on the electoral process.

15. On 15 June 2023, early voting was organized for registered voters traveling to Mecca for the Muslim pilgrimage. Although the aim was to ensure that eligible voters are not disenfranchised by virtue of observance of their religious obligations, the exercise was marred by controversy owing to insufficient communication by the ECSL and the source of the ballot papers used. It should be noted that the ballot papers for the 2023 General elections were printed in South Africa and arrived in Sierra Leone on 17 June 2023.

III. ENGAGEMENTS WITH STAKEHOLDERS
16.Upon arrival in Freetown on 20 June 2023, the Head of Mission and his delegation held consultations with relevant stakeholders on the electoral process, including with the President of the Republic and candidate of the SLPP, H.E. Maada Bio, the APC candidate, Dr. Samura Kamara and other presidential candidates and political parties taking part in the election.

17.The Mission equally held consultations with the Chairperson and Commissioners of the Electoral Commission of Sierra Leone (ECSL) and the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC), the Office of National Security (ONS), the Inspector General of Police and other critical stakeholders including Civil Society organizations and the National Early Warning and Response Mechanisms Coordination Centre (NEWRMC-SL). The pre-election meetings were to assess preparedness for the elections and concerns raised by some political parties and candidates. In particular, the ECSL assured the Mission of its readiness and commitment to conduct credible, free, fair and transparent elections in compliance with the electoral legal framework.

18.The Mission also held consultations with other Heads of International Election Observation Missions, including the African Union (AU), the Commonwealth, the European Union (EU), the Carter Center, the West Africa Elders Forum (WAEF), as well as the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for West Africa and the Sahel.

19. Following concerns raised by some stakeholders about violence and intimidation, alleged misuse of social media and modalities for the tallying and transmission of election results, the ECOWAS and AU Election Observation Missions issued a Joint Statement on 22 June 2023, calling on all stakeholders to be guided by the spirit of consensus building based on the rule of law and to adhere to the political parties' code of conduct. The Statement also urged the security forces to remain apolitical and professional in the discharge of their duties toward all citizens, cognizant of the rights of all under the Constitution of Sierra Leone. It further called on the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL) to remain impartial in the execution of its mandate, in the greater interest of all Sierra Leoneans, and for citizens and civil society groups to continue the pursuit of initiatives aimed at promoting peaceful elections and national cohesion. 

IV. ELECTION DAY

20. On Election Day, the Mission deployed 95 observers, grouped into 39 observer teams, in 15 Districts. The observers visited 337 Polling stations spread across both urban (44%) and rural areas (56%), and reported the following:
Opening of the polls

21.In a significant number of Polling stations visited (57.14%), polling staff and materials did not arrive before the scheduled start time of 7:00 am. Notably, at Polling Centre 16059 at Apple School field in Wellington, Freetown, where ballot papers were not available. Polling staff explained that the ballot papers had been taken to another Polling Center at Gideon Secondary School. Simi-larly, at Polling Unit number 3 of Methodist High School in Bo, polling staff ar-rived well after the official commencement time of 7:00 am. In addition, a Poll-ing Centre at SOS International School at the Lumley Beach Road, election ma-terials did not arrive until after 8:45 am, and even when they arrived the ballot boxes did not have covers, causing delays in commencement of the polls. These delays caused frustrations among some voters, who got agitated.

22.In 37% of Polling stations observed, polling commenced within the first hour while in 63% of cases polling started with considerable delays due to the late arrival of polling staff and materials.

23. Polling Centres were however easily identifiable to voters.

24.The atmosphere at Polling stations was generally peaceful with security agents present in 92% of the stations visited.

25.0n average, there were about five (5) party and/or candidate agents present at the polling stations visited, with SLPP represented in 98% of Polling stations and APC represented in 94% of Polling stations.

