Admin

Admin

President Bola Tinubu sharply criticized fuel subsidies on Friday, describing them as a “scam” that inhibits growth and benefits smugglers while effectively subsidizing fuel costs for other countries.

These comments were made during a meeting with Nigerians residing in France, as reported by his Special Adviser on Special Duties, Communication, and Strategy, Dele Alake.

The President explained that his advisors had initially omitted the subject of fuel subsidy removal from his inaugural address, still, he deemed it crucial to eliminate the subsidy from day one.

This meeting marked President Tinubu’s first public discussion following his inaugural speech on May 29, 2023, during which he declared the end of fuel subsidies.

His announcement led to a near-instant increase in fuel prices and hoarding, inciting calls for protest by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC).

These reactions occurred despite former President Muhammadu Buhari’s earlier efforts to terminate fuel subsidy payments by June.

President Tinubu assured the attendees of his commitment to revitalizing the education and health sectors.

He also confirmed that ongoing economic reforms would be sustained and broadened, aiming to alleviate families grappling with poverty and insecurity.

His remarks came just over a week after signing the Students Loan Bill into law.

In a dialogue with the Nigerian community in France, President Tinubu pledged to develop and implement creative policies in sectors directly affecting Nigerians’ livelihoods, like electricity, sports, and energy.

The President assured that the interests of Nigerians would always be prioritized in discussions with international communities, governments, and organizations on global issues such as climate change, energy transition, food security, trade, security, and diplomacy.

President Tinubu acknowledged the country’s ongoing challenges with transportation, electricity, and infrastructure.

He notably highlighted his decision to remove fuel subsidies, referring to it as releasing “the giant elephant of fuel subsidy without bringing down the house.”

Despite political divisions, the President promised to promote unity and prosperity for all Nigerians, reiterating his commitment to implement reforms for a better nation.

In closing, Nigeria’s Ambassador to France, Kayode Laro, and several other attendees expressed their gratitude and support to President Tinubu for his visionary leadership and dedication to economic reform.

The National President of the Arewa Youth Consultative Forum (AYCF), Alhaji Yerima Shettima has said that the claims made by former militant Asari Dokubo concerning illegal oil bunkering in the Niger Delta region are not far from the truth.

Recall that Dokubo had claimed that the Nigerian military is at the centre of 99 percent of oil theft incidents recorded in the Niger Delta.

Reacting to Dokubo’s claims during an interview with Vanguard, Shettima insisted that the allegations against the Nigerian military did not begin with the agitator.

He noted that the former governor of Rivers State, Nyesom Wike also stated that some security personnels are involved in oil bunkering and pipeline vandalisation.

Shettima opined that he believes Dokubo’s allegations and it is now left for President Bola Tinubu to make a decision concerning the situation.

He said, “First of all, the issues Asari Dokubo raised are very fundamental and germane. The Dokubo I know does not raise any alarm when he is not sure of it. Don’t forget that the allegation he raised didn’t just start today. It only takes people with the courage to come out and say what he said. What he said is not different from what Tompolo said a few months ago. It is also not different from what Wike said in Rivers State that some security personnel are involved in bunkering and vandalisation. I trust him and I believe what he said. It is left to the man in charge, (President Tinubu) to take a decision. He needs to take a decision on that to stop the ugly trend.

“I would also advise him to critically look at all sections of the country to unite all sections. He should look at the issue of security and corruption. Anyone found guilty should not go unpunished. He is also a victim of some allegations. He should prove to the world that he is not what some people think. Tinubu has nothing to lose. God has blessed him with everything he wanted. So, he will only be remembered for the good things he did.”

The Central Bank of Nigeria has ordered banks and other financial institutions in the country to regularly screen accounts of Politically Exposed Persons.


It stated this in its circular to banks and other financial institutions on Friday titled, ‘Guidance notes on Politically Exposed Persons’, which was signed by the Director, Financial Policy and Regulation Department, Chibuzor Efobi.


In the circular, it stated that, ““PEP accounts should be subject to periodic reviews as may be determined by the FI in line with risk assessment.


“Frequency of the periodic reviews should be determined by the risk of the customer and documented appropriately. FIs should also review their PEP database frequently.”

It added that, “On a regular basis, transactions and account activities should be monitored and scrutinised for money laundering/terrorist financing/ proliferation financing risks.”

