An unprecedented and thoroughly depressing chapter in the contemporary diminution of the judiciary and consequential erosion of the rule of law in Nigeria was written with two contributions on the Senate floor during the valedictory session of the 9th Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Senator Rochas Okorocha expressed mock awe at how the Senate President Ahmed Lawan found his way back to the Senate without contesting in his party’s primaries for the seat, and hence ineligible for the election at all; with the innuendoes pointing at the inexplicable and widely criticized judicial decision which occasioned that otherwise most improbable feat. If Okorocha’s denigration and disdain of the judicial interventions in Nigeria’s political contests was oblique, Senator Bulkachuwa’s was pointedly brazen and as bad as it could possibly be.

Senator Bulkachuwa, without any prodding confessed to enabling high level judicial corruption by the instrumentality of his spousal relationship; stating to the obvious discomfiture of the Senate President how his wife aided his colleagues and political friends to prevail in their litigations. It is common knowledge that his wife was the immediate past President of the Court of Appeal, the second most powerful office in the Nigerian judicial architecture. The lofty perch of the office, among other great powers, entitles the occupant to appoint judges into and to constitute election petitions tribunals for all the elections in the country. The magnitude of the matter and the potentiality for the destabilization of the electoral process and the entire polity could be grasped in the light of the normalization of litigation as the concluding part of electoral contests in Nigeria.

Oftentimes threats to the rule of law are perceived as primarily springing from executive lawlessness, but sight may be lost of the grave dangers a not-fit-for purpose judiciary usually poses to the rule of law. An integral element of the rule of law is a high degree of clarity and certainty of the law. This twin qualities of clarity and certainty infuse law with predictability which at the elementary level encompasses reasonableness and commonsense available to the lawyer and layman alike; and at a secondary level, and particularly for the lawyer (and the judge), logic, clarity of thought and strong belief in the guidance of precedent.

Ultimately, the courts assisted by the parties’ lawyers determine the law in given cases and what fashions that determination, the decision, are these identified qualities and indices.

When the law lacks certainty and predictability, as inevitably happens when precedents are disregarded and the reasonable person’s sense of justice assaulted by judicial decisions, the judge invariably falls under closer scrutiny; with the suspicion of incompetence or corruption becoming rife. And instead of the rule of law, the rule of the whims and fancies of the powerful cloaked with judicial imprimatur would hold sway; with dire consequences for economic progress and the polity in general, not just the rule of law. It is axiomatic that liberal inflow of international investments and absence of rule of law are mutually exclusive.

Similarly, the existence of great gap between the letters of the law on one hand and judicial and administrative decisions on the other breeds dissonance between actions and due consequences, with attendant social disorder characterized by high crime rate, pervasive corruption, ethnic and religious disharmony of which Nigeria is a prime example.

The present storm brewed in the Senate Chambers brings back to the front burner the critical issue of recruitment to the judiciary. There is universal agreement within and outside the country that the quality of adjudication by Nigerian courts has progressively regressed over the past thirty years or more. The quality of the judicial personnel, in terms of character and learning, is all important. Knaves, some of whom are amongst the ranks of Nigerian lawyers, have inevitably found their way to the Bench given the progressively declining filtration process and patronage system which is contemptuous of merit. Outright knavery is not the only problem and there is also that of weak personalities who easily succumb to sundry societal pressures including the family induced, religious, personal, community and such other mundane considerations that are quite contrary to the judicial oath of office.

These character flaws in some cases translate to or result in judicial corruption occasioning the bizarre decisions which hardly any honest practitioner can justify given the unbridgeable gap between those decisions and their facts with the applicable law. But there is also the problem of insufficient knowledge of law on the part of some judges and which yields the same outcome of clearly unjustifiable decisions. Nigerian newspapers had widely reported the revelation by the immediate past President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Olu Akpata, of how one of the candidates for appointment to the Court of Appeal did not understand one of the most basic legal concepts. The standard justification for the promoters and supporters of such sub-standard appointments is that the appointees would learn on the job. But why would the system be clogged with those of deficient knowledge when there are still willing and sufficiently knowledgeable candidates yet to be appointed.

President Tinubu in his 2023 June 12 Day speech warned the judiciary against making decisions that have potentialities of truncating democracy.

He has been rightly criticized in many quarters for what amounts to a subtle intimidation of the judiciary before which is pending the gargantuan task of determination of the validity of his victory in the presidential polls. However, there is so much the Executive at the state and national levels can do in restoring the past glory of the judiciary especially since the latter has been finding it very difficult to help itself by effective sole self- regulation. Beyond improved funding as a priority, the Executive which has a critical role to play in the process should ensure that the laid down rules and criteria for appointment are followed strictly, and thus making for a transparent and merit-driven recruitment in practice.