26.There were domestic and international election observers from the African Union, European Union, National Elections Watch (NEW), Election Observers Network, Pentecostal Fellowship of Sierra Leone, and West Africa Democracy Solidarity Network.
Polling process

27.Almost 98% of Polling stations were set up in a way that guaranteed the secrecy of the vote. In few cases, however, such as at Polling station no. 4 of the Polling Centre located at Hockey Pitch 1 by football field pavilion in Wilber-force (Western Area Urban), the voting screen was placed such that it did not provide adequate cover for voters to secretly express their choice.

28.In general, voters were required to present their voter's card to cast their vote. Nonetheless, in 8% of Polling stations visited, observers witnessed voters being allowed to vote without their voter's card. Such voters either presented their voter registration slip or other forms of identity that tallied with the de-tails on the voters' register. There were also cases, notably at Sierra Leone Grammar School in Aberdeen (Western Area Urban), Administrative Court in Kambia, and Port Loko Catholic Primary School (North-West Region), where voters who had voter's cards could not find their names on the Voters' register and were thus not allowed to vote.

29.Voting materials were generally available in sufficient quantities. However, in 7% of Polling stations visited, there was one type of electoral material or the other that was not available, such as indelible ink, Reconciliation and Results. Forms (RRF), Gender Tally sheets, Tamper-evident envelopes (TEEs), and ink-pads.

30.1t is also instructive to note that most of the polling stations visited the polling agents and officials were not easily identifiable as they had no official attire, neither badges to identify them.

31.With respect to inclusion, 63% of Polling stations visited were accessible to Persons living with Disability (PWDs). Observers also reported that there were tactile ballot jackets in 33% of the Polling stations.

32.Observers did not witness any active campaigning around the Polling centres visited.

33.A notable incident occurred at the Polling Centre located at U.M.0 Primary School, Ropolor Road in Tonkolili, where the Ballot Paper Issuer 1 was only issuing ballot papers for the Legislative election and not the Presidential election. Chaos ensued at around 11:45 am when the APC District Youth leader came and noticed the situation. The ensuing chaos led to security agents in-tervening and stopping the process. Similarly, observers in Kono confirmed an attack on the APC Deputy Mayoral candidate, Mr. Sillah, by some youths in the

Closing and counting
34.Despite the delays experienced at the opening, 52% of Polling Stations visited closed on time. In the 13% of Polling stations where voters were still waiting to vote, they were allowed to do so.

35.Security agents were present at the close of polls in 97% of the Polling stations observed.

36.In 84% of Polling stations visited, the lighting conditions when vote-counting commenced were adequate but as the process proceeded they deteriorated significantly. Sorting and counting of ballot papers was done at the Polling stations and in clear view of party agents and observers.

37.Reconciliation and Results Forms (RRFs) were filled out at the Polling station and party agents allowed to endorse them.

V. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS

38.The mission notes that despite some early challenges, polling generally pro-ceeded smoothly and in a largely peaceful atmosphere, and eligible voters were able to freely participate in the process.

39. The mission commends the sense of patriotism exhibited by polling staff, the security forces, the general populace, who collectively played their parts in ensuring a peaceful conduct of the 2023 general elections.

40.The mission, however, expresses regret that major political parties pre-empted the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL) by rushing to announce their "victory' in the polls before the official announcement by the ECSL.

41. The ECOWAS Election Observation Mission wishes to appeal to all stakeholders, particularly the political parties, candidates and their supporters, the security forces and the general citizenry to remain calm and patiently await the announcement of the results by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone.

42.Similarly the Mission wishes to appeal to candidates and political parties to refrain from making any statements that may lead to a breach of the peace.

43.The Mission further urges the Electoral Commission to diligently, but urgently, work to ensure the timely release of the results to avoid any tensions.

44.The Mission reminds the candidates and the political parties of their commitment under the Election Pledge to use only lawful channels in addressing any disputes emerging out of the conduct of the 2023 general elections.

45.The Mission highly praises the patience and sense of patriotism so far exhibited by the vast majority of the electorate, and would wish to urge same display of high sense of maturity, whilst awaiting the official announcement of the results by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone.
Done in Freetown, Sierra Leone, on 26 June 2023.