The CBN explained domestic PEPs to be those entrusted with prominent public positions in Nigeria, while those entrusted with prominent public positions in any other foreign jurisdiction were foreign PEPs.

It noted that in view of the corruption level in Nigeria, domestic PEPs were rated highly vulnerable to financial risks, therefore, by default, most domestic PEPs were considered high risk.

Foreign PEPs and PEPs with prominent functions in international organisations should be categorised based on the level of risk as assessed by financial institutions, it stated.

The CBN said customer due diligence should continue after establishing a relationship with the customer.

“The behaviour of the customer, transactions and accounts should be in line with the expected level of activity. Ongoing monitoring is crucial as a customer risk profile may change over time.”

The CBN stated that financial institutions, in the ordinary course of their businesses, established business relationships with PEPs, who may be vulnerable to corruption and portend reputational and financial crime risks to the FI.

PEPs, it stated, posed a high risk of money laundering, financing of terrorism and proliferation financing due to the possibility that individuals holding such positions may misuse their power and influence for personal gain or advantage to themselves, close family members and associates.

The CBN said, “Such individuals may also use their families or close associates to conceal illicit funds and assets.


“In addition, they may also seek to use their power and influence to gain representation and/or access to, or control of, legal entities for similar purposes.”

Saturday, 24 June 2023 09:16

Tinubu Govt Makes Fresh Appointment

The Bola Ahmed Tinubu-led Federal Government has approved the appointment of Prof. Olayinka Oladiran Adegbenhigbe as the Acting Chief Medical Director of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile- Ife.

Naija News reports that the Federal Ministry of Health approved the appointment which takes effect from Tuesday, June 20, 2023.

Adegbenhigbe’s appointment was disclosed by the Public Relations Officer of the hospital, Kemi Fasooto, in a statement in Osogbo, the Osun State capital, on Friday.

Quoting a letter signed for the Permanent Secretary by the Director, Human Resources Management, Fasooto said the appointment was for a period of six months within which all processes for the appointment of a substantive Chief Medical Director would be initiated and concluded by the Ministry.

The statement said Adegbenhigbe, a Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, President, Paediatric Orthopaedic Society of Nigeria, is also the first black African member of the Medical Advisory Board of Ponseti International Association, United States of America.

It read in parts, “He coordinated the first Ponseti International Clubfoot Workshop in West Africa and translated the manual ‘Clubfoot: Ponseti Management’ to Yoruba, Igbo and Hausa languages for use in Nigeria.

“Through him, Nigeria became the first country globally that produced and adopted national clinical guidelines on Clubfoot treatment. He has added two terminologies into the medical encyclopedias- ophthofall and Exposed Bone Syndrome.

“All members of staff and the entire public are implored to kindly support and cooperate with him on this new assignment.”

Our attention has been drawn to inaccurate reports of the proceedings of the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, circulating on various online platforms to the effect that - ‘Lagos Deputy Governor, Renounced Nigerian Citizenship’  
 
The aforestated is not what transpired at the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on 21st of June 2023.  
 
In a bid to advancing the course of the Labour Party outside of the proceedings of the Election Tribunal, the reports have deliberately set out to mislead members of the general public and to whip up sentiments against the incumbent Governor of Lagos State, and his Deputy,  
 
The Distortion Of The Proceedings At The Tribunal 
 
The truth of what transpired at the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, which is verifiable from the Records of the Tribunal, accessible to the public, is detailed below:
On the 21st of June 2023, the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal took the evidence of one Miss Olubusayo Fasidi, a U.S immigration lawyer who admitted to practicing in the United States of America. She was subpoenaed by the Petitioner [Labour Party] to give evidence as to the status of the 3rd Respondent [Dr. Kadri Obafemi Hamzat] as a Nigerian Citizen before the Tribunal. However, Objections were raised as regards her status as a subpoenaed Witness, given that she had no Written Statement on Oath before the Tribunal; moreover, her Written Statement on Oath, filed out of time was eventually withdrawn by the Counsel to the Petitioner.  
 
Notwithstanding the Objections, the Tribunal in her overriding wisdom allowed the Witness to proceed to give oral evidence and reserved its ruling as regards the Objections raised till the final judgement. Thus, during the Examination-in- Chief, the said subpoenaed witness tendered two documents namely, a blank Form of Application for U.S Naturalization and a blank Oath of U.S Allegiance Document, tagged Forms 8CFR/337 and N400 respectively which were admitted and marked as Exhibits.  
 