The office of the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice is of critical importance in the forgoing regard and the President’s choice for that office would signal to all and sundry if he really desires that Nigeria’s judicial system recaptures the confidence of all within and outside the country. It is the position of the Ben Nwabueze Center that the office is not for anyone whose only major qualification is party or personal loyalty to the President as seems to have been the case in recent past, nor should the pool of possible appointees be restricted to any category of lawyers. For example, Prince Bola Ajibola KBE who is generally acknowledged as the most impactful Attorney-General of the Nigerian Federation in the past forty years was not a Senior Advocate at the time of his appointment.

In making the process more transparent, list of the candidates for judicial appointments who survive the last filtration hurdle should be published to the general public for comments on their overall fitness, intellectual and character wise. It is noteworthy that some judges had been formally reprimanded or retired for “poor knowledge of the law” or such deficiency. Such judges did not suddenly develop the deficiency upon appointment to the bench and it would have been observable ever before by those who had close contact with the quality of his work as a lawyer or lower ranking judge; whether as professional colleagues and lay persons alike. Similarly, the integrity or otherwise of the would-be judge must have been known by some people, just like those of weak character likely to be influenced by spousal pressures, traditional rulers and religious leaders and others in inherently influential positions. If it is deemed necessary for the list of those for elevation to the rank of Senior Advocates of Nigeria to be widely publicized for due notice to the general public, as is presently the case, then it is even more so for the judge whose work profoundly affects the entire society.

Senator Bulkachuwa’s confession is unquestionably a low-water mark for the Nigerian judiciary; is a ready, timeless, whip for those convinced of its exemplification of the Charles Dickens Court of Chancery, of which all honest practitioners would counsel that the aggrieved bears whatever grievance he has suffered rather than approach it for redress. The current thinking in the global commercial strongholds like New York, London and indeed the entire global West is that Nigerian courts should be avoided like the plague, with anti-suit injunctions in appropriate cases readily granted by courts in those jurisdictions against parties inclined to litigate in Nigeria.

Frustratingly for the concerned regulatory authorities, however, their remedial options are limited. Apart from the remote possibility of the losers in individual cases in which she was alleged to have negatively influenced seeking some civil redress, it is difficult seeing much that the concerned authorities and major stakeholders can do in bringing Senator Bulkachuwa and his wife to book beyond issuing the strongest condemnations. Justice Bulkachuwa has retired and is no longer answerable to the National Judicial Council.

However, the incident should serve as a wake-up call, if at all any was needed, for an urgent and sincere reset of the Nigerian judicial system to make it fit for purpose.

CHIJIOKE OKOLI, SAN

Co-ordinator,

Ben Nwabueze Center for Constitutional Studies & Rule of Law.

June 15, 2023.

With the National Assembly now inaugurated, Nigerians are eagerly awaiting the announcement of President Bola Tinubu's cabinet, creating a sense of anticipation throughout the country. The nation eagerly awaits the impact of the cabinet's composition on the acceleration of governance processes, as the public closely monitors political developments.

The political landscape has become increasingly complex, with reports indicating that certain figures previously rumoured to be among Tinubu's prospective ministerial candidates have now been selected by the President to serve as his special advisers.

The President made an announcement on Thursday regarding the release of a list comprising of eight Special Advisers.

Reports indicate that the individual in question had secured the support of twelve Senate Special Advisers prior to the recent developments.

The recent appointment of Special Advisers, who simultaneously serve as members of the federal cabinet, has sparked inquiries into the power structure of the government. The reason behind this is that the ministers, who occupy high-ranking positions within the cabinet, wield significant influence over the government's Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs). The statement implies the possibility of an ongoing power tussle within the government, with certain personalities wielding greater sway than their counterparts.

As per the statutory provisions, Tinubu is bound to disclose the composition of his cabinet within a span of 60 days from his inauguration on May 29th. The Senate confirmation process awaits the list for its consideration.

In a noteworthy development, it has been reported that the former President, Muhammed Buhari, affixed his signature to 16 constitutional bills in March of 2023. One of the bills presented was a mandate for the President to establish their cabinet within a two-month period after taking office. The recent development has sparked inquiries into the events that transpired prior to the enactment of these bills and the potential ramifications of this specific legislation on the nation's political terrain.

The failure of President Buhari to promptly appoint ministers during his initial tenure in 2015 has raised concerns among political analysts who contend that it had a detrimental effect on governance in the early stages of his administration. The President's announcement of his cabinet, which came six months after his inauguration, has drawn criticism for its potential adverse effects.

