Admin

Admin

"AT least 80 children have been abducted by bandits in the Tsafe Local Government Area of Zamfara State.
The children, who are between the ages of 12 and 17, were kidnapped on Friday morning, according to BBC Hausa. /Some parents of the abducted children who spoke to the British media outlet said the victims were in the bush fetching firewood at about 8am when the assailants rounded them up and marched them into the forest." - The Punch, 8 April, 2023
 
"FORTY-SIX persons were reportedly killed on Wednesday as suspected armed herders unleashed a deadly attack on the Umogidi community of Entekpa Adoka district in the Otukpo Local Government Area of Benue State. The fresh attack came a day after suspected herders invaded the community and killed three persons on Tuesday. /On Monday, the Igbobi community in the neighbouring Apa Local Government Area of the state was also attacked, with three persons killed./It was gathered that the armed herders returned to the Umogidi community on Wednesday evening, shortly after the burial of the three persons earlier killed in the Tuesday attack." - The Punch, 7 April, 2023
 
THE above reports of serious security breaches in two Nigerian states indicate that nothing has changed in terms of our security challenges as the swearing-in of our next president is less than seven weeks away. Within the past six days, the Benue figure has risen to 136!
 
ELSEWHERE, any of the two reports would be a cause for a broadcast by the Head of State to calm horrified citizens, in which he would detail actions taken already to rescue the 80 school children abducted in Zamfara and apprehend the killers of the 136 compatriots in Benue. 
 
MEANWHILE, a battery of media operatives would be at the scenes of crime, giving a steady stream of live reports under the rubric of "Breaking News" or "Developing Story".
 
BUT here in our bloody Nigeria, these are no longer Breaking News. They are Normal News. In Benue, for instance, as at February, Governor Samuel Ortom had put the figures of those killed by so-called Fulani herdsmen at 6,000, while, earlier, he gave 1.5 million as the figure for Internally Displaced People in the state occasioned by the same gang of unrelenting assailants. 
 
WHAT is clear from the foregoing is that there are forces entrenched within the political class, particularly in the North of Nigeria, promoting insecurity. Or, how do we explain a situation where a truce of sorts enveloped the election period, only for hostilities to resume upon the conclusion of the elections?
 
SOME people who are stakeholders in the election obviously wanted it to go on without the encumbrance of insecurity. They wanted maximum turnout of voters. That achieved, they've now resumed the orgy of killings and abductions. 
 
UNLESS the shadow actors in the promotion of insecurity are dealt with, the incoming president might labour in vain in fighting the scourge. President Tinubu must wake up early enough to the palpable reality of saboteurs in high places within the political and security circles. Not only to tackle insecurity decisively, but for his own safety. There's fire on the Aso villa mountain! We need to hasten to make this point bordering on intelligence analysis before delving into technical issues.
 
SO, the task before our incoming president, beyond the charms of the presidency, are indeed perilous. And the question is: what new thing has he got up his sleeves to put a quick and lasting end to these unwarranted butchery and immiseration of innocent Nigerians?
 
IT would be 40 years in three years time one became a political science undergraduate. We were taught at that level that the fundamental duty of a state (or government) is the protection of lives and properties of citizens. In Thomas Hobbes classic "The Leviathan", we were informed that anarchy was the order of the day before the emergence of government. Hobbes said in that state of anarchy he termed "State of Nature", there was "no mine nor thine". In other words, whatever you thought belonged to you could be taken from you by someone stronger than you. 
 
THUS, "life was brutish, nasty, and short"! Life was so intolerable that men summoned a summit of reason, whereupon they agreed it was in the best interest of all to surrender their reckless show of power to the authority of a superior who would manage their affairs in such a manner that none would be injurious to the other, and would mete due punishment to whosoever disturbed public order.
 
IT is against this philosophical tenet regarding the essence of the state that under the United Nations system, despite the non-interference clause in the UN Charter, sister nations are authorised under the auspices of the Security Council, to intervene militarily in nations where the government is no longer able to protect lives and property. That is the doctrine of "Responsibility to Protect".
 
A young military officer told me some years ago that if not that Nigeria was a big country, the magnitude of deaths and destruction he had witnessed in some  states in Nigeria were enough to call on the UN to intervene. But Nigeria is bigger than Sierra Leone or Somalia. We can afford to lose citizens by thousands in a state, while reassuring the world that ours is still a safe and stable country because the reports they're getting are isolated cases. We even berate our local media for reporting too much of such news. We charge them to report things like the completion of the Second Niger Bridge, the rice revolution occasioned by the Central Bank's Anchor Borrowers' Programme,  the imminent takeoff of Air Nigeria, upcoming Dangote Refinery (Africa's largest) etc. And so on.
 
TO those of us into security studies, the fact that there is hardly a state in Nigeria today in which the military isn't engaged in Internal Security Operations (that is, police duties), underscores the seriousness of our security situation. 
 
THAT got me interested in the  security agenda of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Much earlier, I had concluded it's more of a long-term plan. But we need urgent measures to save lives!
 
THEREFORE, I wish to share some of the measures I had put down as quick-fix approaches to tackling insecurity. 
 
THE first is CIVIL MOBILISATION FOR SELF-DEFENCE. This entails training vigilantes in vulnerable communities in such states as Zamfara, Sokoto, Niger, Benue, Taraba Kaduna and others in the use of assault rifles germane to countering the firepower of sundry bandits and terrorists laying siege on their homelands. 
 
I'M talking about defensive training to protect and defend their communities and farms against hostile forces. They are no substitutes to the military or the police or allied security agencies. Their task is to provide the first layer of resistance to hostile forces before help would arrive from the police or the military. This will put an end to a situation where their communities are invaded and people are picked up like snails on a rainy night in the forest. Or, stout and sturdy men get slaughtered by some lightweight urchins from the Sahel.
 
THE vigilantes shall comprise young men and women screened and certified as good indigenes of their communities by their local authorities. They will be organised into platoons and their job shall be a freewill service to their communities, while they keep their regular vocation. And while they need not be paid by the government, the government shall provide them with training via the nearest military formation to their community. The template of the Civilian JTF in Borno state is akin to what I'm recommending.
 
THE second measure is the STRENGHTENING OF STATE -OWNED SECURITY OUTFITS like Amotekun in the Southwest states, Benue Volunteer Guards, Ebube Agu in the Southeast, and similar outfits established in the states as self-help security machinery. Help them by way of approving the use of weapons commensurate or superior to what the armed groups ravaging their peace carry. Help them with logistics and training  where required and so on.
 
THE foregoing are low-hanging fruits in the context in which we acknowledge that the regular security forces controlled by the Federal Government have been overwhelmed by hydra-headed spate of insecurity. 
 
THE second measure is RECALL OF RESERVISTS. This is still part of immediate measures. The reservists are those military, police, and security personnel who are in retirement but are still mentally and physically agile enough to return to active service. Again, the recall process shall be voluntary and it shall entail fitness test. The service will not be free because these are people who had already served and paid their dues to our country. They will be entitled to some honoraria. The aims of their recall are as follows: to beef up the numerical strength of our forces and agencies where paucity of personnel has been a chronic challenge, and to make an infusion of experts in counterterrorism operations. 
 
ON the latter score, I once supervised an army general who graduated with a PhD in Strategic Studies seven years ago. The title of his thesis was "The Challenges of Combating Terrorism in the Sahel Region of Africa". In researching this thesis, he undertook fieldwork in Niger Republic, Chad, Burkina Faso, and, of course, the northern part of Nigeria. Subsequently, he was appointed GOC 8 Division, Sokoto, and, later, Commander of the Multi-National Joint Task Force (MNJTF), N'djamena, Chad, among others. He's below 60 but already retired. There are scores upon scores of his kind now teaching on our campuses or working abroad as mercenaries who should be recalled, if need be, as contracted mercenaries, to avail us their invaluable skills in ending insecurity so the incoming president can concentrate on executing his development agenda. 
 