When the witness was cross examined by the 1st Respondents (INEC) Counsel- the witness was asked whether she was a Nigerian citizen, and she answered in the affirmative. With respect to the question of whether the witness is a citizen of the United States of America, she equally answered in the affirmative; having naturalized prior to that time.
 
When Counsel further asked the witness whether she has renounced her Nigerian Citizenship, the witness responded in the affirmative. The witness confirmed she was familiar with the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution however she declined responding to questions bordering on the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution regarding dual citizenship and renunciation of citizenship (as provided for in sections 28 and 29 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended), on the premise that her evidence is limited to her knowledge of the Immigration law of the United States of America, without more.
 
During cross- examination by Counsel for the 2nd and 3rd Respondents (the incumbent Governor and Deputy Governor of Lagos State), enquired from the witness whether she entered the country with a Nigerian visiting visa, given her claims of renouncing her Nigerian citizenship, but the witness said she did not need a Nigerian visiting visa because she still retained her Nigerian passport. 
 
The witness was asked of the nature of her relationship with one Anna Nweke, to which she responded that Anna Nweke was the person who attested to the documents (Forms 8CFR/337 and N400) that she tendered as exhibits, as to where the attestation was done, she said that the attestation was done upon her arrival in Lagos State, Nigeria.
 
When the witness was confronted with the fact that the only two documents, she was basing her claims on, were merely downloaded blank documents, the witness stated that she had downloaded the blank documents from the official website of the US Embassy. The witness was thus unable to produce the actual documents, the specific jurisdiction of the United States and the particular date when the 3rd Respondent [Dr. Hamzat] applied for naturalization or took the purported Oath of Allegiance.  She equally admitted that she had not attended the ceremony admitting Dr. Hamzat as a citizen of the United States of America.
 
During her cross examination by Counsel to the 4th Respondent (APC), the witness admitted to the fact that the American Constitution recognizes dual citizenship with particular reference to 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ratified on July 9, 1868. The witness was challenged  further that the documents she tendered supports the process of application for naturalization which ultimately culminates in the issuance of an American passport and nothing more.
 
The witness in reaction to additional questions confirmed that she did not need to obtain a Nigerian Visiting Visa because she entered the country with her Nigerian Passport. 
With respect to the question whether the witness was aware that the 3rd Respondent [Dr Hamzat] fully disclosed the details of his American Citizenship in the Form EC9 submitted to INEC, the witness answered in the affirmative. When the witness was again asked whether she had ever sighted the Oath of Allegiance of US Citizenship Form of the 3rd Respondent, the witness responded in the negative.  
 
Conclusion/Advisory 
 
Flowing from the above, there is nowhere in the verifiable record of proceedings of the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal of 21st of June 2023, when the evidence of one Miss Olubusayo Fasidi, a U.S immigration lawyer, was taken to support the misleading online reports that the the incumbent Deputy Governor of Lagos State has renounced his Nigerian Citizenship.  
 
Members of the public are hereby advised to disregard the deliberate falsehood being bandied about regarding the status of the citizenship of the Deputy Governor of Lagos State. The testimony of the witness in question is under serious challenge and in its final judgment the Tribunal will decide whether her testimony is admissible, given that she did not file a witness statement on oath and the self-contradiction of still using a Nigerian passport whilst claiming to have renounced Nigerian citizenship.
 
 

One week after his suspension and subsequent arrest, Abdulrasheed Bawa, chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), remains in custody. This does not speak well.

It doesn’t do credit to the country, the president, the EFCC, or the much-touted but largely ineffectual war against corruption in Nigeria.

Now, the issue is not about whether Bawa has committed any infractions. He is human and susceptible to temptations, and like everyone caught up in violating the rules of engagement, he should face the music of his failings. However, there are ideal ways to do things in a democracy; not following those ideals is problematic.

I am saying that stealing public resources is just a subset of corruption; more intangible corrupt practices often rear their heads in the form of poor judgement in the operations of public policy, cronyism, ignoring due process, sabotaging the system for self-gains and devaluing procedures in the management of public affairs. Every time we run afoul of the law, no matter how highly placed or influential we are, we are guilty of some form of corruption.

 

A point in the case is the penchant of investigating and prosecuting bodies in Nigeria to arrest and detain suspects like it was a fundamental requirement of effective prosecution. 