As the Senate convened on Tuesday, political analysts have been speculating that a major political manoeuvre could be imminent. Speculations are rife that Tinubu is gearing up to present his ministerial roster to the Upper Chamber of the National Assembly for ratification. If executed expeditiously, this move could potentially indicate the President's readiness to confront the daunting task of enhancing the well-being of Nigerians who have endured destitution during the prior regime.

According to sources with privileged access to Aso Rock Presidential Villa, the ministerial list is purportedly in the works and may soon be forwarded to the Senate for ratification, Sunday Vanguard can report. Sources close to the matter have indicated that a potential deadline for the formation of the cabinet could be slated for the month of July.

In the wake of Tinubu's victory in the February 25, 2023 election, insiders have revealed that a flurry of lobbying efforts are underway to secure key ministerial appointments. According to sources, the lobbyists have been swift in their endeavours. Amidst the political buzz, the media has been abuzz with the names of several politicians and technocrats who are being considered as potential nominees. However, the identity of the individuals being targeted by these lobbyists remains shrouded in mystery.

According to sources, the website in question reportedly features a native ad placement identified by the alphanumeric identifier "ad_placement_native" and a data display index of 4. According to sources, the advertisement has reportedly been processed and is being managed by Vanguard Ad Manager. 

Reports have emerged of a purported list of potential nominees for a yet-to-be-disclosed position. The list reportedly includes the names of several former governors, namely Muhammad Badaru of Jigawa, Atiku Badaru of Kebbi, Raji Fashola of Lagos, Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti, Bello Matawalle of Zamfara, Nyesom Wike of Rivers, Gboyega Oyetola of Osun, Ibikunle Amosun of Ogun, and Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna. The purpose of this list and the position it pertains to remain shrouded in secrecy at this time.

According to recent reports by investigative journalists, former ministers including Festus Keyamo, Isa Pantami, and Femi Fani-Kayode have been mentioned in connection with the matter at hand.

According to sources, a purported ministerial roster has been circulating, featuring the names of Kachifu Inuwa, Tanimu Yakubu, Hadiza Bala Usman, Hanatu Musawa, Betty Edu, and Rt. Hon. Dimeji Bankole.

Reports have surfaced indicating that the Constitution permits the appointment of a solitary minister per state, potentially resulting in a grand total of 36 ministers, encompassing both ministers and ministers of state.

Speculations are rife that a few personalities are advocating for the formation of a national unity government, which would involve affording the opposition factions a voice in the cabinet.

The Tinubu Campaign has swiftly rejected the proposal that was presented.

As the 2023 elections draw near, political factors are poised to play a pivotal role in the selection of ministerial nominees. In states governed by the All Progressives Congress (APC), the governors are expected to wield significant influence in the selection process. Conversely, in states where the APC is not in power, speculation abounds that unsuccessful governorship candidates and party leaders may exert their sway in determining the appointment of ministers.

According to an exclusive report by Sunday Vanguard, there are indications that the governors of the All Progressives Congress (APC) have received a directive to provide a list of three names from each state. It is believed that the President has been granted sole discretion to choose one of the nominees to serve as a minister.

Recent reports suggest that there are intriguing developments in the purported ministerial nominations. Sources reveal that certain individuals, who are speculated to be potential nominees, have been appointed as Special Advisers by Tinubu. This development has sparked inquiries into the nature of their potential roles in the government and the implications of their appointment as Special Advisers for their chances of being nominated as ministers. Further investigation is required to ascertain the complete narrative behind these appointments and what they may divulge about the inner workings of the government.

In a recent development, the government has announced the appointment of two individuals to crucial positions. Mr. Dele Alake has been appointed as the Special Adviser for Special Duties, Communications, and Strategy, while Mr. Wale Edun has been appointed as the Special Adviser for Monetary Policies.

According to insider sources, there are indications that Alake and Edun are being considered as potential candidates for ministerial positions. Alake's name has been linked to the Information Ministry, while Edun is reportedly being considered for the Finance Ministry.

As per an undisclosed informant, it has been put forth that a Special Adviser may have initially turned down the role owing to their desire for a ministerial portfolio. The source alleges that the said individual required considerable persuasion before ultimately agreeing to take up the position. Additional inquiry is warranted to authenticate the veracity of these assertions.

According to a source, the identities of those with access to the ministerial list remain undisclosed. It seems that the President is the exclusive keeper of this list, and only a limited number of individuals within Tinubu's inner circle have been authorised to view it.