TO avoid the trouble of seniority in dealing with their juniors now in command positions, I prefer the experts should be engaged as mercenaries such that they can request for a team to work with in the military under their own command. And they should be given specific tasks. For example, the ubiquitous bandits that for a long time now have posed a greater challenge than Boko Haram or ISWAP should be effectively put of action in a proactive, intelligence-led nationwide operation. Governor Nasir El-Rufai has said several times they should be bombed. His views were captured in a report by The Nation (1st April 2022) titled "El-Rufai: It's time to bomb bandits out of existence". He's not alone, the Emir of Muri had had cause to call for their lynching, unless they left his territory. This was in the Sahara Reporters (22 July 2021) with the caption: "Emir Declares War On Fulani Herdsmen In Taraba, Gives 30-day Ultimatum To Vacate Forests".
 
DEALING decisively with the bandits is a core security imperative to Nigeria today 
because, unlike Boko Haram, they are able to penetrate the nooks and crannies of Nigeria under the dubious cover of "herdsmen". But the palpable reality, which many of them caught or sighted by victims have revealed, is that they are mostly foreigners from the Sahel. Not the Nigerian herdsmen. My colleague, Biodun Solola, abducted at the Omotoso axis of the Benin-Lagos highway on 26th April and released 1st May 2019 after paying ransom, told us his abductors spoke French. He noted emphatically they were not Nigerians. But that's not to rule out local collaborators. As a matter of fact, we have have seen cases where, when locals apprehend them and hand them over to security agencies, they are soon let off the hook by order from above!
 
I cite a prominent example. There was this notorious so-called Fulani herdsman known as Iskilu Wakilu. He was terrorising the farming communities of Ibarapa, Oyo state, killing, raping women, sacking whole communities, abducting for ransom etc. The command post of his terrorist operations was Kajola.
 
IT was in the heat of Sunday Igboho's entry into the fray in the Igangan axis of Oke Ogun where his kinsman, Dr. Fatai Aborode, had been abducted and killed after ransom was paid! People were deriding the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Chief Gani Adams, of complacency in the face of a siege on Yorubaland. Whereupon, he decided to prove his martial prowess and his care. He sent some of his men to capture the dreaded Iskilu Wakili alive. They got him, navigating an hailstorm of bullets. They triumphantly drove him to a police station in nearby Igbo Ora from where they moved to Police Force Headquarters at Iyaganku, Ibadan. To the shock of everyone, Iskilu was given a chair to sit upon like a VIP at the police headquarters, while his three captors who believed they just conducted citizens' arrest in aid of the police were locked up in cells for usurping police duties! They were even arraigned in court and were only released after languishing in detention. That was in early March 2021, but they were not discharged and acquitted by the court until June 2021. That was long after Iskilu had been released to go home in peace. The three OPC men were Awodele Adedigba, Dauda Kazeem, and Hassan Ramon. You can Google "Iskilu Wakili" for more on this bizarre story of promoters of insecurity in high places.
 
THE third measure President Tinubu must adopt is rather trite but valid: LAW ENFORCEMENT. Must ensure all bandits or terrorists arrested for criminality are prosecuted for the public to observe. People complain loudly that they rarely see anybody being prosecuted for all the killings and destruction of livelihoods raging in the country! This is another low-hanging fruit capable of deterrence. It will stem the tide of impunity. When the lawless, rampaging killer "herdsmen" see their mates standing trial and facing public execution for their crime against innocent Nigerians,  they will have a brain reset, whether they are foreigners or locals. As Martin Luther King Jnr puts the matter, "Judicial acts may not change the heart, but it will, at least, restrain the heartless"!
 
THE fourth measure is COMPULSORY RANCHING OF CATTLE. A holistic approach is needed. Hence, for the sake of genuine herdsmen caught between the pressure of diminishing grazing fields and the menace of cattle rustlers, the incoming Tinubu administration should revisit the politicised panacea called ranching. The issue couldn't be resolved because of President Buhari's divided loyalty as a former herdsboy. He had told us he was plucked from the grazing field by an uncle to go to school. His approach to the killer herdsmen menace had been riddled by bias and atavism. That's why the criminals became emboldened and utterly brazen in the acts.
 
IN an age the whole world has embraced ranching, the country watched in disbelief at different times when Buhari had pushed for opening up of grazing routes across Nigeria for herdsmen! He said they used to be there 60, 70 years ago! 
 
HIS alternative to nationwide grazing routes was nationwide "Ruga". Meaning,  acquiring vast acreages of land hither and thither as grazing reserves. Something Nigerians unable to recover from the dread of the killer herdsmen found ominous and perilous. Hence, they resisted it firmly and resoundingly from north to south. They believe the scheme is a ploy at land grab.
 
ADDING fillip to their suspicion was the fact that when another former herdsboy, Governor Abdullahi Ganduje of Kano state, gave an open invitation to herdsmen in difficulty across Nigeria to report in Kano state at a massive grazing reserve he had graciously earmarked for them, his offer was largely spurned. A report in the Premium Times (4 February 2018) filed by Muhammad Ahmad and Samuel Ogundipe was captioned "Herdsmen-Farmers Crisis: Governor invites  all Nigerian herdsmen to settle in Kano". 
 
PRESIDENT Buhari neither supported Ganduje financially in this laudable effort nor lent his voice to the invitation to the herdsmen to sedentarise at the grazing reserves. It was thus clear the goal of Ruga was indeed nationwide land grab.
 
HAPPILY, Governor Ganduje is Tinubu's political ally and bosom friend. He should begin to engage him as well as the incoming governor of  Kano state on developing a world class ranching facility in Kano. This is another low-hanging fruit. But he should expect opposition from Fulani irredentist forces who are going to argue that nomadism is a culture - a way of life - of the Fulani. It's how he deals with challenges of this sort that will alert Nigerians as to whether he's truly in charge or just marking time as president and commander in chief of the armed forces.
 
THE fifth measure is NATIONAL SECURITY SUMMIT. We recall that in the early days of General Olusegun Obasanjo in office as an elected president, one of the strategies he adopted to grapple well with the enormous challenges he met were sectoral summits he convened one after the other.
 
I commend this strategy to President Tinubu as it's capable of yielding a wealth of intelligence and knowledge on each sector germane to formulating appropriate policies and taking the right decisions. In this regard, he should start with a summit on national security. Importantly, he should accord retired military and security officers priority in the choice of invitees. Some of them marginalised deliberately while in service will tell him eye-opening things that will help him. In defence and security, intelligence is key. That's why Sun Tzu in "The Art of War" remarked thus: "An army without intelligence is like a man without eyes and functioning  ears"! The analogy is even more true of a commander in chief without real time actionable intel! So much for immediate measures and low-hanging fruits!
 
THE Tinubu blueprint, as noted in the opening of this piece, deals fairly well with long-term measures, but there's a lacuna that should be filled. That is the DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOCHTONOUS MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. In simple terms, we are talking of domestic production of arms and ammunition for the military and other security agencies.
 
PRESIDENT Tinubu should prioritise the transformation of the Defence Industry Corporation (DIC) that has been stagnating in Kaduna since 1964. He should decentralise its operations and create subsidiaries in viable centers across Nigeria. Ironically, Proforce, a private company in Ilishan Remo, Ogun state, is doing a lot better, manufacturing armoured personnel carriers for the army, police etc and foreign markets to boot! Involve the private sector more and more. That's how the most powerful country in the world - USA - stays on top.
 
ARMS and ammunitions are among the most expensive commodities in the international marketplace. No country can have a robust defence and internal security, relying on importation for all its needs. If all that President Tinubu can achieve in this regard is domestic production of all the rifles required by our military and other security agencies, he would have achieved a lot indeed.
 
FINALLY, the Tinubu blueprint says nothing expressly on the issue of STATE POLICE. It's at best couched in vague verbiage that needs not be rehashed here. But it is one of the long-term measures he needs to work on seriously. It's no news that the Federal Government can't even fund its own police adequately. In all the states, it's the state governments that fill the huge gap. They build police stations, buy patrol vehicles and provide money for lots of routine things germane to the smooth-functioning of the Nigeria Police in their respective state commands.
 