H.E. Dr Mohamed Ibn Chambas

Head, ECOWAS Election Observation Mission

 

 

 

The ECOWAS Election Observation Mission to Sierra Leone’s 24th June 2023 General Elections said the polls took place “generally smoothly and in a largely peaceful atmosphere and eligible voters were able to freely participate in the process … despite some early challenges.”

The challenges identified by the Mission included the late arrival of polling officials and materials resulting in some voters being agitated, leading to the extension of balloting, with the counting and tallying of votes ending late in some polling centers.

“The (ECOWAS) Mission commends the sense of patriotism exhibited by polling staff, the security forces, the general populace, who collectively played their parts in ensuring a peaceful conduct of the 2023 general elections,” Dr Mohamed Ibn Chambas, Head of Mission said in the Preliminary Declaration in Freetown on Monday, 26th June.

“The Mission, however, expresses regret that major political parties pre-empted the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL) by rushing to announce their “victory” in the polls before the official announcement by the ECSL,” the statement said.

The Mission, therefore, appealed “to all stakeholders, particularly the political parties, candidates and their supporters, the security forces and the general citizenry to remain calm and patiently await the announcement of the results by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone.”

It enjoined “candidates and political parties to refrain from making any statements that may lead to a breach of the peace,” reiterating that the ECSL remained the sole institution vested by the constitution with the authority to announce the results of the General Elections.

“The Mission further urges the Electoral Commission to diligently, but urgently, work to ensure the timely release of the results to avoid any tensions,” the statement said, while reminding “the candidates and the political parties of their commitment under the Election Peace Pledge to use only lawful channels in addressing any dispute that may emerge from the conduct of the 2023 general elections.”

The Mission praised “the patience and sense of patriotism so far exhibited by the vast majority of the electorate” and urged “same display of high sense of maturity, whilst awaiting the official announcement of the results by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone,” the statement added.

From the 60% provisional results of the elections released by the ECSL on Monday, incumbent President Julius Maada Bio of the ruling SLPP was leading the other 12 candidates having received 1,067,666 of the votes declared.

His closest rival, Dr Samura Kamara, the main opposition candidate of the APC, was credited with 793,751 votes.

The two candidates, control about 98% of the votes but if no candidate gets the mandatory 55% valid votes in the first round, the two frontrunners will go into a run-off election two weeks after the official release of the first-round results.

Meanwhile, the Heads of International Election Observation Missions from ECOWAS, AU, and Commonwealth, as well as the AU Panel of the Wise and the West African Elders’ Forum, have intensified mediation and preventive diplomacy efforts to ensure post-election peace in Sierra Leone, which has now held five general elections with two peaceful transfers of power after 20 years since the end of its 10-year civil war in 2002.

The heads of missions met with President Bio and Dr Kamara, as well as the ECSL leadership and Coordinator of the Office of National Security, and civil society organizations before and after the elections, echoing the message of peace and conciliation for the consolidation of democracy in Sierra Leone and the entire ECOWAS region.

They also called for an urgent and impartial investigation of the reported presence of security forces at the APC headquarters in Freetown and the alleged death of one of the party members on Sunday, 25th June 2023 from a life bullet.

The ECOWAS Mission, led by Dr Mohamed Ibn Chambas is supported by Deputy Head of Mission Amb. Ansumana Ceesay, Amb. Abdel-Fatau Musah, ECOWAS Commissioner for Political Affairs, Peace, and Security, ECOWAS Resident Representative in Sierra Leone, Amb. Moussa Harouna, Mr Serigne Ka, Ag Head of ECOWAS Electoral Assistance Division, Dr. Onyinye Onwuka, Head of Division, Mediation and Coordination of Regional Political Affairs, and Mr Ebenezer Bruno Asiedu, Head of Division, Democracy and Good Governance.