We must develop a system that respects the dignity of citizens without subjecting them to media trials before they have their day in court. Neither the gravity of the alleged crime nor the suspect’s antecedents (including having previously subjected others to the same treatment) justifies the drama that attends the investigation of people, especially public officials in Nigeria.

And speaking about public officials, it is more about people like Bawa, who led the country’s war against corruption. When we drag people like Bawa and dispense serial and unsubstantiated allegations about them through the media, we erode public confidence in the institution they serve and whatever they represent.

 

Sadly, this has been the EFCC’s trajectory since its inception. It is the leading anti-corruption agency in Nigeria, yet not one of the five people who have led the organisation has left with their heads high. When they were not accused of corruption, the government of the day found an excuse to push and disgrace every chair out of office.

For instance, arguably the most dreaded chair of the EFCC in its 20-year history is Mallam Nuhu Ribadu. Now, national security adviser to President Tinubu, Ribadu’s tenure brought down one state governor and an inspector general of police. He was reputed to have rejected $15 million from a former state governor. Still, his insistence on prosecuting this governor became his albatross when a “new Pharaoh who did not know Joseph” started occupying the Aso Rock Villa.

 Although that government could have removed Ribadu without drama, the Umaru Yar’Adua presidency went for the spectacular! 

Two weeks after he tried prosecuting former Governor James Ibori (a close associate of the president whom he had accused of attempted bribery), Ribadu was disgraced from office. In public glare, he was forced out of a graduation ceremony at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru, Plateau state, demoted by the police, and then retired!

 

Enter Farida Waziri, a retired assistant inspector-general of police (AIG). Throughout her tenure, allegations of covering up for top fraud and money laundering suspects trailed her.

Some reports claimed that certain international donors and partners stopped dealing with Nigeria and that the former American Ambassador, Robin Sanders, once walked out of a meeting with the late Ojo Madueke because Waziri was in the room!

Waziri got the boot in November 2011 with former President Goodluck Jonathan citing “national interest”.

Ibrahim Lamorde replaced Waziri, but he soon came under scrutiny. The senate accused him of stealing some money from the EFCC, even as he was charged with diverting cash and assets recovered from suspects.

 

His successor, Ibrahim Magu, had it rough from the outset. Upon his appointment by former President Muhammadu Buhari in November 2015, the senate refused to confirm him as chairman. They relied on a report from the Department of State Services (DSS), which allegedly indicted Magu for actions prejudicial to state security, associating with persons of interest, and living above his means.

 Buhari eventually suspended Magu in July 2020, after which he was arrested and subjected to investigations by the Justice Ayo Salami (rtd.) panel. The government never made the findings of the panel public, but Magu was accused of corruption, insubordination, and abuse of office by the former attorney-general, Abubakar Malami (SAN). He did not do it.

 

Bawa was a breath of fresh air at his appointment in many respects. However, he went the way of his predecessors last week.

His removal and subsequent arrest shocked Nigerians because he met with President Bola Tinubu a few hours before becoming yesterday’s man. Aside from a recent allegation from former governor of Zamafara state, Bello Mattawale, that Bawa demanded a bribe of 2 million dollars from him, the government only attributed his suspension to the investigations of some “weighty allegations of abuse of office.” And there was the fifth corruption czar in Nigeria, going the same ignoble way as all his predecessors.

 

His continued detention, however, sends wrong signals to Nigerians, who are left to make conjectures about the reason for his arrest. This is more so because of the nebulous character of the expression “weighty allegations of abuse of office.” Historically, we don’t know how much of a president’s or governor’s personal interest is “abuse of office” when an appointee falls out of favour. That always makes things fishy.

So, even though Nigerians cannot vouch for Bawa’s honesty, speculations about steps that he may have taken against President Tinubu’s interests have also hit Nigerians’ consciousness.

 

The government should not keep Bawa for long without sharing the specifics of his offence with Nigerians. This request is not just about taking care of speculations on the particulars of his transgression; it also goes to the root of the credibility of the EFCC as well as the readiness of the administration to tackle corruption once and for all.

It should start with the decent treatment of those whom we remove from this exalted office. Of course, the government must ensure it appoints only people of integrity to this position, but there is also the issue of security of tenure. This absence of this may pressure officeholders into misdemeanours and encourage distractions. We should give adequate attention to the welfare of the leaders and operatives of the EFCC.