IN December 2019, I was on a research visit at Johns Hopkins University in the State of Maryland when, as a result of some incidents on campus, the state government licensed the University to set up its own police. I shook my head wondering why it's taking eternity to embrace state policing in Nigeria at a time the centralised policing system had failed spectacularly!
 
THE major argument against state police is the fear it would be abused by state governors to witchunt their political adversaries. Yet some fear it could be used by some states to secede from Nigeria. But my logic teacher didn't teach me that something good should be condemned because it can be abused. Even Marijuana has been found to have some medical benefits. 
 
NIGERIA is the only federation in the world running a unitary policing system. Federations like USA, Canada and India, among others, all operate decentralise policing. In Canada, it's only one province that did not set up its own police but rely absolutely on the federal police for its security. Same can apply in Nigeria. It will not be compulsory for states that lack the resources to float an independent police. They will continue to enjoy the services of the federal police.
 
WHAT is needed to allay the fears of possible abuse of the state police is to set the guidelines for its operations. In this regard, the mandate of the Police Service Commission (PSC) should be expanded by law to encompass regulatory authority over state police formations. This also requires its membership should be expanded to include at least an experienced retired police officer from each state of the federation.
 
THE guidelines should spell out the qualifications for the licencing of a state to set up its own police, modalties for personnel recruitment, training, mode of procurement of specified range of arms and ammunition, conditions of service, operational jurisdiction, and punitive measures for abuse of state police,  which may include temporary transfer of command and control from an erring state to the PSC.
 
FOR the sake of my children who have no country other than Nigeria, I wish Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu sound health (physical and mental), courage, fair-mindedness, and divine wisdom to tackle the onerous but surmountable security challenges awaiting him as Nigeria's incoming president. 
 
 
**** *Olufunmilade* , is a Professor of International Relations and Strategic Studies and Pioneer Director Buratai Center for Contemporary Security Affairs, Igbinedion University Okada, Edo State, Nigeria.

It is quite strange that many, including Lawyers and those who directly participated in the last election, were (are) confused about the role of BVAS and IReV in the electoral process. It is shocking.
 
Unfortunately, some of these people, with little or no knowledge about how something as basic as BVAS works have been at the vanguard of claims that BVAS failed, didn't work, on account of which they summarily pronounced that the election was manipulated.
 
The question is - How do you come to the conclusion that something did not work, when you do not even know how it works? 
 
Unfortunately, because these are either participants in the process or thought leaders, people, especially their followers simply assumed they spoke from the point of knowledge.
 
It was sad to see one of the candidates being tutored on TV on the difference between BVAS and IReV. This was after he had alleged that BVAS had not worked. That his attempt at a 'joke', reconfiguring BVAS as 'basic values acceptable..' failed on the last leg of the acronym did not help matters.
 
Maupe had offered him a lifeline, but his insistence on mismatching the BVAS-IReV distinction to a 3-course meal only reinforced the fact that he simply did not have an understanding of something so basic, yet critical to the election process.
 
More shocking was the admission by the Senior Advocate on live TV "that actually BVAS is not what we THOUGHT" 
 
After he had pronounced the election as the worst, he then tells us: "If you listen to the Chairman of the electoral management body, INEC...He made it clear to us, ad nauseam, that BVAS is the magic. Now it turns out that BVAS wasn't the magic...I had the unfortunate displeasure of actually checking what exactly is BVAS in the law. Actually BVAS is not what we thought was presented to us by the National Assembly in the enactment of the Electoral Act 2023...To summarise, BVAS is no more than a tool to accredit the voter..."
 
I would have thought that the first step would usually be for the Lawyer to check what the law says, rather than thinking or assuming. But what do I know?
 
The surprise really is that both the Electoral Act and the INEC Guidelines were quite clear on what BVAS is. BVAS is Bimodal Voter Accreditation System and that should tell anyone what it is all about. Section 8 makes the use of BVAS mandatory, which is what makes it a game-changer. Not only does the machine give more than one option for accreditation of voters, it rules out the use of incident forms, which had created avenue for rigging in the past. It was in BVAS shutting the door to non-accredited voters that made it a game-changer. I wonder what else, apart from using the equipment to take a snapshot of election result from the polling unit, that they THOUGHT BVAS was supposed to do.
 
Already, because accreditation is electronic through BVAS, it made it counter-productive for those with desire to rig through overvoting, as where BVAS is found not to have been used or number of accredited voters in the result sheet is not in tandem with what is found on BVAS, then the results become invalid. If not declared so by INEC, the Court, relying on Section 64 of the Electoral Act, will use it to determine the correctness of a disputed result. That is what makes BVAS a game-changer.
 
Beyond the argument around BVAS, there is also that about electronic transmission of results from the polling units. I suspect some are confusing the electronic transmission as found in Section 38 of the guidelines in their expectation of what IReV is all about.
 
On electronic transmission, while Section 38 (I) provides for it, but only as an option, as it also provides for 'transfer'. In the first place, the law gives INEC the leeway to decide on guidelines to be used for the conduct of elections.
 
I am not aware that INEC promised electronic collation, rather what we saw was a collation process that was manifestly manual, with all the forms for use made available to all parties ahead of the election.
 
In any case, the result being transmitted or transferred is the same one as obtained at the polling unit and made available to all party agents and security agency present at the point of voting.
 
Perhaps it is the use of IReV that is the most contentious of all. Section 38(ii) of the INEC Guidelines does indeed provide for the use of "BVAS to upload a SCANNED COPY OF THE EC8A to the INEC Result Viewing Portal."
 
But I am yet to find in the Guidelines or the Electoral Act where it is provided that the upload has to be instantaneous or mandatorily done from the polling unit. While conceding that the promise that it will be done from the polling unit was indeed made, as previously argued, I cannot see how failure to do so renders the result invalid or to the conclusion that the result has been manipulated.
 
As repeatedly argued, what was to be uploaded onto a viewing portal, which is meant for the public, is only a scanned copy of a result already available to the party agent anyway. IReV was only an icing on the cake, already baked, meant to enhance transparency and optics around the process. The cake is already baked, the failure of the icing will not render it unbaked.
 
I think that, as usual, a lot of the fuss about the failure of BVAS comes from procedural illiteracy and desperation to hang on to just about anything to query an outcome that is contrary to the one many prefer.
 
Those who have been quite vociferous about a 'stolen mandate' should be excited about BVAS and even IReV. The results are on the portal. All they need to do is crosscheck what is found there with what they have from their agents. Needless to say that where discrepancy is found, precedence suggests that it will be found in their favour. Section 64 of the Electoral Act is there as cover.
 
BVAS comes in to help in convincing the courts to invalidate results from areas where overvoting can be established (Section 64b).
 
In other words, BVAS, apart from having already largely prevented voting by ghosts, which in part explains the 'poor turnout' and election loss by many members of the power elite and 'sitting Governors', the technology comes handy in helping those who might have been short-changed to seek redress.
 
Unfortunately, those who have benefited from the deployment of BVAS and are well positioned to further benefit, if they indeed have a case, are the ones that have been aiming darts at it, possibly out of confusion or ignorance, further miseducating their followers, including those one would expect to know better.

This past few weeks, before and immediately after the elections has been a fiery trial for Nigerians in confronting challenges threatening to tear down the foundation of our nation. Against the backdrop of fears that Nigeria is irreversibly sliding down the slope of eventual breakdown of law and order following the horrifying trails of the Obidients described as "Headless mob" by Prof Chukwuma Soludo the current governor of Anambra state and validated by the Nobel laureate Prof Wole Soyinka (WS) "NATTERING NITWITS"
 
Peter Gregory Obi, Datti Baba-Ahmed and the Obidients movement began to constitute themselves into a very serious threat, shortly before and almost immediately after the elections. It is instructive that, today there is one thing that is profoundly certain, it is the incontrovertible fact that our country, Nigeria, has been besieged by anarchism, and has therefore become divisively dysfunctional and a dangerous enclave to dwell in. To some outside observers, this is not just a volatile religious fault-line but ethnic prejudices.
 