As per the source, individuals asserting to possess the list presently are not being veracious.

‘Strangers’

Over the weekend, investigative reports from multiple states have revealed a palpable sense of apprehension among APC members with regards to the upcoming ministerial selection. According to sources, there is a prevailing sentiment among party loyalists that ministerial positions should only be filled by individuals who are considered authentic party members. The current mood appears to indicate that any deviation from this established norm could potentially result in unfavourable outcomes for the APC.

The government of Ondo state has issued a statement regarding their recent misfortunes. The matter requires further scrutiny to ascertain the underlying factors behind the declaration.

The political climate in Ondo State is currently shrouded in mystery, as Governor Rotimi Akeredolu remains absent from his post due to a medical vacation overseas. Reports indicate that the governor's closest advisors, particularly those hailing from his hometown of Owo, may be playing a role in the lack of openness surrounding his condition.

According to exclusive information obtained from investigative sources, it has been revealed that Tinubu has made a request for every governor to submit three names from their respective states for ministerial positions.

According to insider reports, a group of individuals allegedly linked to prominent officials, such as Ambassador Olusola Iji, APC National Vice Chairman for the South West, Hon Isaac Kekemeke, Director of the Humanitarian and Social Directorate of APC for the South West during the February election, Chief Alex Ajipe, former Minister of State for Transport, Demola Adegoroye, and former Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Victor Olabimtan, are reportedly vying for the Ondo ministerial pos

According to Steve Otaloro, the Director of Media & Publicity for the state's political party, in an exclusive interview, Ondo State has a track record of misfortune in securing junior ministerial positions.

It seems that certain individuals who have benefited from the circumstances may not have the state's best interests in mind, save for the former Minister of Transport.

Political reporter version: The recent news of former state ministers distancing themselves from their political party has raised questions about their intentions and potential impact on the party's members and the state.

The party's recent statement has raised questions regarding the identity of the individual being appointed and their alignment with the party's objectives. Concerns have been expressed regarding the individual's affiliations and their ability to uphold the state's interests.

promote the governor's re-election campaign, but insiders suggest that they are engaging in behind-the-scenes efforts to garner support for his candidature. The governor's camp has yet to comment on these reports.

According to sources within the Osun State party, there are indications that the available slot may be reserved for the former Governor, Gboyega Oyetola. Nevertheless, reports have emerged indicating that Oyetola is not actively pursuing the position.

According to sources, the fate of the party hung in the balance as supporters of a certain individual purportedly lobbied for his candidature. These same sources indicate that the group may perceive Governor Oyetola's close relationship with the President as a possible advantage.

As per an undisclosed high-ranking member of the party, the leadership will be working in conjunction with the Elders Caucus, led by Chief Bisi Akande, to determine the allocation of the state ministerial position.

According to insider reports, a number of prominent party leaders are currently competing for the position, among them former Minister of Health Professor Isaac Adewole, immediate past Senate spokesperson Dr. Ajibola Basiru, Fani-Kayode, and former Commissioner for Finance in the state Bola Oyebamiji. It has also been suggested that Oyetola himself may be in the running.

In a recent development, Kola Olabisi, the APC Director of Media and Publicity, has issued a statement regarding the party's position on the appointment of a minister. Olabisi has asserted that the party is in unison on the issue and there is no room for discord within the APC in Osun.

Speculations are rife that a fresh entrant may be making a foray into the political arena of Ekiti. The latest developments indicate the possibility of a new player seeking to assert their influence and vie for power.

A political power struggle seems to be brewing in Ekiti State as a number of individuals are reportedly competing for a highly sought-after ministerial position. The contenders include Chief Niyi Adebayo, a former Minister of Trade, Industry and Investment, Senator Dayo Adeyeye, who serves as the National Coordinator of South-West Agenda for Tinubu 2023, Prince Akintade Olayisade, who coordinates the Tinubu/ Shettima Independent Campaign Council in Ekiti, and the incumbent Governor of the state, Dr. Kayode Fayemi.

Following a comprehensive inquiry, it has come to light that the Ekiti ministerial position has garnered the interest of three notable figures. These individuals are Fayemi, Adeyeye, and Makinde Araoye, a relatively fresh entrant to the political arena but has forged robust ties within Aso Rock.

The Deputy Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ekiti State, Mr Sola Eleshin, recently granted an exclusive interview where he addressed the ongoing issue. According to Mr Eleshin, the party is deeply invested in any development that would be advantageous to the state. He reiterated that the party had previously outlined its prerequisites during the National Assembly elections and that the same standards apply to the ministerial position. Additionally, Mr Eleshin revealed that the

Speculation is rife as to whether members of Governor Makinde's team are angling for a reward from OYO state.