The AU Mission was headed by former Ethiopian Prime Minister H.E. Hailemariam Desalegne Boshe, while former Nigerian Vice-President Prof. Yemi Osinbajo led the Commonwealth Mission.

Former Nigerian President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan, led the West Africa Elders’ Forum, and Justice Effie Owuor, the AU Panel of the Wise.

ECOWAS deployed 15 Long-Term and 80 Short-Term Observers in 15 of Sierra Leone’s 16 electoral districts for the elections.

It also supported the electoral process with five hundred thousand US dollars (US$500,000) after despatching a joint pre-election fact-finding Mission with the AU to the country in April to assess the political environment.

 

How to Work and Study in the UK and other Commonwealth Countries

  • Date: Saturday, July 1st, 2023
  • Time: 11 am (GMT+1)
  • Venue: CIAPS TV
  • Attendance: Virtual

This CIAPS Career Development Event with the theme International Pathway for Medical Professionals is an informative session designed for medical professionals planning to study or work in the UK and other Commonwealth Countries.

It will help medical professionals in their desire to become truly global professionals by giving them insight to what they need to know, do and avoid if they want to work or study in the UK and other Commonwealth Countries.

It has been designed by the CIAPS School of Health and Social Care.

Participants will get the chance to interact with practicing professionals and academics that will provide information on available opportunities and requirements for medical professionals that want to practice in the UK and other Commonwealth Countries.

Venue:  CIAPS TV

Date and Time: Saturday, July 1st, 2023. From 11 am (GMT+1) prompt

Book Now

For booking reservations and further enquiries, please fill out the form below to register

First name 

Last Name 

Title           

Job Position 

Email Address 

Country 

City 

Whatsapp Number

How did you hear about the event? (Required)


Name of your organisation

Names of extra person(s) you would also like to book for












Today's Date 

The mutiny by Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the Russian private military contractor Wagner Group, against the Russian military, highlights one of the challenges of engaging mercenaries or private military contractors of any hue, including thugs, to help a state prosecute its wars and police actions. Prigozhin, a long term ally of the Russian strong man Vladmir Putin, rose to prominence after his mercenaries helped Russia to raise its flag in the eastern Ukrainian city of Bakhmut in April this year following a long and bloody battle.

Emboldened by its successes, Prigozhin began to accuse Russia’s top military chiefs of being responsible for the failures and setbacks in the Ukrainian conflict. The feud reached new heights on Saturday, June 24 2023, when Prigozhin alleged that a Wagner camp in Ukraine had been attacked “from the rear” by Russia’s military. The Russian Defense Ministry denied the accusation.

Prigozhin then claimed his fighters had crossed from the occupied eastern Ukraine into the Russian border city of Rostov-On-Don and that they would fight anyone who tried to stop them. They later began an audacious march to Moscow, capital of Russia, before suddenly turning back – arguing that it did not want to see the spilling of Russian blood. Wagner, is understood to have fought in Syria, the Central African Republic, Libya, Mali, Sudan, and Mozambique.

How does Asari Dokubo come into this?

Asari Dokubo, an ex-militant and leader of the defunct Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer Force, has been in the news recently. A loquacious and attention-seeking supporter of President Tinubu during the campaigns, he visited the Presidential Villa recently and not only had a photo Op with the President, but was also given a rare and ill-advised privilege of hosting a press conference at the State House behind Nigeria’s Coat of Arms. In that press conference Dokubo took on the Nigerian military and accused their high command of being behind oil bunkering in the Niger Delta region. He also claimed that his “men” and not the Nigerian military were responsible for securing the Abuja-Kaduna road and other hot spots in the country. As he put it: “There is a full-scale war going on and the blackmail of the Nigerian state by the Nigerian military is shameful. They said they do not have enough armament and people listen to this false narrative. They are lying. They are liars. I repeat they are liars because I am a participant…

“I am a participant in this war. I fight on the side of the government of the Nigerian state in Plateau, Niger, Anambra, Imo, Abia and Rivers. And in Abuja today, you are travelling to Kaduna on this road. It is not the army that makes it possible for you to travel to Abuja or travel to Kaduna, and vice versa. It is my men, employed by the government of the Nigerian state, stationed in Niger.”