Their problem starts with exaggerated sense of self-worth, arrogance, garrulous and delusional audacity. Once you convince yourself that you have a lock on patriotism, you start the perilous journey towards perpetual delusion until when reality slaps you in the face. As evidenced in the leaked audio conversation between Peter Obi and our revered Bishop David Oyedepo. Peter made some strong words which are capable of dividing the country along religious divide. What is more, his campaign was built on ethnic jingoism.
 
They push for interim government through proxies, unmindful of Section 1 (2) of the Constitution that says thus: the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the Government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. Apart from the embarrassing show of shame by an Obidient enthusiastic air traveller attempting to highjack aeroplane, they equally did the unthinkable; calling for military take-over including the treasonous national television show of Datti Baba-Ahmed on Channels TV anchored by Seun Okibaloye.
 
Historically, the law shapes politics, economics, history and society in various ways and also serves as a mediator of relations between people. Interestingly, Peter Obi and his running mate Datti Baba-Ahmed may not even be qualified to run for election given the documents sighted thus far, and based on the law that requires at least 30 days membership of a political party to be submitted to Independent National Election Commission (INEC), it will means at the time Peter Obi usurped the Labour party (LP) ticket his records with INEC still recognized him as a Peoples Democratic party (PDP), member.
 
Of equal importance, however, from a legal theory perspective; this is where Lord Dennis legal theory will come into play, Lord Dennis with a Ph.d in Physics and Law said you can't place something on nothing, it was the theory which like 'DNA' of the modern period put an end to cases in many of the nation's of the western world. Unsurprisingly, Lord Denise's theory may ultimately end the dream of this anarchists in Nigeria politics. You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there. It will collapse' like pack of cards.
 
At times like this, irrationality and self-destructive behavior can further complicate issues, because self-defeating behavior is the essence of irrationality and thus shows the limits of human rationality. Oftentimes, character failure is not based on the measure one's character deficit but the inability to manage the same. Failure is something no one looks forward to or wants to experience. However, desperation and thoughts towards the idea of "do-or-die" politics must be discouraged.
 
It is against this backdrop that, I will like to conclude this contribution that focuses on Anarchists In Nigeria Politics with the profound words of Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah the current bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Sokoto. Kukah posited: "Leadership is no longer about office but about capacity to create and expand new frontiers of knowledge. This is where real power lies. It is the only means of neutralizing the corrosive identity such as ethnicity, regionalism and religious bigotry."
 

The post-election conversations have been a putrid salad of prejudices, recriminations, and elevated provincialism. Our wits, resolve, temperance, capacitance, and stability threshold as a nation are being tested, and they will be tested further in the months and years ahead.

Our history is always ready ammunition to be dispatched in any ethnic combat in that ungoverned social media neighbourhood. Contending sides launch missiles from the war rooms with their own ‘’droppings’’ of history. I will not be a soundboard for those tiresome and unyielding conversations here. The duty of the citizen is to be a dispassionate arbiter, divining truth from untruth, and staying irrepressibly on the side of the nation’s interest. I believe instead of these contentions which re-emerge in our public discourse every now and then, we can learn from our past and forge a better country.

The truth is, history is subjective. Every group has their own version of history -- as regards their social and political existence in Nigeria. But we cannot keep recycling the epics of woes that have bogged us down as a people. We must move forward and look forward.

Nigeria’s past is not a very glossy one, yes. It is replete with tales of pain, sorrow, and blood – depending on who is telling the story. Fatal mistakes were made, but must we keep reliving the errors of our past? Are we doomed to remain a rendition of our past? Can we not move forward – beyond our past?

Nothing changes because the old ways remain the same. We must think a new Nigeria, and a new Nigeria begins with new progressive thinking. We cannot take a leap into a glorious future while we are still stuck in the rut of the past. Our past has become today’s pain, and tomorrow’s burden.

But does this imply we must abandon our history? Absolutely not. We embrace it, but learn from it as well, and stop repeating the same mistakes. The current confusion shows we have learnt nothing from our chequered history.

Our past should teach us to be respectful of one another; it should teach us caution; it should teach us tolerance; it should teach us understanding; it should teach discipline, and it should teach us the very essence of unity.

Like Sir Ahmadu Bello, Sardauna of Sokoto, said to Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe: ‘’Let us understand our differences. I am a Muslim and a Northerner. You are a Christian, an Easterner. By understanding our differences, we can build unity in our country.”

We must manage our diversity with ‘’care, mutual respect, understanding, caution and trembling’’. We cannot discount our points of divergence, but we must also recognise that we have solid arcs of convergence. What unites us should be stronger than what divides us.

It is unfortunate that to reinforce prejudices, some deploy self-archived ahistorical accounts. Our past as a country should not be a springboard for hate exchanges, but a source of learning to forge a better country. We hold on to "history", whether manufactured or inverted, to accent our biases. Evolving means we are better than yesterday.

No one can hold their own version of history as truth everyone must chow down. There are villains and heroes in every story. It is depressing that our much-vaunted past has become stuff of propaganda passed down from one generation to another. Hate transitioning from one generation to another. We must break this circle of hostility.

Really, we cannot make progress as a country if we remain on this treadmill. We must sanitise our conversations, discard epithets, and evolve into a wholesome whole.

We must deconstruct revisionist fabrications and pretensions to make good of the future. Knowing that we started off on a shaky foundation should thrust us into consciously working out our destiny. We cannot hold on to an acrimonious past as a precedence for the present and the future. As I said previously, we take the lessons from the past and forge a new path.

We dissipate so much energy on ethnic bouts of supremacy but leave very little to interrogate fundamental issues of governance. We must make our existence as a nation about jutting issues that govern our lives as citizens – economy, security, education, and health.

In conclusion, it is insalubrious to ascribe the actions of deviants within a certain pool to any group. I have maintained this position since the wave of baleful propaganda against the Fulani. I will not deviate from the path of unity and peacebuilding no matter how perilous the road becomes.

The invidious and menacing enterprise of Peter Obi’s ‘’Obidients’’ has driven the dagger deep into the national umbilicus. Sore points quickened, passions inflamed, and bottled-up emotions unlatched.

First, we need to address the ‘’Obidient’’menace full-frontal, and we need to strengthen national and community concord. We need new ententes brokered for national cohesion or unity. We need to talk. We need to have those difficult conversations in civilised and decorous fora with a view to healing our nation. We need to talk with one another, not at each other.

We need new alliances cementing the north with the south, and the east with the west in holy matrimony. But to achieve this, we need to talk.

The aftermath of 2023 General Election, without a shadow of doubt, have exposed some politicians and “celebrities” who have been masquerading as patriots and objective intellectuals.

“But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger.”– Romans 2:8.

“The way you think determines the way you feel, and the way you feel influences the way you act” (The Purpose Driven Life, Rick Warren, 2002).

The internationally acclaimed Nigerian novelist and essayist, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, wrote and published an utterly biased piece titled “Nigeria’s hollow Democracy,” without providing any material evidence for her reprehensible and repugnant illogical conclusion. The ludicrous piece under microscope is a display of profligate arrogance which is not borne out of patriotism but embedded in self-serving, self-seeking, Igbocentric, and myopic reluctance to accept her own shortcomings. The totality of the piece, indeed, expose her hollow view of humanity. What is the point of being a much-hyped internationally acclaimed Nigerian novelist when you cannot positively promote, or be a good ambassador of your country of birth where you had your first foretaste of this world? This subliminal fact is akin to allegiance and patriotism. It is of note that there are over 176,000 polling units across Nigeria. In Lagos State, there are approximately 13,500 polling units. The pertinent questions to ask is; What is the percentage of the polling units where violence and malpractices actually occurred?

The unpalatable fact of the 2023 General Election is that the winner, Bola Tinubu, won in 12 States, Atiku Abubakar also won in 12 States, Peter Obi won in 11 States. In numerical strength, Bola Tinubu of All Progressive Congress (APC) scored 8,794,726 votes and came first, Atiku Abubakar of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) scored 6,984,520 votes and came second, Peter Obi of Labour Party (LP) scored 6,202,533 votes and came third, and Rabiu Kwankwaso of the New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) scored 1,496,687 votes and placed 4th. If Chimamanda genuinely have any issues with these election results, she should have directed her letter to our President, Muhammad Buhari, or wait for the Supreme Court final verdict.