Second, we must try to understand why corruption has been so endemic in Nigeria. This is a country where the bribe takers and bribe givers are in a marriage officiated by bribe keepers. Consequently, we have created a nation where the brazen pursuit of wealth defines social character. 

So, is there a sociological explanation for why corruption has become so cultural? Why are people numb to bribery, influence peddling, and reckless circumvention of due processes in all spheres of life?

Thirdly, and most importantly, we must build the power and force in the EFCC around the institution and not the leader. 

The reform of the EFCC must encourage respect for the rule of law, the dignity of persons, and a level playing field where no one is favoured or despised. All animals must be equal in a country ready to deal with corruption, where Nigeria is. Corruption is so widespread that it is suffocating the oil and gas industry, compounding poverty, increasing insecurity, turning many youths into monsters, adulterating our moral foundation, and bringing the country to its knees.

Last Monday, June 19, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu appointed new service chiefs to replace those that served under his predecessor, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari.

The eight appointees include Rear Admiral Emmanuel A. Ogalla from Igbo-Eze North Local Council of Enugu State, who was appointed as Chief of Naval Staff. At first, his appointment had elicited reactions as many could not immediately ascertain whether he hails from the South East. It was later confirmed that he hails from Umuopu Community in Enugu-Ezike, an indication that Tinubu was keen to reflect geo-political spread in the appointment of service chiefs.

Ordinarily, the development should be received with welcoming applause in the region, especially going by the experience of the last administration that did not consider any Igbo person capable to be appointed as a service chief, and into the security council, as well as, the fact that appointment into the topmost echelon of the Navy was coming to the South East region for the second time in the history of the country.

Former Rear Admiral Allison Madueke from Enugu State had also served in that capacity during the military era between 1993 and 1994.

However, since the appointment, what seems like a mixed grill has trailed it in the region. The mixed grill is not because Ogalla is not loved by his people, nor are the people of the region averse to inclusion, but because they still believe that the system has not treated the region fairly.

While there are people who feel that reflecting the geo-political spread in the appointment was a sure way to address some issues in the country, others insist that it was a matter of right and not a special favour done to the people of the region to have appointed one of its own into the security council. They insist that the zone deserves a better deal while pointing to the imbalance in other appointments made so far.

The apex Igbo socio-cultural organisation, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has remained silent since the appointment was made. Many had expected that by now, the group should have either commended or disapproved of it, going by the fact that it had criticised the immediate past president, Muhammadu Buhari, for not appointing an Igbo son into the security council in the eight years that he presided over the country hence Tinubu’s decision to change the perception is worth commending.

The silence of the organisation may not be unconnected with the ongoing election matter at the presidential election tribunal involving Peter Obi and Tinubu. Ohanaeze Ndigbo believes that Obi won the election and may be legitimising the Tinubu administration by reacting to the appointment. Hence, it would prefer not to comment on the activities of the current government until the tribunal matter is sorted out.

Indeed, for eight years, while personnel from other regions of the country served in the security council, Igbos did not. Buhari ensured that no such opportunity was given to the South East even when his position negated the Federal Character principle, which he swore to uphold.

Ohanaeze Ndigbo had on several occasions, while the administration lasted, drawn his attention to it, describing his stance as “hatred and marginalisation against Igbo,” and attributing the increased agitation by separatist groups in the area to deliberate attempts to make them irrelevant in the scheme of things. However, the protests changed nothing.

A cursory look at appointments of service chiefs in the country indicates that the South East region has not been fairly treated. In fact, from 1960 until the present time, not more than seven persons from the zone have served in the security council of the country, with a greater number coming from the military.

 

Sources indicated that aside from the military coup of 1966 that brought in Gen. Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi to serve as General Officer Commanding (GOC) for six months, and as such presided over the security council, the other time was during the Alhaji Shehu Shagari administration when Dr. Alex Ekwueme served as Vice President (1979 – 1983).

Navy Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe (rtd) also served in the Supreme Military Council as Chief of General Staff under the Babangida administration between 1975 and 1977. The other time that the South East region was appointed to the security council was during the Goodluck Jonathan administration. He had appointed Ogbonna Onovo, from Enugu State as the Inspector General of Police. Onovo who served for about one year between July 2009 and September 2010 became the first Igbo man to serve in that capacity since the establishment of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF).