If the above claims are true, it means that Asari Dokubo either runs a private military company which the government engages or is a thug in control of armed militia engaged by, or working in conjunction with some elements in the government. Whichever is the case here brings up the whole discussion about the state engagement of private military contractors of any hue in the provision of security:

Modern private military companies (PMCs) have evolved from their origins from a group of ex Special Air Service (SAS) unit of the British Army who in 1965 founded WatchGuard International. There was a dramatic growth in the number and size of PMCs at the end of the Cold War with the exodus of some six million military personnel from Western militaries. Some of the better known PMCs include Blackwater and Vinnell Corporation (USA), G4S and Keeni-Meeny Services (United Kingdom), Lordan-Levdan (Israel), Executive Outcomes (South Africa) and Wagner Group (Russia). Though there was a United Nations Mercenary Convention in 1989 banning the use of mercenaries, which came into force on 20 October 2001, (as of August 2021, the convention had been ratified by 37 states, and signed but not ratified by 9 states), several countries continue to use different forms of PMCs, whose duties could differ depending on who hires them.

Supporters of PMCs often argue that it is cost effective, especially in a situation where the local security agencies are stretched. The argument is that once a contract is awarded to the PMC, the government does not have to worry about stuffs like feeding the fighters, clothing them or providing medical care as the PMC would be responsible for all those. While we do not have details of any government contract with Asari Dokubo or any other military or paramilitary contractor, we have not heard them complaining of being under-equipped as we regularly hear from our soldiers. In fact, while Tompolo’s N48bn oil pipeline surveillance contract has been credited with increase in oil production in Niger Delta by tackling oil bunkering, Asari Dokubo is claiming credit for the relative safety on some hitherto dangerous Nigerian roads “at a fraction of what the military spends.”

One of the criticisms of PMCs is that there are issues of oversight in their operations and of control and subordination to authorities. We see this insubordination to formal authorities playing out in the Wagner conflict with Russian military leadership and in the recent attacks on the Nigerian military by Asari Dokubo. What is shocking is the rather tepid response to Dokubo’s attacks on the military and the state turning a blind eye even when he was brandishing an AK47 and threatening an ethnic group. This raises the question of the nature of Asari Dokubo’s contract with the Nigerian state, (if such exists) and whether like Yevgeny Prigozhin he is already growing too big for Nigeria’s political and military leadership.

Given Asari Dokubo’s loquaciousness and antecedents as a violence entrepreneur, including shifty alliances, promotion of provincialism and recently Igbophobia, his warm embrace by President Tinubu compounds his (Tinubu’s) image problems and negates his recent efforts to distance Tinubu the President from the Tinubu of Boudillon. During the campaigns Dokubo claimed that when he was in prison Tinubu paid his children’s school fees, bought him his first car and even gave him a house. While we do not know the nature of the cord that binds them together, there is no doubt that a chummy relationship with such a character will make it more difficult for Tinubu to successfully re-invent himself as a statesman – as he seems to be striving to do since he became President.

It is generally unreliable, if not dangerous, for a state to depend on non-state actors for the provision of security. The modern State, according to the German sociologist Max Weber, “is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” The outsourcing of aspects of security to PMCs questions this monopoly – as we have seen from the outbursts of both Prigozhin and Dokubo against Russia’s and Nigeria’s conventional militaries respectively. It should be borne in mind that in situations of armed conflict, the return to public order can be achieved only if the state’s legitimacy is restored and not if PMCs claim that they restored security for the state. Besides, since mercenaries have vested interests in the perpetuation of conflicts in order to remain in business, even if they succeed in helping to restore order in one conflict zone, they will surely want to open another conflict zone to remain in business. In essence since outsourcing aspects of security to violence entrepreneurs carries the risk of the PMC doing a Prigozhin, it is something that should be properly thought through by any government.