It is also doleful that a perceptible writer would advertently, through measured actions, seek to damage our international reputation and heighten the negative perception and downbeat narratives about Nigeria and Nigerians. This preposterous act of national betrayal is not some sort of magical intervention or revolution, it is insane to diminish your Country and fellow citizens because of bread crumbs and half-baked endorsement. This is exactly what her letter to the United States President amount to. At what point do we end our colonial mentality and adoration of foreigners?  A rational mind need to be cognizant of the fact that you do not demean your country and then hope to swim in celebrated honour. Eniti o ba ta arale e lopo, kole ri ra lowon.

As an impenitent Igbo woman, Chimamanda Ngozi is Igbocentric in all ramifications. I am constrained to remind her and other cohorts that the same Igbocentric mentality led to the devastated January 15, 1966 Coup d’état perpetrated by a number of Nigerian military officers of Igbo extraction, largely driven by mortification tendency, visceral hatred, and ethnicity-based agenda. The malignant ordnance act destabilized Nigeria and eclipsed the country for more than 50 years. We have also witnessed some primordial belligerence and pugnaciousness exhibited by some of her kinsmen. An Igbo leader, Eze Igbo of Ajao Estate in Lagos, threatened to mobilize and invite members of the proscribed IPOB to Lagos State. The Eze Igbo is now cooling off in DSS custody. Another kinsman overtly called the Yoruba’s “political rascals”. You exhibit malignancy at any slight opportunity while consciously attempting to ignite waning flames, yet you are desperate to rule Nigeria. With this deep-seated ethnocentric mentality, it will take a monumental supernatural occurrence to rule Nigeria again.

As overtly stated in my recent piece, there is no region or tribe in Nigeria that has the monopoly of bigotry and visceral hatred. The South East and South South are not the only composition of Nigeria, there are other four geo-political Zones meaning that Nigeria is a vast country with different idiosyncratic culture, religion and tradition, and blessed with natural resources and human capital by virtue of population and geographical size.

As virtuous citizens, lets encourage Chimamanda Adichie to concentrate on her perpetual hollow hairstyles and fictional storytelling, that is her calling.

Femi Amosun is a UK-based management professional and politico-economic analyst with distinctive zeal for sustainable development through responsible governance and accountability.

 

Tuesday, 11 April 2023 14:28

[OPINION] Total Chair at 70 - Etim Etim

One of the most brilliant and profoundly thoughtful Akwa Ibom statesmen, Arc. Otu Ita Toyo, is just hours away from climbing the 7th floor on life’s journey, and his family and friends are rolling out the drums to celebrate him in a lavish birthday bash on Thursday, April 13. Fondly known as Total Chair, a nickname he acquired in his days as the Chairman of Akwa Ibom State Chapter of PDP between 2005 and 2008, Arc. Toyo is among the most intelligent and keenly insightful persons that I know. Total Chair is in a class of his own when it comes to the use of English. His command of the language, acuity of thoughts and ability to express complex and complicated ideas in fine prose, stand him out. It was in the 1980s that fine writers like Lance Morrow, Hugh Sidney and George Will made a lasting impression on me. I have added Otu Toyo to that list. I congratulate him on his 70th birthday, and I thank him for inviting me to his party. I can imagine that there would be fine wines, good food and many tributes from political associates from across the country. TC is one of our very best and I think we should all celebrate this jolly, good man.
 
Total Chair studied architecture at ABU, one of the nation’s first six universities, and practiced it for a long spell of time in Calabar. Then, ABU was home to the nation’s firebrand activists like Dr. Bala Usman, Dr. Walter Rodney, Prof Ishaya Audu (who later became President Shehu Shagari’s Foreign Minister), Prof Ango Abdullahi (who became its VC in the early 1980s) and many others. The young Toyo enthusiastically soaked in the exciting moments of campus politics and the sizzling speeches and lectures of the faculty members. If ABU gave Toyo his idealism, it was in Calabar, during the Second Republic and under the mentorship of the late Senator Victor Akan, that he came into his own. Akan was a successful QS, businessman and a flamboyant NPN Senator in the Second Republic. Toyo studied Akan like a book, admired his astuteness in politics and a sense of duty as an entrepreneur. I guess Toyo’s sartorial style and fondness for cognac and good wines came from the Senator. Calabar also provided Toyo opportunity to get close to, and learn from the late Prof. Eskor Toyo, an eminent economist and socialist who taught at the University of Calabar for decades. From the prof, Toyo understood early on why socialists are more concerned with production for use, rather than for profit and equitable distribution of wealth and material resources among all people. How the young Toyo was able to blend effectively with the Marxism of the professor and the capitalism of the wealthy senator will require further studies. But we now know the foundation on which he built his unique personae.
 
I first met Total Chair around January 2007 in Lagos, just a few months to the general elections of April 2007. I was then a member of a group known as Concerned Akwa Ibom Professionals in Lagos. The body was led by Mr. Udom Inoyo, then an Executive Director at ExxonMobil. The group had invited all the governorship candidates in Akwa Ibom for a briefing session in Lagos. We wanted to be informed of what the candidates had in their agenda for the state. I recall that Mr. James Iniama (candidate of Action Congress); Chris Ekpenyong (who had decamped from the PDP and was running on another party) and Godswill Akpabio (PDP) had honoured our invitation and came to brief us in details on their blueprint. From the Professionals, those who attended, to the best of my recollections, included Senator Udoma Udo Udoma; Mr Uko Udom (now Commissioner for Justice & Attorney General) and his brothers, Mfon (CEO of Ibom Air) and Essien (lawyer); Mr Aniekan Ukpanah (lawyer); Mr. Tony Ndah (a renowned QS); Mr. Paul Usoro (former NBA President) and wife, Mfon; Mr. Aniefiok Udott (now a businessman in Canada). Of course, our leader, Mr Inoyo, was in charge of proceedings. Many others were there, but I can’t remember all. It was my lot to welcome the candidates and introduce them to the podium.
 
When Akpabio arrived, I went out to welcome him and his small delegation. He came with Mr. Inibehe Otoho (now APC chieftain and wealthy businessman); Onofiok Luke (his PA then, now a member of the House of Representatives) and a handsome, fair-complexioned gentleman. I ushered them into a holding room at Hotel Bellissimo, Lekki, venue of the event, and briefed them on the format of the programme. Soon, I led them into the large conference hall of the hotel where the other candidates had already made their presentations. When it was time for me to introduce Akpabio to the podium, he took the microphone from me, leaned over and whispered for a long time to the handsome gentleman who was by now seated next to him. The gentleman then collected the mike from the candidate, collected his thoughts and introduced himself as Arc. Otu Ita Toyo, the State Chairman of the PDP, and went on to introduce Akpabio in glowing terms, concluding that he ‘’is the next governor of Akwa Ibom State’’. That was my first time of seeing Toyo and Akpabio in this life.
 
The PDP primary election that threw up Akpabio as the governorship candidate weeks earlier in Uyo was so stormy and acrimonious that it lasted three days and was held at three different venues. Fifty-eight aspirants contested, among them the son-in-law of the outgoing governor, Obong (Arc) Victor Attah. There were schemes to cancel the result and take the ticket from Akpabio, but he prevailed. The fight took an emotional toll on the candidate and Chairman Toyo, who arrived our event that Saturday evening looking drained and almost suspicious of everybody. However, between the Chairman and his candidate, there was a palpable camaraderie, and perhaps, that explained why he opted for Toyo to introduce him. As I watched the small drama unfold, I pondered the importance politicians place on form and appearances, but little did I know that Toyo would turn out to be one of the leading lights in our state and my good friend to boot.
 