Sources within Oyo State have reported that there are indications of a political development involving Bola Tinubu and Governor Seyi Makinde. It is believed that Tinubu may have granted Makinde the opportunity to present his preferred candidates. This move follows the involvement of the G-5 Governors, of which Tinubu was a member, in Makinde's successful bid for governorship.

Recent reports indicate that both the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) are actively engaged in submitting candidates for approval to the President. The situation warrants further investigation to ascertain the underlying motives and potential ramifications of this development.

According to sources, the governor's faction put up a formidable challenge against the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC).

According to insider sources, a notable trend is emerging among party loyalists who believe that they should be the primary beneficiaries of the rewards stemming from their contributions towards securing Governor Makinde's re-election.
As per an undisclosed informant, representatives of the political party are strongly refuting any insinuations of potential involvement in actions that could confer advantages to third parties through their diligent efforts.

In response to the statement, the APC's state representative, Mr. Olawale Sadare, lauded President Bola Tinubu as a genuine leader.

According to insider reports, there appears to be a significant degree of positivity surrounding the potential nomination of staunch party supporters for crucial roles, such as ministerial positions.

a political showdown is looming in Ondo State as heavyweight political figures including Bankole, Amosun, and Gbenga Daniel are reportedly jostling for power. The details of this power struggle are yet to be fully ascertained, but the situation is tense and could potentially have far-reaching implications for the state's political landscape.

The Governor of Ogun State, Dapo Abiodun, has yet to reveal the identity of his nominee for the gubernatorial position, leaving the public in a state of uncertainty.

Insider reports indicate that Ibikunle Amosun, a former Governor who allegedly withdrew from the party primary to support Tinubu, and Dimeji Bankole, a former Speaker of the House of Representatives, are among the prominent party figures competing for ministerial roles.

The political manoeuvring for the coveted slot is not exclusive to Abiodun's faction, as even the camp of Otunba Gbenga Daniel, who had a falling out with Abiodun during the gubernatorial race, is also a participant.

Sources privy to the matter have disclosed that there are murmurs making rounds regarding the potential appointment of either Amosun or an individual from Gbenga Daniel's inner circle to the esteemed state ministerial position. This conjecture has surfaced in the wake of Daniel's recent triumph in the senatorial elections, where he emerged victorious as the representative of Ogun East.

As per Tunde Oladunjoye, the Publicity Secretary of the APC in Ogun State, the current matter under discussion is an internal affair of the party.
Sources have reported that Oladunjoye has issued a statement regarding the formation of the cabinet. The statement indicates that strict adherence to the rules and regulations outlined in the country's Constitution will be observed during the process. However, specific measures to ensure compliance with the Constitution have not been disclosed at this time.

The question remains: is this gathering truly a mere celebration, or is there a deeper narrative at play? The subject's adherence to legal regulations is also under scrutiny. At present, the subject has opted to withhold additional details. Interestingly, the subject invoked a well-known proverb cautioning against the premature disclosure of a partner's pregnancy, stating that one should "wait until the delivery time."

According to sources in Anambra state, the political landscape is currently dominated by bona fide members of the political party. However, the veracity of these assertions requires further scrutiny and investigation.

The Anambra State Chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has purportedly initiated a drive to guarantee that ministerial and other appointments from the state are exclusively reserved for authentic members of the party.

According to Dr. Valentine Oliobi, the state Publicity Secretary of the APC, Anambra may be facing a possible recurrence of past events. Specifically, during the Buhari administration, Anambra officials who held ministerial positions failed to align themselves with the party. This has raised concerns about the potential ramifications of a similar situation arising in the future.

According to the source, the proposal to appoint ministers from among the party's supporters is aimed at motivating members to invest their resources in the party's activities.

Oliobi has reported that there exist certain individuals within the APC in Anambra who are deemed authentic members and are being put forth for ministerial positions.

As the appointment of a new ambassador to an undisclosed location looms, political circles are abuzz with speculation about the possible candidates. Among the names being bandied about are Elijah Onyeagba, the current Nigerian Ambassador to Burundi, and Jerry Ugokwe, a former member of the House of Representatives. Also in the mix is Chief Johnbosco Onunkwo, a former governorship aspirant, and Uzuegbunam Okagbue, a former chief protocol officer to ex-Governor Willie Obiano. The decision on who will be appointed is eagerly awaited by political observers.

Is Onoh emerging as the frontrunner in Enugu?