Jideofor Adibe is Professor of Political Science and International Relations at Nasarawa State

 

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has said many grants from the World Bank are marred in corruption.

Prof. Bolaji Owasanoye, Chairman of the anti-corruption body, said this when he hosted a delegation of the Economic and Organised Crime Office of Ghana recently.

Owasanoye, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), said the political economy of the international ecosystem was not designed for developing countries to progress in the fight against corruption.

“We have to understand as developing countries that the political economy of the international ecosystem is not designed for us to progress no matter how hard we try.’

“It is enlightened self-interest. For example, Nigeria borrowed one billion dollars in 1978. As at 2006, when we had the write-off, Nigeria was owing 32 billion dollars and it is designed in that way because of their rules of engagement and dispute resolution. The rule uses the IMF and the World Bank to whip you into line when you want to challenge the debt.

“How many countries have taken the World Bank to court? Does it not have failed loans? Many of the loans the World Bank grants are marred in corruption but nobody has the courage to take them to court because those issues are usually politically determined,” he said.


Lamenting how developing countries get swayed by outcomes of international surveys, the ICPC boss said it was wrong to use perception surveys to compare experience surveys.

He said: “In developing countries, we are driven by the outcomes and report of international surveys. International surveys are not innocent, and it is naïve to think they are otherwise. If you do not create a system where your voice is heard, a kind of platform where you say your own and refuse to be driven by the outcome of those reports, you will continue to be apologetic.

“I was in Abidjan last year and I spoke in a panel that had representatives from Transparency International and I told them it is wrong to use perception survey to compare experience survey, it is like comparing sleep with death.

“Is it not strange that Transparency International will rank countries that are losing assets as more corrupt than the countries receiving the stolen properties? And under the common law, both the thief and the receiver of stolen properties are both guilty. But when they rate us, they will rate the receiving countries as being more honest but those of us whose properties are stolen every day are rated to be more corrupt


“We must have a home-grown approach because it makes our work easier. We try to do our own survey where we talk to people, document and publish it so that when someone throws TI’s index to my face, I will tell them I have my own survey before you form an opinion.”

Vice President Kashim Shettima, has said that the government of President Bola Tinubu would create one million jobs in the digital world for the youths.

Shettima made the statement on Monday when he received a delegation from the Republic of Korea led by the Special Envoy to the President, H.E. Jang Sungmin, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.


He solicited for their partnership, noting that: “We are willing to partner with you in the area of technology because by 2030, there will be a 65% global talent deficit with the US, Russia and Brazil suffering 6 million talent deficits. I believe Nigeria is in a unique position to fill in those talent deficits because ours is a young nation.

“75% of Nigerians are below the age of 35, so we are soliciting for your partnership and support in digital skills training for our young people.

“We want to create 1 million jobs in the digital world. India earned $120B last year from global outsourcing and we are in a unique position to take advantage of the opportunities in the sector.

“We need the skills set, we need the technology to drive the process and yours is a technology that we can embrace.”

Former Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo, SAN, has said that Nigerians should be proud for having Bola Ahmed Tinubu as president.

 

He disclosed this on his Twitter handle, while describing Tinubu as a great economist that knows how to turn things around for better.


According to him: “A new crop of leaders are emerging in Africa that have clear ideas as to how they want their various economies and societies to be run so as to prioritise their self-sustenance and cultural imperatives over and above theories and conditionalities of the Western World and other bigger economies that do not sit well with their people.


“We should be proud that we have @officialABAT at this time as President who, from a rich antecedent, knows all the nuances of how to grow a modern economy and can easily connect with other African leaders on such initiatives”.

The European Union Election Observation Mission has presented its final report on this year’s general elections to the Independent National Electoral Commission.