Total Chair writes a lot about the failings of our governments and agonizes over the inability or unwillingness of leaders to use the people’s resources for the benefit of the people. It must be due to the nature of our politics that seminal thoughts leaders like Toyo are not in the mainstream of governance. Although he has since 2015 joined APC, nobody at the center seems to reckon with his talents and leadership skills. It sometimes seems as if we loathe the best amongst us. 
 
Happy Birthday, Total Chair!

The Obidients are (with apologies to Governor Charles Soludo) "a headless mob" similar to the demonised and emotionally unhinged rabble that insisted on the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ.
 
They are filled with the same violent, angry, divisive, rebellious, treacherous, mutinous, treasonous, deceitful, mendacious, deceptive, ungrateful, covetous, vain, insatiable and murderous spirit that possessed Lucifer, Son of the Dawn. 
 
Like Medusa the Gorgon, they are a hydra-headed monster comprising of confused, ignorant and frustrated souls with very low self-esteem, a maniacal sense of entitlement, insufferable arrogance and a desperate and psychotic lust for power. 
 
Give them that power and you will see Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Ian Smith, Hendrik Verwoerd, Joseph Kony, Val the Impaler, Genghis Khan, Atilla the Hun and Jean Bedie Bokassa all rolled into one rise from the dead.
 
Give them power and you will see Caligula, Nero, Al Capone, Lucky Luciano, Jack the Ripper, Augusto Pinochet, Pharaoh, King Herod, Jezebel, Sennacherub, Nebuchadnezzar, the Boston Strangler, Mobutu Sese Seko and King Leopold 11 of Belgium all rolled into one come alive again to torment the world.
 
They remind me of Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu, one of the leaders of the January 15th 1966 mutiny in which many leaders from the old Northern and Western Region were murdered in cold blood.
 
Give them power and their leader, Peter Gregory Obi, will continue what Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu started.
 
He will implement the Nzeogwu agenda to the letter and with ruthless and relentless brutality and clinical precision. 
 
No matter how well masked, fascists will always be fascists and a leopard cannot change its spots. 
 
Despite all their seeming humility, false piety, fake righteousness and nauseous, grovelling "yes daddy" expressions of insincere love they are filled with unadulterated hatred for all those that do not share their views and that refuse to tow their obnoxious, venomous and poisonous line.
 
As the Bible says, "their speech is as smooth as butter but war is in their hearts". 
 
Vile words, hate speech, propaganda, falsehod, lies, threats, insults, turmoil, intrigue, betrayal, subterranean plots, violence, evil conspiracies and the inability to brook opposing views or tolerate dissenting voices are their hallmark and forte.
 
They are not just a political party or movement: they are a dark, sinister, insidious, destructive, malignant, malevolent, cancerous, divisive, fanatical and dangerous force of vicious and sociopathic subversives and religious and ethnic bigots who are heavily invested in the kingdom of darkness, who have strong connections in the international criminal underworld, who are under the power and influence of western intelligence agencies, who have poisoned the souls and fouled up the minds of millions of young Nigerians and who are hell bent on destroying the Nigerian state and dismembering our country.
 
They speak Nigeria but Biafra and the total and complete enslavement and subjugation of our people is in their hearts. 
 
They are not democrats in ANY sense of the word and they do not believe in democracy.
 
They would be better described as a vicious, blood-lusting and bloodthirsty cult who feed on the souls, kindle the barbarity and fuel the depravity of misguided and lesser men and miserable and frustrated women. 
 
They believe in nothing but deceit, lies, propaganda, threats, violence and intimidation.
 
They do not believe in or serve the Living God and they have no regard for the God of heaven.
 
They are the quintessential "unbelievers" who use God's name to commit atrocities and to justify their monstrous behaviour, their psychopathic aggression and their wild delusions. 
 
They worship and serve a strange entity and occultic deity known as 'Obidati' at whose alter they offer praises, make sacrifices and serve blood in the bewitching hour of every morning.
 
They are evil. They are vicious. They are uncouth. They are uncharitable. They are unkind.
 
They are unforgiving. They are merciless. They are destructive. They are relentless. They are ruthless. They are unjust.
 
They are divisive. They are vengeful and they must be stopped at ALL costs.
 
They must NEVER be allowed to come into the circles of power because they will divide, destroy and dismember our great country, bring her to her knees and cause her to perish.
 
(FFK)

This piece may go down as one of the unpopular opinions in this space, not because it is fallacious, but because the truth it points to, stands the risk of being dismissed as act of jealousy or malice. Of course anyone who maintains regular opinion column will definitely come under fierce criticism, except such fellow is hosting an ineffectual space aimed at pacifying all men and women of honour and dishonor. But any columnist that is worth his onion will occasionally run into rejection, once any of his/her verdicts clashes with popular schools-of-thought on a particular topic.
 
The court of public opinion which its panel of judges are controlled by emotions have smacked its gavel against me severally. It is one of the hazards of this job (as selfless as it is). Nsukka dialectal rhetorical proverb has it that "onye bu únú sozuru oha uso?" (anyone who seeks universal acceptability must turn himself into salt).
 
The event that trailed the March 18, 2023 gubernatorial and State Houses of Assembly elections in Abia and Enugu States threw up once again the need for conscientious moral re-armament among Nigerians.
 
In Abia, Alex Otti of Labour Party was comfortably leading Okey Ahiwe of the People's Democratic Party (PDP), when final results from Obingwa local government area came in with astronomical figures. This monstrous and bogus result, if allowed to stand, would mean that Otti would have been easily knocked off his perch. 
 
Observers shuddered in disbelief!
 
The people said no, and threw their hats into the ring. Abians were combatant ready to wrestle all accomplices of this sham to the netherworld. Labour Party cried foul. But the decision was with the Returning Officer — Prof Nnenna Oti (who hails from Ebonyi State, but whose surname, by sheer random coincidence, rhymes with that of the State Labour Party candidate).
 
As Vice Chancellor of Federal University of Technology Owerri (FUTO), she was hired by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), as Returning Officer for Abia Guber poll. But when the report of irreconcilable over-voting in Obingwa LGA came, collation was suspended, and the results were taken to Abuja for review by National office of INEC. There was breathtaking stalemate for days while the review lasted. Suspense hovered around the people. After the review, instruction was issued by the reviewers that the controversial Obingwa LGA votes shouldn't stand, and Prof Nnenna was to announce the results in line with INEC directives.
 
This, she did, exhibiting overbloated egoism in a manner that doesn't befit a high ranking academic, a university Don and highbrow Intellectual like her. Let it be on record that Prof. Nnenna's terms of reference is to declare the final results presented to her, and she did virtually nothing more than that to warrant the resultant mass hubris she incited. How she managed to attract needless attention to herself is a marvel.
But the fact that she could make certain unverified allegations of herself being pressured to pronounce the looser a winner, paints her as someone who knows how to steal the show.
 
For the record: Nigerians are tired of the two mega political parties — PDP and All Progressives Congress (APC) because most people nurse this consensus belief that the two parties had poorly managed our democracy. 
 
Emotions were highly charged against them. The nation's barometric indices were all showing red, and it was easy to incur the wrath of the masses or court their excitement.
 
Prof. Nnenna as a Nigerian, and an Igbo of South East extraction knew this very well. So, it was a convenient whim for her to cash into the populist ideology and become a "national hero."  That was not quite the issue as was her boastful disposition. She, (seeing that the country was watching), raised her shoulders and arrogated to herself, the position of arbiter of moral justice.
 
First, she began by accusing unnamed political actors of wooing her with money, and later charging her with threats to announce their candidate as the winner.
 
“They came with their threats, they came with their money, they came with their intimidation, I remained unshakable" she alleged with gleeful braggadocio. 
 
Who exactly were the "they"?
Nigeria as a funny state has kept blind eye to the collective pronoun — "they" which she used in her allegation. Even our secret police department never called her for questioning to ascertain the veracity of her claims.
 
Meanwhile, was it actually her heroism alone that helped saved the day? There are four gated procedures for the declaration of final governorship election results. Collation is done at the polling unit, ward, local governments and state levels, before final declaration of the winner is made. 
 
The first three stages are all potential venues for people to fall for the temptation of altering results and compromising the integrity of the whole process. Many polling agents are usually lured with irresistible offers to look the other way at those levels. Was she at the polling units, wards and local government levels? 
 