According to recent findings by investigative journalists, a number of individuals are currently being considered as potential candidates for political positions in Enugu State. Among these individuals are Dr. Josef Onoh, who previously held the position of spokesman for Tinubu in the South-East, Dr. Ben Nwoye, a former Chairman of the APC in the state, Chief Uche Nnaji, who ran for governor in 2023, and Sullivan Chime, a former governor of the state.

Reports have emerged indicating that Senator Ken Nnamani and former Speaker of the state Assembly, Eugene Odoh, were being considered as potential nominees for the APC in Enugu state. However, insider sources have disclosed that their insubordination towards the party leadership in Enugu led to their conspicuous absence from Tinubu's campaign in the state.

Currently, it seems that Onoh is in a favourable position, owing to their vocal endorsement of Tinubu in the South-Eastern part of the country.

Factors

In a recent development, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and activists have issued a statement concerning the constitution of Tinubu's cabinet. They have called upon him to exhibit impartiality in the selection process.

According to insider sources, there are mounting calls for the President to exercise greater discretion in his choice of cabinet members. The Federal Executive Council has come under fire for allegedly transforming into a dumping ground for failed political aspirants.

As reported by Sunday Vanguard, a number of groups and activists have voiced their apprehensions regarding the present condition of Nigeria. They have pointed fingers at the insufficient guidance provided by the ruling authorities. The sources have recommended that the selection of cabinet members should be based on their ethical standards, level of proficiency, and prior experiences.

Renowned legal expert, Mike Ozekhome, has reportedly voiced his dissent towards the present government helmed by President Muhammadu Buhari, whom he has derogatorily dubbed 'Baba Go-slow'.

Constitutional lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Mike Ozekhome, has recently made a noteworthy revelation regarding the political aspirations of Tinubu. Ozekhome asserts that Tinubu's success in improving the lives of Nigerians is contingent upon the immediate formation of his cabinet. The urgency of Ozekhome's statement is palpable, prompting speculation as to the underlying reasons for such haste.

As per the statement, the election of Tinubu occurred in February and he was declared victorious on March 1. However, questions arise regarding the efficiency of his cabinet formation prior to his inauguration, which may have resulted in a delay in his ability to govern effectively. Further investigation is necessary to verify the claim that the presidential system in use was borrowed from the United States and to analyse its potential impact on the political landscape. The urgency of the situation cannot be overstated, and prompt action is required to achieve any significant progress. This is in contrast to the approach taken by President Buhari, who famously delayed the formation of his cabinet for almost six months after taking office, earning him the moniker 'baba go-slow'.

As Nigeria confronts a host of challenges, the President's tardiness in assembling his cabinet has become a growing concern. The nation is presently in a state of disarray, with citizens contending with dire circumstances such as hunger, disease, and squalor. According to reports, some have even resorted to extreme measures such as suicide, homicide, and infanticide due to their frustration and deep-seated anger. The pressing question on the lips of many is: why is the President dragging his feet, and what will be the ramifications if this state of affairs persists?

The President's call for the appointment of technocrats has raised questions about the specific qualifications and expertise required to address Nigeria's pressing issues. The weighty issues at stake in Nigeria today demand specialised knowledge, and it remains to be seen who will be selected for these important positions. Critics have raised concerns about the use of recycled and old political figures, questioning whether this approach has led to catastrophic outcomes. President Buhari's reliance on this particular group has been described as disastrous and abysmal by some.

Political reporter: According to Agbakoba's statement, it appears that there are multiple factors involved.
Renowned for its meticulous and impartial approach to news coverage, investigative journalism has once again come to the fore. This time, the focus is on Olisa Agbakoba, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, who has made a statement concerning the formation of a cabinet by Tinubu. Agbakoba has opined that while it is imperative for Tinubu to expeditiously form his cabinet, he is still operating within a reasonable timeframe.

The President's delay in appointing his team has raised questions among political analysts. While the intricacies of politics are well-known, some speculate that there may be other factors at play. Sources report that an individual is conducting a thorough investigation into the selection process for cabinet members. The focus appears to be on identifying individuals with the necessary skills and expertise to serve in these crucial positions, while also considering various political factors. While it remains to be seen if all issues have been resolved, the source claims that the cabinet will be finalised this week. However, further investigation is required to verify these assertions. Agbakoba has suggested that prompt establishment of a capable team may be in the best interest of all parties involved.

As the President considers the appointment of ministers, sources suggest that competence should be the foremost factor in his decision-making process. The question arises as to which top professionals from various fields should be appointed to these positions. The issue of competency driving government policies is also raised. The crucial question that remains unanswered is whether the appointees possess the necessary competence to effectively execute their assigned tasks.