Jonathan had also appointed Lieutenant General Azubuike Ihejirika (rtd) from Abia State as the Chief of Army Staff. It was also the first time someone from the South East was occupying such a position since 1966. Ihejirika, however, served for four years between 2010 and 2014. From 2014 until the appointment made by President Tinubu last Monday, no Igbo had been appointed to the Security Council. Such offices as Security Adviser; Defence Chief; Air Chief; Customs, and Immigration Comptollers, among others, have never been occupied by the Igbo.

This is probably what the president set out to correct last Monday when he announced the appointment of Ogalla as one of the service chiefs. Although many have expressed happiness that the president attempted to satisfy the geo-political spread in the appointments, there are strong indications that it would not address the yearnings of the people of the region.

The Director General of Voice of Nigeria (VON), Osita Okechukwu, who though shared in the sentiments about poor representation of Igbo in top decision-making organs, and the desire of Tinubu to carry every part of the nation along, however, added that democracy is a big elephant with many parts.

 

Okechukwu stressed that the growth of democracy throughout history has been incremental. He stated that democracy is not revolutionary but evolutionary and therefore that the South East may be the greatest beneficiary of the Tinubu-led administration.

He added: “In my calculation, South West benefitted more from ex-president Buhari’s regime than the North West, and South South was not the greatest beneficiary of ex-president Jonathan’s regime. I stand to be corrected.

“Secondly, and of importance as well, was that when the South East produced Senate President, Ministers of Power, Transport, Finance, Chief of Army Staff et al; neither the Second Niger Bridge was constructed nor Enugu-Onitsha, Enugu-Port Harcourt expressways were rehabilitated.

“We must note that appointments to flamboyant high political offices are considered here as very important because we run prebendal or food-is-ready politics. Otherwise, they are not as substantial dividends of democracy as critical physical and social infrastructures.”

Okechukwu continued: “Please, I am not opposed to the South East getting juicy appointments, far from that; what I know as a historical fact is that if it is good in any geo-political zone of our dear country, it will be good to Ndigbo. Nobody can kill the beetle; we live in every nook and cranny of our dear country and invest therein.

“The request one makes from President Tinubu is urgent demand on physical and social infrastructure; for example the provision of electricity, standardisation of Eastern Corridor Standard Gauge Rail line, rehabilitation of roads, and implementation of agricultural Green Imperative Project. These are the key indices for lifting millions out of poverty.”

The National Leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Uchenna Madu, who commended the move to recognise the tripod that established the country, however, insisted that it would not stop agitation by the people of the region.

His words: “We see it as a good development; appointing a South East person into the security council is a welcome development. But it will not stop the agitation for Biafra. At the same time when you look at the composition, it is still one-sided. We are not against that. It is a foundational error. Nigeria doesn’t understand what national unity is. There is nothing like Nigerian interest, but ethnic interest.

“When Buhari was there it was only the Fulani that occupied the major positions. Now Tinubu is there, but we are not blaming him because that is what he met on the ground. We are not surprised. Let him go ahead. We know it is still going to be sectional at the end of the day.

“So, appointing a man from South East into the security council is a good development, but it is not a call for celebration. We cannot celebrate it because it can never stop our agitation for Biafra.

“We also use this medium to remind our brother appointed into the security council that he should focus on national interest because we the Igbo if we have the opportunity to be at the helm of affairs of the country, we shall promote national interest as it has been in our economic life, social life, and religious life. We have continued to focus on our national interest first before our regional interest.

Ndigbo have exhibited national interest and we appeal to him to continue to promote national interest with his office as Chief of Naval Staff. Let him not play ethnic interest. That is what we want because we believe in Nigeria.”

The former National Publicity Secretary of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Mazi Chuks Ibegbu, noted that the appointment does not satisfy the yearnings of the region, stressing that the zone had not been accorded its rightful place in the scheme of things in the country.

“It is the prerogative of the president to make his appointments to reflect every part of the country. The appointment of a naval chief from the South East is not the issue and cannot proffer a solution. It is a right because we are a very strong component of Nigeria. He has not done any favour for us. He did what is required of him but I can tell you that it goes beyond what he has done

“The security architecture has been devoid of a major component of this country for several years. So, we have expected more from him. It is not something to go about rejoicing because we deserve more than that. The security architecture is still highly skewed against the South East. The person appointed from the South East has the highest qualification when compared to the other security chiefs. He merited it.