This was disclosed on Monday via its Twitter by INEC


The EU Mission was received by the INEC Chairman, Mahmood Yakubu, and the National Commissioners of the electoral body.

The tweet read: “The European Union Election Observation Mission, today, presented its final report on the 2023 general elections to the commission.

“INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, and National Commissioners were on hand to receive the visitors.”

The EU had in February 27, 2023 revealed in its report that lack of transparency in the conduct of the 2023 general elections deflated public trust in INEC.

It also noted that public confidence in INEC’s independence, professionalism and voter information efforts decreased even before February 25.

While the EU acknowledged that the election took place as planned, it said operational failures, which challenged the right to vote, contributed to the reduced trust in the process.

Despite a court order reinstating them into service, some dismissed police officers have petitioned the Acting Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to review their dismissal and correct the obvious injustice against them.

The officer who was forced to retire asked Egbetokun to order the Police Service Commission (PSC) and the Force Secretary to reconsider their dismissal and reinstate them as ordered by the Industrial Court.

The officers, speaking through their representative in a statement issued and signed by Emmanuel Idris, said they were forced to retire from the force despite a court ruling ordering the Nigeria Police Force and the Police Service Commission not to forcefully retire them because they had not served for 60 years or 35 years.

The officers, who are members of cadet inspector force entrants 33, 34, and 35, have petitioned the police chief to implement the court’s decision to reinstate them.

They expressed concern about the failure of the previous IGP, Usman Alkali Baba, and other relevant authorities to follow the court’s ruling.

According to the sacked officers, the court delivered the judgment in April 2022, and the defendants have yet to implement the judgment, which was delivered by NICN Justice Oyewumi Oyebiola.

The statement stated that;

This judgement has been given since April last year. But to our dismay, the former IGP vehemently refused to do the needful even after the directives to do so and the advice from the police service commission and police legal department, respectively.

The action of the former IGP was also puzzling when he immediately implemented a similar court judgement not long ago involving our ASP counterparts of courses 18,19 and 20.

It became surprising why what was sauce for the geese was not sauce for the gander. The letter from the PSC as well as the advice from the CP legal to the former IGP.

We, the members of the above courses force entrants, are appealing to you to help in the implementation of the court judgement in suit number NICN /ABJ/281/2021CSP ECONG EGWO EGONG&3OTHERS VS PSC AND TWO OTHERS.

Your Contemporaries and those who have had the opportunity to work with you all attested to your integrity. That you are an Officer who does his job with the fear of God, fairness, equity and justice.

Consequently, we urge our new IGP to use his good offices to correct this obvious injustice. Wishing you a prosperous tenure as you take up the mantle of leadership of Nigeria Police.

Governor Alex Otti of Abia State has set up a judicial panel of inquiry tasked with recovering government properties from the state government officials who served under the administration of his predecessor, Okezie Ikpeazu.

 

Mr Ikpeazu of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) served as a two-term governor of the state from 29 May 2015 to 29 May 2023, when he handed over to Mr Otti.


Mr Otti, the Labour Party candidate in the 18 March governorship election in the state, defeated the ruling PDP candidate, Okey Ahiwe, to emerge the winner.


The Secretary to the State government (SSG), Kenneth Kalu, announced the setting up the judicial panel of inquiry in a statement on Friday.

A judge of the State High Court Umuahia, Florence Duruoha-Igwe, was named the panel chairperson.

According to the statement, other panel members include Ekeoma Ogwo, a professor; Ugochukwu Okoroafor, Alex Okonkwo, a catholic priest] and Ngozi Akanwa, a professor.

Mr Otti, earlier this month, had ordered former state officials to return the government’s properties in their possession or face sanctions.

The SSG did not mention the names of the former officials, but it is believed that he was referring to government officials who served under Mr Ikpeazu.

Mr Otti, since he was sworn in as governor on 29 May, has been in a war of words with Mr Ikpeazu, whom he accused of leaving “huge debts” and zero assets for the new administration.


But the former governor has repeatedly denied the allegations.