In a political development, Sir Victor Uwaifo, a celebrated musician, has issued a stern warning to those who may be contemplating flouting the directives of Nigerian President, Muhammadu Buhari. In a recent press release, Uwaifo sounded a note of caution.

In a recent development, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Hannibal Uwaifo, has cautioned Tinubu against replicating the actions of his predecessor, Buhari, by delaying the constitution of his cabinet. Uwaifo has underscored the significance of the president assembling his team without further delay, citing that it would be in the nation's best interest.

In response to a question regarding the timing of a particular event, the individual expressed a sense of urgency, emphasising the need for prompt action. This suggests that there may be a pressing matter that requires immediate attention. The current state of the nation is widely recognised as dire, with the previous administration, despite being affiliated with the current president's political party, being viewed as a colossal disappointment. The president appears to be keen on distancing his government from the policies of his predecessor, and any action in this direction is being readily embraced. Uwaifo, a prominent figure, has made a statement regarding the formation of the president's cabinet, indicating that it will be constituted as early as tomorrow morning. However, further investigation is required to verify the accuracy of this claim.

The investigation into the formation of the Nigerian administration must prioritise an examination of the challenges faced by the new administration and the endemic issues in the country. The appointment of suitable individuals for specific roles is crucial to the success of the administration. The delay in the formation of the cabinet is a pressing concern. Sources indicate that the president may be planning to form his team in June, but further investigation is needed to confirm this claim. The president faces a deadline of June 29 to complete this task, and it remains to be seen whether he will be able to meet this deadline.

According to insider sources, a prominent figure has issued a strong statement, calling on the President to prioritise the appointment of technocrats over politicians in order to tackle the numerous challenges confronting the nation. Further inquiry is required to ascertain the rationale behind this appeal. Will the President steer clear of appointing individuals with religious or ethnic biases? If not, could this potentially exacerbate the already existing polarisation within the country?

According to recent investigative journalism, Monday Ubani, a former Vice-President of the Nigerian Bar Association, has weighed in on the legality of Tinubu's actions. Ubani has asserted that Tinubu's actions fall within the legal boundaries, as the President is granted a two-month window to establish his cabinet.

A new law has been passed, stipulating that the President is required to form his team within a two-month timeframe. The question at hand is whether there is a strict time limit of two months for the appointment of a cabinet by the individual in question. Further investigation is required to determine the validity of this claim. Since his inauguration, he has been actively engaged in his duties and has successfully appointed nearly all of his advisors. According to legal statutes, he has a period of two months. What was the reason behind the delay in constituting the cabinet by the former President who stayed in office for six months? The individual in question is expected to make an appointment in a timely manner. As an investigative journalist, it is crucial to examine the actions of the cabinet in meeting the needs of Nigerians. How exactly are they ensuring that the needs of the people are being met? What steps are being taken to address the concerns of the citizens? These are important questions that require further investigation and analysis.

Ugochimereze Chinedu Asuzu, the Convener of Ikoro Ndigbo, has lauded the actions of Tinubu in his recent selection of team members. Asuzu has expressed his admiration for Tinubu's ability to appoint key individuals to significant positions within the first week of his inauguration, including Special Advisers. Asuzu has suggested that Tinubu's efforts thus far are deserving of commendation.

The enigmatic phrase "No to padi padi" has been generating buzz within select circles. Additional inquiry is required to ascertain the connotation and import of this expression.

The National Coordinator and Activist for Good Governance, Mr. Declan Ihekaire, recently shared his expectations for the government in an exclusive interview. He underscored the significance of good governance and equitable treatment of the populace. Mr. Ihekaire also voiced apprehensions that the government's "Renewed Hope" initiative could exacerbate the already existing suffering and adversity experienced by the masses.

According to recent findings by an investigative journalist, there are growing concerns surrounding the potential appointees of the subject in question. Ongoing monitoring efforts are specifically targeting individuals with questionable character. Critics have suggested that the current administration's "padi padi" approach to governance has had detrimental effects on the nation. As a result, it is imperative that any appointments made prioritise individuals of good character and intentions for the betterment of the country.

In the realm of political journalism, it is incumbent upon us to thoroughly examine the motives of those who may be selected for cabinet positions. It is of utmost importance to pinpoint those who place the interests of the public above their own financial gain. A desirable candidate would be forthcoming in disclosing their assets prior to and following their time in office, in accordance with the Code of Conduct. It is imperative to steer clear of individuals who may seek recompense for their campaign donations, as this could potentially undermine their capacity to serve the public good.