The answer is no!
 
Men stood their ground at those points to insist that the "surplus" in Obingwa result be disregarded. Those were grassroot heros of democracy. But Prof. Nnenna allotted all the glory to herself, because she had the privilege of newsmen's microphones and cameras.
 
Since the event, we have seen many Nigerians, including Presidential spokesman — Femi Adesina, praise her to high heavens, and prayed for more of her kind. The truth is that we need more of those grassroot advocates of social justice, who spotted the irregularities in Obingwa, mounted continuous pressure on INEC till it heeded their voices by removing the disputed figures. Prof. Nnenna only announced what the authorities at INEC headquarters Abuja told her to announce. This was why her counterpart in Enugu said that he was announcing the results in line with instructions from the electoral umpire. 
 
Second, she appealed to christian sentiments, in guise of professing her faith. “My conscience as a Christian will not allow me to further participate in this process. I didn’t start today. I stand here before God and Jesus Christ. I have never defrauded anyone. Under me, votes must count, under me, the people’s mandate must be upheld" she said.
 
While she was making those remarks, she ridiculously raised her shoulders in boastful demonstration of cosmetic spirituality. She blew her own trumpet, canonizing herself on pharisaic altar of self-righteousness. But the Word of God advised: "be careful not to parade your uprightness in public to attract attention; otherwise you will lose all reward from your Father in heaven (Matt. 6:1).
 
Prophet Jeremiah forewarned: “let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, let not the mighty man boast in his might, let not the rich man boast in his riches..." (Jer. 9:23–24).
 
Christian charity abhors boasting, pride and publicization of good works done by oneself. 
Even Jesus Christ, Whom, she mentioned up there admonished: "when you have done everything you were told to do, you should say, "we are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.” (LK. 7:10). The reason for this divine advisory was because "to whom much is given, much is required" (LK. 12:48).
 
Third, she was grandstanding on public morality. She did what showbiz professionals do — broadcast their good deeds to attract social media hype, and guilt-trip those who may or may not have done as they did. Such public show of 'moral rectitude' portends indirect stigma on those they believe they are better off.
 
There are other Good Nigerians who have done more examplary deeds worthy of emulation, but shut their mouths.
 
In 2018 a cleaner at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, one Miss Mary Ishaya, picked a bag containing $2,000,140 at the male toilet of the aerodrome and returned it intact to the owner. A clear demonstration of honesty, integrity and incorruptible character. Weeks later, a certain Anthony Obioha, another cleaner with the same airport, found and returned another bag containing $7,000 to the authorities to trace and return it to the owner.
 
Perhaps, their heroism didn't trend because they were not Professors or theirs did not bother on electoral matters. Added to her academic gown and garlands of heroism, Prof. Oti should be reminded to adorn the fabrics of humility as the foremost regalia of Christian virtues.
 
May daylight spare us!

It seems to me that Prof Wole Soyinka did not take time to distinguish between Obidents and Obicracy.

Dear Readers

From KISS to Chaos.

In 2023, we are at a place where in the name of Keeping It Simple and Stupid as a mode of persuasion for the purpose of selling and recruiting we have ended up creating a conversational universe dominated by soundbites and headlines but worse still, inhabited and controlled by millions for whom text in context, detail and logic are tedious and unnecessary, facts and principles subject to personal positions and observed actors and interests.

In this conversational universe, where everyone in any conversation is primarily a sales person with one zero sum agenda, or the other, eager to persuade and to sell a position or an idea, it is easy to see why most members of the KISS conversational universe are warriors with little interest in or time to learn, understand or reason. Given that most of these warriors are neither professional sales people nor trained public speakers let alone rhetoricians, it is easy to understand how the KISS conversational universe eventually descended into Chaos.

Yes, a complex system with too many actors displaying unregulated, hence random, and uncoordinated reactions to inputs. It is a world in which I have seen comments on social media that has made me wonder, in the past, if it is possible for people to have learnt to write without going through the process of learning to read. I say in the past because we now know that we are dealing with mostly untrained sales people eager to sell and untrained warriors eager conquer. Mind you, all these considerations have little to do with the goodness of their hearts or the nobility their convictions, we are simply dealing here with their mode of assimilating and expressing information. Of course, some are good whilst others are bad, many are manipulated whilst others are manipulators, some are beneficiaries and paid operators whilst others are believers and passionate.

It is in this context of KISS to Chaos that we must situate the ongoing controversy that sees the revered and globally acclaimed activist, poet, playwright, teacher, writer and leader of thought, Prof Wole Soyinka, who is closer to 90 than to 88 years old. My apologies to the informed and the initiated, yes, I could have just mentioned his name without further qualifications like I normally do or, or just say Kongi, like we normally do or just said Nobel Laureate in Literature but these are peculiar times we live in. Clearly, repeatedly and with emphasis, is the way we consult the gods for the deaf. No one is deafer or blinder than those who for interests or convictions refuse to listen or see…

In a series of public intervention that are now very shared and highly commented but hardly analysed, Prof Wole Soyinka denounced what he sees as the fascist tendencies of the Obidient movement. He pointed the flaws of the members of the movement who seem allergic to correction, divergent views, complex positions and suggestions. Prof Soyinka also denounced what in his own view was wrong with the statement made by presidential running mate of the Obidient movement ticket, which he described as threatening, intimidating and blackmailing. He also denounced violence and many other things but that was lost in translation and this is part of where WS is wronged.

Lest we become guilty of what we accuse of others, it is important to clearly point out where I disagree with Kongi and where I think he is wrong. For the records, I think Obidients are extremely partisan, very unruly, intemperate and with a vexatious sense of self-righteousness but I disagree with WS when he describes Obidients’ as the most repulsive, off-putting concoctions ever encountered in the political arena. It can be rightly argued that WS was referring to term “Obidient”, not the essence of the “Obidient Movement”, but most people did not see that difference; what most people understood is that he thinks the Obidient movement is the most repulsive, off-putting concoctions ever encountered in the political arena.

Why blame WS and not those that misunderstood or choose to misunderstand him? I do so because he is a teacher and he should take his time to be understood in matters of national concern where the audience are not just the lettered part of the population. Prof Soyinka is neither a struggling local teacher nor a Nollywood producer or writer known for self-published works, he is an international figure that is known and that knows the world of today and the past.

In terms of designation, “stomach infrastructure” coined in 2014 is worse than Obidient, the “Chop I Chop group” of 1964 is worse than the Obidient movement, the Fronte Uomo Qualunque, (UQ) of 1946 is worse than the Obidient movement. In terms of action and factually speaking, insolent as they are, the Obidents have not been so far indicted or suspected of a single act of violence. In terms of mode of operation, the violent ways of the NNDP of the first republic was clearly worse than what Obidents have dared so far, the blatant corruption and abuse of power of the NPN in the second republic is clearly worse than what Obidents have dared so far, and till we get media or individual report there is nowhere Obidents have been accused of violence or voters’ intimidation.

It seems to me that Prof Soyinka did not take time to distinguish between Obidents and Obicracy.

 

Obidents (movement) is a motley collection of disgruntled Nigerians (mostly but not only young) that are unhappy with the status quo especially the two major parties. They are children of anger that grew up from the transition from KISS to Chaos. They don’t know how to say “I disagree”, they tend to say “shut up, you stupid fool”. They express themselves mostly namelessly and facelessly in the cyber space and they have convinced themselves that anonymity shields from responsibility and the care of empathy or duty of logic and facts.

Too many times, even they cannot express their anger and pain but if you take time to listen to them you will readily see that they feel like eagles trapped in the bodies and lives of chickens by bad leadership in an unfulfilling land. True or false, many of them have tales of seeing those less capable than them do better than them not because of what they know but because of who they know, they have seen political thugs ride luxurious cars past them whilst they with their hard-earned certificates in hand struggle to get into overcrowded buses on their way to meetings with miserable prospects. They have mental picture of those paid to manage their health system go abroad for health care, they see children of those who have destroyed their state education send their children to private and foreign schools.