 

“The truth is that we are missing in action. We are not in the executive arm; we are not in the judicial arm and even in the legislative arm, we cannot say we are there. So nobody should start clapping. The appointments are still highly skewed and not fairly distributed. The country was built on a tripod and the Igbo is a major component that should be given more than it is getting at the moment. So, we don’t think he has done us any favour,” he added

A Civil Rights Activist, Jerry Ogu, however, stated that he was delighted that the president had taken the bold initiative to address issues plaguing the country, stressing that the appointment of security chiefs from various segments would douse tension.

He stated that one major issue that stoked agitation by the South East during the Buhari administration was the refusal to appoint South East to the security council.

“If Tinubu has removed that barrier, it means he is poised to do more if given the opportunity. It also goes to show that we need each other to deepen the progress and development of this country. If we say no to those things breeding discord, we are likely to achieve more as a nation.”

[Guardian]

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) has described the proposed 40 percent hike in electricity tariff scheduled to take effect from July 1, 2023, as “simply outrageous.”

The MAN also highlighted that the federal government had increased electricity tariff by 186 percent in the past eight years, adding that the “expectation of the manufacturers is that government and the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) will ensure improvement in electricity generation, transmission and distribution that will lead to adequate and reliable electricity supply in the country, rather than increasing the tariff on the mere 4000MW, to meet all revenue needs of stakeholders in the electricity supply industry.”

The manufacturers expressed these views yesterday in a press statement titled, “Possible Impact of Impending Electricity Tariff Hike on Manufacturers.”
The manufacturers stated that the proposed increase in tariff would lead to rise in cost of production, reduction in manufacturers’ profit margin, high probability of activities paralysis and potential reduction in government’s collectible revenue.

The association further noted that implementation of the proposed tariff would complicate the inflationary pressure on the economy, accelerate the recession in the manufacturing sector, hurt the competitiveness of Nigerian manufacturers and heighten the probability of manufacturing firms relocating their plants from Nigeria to other countries.

According to the Director General of MAN, Mr. Segun Ajayi-Kadir, who signed the press statement, “it is highly concerning for manufacturers to witness the electricity tariff skyrocketing beyond the present embattling high prices, starting July 1st. A 40 percent hike at this time is simply outrageous.”
Ajayi-Kadir further noted that the absence of stable, effective and fairly priced electricity supply in Nigeria has been a long-standing challenge for manufacturers.
He said: “The worrisome development has compelled many manufacturing industries to supplement the unreliable electricity supply with alternative energy sources. Regrettably, the available alternative energy sources such as diesel have become exorbitantly expensive.
“On average, surveyed data by MAN suggested that manufacturers spent at least N144.5 billion on sourcing alternative energy in 2022, up from N77.22 billion in 2021.

“This translates to about 87 percent increase in the cost of access to alternative energy sources by manufacturers within a year.
“In the past eight years, electricity tariff has been increased by 186 percent. The fact that the government itself owes N75 billion in unpaid electricity bills is indicative of how burdensome the cost of electricity has become.”

The MAN argued strongly that as a matter of fact, any further rise in electricity tariff will directly increase the cost of production for manufacturers.
“Already, we have energy constituting between 28 and 40 percent in the cost structure of manufacturing industries. You can imagine the impact on manufacturing industries that are energy-intensive such as metal processing, heavy machinery, and chemicals manufacturing.”
The Association added that “a spike in the electricity tariff will erode the profit margin of the manufacturers and reduce their ability to expand operations and create new jobs.”

It also feared that reduction in profit margins would be “a definite possibility among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) who are unable to accommodate the higher price.”
MAN states further: “The hike in electricity tariff will reduce the manufacturers’ profitability and by extension the quantum of taxes and fees payable to the three tiers of government.
“Manufacturers remain the largest income taxpayers in the country. Therefore, in the event of poor income generation due to high costs of production, the government purse will suffer.

“In addition, the manufacturers would ultimately pass on the additional cost to the consumers of their products, which will increase the cost of locally made products in the market and complicate the rising inflation rate in the country.
“An increase in electricity tariff will reduce the purchasing capability. One of the resulting effects is the fall in demand and recession of manufacturing activities over time.”

The association also envisaged a high probability of outward investment as “some manufacturing industries may consider shifting production to other economies with lower electricity tariffs and guaranteed availability.”
Ajayi-Kadir adds: “As it is today, the manufacturing sector, which is the engine of growth, is still struggling as a result of the inclement production environment in Nigeria.