The possibility of defeated gubernatorial candidates receiving ministerial appointments is a matter of concern that warrants further investigation.

According to the speaker, the implication is that if an individual were a strong contender for the governorship, their constituents would have cast their ballots in favour of them. The citizen has conveyed a sentiment of discontent towards the cabinet members and insinuates that their efficacy may be lacking as a consequence.

Speculations are rife regarding the President's purported capacity to identify technocrats. The evolving political landscape has brought to light a notable shift in the persona of Tinubu, as compared to his past self. It is crucial to recognise that Lagos State cannot be regarded as a representative of the entire nation.

The size of Nigeria is a topic of interest, with many seeking to understand the landmass of this West African nation. As the politician extends his influence beyond Lagos, the challenge of identifying capable candidates becomes increasingly formidable. The enormity of Nigeria poses a formidable obstacle in pinpointing proficient technocrats who lack any political party affiliation. The intricate process of selection is beset by a plethora of factors that necessitate careful consideration.

Compensation
According to Mr. Olufemi Lawson, the National President of Campaign for Democracy, in an interview with Sunday Vanguard, the naming process of the President's cabinet is now subject to a rigorous timeline, which is a departure from the practises of previous administrations. As a political reporter, it is noteworthy to mention that the subject under scrutiny, President Tinubu, boasts a track record as a former governor and is widely regarded as a high achiever. Anticipation is high as it is expected that the individual in question will meticulously choose capable aides to assist in driving the nation forward towards advancement.

After a thorough analysis of the current state of the country, it is evident that the existing conditions do not justify any political remuneration or favouritism.

In light of the prevailing climate of instability and financial hardship, the country is in urgent need of capable individuals who can assist the President in charting a course towards a more prosperous future. The current administration's inherited burden demands individuals with requisite qualities, according to sources.

As the nation eagerly awaits the announcement of President Tinubu's cabinet, many are wondering if he will take certain factors into consideration during the selection process. According to the speaker, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) must be comprised of individuals who not only possess professional competence but also demonstrate sound moral character.

As per the investigative journalist, scrutinising the political appointments made by parties holds utmost significance. There are allegations that certain positions are being utilised as a form of patronage for party loyalists, rather than being staffed by qualified personnel, according to sources. The statement raises questions regarding the equity and efficacy of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The pressing matter at hand is to scrutinise whether these appointments are grounded on qualifications or affiliations with political entities.

As a political reporter, it is crucial to scrutinise the remarks made by the individual. As per the user's statement, the President is currently confronted with a pivotal choice that necessitates him to place the welfare of the nation above the concerns of his political faction. The individual in question has underscored the importance of prioritising the welfare of the nation, and has called upon the President to make a decision that is in accordance with this fundamental principle.

Is it within the realm of possibility that he holds the power to sway his political faction towards acknowledging the imperative need for individuals who possess the requisite expertise to implement the 'Renewed Hope' initiative and drive the country forward?

Amidst the ongoing appointment of the Federal Executive Council (FEC), ministerial positions, and other key positions, the question arises as to whether the principle of federal character is being upheld. As per the investigative journalist, it is crucial to highlight that the concerned person is obligated by the constitutional decree and hence, must comply with its stipulations.

The pressing inquiry is whether the said person has the requisite acumen to tackle the prevailing issues confronting the nation, especially in the wake of the division that ensued under the prior government.

The reporter seeks to uncover the individual's professional and personal history that showcases their expertise and vitality. Additional inquiry is required to ascertain the scope of their proficiency and vigour in their respective field.

The President of Women Arise for Change Initiative, Dr. Joe Okei-Odumakin, has weighed in on the appointment of ministers in Nigeria, according to a recent statement. According to the source, the Constitution prioritises regional diversity over qualifications, despite the fact that a blend of expertise and vigour would be preferable. In a move aimed at achieving a balance between representation and capability, it has been announced that ministers will be selected from all 36 states.

Fast-track
Democratic reforms advocate, Mr. Ezenwa Nwagwu, was in attendance and expressed his perspective.

According to sources, the President is anticipated to accelerate the process of ministerial appointments in light of the urgent matters that demand prompt action, as stated by an investigative journalist. A pressing concern in the current political climate is the reluctance of trade unions to enter into talks with representatives who they argue lack the requisite authority.

The question at hand is whether the Constitution of our nation bars the formation of a personality cult. Amidst growing concerns over security measures, questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of a one-month timeframe for conducting thorough security checks. Can you elaborate on the actions taken by the President to safeguard the nation's security? The pressing inquiry that emerges is whether he will place greater emphasis on fealty to the political faction or on aptitude and a verified history of capability.