These children of anger have no regard for institutions nor trust in the state because they consider their country a place where the wind of the good God does not blow because it is too busy fanning those with air conditioners. They have no respect for the older generations because they think the older ones failed them by allowing things to go this bad.

It is not the way in our (Yoruba) culture for the young to correct the old but I strongly believe and humbly submit to Prof Soyinka that I think a teacher and a father should spend more time understanding and educating rather than attacking those in pain and in need of knowledge. They need care understating and hope.

Obicracy is the management of the Obident movement, their origin is mostly in the third force movement that was in the making before the arrival of Peter Obi from the PDP. The Labour Party (LP) on which they presented themselves for the 2023 electoral contest is a party to which they have neither ideological nor historical link, it is just a means to an end. While they have been strong on propaganda, these Obicrats (Obidient managers) have turned to be mediocre administrators, incapable of reading the nuances of the country and unable to field candidates in every possible position let alone deploy polling agents in every polling booth. They have reaped more than they have planted, their strength lies in the discontent of the people not their own ideas or organisational skills. They can talk and sell illusions but they are weak at doing. I think it is wrong to spend time fighting or labelling them.

Prof Soyinka is also wronged because his views were oversimplified by the media and those that used his statement as a validation of their position. Shame on all those who rushed to insult this old respected, knowledgeable and accomplished man. That unfortunately is the kind of politics we have chosen to play today. Too many of us have become partisan fanatics that cannot handle complex or complete thoughts anymore so I will not be surprised if some people genuinely think saying “Soyinka is wrong and wronged” is hard to understand or simply “fencsist”. Time will tell…

Join me if you can @anthonykila to continue these conversations.

Anthony Kila is Centre Director at CIAPS Lagos. www.ciaps.org.

On Monday last week the Nigeria Press Organisation (NPO) set the tone for the birth of a new era of accountable journalism practice. The NPO is made up of the Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN), Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) and the Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ).

However, in setting up the National Media Complaints Commission (NMCC) whose other name is National Ombudsman, the NPO also worked with journalists in the broadcast and online media to achieve an industry-wide consensus. Since the Code of Ethics of the profession was inaugurated in Ilorin in 1998 there has been no positive development in the industry that can be compared with the inauguration of the Ombudsman. The President of the NPO Mr Kabiru Yusuf and all the fellows who toiled day and night to bring this heart-warming development about deserve a full cup of adulation.

 

Since 1977 when the then Head of State General Olusegun Obasanjo brought an obnoxious Nigeria Press Council decree that the media kicked against there have been various efforts by subsequent governments to muzzle the press. There were two Press Council decrees by General Ibrahim Babangida the last of which was the Nigeria Press Council Act No. 85 of 1992. This was amended in Act No. 60 of 1999 by the General Abdulsalami Abubakar government. The media rejected it because of its oppressive and punitive clauses.

 

Then came General Sani Abacha’s National Mass Media Commission and Press Court against which the media offered a robust response because of its potential for the annihilation of the media. Can you imagine that a separate court was to be set up to try the media men and women as if they were common criminals who needed to be singled out for preferentially harsh treatment? And if these attacks on the media occurred during the military you had a right to expect that the media’s freedom will get the support of National Assembly members who are products of a democratic system brought about by the rigour and vigour of the media who fought along with some patriotic persons to drive the military boys out of the scene. If you thought so you were wrong. In the last eight years or so the National Assembly has been the hatchery for oppressive media legislation which the media have had to fight against almost every year. And in several cases the legislation was clandestinely smuggled into their chambers for discussion without the media’s knowledge or invitation to submit their views for consideration.

 

So the arrival of the National Ombudsman at this time is a most welcome development. It will kill the distrust of the public and also boost public confidence in the media. It will also keep the media men and women on their toes as far as their practice is concerned.

The only media establishment that, on its own, established the office of the ombudsman was the Daily Times under Alhaji Babatunde Jose. Alhaji Alade Odunewu was appointed as the Ombudsman for all the 13 publications in the Daily Times Group. However, some years ago the NPAN appointed a retired judge as an Ombudsman. Some members of the Association kicked against it because the office of the Ombudsman is different from, and not a substitute for, a law court.

Before now the NPAN had ordered its members to appoint an internal ombudsmen in their various media to deal with disputes or conflicts that may arise between their editorial staff and the public. Such ombudsmen are also expected to ensure that their media organisations keep to the canons of journalism practice; keep their news organisations honest and accountable to the public for news reported, and ensure that the public’s right to know is protected by them.

The composition of the National Ombudsman is awesome. It is peopled by men and women of experience in journalism, law, scholarship and a high level of integrity.

They are: Mr Emeka Izeze, Chairman, is a former Editor in Chief and Managing Director of the Guardian newspapers, Mr A.B. Mahmond, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and past President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Professor Chinyere Stella Okunna, Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academics) of Paul University, Awka and a media scholar, Dr Hussain Abdu, a development specialist and Country Director, Crae International (Nigeria), Ms Dupe Ajayi-Gbadebo, a journalist, lawyer and arbitrator; Mr Lanre Idowu, Editor in Chief, Diamond Publications Limited and Founder Diamond Awards for Media Excellence (DAME), Mr Edetaen Ojo, Executive Director, Media Rights Agenda, Ms Eugenia Abu, broadcaster, author and columnist, and Mr Segun Odebunmi, Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on

 

With a gathering of such eminent persons from various fields the public should expect nothing but fair and unassailable adjudication. The body is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism which will use its collective wisdom to tackle disputes brought before it. It will have to be guided by two journalism tools (a) the recently revised and approved code of journalism ethics (b) canons of journalism practice. These canons are encapsulated in the acronym FOBAC, that is Fairness, Objectivity, Balance, Accuracy and Completeness.

The range of what people may be expected to complain about will include articles in newspapers and magazines in Nigeria or materials broadcast on radio or television as well as online that a person believes affects his or her unfairly. They are also expected to look into reports filed about the conduct of a journalist that is objectionable and adjudicate on them. Since there are lawyers on the board it may be wise for them to look into legal issues if the combatants agree since it takes quite an inordinately long time to settle cases in our courts. Legal expenditure is also humongous if one is to traverse all the courts all the way to the Supreme Court. A group such as this is absolutely important at this time when the social media artists are poisoning the waters of professional journalism which brings a bad name to the media generally. There are very many one-person news organisations where news is fabricated and dished out to the public. They erroneously call what they do citizen journalism but journalism is a profession guided by rules of practice and ethics. It is not a one-person orchestra.

No one person organisation can dish out information that can pass the journalism test. Journalism is a rigorous profession which needs a long line of reporters, line editors and editors to check and cross-check what is being served to the public. That template has been severely watered down by social media activists who prefer speed to accuracy in their so called news dissemination. The social media anarchists are the most prominent purveyors of fake news and hate speech because most of them are untrained in journalism. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has just announced that it had recorded 22 incidents of hate speech during the recent elections. This was revealed by Mr Hilary Ogbonna who is the Project Coordinator of Mobilising Voters for Election (MOVE) of the Commission. That is a serious accusation that does no credit to those who were the conveyor belts of these pieces of hate speech.

 

The coverage of the elections by various media fell short of reasonable expectation. There were several cases where the media fanned the embers of disunity and discord and a few cases of profiling too.

The worst aspects of the election coverage were the opinion polls. Almost all the opinion polls as published violated the rules of the Nigerian media code of election coverage. The rule says that “a journalist shall ensure due diligence and exercise restraint in reporting the findings of election opinion polls by clearly stating the context, particularly those who commissioned and conducted the poll, the specific questions that were asked, the number and diversity of people interviewed and the limitations and margin of error of the poll.”

Also the code states that “a media organisation shall make use of objective methodologies that neither favour nor exclude particular groups and interests in conducting election opinion polls.” In these respect it is obvious that all the media that published or broadcast the opinion poll results fell short of the requirements for the dissemination of such poll results. Most of the polls had very limited samples in a country of more than 200 million people and 174, 000 polling units. The media ought to have done better than they did.