“The expectation is that the government will engage in extensive and intensive consultations with the manufacturers; focus on measures that will salvage the sector and halt the trend of shutdown of factories, knowing the implications and the multiplier effects on employment and the economy.
“Care should be taken to avoid introducing burdensome measures that will further strangulate the manufacturing sector and the whole economy.”

The director general of MAN stated further that the government should ensure that at least 90 percent of electricity consumers are metered to ensure consumption reflective electricity bill payment.
He also advised the government to formulate electricity policies that will aid investment in the energy industry to increase generation capacities and ensure effective implementation of the Electricity Act 2023 aimed at increasing electricity supply in the country.

[ThisDay]

The Society for Pharmaceutical Sales and Marketing of Nigeria says ensuring standards and professionalism in sales and marketing in the pharmaceutical sector will contribute to the advancement of the sector and promote the ethical use of drugs by patients.

Speaking at the induction and investiture of fellows of the society in Lagos recently, the president of the society, Tunde Oyeniran, a pharmacist, said recognising the importance of training, ethics and integrity in the sales and marketing of drugs would make a significant impact on the health and well-being of the nation.

He stated, “We are a professional association and that predisposes that there is a minimum level of behaviour, a minimum body of knowledge and a minimum way of doing things, and that is what we are trying to do.

“Before now, that didn’t exist in the pharmaceutical industry. What happens in pharmaceutical sales and marketing is that it is an all-comers affair without any form of standardisation of behaviour, ethics and the way they do things.

“So, what we are trying to do is to bring together everybody involved in sales and marketing whether you are a pharmacist or not. Through this platform, we aim to address common challenges, explore opportunities and promote the highest standards of professionalism and practice in pharmaceutical sales and marketing.”

He said the society recognised the contributions of sales and marketing professionals in driving the success of the pharmaceutical industry, adding that unethical practices would not be tolerated.

[Punch]

  • SEC says it is a law-abiding agency that has duly audited its financial accounts year after year before and onward from 2014
  • Statements submitted to Federal Ministry of Finance, Budget and National Planning; Office of the Auditor General of the Federation; Fiscal Responsibility Commission
  • They add proper dissemination of factual information is critical to the growth and development of the capital market

Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), denied media reports claiming it has not audited its financial statements since 2014.

In a statement released on Friday signed by its management, the SEC revealed it is a strong promoter of world-class corporate governance standards, and hereby restates its commitment to upholding such ideals.

False Claims

SEC stated that its attention had been drawn to some reports in the electronic and print media, insinuating that the Commission had not audited its financial statements since 2014, adding:

  • “ Contrary to these false claims, the Commission as a law-abiding agency has duly audited its financial accounts year after year before and onward from 2014 and has submitted these to the relevant agencies statutorily empowered by the Federal Government to receive same.

The said agencies they have submitted statements to are the Federal Ministry of Finance, Budget and National Planning; Office of the Auditor General of the Federation; Fiscal Responsibility Commission; Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, as well as the appropriate committees of the National Assembly.

SEC also noted that it is a strong promoter of world-class corporate governance standards, hereby restates its commitment to upholding such ideals and strongly advises persons with requests for information to channel such to the Commission via email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., to which the Commission would respond accordingly.

  • “The dissemination of factual information is critical to complement the efforts of the Federal Government for the growth and development of the capital market and Nigeria’s economy.

SEC in the news

Nairametrics reported recently that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said that it is collaborating with the Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON) to develop standards for commodities.

Director General of the SEC, Mr. Lamido Yuguda added that Nigeria has various commodities that could be exported in a bid to grow the economy, provide jobs for Nigerians as well as provide the nation with forex.

Yuguda said that the agricultural sector in the country is expected to grow significantly soon.

  • ‘’In its desire to ensure that agricultural produce is of exportable standards and quality, the Commission is collaborating with the Standards Organization of Nigeria to develop standards for commodities”, he said.

Developed standards being exposed to different markets

He also disclosed that because of the collaboration with SON, some of the standards have been developed and exposed to different markets close by and they have been received very well.

The DG said that the development of these standards will pave the way for the export of these products to the international market and in turn, boost the Nigerian economy.

He said that the Commission is pleased about the new government’s mention of supporting the commodities sector as it will further boost the SEC’s efforts at developing the Commodities sector.

[Nairametrics]